Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - August 30, 2024

Episode Date: August 31, 2024

Highlights from BillOReilly.com’s No Spin News. Watch the No Spin News weeknights - become a BillOReilly.com Premium Member to watch.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

So we are covering the Democratic National Convention, Chicago from Long Island because it's much safer here to do that. But the reason is I've been to so many conventions, both Republican and Democrat. I don't need to go anymore. I know what the drill is. and it's easier for me to assemble information away from it. Now, as you know, we don't have a party here. I'm a registered independent. The reason that I've done that for decades is that, of course, if you are a registered Democrat or Republican,

then you have an obligation to that party. You're an apparachnik, and I don't want any obligations to any political party because my job is to watch both of them so they don't hurt you. Okay? It's very simple. And that simplicity has led to massive success for the enterprises that we have undergone in the past 25 years.

So what we have now is a country that really doesn't understand the massive changes that are taking place. And I'm not being super-silly as word of the day. They just the folks don't really know. And it's my job to bring to their attention what's really happening. going to do that tonight. All right? Our coverage of the election has been tough and honest. You know that. When Donald Trump does something that I feel is hurting the country, I say that. Same thing with Joe Biden. And that's the subject of this evening's talking points memo. Mr. Biden's speech last night, he took to the stage at about 1130 East Coast time. He's

usually in the land of Nod by then, stayed up late. But his energy level was good. You know, delivered this speech. It was on a teleprompter. It was long. And essentially, he was telling everybody, hey, I have been a very successful and even brilliant president. Go. As your president, I've been determined to keep America moving forward, not going back, to stand against hate and violence in all its forms, to be a nation where we not only live with,

but thrive on diversity, demonizing no one, leaving no one behind, and becoming a nation that we profess to be. I also ran to rebuild the backbone of America, the middle class. a commitment to you that i be a president for all americans whether you voted for me or not we have done that uh no you haven't even come close to doing that you have not helped the middle class the working class at all in any way that's the truth and i'll back it up now if you got a pen in paper, here we go. According to Customs and Border Patrol, 8.5 million foreign nationals have been accounted at the southern border. Another 3 million are called gotaways. Okay, they came over. It's about 12 million people that have crossed into the United States

under the Biden-Harris administration. That is by far in a way the biggest influence. in the history of this country and has cost close to $200 billion. We have $151 billion on the screen. That was in May, all right? And it's just overwhelmed the budgets of major cities like New York, of counties, of smaller towns, of border towns. This open border has crushed the fiscal profiles of cities, states, and counties. That's true.

Now, who pays for that? working in middle-class people. That's who pays. So that's number one on immigration. It's absurd to contend that you did a good job in that area. Secondly, the economy, personal stuff, all right? Gas prices up 38% under Biden Harris. Food up 21%. Mortgage rates up 148%. Home insurance up 61%. car insurance up 118%. Real wages, what you take home, down 2.24%. Does that sound like he's rebuilt the middle class to you? Does it? Let's be honest. All right? The average American does not have $500 in savings. Does that sound like a rebuilding of your security? So it's a disaster. But The Democratic Party is not going to acknowledge any of that,

even though they are in fact stone. They're in stone, and you cannot debate them. Okay? Now, we source the whole thing. If you are a premium of concierge member, you can get a transcript of what I just told you. But I tell you there's no debate about it. So when you have 50% of all working people in this country

that don't have 500 bucks in a bank, you've got a disastrous situation. And the Democratic Party wants to raise taxes on corporation. That is their centerpiece in Chicago. And the corporations will pass that cost along to the consumer. Now, this is what I'm trying to tell you. All right. Now, socially, drug deaths in the United States are up 36% under Biden. And that stat is low.

because a lot of people don't even report the ODs. They put them on some other, on a death certificate, some other cause of death. 36%. Now, that's again, because the open border of the massive amount of narcotics. And narcotics is the main driver of social disorder. This is an amazing stat.

You ready? 68% of convicts in county and local situations are drug addicted, six, eight, and they have no problem buying any narcotic they want, and it's cheap because of the open border. Does that sound like backbone and middle class to you, rebuilding, does it? So this is just a catastrophe of bad social, economic stats. I'm not even going to get into overseas, okay? It's not even working. doing that at this point. So there you have it, and that people are in Chicago on the convention floor cheering and screaming for the success of the Biden-Harris administration. You look at them

and you go, okay, we know what it is. People believe what they want to believe. Facts don't get it. You know people like that. I know you do. I don't have too many them around me because I frighten the hell out of them, okay? Because, you know, this is my job. My job is to assemble this kind of information. But, you know, look, Joe Biden's the second worst president of American history. My upcoming book, Confronting the President's out September 10th, will document that. When Trump says Biden's the worst, Trump is wrong.

He's not the worst. Buchanan was worse, James Buchanan. Okay? Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver. Theroux, the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold.

And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door. Or place in a tax advantage, gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401k, tax and penalty-free. With billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau, you can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-55-7576 or text bill to 99-8899. Again, that's 866, 326-5576, or text bill to 998899.

Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to turn into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. But Biden's number two. And believe me, I will lay it out so a fourth grader could understand it.

Okay, that's the memo. All right, DNC, Night 2, Barack and Michelle Obama, that'll be a love fest. Doug M. Off, that's Kamala Harris' husband, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, who has destroyed the state of Illinois. Destroyed Chicago. Destroyed. Because of that guy. But he's got a featured, and he's going to tell everybody how great it is. Now, Donald Trump was confronted yesterday by a CBS reporter. Where was he? I don't know where he was. He's running around. I think he was in Pennsylvania. Um, Caitlin Huey Burns caught up with, uh, President Trump. Go.

Why insult her intelligence? Well, I have to do that. Well, I don't think she's a very bright person. I do feel that. I mean, I think that's right. I think I am a very bright person. A lot of people say that. I don't think she's a very bright person.

And you know what? A country needs a very smart person. All right. So it's a personal stuff that Donald Trump should get away from. because he's speaking to the choir, not to the independent voters that could put him back into the Oval Office. You, watching me and listening to me on a massive amount of radio stations across the country, you are perfectly capable of deciding whether Kamala Harris is an intelligent person or not.

You don't need Donald Trump or me or anybody else to tell you that. Okay. Okay. Now, I got a guess is who I just told you. I'm going to call him, and he just wrote in on a cart. He's sitting down there in Palo Alto, California, the Silicon Valley Capitol, Victor Davis Hanson, you know him. Today, an updated version of his book, The Case for Trump, comes on out.

So Mr. Hansen is making the rounds. We're happy to have him. So you know this woman as well as anybody, because you live in California, and you've watched her from D.A. San Francisco rise up to now a presidential candidate. And I want you to correct me if I'm wrong. But I think that Vice President Harris would like to turn the United States into California.

That's her model. Am I wrong? No, you're right on target, Bill. And you're also on target about the selection historically of Governor Walts. We've never seen it. Even Bill Clinton picked Al Gore in the days in Al Gore was considered a Southern Democrat before he kind of lost his mind. And we remember John

Kerry picked Lieberman, who was to the right of him. And they all do that. Even McGovern picked Sergeant Shriver. He had to, but before that it was Eagleton who had to step down. So I don't think, and even Hillary picked Tim Cain, who was to the right of her. So we've never seen a left-wing candidate, as you said, this far left, but we've never seen somebody almost inexplicably, and gave reasons why she did but it still seems inexplicable that she would pick someone that would emphasize that she's out of touch with the american people and i think it shows you that they have confidence in a paradigm that worked in 2020 with joe biden they outraged trump three to one three and a half to one maybe they think they can do that again they kept biden who was cognitively challenged

in the basement they think that she's linguistically challenged and you're right about that they're not going to give her an occasion to reveal that. They're confident that they change the voting laws in a swing state. So 70% of the voters will not be voting on election day, majority of them Democrats. And then they feel that they repackaged Joe Biden into a moderate. That's going to be harder, as you point out, given her record, but they're going to try to do it. And they have an advantage because this is dumped on us. She hasn't been a candidate. She's never won a primary. She's never won a delegate. We only have 90 days left. And you've made another good point about Donald Trump. He doesn't have a minute, an hour a day to get off message about what you just talked about.

He's got to drill home. Do you really want to have this woman do to the United States what she did to California? She's hard left. Her running mate is his hard left. We've never been in this territory. Here are her positions. And he doesn't have time to go off to Kemp or the Attorney General of Georgia or the DNA of Kamala Harris, but he has a rich target, but he doesn't have much time to get her out and let her talk, because to let her talk is to turn people off, and he's got to find a way to do that. All right, but he still makes mistakes almost on a daily basis in his rallies. And you would think, look, it's not like Professor that Donald Trump is a dumb man, he's not. He's a brilliant man.

I've known him for 32 years, and he can absorb information fairly quickly. and he understands big picture. He's not like you and me. He doesn't research and he doesn't have a frame of reference that we, because we've devoted our life, to studying the country and the world in a historical sense. He doesn't have that. But when presented with information, he can absorb it

and he's articulate enough to get it out. But he doesn't seem to be able to control himself. And that's what the Democrats are banking on, that he will continue to do this kind of Kemp stuff, election of 2020 stuff, until the end. And that'll be enough to give it to Kamala. Yeah, I think what they're thinking is, and I think what Trump is thinking, he felt that after the debate meltdown with Biden, and then the panic in which at one point he was eight-point. all ahead. And then the conventional wisdom that Biden was still going to be the candidate because

the left had admitted they had a Spiro Agnew type of vice president that had saved Nixon for a while. And then when they forced Biden out and they put in Harris, everybody thought this was going to be even worse. But it wasn't because of the money that came in and the keeping her secluded. And I don't think Donald Trump has shifted. gears yet. He still thinks he's in the lead. He still thinks it's valuable to say how bad Biden did in the debate, how bad Biden was, how bad is. But he doesn't quite, he hasn't shifted gears to realize that Biden is irrelevant now. Do you think he can shift gears, Professor? Do you think he can? You do? Okay. I think you, you've talked to the people around him, Bill. You know that if you were to

compare them to the 2016 and 2020 cast. They're a lot more polished. They're more professional. And when you said they're worried or they are, I have talked to some of them too. And they know exactly what he has to do. And they've told him exactly what he has to do. And they've told him that if he doesn't do it,

he's going to allow him, but he's going to, we're going to lose because we've never been in this territory. We've never had anybody this left wing. And they're going to have, they may, if they win the Senate and the House with her, then I'm not very confident for what's going to happen to us. I think it's going to be a disaster. Well, that brings you to my next question. So you got a lot of billionaire money and we have been investigating and we put the people up,

Reed, Hastings, Lincoln, a lot of billionaire money coming behind Kamala Harris. Do these people not know that if this far left cabal gets power, congressional and executive power, that a wealth tax is coming. And they're going to seize private property. You're going to seize what these billionaires have in a big way. Do they don't care about that? So why do they keep funding the far-left candidates? They do because they feel so far they've never been subject to the consequences of their left-wing ideology.

If you're Mark Zuckerberg or you're Reid Hoffman or the Google people, they always feel that they can virtue signal about the wonders of teachers unions, their kids are in private school, how we need 30 kilowatt, you know, 30 cents a kilowatt power in California, but they live on a cool coast and they have enough money. They don't care. And that goes down the line on every issue. On fracking, you know, everybody's going to drive an EV semi-truck and charge up every two hours, but they're going to fly their Gulf streams or be met at the air. That's how they think. And they don't think in their wildest dreams that these left-wing politicians that they think they bought and owned will ever be able to impinge on their lifestyle. They may raise taxes.

They like that because they really despise the upper upper middle class, professional classes and middle class. They see them as trying to aspire to where they are or something like that. And I just don't think they feel that they're in danger. Some of them do. People like, you know, Elon Musk understands that these people are basically socialist. But even if they weren't socialist, we owe $37 trillion almost in debt. It's a $1.2 trillion a year to service it. Historically, when you get in that situation of 130% GDP that you owe,

you either inflate the currency to pay it back or you cancel the debt. And we saw a little bit of that with Obama when he reavert. remember that bill, he reversed the order of the creditors on those, that car deal. Yeah, there are games you can play. Yeah, but I don't. It's going to come, right. You can't postpone Armageddon. No, you can't.

And I think what they're, and I think you're right about confiscation, because they have to. They have, they have, they have said. It's the only way to do it is to take private property from those who are wealthy. That's the only way to do it because they wouldn't drill. in Anwar, and then you use the profits to pay down a debt, which is a way you could do it, but they won't do it because the polar bears might be upset, you know, or something crazy like that.

Yeah. All right. They said that. They have said that. Because you wrote the book, because you wrote the book on Trump, when he selected J.D. Vance, I was agnostic about it. I mean, I know him. I don't know him personally, Vance. Never met him. But I know he'll bill the elegy and I know

what he campaigned on. I was agnostic about it because you give the candidates a little room to select people they feel comfortable with. But now we have, we're three weeks in. I don't see him as being a plus right now, Vance. Maybe he will emerge as one. How do you see it? Well, I saw it when he did it for taking a hit because I've known him and I've met him and I like him. I thought there would be a bad three to four weeks because when he came out of the hillbilly elegy, he was an ebullation. And by the way, the people who really welcomed were the left because they said this is an authentic voice of the working class white Americans and he's telling us how pathological they are. And until he got turned off by those people who he wasn't comfortable, they welcomed him. So he said things, as you remember, when he's in his mid-30s about Trump and MAGA and all that,

that was going to be very problematic. So I was aware of that. And then he's a white male and he's a MAGA, so he's sort of like Waltz and Harris. And he duplicates Trump. But then I thought, well, once they clear that out, there are some assets and there are a lot of them. He's of all the people, I think under 50 in the Republican Party, he's the best adept at repartee, interviews, ex-temporary talk

in a way that nobody, like Harris couldn't do that, Waltz couldn't. So if he's out there every day, challenging reporters, taking questions, explaining what Trump is doing, and that's a plus. All right, well, I hope he comes on here because so far, We're not going to be a lot of progress. Yeah, I mean, it's almost inexplicable. Last question for you, we want people to read your book, even if they don't support Donald Trump, because your arguments, and I've said this on the air when you're not involved, you know, that I think you're the one of the few columnists that are better than I am. I mean, I hate to admit that, but you back up what you say.

And I try to do that too. I mean, it's not ideological gibberish. It's here's how I see it. This is why I see it. And that's most valuable. So the case for Trump, I want you to nail down in about a minute. What is the biggest thing why people should vote for Trump? Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines.

I'm Miranda Devine. New York Post columnist and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One. Every week, I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, newsmakers, and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays.

Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, the juicy details in the worlds of politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Well, he is unattached to the vested interest. He may have vested interests of his own, but they are not the administrative state in Washington, New York, or Silicon Valley. So he comes in there with an adversarial point of view.

The downside was he didn't have anybody supporting him in either party. He was inexperienced. This time around, hopefully. he will have that combative idea and he understands that the real problem in this country is the unelected we've got two or three million people working for the federal and state governments and they're not elected and they control our lives in the EPA IRS CIA Pentagon and they destroyed his first administration if you think of the Mueller investigation they probably heard him in his re-election with the laptop disinformation and all that and he understands that I don't know of a lot of

Republicans who say we've got to address the administrative state. The other thing is almost everything I support, but the big thing he's going to have to deal with is a debt. And so far he hasn't done that. And I think he could very easily. Well, the ANWR thing alone, the ANWR thing alone would generate trillions of dollars over 10 years to pay down that debt. And all that is, right.

it's not complicated you sell that oil on the world market and and that means that weakens Russia right there okay it weakens OPEC and then the profits all go because it's federal land all go to paying the debt down that's it's what he's talked about that and so that's I think he I think he's he's the only person and the other thing is he has the other side never going do it right no yes he has a finally has a regan streak and he's upbeat it's not what we can't do we shouldn't do we're we can't do this it's we're going to do this and we're we're going to try this and we're going to so that's that's that's that's reassuring that there's somebody who says we're not through yet but but believe me when i tell you Reagan listened to his advisors

probably too much because Reagan was not trump different drummer and all that so I You got to remember, Bill, you know better than I, that phrase. Let Reagan be Reagan. Remember that? Right. Well, Trump would be smart to look back at Reagan, and particularly in the debates and things like that. Reagan listened to his people.

Anyway, we wish you're welcome anytime on this program, Professor. We wish you the best with the book, the case for Trump, want everybody to check it out, easy to get. Amazon and all that. And when my book comes out, I'm going to send you an advanced copy because you're a historian I want you to be ruthless on no come on and I'll talk to you about it yeah but I want you to be ruthless when you come on I can say it all I guess so that I don't think I'm never gratuitously ruthless but I'm no no you're a smart guy and I want that kind of a debate

I think the folks would really like it too all right so thanks very much for coming on we really appreciate it all right let's go to immigration because the Democrats are trying to turn this around, saying that the Biden-Harris administration was right on the case, despite the open border, despite more than 10 million undocumented migrants coming into this country, and they were on it. And that they introduced a great bill that would stop all the manners. They did this three and a half years after the matters began, but Kamala's going, no, no, we're on it, on it, on and Trump is the guy who derailed it. Roll the tape. Our administration worked on the most significant border security bill in decades.

Some of the most conservative Republicans in Washington, D.C., supported the bill. Even the border patrol endorsed it. It was all set to pass. But at the last minute, Trump directed his allies in the Senate to vote it down. Okay, now all of what she said is true except for the most significant board of security bill. There was no security in the bill. None.

None. I read the bill. I never would have voted for the bill and I want to solve the problem. I'm not playing politics with this. So the bill would have allocated hundreds of billions of dollars more money basically to set up a bigger bureaucracy down there. More judges, more places for the migrants to go, more food, more clothing. But it did nothing, nothing to stop the millions of people trying to get in here.

No wall, no penalties. If you're caught crossing the border illegally, no penalties, nothing. Why would you vote for a bill like that? So anyway, the Democrats are trying to turn us around, and some Americans will believe it, I guess, but it's ridiculous. It's so ridiculous. And I'll prove my point now. So the Biden administration has tightened up asylum rules. Okay? And that's why the amount of people has dropped trying to get in here, but that's not the primary reason. The primary reason. areas is 120 degrees down there, okay? But the Biden administration has tightened up the rules. So border patrol agents can send people back quicker. But in association with that, the Biden administration has expanded areas where migrants can

apply for asylum. Okay, it's not just ports of entry. Now it's all across. It's much easier. And then they're letting them in. while their cases are adjudicated. So what do you think is going to happen? This is a ruse, a big, big ruse.

And it's obviously a vulnerability for Kamala Harris, trying to turn it around. The question is, will it work? Joining us now from Long Island, New York, is Alana Shetsova, who is an immigration attorney from Belarus, and she came to the United States, got legally, got her law degree, and now represents immigrants, represents migrants, okay?

So that's why we wanted to speak with her. Number one, have I reported this accurately in your opinion, counselor? For the most part, we do have certain points in existing rules that would cover some points that you made. For example, we do already have civil penalties for those who intend to. the border illegally. The trouble is they're not enforced. Also, with regard to asylum, ability to seek asylum, it's always been the case at least in 1980s, with the person entitled to off for asylum in the United States, regardless of their manner of entry. Whether they're entering at the point of entry or with people now between the president.

Okay. Now, you know this area as well as anybody because you do this for a living and people come to you and they're trying to get here legally, I would assume that your practice is trying to do this legally. But you know that in Venezuela, a third of the population has left that country, most of whom have tried to get to the United States, and now Maduro, the president there, won't accept anybody being deported back to Venezuela. So once the Venezuelans get here, and there are plenty of them on Long Island, okay? They got to stay here because their country won't take them back.

Biden and Harris didn't do anything to temper that, did they? No, in fact, during the Biden administration, they established a new program, making it easier for people from... Yeah, making it easier. So all of this is just propaganda from Kamala Harris blaming Trump for this, oh, we were going to go and say,

solve this problem. If this bill had passed, that wouldn't have solved the problem at all, in my opinion. Am I wrong? I wouldn't disagree to some extent, because I do believe that the bill is going for complete funding on the border. And I think that's something that I personally supporting. I believe that increased funding would allow it at least partially to address the problem. the border needs more agents. I know that we have a deal with more democracy. But look, look, we had under Trump, and I'm not promoting Trump in his campaign,

but there was a remain in Mexico policy where you could apply for asylum. You could apply for whatever you wanted to apply for, but you had to wait there until your case was adjudicated. That largely worked, correct? I would disagree from my point of me. The trouble was that if you are remaining in Mexico, you wouldn't be able to have the same access to justice

as when you are in the United States. But, counselor, we don't have the resources to do the justice that you would like for 50 million people all over the world. You can't do it. Perhaps, but we can't. improve the system that we have so at least we can address and help most of these people. But you know that most of the people in the world in distress want to come here. And if you allow them to come here to wait until they're, it takes five years now to adjudicate some of these

asylum claims. You're just overrunning the country with people who can't support themselves. Look at New York City. Look at all the other cities going bankrupt because of this. The Remain and Mexico policy eliminated all of that. Last word. Correct. But it's only because the immigration laws were not improved in the past 30 to 40 years. If we have an immigration inform, comprehensive immigration reform,

that would call for expedited employment associations, It would call for independent immigration judges. It would call for... There aren't enough judges in the world. They just aren't. The numbers are staggering. And that is the national security problem we have. Counsel, we wish you the best.

Thank you for coming on and debating. Nice to see you. Thank you. All right, customs officers in Arizona is another part of this. The largest fentanyl seizure in the state's history. four million fentanyl pills four million one can kill you and hundreds of thousands of people have died under the Biden administration's open border policy because it's easy to smuggle drugs into the United States because all the border patrol is worried about not worried but preoccupied with all

of the migrants coming in and they can't do both can't do drug enforcement and expedite all these asylum claims it's impossible so the narcotics It's pouring in here, and that's another open border problem here. Now, if I'm interviewing Kamala Harris, which has never in a million years, happened because she wouldn't get, she'd break down a cry during the interview. She couldn't answer any of my questions because I'm fact-based here. She can't answer them, all right? But I say to you, Ms. Vice President, does that mean anything to you?

That hundreds of thousands of people have died because there's dangerous narcotics like fentanylossil. plentiful and the numbers have gone up since you and joe biden have been in office i think it's what three 400 percent increase crazy ukraine there's a subset of viewers to the nospin news and uh premium concierge members to bill o'reilly dot com who uh don't want any part of ukraine they don't think we should be there they don't think anything like that i respect that I feel differently, and I've made a pretty strong case. So now we hear that the Ukrainian army has conquered, occupied, whatever word you want, about 400 miles of Russia itself, Russian territory.

So the infantry of Ukraine kind of march across the border, and say, okay, here we are. And according to them, and you've got to take all of this skeptically, the Russian army broke and ran away. possible because they're not the conscripts are taken out of prisons in Russia. I mean, they're not top of the line troops. So now Ukrainian soldiers are occupying a part of Russia. That's a fact. How much? We don't know.

So this is another embarrassment for Putin who's already lost, killed and wounded, about a half million in this insane invasion that gets him nowhere. Okay? Nowhere. And so I believe Putin is now wants out. If Trump gets elected in November, there will be a deal, I say, within two weeks. It sees fire. And then negotiation. You know what the game is. That's what I believe will happen. If Trump loses, it's going to be more complicated. Okay? Putin wants Trump to win. have some kind of, I don't know what they have. You know, my conversation is private with President Trump. I've asked him a number of times, what it was with the, he won't tell me. Some there, but I don't know what it is. I don't get it. Anyway, so Putin, another embarrassment, and there you go.

Smart life. So we're looking out for you, and here's the pen right here. You got to get the pen in paper. now, all right? Because I'm going to give you a good tip. It's going to save you some money. So, one of the keys for your economic life is what you buy. Obviously, right? You have money and you have freedom to buy what you want. In other countries, you don't have that freedom. But here we do. Now, the most important thing that you buy for yourself and your family is food. Because you have to have food.

And food prices have rocketed under Biden. We all know that. Now, Kamala will blame Trump for that, but that's insane and a lie. Okay. So we have investigated how to cut down you spending money on food, clothing, other things that you have to have. And we went to a one poll report. So 71% of shoppers are now. searching for bargains more than ever before, 71%.

And they spend an hour a week online looking for coupons and comparing prices. But we're going to cut through that for you. There are two websites that you should go to that will help you be a savvy shopper. First one is Rakuten, R-Kooten, R-K-K-U-T-N. R-S-N-R- as in Robert, A-K-U-T-E-N. Okay? So they help you find coupons for what you need, what you want, and they compare prices in the various stores.

So Walmart, to K-Mart, to Home Depot, wherever it may be. Okay? And the other one is honey, like the bee. thing, honey. And they do pretty much the same thing. Now, Sierra News is a source of this information. And we believe it's good information. So, smart life. You want to save money, significant money. You've got to do research now. You just can't walk into the grocery store or the clothing store or the sneaker store or any of that. You can't. You've got to search because a lot of these purchases are made online.

You can buy all your food online. Was it P-Pod and this kind of stuff? You can buy everything you want. They'll deliver it to your house. Don't even have to go to the store anymore. But you need to know what a fair price is. So, once again, Rakuten and Honey. Let me know.

If you guys check it out, let me know if you like it or don't, okay? Because I don't even know how to turn my computer on. All right, final thought. Slow down. So I've got to take some meds for, you know, the skin cancer stuff and all of that. It's not serious, but I booted it because I was rushing and thinking of other things. And I miscalculated the meds, and I paid a huge price for it. Boy, did I feel terrible for three days.

So I had to learn that lesson. So when you go in and you're doing any medical stuff, slow it down. Deep breath, concentrate on what you have to do. I mean, the Tara Dog's got all these meds. I got to concentrate every day. What I give her, when I give her. But I didn't concentrate on me. And I, boy, was that bad.

Financial work. If you're doing financial work, slow down. Okay? It's methodical. Don't want to make any mistakes. All right. I'm better now, but I blew the whole weekend. And it's my fault. You've got to slow it down. Thank you for watching and listening to the No Spin News. Tell your friends. I mean, we are just rocketing all over the world now. And there's a reason. And this is such a serious election. You know that. Tell your friends, all right? You're doing them a favor by telling them. Have a great way. again.