Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Bill On The Blaze: Anti-Semitism is Apparent in the Democratic Party; The Progressive Left is Fueling Hate Throughout America; Will America Become The

Episode Date: March 8, 2019

The freshmen class of Democrats in the house supporting Anti-Israel & Anti-Semitic Sentiments; The far-left is on a warpath of virtue signaling; Do the American people want their country to become a Socialist failure? Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bill O'Reilly is here to talk a little bit more about it. Hi, Bill. Hey, you guys. How are you doing? So tell me about the liberal emergency. Yeah, I know. I know. Okay, so it's the national emergency that Donald Trump declared on the southern border,

the far left has declared a national emergency as well. But it's not the same. Their national emergency is Donald Trump's president. That's the national emergency for many in the Democratic Party in the far-left progressive movement. So everything else, every other issue is subordinate to that. We've got to get them out. No matter what it takes, we don't have to be honest. We don't have to be insightful.

If people get hurt in the process, well, that's collateral damage because it's a national emergency. Donald Trump's got to get out. And we're going to get them. so that's where we are in this country so if you're expecting congress over the next two years to solve any problems they're not going to and as you pointed out one of the you know they can't even get one of their members the democratic party to say um you know maybe calling people who support israel uh greedy money people um that's not really very nice or accurate i'm sorry i said that maybe that could happen no no no no no uh-uh they're not even going to do that and they're not

doing that because they don't they don't want to pull apart the coalition that is trying to get Donald Trump I mean that was the word from Joy Behar on the view why are they doing this why do they even have to talk about this they're they're they're separating themselves when our target is Donald Trump in 2020 that's right but it's even a little bit more than that because Joy Beahar doesn't have the intellect to really understand what's happening in the country. It's a little bit more than that. So you do have a genuine fissure in the Democratic Party. And you're going to see that in the upcoming campaign when Biden gets in.

You're going to see it. That'll really crystallize it for everybody. So there's a genuine fissure between the far left progressives who want socialism and green. whatever they want totally remaking the country because I feel the country's bad and the traditional

Democrats Pelosi the party apparachshnics who basically just want power they don't want a big realignment of the country they just want to run the show so that fissure

is there and it's real and when these young women in Congress come forth and say these insane things the traditional Democrats go, oh, boy, this is going to make it even harder for us to obtain power. So that's what's going on in that party. Well, Bill, doesn't there come a time like the Labor Party? The Labor Party over in England has gone so far left.

They're run by a guy who has never taken the side of England on anything, stood with the USSR during the Cold War, has never, stood with Great Britain, same kind of stuff we're facing here. And he is radically anti-Semitic and in, you know, in negotiations and in cahoots, I should say, with Hezbollah and Hamas, wildly anti-Semitic. And Labor Party members who are very left have now, I think seven of them, have left the party and said, this is not the Labor Party. This is becoming something entirely different.

Do you see that on the horizon at all? Are there any Democrats who will raise the flag and say, look, this is not the Democratic Party? No, I really don't see it because they might think that, but if they do that, the Twitter mob will descend on them and tear them to pieces. So you're saying that British politicians have more courage than American politicians? I can't generalize in that area, but I can tell you the fear among all politicians in this country and the United States is they're going to get torn apart on the social media apparatus. So you have to understand that this permeates into everything, everything.

So no longer are you going to have profiles and courage. You know, John F. Kennedy wrote a book, profiles and current. That's gone. Because if you stand up, if you're a Democrat in the House of Representatives, and you stand up and you point fingers at the progressive movement and say, this is out of control, not only are they besmirching a great ally in Israel, but they're linking in to anybody who supports Israel that they're money hungry. So this is out of control, and I, as a Democrat, are not going to tolerate it.

I'm not going to tolerate it. Well, within 24 hours, your life is going to be assaulted in a way that you cannot even imagine. You cannot even imagine. And these politicians, they don't want that. None of them do. And neither do the media people. So if you're on television, they haven't gotten a wrong. radio yet. I figure that's coming, but they haven't got ready. It's mostly television.

If you're on television and you say what I just said, they're committing to sponsor boycotts. They're going to find somebody to accuse you of something. And everybody knows it now. That this is, it's an extortion that is never before seen in the United States. And I'm telling people, I'm trying to be Paul Revere here, that you've got to understand this, the fear that is cloaked Washington, D.C. and honest media people, how much outrage have you seen about these comments about Israel and Israeli supporters? Well, I will. You haven't seen much, much outrage from the powerful people in Washington. No. They merely mouth it. Yeah. And it's like Pelosi. Pelosi yesterday goes, well, he didn't really mean it. Yeah, she did. Yes, she did. Yeah. I mean, if you trace her

whole history, she absolutely meant it. But there's what was, yeah, yeah, she didn't really mean. She doesn't understand the power of the word she says. Just keep in mind what I'm saying to you. Never before in this country has there been such a threat to honest reactions. What do you mean, honest reactions? So if you feel that something is wrong and you stand up and that goes against the Twitter mob, that goes against the progressive movement, they're going to try to destroy you. Well, I mean, Bill. You and your family.

Look, if you didn't get it from Brett Kavanaugh, and I'm not saying you, Glenn Back, you stew, I'm saying you, the listeners. If you didn't get it from Brett Kavanaugh, if you didn't get what the potential for harm is now, then you'll never get it it is why honestly bill i have been trying so hard to um try to bring conservatives together and we've we have to stand together even if we vehemently disagree with each other we have to stay and stand together because they're going to pick us off one by one they're all they've been not conservatives it's not you know it's Anybody.

Yeah. You got to go into the precincts of the independence and precincts of fair-minded Americans. I still believe, maybe I'm naive after all these years, that most Americans are fair-minded. And that if they actually knew what was happening, on a two-front basis, the Twitter mob, the progressive movement, funded by tens of millions of dollars, combined with a corrupt media that basically wants to. run the country. These six media companies that control 90% of the national news law want to run the country. Jeff Bezos wants to run the United States. They have all the money they want. They can't buy any more stuff. So what's left? They want power. They're down at six companies they want to run the country. And that's what you're seeing. It's amazing to me that the Democrats say that

that they hate money in the system and that these these packs have too much money. They're putting too much money into the system and look at Israel and how Israel is just pumping all this money and it's wrong and people should know about it. The leading, what do you call it, investment, I guess, what do you call it, what do you call it, Stu? lobbyists, people who are putting more money in lobbying than anybody else, are people like Google. And you don't hear anybody saying a word about Google or Amazon or anybody. That's where they're actually writing laws. Google is actually writing bills. And you don't hear anything about that.

They want the power. They have the money. They have the technology. want the crowd. But here's the best example that everybody can understand. A congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, we learn, is now being run by a multi-millionaire out of Fort Worth, Texas, who pays all her bills, who finance her entire campaign, and is now being accused of funneling $850,000 out of that campaign into his private companies. You know this story, correct? Yes. Well, I know some of it. I didn't know. I know. I know. I, I know. I,

know about the funneling money. I didn't know about the person right here in my own backyard. Bill O'Reilly, you know, it's curious. I asked a, I don't know, a couple of months ago, here she is this woman who is a bartender, who's now wearing two, three, four, $5,000 outfits. She is living seemingly a jet setter's life. I know, I know congressmen who come in and have to sleep on the floor of their congressional office because they can't afford an apartment.

She's got a nice place to live in Washington, D.C. She rejected her predecessor's old office in her district because she said the rent was too high because the landlord was being greedy and was going to increase her rent to where it would be an exorbitant price. But she goes out and she finds a new office that is much more expensive

than the exorbitant rate that the landlord was asking for the last one. And I wondered, where is this woman getting all of her money? Yeah, she's got a godfather and a young guy made his money in tech, Harvard grad, Fort Worth, Texas base, and paying all bills. How do we know this bill? It's not going to be illegal about that. If somebody wants to pay your bills, they can pay your bills.

How do we know this? What? How do we know this? it's a reportage I mean I'm very cynical about the press but it has not been refuted by the congresswoman I was waiting to that New York Post is leading the investigation into this thing but it's real I don't know for I don't see the receipts but there's nobody that says no no he's not doing this he seems to be so if you step back, as I always do, and you say this woman had zero resources, nothing. Okay, nobody knows she was, and she couldn't possibly have defeated the incumbent Democrat Crowley, who had been

there for 20 years, because she didn't have enough money. And then all of a sudden she does have enough money. Okay, where do money come from? So, you know, I think down the line, she's a short-termer in the House. I don't think she's going to be there. along. I think she'll be hosting a reality program on NBC. And that's her future. But for I think that she, I think she would be happier there. And I think she'd be more dangerous there. She wants to be a star. Yeah. She definitely wants to be a star. And she's not going to be a senator. She's not going to go any higher than the house. Her seat is secure. She'll, she's not going to get out of there. They'll, Bronson, Queens will put her back. I mean, because she's theirs. And

And she's got, you know, now profile, so she's going to stay there forever in the house. But she's going to get a boy there, and she's going to want to go to L.A. and live large there. I see what's going to happen. All right. Let me take you back to something that you wrote about in your op-ed about trade deficits. We are now at a record trade deficit with China, which the president said that's what this trade war was all about. And now we are at, what is it, $900 billion? which is a record.

It is, it's proving this philosophy that we're, we're working under right now as being inaccurate. What do you, what do you think on this? Well, I mean, for decades, China has paid the, well, we're going to send you a thousand times more stuff than you can send us. And all the presidents have said, okay, you know, just don't blow anybody up or invade any countries and and we'll uh we'll let you do that so trump way back to 1990 you know I'm writing the Trump book right yeah you've told me once or a thousand times okay I mean I know I know I God I know but I'm but I'm gonna charge you every time researching I'm researching all yeah all right so he's right in front of me so Trump in 1990

so I say hey wait a minute you know we're getting a host here and be Because our people can't sell to the 1.5 billion Chinese. They're putting every barrier in the world to sell our stuff over there, but yet we're taking their stuff no matter what they send us. And he's jumping up and down in 1990 about it. So nobody does anything about it because if you get involved with China, it's a very difficult thing. I'm hoping that Trump can break through with some kind of deal.

That's better for the United States. You know, that would be terrific if that happens. He says it will. I'm not so sure. But that's what's going on. And China basically hoses us and takes the money. And it doesn't get to the Chinese people. Of course, it gets to the communists who are running the show in Beijing.

That's who takes all the American money. They skim off the top of everything over there. So there was something that was kind of disturbing because the one thing that I have agreed with Donald Trump on, and he has brought me around on with trade with China. China. It was around Christmas time. He started talking about Huawei and 5G and how this is a national security risk. And I thought, okay, national security risk. I agree with this. 5G is the most important thing that is coming our way. We cannot have the Chinese have any access to 5G and the information because, you know, I'm sorry I just don't trust the communist Chinese. and he was taking a tough stand. This week, however, it looks like the White House maybe just using this as a bargaining chip and using it on trade.

Does he believe this is a national security risk, or is this something that is just a chip on the table? Well, look, Donald Trump wants to be reelected, okay? Above all. And if he makes a deal with China, that's better for the U.S. economy, the stock market will jump and the business community be very happy. So if it's between that and some kind of theoretical threat to national security, what do you think he's going to do? All right. Back with more Bill O'Reilly in just a second. Bill, I want to touch base quickly on Venezuela. Rubio is now saying that he wants the U.S. to initiate, quote, widespread unrest. rest in Venezuela and looking to initiate a full-on Syria option for Venezuela. How do you feel about that?

You know, I think Venezuela should take care of themselves. I don't think we should be getting involved with that. And we have no place in should we be endorsing Maduro or does it matter? Yeah, I mean, that's fine. if the State Department believes there's fraud in the election and this guy Maduro is the legitimate leader

sure and you help him out when you can help them out but you know it doesn't do the United States any good to involve itself in these unbelievably complicated situations

inside other countries it just doesn't we should do humanitarian stuff we can absolutely make our opinion known if there is oppression by the Venezuelan government, we can put sanctions on there and do all that. But for us to get directly involved like Rubio wants, you know, I just don't see it.

Yeah. Let me talk to you now about the election. Let's spend the next few minutes just talking about the election. It's astounding to me that the guy who used to be one of the top two liberal senators in the Senate for years. and years and years, real, real lefty Democrat was Joe Biden. And he's now being described as the moderate, if he comes into the race. What do you see with Joe Biden?

How is he going to thread the needle here between, you know, the care supporters, the radical socialists, and being, quote, in the middle? going to thread that needle? Well, here's what I'm hearing, Beck. You want the insides? Yeah, no, tell me the outside string. All right. I can give you what everybody else gives you. No, don't give me the inside. I'll give you the inside. Okay, all right. Okay, so Biden, Biden's 77 years old, and he really doesn't want to go to

Iowa and New Hampshire in the winter, okay? He really doesn't want to do that. He doesn't want to put on the galoshes and go to the diner. He doesn't. So he's talking to his big money men on Wall Street. And this goes right against the progressive socialists, right? And he's lining them up. He's lining them up because there's 14 Democrats and he needs a certain threshold of money to campaign not retail, but on television and in social media,

and that takes money. So he's got to have a certain threshold of money that he's sure he's got so he doesn't have to walk around, shaking better he can't he'll do a little of that but he doesn't want to do a lot of it okay so once he gets the money and i believe he'll get it because the democrats on wall street and in hollywood the real rich people they don't want the crazy bomb throwers then he's going to make a deal with tamala harris all right and that deal might already have been made you don't think it's betto no he's two white men are not going to happen it's not

going to happen um so he's going to make a deal with chamella harris he's going to say look when you're campaigning you're not going to win don't be a nut don't be alone all right bring it back a little bit and then i'll put you on the two and she's going to make that deal he's a young woman and she knows joe is going to be uh what 79 when he takes the oath of office oldest president ever So that's what's going on, man. Okay. So tell me now, go ahead. Yeah, Biden will, he will campaign as a moderate liberal.

That's how he'll campaign. He's going to be Barack Obama redo. Redoux, how about that, huh? Nice. All right, we see a six-point increase in American saying that Trump should be impeached, up now to 42%. How high does that number have to be? before it would be wise for the Democrats to even do this to try?

Never. Okay. Never. I don't think so either. Right. Because there's nothing to base it on. And Americans will be, I think, the independent precincts will say, you know what, I may not like Trump, but I hate these people more. 56% approve of the economy now.

Overall, he has a 42 to 45% approval rating. What kind of rating does he need to work? win the election? No, he can stay in the mid-40s on job approval if the Democratic Party continues to put forth an insane platform. So, you know, if they continue to be self-destructive and do all kinds of nasty stuff that hurts the country and they don't have any solutions to any problems, which they don't, he can win with a 45.

Bill, do you agree with the analysis that it's, you know, elections aren't about approval rating. They're about choices. And the bottom line is right now we don't know who they're running. If they run someone like Hillary Clinton again, he's going to win. Yeah, well, he's not going to run her. No, not her, but I mean someone is unpopular as her. Bernie Sanders. Yeah.

Bernie Sanders. Yeah. Okay, because Bernie will be out there every hour on the hour. Bernie is going to be climbing in people's windows. Yeah, it's a guarantee loss. Guarantee loss. Say some crazy thing happens in Bernie. he gets it. Yeah. Well, then Trump doesn't even have to campaign. Trump will just beat him

you know. It's true. George McGovern. Yeah. Right. Yeah. So it's going to be Biden and that's what's really going to happen.