Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Escalating Hatred Towards Trump, Current Polling Insights With John McLaughlin, Key Takeaways From Harris’ NBC News Interview, and Atlantic Magazine's Anti-Trump Bias

Episode Date: October 24, 2024

Tonight's rundown: Hey BillOReilly.com Premium and Concierge Members, welcome to the No Spin News for Wednesday, October 23, 2024. Stand Up for Your Country.  Talking Points Memo: Bill explains that the Democrats are making accusations about Trump praising Hitler out of desperation. Trump pollster John McLaughlin joins the No Spin News to provide insights on the latest polling trends. A breakdown of Kamala Harris' NBC News interview with Hallie Jackson. Was it a total cupcake interview? Atlantic Magazine editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg releases another hit piece targeting Trump. Smart Life: McDonald's linked to E. coli outbreak. This Day in History: Tens of thousands of women march in NYC, demanding their right to vote. Final Thought: Bill's plea to stop with the cliches.  In Case You Missed It: Read Bill's latest column, Night Fever For a limited time, get our three latest Political Memorabilia mugs at a 25% discount. Our Political Memorabilia 2.0 bundle includes a Not Woke mug in navy, a Team Normal mug in white and our newest mug, No Socialism in navy. ORDER TODAY! Election season is here! Now's the time to get a Premium or Concierge Membership to BillOReilly.com, the only place for honest news analysis. Get Bill's latest book, CONFRONTING THE PRESIDENTS, out NOW! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hey Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the No Spin News for Wednesday, October 23rd, 2024, stand up for your country, and you do that, of course, by voting. We all have to do it if we want to be categorized as patriots. And I want to be in that category myself. So a lot's going on today. I had to pare it down. We had so much.

As we predicted, the political hatred is ramping up fast because Trump may win. And I was on Hannity's radio program today, and that's on bill o'Reilly.com, if you want to hear it. And I said that the hatred shown by the Democratic Party now, and we're going to get into that, all right. I think it's going to hurt Kamala Harris. Don't keep that in mind. Talking points memo is the subject of severe Trump anxiety. Adolf Hitler's back. The Fuhrer is in this campaign because the Democratic Party is very nervous.

They are worried that Kamala Harris is not performing well on the campaign trail, which he is not. So it's desperation time. They are trying to equate President Trump with Adolf Hitler. That's vile. If you know anything about Hitler, and I'm going to do a YouTube commentary tonight on him, this is way over the top. And in a free speech country like America, you can say it, but you really, anybody who does say it, you lose all respect for them.

I do. And you just can't. All right, and I would say that if they were putting the Hitler moniker on Kamala Harris or any Democrat. I'd say the same thing. So anyway, the latest is former Trump chief of staff, John Kelly, who hates Donald Trump, wants him to lose, is coming out again saying that Hitler admired some of Hitler's generals and has facts. fascist tendencies. All that nonsense. Kelly can't back up for a second. Contradicts previous statements that he made. It's just a bunch of garbage. But it's picked up by the far left

bolted. I think we also have to recognize, as the congressman said, Donald Trump is so historically inaccurate in his comment, right? Hitler's generals tried to kill him. They put a bomb under a table. And so what is it that Donald Trump really considers the affinity with Hitler? Trump's talking about Kim Jong. And look, Kelly said, Mark Millie said, he's a fascist to the core. He honors these dictators, and he praises Adolf Hitler. That's absurd. And it's a lie, and it's a disgrace.

So I was on News Nation this morning right after that guy, Goodstein, and I've challenged him to a debate. He'll never do it in a million years. But here's what I said. Go. And may I comment on your previous segment with Richard Goodstein, the Democratic Saraghan. May I comment? Because this is the same stuff. So at this point, both parties know that Donald Trump's running ahead in the internal polling. That means the polling that the parties pay for, but the public doesn't see. All right, so the Democrats are really getting concerned they're going to lose.

So they trot out Adolf Hitler. Adolf Hitler is now injected into the campaign. And Mr. Goodstein comes on your fine program and says Donald Trump is praising Adolf Hitler. Flat out says it, correct? Am I right? Correct. Okay. Number one, how does Richard Goodstein? know that. He wasn't in any conversation with Trump. This is reported by somebody who hates

Trump, John Kelly. Number two, what is the context of the conversation? Did Trump just get up and walk in the Oval Office and announce to his advisors? Hey, you know that Adolf Hitler, he wasn't that bad. Do you think that happened, Markey? I don't believe so. No, it didn't happen. This is all a bunch of trumped up, pardon a pun, hatred. And again, I think it's going to work against Kamala Harris, because most Americans on both sides, they don't like hatred.

They don't like people who hate. Don't like them. It's not Harris saying this, but it's her people. Okay, 13 days left, you can expect this to, accelerate into the land of absurdity. It's already there, but you'll get more of it. Trump ran a country for four years. I didn't see any sign of fascism in that White House. Did you? Can you point to one thing? And his governance that he did with fascistic, totalitarian? I can't. And I wrote a book on a man, the United States of Trump. I had access to the White

House. If you know of any, Bill at Bill O'Reilly.com, let me know. Yes, after the election was over, it was not handled well. But that's separate from his governance while he was in there. And that is the memo. All right, latest polling has, this is all that matted up, real clear politics, commas of 1%, just one. And it's all over the place. Some of Trump's, polls of Trump but they have com law, but the average is Trump won, which is a tie. Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford gold. And you can do this.

get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401K, tax and penalty free. With billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau, you can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866, 326, 5576, or text, Bill to 998899. Again, that's 866-326-5576-5576, or text bill to 998899. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays.

Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about. The juicy details in the worlds of politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

or wherever you get your podcasts. All right. Joining us now from Upstate New York is John McLaughlinney. He is President Trump's internal poster along with Tony Fabrizio. Anything new on the data front, John? Yeah, it's still very close.

I mean, you're exactly, by the way, this stuff compared Trump to Hitler, they're desperate and they're, they're, which it's irresponsible because President Trump had to survive an assassin's bullet, and that kind of vitriol just contributes to that kind of environment. But going back to the polls, what's got them freaked out is President Trump, compared to 2016, at this point in time, we were down six points to Hillary Clinton, not winning any of the battleground states. and it was a Hillary Locke. We won that race. In 2020, at this point, we were down eight points

to the average of the national polls, not winning any battleground state, and we just missed by 44,000 votes across three states that have 160 million votes. What's different today and it's freaking them out in that Donald Trump is neck and neck with Kamala Harris in the national and popular vote, and he's winning the battleground states so that when you tip the close ones and they are very close, he gets 312 electoral votes. We need 270 to win. But let me tell you what they're basing this on. North Carolina, the average of the real clear politics polls, as I said, head by 0.4. Pennsylvania, 0.8. Wisconsin, 0.4. Michigan, 1.2. Georgia, 2.5. Arizona, 0.9. So it's extremely close. The early votes are now coming in where you can count with most of

these states, the battleground states, are voting. And they're voting by mail and they're voting early in person. And the Democrat numbers by mail are down and the Republican numbers are up, particularly early in person voting in Georgia, North Carolina, Nevada, Arizona. So things are going better. But we have 13 days to go. Let me just stop you there, though, because I have some questions about the early voting. The states themselves cannot put out tallies by law until the polls close on November 5th, correct? So you don't know, you know registration-wise who's voting. I guess you can get that information.

But you don't know who they're voting for, correct? The difference is the parties, both Democrats and Republicans, by registration, we know we're getting over 90% of the Republicans. Republicans. They know they're getting maybe close to 90% of the Democrats. We have an idea because of internal polling where we stand with independence. We also know that in the states that don't have party registration, there's affinity scores based on what party we think you're in whether you're Republican Democrat or independent. So there's modeling going on where each side is saying this is where we stand today. Okay. But I want to know the law. So early voting Pennsylvania. The Commonwealth cannot put out vote totals. Is that correct? Correct. What they're

putting out is the mail and ballots that are in hand, which are over a million right now, they know whether they're a Republican or Democrat or an independent. That's all they know, though, where the party registration is. Okay, fair enough. Now, you say, and I believe it's true, there are more early voting ballots being cast by Republicans this year than there had been four years ago. Is that correct? Correct. By how much? Yeah, it depends upon the state, but it's significant. For example, when you look at Georgia, they're up to like over 1.7 million votes. And what we think Republicans are, we're running like a little ahead of the Democrats right now in terms of the types of voters who are voting

early in person. The mail-in ballots are way down because they fixed their election law that you need voter ID for absentees in early in person as well as Election Day. And you also, we got rid of the Zuckerberg drop boxes that David Plough Obama's and Harris. That's just in one state, though. Boy, all states should do that. So right now, you work for Trump. You work for Trump. You work the Republicans. The Republicans, would it be fair of me to say that they are confident they are going to win? Would that be a fair statement as it stands today? I think a lot of our friends are too confident because if you go back to 2012 on this day in 2012, Mitt Romney was ahead by a point. And he was leading in the average of the national polls until Halloween. Remember when Sandy

hit, you know, a lot of the Republicans stopped polling the week before. They didn't poll through the weekend. But the real clear politics average, after Sandy hit, Romney was flying over the affected states, just like Harris and Biden were trying to ignore what went on in North Carolina and Georgia. Now they're paying a price for what they didn't do there. But when Romney flew over those states, it was a message to the country that Obama's right. He doesn't care about the little person. Trump is out there. The differences. Romney lost his lead, the final weekend, and in the end, the polls had Obama up by a point the day before the election, on the average, and Obama won by four points, 51.

Why did Romney lose, in your opinion, just succinct? Because it doesn't apply today. But I'm just curious. What was it in the last weekend that he did or did not do that swung it to Barack Obama? What happened was the Obama campaign made him a rich guy who didn't care about the average working person. Okay, and that got through. People walked away from the election. The low propensity

plus voters didn't come out. Now, my theory, and it's based on facts, is that Trump's profile with the voters, the MAGA people, and the Republican Party, and you cited it before, that 90% are probably going to vote for him. But it's much stronger than

Harris Walls, who their support is tepid. Even among Democrats, unless you're real fanatic, progressive. When I was in Vermont last weekend, perhaps the most liberal state in the country, I didn't see any Harris Wall signs on the lawns or any of that. And see one, you go to Middlebury, which is crazy land, then you go a little, but that's it, not in the regular towns. So my theory, working theory, is that Trump is more likely to get a turnout than Harris is. It is, except in their weakness of the law.

lack of enthusiasm for Harris Walls. What they're trying to do now, and this is your original point, they're shifting to a character attack on Trump personality. And they're trying to make them, they're running ads calling him unstable and deranged. And they're trying to get him to lose it because he's winning on performance. He was a better president. And the question is, do you want four more years, like the last four years, high inflation, open borders, endless wars? Well, then you vote for Harris. If you want to vote for a better president, who will lower inflation, grow the economy,

secure the border, fight crime, and wars, then you vote for Trump. And they don't want that comparison. No, they don't want the comparison because it's in stone. You know you had more money four years ago to spend on the essentials of life than you do now. I can't debate it. All right, we're going to bring John McLaughlin back on November 4th,

one day before. By that time, you should have a prediction hand. I'm going to make my prediction on Halloween. I'm going to dress up like Chester A. Arthur to promote confronting the presidents. Make my prediction. Chester A. never had a run. I mean, he was just like, okay. I got the job because Garfield's dead.

And sat there really didn't do much. But anyway, I've got you, and I got Doug Sean. You know Doug and you guys are friends. I got you both on the day before the vote. We're looking forward to that. And we'll run down the whole deal. we'll spend most of the program on it. Appreciate it, John.

You're going to be at the Yankee game next week. I know John McLaugh is a big Yankee fan. We're pulling for the Yanks as well. And we'll talk soon, I hope. Thank you. Hopefully I got time off. Okay, schedule as President Biden didn't do anything at the White House today. I guess he had lunch and dinner and breakfast.

I don't know. He might be napping, even as we speak. I'm making fun of him because he, in my mind, and I'm the historian, I have never seen a president do less on a day-to-day basis than Joe Biden in his three-and-three-and-three-quarters years in office. I mean, Harding was bad. Harding might have done less, 1920 to 23. But it's astounding. Biden didn't know anything. Harris is going to be a CNN town hall, Cupcakesville. We'll analyze tomorrow.

We'll be fair. I got a little CNN stuff tonight, and I think we're fair. All right. So Harris is going to be on a town hall. You remember you had another town hall with Maria Shriver, but they didn't let the folks ask any questions. I mean, come on. They had pre-submitted questions that Harris could look at

and formulate an answer, but spontaneous questions. Now, come on, Maria, you know, you're a journalist. You can't be doing that stuff. And Trump is at some faith thing in Georgia, and he's holding a rally in Duluth, Georgia, the Turning Point place. I don't know. He's doing some rally.

So there they are. Now, Kamala Harris on NBC last night. The correspondent was Halle Jackson. I thought she did an okay job, Ms. Jackson. The problem with these correspondents is they don't know enough to load up their follow-up questions with facts. And I'm not saying that specifically about Ms. Jackson, but it's always the follow-up that's most important, not the original question, because the candidates are ready for the questions. Now, I picked out five Q&As that I'm going to show you about Kamala Harris and Halley Jackson.

Go. Our new NBC News poll shows that more voters think that the Biden administration policy, have hurt them rather than help them. And I wonder, are the last four years an obstacle to you in this race? Here's how I look at it. First of all, let me be very clear. Mine will not be a continuation of the Biden administration. Why not? You said you wouldn't do anything differently on the view,

so why I would have jumped in right there, wait. What do you mean you're not going to be a continuation? On the view, you said that everything was great. You agree with everything they did? Why not continue that? Anyway, I love the let's be clear. Don't you love that? Let's be clear. I'm not clear. I don't know what you're talking about, madam.

All right, here's soundbite number two. Does you sit here today, do you think the country is ready now for a woman and a woman of color to be president? Absolutely. Absolutely. And I am saying that in terms of every walk of life of our country. Cupcake alert. Question, Hallie, come on. What do you think she's going to say? No, country's prejudiced and never elected, a woman of color.

You think she's going to say that, Halley? Why bother? Cupcake. Question number three, go. What concessions would be on the table? Religious exemptions, for example. Is that something that you would consider? I don't think we should be making concessions when we're talking about a fundamental freedom

to make decisions about your own body. That's abortion. No concession. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. And this is how bad that is. As I said, many times, only three non-communist countries in a world have unlimited abortion for any reason at any time. Only three. Okay. Because most countries go, it's not right. It's not right. Morally wrong to do that. You got to have a reason. If you're going to terminate an unborn child in a ninth month. You got to have a reason. Not Kamala. No reason. You want to do it? Do it. And she even said it, okay? We should not be making concessions. We're talking about a fundamental freedom about your own body. Oh, okay. There's not a body in there, lady, isn't there? It's a body, right?

Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to tune into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all sides. especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast.

Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist, and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One. Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, newsmakers, and even the President of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. And the other thing is, no concessions means I'm a Roman Catholic.

I got to pay for abortions and trans operations. I got to pay for that with my tax dollars. And on the transgender front, roll the tape. Do you believe that transgender Americans should have access to gender affirming care in this country? I believe we should follow the law. I mean, I think you're probably pointing to the fact that Donald Trump's campaign has spent tens of millions of dollars. They're trying to define you on this.

Yes, I'm asking you to define yourself, though. Just broadly speaking, what is your value? Do you believe they should have that access? I believe that that people, as the law states, even on this issue about federal law, that that is a decision that doctors will make in terms of what is medically necessary. That's not the question.

She says, access, that means should the government pay for it? So Ms. Jackson makes the mistake of not this finding what access means. Access means you don't walk in with your checkbook open and pay the doctor for the trans operation. I pay for it. You pay for it. The workers pay for it. That's what access means. So Jackson doesn't define it, and Kamala doesn't even come close to it. Of course she believes that. And she said this tape that she believes that convicts in prison. Should be able to trans on the taxpayer dime and undocumented aliens. You don't get further left.

But now she's, oh, no, no, I want to follow the law. It's not the question. Now we go to the border. Go. Back in 2019, you stopped short of calling to abolish ICE, as some Democrats were doing at the time. But you also said, I've never called for abolish ICE. Correct. You stopped short of that. That's right.

That's right. You said we should critically re-examine it and you considered starting from scratch. Would you consider if your president starting from scratch with ICE? Let me tell you what the customs and border patrol agents need, what the immigration system needs. It needs to be fixed. I'm sorry to laugh. Okay. How? Trump, we have it with a bill in there and they vote it. You don't have. fix it. And to be fair, Republicans don't think they don't have to fix it either. Because the mass

deportation thing, not going to work. And it's tomorrow, J.D. Vance has a News Nation town hall. And I know he's going to be asked that question about mass deportations. The ACLU and the other lefty groups will block it immediately in the federal courts. And Americans don't want, you know, U.S. Marshal's kicking indoors, and it's not going to happen. You've got to have a better, more precise plan. But if you think Kamala Harris is going to do anything at all, besides give undocumented aliens amnesty, we shall do that. To stop this, sure.

Okay, and that's it. I think that was pretty good analysis of the NBC thing. If you have a beef with me, bill at bill o'Reilly.com, please let me know. L.A. Times is in dire straits. Once, one of the most prestigious newspapers in the country behind New York Times, Washington Post. LA Times is down about 30% in circulation below 100,000.

Now, L.A. County, it's the largest county in a country, I think there's, what, 12 million people, something like that? And a newspaper doesn't sell more than 100,000 copies a day? They're dying. So the owner is a doctor named is Patrick Soon-Shone. Okay. He has issued an edict that the L.A. Times will not endorse a presidential candidate this year.

They always endorse a liberal candidate. Always. Okay, in modern times. But not this year. No endorsement because the guy is going under. The paper is going to fold. And that's why I did it. CNN, the good and the bad.

Okay. Harris Town Hall of Night will announce it tomorrow. All right, here's the good. So Governor Walls goes on CNN and says this, and then CNN fax checks him and roll the tape. We want to make sure that you're able to bring manufacturing like Kamala Harris's did. We know Donald Trump lost more manufacturing jobs. in any President American history.

That's simply factual. What are the facts here? Well, if you're going to say something is simply factual, it should be factual. This is not true that the Trump presidency lost more manufacturing jobs than any other presidency. Under George W. Bush, there were about 4.5 million manufacturing jobs lost.

Under Trump, it was about 178,000. There were also more manufacturing jobs lost than under Trump, under Eisenhower, under Ford, under Reagan. or Reagan, so Trump does not have the record. It's not even close. So Walger's just lies, and CNN caught them. Good for them. Now bad for them.

So last night at a rally in North Carolina, no, I'm sorry, in Florida, in Florida, Donald Trump goes after Kamala Harris. Go. They lie about everything, and I was going to hit her really hard on the trail today, but now I don't have to because she's off. She's off.

No, I can't get home for it. Who the hell takes off? You have 14 days left, and she'll take a couple of more days off, too. You know why? She's lazy as hell. Okay. Lazy as hell.

I don't think Kamala Harris is lazy myself. I think two things. She's exhausted and she's frightened. That's what I believe. But I don't, I can't back that up with facts. observation. All right, so Trump says lazy itself. CNN almost immediately goes where it usually goes. Role. Shame on Donald Trump for continuing to peddle racist tropes by talking about a woman and a person of color using racist terms like she's lazy and she's not out here

working. So it's a racist trope to say the word lazy in conjunction with any minority at And you don't think that Trump, if you were running against a white person, like Hillary, would say the person's lazy if they went off the campaign trail? You don't think they would? That he would say that? See, now, this is cheap, and it's wrong. And if I'm running CNN, I want robust debate. I want that guy to put forth his point of view. But I don't want that.

I don't want these charges of racism when it's absurd. There's absolutely no backup for that. Atlantic Magazine, awful. Offal. Another hit job. Same guy, Jeffrey Goldberg. He's the guy that said in September of 2020, he wrote that Trump called dead American soldiers in Europe, losers and suckers.

I debunked that story completely. It's false. Goldberg never retracted. it, has anonymous sources, never backed it up with anybody, and the guys are disgrace. Goberg. Well, now he's out with another story, which is unbelievably terrible. So there was a private, army private, named Vanessa Gillen. She was murdered by a fellow soldier.

Donald Trump heard about it, offered to pay funeral expenses, but the family. said, no, we are going to take care of it. The military is going to take care of it. Okay. Goldberg then writes this, quote, an aid answer. Yes, we received a bill. The funeral of Private Gillen cost $60,000. Trump became angry. Doesn't cost 60,000 bucks to bury an F in Mexico. Attorney and chief of staff, Mark Meadows, and issued an order, don't pay it, unquote. Now that is about one of the worst things I've ever seen. If it were true, it's not true. So the lawyer for the Gillen family put out a statement.

Her name is Natalie Kawam. This is on X. Quote, After having dealt with hundreds of reports of my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have to go on the record and call out Jeffrey Goldberg at the Atlantic. Not only did he misrepresent our conversation, but he outright lied

in his sensational story, unquote. And then the sister of Vanessa, Myra Gillen, wrote on X, quote, I don't appreciate how you, Goldberg, are exploiting my sister's death for politics, hurtful and disrespectful to the important changes she made for service members. President Donald Trump did nothing

but show respect to my family and Vanessa. In fact, I voted for President Trump today, unquote. So it seems that editor-in-chief of the Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, outright lied, made this story up. Of course, anonymous sources, doesn't quote anybody by name. What will happen to him, Goldberg? Nothing. Nothing will happen to him. The Atlantic is a cheesy, cheap, garbage magazine that nobody reads, but this guy runs it. And then the dishonest, analysts on television, pick it up. Roll it.

And let me also please talk about this stuff about what he said about Vanessa Guillen. If you don't believe that Donald Trump is capable of saying that $60,000 does it cost that much to bury a fucking Mexican, then you haven't been listening to Donald Trump. So now the story is debunked. And what is Anna Navarro's penalty for? lying. She didn't know what happened. She just took an anti-Trump thing because she's a Trump hater. Navarro hates Trump. Now, Navarro is on CNN and ABC News on The View, and is allowed to peddle this hatred garbage all day every day. Nothing's going to happen to her, which is why

we have the most corrupt media in United States history. Smart Life, McDonald's Court of Parenthood, linked to E. coli. I feel bad for McDonald's. I mean, it's going to hurt him. So, 49 people, 10 states, picked up E. coli, and it looks like a McDonald's Big Mac, is that what it is? Think so. Quarter pounder, I'm sorry. Quarter pounder is responsible. That scientists are looking at the onions and the patties themselves. One person in Colorado died, coli and McDonald's is getting hammered. Very, very troubling story on a lot of different fronts. Now, why is this in the smart light segment?

Because many of us eat fast food. A lot of us overeat it. It's going to kill you if you eat too much fast food. It's in the same category of sugar because all the drinks and a lot of the food is laden with sugar and salt. It's just going to corrode your insides. Now, I'm no fanatic. If I'm hungry and I'm buying a fast food place, I might go in, but maybe that's twice a month. Tops. All right, because I'm looking at it going, I know if I eat this, it's going to hurt me. And it's across the board. I love pizza once a week. That's it. Okay? If you eat,

eat fast food, junk food, cheap food, you are going to hurt yourself dramatically if you eat it on a regular basis. Stay in history, October 23rd, 1915, 25,000 women marched up Fifth Avenue in New York City, demanding the right to vote, biggest demonstration in history at the time. Okay. And these ladies were adamant about it. They could not vote. Now, you would think that they would get after this display in, you know, 1915, all right, modern era is developing. They, you know, let the ladies vote. It took five years, August 26, 1920, when the 19th Amendment was certified. All American women had to write about five years after that demonstration. which was 109 years ago today. That's ridiculous. Okay.

Who was opposed to women voting? The New York Times. Here's what it wrote, quote. If women get the vote, they will play havoc for themselves and society. It's not possible to think of women as soldiers, sailors, police, patrolmen, or firemen. Heavens think of the chaos. So, New York Times. And we'll be back with a final thought in a moment.

Okay, here's the final thought of the day. I continue my plea to television news people to stop with the cliches. So we got the end of the day out of here, okay? We got, by the way, no more. I had to find myself yesterday. Now, we'll see. Stop it. Go.

So we'll see how that splits out. We'll see you back here tomorrow. So we'll see how that plays out. So we'll see if this move has any impact. But now we'll see how she makes her case, right? Well, we'll see. And I hear why you're saying it, Torey, but we'll see where it takes us. We'll see if she does.

We'll see how it goes. Oh, come up with something new, huh? Parrots, dear. Oh, parrots. Bac, bach, bach, bach. And the other one is, what do you make of that? I'll do a montage on what do you make of that tomorrow. It's painful for me to hear this, because we are original here.

We think before we speak. Thank you for watching the no-spin news and listening on our radio stations all across the country. I'm Bill O'Reilly. We'll see you again tomorrow.