Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Bill On The Blaze: Trump's Consideration to Declare Drug Cartels as a 'Terrorist Group'; Illhan Omar's Questionable History; Youth's Phone Obsession

Episode Date: March 14, 2019

Bill goes into detail on why it will be beneficial for the United States Government to declare drug cartels as a terrorist threat to our nation; A deep dive into some of Illhan Omar's remarks on the Jewish people; Discussing the youth of today's need to live through their phones. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

This is the Glymbeck program. So Beto is running. Yay! Also, China said that they will help Venezuela restore their power, and they concur with Maduro. It looks like the United States may have collapsed your power grid. Wow. Trump may label Mexican cartels, foreign terrorist organizations.

2020, the Democrats say they have to pack the Supreme Court. plus the GOP senators. Finally, for the first time in, what, 15 years, somebody in Congress is saying, you know what, we can't lose this power. This power belongs to us, and the national emergency is now in jeopardy because of some senators. I don't know how you feel about it. I know how I feel. Let's find out Bill O'Reilly what it means in one minute. this is the glenbeck program bill o'reilly from bill o'reilly dot com welcome sir oh glenbeck how are you today

yeah no you know you know i'm making i'm i'm making i you know what i'll talk about this later maybe if we have time i'm going to see tony robbins and spend a weekend with tony robinson i don't know if i have the motivation that's going to involve sit-ups and stuff oh i know it's i know so anyway Let's, let's, let's, let's, let's, well, where do you want to start? Beto? Beto is a standard issue, a Democrat, not a socialist, channeling Robert Kennedy. That's how he presents himself. I think he studied tapes of RFK.

Yeah. Same mannerism, same hair. Yeah. You know, he's got a following. will he distinguish himself maybe you've got energy um you know Bernie is what 112 years old I mean that's pretty tough I know Beto's coming on in he's gonna make everybody happy and social justice will return and we'll take a look at reparations and we'll let all the people in

because we're a humane country you know a standard issue okay let me go to something I think that does make a difference. The GOP senators that say you can't do the emergency powers. It was Mike Lee, Chuck Grassley, Tom Tillis, Joni Ernst, Pat Toomey, Ron Johnson, Jerry Moran, Lamar Alexander, Ben Sasse, Roy Blunt, Rob Portman, Todd Young, Mitt Romney, Ted Cruz, and Roger Wickker. How is this going to fly with Donald Trump and what does this mean? It doesn't mean much. I don't believe all those Republican senators will vote against the national emergency decree.

I think five will vote against it. Then Trump will veto both the House and the Senate bills when they reconcile them. And he'll find the money to build some of the wall. I mean, there's no deviation. I mean, it's not like Trump is worried about this. He's having corned beef and cabbage with the Prime Minister of Ireland today. That's this whole day with Irish. They're going to be doing Irish step dancing.

They're going to be. Please don't make me lose faith in our government even more, please. But that's what Trump's schedule is. So schedule is Irish stuff today. And he's not really worried about this because he hasn't vetoed anything, which is interesting in two years. He'll veto this, and then they'll go on. Now, I understand the GOP's point of view because they fear there'll be a Democratic president next time around, and he'll do the same thing Trump is doing.

National emergency every time you turn around. I got it. But I really think there is a national emergency on the southern border, and I'd like to see some improvements take place down there. So do I, and I don't know any other way to solve this, because mainly because of the weasels in Washington that said they cared about the border, mainly the GOP, but also the people that have told us even through, you know, Obama and Bill Clinton, all those people used to say that, you know, the border was a real problem.

It is a real problem, and they just don't want to take care of it for some reason or another. And I think it's despicable, so I don't know what to do about it. I don't think the American people know what to do about it. Well, Congress is not going to pass any kind of profound immigration laws, because the Democratic Party understands they have grown in strength because of the mass immigration of Hispanics into the country. There's no doubt about it. I mean, if you look at the demographics in the early 1990s and compare them today, Hispanic voters have grown fourfold in the country, and most of them vote Democrat. So that's what's in play. But even when the Republicans at both houses of Congress, they didn't do anything.

They're afraid, and they don't want to be branded or racist in all that business. So that's where we are. Let's go to the Democrats. They said this week that they believe they're going to have to pack the court in 2020. Yeah, that's dangerous, boy. That is, that's insane. I mean, FDR tried to do that. And it was one of the things that Americans stood up.

and push back hard on. And now nobody even knows who FDR is. Yeah. So we're in a totally different ballgame. Look, 1869, Congress decided they're going to be non-Sprime court justices, and it stood from 1869 to the present day. But Congress can change that. They can have 75 if they want.

Now, it'll be a brawl. It'll be a fight if the Democrats take the White House and the Senate. And it could happen. Absolutely could happen. I mean, Bill, we have the people who are running now for the Democratic Party. They won't even admit that they're a capitalist. Sure. I mean, because that's evil, Beck. It's evil to succeed. It's evil to have money. But it's not, but it is not with the vast majority of Americans, both Republican and Democrat.

Is it? Right. The polls show that only 25. percent of Americans really want to be socialists. Okay. But, you know, I'm getting a little tired of the vast Americans this, the vast Americans, that, because they don't do anything. They

just say, yeah, we don't want it, but who's running wild in this country? Who's controlling the media in this country? Who's controlling the social media? Who? Progressive left? Who's fighting them? Nobody? No, not true. No, wait, wait, wait, wait. Not true. Don't, don't say.

Well, he's fighting them back beside you and me. No, no, no, no. The audiences of our combined reach for most of right America. They're with us, yes, but they're not organizing. They don't know how to. The media matters on the right. They don't know how to, and you can't. Wait a minute.

How did the progressive left know how to? The progressive left is willing to take their money and put it where their mouth is. everyone I have ever met with that is a multi-millionaire or billionaire, they're all looking for a return on their investment. What do I get? What do I get? Here's what Media Matter said. Nothing, except these policies being put into play. So you're doing something because we all believe in change. The right, with the big money, they don't step up to the plate. George Soros who can gather 25 billionaires, put them in a room. They'll fund for a decade some of these crazy radical operations.

And it works because then you can actually put the structure in. That's the problem. The people will organize, but they will organize and they did it with the Tea Party. They will come together. You cannot get anybody with power putting it together. There isn't an effective counterpunch to the craziness on the progressive left, and there should be. But the problem is that the conservative leadership is afraid. It's afraid.

I mean, let's take our alma mater, Fox News. They're scared to death of media matters. There's nobody fighting them. Okay. You're saying that they're not going to fight with Tucker Carlson to keep him? they may keep him but they're not certainly not fighting for him you know

I don't think they cannot keep him after what they did to me I mean they've lost a million 200,000 viewers from 8 to 9 o'clock since I left and they're going to throw this guy overboard now that'll be the end of that network but my point is they don't fight

who's fighting Trump fights the press all right And in my column just released on Bill O'Reilly.com, Trump's winning that fight. He's one guy against 10,000, but he's so powerful because he's president that he's actually winning his fight against the press. I think. But Trump isn't organizing against the Soros people. Who's doing that?

Nobody. Because you're exactly right. I think we may be saying the same thing. because people with real influence and real power will not put their money where their mouth is, nor will they come together. Look at the former Speaker of the House, Ryan. He did Jack, Jack, when he was in there. Nothing.

No immigration, nothing. No fight back, no organization, nothing. Why? He's scared. He was scared. Look, even Nancy Pelosi is scared of those. people, those progressive left people. Pelosi's petrified of those people. These are vicious verbal assassins. They can ruin you. And who's fighting against them? Well, you know that

they are powerful when the guy who was the guy on television, he's the head of media matters now, the guy who was on television saying, oh my gosh, look at what he said. Look at what Tucker Carlson said on Bubba the Love Sponge, at the same time in 2000, between 2006 and 2011, and that same time, he was on his blog talking about trannies, talking about how Bangladesh he is an absolute pig. He's not even worth discussing. And by the way, the sponge had a very good column op-ed in the Wall Street Journal today. That's Mr. Sponge. That's Mr. Sponge to you. But what I'm trying to say to you is that all of our policy in this country now, including packing the Supreme Court, the move to socialism, all of this is being driven by the social media. That's who's doing it.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez would be a game show host in Tulsa if she didn't have social media behind her. And she could say, like, and you know, 55 times on the game show. But she is not a – And people got to wise up. Bill, she is not a self-created person. She's not. She got millions of dollars. I told you that last week.

Yes. Did you go over to the guy's house in Fort Worth back where I told you to do? No, I don't show up at people's houses, but I appreciate that. All ahead. You'd be happy to you. Yeah, no, I'm sure he would. Bring brownies. So then what's your advice then, Bill?

Well, I mean, there has to be PACs, political action committees. formed and money donated to those packs on the traditional conservative side. And they have got to have enough lawyers and enough communicators, whereas when these media matters, people come out with the noose and when the me-toes come out and everybody else trying to kill people like Brett Kavanaugh, that they provide a balance and an aggressive posture to at least counter it. Now, I know they're not going to get time on CNN and MSNBC. That's a big problem because Media Matters is a pipeline right in due to the mainstream media,

whereas the conservative traditional people won't, but they can get on your show and my show. Yeah, I will tell you, Media Matters. The Washington Post actually contacted me yesterday and said, we know you have experience with Media Matters, and we're doing a story on Media Matters and wanted to know if you had ever found anything that they had ever done credible. I didn't even respond, you know, verbally. I just wrote a note. The fact that you could even ask this question with a straight face

shows you the state of the Washington Post. Back with more Bill O'Reilly here in just a second. It's a glimback program. filling in for Steve Brigitteur, Stu, is the one and the only, the very lovely and talented Pat Gray. Thank you. Yes. Yes. Good to be here. Bill, welcome back to the program. Trump may label Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. What are the ramifications of that? That's a good thing. So you've got to have an arrangement with Mexico City, of course. and you guys said, look, we're going to designate these cartels as dangerous to the world,

not just to you, Mexico City, and we, Washington, D.C. And if we find out where they live, we're going to drop a drone on them. If we see a caravan of heroin-laden vehicles, we're going to blow them up from the sky. That's what you can do on a designated Terra watch. So the United States can send special. forces. They'd have to get permission. But you can do all kinds of military action against designated terror groups. You can, but do you believe, Bill, that the United States would ever do that? I would. No, I think Trump would. You've got to get the permission of the guy

in Mexico City. Yeah. And you fear he would go along with it because he want these people to continue to corrupt his country to the extent they have. Do you want that? I will So once you get the U.S. military targeting you for death, the equation changes. Does it not? I will tell you that I wouldn't put it past some Texans to have already hired people to do things like that. Yeah, but come on, back. Drone warfare, Obama used it, and we don't even know the extent that he used it. But they really put a hurt on these people from the sky.

And what happens when they have pictures of dead little children in Mexico? In Mexico. You bet. I mean, you have to be very surgical and you have to be very careful. I understand. But just the chill that that would put in the cartel realm would be substantial, I think. Yes. I wonder about the chill on the other side of now for, you know, again, drug cartels. It is a serious, serious issue. It's killing hundreds of thousands of Americans. That's the bottom line on it. Okay. So we lost 3,000 on 9-11, and then we wiped out thousands of Islamic fundamentalists. We lose in 100,000 a year. We're not doing any.

anything to these cartels. Does that make sense to anybody on this planet? No. Mexico's losing a lot of people, too. They had something like, they had double the murders that the United States had. And they don't even report most of the murders. Yeah, and that's with a third of the population of the United States. I mean, it's, it's 50,000 murders last year alone. And I put the number at 60 to 70,000. You can't even go to Acapulco. All right. So Elvis had a movie fun in Alcapulco. Elvis could not do a remake. if you were still alive. You can't go there. It's controlled by cartels. Do you realize that 66 American citizens were kidnapped in Mexico last year back? Did you know that? Yes, I did.

66. All right. So these people have declared war on the United States, the cartels. We're going to send fentanyl, heroin, cocaine, every other drug, methamphetamine, right across your border. Your politicians are too cowardly to stop it. We know that. We're going to make billions of and blank you. So Trump says, all right, well, we're going to designate you a terror group. Have fun with the drone in your backyard. So when I was at CNN, I did a special on the number of Americans that had been kidnapped by drug cartels and brought across the border. All these young girls just taken and nobody cared except the people in the community.

I couldn't get CNN to move. went to Fox, they said, oh, they, they, they'd help. We'd get on that story. No, they never did. People are not willing to do the heavy lifting about our border. This is the Glenbeck program. Joining us is Pat Gray filling in for Stu today, who is off for a couple of days for some unknown reason. Maybe it was raining. I don't know. And, and Bill O'Reilly, joins us. So, Bill, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals just gave more protection to asylum seekers. It's happened yesterday. So we only had 100,000 asylum seekers last year. And now, according to the Ninth Circuit Appeals Court, we can't send any of them right back. So they have to have a jury

trial here before we can deport them. Is this going to the U.S. Supreme Court? Is this going to wind up where there, I mean, there's just a deluge that we can't do anything about? Of course. It'll be $500,000 in the next two or three years. And I'll go to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court will rule that the government has a discretion on what asylum cases to hear. They will overturn the Ninth Circuit. But this is, you know, another example of where the country is going if the progressive

left gets power. all right if they take both houses and the presidency this is what you're going to see a totally open border situation everybody knows the game and the cartels are involved with the people smuggling everybody knows that as well and then i think what the hills doesn't care they don't care um they want open borders it's amazing it's amazing to me how how far away from the people um things are things in Washington are. I mean, it's, it's like they just, they're just, they're a foreign entity now almost. The federal government is just becoming this foreign entity that is not reflective or representative of the people at all. Let me ask you this, Bill. Go ahead.

Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait, let me comment on that. It's not just Washington. Look at the entire state of California. Look at Oregon, Washington state. I mean, these states are more radical than Washington is. So there's been a gift in the country. And it's so dangerous. You know, I'm saying to myself, I don't know. You know, I still

think I agree with you that most Americans are with us. Common sense. America's noble. All policies should be geared to giving everybody an equal opportunity to pursue happiness. But to alter and

dramatically change everything about America? That's insane. But that's what the progressive left wants. Well, it's not only the progressive left. It is also the Islamists that are in charge of, you know, things like care. And we have two congresswomen now going to do fundraisers this weekend for care. This is a sister organization for Hamas. It was created by the Muslim Brotherhood through the Palestinian Council to be a propaganda device to change people. And I'll tell you, the real power in Washington that everybody's afraid of is care. I mean, Janine Piro said, do you have her exact quote, Pat?

Not in front of me. Okay, well, she basically said, you know. I know what it is. You want to know what it is? Yeah, go ahead. She was questioning if some, a Muslim woman, where's a hijib, whether that indicates she doesn't have allegiance to the Constitution, but she does have it to Sharia law. She asked a question, provocative question, no doubt. And then she was condemned by her own news network.

Yeah, were you surprised that Fox basically condemned what she said? Yes, I was. you can do that in another way. So if the network decides it believes that Judge Piro went over the editorial line and was purposely offensive to Muslim Americans, then you put her on the next day and have her debate the issue with a designated Fox person. Right. And say, okay, what did you mean? Do you understand that your remarks could be hurtful to certain people who are in the minority?

and maybe fearful. And that's how you do it. You don't hang them in the court of public opinion. That is the fear of, is that an agreement with what care is saying? Or is that the fear of care on the part of Fox? Look, I'm not jazzed up about Islamic intrusion into the American culture. I just don't see it. as a major problem because of the numbers.

The numbers are infantessable. Aren't very many Muslims here. And the ones that are here don't cause trouble. Care is a bad organization. All right, it is. We all know that. It sympathizes with killers. But there are a lot of bad organizations.

This isn't a priority of mine. Wow. However, if you are going to raise a point about Sharia law, because if you go by Sharia law, you cannot then, except the American Constitution. You can't. Sharia law is dramatically opposite. So if you have a congresswoman wearing a jeep,

you can ask her, which is more important to you, madam, Sharia law or the U.S. Constitution? It's a pretty simple question, right? and it's certainly legitimate to ask it. Well, I think it's extraordinarily legitimate, but it is, and it's as easy as, are you a capitalist to answer, but they don't ever want to answer any of those questions.

That question hasn't ever been asked of Congressman Omar. That's how bad and impotent our American press is. What Judge Barrow should have done was simply just ask that question. That's all. All right? Madam, I'd like to know, you can email me, text me, go on the program, Torea law or the Constitution, which has your allegiance. You can't say both, right?

Isn't that legitimate? Yes, absolutely, yes. Let me go to Accio-Cortez. She, in remarkable video from a hearing, she accuses Wells Fargo's CEO of financing the caging of children, then she says that maybe the banks should be held responsible for global warming because they finance people that do things like oil companies that harm the environment.

I'm responsible for global warming, Beck. You are? I am. Okay. I did it. And I'm sorry. Okay. All right.

Well, I'll take your apology. Can you stop doing it? On bill o'Reilly.com, we have a montage of Congresswoman Cortez saying, like, and you know, a hundred million times. Yeah, so good. I know, yeah. When you hear someone, when you hear someone say the word like, every other sentence or every other word, and you know, you know, you know, you know, then you know, that person is not thinking. If you are thinking about what you are saying, you don't say like you know. So I have now convinced that she comes in with a script written for her by others

and throws bombs simply to get attention. That's what I'm convinced is happening with the congressman. I will tell you that there is a blogger out who made this a very compelling case. Mr. Reagan. I don't even know the guy's name. I just know the logo on the screen from this, Mr. Reagan. And I have not checked into it, but the evidence that he presented was pretty compelling about that, that she was selected.

There was a casting call by a liberal organization. They have the people who did it on video saying we did a casting call. We wanted to see who could run. blah, blah, blah. We got a thousand applications. And out of that, we found Accio-Cortez. We met with her. It shows the video of them meeting, the conversation that they had. Then it shows all of the conversations of the leadership that is now around her, what they were saying a few years ago, and then word-for-word her saying it. And once you ask her beyond the talking point, like, you know, she has no idea. I would be careful with that story. I, I, I, I, yes, go ahead. But it's also, it could be planted so that you would report it, and then they would debunk you as, you know, being a propaganda. I agree.

I agree with you. I, that's why I said. I have not checked on this. Right. And I've only. This woman, look, this woman went to Boston University, my alma mater. She was a terrier, all right? while she was at the university, she really didn't distinguish yourself in a political sense.

She wasn't in the student council, wasn't on the newspaper, wasn't protesting, wasn't doing anything. The only thing that we know is that she was dancing. She's in a video at BU dancing. We also know she made a video praising Adam Smith, which is the exact opposite of socialism. Okay. I don't need, I'm not familiar with that. But she knew that her district in the Bronx was right for her coming in and winning. She could not have known that on her own. She had to be recruited to do that.

She was. Because she had no polling information that Crowley was a weak candidate that this and that. So she is being run, no doubt. And the guy in Fort Worth is providing millions of dollars. dollars for her to do a variety of different things. But that's as far as we know in a fact realm. Bill, it's an amazing time that we're living in in the country where you can just produce candidates and they everybody buys into it.

All the world is but a stage. We're living in that time. Bill, thank you. Look, there's a lot of chicanery. going on word of the day chicanery a lot because people aren't paying attention back why because they have their smartphones okay and i want you and tony robbins this weekend to discuss that that that is the main topic of conversation and he called me by the way in the break and he's a little nervous about you coming over you tell banana hands that i'm on my way all right bill

thanks so much he's got a big buffet for you so that's a good thing. All right. Bill O'Reilly from Bill O'Reilly.com. That's Bill O'Reilly.com. Join him in his fight and his stance and his stand every day with the no-spin factor,

whatever the hell he calls it, at Bill O'Reilly.com.