Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Border Bill Break Down, Biden's Bad News, Sen. Joseph Lieberman on a Third Party Candidate, an Attack on NYPD Officers Update, the Latest on U.S. Military Strikes, & More

Episode Date: February 6, 2024

Hey BillOReilly.com Premium and Concierge Members, welcome to the No Spin News for Monday, February 5, 2024. Stand Up for Your Country. Tonight's rundown: Talking Points Memo: Bill dissects the controversial border bill that has become the focus of the media. A new NBC News polls doesn't look good for President Biden. Former Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I) joins the No Spin News. What New York DA Alvin Bragg and Gov. Kathy Hochul saying now about the attack on NYPD officers in Times Square. The latest on U.S. military strikes. This Day in History: FDR and the Supreme Court Final Thought: Bill Maher and "Trump policies." In Case You Missed It: Read Bill's latest column, "Bordering on Insanity." Election season is here! Now's the time to get a Premium or Concierge Membership to BillOReilly.com, the only place for honest news analysis. Preorder Bill's latest book CONFRONTING THE PRESIDENTS, a No Spin assessment of every president from Washington to Biden. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hey Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the No Spin News for Monday, February 50,024, stand up for your country. Important broadcast tonight. And I'm going to slow it down a little bit because sometimes I have a tendency to talk too quickly. But you need to know about this border. bill. And it's 570 pages long. And on television, you will get an incredible amount of bilge. Word of the day, B-I-L-G-E. Partisan garbage. Now, we don't do that here. We don't analyze important news stories or even unimportant news stories on a party basis. We're not

rooting for a party. In fact, as you know, if you watch me over the years, I think there are our pinheads in both parties, okay? And the pinheads may outnumber the good people. So I'm a registered independent because of that. But this border bill is very, very important for a lot of different reasons. So I'm going to go through it methodically, okay? That's the subject of the Talking Points memo. So it was released last night, Sunday night.

As I said, I think I said 500. It's 370 pages long, 370. The point man on the bill is Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer of New York. There is a reason why he is the point man, and I will get there. A new CNN poll just out shows 70% of Americans disapprove of the way President Biden is handling immigration and the border. That's why Schumer is involved here. He and the other Democrats want to give Biden cover on the board. issue because Biden may lose re-election because it's a debacle.

That's two be causes, but the border is impacting the Democrats so much, they may lose in November. That's better. Okay. Incidentally, here we go. $650 million for a border wall. That's not nearly enough. And we don't know where that wall would go.

It's a little bit, but there's no. way. And we don't know how long it would take or any of that. All right. Three thousand miles of border, San Yucidro to Brownsville. All right. Now, here is the real kicker on this. Migrant crossings, $5,000 per day on a given week, all right, would allow the Department of Homeland Security shut down the border. Okay, but who's going to do the count? It's a 3,000-mile border. That's impossible.

No one could do that. So we got Eagle Pass, we got Tucson, we got the San Diego set. There's no way. So that's a fantasy right there, and that's important. Okay, they're going to stop some of the catch and release for single, men, but not nearly enough. Okay. So when migrants come over, they have to present themselves now for asylum in U.S. ports of entry. That is the law now. That is the portion of immigration law that President Biden disobeyed. Flat out disobeyed it. So they're going to go back to that.

If you are a family and you present yourself at a port of entry and say, we need asylum, you're in. You're in. For 90 days at least, under supervision. What supervision? You can't supervise that many people. Now, the cartels, they're reading this 370 page bill right now. They're going, okay, we'll bundle the migrants into a family.

family. Many of them have no ID. Don't know who they are. Certainly know in passports. So we'll bundle them up. Hey, I'm the Morales family. In. Unaccompanied minors are in automatically. And where do they go? Nobody knows. Okay. Now, the minor thing, that should happen. If children wander across the border, you can't just throw them back in the Rio Graham. I'm for that. Minors admit and then try to figure out who they are and why they're here. Okay. The bill does not detain people at all unless you're a lawbreaker or on the watch list. So it's either you can't come in and then they put you back to Mexico, whereupon the next day you try again someplace else, or if you're bundled as a family,

you're in. Does that make any sense to you? So my question is, who does this bill help? Does this help you, the American citizen? Doesn't help me. It helps some migrants. and I feel sorry for them, we've already accepted more than 10 million of them in three years under Joe Biden. Okay, can't accept the entire world's population. But who does the bill help? Who? No one. No American. And with the massive fiscal problems in New York City and L.A. and Chicago, go everywhere. Shouldn't we have a cooling off period so that these municipalities can get the migrants processed? Now today, Joe Biden can write an executive order stopping all migration at the southern border for six months. Doesn't need the bill. We can just do it, but he

won't do it because the progressive left doesn't want that. I wrote, A column on it, bordering on insanity. It's on bill o'Reilly.com, and it tells you why the progressive left wants the open border. I'm not going to get into it now because I've got too much other stuff to do. Please go there and read the column. Democrats know they are in trouble. So this bill is designed to then deflect into the Republican circles. Because very few Republicans are going to support this bill.

They can't support it. It doesn't have enough heft to make a difference. If this bill passed, the chaos would increase. There's no way you're going to do. A clicker for 5,000 people a day? Come on. The judge is already overwhelmed. Oh, we're going to speed up the asylum process.

How? How? You already got a million, what, six million backlog on it? You know, it's just a fantasy world. So what's going to happen is that the House will not even vote on the bill. Senate will, and it'll pass in a Democratic Senate. Primarily, they're hoping that it'll take attention away from Biden, put it on the Republicans who are then going to be the evil, bad people.

And the corporate media allied with the Democratic Party will then pick that up. You'll see it tonight. Oh, I'm going to go on News Nation at 7 tonight with Leland Vitterd. Okay? I know he'll ask me about how mean Republicans, but it's on Wednesday when I go on at 8 o'clock with Cuomo,

who is a Democrat. Then he's going to, oh, look at the terror. And I'll handle it. I know exactly how to handle it. Because if I'm sitting there in Congress, I don't vote for this. Because it's not good for the American people. There's nothing to do with Biden. I already told you that Biden's the most incompetent president in modern times. By far.

By far. Okay? Nothing to do with him. If you're going to pass a bill and spend all this money, $1.2 billion or whatever, and it'll be double that, believe me. that's got to help us somehow. But no. So I just want to recap, so you understand what's going on.

Bill's not going to come up for a vote in the House, so it's dead already. Okay? Number two, Biden could stop the madness tomorrow with an executive order, but he won't do it. All right? Number three, if a sane bill appears, and I hope it does, written by people who are really smart and looking out for everybody, You need to have a six-month window to reorganize the Homeland Security apparatus at the border. It's broken down. There are only so many hours in a day for these poor Border Patrol people.

And the judges say, come on. The services have broken down. You have to have at least six months of breathing room. on this thing. But the Democrats don't have six months because the election is November. And that's a memo. Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust. gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax

advantage gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401k, tax and penalty free. With billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau, you can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326, 5576, or text bill to 998899. Again, that's 866-326-5576 or text bill to 998899. Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist, and the host of the brand new new podcast, Podforce One. Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's

most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, lawmakers, and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. All right, the battle between President Biden, Texas for ages on. As you know, the governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, has put up razor wire in Eagle Pass to stop migration, which it has. You mean migrants can't get through the razor wire? The Biden administration sued the city of Texas saying, hey, you can't do it. It's federal property. We have jurisdiction. Supreme Court said, yes, that's true.

And it is, it's true, so the federal authorities can take the razor wire down. So far, they have not. Interesting, right? If not. But if the feds take the razor wire down, Abbott can put it right back up because he's not prohibited in doing that. Here's what Abbott said yesterday. Go.

The area where we have occupied this park in Eagle Pass, Texas, that we put up the razor wire, there used to be. be 3,000 or 4,000 people crossing that area a day. For the past three days, we've averaged just three people crossing that area. The point is, if we put up resistance, we show that we can secure the border. Joe Biden should not be stopping that. I agree. Okay, where is Joe Biden? He's in Vegas raising money today. It's a good place to raise money in Vegas. Over the weekend, He celebrated Hunter's 54 birthday at the Ivy in Beverly Hills. I have been to the Ivy, and I'm proud to say I did not pay.

I was taken to the Ivy by corporate moguls, and I ran up a big tab, double appetizers, you know, they were paying. Anyway, what should have happened is that the president on the taxpayer dime flies all the way to L.A. to celebrate on his birthday, we pay for that. Should have been done in private, don't you think? Not at the Ivy. Hunter Biden, very controversial right now, but, you know. NBC News, bad news for Biden, big poll.

Thousand-registered voters, Democrat 40, Republican 41, Independent 14, fair sample. I'm glad we got that sample. Remember this time last year when it was all skewed and I went crazy and said, you can't be doing this, and they all change. So I'm taking credit for that. First question, do you approve the job Joe Biden is doing as president? Prove 37% disapproved 60. That's not a good number.

Second question, please tell me whether you think Trump or Biden would be better at securing the border, controlling immigration. Better Trump, 57, better Biden 22. Woo. Better with dealing with the economy. Trump, 55. Biden 33. Woo. Dealing with crime and violence.

Trump better, 50. Biden better. 29. Having necessary mental and physical health to be president. Trump better 46. Biden 23. All right. So everybody knows that millions and millions and millions and millions of voters

don't like either Trump or Biden. And that looks like the choice. unless there's a third party. So RFK Jr., it's floating around on a third party thing, and he polls between 13 and 22%. That's where RFK Jr. is polling now, but I think he's about 15%, and I think that's as high as he'll go.

Number one, doesn't have any money. Number two, he's a conspiracy guy. A lot of conspiracies out there. Number three, obviously Kennedy's a Democrat, his own family won't vote for him. That's not good. So how about somebody else on a third party? Well, there is a movement called No Labels Party. The founding chair is the former senator from Connecticut, Democrat Joe Lieberman. Actually, he's an independent. I should correct myself there, who joins us now from New York. Before we get to the No Labels, and we always appreciate you coming on,

you're an honest, smart guy. Before you get to no labels, my analysis of the border bill, you say? Yeah, no, I think you're raising some really good questions. Actually, you've been over, and I must admit more than I have. Bottom line, though, the question is, and the way you asked it, is if this bill passes, is it better than the status quo?

And, you know, it's the old phrase that always is used on Capitol Hill, don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. It sounds to me like it probably would be somewhat better than the status quo. My guess is so long as they can get 60 votes, meaning in the Senate they've got to get some Republicans to say they want to take it up, passes the Senate. I hope the Republicans come up in the House, come up with their own bill.

Even more, I hope that our no-label's bipartisan problem-solvers caucus in the House comes up with a bipartisan bill that's better than the one in the Senate because this is a crisis I just say I agree with everything you said about the crisis I mean I'm pro-immigration all four of my grandparents

came here from Europe I think immigrants have added a lot to the country and still do but you can't you must have rules you can't have open borders and I think that I've been really thinking lately Bill about the fact that on a lot of polls

voters in America now say that the border security immigration is their number one concern. And that's really fascinating to me because, for instance, inflation affects more people personally than border security. And I think what's going on here is that the border security, a breakdown over immigration system, is not only a problem in itself, but it's now become a symbol of the incompetence of our government and the failure of the rule of law in our society. And so people are, it's part of why people are so pessimistic about the future and angry about the government. And that probably helps the out party,

which in this case is President Trump. So I guess I'd say good questions, but I hope it doesn't die. I hope they, because it's so serious. Yeah, I mean, I would like to see, I think you're right, the House should come up with its own bill. All right, but I always put myself in your shoes. So if I'm sitting in the Senate, and none matter what party, doesn't matter what party I'm in, my first concern is what's good for the American people.

Right. And what we have now is terrible. Everybody knows. But is this bill good for the American people? They would have to show me. Schumer would have to show me, and he couldn't. One benefit of this bill for my family. One.

There isn't any. Well, look, at the asylum is a great idea. People persecuted can come into the country, but it's been so corrupted and abused and made into a joke. So this does seem like it tightens that a bit. Is it what really should have? That's an excellent point. It does tighten because it says,

you have to prove, all right, that you couldn't live in another section of your own country or you couldn't settle in Mexico because you just walked through there or Guatemala, wherever it may be. But that can be, there are some parts of this bill that could be incorporated, but you're never going to get any efficiency. And you know this better than anybody on earth, Senator. You can't just snap your fingers and have this kind of an equation be pulled. into law. You've got to have a cooling off period. You've got to reorganize and at the same time

stabilize cities like New York, which are going bankrupt, paying the entitlements for the migrants, right? Yeah, I tell you, it's a really provocative, but idea you come up with, which is to basically close the border down for six months. Yeah. And I think it's a good idea. in the sense that, listen, I think it would actually be good for Biden, even though it'll upset people on the left of Democratic Party. If he would do that, it would show that he cared about it. He's been to the border one senator once. I mean, just that fact alone.

He's been. I agree. Yeah, he's taken Hunter out to dinner more times than he's been to the border. All right, let's get on to the no labels. So it's pretty getting pretty late in the game. for a third party to get on all the ballots in all 50 states to raise the cash you're going to need, mansion making a little rumbling that he might want to be interested in it, that kind of a thing. So tell us where it stands.

Okay, we're working really hard to get on the ballots and we're making progress. This is what I worry about most and I bother the no-label staff about what they tell me we're on target and we're going to do it. We've said all along that we make a decision or go or no-go after a Super Tuesday, right around March 15th, we're on schedule to do that. Now we're at the decision-making time. We're talking to potential candidates for president and vice president who we reached out to or who reached out to us. We have some really substantial people interested.

Some of them are known and some of them are not known. They'd be surprises. But I feel like we're ready to make a decision by March. And again, we're only going to do it if we think we actually have a plausible chance to win and we're not going to spoil it for one party or another. I do want to say when I say a plausible chance to win based on the bad track record of third parties in America since Lincoln in 1860, that we've got to remember that in every state in America, except Maine and Nebraska, the electoral votes for the state go to the candidates that get the majority of votes.

So if you've got Trump, Biden, the RFK Jr., Cornell, West, et cetera, you know, you could get the majority, the largest number of votes in a state and have like 33, 34, 35% of the vote. And we think right now that the kind of ticket we're looking at can do that, and therefore it's probably worth doing. But we haven't made the decision. We're going to do it by middle of March. And then if we do it, we're going to work really hard to give the American people the third choice. Yeah, and that's a good thing. Now, it wouldn't be you. You don't want to run again.

No. Right. So Mansion is right now the main focus, but you guys got other. You want to drop a couple of names on us? I wish I could, but they'll kill me, you know. But Mansion is, I'll protect you. And you'd be a good protector. Manchin definitely deserves consideration.

Larry Hogan has been a former governor of Maryland, right. A guy, Republican, a centrist, you know. And then there's some others that nobody's talking about, which we're excited about. So we'll see what we end up doing. All right, whatever you decide to do, please let us know. And, you know, I really appreciate it. I know how busy you are. Thank you for coming and talking to my audience on radio and television.

And we're now, you know, millions all over the world because of YouTube and the internet. We're reaching a colossal amount of people. And it's important they hear what you have to say. Hey, Bill, it's a pleasure for me. I really, I admire you. I appreciate you. I even read your books. I know.

Well, I'm going to say, I told you before the interview, we're off there, I'm going to send you confronting the presidents because I think that's the best book I've ever written. It'll be out in September, but you'll get in advance. Thank you, Senator. Appreciate it. Stay well. Take care. How good day. You too. Okay. This is a terrible story off the migrant thing. You know about Times Square, two police officers, 14 migrants attacked them.

All right. 14. Seven have been arrested. Five of them released without bail. One charged and one no charges. Okay. The five who were released without bail are in the wind, which means authorities believe they have. left New York, but we don't know where they are. Okay. The one that was charged with bail, and the bail was only 15,000, all right? He's got, on his sheet already, two counts of robbery and assault on a police officer, so they had to keep him.

So the DA, Alvin Bragg in Manhattan, lets the five go. He didn't have to. All he had to do is call ICE. It's all he had to do. And ICE would have detained them because they came here on an asylum request, bogus, of course, they're thugs, they're gangsters.

All right? So that's fraud. Ice grabs them. But no. No. Here's what Bragg said. Go. In Manhattan, we do not tolerate or accept assaults on police officers. I watched the tape this week. despicable behavior, it's sickened me and outraged me. It sickened and outraged bragg so much he let five of the perpetrators go.

And then nobody knows where they are. So, I'm the governor in New York, right? What do I do? I fire brag because section 34 of the New York public officer's law says, ultimately up to the governor to decide whether removal is warranted for any accused district attorney, county clerk, or sheriff. So if you are accused of dereliction of duty, which it certainly was, Hokel can fire you on a spot. Kathy Hogle, governor in New York. Here's what she said. I think that's absolutely something that should be looked at. I mean,

If someone commits a crime against a police officer in the state of New York and they're not, you know, they've not processed, they're not here legally. Definitely worth checking into. Oh, yeah, let's check into it. Let's see what we are. We have to check into it. This is what I mean. This is what I mean. These elected people in New York do not want to solve any problems.

We're going to look into it. Oh, it's despicable. It's so despicable, I'll let him go. As Trump would say, he let him go. And Hogle could fire him tomorrow. No. So what are we in New York to think? Well, we had an election, and Hogle won.

She beat Lee Zeldon. Not by a lot, but she beat him. Okay, I'll keep you a post. I'm watching this story like crazy. But I can't tell you because I have lived here. I'm born in Manhattan, raised in Levittown, and I watched this state and the city decline so much. Hey, we gotta look into it.

Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, the juicy details in the world's of politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast.

reminding you to tune into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. All right, overseas Secretary of State Blinken, the point man now.

The Biden administration says, we're bombing the hell out of all kinds of people, but nobody knows what that means. We don't know. I don't know. It's a giant desert in Yemen. It's a giant desert in Western Iraq on the Jordanian border. Nobody knows there are no reporters. there. If they were there, they would be killed. So buying, are we getting them? I don't know what

they're doing. I wish they did. All right, smart lives. So a message of the day on bill o'Reilly.com. And again, you don't have to be a member. You don't do anything. You go there, read my Sunday column, okay, bordering on insanity. You read my message of the day, Monday. Joe Biden says, No, to CBS Super Bowl interview. No, I'm not doing it. Joe won't do it. Why? CBS loves him.

They've been exceedingly kind to him. Now, I've done three Super Bowl interviews, two with Barack Obama, one with Donald Trump. They are posted on Bill O'Reilly.com. tomorrow, Wednesday and Thursday, I'll use clips. I think we'll use Trump tomorrow and then Obama on Wednesday and Thursday. Okay, the clips that are relevant to today. Those interviews were done years ago, but relevant today. Those interviews are the toughest interviews I've ever had to do because two of them were live.

The Obama interviews were live. and the Trump was pre-taped. That wasn't all that tough, but I got into it with him over Putin. You may remember that. So we'll run clips Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Thursday, but if you want to see all three, we have all three of them start to bottom,

posted on Bill O'Reilly.com. But Joe, not doing it. Nope. And why is he not doing it? Because he can't do it. We can't. there are they his wife and advisors and believe me Jill Biden like Nancy Reagan very similar a lot to say about what the hubby does they can't put him out there even in a taped interview

they couldn't put him out there because he never do it live because I don't know what he's going to say because he's in the beginning stages of dementia Michelle Obama who many believe is just waiting but I don't know she wins her second Grammy congratulations to her for an audio book the light we carry to two she got two Emmys for audiobooks now I've done 10 12 audio books I don't do any more because I don't have time but I never even got nominated and I think pretty good the audio books that I did, but I got to listen to Michelle to see what she's doing that I didn't do. You know the fix was in, do you? Out there in the Grammy, L.A., you don't think

that was in. But look, I'm not jealous. Now, the First Lady, former First Lady, didn't show up to the Grammys. I mean, who would, really, if you didn't have to be there? I didn't watch it. I watched reruns of blue bloods. I swear to God, that's what I did. All right, this day in history, February 5th, 1937. Franklin Delano Roosevelt wants to pack the Supreme Court. So Roosevelt just wins a landslide re-election against Alph Landon, the Republican governor of Kansas.

Slaughter's him. He gets elected, and Roosevelt says, you know what, I'm going to force Supreme Court justice to retire at age 70. Therefore, I can get to appoint all the new ones, and maybe more than nine. I want more than nine, I think, maybe 15. Why is Roosevelt doing this? Number one, Roosevelt didn't know in 1937 whether Congress, and the American people were going to go for the entitlement, Social Security, all of that

didn't know. And he didn't know whether that would be ruled unconstitutional. The government giving people money, welfare, unemployment, social security you pay into. But he wanted assurances that his, some people call him socialistic policies, were going to get through. He was worried about it. Okay. He didn't have to be. because subsequently, he served four terms. And almost all, seven out of the nine, Supreme Court judges were appointed by him. The Senate voted on the packing of the court.

July 1937, they voted it down 70 to 22. Slap in FDR. This day in history, okay, FDR wanted to pack the court. Back with mail and a final thought. All right, let's go to the man. Now, we got Jim. Bill, you left out one thing in your column. President Biden gave asylum seekers a fast track option to efficiently enter the USA in a way that would be classified as legal. That's true. And everybody knows it, which is why his approval rating on the issue is 70%.

Eric Eakin, Carson City, Nevada. How can all of them brag prosecute Donald Trump, yet allows the perps who assaulted the NYPD officers to go free? Because he's an idea lot. He's not a law enforcement agent. He's a far left progressive. That's what he does. Tony Padgett Chandler, Arizona, I live here.

One of the reasons we have so many people supporting Joe Biden is that people from California are moving in. It's true. Demographics are changing in the state of. of Arizona. Rodney Hampton, Crossroads, Texas. Bill, you're correct that federal law top state law. The problem a lot of people have is that federal law says drugs are illegal, yet many states are legalizing drugs. But federal law overrides that. So say the state of Oregon, which legalize hard drugs, possession, all right, if you're an FBI agent and you want to,

and you see somebody with heroin, you can arrest them. State can't stop you. Same thing with marijuana. It's legal. Okay, but if feds build a case against somebody selling marijuana, they can't stop them.

They're prosecuting federal court. Charles, as a retired high school teacher, I believe banning cell phones in schools. They serve no purpose or that tend to distract students. And they provide a tool for cheating on tests. Absolutely right. If I were a teacher these days, and as you guys know, I was one once, be no cell phones allowed in my class.

Now, if I were in public school, I couldn't enforce it. In private school, it could. There you go. Doug Wright, Caldwell, Idaho. Thanks for the notice of the news. Thanks to the notice of the news, I'm using less profanity. O'Reilly, you taught me a new phrase, what the deuce? You know, I am too.

every time i say the f word now i feel bad i do because it's crude it's crude so i say deuce or blank or something like that christine bowser our family would like to plan a trip to boston uh i was hoping for suggestions with logic so christine um you emailed me on the regular mail circuit your question is only for concierge members so i'll tell you anything you want to know about boston it's my second home but we don't do that on this band now i will answer your question because i'm doing a commercial for concierge membership because you prompted me so i'm going to give you the favor back but if you want to know about travel or anything personal go to the concierge concierge membership on bill o'reilly.com you get an email address private everything's private

and i'll answer your questions so christine you're going to boston in the summer check out marriott long wharf hotel to i stay great location a little pricey but not crazy concierge membership though then i could have given you all itinerary ron mcveen emerald of texas just finished killing the witches in record time, couldn't put it down, starting killing the SS momentarily. You will like killing the SS. It's harrowing, but important. Thank you for reading, killing the witches.

Okay, confronting the presidents, no-sman assessments from Washington to Biden. Almost finished right in the Obama, Trump, and Biden's this week. We're buzzing through it. then we have to edit it of course big big book i think it's my best book pre-order we don't charge you until we ship but you'll get it first already have thousands of pre-orders okay so does amazon so if you pre-order you don't have to pay us until we ship it you want the book get on the

line word of the day do not be a nim rod m i m r o d final thought some people think bill Mar is a Nimrod. I'm back and forth on it. I'm going to play you a cut from his latest show, which is dubious in a moment. All right, here is the final thought of the day. Hollywood collectively hates Trump. There are a few that don't, but if you are a director or a writer or anybody like that, and you say good things about Donald Trump, you will not work. So the anti-Trump sentiment is put forth by a lot of performers. And Bill Maher is one of them. I don't like his personality, that's true.

But if there's one thing that's even worse than his personality, it's his policies. So can I, let me tell you what his policy. Let's just go through the list. Okay. He ended abortion in America, basically, with his Supreme Court picks. Even Republicans hate that. started a trade board with China and lost it. He wants, in the new term, he wants a 10% tariff on all imports.

If you think inflation was bad now, what would that do? Great policy. He increased the debt by 39%. In one term, that's pretty hard. Okay, so Marr's reading off a card there. It was written form by somebody else who doesn't know what they're talking about. So Marr says he ended abortion in America. Where Marr lives in California, you can have abortion for any reason at any time,

unlimited, no restraints. And many other states are like that. Supreme Court ruled that the states now regulate abortion. Okay, so he didn't end abortion. Secondly, started a trade war with China and lost it. Not true. The American economy under Trump grew. Real wages were up 7%. Okay. And the trade policies were largely the cause of that. More things were made in America, and they were cheaper, so the folks benefited. Then he says, 10% tariff on all imports. Yes, but that's an extension of what Trump did in his first term. No difference.

He had tariffs. Then he says, thinking inflation was bad, under Trump, inflation was 1.3% when he left office. And finally, he increased the debt by 39. percent hello COVID COVID see now does Bill Moore know what I just told you no he doesn't he was handed a piece of paper and he read it because he knows that's what his audience wants to hear in Hollywood and that's the game so if you watch these shows you're gonna get a steady stream of this stuff that bears no semblance to reality at all. And I'll go back to my opening statement on the

Nostman News tonight. If you watch the border bill coverage on television, 90% of what you are going to hear will be untrue, which is why you are here watching me and listening to me on the radio right now, I presume. And thank you for that. I'm Bill O'Reilly. We'll see you again tomorrow. Thank you.