Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - November 15, 2024

Episode Date: November 16, 2024

Highlights from BillOReilly.com’s No Spin News. Watch the No Spin News weeknights - become a BillOReilly.com Premium Member to watch.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Motion is still running very high about the vote. And that is the subject, I should say, of this evening's talking points memo. Okay, so liberal Democrats are furious, of course. But where I live on Long Island, we're not getting a lot of venting. Got a lot of looks, some dirty looks, but not a lot of shoutouts or anything like that. And the conservative core is deliriously happy. Okay, where I go, everybody wants to know what's going to happen now, and this, that, and the other thing. And you know what the most common question is asked to me, are you as happy as I am?

And my answer is no, I could never be as happy as you are in any circumstance. But my job is to watch all the people in power. And that's my job. A lot of people, they don't understand that. They think that this is more of a cable news presentation where there's rooting going on. There's no rooting here. I mean, I made it clear that I was going to vote for Donald Trump, and I told you why. Was it based on ideology?

It was based on what I believe is best for the country. And thank God that most of my country. that most of my compatriots think the way I do. So Trump won and Kamala Harris lost. But there is bitterness on the left, okay? Because they weren't anticipating this. Not with the press touting Kamala Harris as hard as it did. So the left is turning on each other, which is very interesting to watch.

First sound by Nancy Pelosi, blaming Biden. Go. The anticipation was that if the president were to step aside, that there would be an open primary. And as I say, Kamala may have, I think she would have done well in that and been stronger going forward. But we don't know that. That didn't happen. We live with what happened. And because the president endorsed Kamala Harris immediately, that really made it almost impossible to have a primary at that time.

Well, I don't believe a word of it. You know, Nancy Blossey is not a truth teller. I can document that a thousand times. The Democratic establishment is split into the party apparatchniks, Nancy Pelosi, whatever the party wants to do, she'll do. And the far-left zealots who run the Biden White House, who desperately wanted Kamala Harris because she's as further left than Biden. Okay, so there is a split.

But nobody in the Democratic Party wanted primary, a messy primary, because that would have brought disparagement to Biden and Harris, because they did such a terrible job. Why would you want a primary with a guy, an independent Democrat or a conservative Democrat, whatever, blasting the current White House? No. So Pelosi's not telling the truth, which is her motorist operation. then that's who she is now we go into the media precincts uh msnbc an arm of nbc news an arm of comcast it's ridiculous absurd anybody watching that is a loon i'm sorry now if you watch it

just to get a perspective on what the loons believe okay but if you're believing this stuff you're alone roll the tape black voters came through for Kamala Harris, white women voters did not. That is what it appears happened in that state, is that if you can't flip enough white women, and we've talked about this on this set numerous times. Go about race for her. Everything's about race.

Everything. If you go to the Met game, about race. A lot of white guys struck it. I mean, how boring is this. Third one. This was a situation where the head of the Democratic Finance Committee went on Fox and blamed the Obama's. Michelle and Barack Obama waited three days to endorse Kamala Harris. It was a silence heard around the world.

And prior to Biden's endorsement that no one really anticipated, they were vetting people like Mark All right. So now it's Pelosi is blaming Biden. Joy Reid is blaming white women. And the finance director is blaming Michelle and Barack. This is really, I mean, come on. Now, I don't blame anybody because I know what happened. Most Americans are suffering because of Biden's incompetence. That's it. That's it. That's why Trump won't an old landslide. Now, there is an ideological component, and I'll get to that. There is.

The woke stuff and the DEI stuff. Most Americans don't want that. But by far, in a way, it was they're paying more than 20% more for essentials of life than they did under Trump. That's what did it. Okay. When you look at the stats, and we'll give them to you in a moment, moment. I hope you have a pen and paper handy because you're amazing historical stats that I am about to give you. When you look at them, it is clear there were two main reasons the Democrats

fell apart. One was President Biden, the second worst president in our history. That's a pretty tough bar. He made it. And if you read confronting the presidents, and I hope that. you have, all right, or will, I lay it out there. I can't lay it out any clearer. Okay. And Kamala Harris was a terrible candidate. Why was she a terrible candidate? For one simple reason. If you are speaking to a person, okay, no matter where you are, you're having a conversation, you ask them a question, and the person just doesn't answer it. Okay, maybe it's a personal question, you understand, but if it's just a generic question, why are they not answer it? You know, when I hire people from my three corporations, I have to ask them

questions. If they don't answer the questions, I don't hire them. If you have a babysitter or somebody who does your lawn, cut your lawn, or a plumber or a painter, and you ask them a question about the job, and they won't answer it, do you hire them? that's it she wouldn't answer any questions and America's even the dumbest of us

are going is something wrong I mean I have followed politics now for 50 years I've never seen this before the arrogance of it and the disrespect for you

the American voter because you're you're voting to hire her for four years to run the country and she won't answer any questions. That's disrespectful to you. Now some people don't care, they don't care about anything, but most people do. And that took a while for that to get around. And then when she went on to view and said she wouldn't change anything, that was the final nail. Okay? So that's why they lost, but there is another component. She is, and I said this for you, the furthest left presidential candidate in history,

she got elected, this country would have been turned over, it would have been horrible. And I have a message of the day where I just lay it out. I'm just going to tell you one. I want you to read the message of the day. Post it every morning. You don't want to be a member. Just go to bill o'Reilly.com and there it is. Okay. Kamala Harris, when it comes down to it, She wants a central planning apparatus at a Washington or Sacramento in California, wherever to tell us what to do in every phase of our lives. Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets.

And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver. through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage, gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401K, tax and penalty free. With billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau, You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do.

Please call 866-326-55-7576 or text bill to 99-88-98-99. Again, that's 866-3-26-5-7576 or text bill to 998899. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to tune into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever

you get your podcast. Economically, medically, everything. The big guys. government will tell. They'll dictate what we do. All right. You give us all your money through taxation. We'll set you up, cradle the grave. Nobody will really do well, but nobody's going to be desk. That's what we want. Central planning. That's what she wants. That's what she believes in. Not self-reliance, robust capitalism, marketplace competition. None of that. and that's why she lost and that's a memo all right here are the stats ready for the stats as we have them now might change a little but not much so popular vote all right so trump got almost 75 million you see it on the screen there 74 8 and that's about what he got last time harris got 71 million

that's down 10 million from joe in 2020 Why? Because people who hate Donald Trump, they're suffering too in the marketplace. And they just didn't go to vote for her because she's part of the apparatus of why they're suffering. Electoral College 312 to 226, which is a landslide. And if you look at the counties, I think it was what? 85% of American counties voted for Trump. It's just ridiculous. It's just a real liberal stronghold.

that supported her. None of the regular folks. All right, let's go to the exit polling, age 18 to 29, the Youngens. All right, Harris got 54, Trump 43. 30 to 44, now we're getting a little mature here. We've got families going on, and it was essentially a tie. Harris 49 and Trump 48. Then we get to the middle age, 45 to 64, thinking about your future retirement, future retirement Trump wins big 54 44 and then 65 or all to surprise me tie 49 each okay

um I guess some of the old people senior citizens bought that Trump was going to destroy Social Security and Medicare I guess they bought I don't know what that vote is I really don't know what that that is um but it's there okay how about marital status single Married. Married people first, 56% Trump, 43 Harris. Not married, 54 Harris, 42 Trump. Okay, very close, just flipped it. And unmarried people, there's a lot of women in there with the abortion and all that. Race, this is the most interesting one to me. So white Americans, which make up 71% of the voting public, 57 Trump, 41 Harris, black, 85 Harris, 13 Trump. That's what Trump thought he was going to do better there.

Latino, this was the key. 12% of the electorate, blacks are 11%. So Latinos outnumber them now. 52% Harris, 46% Trump. I said if Trump got over 40, he would win. And once again, I am an Oracle. Asian 54 for Harris, 39 for Trump. No idea about that vote.

I don't know why that is. Religion. Protestants make up 42% of the electorate. They broke for Trump big, 63 to 36. Catholic. Last time around, it was 50-50. This time Trump got 58, Harris 40, because Kamala Harris celebrated abortion. Celebrated. It made it into a noble thing. That's why that happened. Jewish, 78% Harris 22. Trump, which shows you that Jewish Americans prioritize their liberal belief system over Israel. That's their priority. Okay. Gender. Okay.

42% male voted for Harris. 55 of 13 voted for Trump. Female. Okay. 53% of the electorate male is 47, by the way. interesting. Fifty-three percent of female voters went for Harris, 45 for Trump. So an eight-point advantage for Harris there, but it didn't, couldn't overwhelm the other demographics. Isn't interesting? You know, you think, I thought women would be more for Trump because of the

grocery store factor. But ideology, you know, if you are a voter who is gripped, by ideology. The ideology is more important to you than actual what's happening in real life. And there are millions of voters like that. You know, the black vote is very interesting because it's cultural in America. Blacks are expected to vote Democrat.

And if you don't, you get heat, generally speaking. You get heat, societal heat. And that's why it's the way it is. Because black Americans are suffering. No doubt about it. New York City, hush money, stormy Daniels, all that nonsense. Never should have happened. Its sentencing is now delayed again.

Okay? Delayed, delay, delay. It's set for November 26th. Two days before Thanksgiving, I don't think it'll ever happen. I think this one's gone. I think Atlanta's gone. You just, it can't. All right, president is elected.

They're going to bog them down with this nonsense. My opinion could be wrong. All right, here are the new cabinet selections that we know so far. Susie Wiles, White House Chief of Steff, Marco Rubio, Secretary of State. I think that's a good choice. Senator Rubio, very smart guy and smooth.

A UN ambassador, Elise Stefanik, very loyal to Donald Trump. Borders are a Tom Holman bomb thrower, but we need a shake-up down there, no doubt about it. Defense Secretary Pete Hague Seth, very controversial. Heg-Seth, very controversial, but Hegg-Seth job is not making policy, it's oversight of the Pentagon. And he's very loyal to Trump. National Security Advisor, Congressman Michael Walsh, White House Counsel William McGinley, I don't know him.

Department of Homeland Security, Christy Knoem, Governor of South Dakota, did a very good job in that state. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, he's a pro. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, U.S. Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee. I like that selection. Huckabby, very passionate about Israel in the Middle East. This is a riot. Department of Government Efficiency, Elon Musk, and Vevac Rameswamy. All right, shake it up, boy.

We need a shakeup. And finally, I'm only going to come back to me. One more name is Stephen Miller, Deputy Chief of Staff of Policy. He is now the most powerful man in Washington, D.C., beside Donald Trump. Stephen Miller, when you see the words, chief of staff, he's deputy, but he's really chief, for policy. He's the enforcer. If anybody in the cabinet gets out of line, Miller, very tough guy,

he got him on, I know him well, very tough. He's watching everything. and we'll report back to Trump if anybody's not doing what they should do. Miller, unbelievably powerful. He's Donald Trump's former speechwriter, by the way. So let's get some analysis from a smart guy. Joining us from Newport News, Virginia, Dr. Jonathan White.

He's a professor of American Studies at Christopher Newport University in that town. Are you upset by any of these cabinet? appointee so far well i think the biggest surprise for me was pete heggseth i didn't see that one coming i don't think most people saw that one coming and the headline is of course going to be fox news person host but i didn't know his background in terms of the book he'd written or his time in the military so he has a lot of experience and he's going to have to really put that at the forefront of his case for being confirmed by the senate i think he'll uh get confirmed because

I can't see any Republican Senator, 53 of them now, voting against him. Because then you'd be spitting in the eye of the president of the United States. You're not going to do that. So he'll get confirmed, don't you think? I think that's probably right. Yeah, I mean, well, why would you dissent? Exeth is a guy who is very passionate about the military, everybody knows that. His book was a huge bestseller.

But he's not Donald's Rumsfeld. He's not going to be running the Defense Department. That's going to be with the National Security. people. It's a whole different structure. What Trump wants is he wants information flow back because he doesn't trust the generals because the generals burned them first time around, Millie and these guys. And now he wants to know what they are doing. And he's got a right to know. He's a commander of chief. That's what Hegg said. That's his job to figure out what these guys are doing. Yeah. And his book shows, from what I've not read it, but from what I've heard of it,

it shows that he's in line with Trump's view of what the military should be, eliminating the woke things that have come in in the last four years. No doubt about it. You want someone on board who's going to carry out your agenda. But that leads you in my next question. So in modern times, most presidents appoint people who are sympathetic with them. Do you know of any exceptions? Yeah, you know, I think that's a really interesting question.

And as I've been looking at these picks, and as you were talking about, about them, you went through the list and you said, you know, he's loyal to her, she's loyal, or sorry, he's loyal to him. She's loyal to him. That's something he didn't have in his first administration. And I think the lesson he really took out of that administration was, you know, I came in from the outside. I had to rely on people to tell me who to appoint. Now I'm going to appoint people who I know are going to be loyal to me as a leader and to my agenda. And as I've been thinking about historical precedents, I actually go back to the very beginning, the first transition, which would be going from George Washington to John Adams, there was no precedent at that

point. There had never been a presidential transition. And so Adams didn't know what to do in that role. And he wound up thinking, well, George Washington's cabinet are in office. They've been confirmed by the Senate. They hold these positions. I'll leave them in. And he left Washington's cabinet pretty much intact for much of his term in office. And the problem that Adams ran into was that these guys were not loyal to him. They were loyal to Washington, and even more so, they were loyal to Alexander Hamilton. And so the problem that Adams runs into is that as he begins to have policy disagreements with his cabinet and with Alexander Hamilton, the cabinet officials, people like the Secretary of State, the Secretary of War, the Secretary of the Treasury,

they're leaking the confidential cabinet meetings to Hamilton. And just before the presidential election of 1800, Hamilton goes public with things that should have been confidential. And that has a very bad effect on Adams as he's running for re-election. You know, I write about this in confronting the presidents, and it was another element to it, Alexander Hamilton, in case people haven't read the book or they don't know their history. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, the juicy details in the world's politics, business, pop culture,

and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One. Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, newsmakers and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world.

Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast, you don't want to miss an episode. Was Washington's closest advisor. He was a federalist. He believed in a big, strong government. But back then, the vice president wasn't on the same ticket as John Adams. It was a guy who got the second amount of votes. And that was Thomas Jefferson.

And Jefferson didn't like Adams at all. And he was getting Adams from one side, and Alexander Hamilton was getting Adams from the other side and Adams going like didn't know what hit him and then got blown out, lost to Jefferson the next time around. But in modern times, you know, I was on News Nation last night and I said, this is not unusual what Trump is doing. Franklin Roosevelt did exactly the same thing and he was in four times

and Nixon, Richard Nixon, paranoid as hell. He had Ehrlichman and Haldeman watching every move, everybody made. But there's one difference in Donald Trump now, as he takes office in January, than from four eight years ago. It's now Trump thinks he's got it figured out. He doesn't need a lot of advice from other people. He may seek it, but he doesn't think he needs a lot of advice. Would you disagree with that?

No, I think that's right. And I think Trump sees himself as having an opportunity to be a transformational president. So if he puts people in place who are going to carry out his agenda and who are going to be loyal to him, he's going to be able to do really big things that some people are going to love and some people are going to hate or be terrified of. And so, you know, thinking about Vivek Ramoswamy and Elon Musk is getting into this role of government efficiency. Like that would be a transformational move or putting in HegSeth to. revamp what's going on at the Pentagon, that would be transformational, or to get rid of the Department of Education, as I think he has pledged to do, that would be transformational. And so, yeah, I think the first time in office, he didn't know what to expect. And you saw this in the Joe Rogan interview, where Rogan kind of asks him, what did you expect? And what was it like? And Trump didn't give him the answer that I think Rogan was looking for. Now Trump's going in, knowing exactly what he wants to accomplish. And I think much more confident and much, you know, And he learned the hard way.

He appointed people who burned him. And now he wants to avoid that. All right, doctor, thanks very much for helping us out. Really appreciate it. This is a very interesting story here. Kamala Harris had, what, more than a billion dollars to campaign, right? More than Trump. I think it was almost two billion.

I don't know. He's got unlimited money. Let's just put it that way. So the Washington Examiner on Friday, November 8th, breaks story about how Oprah Winfrey's production companies paid a million dollars by Kamala Harris's campaign. One million dollars, big money. And you remember Oprah did a bunch of displays, let's call him, for Ms. Harris. Anyway, we confirmed that number was true, but Oprah denied it. Oprah said on Monday, November 11th, okay, two days ago, not true.

I was paid nothing ever, but that's not what the report said. So you, a production company was paid, not you. Okay, and that's the way it always goes. So I got three corporations, and a lot of the money that goes into the corporations, eventually, someday will come to me, but I don't get paid directly. It just comes in. So Oprah was doing a little two-step here, and she finally had to admit it, all right? And here's what she said, quote, I did not take any personal fee.

However, the people who worked on that production needed to be paid, and they were end of story. It would have been the end of story, Oprah, if you had told the truth up front. Right? But here's the bigger story. The Kamala Harris campaign paid a half million dollars to Al Sharpton's non-profit. Half million. Okay, $250,000 on September 5th and another $250,000 on October 1st. Okay, why?

Why would Kamala Harris be paying Al Sharpton $500,000? This came from the Washington Free Beacon, okay? But it is on the Federal Election Commission's website, so there's no doubt it happened. Okay, on October 20th, just 19 days after getting a half million bucks, Sharpton interviews Harris, on MSNBC. It doesn't say to the audience, hey, Harris's campaign paid my outfit $500,000. Doesn't mention it. This is NBC News. That is a firing offense or used to be at any news agency in this country.

It's unbelievable how corrupt that is. Even if there wasn't any deal, you say I'm interviewing so-and-so and that person's campaign gave me a half-million dollars or my nonprofit. No. NBC going to do anything about this? No. I don't believe so. We're going to ask them.

Okay? Can you fire Sharpton? What are you going to do? Fire the news chief? fire the head of Comcast, John Roberts, who runs this corrupt organization. This is the height of corruption. Oprah was nothing. Oprah just didn't want to admit that the Harris campaign gave Harpo, her production company, a million.

Okay? But this, under the NBC News banner, boy. All right, this is the most important story of the night, reviving Kate's law. So you may have heard me talk about this in the past. On July 1st, 2015, 32-year-old Kate Steinley was walking with a father in the Embarcadero of San Francisco. A gunshot went off, Kate was killed. The man who owned the gun or stole a gun, Jose Inez-Garcia Zarate of Mexico.

had seven felony convictions in the United States. He had been deported five times and come back every time. Okay? So I propose Kate's law that if you're convicted of a felony and you're deported and you come back, you get a harsh prison term automatically just when you come back. You don't have to commit another crime. Here's what I said on July 21st, 2015. Hi, I'm Bill O'Reilly.

Thanks for watching us tonight. Anarchy and immigration law. That is the subject of this evening's Talking Points memo. At least 110 American cities and counties are currently refusing to obey the federal government when it comes to enforcing immigration law. 110. That, of course, leads to chaos and chaos leads to violence. This month, 32-year-old Kate Steinley murdered in San Francisco.

Francisco by a criminal alien who had been deported five times. As you may know, we have called for new legislation called Kate's Law, which would mandate any convicted, aggravated felon who comes back to the USA after being deported, would receive at least five years in a federal penitentiary, no wiggle room. Now, Senator Ted Cruz and others got behind Kate's law. Mitch McConnell would not put it up for a standalone vote. Why? Because he's not going to let that punk o'Reilly tell them what to do. One of the worst things I've ever seen a national politician do. I lost all respect for Mitch McConnell. Now, John Thune is the Senate majority leader, and I believe that this can be revived. And I talked about it with Sean Hannity on his radio

program yesterday, and I said, O'Reilly and Hannity have to get this done. Go. would say if you are convicted of a crime and you're undocumented in America and we deport you, you come back, you get a 10-year mandatory prison term. Stand-alone bill, it would pass, Trump would sign it, we could get this done in 30 days after he's inaugurated. Does that make sense to you? Of course it does. I supported it back then. I will support it again, and I agree it should be reintrodued and you have my full backing and there's

no selling point here, Bill, we're on the same page. All right, so Hannan and I are going to try to get some business done on this. Donald Trump told me personally he'd sign it. And we'll see if we can get through the bureaucracy to get this done. And the importance

of this is it would give the feds, the Homeland Security people, the FBI, everything. The power if they suspect there's a migrant criminal to take that person in and look at their to see if they've been deported. And if they have been, bang, they're charged immediately, and they go into the system 10 years. And you don't think 10 years in federal presidential is going to send a signal to the gangs in El Salvador in Venezuela? It will.

So this, I don't know who. and then if Democrats opposed it, then you would see who's opposing it, which would destroy them. So believe me, I'm on this. All right, Kamala Harris, 2006, going to run for Governor of California. I told you that. I'm not going to use the sound bite because I told you that, and you can look through the transcripts. So now as a poll, UC Berkeley Institute of Government Studies says, among Democrats, 72% would very likely or somewhat likely vote for Harris.

So Harris is going to be the next to government in California after Newsom steps down. If those of you were wondering what you're going to do. Smart life. Express yourself. That is so smart, but you've got to do it the right way. You've got to do it in an astute way. You can't be just raving. You know, you've got to do it.

And more humor you can do it. But it's good for you to express yourself because it gets stuff out, gets it out, okay? And it's good for other people to hear a very logical, passionate point of view. It's smart. Now, we have a poll on bill O'Reilly.com, and we asked, was I your humble correspondent, and it's still up, if you want to vote, fair to Donald Trump in a campaign? So, 92% of the 3,000 people who voted say yes. 8% said no, that I was unfair to Trump. Now, I say yesterday, I'll read some of those letters, and I will.

I'm not going to comment because that wouldn't be fair. I don't want to use my bully pulpit. All right, I'm just going to read the letters that I got that say I was unfair. First one comes from Jim, who's a concierge member, and my team will help Jim if he gets any trouble or he needs any advice. All right, Jim says, I believe you were unfair to Donald Trump because you never skipped an opportunity to denigrate Mr. Trump whenever you criticize Kamala Harris.

Okay. Dan, Michigan. Your analysis of Trump Harris was unfair simply because, according to you, Harris would lie while Trump exaggerated. Come on, Bill. All right. Gaylandino, Katie, Texas. I would like to confirm that you were unfair to Donald Trump

during the majority of your campaign messages in that you were always harped on all the negative aspects of him, not so much positive ones. All right, that's Katie, Texas. Darren, in Tennessee, do you really believe in your heart that Biden received 81 million votes in 2020. Thus, my opinion on why you were unfair to Trump

in your election coverage, I believe you should have had your staff dive in and at least give him the benefit of the doubt. Okay, well, on this one, I have to analyze data, not opinion. I said more than one time, if you believe election in 2020 was fixed, crooked, whatever, you're entitled to that belief. But no data has been put forth on a

mass level. But I always say Zuckerberg's money, 300 million? What happened to that? If I are Trump, I'd have my attorney general look at that. Okay, one more. Dave in Indiana, you were not fair to President Trump. You failed to mention so many of the things he has able to get done in his first presidency while undergoing two impeachments and all and on on okay so I didn't mention the things he got done I think it's a little bit emotional here we don't root for anyone we report accurately and you know I think my staff and I did one of the best campaign jobs in media history and 92% of you guys agree

It makes you very happy. All right, Smart Life, one of my favorite segments, and I think you guys concur. We're trying to help you out here every day. So, Centers for Disease Control, okay? Most Americans are now off the VACs and all of the pandemic stuff. That took a hit, right? But it's still a very, very methodical agency, and I pay it. attention to it. So it says that 16% of American adults now have diabetes, 16%

4% under the age of 40, 12% 40 to 59, 21% of adults 16 over have diabetes. I mean you're going to die sooner than you should die. 24% of American obese adults have diabetes. So that make sense because it's sugar, high blood sugar, that does it. Now, I've been pounding on this for what? Five years now, that you have to cut your sugar intake down. And there are beverages. I've showed you them. All right, I drink unsweetened iced tea, that kind of thing, and there's kind of sparkling ice I drink. That's a carbonated beverage, no sugar. You can replace. The soft drinks are killing you.

Diet drinks killing you. Sweet and iced tea is killing. Killing you. So look at the label. All right, then you got the cereals loaded with sugar, got desserts, you got ice cream. Your body can't take it. Can't.

Now when you're kidding, you're running around, and you're this and that, yeah, but once you become an adult and sedentary and earning a living, unless you're out on the line, all right, you've got to cut it down, or you're going to suffer, not just going to die. You're going to suffer. You don't take a shot every day?

You want the insulin? Is that what you want? So with millions and millions and millions of people having diabetes, you don't hear anything from the federal or state government that cut your sugar down. You hear, don't smoke, don't chew tobacco, don't do that. That's all over the place, not with sugar. Because the food companies are so powerful, they shut that down.

Enter RFK Jr. Dubious guy. No doubt about it in my mind, okay? He, according to Donald Trump, is going to get involved with the federal efforts to improve the nation's health. Target number one is sugar. If RFK Jr. does that, if he goes on a campaign to alert everybody to the danger,

I will change my opinion of him. Marlon. Final thought. I am a Luddite. Luddite is a person who has no technological skill, no mechanical skill. Can't do anything. That is me. Don't live in the cyberspace world, but we are going wild there.

This broadcast is broken down. Some of the stuff is on YouTube, Instagram, you name it. you name it. Some stats. So I just posted, I just posted a thing about Donald Trump and his goals. Right at the gate, a million three. Right at the gate, it's still up there. And I'll give you the address in a moment. All right, we had eight million views in less than two weeks on YouTube. Eight million, less than two weeks. All right, 80 million views in the past six months. 80 million on YouTube. So we have our own

YouTube channel. We want you to go there. It's YouTube.com slash Bill O'Reilly. There I am. Free. Free of charge. And it is different than the no-spin news. That's what I want to emphasize here. We don't. The thing on Trump

is personal observations for me, because I've known a guy for 35 years. And tomorrow, I'm going to to cut another one about the cabinet members and we went over them today in a hard news fashion today. I do a little more personal stuff. That's what I'm using this YouTube Bill O'Reilly channel for. More personal. Because I only have a certain amount of time every day and I've got

to get the news out, the facts out. But on YouTube, I can ruminate a little bit. All right? That's the difference. And boy, oh boy, it's just going crazy here. And it's changed the equation. But now we do a guest, the guest knows, not only is going to be seen on No Spin News, heard on our radio stations across the country, but millions of people all over the world are going to see it. And our sponsors, I mean, they're delirious because we reach so many people. So I want to, you know, you and I are in this together. It's a partnership here.

I left Fox. I took some employees with me and set my base on our operation. And then I took a considerable amount of viewers. You can still watch Fox, but you watch me because you can watch this anytime. That's the beauty of this. And the YouTube channel, you watch it anytime. You don't have to be there at a certain hour. Anyway, we're very pleased. We're very fortunate.

Having a nice Thanksgiving. And I thank God. And I do that literally, by the way. I am a believer that we have been able to make this operation such a success and have a positive influence on the country. Thank you very much for watching and listening to the NOSFIN News and we'll see you on Monday.