Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - BONUS: It's Better For the World if Iran's Mullahs Are 'Blown Up' - Bill O'Reilly Analyzes Iran and Israel

Episode Date: June 17, 2025

Bill O'Reilly addresses those against Israel's actions toward Iran. He analyzes the divide on both sides, and the likely scenarios. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

So there's a big controversy about Israel, Iran, USA, you know all about that. But what's interesting about this is that both the left and the right are divided somewhat. I think most people support the Israeli action, but most Americans don't want the USA to get directly involved militarily. But we have a crew in the liberal precincts and the conservative precincts that don't want any of this. I'm going to run them down. I'm going to name the names and tell you what their position is, and then I'll tell you what mine is. That should be an interesting few minutes here on YouTube worldwide. So Rand Paul is the first guy. He's a Republican senator from Kentucky. He's a basically libertarian guy. He doesn't believe in foreign entanglements.

you know, you make the argument look, there has to be some kind of order in the world, and he just shrugs. It's not our job, as you used to say on Chico and the Man. Remember that show? Not my job, okay? That's what Paul believes. I think it's ridiculous myself because what happens overseas affects us. and if you're going to let

Iran have a nuke it's only a matter of time all right so he's one Marjorie Teller Green what can I say Congressman from Georgia far far right I don't really care what she thinks

I don't think she's a rational person Elise Staphatic New York now here's an interesting She just took Hokel, Governor Hokel, apart last week in Congress on the Sanctuary City thing. I mean, Miss Tephanic was just

boom, boom, boom. She's somebody who don't discount. But her position kind of back and forth about it. She's not militantly against Israel going after Iran, but he's caught. or something. It looks like she's straddling the fence here to me. Thomas Massey, he's

another extremist from Kentucky. I don't know what he's doing. I don't think he should be in the House. That's just my opinion. Now, on the Democratic side, you have the usual Trump haters that if Trump supports the action, they're going to not support it. As simple as that, no matter what it is. All right, first one is Jack Reed, a senator from Rhode Island. Chris Murphy, Senator from Connecticut, Congresswoman Tel Aviv from Michigan, Omar from Minnesota, Senator Kane from Virginia,

Bernie Sanders, you know, what are you going to say? Trump could call him up and say, you know, I really like your mom. And they go, well, she's not that great. You know. Now, do they have,

have any there's the left that what were the objections they all support diplomacy so obviously diplomacy hasn't worked we're going back to Obama this nuke stuff it worked Obama gave him a lot of money Biden gave him tons of money gave them all his time didn't work they lied about their new program according to the UN diplomacy didn't work hello we know more diplomacy. Neville Chamberlain, everyone. 1938, jeez. Overreach and military decisions.

Omar hates Israel. I don't think Bernie likes Israel, either, even though he's Jewish. I could be wrong on that. Talib hates Israel. All right, then in the media, we got four names, Tucker Carlson, Charlie Kirk, Glenn Greenwald, and Matt Taibi. That's all social media stuff. So, Carl's is the biggest name here. He's an isolationist. He doesn't want any U.S.A. being involved in any conflicts. He argues that the action with Israel serves elite

interests. Okay. Kirk, a younger guy, is an isolationist. It's against America First Principles. Kirk says that most MAGA people agree with him. That's not true. Okay? Most MAGA people continue to support Trump on this. As long as Trump doesn't order U.S. military directly in. And Trump doesn't want to do that.

I talked to him yesterday, so we're taping this on Monday. I talked to him on Sunday about it. And he does not want that. Greenwald, you know, non-invention. Taibi against the intervention. Who knows? So my posture is this, look, you've got to be cautious because of the weapons and mass destruction thing with Saddam Hussein, and the USA was wrong about that. I was wrong as a journalist.

My analysis was that because Saddam wouldn't allow the UN weapons inspectors in and told his own generals, Saddam Hussein did, that he had weapons of mass destruction by a weapon. that he did. That was my conclusion as a journalist looking at the data that was coming in. You remember Colin Powell, all of that stuff. But it was wrong. That Saddam Hussein didn't have him.

And here's how crazy he was. He forfeited his life, his own light, by this ruse. All he had to do was let the UN weapons restrictors in, and they would have found nothing, and he wouldn't have been deposed. So with Iran, there's no doubt in my mind that Iran is enriching uranium and trying to get a nuke. No doubt.

United Nations says it. Mossad, the Israeli, and they're very good, say it. CIA, NSA. Everybody says it. Namala themselves say it. They don't deny that they're enriching uranium. They are doing peaceful purposes. When have you done anything for peaceful purposes?

Never. You're the main source of terrorism in the world, funding and arming. Hamas, Hezbollah, Hootis, Al-Qaeda, whatever it may be, all from Tehran. So you're going to let them get a nuke? That doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Now, would I send U.S. troops in? No. I blow them from the air.

Blow those mountains up because the new facilities are embedded in the mountains in northern Iran. But I do believe the intel, and I believe the United Nations inspectors. Remember, they're the ones that are pushing this thing. Look, Iran is doing this, and we can't do anything about it. But Israel and the USA can't. We have to back Israel. They need certain bombs. They give them bombs.

They need intel. we give in the intel, in my opinion, because I want to keep you safe, and me too. And we're not going to be safe if Iran has a nuclear device that they can break down in a variety of ways and use it. Why wouldn't they use it? They're going to deny they use it. They're going to give it to some terrorist group. They'll blow the hell out of whoever they want, and in Iraq, we didn't do it. Okay. How long are we going to do this for? So it's better for the world if the mullahs blow up. Now, on bill o'Reilly.com, I wrote a column. And I said it's over for the mullers. They just don't know it yet. And it's true. You're going to see it's not going to go

away. All right, Netanyahu and Israel are going, look, they have sworn, the mullers have sworn, kill every Jew and a wipe Israel at the face of the earth. We believe them. So now we have started this and it'll continue. I believe. I'd be surprised. Trump still wants to make the deal, okay? But the deal has to be you got to let UN in and look at this and you got to get a rivet.

Trump believes they have, they're close to a nuclear weapon. that's what he told me okay and that's all that matters he believes it he's the commander-in-chief and he did not waver he said every report that I'm getting is that they're very close when you're the president of the United States that committed who believes that he's not going to change his belief he'll try to get a deal but he's not going to change his belief you know the mullahs days are numbered so that's what I can bring to you today thank you very much for watching me bill O'Reilly hope you go to my website bill o'reilly.com excuse me we got all kinds of unbelievable fact-based stuff there and I would

tell you this one more thing those who dissent from my point of view I'm not calling them names okay I'm there absolutely entitled to dissent. Robust debate is good. You see, you know, a lot of these guys get into feuds and I think Mark Levin is feuding with Carlson back and forth. Why? Levin believes one thing. I kind of favor his view. And Carlson believes another thing, but I certainly listened to him and his rationale. Why would you call him names? Why would you get mad at That's America. And that's what makes us a strong country.

We'll see you next time.