Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - July 4, 2025

Episode Date: July 5, 2025

Highlights from BillOReilly.com’s No Spin News. Watch the No Spin News weeknights - become a BillOReilly.com Premium Member to watch.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Well, the nation awaits the House vote on the big bill. I was on having his radio program today. He said it would come tomorrow or next week. I don't know. He talks to the Republicans a lot more than I do because I never talk to them. ever calls me. That's not true, but very few people do. I can't predict whether the bill will pass in the House. There's lots of backroom dealings going on, as you may know. The senator from Alaska, Lisa Murkowski, was bought and she voted for the bill, which put it over the top in the

Senate. By being bought, I mean that Alaska's getting a lot of subsidies from the federal government in return for Ms. Murkowski's support, and that's the way it goes. So the dissenting Republican congresspeople, they're dealing with them now, trying to convince them that is that and the other thing. How do they believe the bill will pass? I just don't know whether it will or not. Any Republican in the House voting against the big bill is crucifying his or her own party.

When Republicans don't pass this bill, the Democrats rise from the dead. literally rise from the dead. And we've been over this and over this and over this. Anyway, I hope that the bill passes. Not for partisan reasons. It gives working people a break. Across the board breaks financially. That's why I would vote for it.

I hate the pork. And it's in there. But you've got to give the folks at this point of history a break in America. If it does pass, President Trump emerges triumphant in his first six months. That is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. So let's run it down. The successes of Donald Trump. Now, his dissenters, people that hit him will never acknowledge me, but normal people

who believe in honesty, in fact-finding will. First thing is, the border is sealed. Biden couldn't do it, wouldn't do it, didn't want to do it, it and that led to Bedlam in the United States. Trump sealed the border in the first two months. So far, about 210,000 people have been deported, undocumented people, and there are currently 60,000 being detained. That's according to Homeland Security. And the NBC News deportation tracker. Wow. So that's been a big success. With the exception of the deportation. which I told you before Trump was elected was, you know, it would be very difficult to do.

And a lot of these people are questionable whether they should be booted out without due process. But let's give that a big win because the intrusion of foreign nationals into the USA undocumented has largely stopped. Very good for the country. Second one, Trump bombed Iran successfully into marginalization. The country is not nearly the threat that it was a month ago. It's a big victory. Stock market about the same, but that's kind of a victory for the Trump administration because was at a very high level under Biden.

And was that an achievement keeping the stock level high? Not really because COVID caused the massive spend. that bolstered consumerism in America. And remember, the economy goes the way you go. You spend, the economy is good, you don't, the economy goes down. It's a very simple concept. You don't have to go get an advanced degree in economics.

So the stock market's holding its own. If this big bill passes, you'll see a surge. That will happen. The bill itself, you know, look, do you call it a success you do because it buys Trump time to do the other things he wants to do? Another success, Trump embarrassed the progressive state of California by sending the National Guard to quell the ICE riots. He humiliated that state and it deserved to be humiliated. they uh governor california newsome and the mayor of uh la we're not going to stop the violence i'm not going to go and choose them of fostering it but they they don't want to stop it

trump recognized it right away no other guard went anywhere else okay uh trump's pounding the media into pudding so i'll tell you about it in a moment but last night cbs settled with trump for 16 million that'll go to his library and legal affairs. ABC, December 24, reached a settlement with Trump for another 16 million. Meta, Facebook, Instagram, settled for 25 million. Trust beating these guys. He's beating him down. He's got the power.

So, first six months, pretty good resume, right? Here's a danger. arrogance. I've seen it, and it happened all throughout history. Once the administration gets a little momentum, some people within the administration get very arrogant. And I'm seeing it now. I'm not going to give you names, but I might. I might if they're hurting you, if they begin to hurt you with their arrogance. I haven't seen a change in Trump. I haven't seen he's pretty much the same guy. but some of his underlings little taken with themselves.

It's not good. Your public servants. That is your job. Not to strut around saying I'm great. Okay, and that's a memo. So the settlement from CBS is interesting. So Paramount owns CBS. They want to sell the whole thing

to a company called Skydance. Trump is never going to approve that unless CBS capitulated, which they did last night. Okay, I told you, 16 million. Now, this is all about 60 minutes. 60 minutes wanted Kamala Harris to win the election. There's no doubt about it. You just go back and look at the transcripts, as I have. And it's all about promoting Kamala and diminishing Trump on 60 minutes.

Carried over to nightly news somewhat, CBS Morning. Yeah, but the whole news organization was behind Kamala. That is a fair assessment, backed up by transcripts. Now, the big one was the interview that Bill Whitaker, CBS correspondent on 60 Minutes, did with Kamala Harris. So Trump was angry that the promotion for the piece, that's the commercial, was different than what Kamala Harris said within the body of the story. I don't think that CBS would have lost that case in court. There is a difference, but is it egregious? So Trump sued them for billions of dollars saying you interfere with the election.

The bigger picture is what's important, and this is what I'm going to zero in and I know. So I'm hard on the media because I know, I don't think, it's not an opinion, I know that the corporate media has gone far left. It has. That's the truth. Okay. So when I watched the Kamala Harrisville-Wittaker interview, I didn't much like it. This soundbite happened October 8th, 2004. Go. Whitaker should have, bang, give me one solution you've offered in the first year of the Biden administration.

Give me one, because she always falls back on. Oh, Trump killed the immigration bill that. Charles Schumer ginned up early this year. That's what she always said. Give me one that you did in the first year that is a solution to the open border. She couldn't do it. Whitaker booted it.

He booted it because he didn't anticipate the boldness of the lie. That, what she just said from day one, literally we have been offering solutions, is about the biggest falsehood. I have heard from any politician in the last decade. And the truth is backed up by Trump who shut down the border

and stopped the illegal immigration asylum madness in two months. And Harris going, so Whitaker was soft on her. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, The juicy details in the world's politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between.

It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to tune into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all size, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. Okay, I'm going to give you two examples. Here is the softest of the soft.

to Kamala Harris from Bill Whitaker. Go. Let's shift gears here. Most basic of questions. Why do you want to be president of the United States? There are many reasons, but probably, first and foremost, I truly believe in the promise of America. I do. And I love the American people.

You know, we are people. who have ambition and aspirations and dreams and optimism and hope. No, please. Number one, she loves the American people. She doesn't love me. She doesn't love the MAGA people. Doesn't love Trump.

She doesn't love anybody who opposes her. Now, Whitaker just sat there and let her go, on and on about how love for the people and hope and aspiration, this is not an interview. It's not the way it's done. You've been watching me for almost 30 years. You know how an interview on television should be done. This is gibberish. Okay.

Now, let's be fair to Whitaker, he's been around a long time. I don't know him. Here's a hard question he asked. You're for Medicare for all. Now you're not. So many that people don't truly know what you believe or what you stand for. And I know you've heard that. In the last four years, I have been Vice President of United States.

And I have been traveling our country. And I have been listening to folks and seeking what is possible in terms of common ground. I believe in building consensus. more gibberish, okay? And when the interview subject descends into that kind of banality, the interviewer, me, or Whitaker, has got to jump in and go, wait a minute. I asked you why you change your opinion on Medicare. Can you answer that, madam?

You don't let them just go all over the place. Oh, the interview was a softball. Now, here's the worst thing. Even if that went to court, I don't think Trump would have won the Connolly Harris thing, all right? Because they would have said, ah, it's different interpretations. You can't prove there's malice. But here's how you can prove it. One name, Scott Pelly.

Got Pelley is, I think, the senior correspondent on 16. minutes now, all right? He hates Donald Trump. Remember his college graduate? He despises the man. And story after, story after, all you got to do is parade Pelly in there. I mean, it was so outrageous the last one he did. Mark Elias was a top attorney for Hillary Clinton who ginned up the Russian collusion fraud, and Pelly sainted him, canonized him on 60 minutes and used him as a cudgel to hit Trump, without even telling the audience who Elias was. Don't tell me that CBS is a responsible news agency. It is not. I worked there when it was responsible. So anyway, they've got to pay Trump's $16 million, probably more.

All right, join us now, and Dr. John Goodman from Dallas, Texas. He is a senior fellow with the Independent Institute of Nonprofit, Nonpartisan, Public Policy Research Group. So first of all, doctor, am I making any mistakes in my analysis? No, I don't think you are. I think what this bill reflects is that Donald Trump is probably the best marketer politics today, and it's very obvious that he wants to connect with blue-collar families. And when you hear him talk about it, he says no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security. That's the way he describes it. In fact, none of those taxes are really going

away. What's happening here is there is a small tax break for people with moderate incomes, and it goes away in four years. But it's a terrific way for Donald Trump, and the Republican Party to connect with people who used to vote for Democrats. Okay, but $25,000 on tips deductible. That's significant for the service industry people. It's absolutely significant. And it goes away in four years. Let's hope that it doesn't go away because those people need all the assistance they can get.

But overall, the American public, and I'm going to do this right after we wrap this interview with you, has a negative view of this bill because they haven't been told. the truth about it. And, you know, I got millions of viewers, doctor, all over the world. But it's, you know, there are 365 million people in America right now counting illegal aliens. And they hear this stuff. They're not paying attention, many of them. And oh, they're going to cut Medicaid and Medicare. They're going to cut this. They're going to cut this. This is a concerted propagandistic effort to undermine what Trump wants to do. Am I wrong? Now, you're right.

The public is being lied to about how the income tax system actually works, and Republicans have done a very, very poor job of defending themselves. Now, the way our system works is the rich are not getting away with not paying their fair share. In fact, the rich pay almost all the income taxes. The bottom half of the income distribution pays 2% or 3% of all income taxes. They pay almost nothing. The top 1% are paying 4%.

paying 40% of income taxes, top 10%, pay 75%, so we have the most progressive tax system in the whole world, far more progressive than any European country. And why is it that way? Because of Republican tax legislation. Every time the Republicans have legislated, they've thrown more and more people off the tax rolls. And Republicans never brag about it. They never go out and say, look, we've reason half the people aren't paying the income taxes

are because of us. You never hear them say that. So they have shifted the burden to the rich, and they don't want to tell you that, and the Democrats lie about it. Okay, but the Republican, their basic philosophy is lower taxes, and the wealthy, because we're in a transitional age into high tech, all right? There are plenty more billionaires than they used to be, just as there were at the 20th century, you know that, turn of the 20th century with Rockefeller and Morgan and all those people. with these big colossus corporations taking over the infrastructure of the United States, I write about it confronting evil, which is beyond September. I mean, some of these people, they call them the robber barons,

were as evil as they come, because there was a transition, and they got fabulously wealthy. The same transition is taking place or has been for the last 20 years into technology. And the founders of Apple and all these people, they make gazillions of dollars because that's happening. But the Republican Party doesn't want to punish them, doesn't want to confiscate what they have earned or in some cases inherited. Am I wrong on that? Well, a little bit. Again, what the Republican Party has done is shift the burden of taxation to the upper part of the income distribution.

Which would be that. Democrats didn't do that. Republicans did that. And through every single time they legislated, they threw more people off the tax rolls. and shifted the burden. Well, let's take the 2017 first Trump tax cut. I mean, what did it do? After it passed, we were told that was a tax cut for billionaires, right?

And within a few years, we found out, find out that the top 1% have a greater share of the tax burden than they did before the bill was passed. So that's pretty much the way tax law has gone, and Republicans don't talk about it. All right, because most of the voters are not wealthy people. both parties want those voters support. And it's not only that they don't pay any taxes, doctor, as you well know, federal government sends millions of Americans money if they don't, you know, reach a certain threshold of income.

They get checks in a form of tax credits. And so you're right, but I think that the philosophy is Democrats tax up to here have the government run the economy, socialism, Republicans lower the taxes as much as possible, even for the big corporations, and let capitalism run. That's what I think the two philosophies are. Last word. Well, that's certainly the way they talk about it. But in reality, we have a very progressive tax system. Republicans have created it, and they don't explain it very well. All right, Doc. We appreciate it very much. Thank you. Again, we'll see if this bill passes in the house, going to be a brawl, pretty interesting situation. We should know by this time

next week if we do have a new spend and tax bill. Now, as I mentioned, CNN's propaganda is now at a record level, and they don't like the bill at all. There isn't one corporate entity outside of Fox that supports this bill. It just tells you, you know, where they are. as far as their politics is concerned is what was said on CNN last night about the big bill go i'll give you some adjectives how about awful horrible and to quote our dear friend mr sir charles barclay terrible terrible terrible what are we talking about here well why don't we take a look at the big beautiful bill i got four five five not just four five different polls across the screen for you this is the net favorable rating the highest rating comes from the washington post at minus

19 points. Okay. I mean, I'm not arguing the numbers. I know what people hear constantly. Every day. And they do not hear the truth, which is why I'm so happy that you are watching and listening to me right now because we will always tell you the truth. Always. All right, American Pride, New Pole Gallup, just in time for the 4th of July. How proud of you to be in America. American. Extremely very proud, 58. Moderately, only a little proud 30. Not at all proud. Nine. Now, that extremely very proud number is down 23 points in 10 years. So in 2015, 81% of Americans were extremely or very proud. And that is because of President Trump, the polarizing effect that he has had. Second question. To Republican.

I'm proud of you to be an American. 92% of Republicans say they're proud of being American. Democrats, 36%. Ooh. Independence 53. This is extremely and very proud. Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist,

and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One. Every week, I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, lawmakers, and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode.

So there you go. Democrats, they do not like the country right now because of MAGA. The MAGA people overwhelm them, and Kamala is not president. Thank God, that would have been an unmitigated disaster. Because coming off Biden, the second worst president ever, and again, confronting the president's documents it, there you go. Now, on Friday, the Supreme Court ruled against Judge Shopping. What is this?

So when Donald Trump got into office, and this is the message of the day on bill o'Reilly.com, which is different from the column, okay? Donald Trump got into office, he wrote a bunch of executive orders trying to overturn the Biden executive orders of four years ago. When Biden opened the border and did all that, Republicans did not challenge a lot of that in federal court. They groused about it and complained about it, but they didn't go around. and try to undermine executive orders and mass. That's not what they did. Democrats did. So the Democrats would go to Washington State or Massachusetts or California, one of those,

find a judge they knew would rule in a liberal way against Trump. And then they'd slap on a national injunction. So some pinhead judge in Sacramento could stop an entire executive order for the entire country. Now, I knew this was insane. And so did you. I'm sure you did. Here's what I said on June 4th. Go. So the founding fire said, we're going to give the president the power to issue executive orders to protect the people and the people's treasury, not to abuse the people. That's what executive orders are supposed to be. Now, they are subject to review from the judiciary. But now, that's being abused to the highest level in our history.

And Supreme Court has to rule on it. And I assume they will this month because after the end of June, they take three months off. So I assume that they're going to rule and knock this crazy stuff out to some extent. Hello, Nostradamus, that's me, but it wasn't a hard prediction. Okay, but everything I said came true on Friday. 6-3 ruling, okay, the justice had limited the use of nationwide injunctions. Okay, they said that if you're a judge and somebody comes and files a petition, you can hear that case, the single case, if the person's in your jurisdiction,

which you can't issue a national, pause or anything else. So, the left went crazy, and the three liberal judges, and look, I'm not going to disparage the liberal judges because there are conservative judges, and they vote ideology sometimes too, but the liberal judges had no constitutional basis. So here's what Amy Comey Barrett, Supreme Court Justice, who ruled the majority opinion, wrote the majority opinion, I should see. what she said, quote, we will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this. Justice Jackson decries an imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary. All right. So Katanji Brown Jackson, appointed by Biden, is probably more liberal than Sotomayor, definitely more than Kagan. And she wouldn't, you can't stop this

and all. And the six other judges said, this is crazy. That's not what the founders had in mind. It certainly isn't. All right. But Judge Jackson doesn't care because she views her job as advancing a cause, a liberal cause. But again, some conservatives feel that way, too, in my opinion, my humble opinion. All right, this is an ongoing battle over the Constitution being used for political purposes, but there's no doubt it was in this case. Now, on cable TV, which has sunk into the morass, I don't think it'll ever come out of it, it was predictable. Go.

I was trying to sort out my feelings on this matter, and I came up with a quote from a very smart lawyer, And I just want to quote it because I think she was right when she said it. It just can't be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks. Justice Elena Kagan in 2022 said that, of course, when we had a Democratic president. Now, she voted against the decision on Friday. It just goes to show you that some of these folks really are hacks. What the Supreme Court is done and again stacked largely by these Trump appointees is seating their power under the Constitution.

in fact, their responsibility as a judicial branch, they're seating that to Donald Trump, who is a lawless president. No, and a bunch of bull that is. Now, the original executive order that sparked all this was President Trump's intention to say, no more birthright. Okay, so if you are born here, you are not automatically a citizen. That's what President Trump wanted to do. Now, the Supreme Court did not rule on that.

And I don't think they're going to rule in Trump's favor. It's clear in the Constitution that those words are there. If a person is born in the United States, that person is a citizen. It doesn't matter how they got here. There's no footnotes. So Senator Van Hollen, who's about as far left as you get, he's going to be proved wrong, because I don't think the Supreme Court's going to knock that out of the Constitution. It may be possible they might attach a few things for review of it.

But anyway, that has been paused for 30 days, and since the court doesn't come back to late September, I think the pause will be extended. And that's a memo. Another ruling on Friday, Montgomery County, Maryland, parents sued in federal court, saying, If the schools in Montgomery County are going to teach you about gay stuff and they're going to promote LBGTQ stuff, then we want our kids to be out of the classroom because we don't believe that on religious grounds. Okay?

And again, the justices ruled 6-3. Same thing that, yeah, if you're a religious person who does not believe that the gay life, lifestyle is accepted by your religion, your kid doesn't have to listen to that. Common sense, right? I believe. So they're not banning the lesson. They're giving the parents a right to take the kid out when that happens. So the left, of course, went nuts.

Go. Right now, this looks like it affects only books with LGBT. plus characters, but it very well might extend to science and evolution and all the other things that for some reason are up for debate in this day and age that are rooted in science and understanding, but it very well might upend what we think of is public education. Yeah, I'm not worried. Okay. I don't think they're going to be imposing evolution on the kids in that classroom.

Both should be discussed, though. You know, why not? Why not discuss the biblical point of view? Say, look, there are some fundamentalist religious people who believe Adam and Eve were there. And they wish, you know, the snake was chasing them around. That's what wrong with that. You don't say it's fact. I mean, but you know how it is.

What this is all about, this really is all about, is there are many states, Maryland, at the top of the list, that want to impose liberal doctrine on the students. What's what they want? Okay? I guess there are some states that want to impose conservative doctrine, maybe Louisiana because they had the Ten Commandment thing, but the liberal states are real active in this group. All right, this isn't funny.

South of the border, Mexico remains out of control getting worse. Over the weekend, okay, 20 bodies are found in Senaloa. four headless corpses hanging from a bridge, of course. This is just a regular weekend, okay? 27 murders on one day, June 29, Sunday. Okay, everybody's supposed to be in church, Mexico's Catholic country. 29 murders one day in Senilewa. That's one province.

Okay? President Mexico can't control it. Here was a statement for the Mexican government, though. Military and police forces are working together to re-eastern. established total peace in Sinaloa. Yeah, okay. How long has that been going on now? What?

20 years? You can't or won't stop the killing. The drug cartels control the country. Now, if President Scheinbaum would cooperate with President Trump and join forces, the two countries could wipe out the cartels. But Scheinbaum will not do it, nor would her predecessor, Obrador, who I believe, and I could be wrong, had a little arrangement with the cartels. Let's put it that way. Okay? Shinebaum have that? I don't know. Not trying to save any lives. So far, in this year, first six months, okay?

11,121 murders in Mexico. It's the most dangerous country in the world. 11,121. That doesn't count the thousands of people who just vanished. Okay, the crocodiles ate them or something. I don't know. But they're dead. Hey, Claudia, wise up.

Smart life. So, this is an interesting story. When COVID hit and people were off the streets, you weren't banned from going out. Okay, you just had to wear a mask or whatever. But very few people, comparatively, did go out. Most people, cliche alert, sheltered in place. Those who went out on the highways drove like 150 miles an hour because there was anybody on highways. That has now carried over to post-COVID.

If you go on a Long Island Expressway where I live, you got dangerous people going 100 miles an hour or more, we've been in and out of traffic. So much so that there is a public outcry here in New York about it. So, all state has ranked the safest cities for driving and the unsafest cities. Let's go with the safe cities first. The safest place to drive an automobile, a vehicle in the USA is Brownsville, Texas. Isn't that a shocker? On the border. Boise, Idaho, Fort Collins, Colorado, Carrie, North Carolina. Laredo, Texas, another border town. Olath, Kansas, Scottsdale, Arizona, Puerto St. Lucie, Florida, Madison, Wisconsin, Eugene, Oregon. Interesting group. You're the most dangerous. Boston, by far. Because Boston, you cannot drive into town. They don't have street signs. The town is, It hasn't changed its grid since Samuel Adams and John Hancock, and narrow streets everywhere, and nobody knows where they're going.

Don't drive there. D.C. second, I don't really know why. Baltimore, third, Worcester, Mass. Why? Worcester Mass would be fourth, I don't know. Springfield, Mass. I guess they're not, they're just not enforcing your traffic laws in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Glendary, California, suburb of L.A., L.A. itself. Providence, Rhode Island, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

New York City is not on the list because people aren't crazy enough to drive in New York City anymore. Number one, it costs you like 50 bucks to do that. And number two, it's insane. News is going to sit there. That's why it's not on the list. Now, here's a smart life tip. Most of us have to drive. We're going to encounter people who are insane on the road.

You can't react. And to me, that's the hardest thing. I really want to whack them. I really do. Road rage. I don't know what you call it. You can't. You can't.

So, somebody tailgating you, you pull over. Let the idiot go by. Somebody weaving in and out. I try to get the plate number. Okay? And if I see a cop or something, I'd give them the cop. But that never, what they should have is drones, photographing these cars.

And they will. They'll have to. and get these people, charge them with felonies, reckless endangerment. That's what I charge them with. Here in New York, they are impounding the cars now. Good. Smart life. Okay, Donald Trump, in addition to putting migrants in the Everglades, bombing the Iranians, and basically telling California to go blank yourself, has a new fragrance. out. It's true. 249 bucks gets you 3.3 ounces of Victory 4547 fragrance. Here is how it is described. It's for men with rich, masculine notes. And women, a perfume, with sophisticated,

it's subtly feminine scent, okay? So Trump's selling the cologne and perfume. Now this is a venture by CIC, which is a corporation owned by Donald Trump. I think he had to put this someplace when he was reelected president. His kids control the Trump organizations. They're probably controlling this. But anyway, I don't usually do these kinds of of touts, but you can get the fragrance on the internet. It's $250 for three ounces. So I don't think cocaine is that expensive, but I don't know. I'm not in that world.

If you do buy this, please let me know. Bill at bill o'Reilly.com. Bill O'Reilly. Write me an email. Tell me why you bought it. how it's going is the dog howling you know are you happy with your uh rich masculine fragrance i you know i think chester a arthur put out a cologne but i'm not sure he was a bit of a dandy president arthur was but i have to check that trump cologne so we americans celebrate the fourth

July and we usually have a barbecue you know the usual drill some of us travel and visit people but we don't give gifts okay but I think that might be a mistake so if you know someone who's really patriotic particularly a veteran or a senior citizen who served you know like that kind and they really love their country all right I'd like you to consider giving them a premium membership to bill o'reilly.com gift. And if you know somebody who's at trouble, as we just demonstrated on our commercial, who's having a hard time negotiating life, no, I can't, I don't have a magic wand here. I can't make an irresponsible person responsible. I can't do that, okay? But if you're getting

hosed, if somebody's hurting you, I can give you a pathway to solve the problem. And we can also get involved if it's at a level where I believe we have to. And we do that. Okay, we might have a staff that does that, a good one. So if you know somebody who's very patriotic or somebody who's having a little bit of trouble in life, you might consider gifting them a premium or concierge membership to Bill O'Reilly.com this 4th of July and explain it to them just as I explained it to you. Okay, Americans are the most generous people on earth. There's nobody that comes clear. close to us in our charitable giving, in our helping of our neighbors, in our concern for other people, no one on this planet comes close. And that's documented, okay, about charitable giving

and interest in other people. That is the Judeo-Christian tradition that we in America have built our country on. That is the foundation of the Constitution. So, We're in the business here at bill o'Reilly.com to inform you honestly, to help your life with information, and to help you directly if we can. Thank you very much for watching and listening to the no spin news. See you Monday.