Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - May 23, 2025

Episode Date: May 24, 2025

Highlights from BillOReilly.com’s No Spin News. Watch the No Spin News weeknights - become a BillOReilly.com Premium Member to watch.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Second half of the year, which is really, boy, I think it's the most important part of Donald Trump's presidency, both his full first term and this term. If he turns that economy around, if it's booming by October, he goes into Reagan territory. Now, I'm not going to bore you with what happened to Ronald Reagan after Jimmy Carter, but it's so similar to what happened to Donald Trump after Joe Biden. It's almost the same thing. If you want to know, my book, Killing Reagan is the book. But it took Reagan a long time to get out of that Carter Quagmire.

But in the second term, he's roaring. And that's going to happen faster because Donald Trump is a much more aggressive president than Ronald Reagan was. So anyway, a fascinating conversation. I never know when these things are going to happen. It's not like I get a heads up. You know, be available at 10 a.m. O'Reilly for the most powerful man in the world. Phone rings. I looked out at the phone and there it is.

And so I got to be on my game all the time. And that's what I try to be. Talking about a legal victory for the Trump administration, at least temporarily, on this trans-military. stuff. Now, you may not think that's so important, but it is, because you have to take the temple of the Supreme Court. All of this stuff about blocking deportations, about tariffs, about denying ideological concerns like Harvard and NPR, PBS, money, all going to come down to the Supreme Court. So you need to know what the justices are thinking, and this is an

interesting ruling. So on January 27, 2000, 25, President Trump issued an executive order, quote, adoption of a gender identity inconsistent with an individual sex conflicts with a soldier's commitment to an honorable, truthful, and disciplined lifestyle, even to one's personal life. A man's assertion, he is a woman, and his requirement that others honor this falsehood is not consistent with humility and selflessness required of a service member, unquote. That is pretty harsh, but if you are going to, to run a military that consists of 1.2 million service people, you got to have discipline,

okay? And in this country, we have spent since 2015 $52 million on so-called gender-affirming care in the military, $52 million. I wouldn't pay a dollar. Not a dollar. If somebody enlists in the armed services, and you're not drafted, we don't have that here, and then they decide to become the other sex, okay, you just resign, get a general discharge. That's all, you know, I want to pay for it. I don't want to pay for anybody's gender affirming care. I mean, maybe I'm a mean guy, but that's not on me. And I don't expect anybody to pay whatever I decided to do in my private life, either. Okay? The other thing, is that if you are the commander-in-chief, then you get to run the military the way you want.

Okay? It's not subject to congressional approval. Only war, declaration of war is. But the way you run, you're the commander-in-chief. So anyway, Supreme Court issued an emergency lift of a block that bans transgender in a military. So it's lifting. it. Okay, so for right now, if you're transgender, you can't be in the military. And if you're already there, I don't know what you do. But I guess you decide to pack it up. Now, Supreme Court said, look, we're not going to issue a written decree on this, and they did not. We're going to kick it back to the lower federal courts for their ruling, and then we'll take it up again. That's where it is. Okay, so the three liberal justices, Sotomayor, Kagan, and Brown Jackson,

made it clear that they were dissenting, that they want this block on it. Okay, that's not a surprise. And then the Democratic Party, per se, opposes it the ban on transgenders in the military as well. Roll the tape. Frankly, the military has more things to worry about than the handful of transgender service members being, you know, than this going out there and discriminating against transgender service members. I don't think, I mean, look, I, the military does have more important things to worry about, but this shouldn't be happening, okay? I mean, you can't have chaos in the barracks and

she should know, you know, Senator Duckworth is an honored veteran of this country. She should know better, but politics over sees everything else. Summing up, you got to take the tempo at the Supreme Court. You have to, because Donald Trump's administration is utterly dependent on that body to go forward with what it wants to do. And that's the memo. Another media phony controversy over obeying the Constitution. Tries me crazy. So you'll remember dictator on first day, right? When Trump said that about the car industry, and then the Democrats ran out and said he's going to be a dictator. He's going to be Hitler. And you'll remember good people on both sides and they ran out and said, oh, Trump's calling the Nazis,

good people when he was saying the good people on both sides of the Confederate statute debate. So you remember those. They were vivid. They were lies. And the media just does this all day long. So now we have another one. It all starts on Sunday. Meet the press. Kirsten Welker. Go. Don't you need to uphold the Constitution of the United States as president? I don't know. I have to respond by saying again, I have brilliant lawyers that work for me. and they are going to obviously follow what the Supreme Court said. What you said is not what I heard, the Supreme Court said. They're talking about undocumented aliens and due process.

So they take the, I don't know, do you need to uphold the Constitution of the United as president? And I don't know. But he's not talking about upholding the entire Constitution. He's talking about one controversy, which if you saw the whole interview, you would know. But the press just, boom, takes it right out of there. Okay?

And it just makes me so sick because it carries over into Congress. So we have Congresswoman Lauren Underwood out of Illinois, suburbs of Chicago. She shows up yesterday to grill Secretary of Homeland Security Christy Nome about all this deportation stuff. off. Roll the tape. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. This weekend, the president made the remarkable statement that he, quote, doesn't know whether he has to uphold the Constitution. You, however, have taken a different position, both in your confirmation hearing and when you took the oath of office. You said that you were committed to complying with the Constitution. Do you still stand by that statement? Absolutely. I believe President Trump as well. It is also violating the fundamental

right of individuals. Do you believe that the Constitution grants everyone in our country the right to due process, including non-citizens? The administration has the authority to... Ma'am, I'm looking for a yes or no question. Yes or no. Do you believe the concept, yes, ma'am? Ridiculous, absurd, dishonest. What else can I tell you? Okay? Number one, she takes the Trump's remark out of context. Number two, she says, this is a quote. I'm going to reread it to you. So she says, do you believe that the Constitution grants everyone in our country the right to due process, including non-citizens? It doesn't grant everyone in our country the right to do process. There are different categories.

So if you are an undocumented alien with a deportation order, you don't have due process. they can sweep you off the street and put you on a plane and boot you out because you already have a deportation order. If you come across today, the Rio Grande River in Texas and set foot on that soil of that state, the border of a drug could turn you right around and boot you right back to Mexico. I don't have to drag you into some courtroom. room? Now, this woman, this Congresswoman, Lauren Underwood, is either too stupid to know that or too dishonest in her presentation. I don't know which it is. There's no other third

possibility. So ridiculous. Anyway, I was going to go over and give you a resume. I'm not even going to bother. All right, Joe Biden, the first sit-down interview since leaving office, Delaware, Hotel DuPont, actually stayed there one time, nice hotel. It was recorded yesterday with the BBC. Strange, he gives an interview to the BBC, the first one. And of course, it lasted for 28 minutes, pretty long on Biden's standards. And here was a highlight or a low light. What did you make of those scenes in the Oval Office, President Trump and President Zelensky? I found it sort of beneath America in the way that took place. And the way we talk about now that, well, it's the Gulf of America.

Maybe we're going to have to take back Panama. Maybe we need to acquire Greenland. Maybe Canada should be. What the hell's going on here? What president ever talked like that? Okay. Number one, President Biden violates protocol, which is in stone that you shouldn't be,

if you're a foreign president, you shouldn't be undermining a current president. But, you know, look, I could do, 30 minutes on Biden's incompetence, okay? But I'm on the record, second worst president ever. Documented it in confronting the presidents. I'm actually writing a new Biden and Trump chapter for the paperback, which will be out, I think, in November, time for Christmas.

We got killing evil and hardback coming out in September. But I'm writing a new chapters on Biden, And because by the time when I was writing the original confining the presidents, the Biden's term wasn't finished yet. Now it is. And now Trump is, you know, I'll get a pretty good handle on Trump by midsummer. So we got two new things. But it's easy for me to, you know, criticize Biden. So why bother, right?

Let's bring in Edward. Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine. host columnist and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One. Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, newsmakers and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or

wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to turn into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast, drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in.

You can find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. Jigerian from the Kennedy School at Harvard up in Cambridge Massachusetts. He is a former U.S. ambassador to Israel appointed by President Clinton. Before that, Ambassador to Syria appointed by Ronald Reagan.

Now, that can't ever happen again. So the professor is in a unique position. A Democrat appoints a very important position, Israel, after a Republican, appointed him to Syria. But you never get that now because the two parties are so far apart. All right, my analysis, Professor, did I make any mistakes here? No, I don't think you're getting any mistakes, Bill. I think you've characterized President Trump's modus operandi on foreign policy. I think pretty well.

He's, as we know, a transactional president. He's not a intellectual strategy president like Richard Nixon. But I like to define his methodology bill as disruptive or constructive uncertainty. What do I mean by that? he throws out a lot of ideas, as we've seen, on domestic policy and foreign policy, and some of them really seem to be totally wild. But then it causes in the interlocutor, be it a country or another leader, you know, it puts the interlocutor he's dealing with immediately on the back foot.

How am I going to respond to this? And it sort of softens him up for the deal. And then he negotiates the deal, as we've seen on the tariffs with China. You know, we've gone down from 145% down to 30% and Chinese are putting in 10% against us. And this is his methodology throughout. And I think that's his methodology. I think his principled approach is America first in all dimensions

and domestic and foreign policy. What's good for America's prosperity, security, et cetera. And then the other thing I'm, I think is very important, and I may be dead wrong on this, but I really think inherently that Trump is adverse, adverse to America's engagement in foreign wars, the Vietnam, the Afghanistan's, the Iraq wars. And he doesn't want, under his watch, to be an American president that is mired in yet another, for example, Middle East war. And this, I think, is really critical because when you look at the team he's put together, it's really hard line.

Well, I won't call him neocons. Let me jump in. Let me jump in because I know something about this personally. You're absolutely right, 100% right. Trump doesn't want any arm conflict. You know, he'll threaten. He'll be bellicose. Yeah, we're going to go invade Panama or going to do this guy.

But he doesn't want to do it. He won't do it unless we're attacked. And the proof here this week is that he went to the Gulf without consulting Netanyahu in Israel at all. And Netanyahu is an armed confrontation guy. He wants to wipe out every Hamas, Hezbollah terrorists that he can find. Trump doesn't want that. And that's one of the reasons he got the hostage out. Now many people know this, but I was directly involved in December last year in the hostage negotiations.

and I can't really explain on television why, but there was a reason that I was involved as a private citizen to, and that was when a lot of the hostage laydown happened. Not before Trump was inaugurated because that both administrations were involved. And as you know, as former ambassador to Israel, there's so many different factions over there

working against each other that Trump is just, it's blank this, I'm going to do what I want because I'm the big dog and they're just going to have to follow in line. That's what's happening over there. I could agree with you. It's exactly what he did, and it's remarkable. There's such a body of public opinion in Israel pressuring Netanyahu to prioritize the remaining hostage releases. I think they're 51 now.

24 alive, they say. And I think that number is solid because Trump has sent a message to the Amos people. You lie to me. Then I'm going to let Netanyahu loose. So I think it's 24 alive. All right. I have to, I'm using this interview as a personal, and this is kind of like the gutter plane. This is personal to me.

I'm going to China. in 10 days and I'm meeting with a lot of Xi's guys. So, I mean, I'm doing this again as a journalist number one, but as a

private citizen number two. So I'll be carrying some messages over to Beijing. I have no experience with the Chinese. Can I be me over there? Can I just know spin it and say, look, this is a deal? Can I do that?

I think you can. I think they've done their homework on you, Bill. Yeah, they invited me. They invited you. They invited you. They've done the truth on you. So that's a green light right there. No, I think you can be very open in your characteristic way with the Chinese. But if you're asking my advice, one thing I would do is, first, I'd listen to what they have to say.

listen and try and and and convey that you know where they're coming from and you want to hear where they're coming from and then you listen to what they say and then you discuss that and and see if there's any common ground no i will it's a Q&A at the at the Beijing club i don't even know there was a Beijing club i'm glad it's inside um for every question they asked me I'm going to ask them a question that that's what it's going to be so I'm going to do exactly exactly what you recommend. Hey, Professor, it's a pleasure to talk with you. I hope you come back.

And if you see anything interesting, just let us know. We appreciate your, you know, realistic view of the world rather than a partisan view. Thank you very much. All right, so the U.S. budget surplus. You don't hear that word budget surplus? We're always in debt. But, again, you know, my job is to report the facts.

And here they are in April. the U.S. government ran a surplus of $258 billion. That compared to a surplus of $210 billion under Biden last year, an increase of 23%. Now, in April, they always run a surplus. Why? Because it's a tax date.

You got to get your tax. So the most money comes in in April. So that's not unusual. But the big, the 23% increase is because of the Trump tariffs. That's the why it increased, $49 billion, because $16 billion of that was taken at the ports of call. So when Trump says we get $5 billion a day, it's a little of exaggeration, but he's getting, tariffs to bring a lot of money into U.S. Treasury. You should know that.

McDonald's. So everybody remember the McDonald's campaign thing where Trump was at the driving window, giving McDonald's food to the people, and it was a big hit and all of that. Now, McDonald's is thrown in with Donald Trump. Did you know that? I didn't know that. So we're going to see Ronald McDonald wearing a MAGA hat next? I don't know.

But there was a joint announcement with the U.S. Labor Secretary, Lori Chavez de Remmer, and the CEO of McDonald's Christopher Kempinski. McDonald's going to hire $375,000. summer workers. Now, why is this important? Because it's gateway. I worked at Carvel when I was 17, fast food ice cream place. And what does is it trains you, all right? And you got to show up on time, you got to do your job, you know, and you know, so McDonald's yeah, yeah, yeah, okay, 375,000. We're going to hire all young people, temporary work. And we're doing this in conjunction to the federal government. Now, McDonald's, I don't think

to get any money for this. They donated more than $135,000 to Trump in 2020 when he lost. Last time around, that dropped $100,000. McDonald's didn't pump a lot of money into Trump. I guess I felt he was going to lose in 24. Yeah, in 24. But anyway, I thought that was an interesting deal. Gavin Newsom wants to run for president because he knows nobody else with the recognition and the hair style that he has, put his picture up there, please, and here's Newsom, he's a kind of slick guy. So in order to run for president, he's got to get away from the far left stuff that he's championed for decades. So now he says he's going to wipe out all the homeless camps in California. Go. Over 16,000 encampments, we've cleaned up at the state

level. That's unprecedented in the state's history. We'll do more. We have to do. We have to do. more we have a model ordinance that the state is using and that's what now I want to see happen in other municipalities across California. Okay, so why did he do this 10 years ago? Why did he let the homeless situation in California get so out of control? Do you realize that about a quarter of all homeless people in America live in California because the weather's good? And in San Francisco and places like that, they pay the homeless people, they give them cash so they can buy heroin or fentanyl or whatever other money, gin, beer, because most of these homeless people are addicts, they're substance addicts. These aren't people that lost their job.

These are people who make a lifestyle out of not being able to support themselves because they spend all their money on substance, on drugs and alcohol. That's what they do. So California is OK, $3.3 billion, which they don't have, for programs, for the home. homeless people. It's a total waste of money because what are those programs going to be? Well, they're going to be rehabilitation. Well, most, according to every survey,

most drug addicts don't want to be rehab. They're like getting high every day. That's what they want to do. And they're going to do it. No matter what you say, unless you force them into rehab, which they do in some countries. Okay.

So, but this whole thing comes back down to Newsom wanting to run for president. Okay? And now he's got to be, oh, I'm not, no, no. Hey, for 10 years, you let these people run wild, destroy cities, L.A., San Francisco, drain the treasury of the state of California. It did nothing, nothing. But now, oh, we're got a 16,000. Oh, my God. Anyway, that's coming. You should know it. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus. This is the news people actually talk about. The juicy details in the world's politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast.

Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. All right, Canada Day at the White House. This stuff, I keep telling you, if it's Tuesday and this, happens that something else is going to happen on Thursday all right so the new prime minister of Canada Mark Carney throws face up there I'll tell you about I'm on a radio so he was raised at Fort Smith which is a outpost in a Northwest Territories of Canada small-town guy 60 years old has the Liberal Party and he graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard okay in 1987 that means he's a smart guy

I agree in economics. He worked for Goldman Sachs all over the world. So this is a money man. Okay? So he comes to Washington because he has to come to Washington. I've been telling you, the United States is not going to buy Canada. We're not going to send troops to Canada.

Canada's not going to be the 51st day. All of that is hyperbole. Okay? And it has been from day one. And, okay, if I'm the only one who knows it, then I'm lonely. So Carney comes. in, flies down from Ottawa, and he says this, go. And, you know, the history of Canada and the U.S. is we're stronger when we work together,

and there's many opportunities to work together, and I look forward to, you know, addressing some of those issues that we have, but also finding those areas of mutual cooperation. All right. So, you know, it's like they're friends now. I said at the very beginning, Canada and Mexico, I'm going to work out their tower problems. They have to. All right, they need us. We don't need them. Here's President Trump.

Go. Well, we'll be talking about different things. You know, we want to protect our automobile business, and so does Mark. But we want to protect. We want to make the automobiles, and we want to, you know, we have a tremendous abundance of energy more than any country. We have just in Alaska alone, Anwar has been reopened now. And war is one of probably the largest.

find anywhere in the world. They say it's larger than Saudi Arabia. I don't know, but it's a lot. But we have tremendous amounts of energy. Other countries don't. We're both lucky in that way. All right. So they're going to work it out. Okay. And all of this, we're going to take over Greenland. We're going to take over Panama. Stay here, okay? Watch and listen to me. Now, you would ask, well, why does President Trump do all this? Why? Because he wants his negotiating opponents on the defensive. He wants to throw in uncertainty.

That's how he does it. If you read the United States of Trump, that has been negotiating posture since he was 22 years old. He never deviates from it. Create chaos on the other side. Say all of this stuff. You don't have to do it. Just say it.

But anyway, it's a good thing that Canada and the United States and Mexico in the United States, we have more problems with Mexico, as I laid out yesterday with the drug cartels. Canada will come around, and they will reach some kind of deal, I predict. I would like it to be quicker, okay, than it is, but there's just national pride, Carney's got to go back and he can't be presenting himself as somebody surrendering to Trump. It's the same thing with Shine Bomb in Mexico. I can't let Trump intimidate me.

And that's the downside to negotiating aggressively, that if you surrender to that, then your people think that you lost. What Trump is good at doing is win-win. Okay, that's how I negotiate. I have to negotiate a lot of stuff. All right. And I run three corporations here. And I always try to get in a situation where everybody wins.

Some people win more than others. Okay. And then that's into Trump's ego zone. But if everybody wins, a deal is much easier to make. And that's what I believe will happen. Now, former Vice President Mike Pence has staked himself as a conservative ideologue. He's not a bomb thrower, like the talk radio guys or anything like that. But he sees himself as a conservative purist.

And as we know, Donald Trump is not a conservative purist. He holds him conservative positions because his MAGA base is largely conservative. But Pence is doctrinaire. So he goes on CNN. This is interesting yesterday. The only reason CNN invites Mike Pence on is the best. Trump. I couldn't care less what Mike Pence has to say.

That's why they invite him on. Go. It would stifle American growth, limit prosperity, drive-up costs for American consumers. And we ought to be driving again toward that principle of free trade with free nations and standing tough, standing firm on authoritarian regimes like China. So you think he's wrong on tariffs?

I do think this version of tariff policy that's broad-based, indiscriminate, applies tariffs to friend and foe alike, is not a win for the American people. Okay, but remember, there was no solution put forth by Vice President Pence or anybody else as to how to get that trillion-dollar trade imbalance down. And to this day, I don't think Mr. Pence has a solution. He doesn't like the tariffs worldwide.

I don't like the tariffs worldwide. Why don't I like them? Because they create instability in the financial marketplaces. So rather than investments and performance, the stock market, the bond market, the dollar and all that is fluctuating around based on what Sri Lanka might do that day. That's instability. All right.

But I understand you've got to get the trade imbalance down if you want Americans to make more money in the marketplace. And I'm not criticizing Mike Pence, but if he's got something that would improve the trade amounts, I'd like to hear it because I have not. All right, the Department of Homeland Security, this is Christy Knoem, says that if you are an undocumented alien, the government will pay for your flight home and give you $1,000 when you get there. Okay, this is the latest. So it's called self-deporting. And this is funny.

So the Homeland Security Department has one person who's done this, allegedly one, out of 15. million. Apparently the person went from Chicago to Honduras, back to Honduras, on a free air ticket from us, tax fare, and they'll get a thousand bucks when they do something. I don't really know what. Now, this is not going to work. Number one, most undocumented, they're not going to do it because they don't trust anybody, much less the U.S. government. Number two, although there are some carrots here that you could come back to the USA legally at a later date and that if you apply for this program, we won't deport you. Okay, Homeland Security won't go after you so you'll get a notice that you're cooperating and you'll be free from that. But I just

don't see it. And nobody knows how much money that it'll cost. So it's $1,000 for every migrant wants to get back and the airline ticket. Now, here's something that's interesting. Department of Homeland Security says it costs $17,000 on average to arrest detain and remove an undocumented immigrant. 17,000, each one. And I think it's way more than that, because remember, when they're living here,

if you live in California, you know the liberal state, you get all kinds of free health and free this and free that and, you know, okay. But just to get them back to their home, country cost 17,000 ahead 60 minutes you know this really hurts me to report this story so Scott Pelly is a good correspondent he broke the record for Emmys he won 51 or something like that he despises Donald Trump he puts himself up as Edward R. Merle versus McCarthy Senator McCarthy that's what Pelley's doing here and it's piece after piece after piece Trump is the devil Trump is the

devil Trump is the devil Trump over that Trump is suicide 60 Minutes, you know the story. All right. So last night, they do a story about Trump threatening law firms denying them federal business because of what Trump sees as corruption of those law firms. The guy that Pelley centers in on is named Mark Elias. He was the top lawyer for Hillary Clinton when she ran against Trump in 2016. Pelly turns Elias into a hero.

Go. Donald Trump hates me because I fight hard and I fight for free and fair elections. I insist on fighting for democracy in court, fighting for voting rights in court, and insist on telling the truth about what the outcome of the 2020 election was. That's a bunch of bad word.

It's a bunch of bull. Okay. Trump does not. despise Elias because he fights for freedom or anything else. He despises Elias because of this. Number one, Elias, when he was running the Hillary Clinton campaign, hired Fusing GPS to do opposition research against Donald Trump. They then hired the British firm that put together the anti-Trump dossier in the Russian collusion fraud, okay? So Mark Alar is directly responsible for that whole Russian collusion fraud, which he thought would derail Trump and lead Hillary Clinton to the

White House. That's why Trump hates it. And subsequently, there was an investigation. It was no Russian collusion. An FBI agent went to prison or was convicted for ginning up for phony, Pfizer warrants. All that came from Elias. Pelley didn't mention it once. Not once. I'm sitting there stunned. Okay. In addition, he's got three lawyers, Elias and two others pounding Trump as a fascist who wants to destroy the Justice Department. Not one lawyer who supports Trump. Not one. In the whole, piece. I tweeted about it. I mean, I'm sitting there going, what is going on in this country when this CBS News puts this on the air? And they know what they're doing. They know who Elias is

and what he did with fusing GPS. They know. And they ignored it 100%. They couldn't find one Trump lawyer to put forth Trump's point of view? 60 minutes. All right. Then Donald Trump unfortunately puts a photo of himself dressed as a pope on X, I believe, right? Okay, there it is. Now, this is dumb. Why would you do that? This happened Friday. So, of course, people are offended. well to take I hope he didn't have anything to do with that I are you offended by that well you know you it wasn't good so Trump didn't do it but he retweeted is that what they say I just don't understand I really don't understand now am I offended by I'm not offended by much but it's so unnecessary

because many Catholics, the majority, voted for Trump. You may think it's funny, and it's fine, but why do it? Why? That kind of stuff. Smart life. So we're always looking out for you. I hope you believe that. I think you do. You wouldn't be here if you don't. So I can't cover foreign news as much as I'd like to, because I got so much on the domestic front, and we have to concentrate on that. But there's a very good website that covers foreign news. It's called a Global Post. I mentioned it before.

And they are going to give Bill O'Reilly subscribers 50% off. They're yearly, and it's not much. And what you do is you go to globalpost.com and you, when you fill out their promotion code, you put bill or are capital letters notice the caps and then you get 50% off okay this is for new subscribers to global post dot com so if you're fine news person um this is good comes every day i read it every day comes very early in the morning go dump bump bump bump bump something i just can't cover so we hope you check it out okay final thought i you know i get so many letters i don't have any

money, I don't have any money, I don't have any money. A lot of them are from senior citizens, and if you don't have any money, you're hosed in this country. That's it. You screw it. There are, however, some safety nets, and here is one of them. Legal aid, it's free. Now, there are about 130 legal aid organizations in all across country. You go there, and they have attorneys. It's free legal assistance provided to people who are poor. If you make less than 20,000 a year individual or 40,000 for a family of four, you can get free legal advice from legal aid. And go in there with it, whatever your problem is, and they will advise you or give you legal counsel or whatever. And this is what you have to do, because you're going to get it. Every single

American, all 335 million of us before we die are going to have a problem somewhere that you're going to need help with. And if you can't pay an attorney, you're going to get it hard. But legal aid, if you are poor and you don't have any money, they are in business to help you. So find out where your nearest legal aid operation is. That's number one. I feel terrible, but this is a capitalist society. You have got to have some assets. Thank you for watching and listening to the No Spin News. We'll see you again tomorrow.