Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - November 1, 2024

Episode Date: November 2, 2024

Highlights from BillOReilly.com’s No Spin News. Watch the No Spin News weeknights - become a BillOReilly.com Premium Member to watch.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

The big question right now is will Americans vote demeanor again? So as we all know, Joe Biden wasn't elected because Joe Biden was so great. It's he wasn't Trump. And the exit polling proved that in 2020. People were voting against Trump. Will that happen again? Some, some will. But because Biden has been such a disaster for the country, and by extension, Kamala Harris, you have that in play, which you didn't have four weeks ago, four years ago, I should say. Okay, because Biden was vice president and under Obama. It didn't have a real high profile, but he was a name. He'd been around perceived as moderate. Of course, Joe Biden has. no beliefs. So when the progressives got hold of power, he did exactly what they told him to do. Anyway, the subject of the talking points memo this evening is what is really at stake next Tuesday.

It's not about Trump versus Harris in a historical context. And this is what Americans don't understand. I think 80% of them don't understand it. You might because you listen to me and watch me, and we have been hammering this. But this election is about ideology, a vision for the country, between the progressive movement and the traditional movement. So Trump is a traditional ist. May not like him, may disagree with some of the things he's done, but that's the category in which he fits. Traditional. Doesn't want vast changes to our society. Harris is a machine California politician, which means she's a Democrat, but most of all it means she's an Uber liberal, a progressive, and has never deviated out of that, ever one time. And all you have to

do is look at 2019 when she was selected the most liberal senator out of 100 by a political analysis group. And signed on to Bernie Sanders is socialized medicine bill, co-sponsored it. Believe me, there is no doubt of where Kamala Harris is on the political spectrum, although she denies it now because you can't run on that. All right, so let's prove my point. If Kamala Harris wins and both houses were to go to the Democrats, this is what would happen to this country. All right. Number one, amnesty for all undocumented aliens who have not committed a felony. All of them. So we'd have 15 million new citizens. Amnesty. Reparations for slavery, that would cost

hundreds of billions of dollars. Money would be given to African Americans who had ancestors in the slave situation. I don't know how that would ever happen logistically. It would be a nightmare to try to trace all that back, but that's what Kamala Harris wants. You don't believe me? Listen to this. Go.

President, you would be willing to lead a conversation of what reparations for black people would look like. Yeah, including things like what we should be doing to take very seriously undiagnosed and untreated trauma. Take that very seriously. Yeah, okay. All right. All right, three, allowing the government to undermine parental authority from coast to coast in abortion and gender matters involving their minor children. So there would be federal laws passed that say, hey, if your kid wants to transition from a male to a female, you can't stop it. If your daughter wants to have an abortion, you wouldn't even know about it.

That girl can get an abortion with no parental notification. That's what Kamala Harris supports. And I'm not even going to get into the taxpayer money that would pay for the gender operations of convicts of migrants? No restraint. Remember, there's no restraint on abortion for Kamala Harris. None. And she'd bring that same mentality over to the gender transition. Okay. Severe restrictions on firearms. What does that mean? It means there be new federal laws making it very, very difficult for an American citizen to carry a firearm. I'm not, the AKs in the heavy rifles are probably banned,

but the real serious thing is that they would stack up, the federal government would stack up laws to make it very difficult for you to carry. I don't think they could seize the guns from your home. They couldn't do that under the Second Amendment.

They get real difficult for you to transport the firearms anywhere. Owners' taxation on the affluent and corporations, fair share you. We all know that. That's a hallmark of Kamala Harris' presentation. And, of course, all that money would be passed down on consumers, raising prices even higher. But more threatening is that in order to fund all of the entitlements Kamala Harris wants to give people, she would have to tax wealth.

So if you had a paper gain of stocks or bonds or gold or heirlooms, anything, the government would assess that and then tax you on it. And if it went down the next year, so you have this gain in 2025, but in 226 to go down, you don't get a refund. They just assess it again. And every year you'd have to pay. That's outright socialism, close to communism. It's a seizure of private assets.

Okay. A government economy that mandates green spending and strategies. So I asked my staff to total up all the green spending by the Biden administration. There is no figure. But according to earthjustice.org, $34 billion has been spent on solar projects and another $11 billion on wind projects. So we're up to $45 billion just on those two things,

government spending. I'm talking about the government would order corporations to do X. We'd have to do it. And it will be under the green, thing, the global warming thing. All right. A reimagining of criminal punishment in the federal system. Prison sentences would be reduced dramatically because that's where the left lives. That's why we have so much social disorder in the major cities now. Imposed equity where the federal

government would provide entitlements to selected groups. The best example of this is the $25,000 giveaway that Harris is touting to first-time homebuyers. Okay. So that's a massive expenditure, and it's unconstitutional because it's a selected group, getting my, I'm not going to get it, but my tax dollars has to go to them. Who do you think pays for all this stuff? We, the working people in America, pay for it. All right. That's equity. So certain groups are going to get money, but others aren't.

That's not equal justice under the law. All right, it's not. And, you know, all of this stuff will be challenged, but this is what they want, the progressives want. Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver

through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage, gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401K, tax and penalty free. With billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau,

you can trust American Hartford Gold as I, do. Please call 866-326-55-7576 or text bill to 998899. Again, that's 866-3-2-26-5576 or text bill to 9988-99. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about the juicy details in the world's politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Strict limits on speech. This is very interesting.

So in Sweden, they have a law that prohibits hate speech. What's hate speech in Sweden? statements that threaten or expressed disrespect for ethnic groups or similar groups regarding race, skin, color, nationality, ethnic origin, faith, sexual orientation. So if you criticize somebody, show them disrespect, you could be criminally prosecuted in Sweden and you can get up to four years in prison with the progressives want. So I would be doing life right now. And I criticize everybody. I don't care about race or creed or religion.

You're doing something that hurts the folks. I'm coming after you. But under what the progressives want, I'd be muzzles or would every other analyst that's not a progressive. And finally, a weaponization of the Justice Department of IRS, under the Biden administration, 87,000 new IRS employees have been approved. That means the money set aside to pay them. What do you think they're going to be doing?

They're going to be auditing people all over the place. People they don't like. They don't like a group. They'll get audited. And the Justice Department, we've seen it time and time again, Trump being the best case, most vivid case, we'll break you. Okay, we'll break you. would be broken if he didn't have the political action committees picking up his lawyer bills. So they can come in on any American and they can charge you and you have to pay all the court,

all the lawyers to break you. That's not hard. It's easy for them to do. The progressives have been doing. So all of those things, and they're on bill o'Reilly.com, I have them if you want to download that. They're just listed there. and you can read them and weep, pass them along. That's what this vote is about, the progressive vision. Now, you can nitpig Donald Trump. I mean, look, he's mad at me now because I cover him fairly. And everything he does isn't great.

Sometimes he does things that aren't great that hurt him and the country. I thought that pet thing in Springfield, Ohio, was absurd. Because this is a very serious issue. Why do you want to obscure it and give your enemies all that ammo against you? When the overarching issue is there shouldn't be 60,000 Haitians dropped into a small town in Ohio. That's insane. We don't need dogs and cats. So you can quibble with Trump, and you should.

every politician's strengths and weaknesses, but his vision is basically what he did the first four years. And he did a pretty darn good job if you read my essay in confronting the presidents. It's a historical essay, not political. Here's what he did. And I expect he would duplicate much of that if he were reelected next week.

I don't. He's not a fascist. I'm not worried about him sending soldiers to people's houses. That's insane. We never happen. Here's a guy that alerted the Pentagon on January 5th. There might be trouble. Get the National Guard ready. What? And now, well, I'm not even going to bother with that. You got it. Progressive, dramatic change. central government so powerful that no individual rights will be respected if they don't want those rights. You'll be overwhelmed. I'll be overwhelmed against traditional. Trump will pretty much keep our society the way it is. And that's the memo. Okay, so you may have noticed if you watch the Madison Square Garden rally that the former mayor of New York City, Rudy Giuliani, was one of the

speakers. Go. Maybe you don't like what Donald Trump says sometimes. Maybe you don't agree with it, but I'll tell you why. You always know what he's thinking. And we need that from a president. All right. So Mr. Giuliani has a new book out, the Biden crime family, which I read last night. Okay. And it's a blueprint for prosecuting the Biden's. He joins. He joins, us now from Palm Beach. Mr. Mayor, how are you doing? Are you doing all right? I'm doing okay under the circumstances, yes. Yeah, I mean, you've got anybody that anybody thinks when they come up and say to me, how you're doing? I'm doing fine. I love to fight and I'm fighting the right cause. Yeah, I've had a pretty rough go of it. That's for sure. But let's get into the

book. So I'm going to run down things that I believe are true. And you tell me. if I'm right or wrong. Let's do it this way. Sure. Any way you want them. I believe that as vice president, Joe Biden used his office to enrich his brother and his son. Am I correct? For 30 years plus, yes. All right, as senator and then vice president. As senator, remember he was 29 when he became a senator.

Okay. So for a very long time, low level as senator, high level as vice president, money. All right. So he used his power to bring money through contracts and things like that to his brother and son. That is called influence peddling. Correct. Influence pedaling is not a federal crime. Well, first of all, it could constitute the crime of gratuity, which is only a two-year misdemeanor.

Yes, it could be a crime. Right, because McConnell, you know the case of the governor, former governor of Virginia, he was charged with this, and he got off, the Supreme Court threw it out, because he said, look, unless you can prove a quid pro quo, Latin for this for that, this isn't, doesn't rise. So you're, there is no, go ahead. We can get beyond that with, we can get beyond that with the email that is devastating and ignored. ignored by the left-wing press.

Tell me what the email. A Christmas of 2018, Hunter sends an email to his daughter. And he says something like you may be taking over for me. They never respected me. But for 30 years, I've paid all the bills of the family, and I've given half, and I've been required to give half of my salary to pop. Now, to a lawyer, that's an admission.

Okay. It's a powerful piece of evidence in a courtroom, more powerful even than a confession. But if I'm the defense lawyer, if I'm the defense lawyer, I say it's hyperbole. He was just spouting off to his daughter. It's no basis in fact. But I just want to clear one thing up. May I say, Bill, may I say, Bill, that every defense lawyer argues that on an admission, and nine times out of ten, the person gets convicted?

because the judge charges a jury that an admission is more powerful than a confession because there's no element of coercion. You'd have to back it up with some other evidence. Well, you can't. The Justice Department couldn't charge Joe Biden with influence peddling because it's not on the books. That's one of the cruxes of your book. So you've got to have something else. Now.

Yes. Well, that email, that email, whether you dispute it, whether you dispute is a, The defense, look, all the evidence against Donald Trump came from Cohen. We disputed it. You didn't throw the case out because of that. State beef. I mean, the fact is, you always have witnesses who give testimony, and it's disputed. I'm telling you, this is about the most powerful testimony I've ever had in a criminal case.

I don't think it's enough for the feds to go after. The other Cohen thing was a state beef, and as you know, they would have used anything to charge Trump. Bragg and Letitia James in New York. There were bank records to support. There are emails from a guy named Edelman

who was transferring money back and forth. Everything that he said there is corroborated. I don't want to get it. Well, I'm interested in Joe Biden now. Not Hunter Biden, not James. Well, that is Joe. The two congressional committees

that investigated Joe Biden for this, both recommended that he be impeached on it. But in their 300-page reports, they did not say that Biden should be criminally charged here because they weren't able to produce cash going to him. Now, when Hunter Biden says, and you chronicle it correctly in your book, I had to pay dad or pop or whoever, half, okay?

Where is that money? Well, first of all, they never bothered to subpoena all of the purchases of the homes, which would show that Hunter purchased the homes. They also didn't subpoena the four or 500 records of little items that Hunter paid for in the house that was sent to him, like storm windows and new items. a new painting of the house. Also, Hunter paid for the tuition of his half system. This is all part of the acting as a bagman and laundering the half to Joe.

You have several transactions where 50 grand go directly to Joe, and it's exactly 50% of what they got. But where is the 50 grand? Where is it? 50 grand's in his bank account. Oh, I haven't seen that. I haven't seen that $50,000. You didn't see the admission of much email either.

No, I saw, listen, I read what was on that laptop that you got. I read all that, but the congressional committees didn't produce any documentation banking records that showed a $50,000 deposit directly to Joe Biden. Well, there sure is. There's a bank record in February of 2016. it's a laundered transaction What is that? It's a laundered transaction

that went through Ukraine, Latvia, Cyprus, and then into the Biden account and 800,000 comes out for Joe Biden. 800,000? 800,000 of the 3.4 million that they got. So you're saying that Biden, that $800,000

went into Joe Biden, bank account? Yeah, it says 800,000 for the VP on the laundered transaction. The House subpoenaed banking records, they don't have that. I don't know why they don't have that. They also didn't subpoena the woman in Ukraine who is willing to give up the laundered money. All right. I got all that. The offshore bank accounts. The FBI has left her stranded for four years and so are the committee. She has the numbers of the offshore bank accounts because they didn't just get $8 million.

They've got money stashed away in offshore bank accounts. I don't know why Jordan and Comer, who hate Biden, if they had evidence that $800,000 went into Joe Biden's bank account, I think they would have put that out. Now, let's just advance the story. They have a note. I haven't seen it. I'm a journalist.

They haven't produced it. It's not in the report. The 300 page, it's not there. A lot of things aren't in the report. Okay, but that's the biggest thing. That's enormous. The woman, the woman came forward in January of 2020. All right.

She said, I am the widow of the former owner who she believes was killed by Burisma, the person who by Floshevsky, the person who paid them off. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast. reminding you to turn into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all size, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. Power, politics and the people behind the headlines.

I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce 1. Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, newsmakers, and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. Well, people can read your book and you've got all of that in the book. Let me finish.

People will never hear this, and it'll be covered up the way it has been covered up. The people that did this, she was willing to produce. We handed it over to the FBI, and we handed it over to the Pittsburgh. U.S. Attorney, Barr buried it, never did it. The woman went and hid for four years, and she's still offering to do it, and nobody has followed up on it. Okay, that brings us to present day. All right, that brings us to present day. Trump has indicated he's going to stop all this Biden stuff, that if he's elected next Tuesday, and he, of course, he's going to appoint Attorney General, that he's not going to go after Joe Biden. He hasn't said it. He's going to start a

straight out, but he's indicated he's going to leave Hunter Biden alone, blah, blah, blah, blah. Do you think that Trump will resurrect this case and then put an attorney general in charge of getting to the bottom of it? May I say there's one thing I very much disagree with him on? He should have prosecuted Hillary Clinton, and we may have created a deterrent effect. He should prosecute this because, God forbid. But do you think he will? Repeated by Democrats when they come back.

We have the criminal law not only to punish. the wrongdoer, but to deter the wrongdoer. And one thing we've done with the Democrats, please let me finish, Phil. One thing we have with the Democrats is, we encourage their criminal conduct. Do you know how many crimes they've committed? Comey, perjury, straight out and out perjury. All right. Obama, I don't think he's going to.

Money laundering, money laundering to the Ayatollah. They keep getting away with it. I can give you 20 crimes that would have been prosecuted. We don't do it. We get scared. And then they prosecute us for crimes they make up. So we'll go through four years of being nice to them. And as soon as they get back in power, they'll try to put me and Trump in jail for the rest of our lives. There's something we didn't do wrong. You got to fight back. I don't want to do an unfair prosecution. I want to do one based on justice. I can convict these people.

And that's what your book is. That's what your book is about. That's what your book is about. It's called the Biden, Biden crime family, the blueprint for their prosecution. But I don't believe Trump is going to take it any further if he's elected. I agree with you, but I think it's wrong. I don't think you will. The top people, not the little people, the top people should be indicted. Well, if Biden got 800,000, he should be in jail. And we appreciate your time very much.

Good luck. More like 40 million. Okay. Latest polling, Trafalga has got Georgia, 48 Trump, 46 Harris, but a big spread, 10-point spread, on female 55 and male 45. Maybe that was the outcome last time, but that's a big spread. And of course, female, more females helps Kamala Harris in the polls. And that's why we give this to you.

Arizona, Trump 48, Harris 46, same thing. So Trump, according to Trafalgar, is up by two in Georgia. Arizona. Those are the latest polls that we have. I wanted to talk with the guy who runs American Pulse Research tonight, and I'm going to, but first I want to explain what that is. So it's a survey company. They do research. Obviously, if you're going to be named American Post Research, you do research. Hello? Anyway, they use sophisticated techniques to ensure accuracy, reliability, and objectivity and results. And that's what we like. Joining us now from Alexandria of Virginia in the shadow of the nation's capital, Dustin Olson,

who is a poster for the group, and he hosts a podcast, Political Trade Secrets. Wow. You know, everybody thinks I do a podcast. This is not a podcast. That's a broadcast. Yeah, a discipline broadcast, but everywhere I go, oh, we watch your podcast. It's not a podcast. Not that there's anything wrong with podcasts, but podcasts are ruminating. You ruminate. Here we go, boom, this is what's going on. So you say, Mr. Olson, that you are seeing the best poll numbers ever for Trump.

Is that accurate? Yeah, it's accurate. If you look at 2020 and you look at 2016 at this point today in those races, Biden nationally was up by 7.4%. and Clinton was up by about 4.6%. So that's a pretty big difference. Actually, when I checked right before we came on and the real clear politics average nationally actually has Trump up a huge 0.4% nationally. But for him, that actually is a pretty big deal because he's never had this point in the election. And in the swing states, this is the thing that I find really interesting, though.

He's up by 0.9%. But each of the states are very close. and that's been different than previous elections. Sometimes one of the swing states will have a bigger margin, and then another state will have another bigger margin for the other person. They're all within a point or two, and that is unusual. So that's kind of where I see the race right now. You mentioned there's some people who think that it's possible

that he could get the popular vote. It is possible. Really, the question is, have pollsters been able to figure out what their mistakes were in 2016 and 2020 and correct for those? I think we are really having accurate results. In 22, we had everything 91% accurate as far as the outcome and 98% within the margin of error. But I'm not sure if that's the case for all bolsters. No, it's not.

And that's why we have you on because you were very accurate two years ago. The gender stuff, they sneak this in. And some of it's based upon what the voter turnout was in a previous election. But other times, it's the thumb on the scale. The pollsters know that most American women, by a small margin, will vote for Harris. And by a much larger margin, men will vote for Trump. So if you poll more women, the outcome is likely to be more favorable to Harris, correct? That's correct.

Though the population is generally more female than male, and then the voting populations, even a little bit slightly more than that. So it's anywhere from 52 to 53% is usually what you want your sample to be. For female, it depends on the state. And I can't speak to every specific state, but we always go in, we look at the census data, and we look at the previous elections of what the makeup was of the population. And that's really important for a pollster to do. People also look at the partisan breakdown, but that's been a problem in the last 10 years

because the partisan breakdown, we've had a huge realignment within parties, where a lot of pollsters have really, I think, honed in, especially for states like Wisconsin and Michigan, is looking at who someone voted for in 2020. So we asked that question, who did you vote for? And then we look at that when we get the sample and see if it's in alignment with what the actual results were. And that has helped us to deal with the...

And that's a smart play. Now, the Republican registration has been reported to be up. Are you seeing that? Is that true? That is absolutely true. In Pennsylvania in particular, there's some Democrat counties that have now become Republican counties. There's been a mass operation to register voters in that state. Then also the early returns tend to be a little bit more Republican. Now, that is a state that has party registration, so we do have a better idea of which party people are registered in.

Though, as you know, a lot of people registered maybe in the 1970s. they were a Democrat then. But my theory is that the Republican registration has gone up because the economy is still hurting many American workers in the higher price range. That's my theory. Yeah, plus the party identification. That's actually what we use in polling

as opposed to registration because it's kind of a state of mind. And we have seen over this election that people who identify as Republican are just at some. growing and Gallup did a study over the summer where they found that this is actually the highest that they've seen that people identify as Republican or leaning Republican. They had it about 48% to about 45% I think for Democrat, which they also indicate is one of the primary factors to kind of guess who's going to win the election. Okay, final question for you. Right now,

as it stands, if American polls... had to make a call, a prediction, you would say? That's a great question. And if people go to polling club.com, we are releasing our final survey on Thursday morning. We're in the field currently with our survey. I haven't looked at the results. All right, good, because I'm...

Here's what I'm going to do for you guys. All right. So you're going to do Thursday morning. I'm going to do Thursday evening on my prediction, but I'm going to set up my prediction with your prediction. Excellent. So I better be accurate.

Well, yes. Who knows? But I do think that the trend is in Trump's favor. But stuff like you mentioned in the last few days, you know, anything can happen in the last. I mean, the Trump campaign is largely undisciplined. But in the last seven days, I'm telling you it's got to be very methodical.

It has to be. Because a few more of these mistakes, and it didn't have to happen. It was such a crazy mistake to put a comedian unvetted and they knew he was a bomb thrower. That's how he's made his reputation. And nobody's watching what he's going to say?

Unbelievable. All right, Justin, thank you very much. We appreciate it. And let's go to the media madness. Reports on our Washington Post has lost 200,000 subscribers for failing to endorse Kamala Harris. I do not believe this report. Okay.

What I do believe is that the guy who owns it Jeff Bezos, the big billionaire, he doesn't like the paper. He thinks the paper is 100% liberal, which it is. They got George Will, but, you know, come on, George Will on the right side. But they just push liberal agendas all day long at The Washington Post, and they're losing, I think it's more than $10 million a year now. And that's what Bezos is worried about. So he said, no endorsement, and that is leading there. USA Today says he's not going to endorse either. That's Ginnett, Arizona Republic, Des Moines Register, Detroit Press, Tennessean, El Paso Times.

Nobody's going to endorse. Again, USA Today, going out of business. I mean, it's a disaster. So these companies that said, look, we valiated every single Republican and conservative in a country. Then we buy our product. We've got to stop that. It's too late, it's too late, not coming back. News Nation last night, so there was this town hall two hours,

and they're going to rerun it Saturday night at 10, all right, and it's worth watching. So, Big Cass, and is Cuomo, Stephen A. Smith, myself, Sarah Palin, Mark Cuban, Robert Kennedy, Jr., a whole bunch of other politicians, Polster, Ozoi. Now, when I went into it, not anyone. to do it, okay? Because, you know, right now I'm so busy with Bill O'Reilly.com in my operation. For me to go into that dopey city, which I had to do, and be one of the moderators of it, it's a lot of work. But, you know, News Nation been very good to me. They said, look, we need you in there as a traffic cop, all right? And they did. Although there wasn't any acrimony,

there really wasn't any rudeness or personal attacks. We made that quite clear up front because there were about 100 people in the town hall. That wasn't going to be tolerated. Okay, let me play a couple of sound bites. So a Democratic congressman, Jared Moskowitz, from Florida, was there. And the Democrats pound the abortion issue, as you know, because they need women.

They need 55% of women. women to turn out. Last time it was 52%. They get 55 Harris, because Harris will take the majority of women. All right. So Moskowitz, you know, he's abortion, abortion, abortion, we'll take. I don't support late-term abortions. But if you look at President Trump's position, which it's unclear, he said he supported the amendment in Florida, the constitutional amendment, and then he said he was against it. He's come out and said that he supports 15 weeks, but he supports that with exceptions right that's not some moral compass he's looking at the polls he's looking at the polling well wait that's an interesting point you're making congressman what was your reaction when

uh the nominee for the democratic party said trump wants to ban abortion you know that's not true well hold on wait you know it's not true i know i know when trump says something i know it's not True. No, no what aboutism here. No what about it. Hold on. You knew and know that what she said was false. The only reason, does that bother you? Hold on. The only reason you can say that is because we have a filibuster in the Senate if it, hold on, if it's true. She made the statement in front of the world. Hold on yet. It's not true. Do you support that? The bill. When you, when you say, when you say it's not true in this world, it's not true today. It might be true tomorrow.

That's pretty convoluted. No, no, hold on. All right. So there you go. I get a little sample of it, okay? Now, you don't see that kind of stuff anymore on cable TV. You don't see it anymore. That's how I made my reputation on the O'Reilly Factor.

But they don't do it anymore because it's hard to do. And nobody wants to get in trouble. Okay? So it's all speaking to the choir. So, and I like Moskowitz. I mean, he stands up for Israel. He's a party apparatchnik, okay, but he wouldn't answer the question when the vice president absolutely lied.

There's no doubt, and it's not like, well, maybe it won't be true in the future. No, she lied. Okay, number two, Stephen A. Smith, who's another good guy. All right, so Stephen A is a sports guy. He may know him. Once he get into a little more serious broadcasting, and that's special. smart of him to do it. So Stephen A is putting himself up, and I think he's very sincere, that he is big on women's rights. Go. I just want to make one quick point, and this goes to

you. Sure. There have been, Democrats have been very effective saying to women, American women, that the government has no right to interfere with your body. That's the mantra, right? Okay. Isn't there another body involved here? Amen. That's exactly. That's the point. Especially in late term. Isn't there another body? Yes. Okay. So now we never, and I mean never hear one word, adoption.

We never hear what Bill Clinton said, abortion safe and rare. What we hear from the Democratic candidate for president is abortion any time for any reason. Do you know there are only three non-communist countries in the world? that has that law and there is a reason for that okay after the town hall somebody came up to me and says you know they would never say that what you said about there's another body involved which of course is the unborn child on the network you would be banned from saying that you couldn't say it on ABC NBC or CBS you couldn't say it that's how extreme this whole thing has gotten so fast. All right, final SOT on News Nation Town Hall last night. And again, I'll remind you,

Saturday night, 10 p.m. Eastern, they're going to rerun it. So I injected some humor into this because I wanted people to feel relaxed. Go. I believe that polls are really good for strippers and cross-country skaters. But not for a whole lot of other things because the women you would there will be no demonstration you're the only person who can say that and get away with it but no I just I personally don't think that gender is such a big darn deal in this race but it is a big darn deal All right, men will overwhelmingly go for Donald Trump, maybe five or six points.

And women, they'll go for Harris. I don't think the plurality will be that big. If 55% of American women vote for Harris, she'll win. Final thought of the day, here is probably the dopiest statement made in this campaign. Go. He wants to ban Muslims. He wants to deport Muslims. and he wants to start interment camps.

And that's what we are busy talking to every voter. Congresswoman Debbie Dingell trying to scare Muslims into voting for Harris. He wants to start intermin camps. Oh, you know, there's dumb and there's hopeless. Ms. Dingell might be in the hopeless category. That is it for us tonight. We'll have our election show on Monday. Don't miss it.

It's going to be a really good presentation. Thank you very much for watching and listening. I'll have a column on Sunday, and we'll see you on Monday.