Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - June 6, 2025

Episode Date: June 7, 2025

Highlights from BillOReilly.com’s No Spin News. Watch the No Spin News weeknights - become a BillOReilly.com Premium Member to watch.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoic...es

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Did you know that at Chevron, you can fuel up on unbeatable mileage and savings? With Chevron rewards, you'll get 25 cents off per gallon on your next five visits. All you have to do is download the Chevron app and join to start saving on fuel. Then you can keep fueling up on other things like adventure, memories, vacations, daycations, quality time, and so many other possibilities. Head to your nearest Chevron station to fuel up and get rewarded today. Terms apply. See Chevron Texcores.com for more details. This episode is brought to you by San Pellegrino Chau.
Starting point is 00:00:34 A new kind of flavor of sparkling water. The kind made with real fruit juice, a pinch of Sicilian salt, and the sparkle of the Italian sun. With no added sugar and just 10 or less calories per can, enjoy. With love from Italy. By San Pellegrino Chau now. Big call between President Trump and Chinese President Xi on Thursday morning, and we predicted that would happen yesterday. In fact, we reported it would happen.
Starting point is 00:01:20 And I knew it would happen because the president told me it would happen. As you may know, I debriefed him on my trip to Beijing, which is totally Chinese Communists I was going to do. I just want to reiterate that. Everything was up front, okay, in this thing, because that's who I am. I don't play any games. You want me to speak to you. I'm going to tell you what's on my mind, but I'm not holding anything back, and I'm going to tell you the consequences of everything. So I knew that the phone call was going to be made, and it's a very important call. We'll get to it in the second segment. The talking points memo, however, is on the growing Biden scandal. And it is that. It is a
Starting point is 00:02:06 scandal. Now, the House Oversight Committee is investigating whether President Biden actually knew what he was signing when he didn't sign the executive orders, but an auto pen did. Are you a little confused? So the president issues executive orders. Legally, he can use a machine. to sign the orders. But that shouldn't happen unless the president is indisposed. In Biden's case, it happened a shocking amount, and I'll give you the stats in a moment. So the House Oversight Committee wants to know why, what was going on, did Biden even know what was in these executive waters? It's very tough to prove, very, very tough. And Biden deserves due processes that all Americans are and, you know, the right-wing anti-Biden people are going crazy, you know, he didn't know, he did that. We don't do that here.
Starting point is 00:03:04 What we do is report methodically, and here's what we know. There is no question that all mental acuity questions surround Jill Biden, the first lady. That is beyond any reasonable doubt. She knew day-to-day the condition of her husband. Okay. She has not been called in front of the Oversight Committee yet. She will be. The following, well, let me give you a little bit of a primer before we get to the people who have been called. So on May 21st, I went on News Nation Cuomo. And I told Mr. Cuomo and avowed Democrat that this Biden thing was going to be as big as Watergate. Roll tape. Look, if you want to try to justify this unbelievable cover up that's going to rise as high as Watergate. What is the coverup? Watergate? How is a man sat there for four years? Worse than Watergate. I'll give you the last word. If, yeah, give it to me because, boy, you're killing yourself tonight. Oh, yeah. I'm killing myself. Yeah. You have a right as an American citizen Cuomo.
Starting point is 00:04:28 to know if your president is infirmed mentally or physically. I agree. The Constitution gave the privilege to the press to keep an eye on these people so that we would know their status and condition. In Watergate, they covered up a crime. Yes. If Colonel O'Connor gave a PSA test that showed Biden had cancer and kept it from the public.
Starting point is 00:04:58 That is a crime. Okay, so now everybody is saying it's like Watergate. So, you know, I like Cuomo. You know that. I'll go on his program all the time, but he was just being an arrogant ass. Oh, Watergate, oh. You wait and see what happens here.
Starting point is 00:05:16 Because you cannot cover up, right, a mental acuity or a physical situation in the White House. You can't. And it is Watergate. It's worse than Watergate, probably. The Nixon's people covered up crimes. All right, they covered up break-ins,
Starting point is 00:05:36 they covered up bribery, they covered all that stuff. Okay. So the following people are going to have to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee. Here they are. Former Senior Advisor, Michael Donnellan, Senior Advisor, Anita Dunn.
Starting point is 00:05:54 former Biden chief of staff Ron Cling, former deputy chief of staff of policy, Bruce Reed, former counselor of the president Steve Ritchetti. Now, they will all retain counsel. They know they're in trouble. And they're all going to say the same thing. Oh, we didn't say anything. When we were there, it was fine. Oh, no, he knew everything.
Starting point is 00:06:13 That's what they're all going to say. They're not going to say, yeah, I lied about it. They're not. And again, it's going to be hard for the Oversight Committee to prove anything. It will. Because there were days when President Biden was lucid. However, in my opinion, this was a mammoth cover-up. And the guy who's in most trouble is the doctor that I just mentioned, O'Connor.
Starting point is 00:06:39 He's a colonel, retired colonel, in the Army. And he was examining Biden. How's the president's health? It is. And how is this mental cognition? It's excellent. It's excellent. Is there a reason you didn't perform a cognitive test on him?
Starting point is 00:06:58 He's here every day. Okay. Now, that's a tough one. And if O'Connor did not give the prostate test or did give it and then held it back, because as you know, President Biden has cancer, prostate cancer, he's going to have to be prosecuted. Now, it might not reach that, because this is a committee that's looking at this. It's not the FBI.
Starting point is 00:07:30 It's not the Justice Department, although Donald Trump has called for an investigation, which means that the Justice Department is going to have to get involved. Because that's where it has to go. I mean, these pinheaded house people, Congress people, senators, yeah, they can ask the questions, they can embarrass people. but you need hard evidence, and it's a tough one. It is a tough one. Now, let's get to the executive orders at play. So from January 1st of this year to inauguration day on the 21st, there were 14 executive orders signed in the White House,
Starting point is 00:08:13 all of them by executive order, by Autopin, I should say. All of them, all 14. Pretty troubling. 2004, 74% of all EOs signed by auto pen. No excuse. It's an astronomical number. I don't think it's ever, ever been anywhere close to another president doing that. Why? Biden couldn't take the pen and sign the order. Does that take three seconds? Why? Okay. And now the names, all right, that you're Remember that the pardons issued the last few days of Biden's tenure, they were pretty big. All right, here's who got pardoned by Autopent. His brother James' wife, Sarah Jones Biden, sister Valerie Biden-Olland's husband John, his brother Francis Biden, General Mark Millie, and Dr. Anthony Fauci.
Starting point is 00:09:16 I mean, they're huge names, and he couldn't sign their pardons, and Autopen had to do it. It doesn't stack. Doesn't stack. So we're in a position here where this scandal, and it is, come on. I mean, if you don't know by now that the President of the United States was virtually incapacitated on certain days, and we the people were lied to about it, if you don't know that by now, you don't want to know. You just don't want to know. and this helps President Trump
Starting point is 00:09:52 because it will override the controversy du jour this becomes the bigger story than Trump banning countries and we'll get to that in a moment or whatever it may be that day and it negates the hate Trump media because they had no interesting reporting this story at all as we know now this MailChimp forific jingle is brought to you by MailChimp
Starting point is 00:10:17 MailChimp, your marketing with AI and more. Advanced automations to connect to your store. MailChimp, your marketing and booster clicks. Multi-channel campaigns now with SMS. That's lit. MailChimp your marketing today with the number one AI-powered email marketing and automation platform, Intuit MailChimp. Number one, based on publicly available data on competitors' customers.
Starting point is 00:10:41 Plans vary. SMS available as ad-on. Visit MailChimp.com. The best coast just got better. Introducing Quantum of the Seas sailing from L.A. this fall. Conquer next level thrills on the boldest ship in the west, like flowrider surf sessions, bumper cars, and soaring 300 feet above sea level on the North Star, plus more than 15 dining options on board,
Starting point is 00:11:01 all between discoveries in Ensenada and even overnights in Cabo. You've never done Mexico like this. Book your Boulder Baja adventure from Los Angeles today. Come seek the Royal Caribbean. Itineraries vary by sale date, ships registry Bahamas. And that's a memo. All right, so let's get to the phone call. We'll let the president describe it, full screen, quote.
Starting point is 00:11:24 I just included a very good phone call with President Xi of China, discussing some of the intricacies of our recently made and agreed to trade deal. Call lasts in approximately one and a half hours and resulted in very positive conclusion for both countries. The conversation was focused almost entirely on trade, nothing was discussed, concerning Russia, Ukraine, or Iran, unquote. That was posted on truth, social. Okay. So this morning, I appeared on our flagship radio station,
Starting point is 00:11:56 W.A.B.C. in New York City with Sid Rosenberg, and here's what went down on that. Go. I'm going to give you the credit. You're too, well, actually not too humble. Maybe he'll take the credit. I'm going to give you the credit for this upcoming meeting or conversation between President Trump and President. Xi, I think you going to China, you speaking in front of his people, doing what you did a couple of weeks ago, was kind of a linchpin for what's coming up next.
Starting point is 00:12:24 Are you willing to accept that credit? Well, I appreciate you standing in front of my modesty, which doesn't exist. I wasn't surprised, let's put it that way, that the phone call has been arranged. Now, I'm not taking credit for it. It was due. But what I gave the United States of America, what I gave the country, and that's exactly why I did this, I paid for this whole trip myself, was I gave a pathway for negotiations to stop the madness. I provided a vivid pathway to the hard men in Beijing, 13 of them. I said, if you follow this pathway, China will prosper.
Starting point is 00:13:17 Okay, so again, it has nothing to do with me on a daily basis, but I did contribute, I think, to the overall strategy that a deal helps both China and the United States. And not only in trade, they got to figure out Taiwan, Putin, Iran, all of that. Now, it is much easier for Donald Trump at this point in history to deal with she than Putin because Putin is psychotic. I am now 100% convinced. You don't allow one million Russian casualties, one million, to invade a country that does you no good whatsoever, Ukraine. And then you continue, despite the fact that Trump offered Putin a good deal to stop fighting. Putin's psychotic now. So if I were sent to Moscow, number one, I wouldn't go because they put me in prison, all right.
Starting point is 00:14:17 And number two, there's nothing I could say to the people in Moscow, nothing that are going to change Putin. Trump made a mistake on Putin. He didn't know the seriousness of Putin's mental condition. food's crazy okay now he can function but again you don't allow a million Russians
Starting point is 00:14:45 to give up their lives or be severely wounded in Ukraine and you don't even count the Ukrainian civilians and all of that Putin care at all no that's why he's on my upcoming book confronting evil he's on a cover
Starting point is 00:15:01 okay so I couldn't do anything there. But in China it's different because the Chinese know they need America. Putin doesn't think he needs anybody. Chinese know they need America economically. And so therefore, I think that this has a chance to tamp everything down. I hope it does. I pray it does. Okay. Okay. Headline, front page, Wall Street Journal. Now, you have to understand something. you are interested in consuming news in America. I assume you are, since you're consuming me right now on radio and television. So Wall Street Journal, in their news pages, is a left-wing
Starting point is 00:15:48 situation. In their editorial pages, they are not. They lean right on the editorial side, but they lean left on their news coverage. The headline today is law firms that appease Trump face backlash. Okay? The article is that if a law firm settles with the president, that it's being punished, some of its lawyers quit, some people won't do business with it, whatever. There is only one pro-Trump lawyer mentioned in the entire article, okay? One.
Starting point is 00:16:31 And a lot of lawyers who have helped or worked or support Donald Trump have gotten hurt big time. So therefore, the Wall Street Journal tilts it, okay, left, saying, oh, no, don't settle with Trump because you'll get hurt. But they ignore the fact that the same thing is going on by the left punishing any attorneys who support Trump. Donald Trump. And joining us now is one of them. Kleda Mitchell comes from Pinehurst, North Carolina. Today, she is the founder and chairman of the Election Integrity Network. So you, after the election of 2020, were involved with Georgia and the controversy down there about whether the votes were counted accurately. And you got hurt doing that, correct? Tell us what happened to you. Well, thank you, Bill, for having me
Starting point is 00:17:29 and letting me talk about this because it's only been one side that's been told for the last 40 years, and that's by the left-wing media, including the Wall Street Journal news pages, as you pointed out. I was a partner at a large law firm in Washington, D.C., for almost 20 years. And when after, I was asked by the White House to go to Georgia the day after the election, so November 4th of 2020. an election attorney. I practiced campaign finance and election law for many years. And so I was asked to go to Georgia and just to see what was going on and to just check out the election situation. And so I arrived there in the wee hours of the 5th of November and I started looking
Starting point is 00:18:19 at what had gone on in the election and realized that the election was a mess. And I will just say that's not a legal term of art. It's just exactly, but it is exactly. exactly what happened. So many votes that were cast and counted in violation of state law. People registered at PO boxes. That's illegal in Georgia. People whose registrations were recorded as having been what the post office records showed were vacant premises, either vacant lots or nobody lived there. And adding all of that up, basically we knew that there were more votes that were cast and counted and were included in the certified total, then the margin of victory between President Trump and Joe Biden.
Starting point is 00:19:07 So I was one of the president's volunteer lawyers, and that was interesting in and of itself because there had been this real push from the left, just like what you were reading today, where there was this big leftist push, starting the day after the election, where law firms were threatened and told that people would take their business away from law firms who represented President Trump in the post-election of 2020. So let's start with that. And so here I am a partner in a big law firm, and I'm volunteering because my firm decided not to accept payment because they didn't want to basically telegraphed to the outside
Starting point is 00:19:53 world that we were doing anything on behalf of the president. And so fast forward, we filed an election contest, 64 pages, over 1,100 pages of exhibits. And we never got a judge appointed to hear the case, which was very odd. I believe we could talk about that on a separate broadcast, podcast. But the bottom line is that we ended up, the president wanted to have a conversation with the Secretary of State because we hadn't had a judge appointed. and to see if there might be some way to resolve the case by comparing the data that was included in our litigation with the data that the sector of state said that he had in his office, but he wouldn't share with us. And so to try to get some resolution before the certification of Georgia electoral votes.
Starting point is 00:20:42 They never got it. And you believe that there was illegalities involved in the total. I think you believe that Trump won the state. Is that correct? Well, in all honesty, Bill, and I've said this to the president. I don't think we know who won because it was such a mix. And that's absolutely valid. And there you go. But there are enough questions whereby it should have been clarified. And it was right.
Starting point is 00:21:07 That's right. Okay. And so you did. You did it. You did an honest job. Correct. Do you want to mention the law firm? Name the law firm?
Starting point is 00:21:17 I'd rather not. Yeah, rather not. So you're down there on your own dime. dime, you do an honest job, you come back to D.C. and they fire you? No, what happened was that the Secretary of State in a phone call that was arranged to discuss the data that was in our lawsuit with the Secretary of State, that phone call was illegally recorded by the Deputy Secretary of State, a woman by the name of Jordan Fuchs. And she was in Florida at the time. She lied about it to the Washington Post, by the way, because Florida is a two-party consent state.
Starting point is 00:21:55 You're not supposed to record the phone call unless you have the consent of the other people on the call. And she did not obtain that. She recorded the call, then released the tape to the Washington Post the next day. And so that phone call, the president has been quoted in that phone call as saying, we just need to find 12,000 votes. As though he was asking the Secretary of State to go find votes. No, he was just clarifying how many votes were needed to overturn the state. Look, any honest broker knows that, but I'm interested in you.
Starting point is 00:22:31 I'm interested in you now. So once that transcript was released by the Washington Post, within 24 hours, the Lincoln Project, which, as you know, is run by a bunch of never-trumper's perverted people, they started posting on Twitter, the phone numbers of our offices, the firm's offices, we had offices all over the country, and telling people to start and enlisting some of our major corporate clients, which is a matter of public record, and having people call the corporate clients to tell the corporate clients to call their relationship partner to tell the partners that they were going to take their business away from our law firm unless the firm
Starting point is 00:23:17 fired me. You personally? And it literally shut down. Me personally. Okay. So they threaten your law firm. You better fire Cleeta Mitchell or we're going to take our business elsewhere. Okay. Correct.
Starting point is 00:23:31 Now, did any media report that? I'm going to reunying to my family because we're going to Burlington for the event of liquidation candidate. We're going to now same to find the best of the best in articles of liquidation. From, from the
Starting point is 00:23:46 house, and much more with offers over offers. I can't go back every day to be
Starting point is 00:23:51 how I'm going to get back because it's very great-alient to get yourself. Burlington.
Starting point is 00:23:59 Marks, Rebaugh. Wow! Your local Benjamin Moore retailer is more than a
Starting point is 00:24:05 paint expert. There's someone with paint in their soul. A six cents honed over decades. And if you
Starting point is 00:24:12 have a question about paint, it's almost as as if they can read your mind. I sense you need a two-inch angle brush for the trim in your family room. Regal selected an eggshell finish
Starting point is 00:24:23 and directions to the post office. Benjamin Moore Paint is only sold at locally owned stores. Benjamin Moore, see the love. Oh, what they reported was that I was forced out of the firm. I ended up resigning from the firm. We reached an agreement.
Starting point is 00:24:42 But what they've all reported for four years, years is that I was the attorney who tried to overturn the election in Georgia. Filing an election contest is not considered overturned the election. They didn't report that you were threatened by the Lincoln Project. No, no, no, no, no. None of that was reported. None of that was reported. No, no, no, no.
Starting point is 00:25:04 We had to shut down the switchboards in all of our offices all across the country. Clea, you know me for a long time. I've been through this. I've been through this time and time and time again. Okay? And that's why I got out. That's why I got out. Right. All right. You're right. Well, it's not going to deal with it anymore. Honestly. Right. I just I just said, so I left the law firm in January of 2021. And I haven't practiced law since then, but what I spent my time doing since February 1st of 2021, I've been the senior legal fellow at the Conservative Partnership Institute. and I founded the election integrity network
Starting point is 00:25:44 and I've been working full-time in election integrity. But every news article, every news article refers to me as the lawyer who tried to help Trump overturned the election in 2020. And it's a smear. The other thing, yes, and then within about a month, just a few weeks later, I receive a bar complaint that was fine.
Starting point is 00:26:06 I was originally admitted to the bar in Oklahoma. It's where I'm from, and I practiced law there before I moved to Washington. D.C. in the 1990s. And so I'm a member of the bar in Washington, D.C. and in Oklahoma. And so I had a bar complaint filed against me by 29 people, lawyers. I've never heard of. I've never heard of one of them.
Starting point is 00:26:29 They're organized into a cabal. Correct. Let's get Clea Mitchell. Right. Right. Okay. And then what I learned then is that that began a trend, a project. founded by David Brock.
Starting point is 00:26:43 You may remember David Brock. Smear merchant. So he finds some, he created something called the 65 project, and they filed bar complaints against every lawyer in America who in any way, shape, or form have represented President Trump. Right. And that these projects are paid for by people like George Soros. I don't know if Soros directly pay this, but that's where the money.
Starting point is 00:27:11 comes from. Brock lives off that money and he makes a lot of money himself. He makes a lot of money to destroy people like you. Right. All right, Clida, we have it. That bar complaint went on what? The bar complaint go anywhere real quick. No, but they didn't dismiss it for three years. It was fully brief, but it wasn't dismissed for three years. So you had a deal with it and all of that. Well, we're sorry, but I think you're better off now than you were and you're helping. in the country more now. I always say, yeah. I say that they, you know, they thought they'd vanquished me, but what they really did
Starting point is 00:27:50 was they made me, they freed me from billable hours. So I could just spend full time working on trying to fix the elections. And I'm very happy that this broadcast here could tell your story because that's the outrage. They just won't, they just won't tell the truth. They'd be in the Washington Post of the world. They're not interested in that. All right, Cleena, good luck to you.
Starting point is 00:28:11 If anybody ever bothers you again, you come right to me, okay? I appreciate that, Bill. Thank you. See you. Three new polls about President Trump v. Zogby, favorable to the president. A thousand likely voters. Do you approve or disapprove? 48% approve of the job President Trump is doing.
Starting point is 00:28:31 49% disapprove. Split right down the middle. Trafalgar poll, pro-Trump poll. Okay? 1,098, likely general election voters. How do you feel about President Trump handling his job? Approved 54, disapproved 46. That's a very strong number for the president.
Starting point is 00:28:51 And the last one is Atlas. This is out of Brazil, but they were the most accurate pollsters in the election of 2024. 3,469 adults, a big sample. Okay. Do you approve or disproved job Donald Trump is doing? Approve 45, disapprove 54. So, you know, there's a big, it's almost exactly the opposite of Trafalgar. So joining us now is our go-to guy on the polling.
Starting point is 00:29:27 John McLaughlin's an honest man. He works for President Trump. I mean, we've got to let you know that. He likes Trump. He likes his policies. He polls for Trump. But he's an honest man. All right, so can you explain to us the difference between Trafalgar and Atlas?
Starting point is 00:29:42 Yes, well, first of all, it's the difference between likely voters and adults. And we just posted a poll that we did last week at the same time as the Atlas poll was in the field, and we polled a thousand likely voters modeled after the 2024 election in demographics, and we had Trump's job approval of 51, and his disparate was 44. And it's a big difference because in the election, last year, you only had 155 million voters go to the polls. There was over 90 million more eligible adults who didn't show up at the polls that there's polling.
Starting point is 00:30:21 When you do a poll in a sample of adults. But what difference does that make? Shouldn't they have a right to put an opinion on Trump's performance? Oh, they can have an opinion, but it's a poll of adults. It's not a poll of likely voters. So you get the disparity. And also, when you go through the Atlas sample, they have a cross tab for voted Trump, voted Harris. But in their demographics, they don't tell you how many people that they polled voted for Harris and voted for Trump.
Starting point is 00:30:50 And that's been the flaw. We know in our likely voter polls, we used our polling as a strategy to raise his popular vote so we could sweep the battle around states so we'd get 50% of the national vote. And to Harris is 48%. and that was our strategy. So it's not apples to apples. And when you look at Atlas, yeah, they were most accurate last year because they were doing something that are replicated actual likely voters.
Starting point is 00:31:20 These polls that are coming out now where you've got, I mean, the New York Times put out a poll, they had only had 37% Trump voters. The Washington Post, ABC, had only 34%. Yeah, I know. We don't even bother with them anymore because we know how corrupt it is. They had their thumb on the scale to use a cliche.
Starting point is 00:31:38 How do you think Donald Trump is doing, though? I mean, you're seeing numbers every day. It's obvious he was successful or is successful, closing a border. Most people do support the ice raids and getting that whole thing under control. But the tariff situation is royal the American people, and I think divided it. Would I be wrong in saying that? Well, they don't grasp it as well as the tax cuts. In the national poll that we put up, 58% want them to get the tax cuts passed.
Starting point is 00:32:11 20% secure the border, 7% lower the price of oil and gas, 7% strength in national defense. But at the same time, we asked in the same poll, do you think the tariffs are hurt or have they helped? And 47% think they've helped right now, as of last week, only 38% said hurt. so the jury's still out on that it's a much more complex issue and hopefully sure but it really isn't you know why john because what it's going to come down to and this will clarify itself by november i think is whether people are paying more money for the essentials of life that's what it's going to be i mean people don't have to understand who's paying it and where that's coming from and this one's there and that's steel here and the cards are there and a agricultural
Starting point is 00:33:02 They're going to walk into the grocery store and they're going, I'm getting a break under Trump or I'm paying more under Trump. And that's what's going to decide it. Am I wrong? No, you're exactly right. And that's why the tariffs issue is secondary and much, much less important than passing the tax cuts. Because if we don't pass the tax cuts, only half the voters know this. We know this for our appalling. The Trump tax cuts lapse this year.
Starting point is 00:33:32 And everybody pays more. There's no doubt about it. So it is a vital thing, and that's why Trump is behind it so hard. I think he's going to get it passed, but there's going to be some Senate modifications. And Trump will live with that. He knows he has to negotiate it. But the Democrats have downside too here, because if they vote and block not to pass it, then easily that anger, when people's taxes.
Starting point is 00:34:02 go up can be transferred to the Democratic Party, right? Right, but hopefully the taxes never go up, but the Democrats, every Democrat in the Senate and the House, is on record as voting against extending the tax cuts. So they've all voted for the largest tax increase in the history of the amount. And we've got to hold them accountable. It's crazy. And they hide behind this ridiculous, oh, we just want to tax the rich. But it isn't that. It's everybody.
Starting point is 00:34:30 and you know it's the same thing about Medicaid oh they want to throw people up Medicaid no they want to regulate it they want to refine it but anyway political lies are you know they're never ending last question for you I think President Trump would have been better if he had not done so much so fast it would have been easier for him to convince the American people of why he's doing what he's doing. But because the change has been so massive, because the Biden administration was so horrible, that it all came at once. And it's almost too much for the average person who doesn't do what you and I do for a living to grasp it. Flying first class with Alaska
Starting point is 00:35:18 Airlines isn't just about getting there. It's about enjoying the journey. Stretch out with industry leading leg room, sink into an adjustable headrest, and cozy up with a custom-fill- blanket on long flights, savor hot fresh meals, never frozen, and sip on our custom stump town coffee, brewed to taste great at 30,000 feet. Upgrade your next trip. Book now at Alaskaair.com. Put us in a box. Go ahead. That just gives us something to break out of, because the next generation 2025 GMC terrain elevation is raising the standard of what comes standard as far as expectations go why meet them when you can shatter them what we choose to challenge we challenge completely we are professional grade visit gmc.com to learn more so they're more
Starting point is 00:36:14 subjected to propaganda so if he had just not done and just incrementally done it i think you'd be in a stronger position do you agree uh you may be right but it's hard to get him to do that you know him personality-wise. Yeah, I know. Biden left the country in such a mess. He has a 40 favorable, 56 unfavorable, I last ball. The guy left such a mess that Trump, you know, he's got to solve wars in Ukraine, the Middle East, secure the border, and try to get the economy to grow all at the same time.
Starting point is 00:36:47 And you're dealing with the president now who has survived two assassination attempts after they tried to put him in jail. So if we don't get the Trump tax cut passed, have a government. growing economy and we lose control of the House and the midterms, then we've got a big problem because they'll impeach him again. Yeah, for sure. I'm writing about that and my message today tomorrow about the midterms and now how it's starting to shape up.
Starting point is 00:37:13 So, John, look, if you see any trends, just do me a favor. Let us know about the president, both pro and con, because I think our audience is very, we're numbers people here. We don't want the propaganda. We want the hard numbers. And we really appreciate it, as always. Thanks for helping us out. Okay, Boulder, that guy who attacked an anti-Semitic guy,
Starting point is 00:37:38 Mohammed Sabri, Soleiman, overseed his visa. And then did the Biden con, oh, I want asylum. And the Biden people said, sure, they kept him in the country. It's just so bad. I can't tell you how bad Biden was. And once again, the Chinese had no use for him at all. None. Okay. But here's what I said about Biden's not enforcing immigration law. And I said this on June 12, 24, about a year ago. Go. Do I believe there are terrorists here right now plotting to kill us? Yes. Do I believe they came across the open border between the USA and Mexico? Yes, I do. That's why I would never, under any circumstances, even consider voting for Joe Biden. going to see more, unfortunately, of people who were here got in under Biden failing to obey
Starting point is 00:38:33 the law and boom. Just a note to my producers, we'll do the sanctuary city tomorrow. I want to spend a little time on that. The Trump administration put out a list of sanctuary counties and cities that they're going after. We'll do it tomorrow. Along with Washington, D.C. is receding now saying, well, maybe we don't want to be a sanctuary place. PBS NPR are suing. Trump because Trump says, we're not going to give you $55 billion anymore. It's exactly the same as the universities. Exactly the same. So PBS and NBR are just left wing. And we're paying for it. No. No. Now they say, oh, well, we're going to see you because it's violation of freedom of speech. And then the loopy person who runs NPR, Catherine Marr, says this. Go.
Starting point is 00:39:27 our editor, Yuri Berliner. He accused the network of having what he called a lack of viewpoint diversity. How do you respond to those critiques? Well, I first of all respond by saying we're a nonpartisan news organization. We seek to be able to provide a range of different viewpoints in terms of who we bring on air, the stories that we tell. It's just bull. You know, it really is. She knows what she's saying isn't true. Okay. I don't know whether she'll lose in a bubble, and I don't care. But anybody who listens to NPR, watches PBS, anybody, five years old, you would know.
Starting point is 00:40:02 Ukraine attacked Russian aircraft within Russia, five different bases, blew up a whole bunch of planes, another embarrassment for Putin. Doesn't really care. And it's Istanbul, Ukraine things, living nowhere. I don't know if Trump can get Putin.
Starting point is 00:40:19 I think Putin may be so psychologically damaged at this point. I'm not sure. But my thrust in Beijing was don't get in bed with Putin. Things are not going to end well for Putin. You heard it here. New York City has an epidemic of thugs, violent thugs attacking police. No question. Why wouldn't you? You're not held accountable. Two guys beat up two cops in the Bronx, 16 adjournments, 1-6, going on for a year and a half. Still hasn't gotten into court. Big headline in New York Post, oh, the cops are getting into cops. Of course, of course what's going to happen.
Starting point is 00:41:07 More crazy stuff from the progressives who control New York City and State. Assaults on cops, the ones that I had, are up 63% in six years. Smart Life. Okay. Let me just put this over here. Smart Life. Told you, when the tariff stuff starts, don't sell stocks. Hold in. Remember that, right? So those of you follow my advice in Smart Life segment, you got your money back, unless you had terrible stocks. Now I'm starting to sell some of my stocks. Not all of them, but the ones that are speculative, and I'll tell you why. I don't think that this turbulence in the world, with China, with Ukraine, Putin, Iran, I think they're going to have to surrender the mullahs. But this economic war, and this is not going to be short term. And it goes up and it goes down and it goes in and it goes out. It's your money, my money, I work hard for it. I'm trimming back a bit.
Starting point is 00:42:15 now right away i'm watching smart life i got to be honest with you that's what we do here all right i'm not panicking i'm keeping my core but the more speculative i'm selling bill's book club if over can have one why can't i um killing lincoln is our best seller of all the books more than three million copies that was our first one there's a new book on lincoln out called 1861, the lost peace. It's by Jay Winnick. So if you're a Lincoln Civil War person, you want to check out Jay's work. That's the Bill's Book Club. Okay, so the Fourth Commandment, some say the Fifth, but in my religion, Catholicism, and in the Torah, I believe, the Fourth Commandment is honor thy father and their mother. And it's problematic because
Starting point is 00:43:10 there are a lot of fathers and mothers who are not good. Let's be honest. They're not. They treat their children well. They don't treat each other well. They're just not good. Do you still have to honor them? The answer is yes. We have to be respectful.
Starting point is 00:43:24 You don't have to embrace. You don't have to make excuses. You don't have to pander. Respectful. On their respective days, you give them gifts. You send them a card. Don't overdo it if you don't feel they deserve it. But most parents, you know, my parents were flawed.
Starting point is 00:43:40 They were children of the depression. But I love them and I respect. I loved them and I respected them to the very end. And I did everything on earth I could do to make their lives easier. And I didn't, I wasn't a scorecard. They did this, they did that. I didn't do that because I honored the Fourth Commandment. I mean, you know, it's pretty clear.
Starting point is 00:44:03 Now, sometimes you can't honor. Sometimes the destructive nature of parents is so bad that you can't. I understand that. and millions of people are facing it. I got it. But if you can form some kind of kindness of d'aunt, try. You'll be a much better person for it. Thank you for watching and listening to the No Spin News.
Starting point is 00:44:33 New Sunday column. See again on Monday.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.