Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Highlights from O'Reilly's No Spin News - September 6, 2024

Episode Date: September 7, 2024

Highlights from BillOReilly.com’s No Spin News. Watch the No Spin News weeknights - become a BillOReilly.com Premium Member to watch.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

I'm happy to be here because we have two months to vote in a very, very historical election. And I want to spend the next two months educating as many Americans as I can to what is at stake. Now, many of you know, some of you don't. Our reach is much, much wider than it's ever been, even when I was on the O'Reilly Factor. We reach far more people now than I reached on the Fox News channel because of YouTube. And I'm going to, in the Smart Life segment tonight, I'm going to explain that to you. It's really some phenomenon. But anyway, we're going to stay ahead of this election story, and we're always going to tell you the truth.

I know many of you want Donald Trump to win, but if Donald Trump doesn't do something well or screws up, I'm going to report it, okay, because if I didn't, I'd be a hypocrite. And I'm not like the corporate media. And I'm relieved not to have to work for corporations any longer because they have agendas all day long. I have no agenda other than presenting what is true and going on in this country. And we'll start off at the talking points memo about how you cannot, cannot win the presidency. It's very simple.

If you're on defense, you can't win. Now, as you know, a week from today, my new book Confronting the Presidents Will Be Out. All right, I hope you take the time to read it. Very important book. But let's take a look at recent history. So Gerald Ford lost to Jimmy Carter. You remember that in 1976. And he lost because he was on the defensive about pardoning Richard Nixon.

Whereas Carter, much like Kamala Harris, had no real experience. at federal level. He was a governor of Georgia. Harris is a little experience, but both Carter and Harris never really accomplished anything at the federal level. But Carter beat Ford because Ford was on the defense. Then we had Reagan defeating Carter because Carter couldn't defend his record. Couldn't defend it. It was as bismal as abysmal as Joe Biden's record. Biden's probably a little bit worse because of the open border. But Reagan just trounced Carter because Carter was on defense.

He couldn't explain why the economy was terrible, why he couldn't get hostages out of Iran. And he got waxed. Then you had Reagan winning two terms, all right, because he had momentum, was rolling. Then Bush the Elder won, the vice president under Reagan, because he had momentum.

Reagan gave him that momentum. It's a handoff. But then Clinton beat him, Bush the Elder, because Bush the Elder promised no new taxes and then raised taxes, and the economy was in a recession anyway. So Bush the Elder was on defense and lost to a guy nobody knew anything about, Bill Clinton. You can't play defense and win.

Okay? Clinton sails through two terms. He was on defense because of the Winston. but the economy overrode it. And the American economy was strong. People said, ah, all right, as long as the economy's perkin, I'll vote for Clinton. He won't two terms. So then Bush, the younger shows up against Gore. Gore was on the defensive because of Clinton.

And Gore, as you'll remember, didn't want Clinton even campaigning for him. So Gore, in a very tight race, lost. then Bush won two terms largely on the 9-11 anti-terror situation. And then Obama came in and beat John McCain because the last few months of Bush the youngest of Bush the youngest term, the economy went into severe recession. And McCain could not explain how to turn it around. So Obama, another guy, nobody knew anything about wins. Okay.

Now, Hillary Clinton was on the defensive because nobody likes her. It wasn't about policy. They just didn't like her. So Trump beats her because Hillary, no matter what she did, people go, I don't like her. And there's enough people that won't vote for people who they don't like. Okay? And then Trump loses to Biden for the same reason that he was demonized so badly. and a lot of it was unfair,

that a lot of Americans, I don't like Trump. Though I'm going to vote for Biden, it won't come out of his basement. All right, I think I made my point. You cannot win the Oval Office being on defense. So Trump has to get off defense. He's got to stop with the controversies. It doesn't matter who's right and wrong.

If you go to Arlington and the Army says, don't film it for any purpose, and you get in a controversy with the Army, even though you may be right because Trump was invited there, it doesn't do you any good. Every day, Donald Trump's on defense. He's got to turn that around. He's got to put Kamala Harris on defense next Tuesday night.

Or he'll lose. Because the media is not going to stop. Trump himself has to put the vice president on defense. because the media won't. Okay. Now, whether he can do it or not, I don't know. If it were me, and I'm debating Kamala Harris, it's easy. And I'm sorry to be arrogant, supercilious, egotistical.

I am sorry. I don't mean to be. But I could dissemble the vice president intellectually in five minutes. Just ask your questions. The easy questions, like, hey, when Biden Harris took over, inflation was 1.4%. It went to more than nine. Why? Why, madam?

She can't explain it. She can't explain the open border. She can't explain the flip-flops that we'll get to. She can't explain anything. Do you believe that Kamala Harris understands the Middle East? And what's going on there? No. I would ask her three or four questions about Hamas, Israel, and she couldn't answer any of them.

Because she doesn't know. That's how you put her on defense. That's why that CNN interview didn't work. Okay. So summing up, Trump can win. But he has to put her on defense and stop any kind of. controversies. If they're fabricated and made up, and I'm going to get to that, I'll handle it. Other people will handle it. But he's got to stay away from personal attacks and creating

controversy. If he doesn't, he may lose. That's a memo. All right, so we're going to investigate almost every night on the no-spin news, some crazy thing that you've heard about and tell you the truth about it. All right, I think that's worthy. So tonight, one of the debate things will be about Kamala Harris's record. Now, you remember in the CNN interview, she went out of her way, said, I took on the cartels. And she did it at the convention, too. As Attorney General of California, I took on the cartels. Okay?

Come on. Roll a tape. I fought against the cartels who traffic in guns and drugs and human beings who threaten the security of our border and the safety of our communities. And I will tell you, these fights were not easy. We've investigated. We can't find one thing that she's done directly to harm the Mexican cartels. Not one. Not in California, not as vice president, not as a senator. Now, if you know one,

my staff's pretty damn good. All right? We can't find any. Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage, gold IRA.

They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401K, tax and penalty free. With billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A plus from the Better Business Bureau, you can trust American Hartford gold as I do. Please call 866-326-55-75-76 or text bill to 99-88-99. Again, that's 866-3-2-6-5-7576, or text bill to 998899. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to tune into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all size, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't.

So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. In California, as the Attorney General, she prosecuted cases that were brought to. her by state and local authorities. Her office didn't do it. She didn't do it. She was presented with evidence, gathered, and she prosecuted like every attorney general does. Okay? As senator, nothing. As vice president, she created a dialogue about smuggling. with whom? We can't find out. What did that dialogue lead to? Nobody knows. So she took them on. How? It's all bold. But again, if we missed it and you know it, Bill at

Bill O'Reilly.com. Very easy. Shoot it over to me. Okay, new poll. Media Research Center Conservative Group. They commissioned the McLaughlin and Associates Polling Outfit to who asked Democrats and Biden voters, independents, about certain things in his campaign. First question, are you aware Kamala Harris supported the elimination of private health insurance? These are Biden voters. Aware 19% unaware 81. Second question, are you aware? Kamala Harris promoted a fund to bail out violent protesters during 2020 riots. Aware 22, unaware 78. Third question. Aware that Harris supported abolishing ICE. Aware 23, Unawares 77. Harris named the most liberal U.S. Senator in 2019, are you aware? Aware 25, unaware 75.

And final two, Harris says she will not support criminal status. for migrants who enter the U.S. illegally, are you aware of that? 26, aware, unaware, 74. Harris supported reparations for slavery, are you aware, 29, unaware, 71. So that's proof that Biden, Harris, supporters, don't know anything. They have no idea, no blank an idea, if you want to get stronger.

Why? Because the media doesn't report it. And they watch left-wing media and read the New York Times and a Washington Post. So how would they know? They don't listen to Fox News or talk radio. These again are Biden voters, Democrats and independents. They don't know. That's the power of the media.

So what are the unintended consequences? Well, I ask to get the best guy on the tax, and we don't want ideology here. We want facts. His name is Scott Hodge. He's the President Emeritus of the Tax Foundation. He's got a new book out. It's called Taxocracy. What you don't know about tax.

and how they rule your daily life. All right, he joins us now from Washington, D.C. We're pleased to have you, Mr. Hodge. So I've always believed and seen, because I run three corporations, small, but nonetheless I have to pay all kinds of health costs and all that. When my taxation goes up, as Kamala Harris would impose,

then I have to pass that cost along. So that's what happens, right? Companies have to pay more in taxes. They pass it along to consumers. Is that what generally happens in a capitalistic society? A lot of effects come from raising taxes, Bill. And when you raise taxes on corporations, economists have actually found,

in addition to the costs that are passed along to consumers, we see a lot of those costs passed along to workers in the form of lower wages. And in fact, some studies have found quite interestingly that the most harmed workers are what we call marginal workers like women, low-skilled workers and younger workers. They see their wages reduced the most from those higher corporate taxes. I mean, we've all heard the adage when you tax something, you get less of it. And that's why politicians tax things. like sin taxes or, you know, taxes on cigarettes or wine or beer because they want to control

the consumption of those goods. The same thing happens with income and investment and business Let's get specific. So you're saying that if companies have to pay more tax, they're going to lay off workers to bring their costs of doing business down, correct? Correct. Okay. So that's number one. fewer jobs. Number two, and I believe that this rise of 21% in food prices, is a tax on the American home. It's a tax because it didn't have to happen. It was driven by misguided spending policies coming out of the Biden administration. Am I wrong? No, that's exactly right. I mean, when you put that much government money into the economy, you're going to get inflation. And back to your original point about the ultimate costs of those tax increases,

my colleagues here at the Tax Foundation have modeled the Biden-Harris tax increase plan that was put out earlier this year. We found that it would reduce the number of jobs in the economy by over 800,000. So 800,000 Americans would lose their jobs as a result of tax increases, and you'd see wages being reduced across the board. Sure. You take less or you don't. Yeah, or we'll find somebody who will.

Right. Yeah. You take, and it's interesting because the converse is true. In California, they raised the minimum wage for fast food workers to $20. And now the prices of the food went up for the consumers. And the hours for the workers and McDonald's and others went down. Of course. In case they don't work in many hours.

Now, this may be an unfair question, and if you don't want to answer it, I understand. Do you believe that Vice President Harris understands the economic implications of a vastly higher tax base in America? Not at all. I think she's driven by ideology, and progressives understand, or at least want, to make the tax code much more progressive, meaning tilted more to the rich, but they also want to use the tax code to redistribute that income from the top to the bottom. And what a lot of people don't understand is that the United States already has a very progressive

tax system. In fact, we tax the rich much more than most European countries, and we use the tax code to pass along to the poor much more than many European countries as well. She wants to make the tax code more redistributive, meaning take more. of that income, pass it along to the low income people through things like the child tax credit and other sort of welfare through the tax code, if you will. But shouldn't the government have a responsibility to try to get less affluence Americans to try to have policies that improve their circumstance? Any of these policies should be tied to work effort.

They shouldn't just be a handout through the tax code. And right now, we've turned the IRS into almost an extension of the welfare state. Because look at all the programs that it's managing, everything from child care to environmental issues, transportation, it's subsidizing cars, solar panels on your roof, all of these different things we're asking the IRS to do, and it's simply not capable of doing that. And she wants to use that IRS to do more of those kinds of things in delivering benefits to the various constituencies and favored groups here in the United States. I think it's worse than that.

I think she's a socialist, but I don't know whether she understands what a socialist is. And I'm not being mean because the woman has never, ever given an interview on economics, ever. So she ties in with Bernie Sanders a few years ago with the Medicare for All Act, which would wipe out private medical insurance in America. Now, you couldn't wipe it out entirely. That's unconstitutional. But you could make it very hard for doctors to have a concierge service and charge more than the government tells them they can charge. You can really terrorize those doctors.

She co-signs that bill. That's a socialistic bill. Bernie Sanders admits it. That's socialism. And I think Kamala Harris would have no problem with Washington, D.C. running the entire marketplace, the entire economy, dictating what prices you can have, how much money you can make, what material goods you can have before they come in and start taking stuff away from you. I think that she'd be fine with that. Am I wrong? She's already hinted that she's in

favor of doing something about price gouging. So they would have government bureaucrats stepping in to determine what are legitimate profits and what are simply price gouging. Now, I mean, that's kind of like, you know, deciding, you know, what's pornography? It's in the eyes of the beholder. These bureaucrats would decide for themselves what they consider to be price gouging and what are legitimate profits and they would try to control them. Well, the government would put a percentage. You can make this much money if you're Heinz ketchup. Right. That's what that, but that's socialism. Okay. Right. Exactly.

Right. And I think she's a socialist. I think that's what the progressive movement wants. They want to run the entire American economy out of Washington because they think that capitalism is evil, that it exploits minorities and women, and they're going to wipe out the private marketplace. Now, then you go into the Constitution. A wealth tax to me, because private property is sacrosanct, founding father's it, Americans have a right to private property. You, the government, can't seize it. By taxing unrealized gains on your house or on your stock portfolio, bond portfolio, that's basically taxing your stuff. All right? Now, you can say, oh, they do a property tax, I do all of that stuff. Well, that's a local situation. And the local people have the right to fund the schools and the roads and all that.

But Washington telling me, I want 25% of whatever you have every year. I mean, that's just insane. And I think it'll get thrown out in federal court. Well, and not only that, we have examples from around the world to prove how unworkable this is. Norway increased their wealth tax two years ago,

and they saw a flight and exodus of millionaires and billionaires who moved out of Norway to low-taxed places like Switzerland in order to avoid those high taxes. Wealth goes to where it's wanted, and if you raise taxes on it, it's very, very mobile, and people will flee. Capital is very sensitive to high tax rates, and it will flee to find better low tax. And corporations, if it's 28%, they'll go back overseas as well, correct?

Exactly. We've seen this show before, and we know how these taxes work and how the incentives that they produce to drive companies abroad to find friendlier places to do business. All right. So, you know, you can make an extension that if Kamala Harris is elected and the House and Senate go Democrat, we're going to be in for a real tough recession or even a depression. Mr. George, thanks for helping us out. The book, again, is Taxocracy, which you don't know about taxes and how they rule your daily life. Okay, let's go to New York City and migrant chaos. So right now I'm talking to you 20 miles away from Manhattan.

Front page New York Post yesterday says that police telling Post report is 75% of all arrests are now migrants who are undocumented in New York City. I do not believe that's stat. Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist and The House. and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One. Every week, I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, and even the president of the United States.

These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get, your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays. Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, the juicy details in the worlds of politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post

wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. It's not, I'm not demeaning the New York Post. It's not backed up. This is anecdotal. There are no stats. I think it's about 40 to 50 percent based upon what I know of the city. But there are no cash bail laws here.

So if you are a Venezuelan gang member or El Salvadoran. Doren M-13, and you are arrested for committing a crime in New York City. Not only are you out on the street within hours, but the city is forbidden to report your crime to Homeland Security because we have sanctuary city laws here. The combination has created social disorder never before seen in New York City. And the mayor, none of what to do. Oh, this is bad. This is bad. Yeah, it's bad. So every undocumented criminal wants to come here and Chicago and L.A. They want to come to those three metropolises because they know they won't be punished. Here's an example. So a guy 19 years old kicks a police officer. All right, his name is Darwin, Andres Gomez, Esquiel.

He pleads guilty. There he is smirking. after he pled guilty to kicking a police officer in Times Square, they give him a year. That means he's going to be out in way less than a year for kicking a police officer. All right? Now, you get kicked in the face, you get kicked in the groin.

I mean, that's a serious situation. No. So the anarchy that we in New York are experiencing is laid directly at the open board. policies of Joe Biden. I think Kamala Harris can address that? You think any journalist who would ever ask her about that? This is the danger here.

Not only has Kamala Harris know nothing about economics, and I'm positive of that, okay? But she can't connect the unintended consequences of that insane open border policy, which she supported. And you've got millions. of people going to vote for her? It was an old saying you get what you deserve.

I hope the United States doesn't deserve Kamala Harris. Join us now from Blavout, New York, north of Manhattan. John McLaughlin, who did that poll, and he is currently polling for President Trump. Were you surprised those numbers are so huge that people voting for Biden had no idea with Kamala Harris. record is no and and it wasn't a surprise bremposelle it was his idea and he did at the media

research center and he published it because last year we've done a study and we found that 35 percent of the voters uh pay attention to fox news newsmax conservative talk radio listen to your show etc and there's another 30 percent that are msnbc CNN NPR etc and another 35 percent who don't care don't focus and they have polar opposite views of the world of what's going on with the issues so when brent did this it was like he had a hunch uh that they just weren't aware of these positions because if you watch that democrat infomercial called the national convention um they they would repeatedly attack trump and mentioned trump but they never really said where they stood on the issues and and mentioned they'd hardly mention immigration they hardly

you know, what was going on with Hamas and the hostages, et cetera. They mentioned it one night. But in economics, they don't talk about taxes or raising people. No, and as you said, millions and millions of voters who don't care. They vote a motion. Now, Trafalgar, which I fear that's a pro-Trump polling. Would I be wrong in saying that, Trafalgar, pro-Trump? What I found is when I look at their surveys this year, them and insider advantage,

they've gotten more even. Last year, there might have been two years ago with some of the Senate races. They could have been more pro-Trump, pro-Republican. But I think when some of those Senate races didn't materialize, they... So you don't think that they're leaning in any direction. So Trafalgar has Michigan,

basically Trump winning by 4 percentage, 0.4 percentage. That's a tie. They got Pennsylvania, Trump winning by two, one, one point. And Wisconsin, Trump winning by one point. So it's essentially the three are tied, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Do you concur? I think we're a little better, but, you know, for me, the longer term view, having worked for Trump in 2016, work for in 2020, this is a lot better. to be in, cautious optimism, I listened to your introduction about what President Trump

needs to do with the debate, totally concur. If he, if he, if he, if he adheres to that advice and we can expose her on the issues and let her talk. Tell him that, because it's not hard. I mean, you can picture, John, you know me for a long time. Right. You put me up against Kamala Harris. What do you think is going to happen? Has she agreed to an interview yet? No, no, but I mean, in a debate, I don't even want to interview her because she's just going to spout things and I'd have to be disrespectful and I don't want to do that.

But in a debate, I just ask her questions. Question after question after question. You can't answer any of them. Right. And that's why she's not doing press conferences. That's why she's not doing. But they're not going to ask her anyway, just like Dana Bash didn't follow up on anything. Okay.

Now, you mentioned Insider Advantage and in the polling center. They have, this I find hard to believe, North Carolina, Trump is only up by less than a point. Is that true in North Carolina? That's, no, that's why I said we're a little better. Okay. But it's all the margin of error. And in Georgia, they have Harris beating Trump in Georgia.

Yeah, that's not true. But I don't know how that could be true. But it's a point of to, by the way, what's great about Georgia is what's really frustrating the Democrats, they changed the election law compared to 2020 when you had drop boxes all of the Democratic. Yeah, they tightened it up. But Lake and Riley, just that alone. Yeah. But I mean, you know, this poor girl murdered by the undocumented immigrant and the evidence is overwhelming. I'm not depriving them the due process. But I thought that was the end. But this is, is insider advantage, not your outfit. Nevada, they have Trump up by a point and a half. In

Arizona, they have a dead heat. What do you say to that? I think we're a little better in all those states, but again, it's like two, three points better. So we're in a close race, and it's better to be in our position than Camel Harris. What's interesting is we're speaking today. Gene's making plans to go to New Hampshire, Virginia, and Minnesota. I think you're worried about those states beyond the seven battleground states that are getting the most attention. When are you guys going to do a state-by-state in the swings? Are you going to do a poll soon? The Trump campaign doesn't release their polls except on a rare occasion.

So I hope we do a lot more polling, a lot more often. Yeah, it's better for your company. But you give them the polling they ask for it, just not made public, correct? Right. And we shoot straight with the president. If the election were held tomorrow, in your opinion, I mean, obviously you think your company has great credibility. Who would win? Trump would win.

But it's, again, it's 64 days. I tell you, the thing you got to watch is the early voting. Four of those seven states start mail-in voting. North Carolina starts on September 6th, three days for now. And then you have Pennsylvania where 40% of the voters will vote mail-in. That starts on September 16th, New Orleans, Wisconsin, September 19th, Michigan, September 26th. The Democrats are trying to rush the clock. And you've got David Plough, who was Obama's campaign manager, who worked for Zuckerberg in the 2020 election,

spending his 400 million to register both elect counties in those states, and then basically, you know, ballot harvest. And they would bring them in, whether it was Georgia or Wisconsin, et cetera. Well, you got a new Republican hierarchy at the RNC, Lara Trump, who says that she is countering that by having Republicans try to gin up their base to vote by mail as well. Do you see that? Yes, you see that plus also the filing legal cases, like in North Carolina. They just filed a case where it looks like over 200,000 voters weren't required to show driver's license or Social Security.

proof of citizenship. So we've got it now, they've let in, what, 15, 20 million illegal immigrants? And now they're trying to register them to vote in Texas. The Attorney General has groups nonprofits under investigation for actively trying to recruit illegal immigrants to vote. So the RNC is definitely stepped up the game and they're fighting. But you can't take anything for granted because they push back. Yeah, historically, the mail-in votes have always got always gone Democrat. It's because a lot of the voters who go for the liberal candidates are people who are disenfranchised and they don't participate. And so the ward captains,

Democratic ward captains, canvas apartment complexes and senior citizen home and they tell people how to fill out the votes and put it in the envelope for them. That's what's happening, right? Yep, exactly. And they'll go to nursing homes and they'll have unions. They'll go everywhere. But I wonder if Republicans are doing that, too. I don't know. Yes. And what's different is I think Republicans are more inclined to vote early in person rather

than trust the mail. Yeah. So it stayed as its own as its own thing. All right, John, keep dispositive anything that comes across your desk, you feel is interesting. I mean, my audience is just absolutely, you know, an information-based audience, and we want to get all the info we can get. Thanks again for helping us out. We appreciate it.

Okay, so we want to go on a record here. Not only do we want to knock out falsehoods, and I'll do that in a moment, but we want to actually tell you what the candidates are seeing and what is true. So Kamala Harris, as everybody knows now, even the people who don't pay attention, has flip-flopped on a lot of different things.

Roll the tape. Because we have a president of the United States who has created a fiction about a crisis at the border, and he has held up the United States government and its workers around his vanity project called a wall. There's no question I'm in favor of banning fracking. So, yeah, and starting with what we can do on day one around public lands, right? And then there has to be legislation.

We have to have a buyback program, and I support a mandatory buyback program. It's got to be smart. We've got to do it the right way. Okay, so now she says she'll sign legislation that can take. a border wall, now she says she's against banning fracking, and now she says that she's not going to support a mandatory gun buyback. So those are three. Now there's no doubt she flip-flopped on them. Okay? Why? And she says, well, my values are still the same. No. Why specifically you flip-flop on the wall fracking and the gun buyback? No. See, if you're Dana Bash, you've got to say that. You've got to look her in the eye and go, no. values that anything to do with it, you made these statements and now you're contradicting your statements and the American people need to know why you're doing that, period. That's how you interview. All right, back to the debate. Philadelphia, 910, next Tuesday, 9 p.m. Eastern

time. Last night on Fox, Trump did a town hall, and he attacked ABC News. which is holding the debate go they are the most dishonest network the meanest the nastiest but that was what i was presented with i was presented with a bc i think a lot of people are going to be watching to see how nasty they are how unfair they are i agreed to do it because they wouldn't do any other network okay so that's true all right the uh league of whatever voters ABC their turn was up. Now, I don't think Mewer, David Mewer, and Lindsay

Davis are going to be nasty and mean to Donald Trump. They're going to do what CNN did with the first Biden-Trump debate. I would be shocked. Neither of those two are top-flight interviewers. They're not.

I mean, I'm sorry. I don't mean to be disrespectful to them, but they're just not. They'll ask the obvious questions. Mostly they won't follow-up, as I stated. But I don't think Trump's going to have much trouble with ABC. He's doing that to put them on notice, to put Bob Eiger, the head of Disney runs ABC News on notice. That's why he did that. Okay, media madness. So as I mentioned, I have got an invitation to discuss

confronting the presidents out next week, September 10th, on NPR, not NPR, on PBS. I get a mixed up. PBS invited me to come on, okay? HBO invited me to come on, and, shockingly, CNN invited me to come on. Now, I've accepted the CNN invitation. I'll tell you when it's going to be. I'm probably going to do the PBS if we can work out the timing and all that, because I'm exceedingly busy next week. Not going to do the HBO thing, but I appreciate the invitation.

But I'd have to fly out to LA and I'm just up to here, you know. So we were very pleased because you don't see many non-liberal authors on any of those outlets. You never see a non-liberal author on CBS Sunday morning. Since the first of this year, now nine months in, not one. And they do books on a regular basis on Sunday morning, CBS Sunday morning, CBS. Yes. The program is run by Jane Pauley. She is the face of the program. You know her, former Today Show.

I've never met Ms. Pauley, but I, here she's a nice person, but she is the main anchor. So I sent her a nice email and just said, look, I hope you consider interviewing me on your program for confronting the president's. Ms. Polly did not reply to the nice email. That's disrespectful, but I forgive her. Okay? The reason she didn't reply is, you know what I'm anything to do with me? If Jane Pauley is going to preside over a weekly program and not book one non-liberal author, not one, you know the fix is in on CBS Sunday morning. So we called CBS and said, is this, are we getting this wrong here?

They would not reply. that's disrespectful. You should know it that Jane Polly looks like the nicest person in the world, but she's going, if Jane Pauley came in and said, look, I want to talk to O'Reilly about this book. It's going to be a huge book.

He's the biggest selling nonfiction author in the world. Then I'd be on. But you know any part of that? Because she is in the club. And she loves the club. Loves it. It's wrong. You should know it.

Smart life. Okay, and we're always looking out for you, and I've done this twice. This is the last time I'm going to do it, but it's so important. If you have insurance on your car or house or anything else, you know that you're getting killed

because I got killed. All right? And I'm looking at my bills going, this is insane. There is a website, PolicyGenius.com. PolicyGenius.com. They have recently come on as a sponsor of the NoSpin News and my operation. Now, I didn't make any deal with them. They just said, O'Reilly said good stuff about it, so we're going to advertise on this program. Fine.

I mean, it wasn't a deal. If you go to PolicyGenius.com, you then get a comparison of different insurance agencies and what they'll charge in one place. That's going to help you if you're interested in saving money on insurance. All right, here's a final thought. Plan ahead. I'm already planning for Christmas. All right? Why? Because I'm going to go out to California to visit friends.

And there are things I want to do. I'm not going to go. I'm going to go the day after Christmas out to California. Got lots of friends out there. I haven't been out there in a while. So I'm planning it. But you've got to get your airline reservations, your hotel reservation, you've got to get them in line if you want to go to the places that I want to go to, which are the popular

places. Okay? So I'm not going to tell you exactly where I've been because I don't want to frighten the citizenry, but I'm planning it now. You've got to stay ahead of things, all right, four or five months ahead. Some people even plan on their summer vacations next year. 2025 now, and that's not too far out. But always remember, you've got to get everything refundable because things happen. You've got to have your airlines refundable, your

hotels refundable, and usually hotels have fairly liberal policies in that regard. Don't do non-refundable because you get a hammered on that. Pay a little bit extra. That is the final thought. Thank you very much for watching and listening to the no spend news you want to reach me bill at bill o'reilly dot com bill at bill o'reilly.com name and town we're getting some now with no names in towns can't read it okay name in town see you again on monday