Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Justice Department Leaks, the New Russia Collusion, CBS News' Hillary Clinton Interview, Bad Socialism, Guest Doug Schoen & More

Episode Date: September 8, 2022

Tonight's rundown: Talking Points Memo: The Washington Post is using DOJ leaks in an effort to diminish former President Trump Democratic pollster Doug Schoen joins the No Spin News to discuss suspicious polling CBS News interviews Hillary Clinton, who speculates on the Trump raid Author and journalist Kenneth Timmerman joins Bill to discuss the harmful effects of socialism and the media This Day in History: German Luftwathe begins bombing Britain Final Thought: Shock and Awe In Case You Missed It: Read Bill's latest column, Biden's Battle of the Bulge. Get a BillOReilly.com Premium Membership today and get "Killing the Legends" free! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the NOS-FIN News for Wednesday, September 7, 2020, stand up for your country. Now, if you follow the corporate media, and I hope you do not. But if you do, you are hearing exactly what I predicted in mid-August that the Democrats are surging and will likely win the Senate and perhaps the House of Representatives in the midterm election on November 8th. This is what you are hearing almost every day. In addition, you are hearing that Donald Trump is the worst

person in the world and may wind up in prison because of the classified document situation. So this is a one-two punch. And that it's designed, as we said last night in our analysis of President Biden, it's designed to have Trump on the ballot in November. The Democrats believe that if they can make Trump the centerpiece of the Republican Party, that independent voters will not go GOP. That is the strategy, and the media allies in the corporations are carrying that out, and that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. So every day the Justice Department is leaking stuff about Donald Trump, every day. The primary conduit is the Washington Post, which yesterday reports, citing several unnamed sources, where have we heard

that before, that among the classified documents in Mr. Trump's basement was a nuclear capability analysis of a foreign nation. And this was the big story in the corporate meeting. All right? Now, on Fox and Friends, on, you know, the Fox News Channel, they actually said, well, what is Trump doing with nuclear analysis of a foreign nation? Well, how do you know that's true, number one? How do you know what's classified, number two? And why would he take it number three? But there's no, it's just they suck it up no matter what they pull out there. So just think about it for a minute. Why would Donald Trump take a classified document, top secret, about a foreign nation's nuclear capability? Why? He knows what it is, obviously from his national security briefings.

If he wanted to, he could have taken notes. It's not hard. Why would he take the document? There is no reason on earth. for Donald Trump to take a document like that. Can't use it anywhere. So why would he do it? The question is never asked.

Never. Now, this is exactly the same thing that happened in Russian collusion. Every day, someone in government leaked stuff to the New York Times and, you know, secondarily to Washington Post. Now, it's the Washington Post getting it. Every day. Oh, Donald Trump Jr. did this. Or another person did that. Never questioned. And then it all turned out to be bogus, the whole thing. So you would think that Americans would say, enough.

I'm not watching this anymore. I'm not reading these newspapers anymore. I'm going to watch O'Reilly or something else that has some kind of credibility. You would think. Now, it is happening to some extent. I mean, the network news is losing audience, and so is cable news. They're losing audience. But there are still millions of Americans

who hear this stuff, and it goes out on the internet. As I told you yesterday, a lot of my analysis goes on YouTube now, which is why I'm more famous now than I was six years ago when I was doing Fox. Where I go, people who run it up there, what is this? But anyway, the same game plan is in place. Same thing for Russian collusion as now. Now, I don't know what's going to come of the classified document thing. I told you yesterday, President Biden wants Donald Trump indicted before the midterms. There's no doubt that

that is true because of the president is indicted. That takes over the news cycle. And all the terrible things that are happening in America with the economy, with the border, with crime, they disappear. And Trump becomes the story 24-7. That's what Biden wants. It's so nakedly obvious. And the corporate media is more than willing to do his bidding. Biden's bidding. And that's the memo. Okay. One of the enablers of the, um, enablers of the, uh, Democratic Party is CBS News. And I'll give you something that you can't refute it. And I work for CBS News back in the 80s, all right?

You can't refute it. The CBS News Organization openly and avidly roots for the Democratic Party. Okay. So Nora O'Donnell is their anchor person on the nightly presentation. All right? And she is interviewing Hillary Clinton. About January 6th, roll the tape. I would not be honest if I didn't say I think there was a seditious conspiracy against the government of the United States, and that's a crime.

Led by Donald Trump. Led by Donald Trump, encouraged by Donald Trump. Led by Donald Trump? There's no evidence, none at all. And Ms. O'Donnell goes, led by Donald Trump. based on what, madam? What is that statement based on? And I got a kick out of Hillary Clinton.

I would not be honest if I didn't say, does anyone out there, anyone, liberal, conservative, independent think Hillary Clinton is an honest individual? Anyone? Bill at Bill O'Reilly.com, I'll protect you. But just email me and say, tell me why you think she's honest. Okay, so that's just one example, CBS, carrying out

the Democratic Party's wishes. Polling, insider advantage, don't know what it is, generic congressional vote, 500 likely voters, Democrats 45%, Republicans 44. So, according to insider advantage, more Americans are going to vote for Democrats in November in the House and Senate races than Republicans. How can that be possible? Arrest mustn't poll then says what is the direction of the country? And right direction 29, wrong track 65. Well, if the country is on the wrong track and the Democrats are in charge, then how could you vote for them again? Do you like the country being on the wrong track? It just doesn't stack. It doesn't stack at all. Now, I believe the Rasmussen poll at 65%, I think it's probably 70, of Americans think the country's on the wrong

track because it is. It's no, it's not like, I know 29% say it's on the wrong. It's on the right track, but those aren't really rational thinking people. Those are emotional people. And maybe one issue, abortion, whatever it may be, but they're not big picture people. And there's a lot of them. 29% of that stat, I mean, I think that number is legit. Okay? But in the real world where we live, the country's on the wrong track. It's going down fast. I was on with Hannity on the radio today. All you got to do is think about your personal circumstance three years ago when Trump was president and compare it to now. Is your wallet in better shape?

Is the border in better shape? Is the violent crime situation better now than it was? Every single issue. Yet, according to insider advantage, more people are going to vote for Democrats in November. I don't know. Maybe we're done as a year. as a country. Maybe it's possible. So let's bring in a very smart guy who looks at all a polling. His name is Doug Schoen. You've seen him on this broadcast before. He's a Democrat

political strategy. He's actually worked for Bill Clinton. And he's the author of the upcoming book, America. No, it's out. I'm sorry. The book, America, United or Die, How to Save Our Democracy. I've read the book, so I should know it's not upcoming. I should know it's out. It's a good book. All right. So before we get into the analysis, Hillary Clinton, am I wrong about that. You know the Clintons. I don't expect you to bad mouth him, Doug. I do not expect you to bad mouth him. That would be disloyal you work for them. But am I wrong in my analysis at CBS in that clip? No, you're not wrong. And I would tell you, Bill, in 2016, I got a little notoriety for saying that while I remain a Democrat and a partisan Democrat, I could not and did

not vote for Secretary Clinton. Didn't vote for Donald Trump, but couldn't pull. the lover for Secretary Clinton. Is that because of the honesty factor? Let's just say, my take on her is that she does not have the same abilities, intellect, skills, and persuasive charms

of her husband. All right. I think that's a fair assessment. Okay, so when you see an insider advantage poll, it says more Americans will vote Democrat in November than Republican, you say? I'm saying that you're basically right. The congressional polling we're seeing shows that the Republicans are almost certain to win the House, 65 to 75% likely, 20, 25 seats, the most likely result, where there has been some movement bill, mostly because of bad Republican candidates is in the Senate elections. But even there, Arizona is a good example. That state is underwater, and it's not underwater because it has a drought and it's so hot, but the state is suffering grievously because of the open border, which is a Democratic tenant. So how on earth could they vote for Kelly, a Democratic senator, senator running again? How on earth, if your state is being devastated right before your eyes by this rampant illegal immigration, how do you

How could you vote for a Democrat who sponsors it? Because Masters, the Republican, has yet to distinguish himself as a candidate, is an election denier, and has run his primary campaign on that. And he's not emphasized to the degree necessary issues like immigration, inflation, cast of cost of gasoline, in a way to maximize his support. The race, you're correct, is within the margin of error, but the Republicans have yet to take advantage fully of the opportunity they have. Is Donald Trump the face of the Republican Party, do you believe for most independent and GOP people? Is he the face of it?

Sometimes he is, sometimes he isn't. Your analysis bill was exactly right. The more the Democrats believe that he is the face, the better they think. they'll do, hence the rhetoric and actions you spoke of in your talking points memo. So when you have a powerful coalition like the Democratic Party and the corporate media coming together to maintain democratic power, it would seem to be hard to overcome that for the Republican Party. That's exactly right.

The Democrats have won a thing in addition to the organization of the party, which you allude to, which is a huge financial advantage. Only now are the Republicans stepping in through the super PAC of Mitch McConnell, the Republican minority leader, to close the funding gap. But Democrats have been outspending Republicans on Senate races, which is one of the other answers to your questions. about why Democrats are doing relatively well. Yeah, and a lot of that money is centralized with the Soros, far-left crew, those political action committees in Hollywood. Correct. A lot of Katzenberg money, Spielberg money,

I mean, these big Hollywood moguls voting against their own self-interest, but they can afford to have the bodyguards and the big walls where the regular working folks in Los Angeles have to go out every day under threat. But that's what it is. All right, Doug, we're going to bring Doug back at least three more times before the midterms because we get an honest take from him. And the book again is America, United Dye, How to Save Our Democracy. Okay, so the Trump factor in November is pretty well defined on this broadcast.

On Saturday, he gave a one hour and 56 minute speech in Wilkesbury, Pennsylvania. I had my first job in Wilkesbury Scranton at Channel 16 in journalism, but almost two hours. And it was broadcast on Newsmax, you know, and Trump was Trump. He entertained a crowd, a lot of bombasts, and a lot of interesting things that other politicians wouldn't say. But that is playing into the Democratic strategy. Now, yesterday on the radio, I was asked a very interesting question, roll of tape. Now, Bill O'Reilly, you know Trump better than anybody. You've not only written about him, you've toured with him, you've done the best interviews with him,

when people say, well, why does he have to talk like that? Why does he have to say anything? He has to. That's just him, right? I mean, he couldn't stop that if he wanted to. It's a complicated answer, but I'm going to give it to you as best I can. So Donald Trump is a danger junkie. Do you know people like that?

Yeah. But usually it's Joe Pesci or somebody like that. Yeah, people who like danger. I mean, I ran into them in the war zones in my career. They just like the adrenaline. and rush from danger. Mr. Trump falls into that category. He has to have an incredible amount of stimulation every day in his life.

It's not like what I did last week, go out to the eastern end, the Long Island, sit at the beach, read a few books, and plunk in the ocean. Supposedly sharks out there, but, you know, I enjoyed that. Trump could never do that, ever. He's got to have action. Instead of danger, these people use the word action. It's got to be action. It's almost like a gambler in Vegas who can't stop. It's got to be at the tables.

And so, in his life, Donald Trump embraces controversy. He embraces a personal, White. Always been that way. Since the time he's a little boy, and I write about that in my book, the United States of Trump. He has always been that way. And that gets them in a lot of trouble. However, it also got him elected to the presidency because people are so fed up with the standard politicians and the BS they spew every day that when Trump came in as a destroyer, as an avenger, they grabbed. gravitated toward him. Huh, that is a fascinating answer. And that is the truth. That's why Donald Trump does what he does. COVID shots.

So now the government is saying we've got to have a yearly COVID booster along with a flu shot. So as you know, I got four COVID shots, but I'm not getting this one until the federal government, not Anthony. Fauci, by the way, don't believe a word he says, until somebody from the CDC that I believe has some credibility and honesty comes out and says, if you get a yearly booster, this is why you should do it. Now I need a why, because I know so many people who got the four shots, the two originals and then two boosters, and I got COVID. Though if it's not going to protect me against COVID, then why am I going to get it? I'm a simple man. Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets. And meanwhile,

China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver. Theroux, the only dealer I trust, American Hartford gold. And you can do this. get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401K, tax and penalty free. With billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau, you can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326, 5576, or text, bill to 998899. Again, that's 866-326-5576-5576, or text bill to 998899.

Okay, journalism. So I've been in this journalism racket for 46 years. I have traveled to 84 countries. I have covered four wars, and that doesn't count being in the war zones of Iraq and Afghanistan. I didn't count that because I wasn't really covering the shooting. I was there to help U.S. troops. And I think I know the world pretty well. But there are the journalists who know a lot more than me, who's been in a lot more places and in a lot more danger. So when they write something, I read it. One of those guys is Kenneth Timmerman, who's worked for a number of U.S. media. He actually was a hostage in Lebanon taken hostage. He covered the Middle East, top to bottom. And he started out as a very liberal person as most journalists are. I wasn't. I was neutral when I got out of Boston University

and began my career. I wasn't one or the other ideology. I just wanted to go. good stories and report honestly. Timmerman was a left-wing guy in the beginning, but he changed. And when I was reading his book on vacation on page 326, he's talking about his wife, Christina, and himself. And he says, quote, both of us have seen socialism up close and personal. She in Sweden, I in France, and we hated it. Masquerading as benign, benevolence, a devoured individual liberty and elevated and unelected elite to positions of power where they can make decisions that touch the most intimate part of your lives, unquote. Kenneth Timmerman joins us now from Florida, and he has a book that I read,

and the rest of history, tales of hostages, arms dealers, dirty tricks, and spies. So we appreciate you coming on, Ken. Creeping socialism in America, how big a problem is it? It's a huge problem. And I worry about our children and our grandchildren, Bill. And I really fear that we fell asleep when we had them in high school and we didn't pay attention. We said the public schools are going to take care of it. And they socialize them. They turn them into young socialists. And I'm very, very worried about that. I saw it, as I said, up close and personal, where the government wants to control every aspect of your life in France, for example, to start a company. Well, you begin by paying 42% social taxes for every employee that you hire. It's a great incentive to not start a business. So I saw that. My wife saw that.

And we saw what a threat to individual liberty and freedom it was. Yet millions of Americans are gravitating toward the progressive movement. The media certainly is, certainly propping that movement up in America. It's almost inexplicable because what you're saying is absolutely fact-based. and true. So why are they doing it? Well, I think it's a cultural thing. The media, as you mentioned, is left wing to begin with, especially here in the United States. You know, when I give talks around the country, Bill, I introduced myself. I said, I used to call myself a journalist when that was an honorable profession. And today, it has become much less so in the eyes of most Americans

because of fake news. The story I tell at the end of the book, the day that journalism died in American, July of 1994, I was hired by Time Magazine to investigate the sell-off of military technology from the United States to communist China. And we had a big story together, four pages, ready to go in the magazine. Friday afternoon, I get called in by the editor. And he says, Ken, we're pulling the story. And by the way, you're fired. I said, well, what happened? You love the story two days ago. And he said, well, we got a call from somebody in the Clinton administration, and they're very upset with you. They didn't like the questions you asked them. I said, wait a second. I thought that was my job to ask questions that might disturb people in power. They said, no, they didn't like

the questions you ask, and this is our administration. Whenever a journalist says, this is our administration, it's over. Yeah, there's no journalism involved. But it's interesting. You got some revenge because Time Magazine collapsed, all right? It's not a factor anymore. You can't even find it. And Americans, they caught on not as quickly as you because you were fired over following a story that was true, but the Clinton administration didn't want the folks to know that hardware and military provisions were being sent to our enemy China. And of course, nobody knew that. You did a number of stories like that. One of them caught my eye about Saddam Hussein's nuclear activities under Bush the Elder. So there was no question. That's a

Saddam Hussein back then was trying to get a nuke as Iran is now. But that story was largely suppressed as well, was it not? It was. And the way it was described to me by people in government after the first Gulf War was that we thought that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear program and he was five years from the bomb. After we went in there in 92, 93, 94 with the United Nations weapons inspectors who I helped, And I talk about that in the book. We discovered that he had five nuclear weapons programs, and he was one year from the bomb.

It shows that U.S. intelligence was horrible. They had very little accurate intelligence on what he was doing. And they didn't talk to people that they could have talked to. I interviewed in Baghdad the head of his uranium enrichment program. I interviewed the head of his chemical weapons, of Saddam's chemical weapons programs, the head of his missile programs. Nobody paid attention to those things in the 80s. When I went to Saddam's Weapons Fair in 1989, his coming out party when he showed all of this stuff,

including Gerald Bull's super gun, the one that he wanted to fire at Israel, he had it there at a 135th mockup. I was one of two Western reporters there. And the other guy was from Jane's Defense Weekly. It was pathetic. And it was, and the reason was U.S. government was using Saddam Hussein as a bulwark against Iran and didn't want to shake his whatever he was doing for them. But that then fast forwards into after 9-11. And one of the things as a journalist,

and, you know, it's a very small fraternity, Kent, you and me and maybe 50 others who have really devoted our lives to the craft and take it seriously and want to be honest. But one of the things that haunts me is that I bought into the Saddam weapons of mass destruction, which led to the American evasion of Iraq, which led to a lot of destruction for this country. And I continue to go over it and over it and over it. So when you wrote about the earlier weapons program, I know you weren't on the theater, in the theater after 9-11. But it was plausible, and New York Times put it on page one, Judith Miller, that Saddam did have weapons of mass destruction.

He wasn't allowing U.N. inspectors in, and we actually had to do it, and that's the tack I took. But it was wrong. How was it wrong? Well, I think it's a nuanced story, Bill. It's a nuanced story. There is a lot of it that was right. There are lies, however, that the CIA told to Colin Powell, and Colin Powell then told at the U.N., and he was ashamed of later on. Those lies, by the way, I believe, were planted by people at the CIA and the State Department to embarrass George W. Bush. I tell that in another book of journalism called Shadow Warriors. But look, we know the UN inspectors were telling us at the very moment that U.S. troops were going into Iraq in 2003, that Saddam's missile factories were continuing to churn out long-range

missiles, which were forbidden, which were not allowed under the disarmament clauses that were restricting him. We know that he had thousands of tons of chemical weapon agents, because we captured them later on after the war and in 2007 get this bill this was nobody paid attention to this in 2007 the new iraqi government sold to canada a thousand tons of uranium that saddam hussein had stockpiled to make a nuclear weapon so all of those things were found you use the uh the word nuanced and of course in our country we don't have any nuance anymore it's Bush Cheney lied, people died. You know, and it's just like I'm sitting myself going, oh, man.

Last question for you. When you began as a young reporter, you were left. Is that correct? Yes, I was. Why were you left? I think it was just the kind of institutional thing. It was where I was. I was in Paris running a literary journal as an expatriate out of Shakespeare and company.

and all of the media was left-wig at that point. I was pro-Palestinian when I went to Beirut in 1982. Well, the Palestinians cured me of that. I was supposed to be their guest. Well, they took me hostage and made their guest for 24 days. Not exactly the way that I had expected that to happen. They tortured me. I came to Jesus at that moment in the depths of the underground cellar,

and I understood that my Savior had undergone far worse pain, a hundred times worse than anything I went through, and he went through it for me. And that also was a transformational experience. And I went back to Israel after that. I went back to the West Bank. I spent time with Palestinian refugees and refugee camps. I stayed with them overnight.

I spent time with Palestinian guerrillas overnight in the Baccah Valley. And I treated people as human beings. But gradually, bit by bit, I understood not only were there two sides of the story, but Israel's story was far more compelling than the Palestinian victimhood that the media was telling. And then being based in Europe, you saw the socialism, as we quoted at the beginning of the segment, and I agree with you 100% or not. Okay. So the book is, and the rest is history, tales of hostages, arms, dealers, dirty tricks, and spies. Kenneth Timmerman.

It's out August 30th, so you can get it everywhere. Kent, thank you for all your good reporting, and thanks for appearing on the program tonight. Thanks so much, Bill. It's my pleasure. All right, smart life, where we try to save you money because everybody needs. needs to save money because inflation is hurting all American families unless you're super rich and very few people are that. So gas buddy.com. I mentioned it before, but this is really a fairly important website. So gas buddy.com chronicles 150,000 gas stations in the USA, Canada,

and Australia. So if you're going down under. if you go there there's an app i can't i don't know apps i can't explain but you just put in where you live and they tell you where the best price gasoline is for your car okay so this is a tremendous service it's free they don't want anything you could sign up for uh you know various stuff if you want but it it's a great deal so gas buddy one word com. This day in history, September 7th, 1940, 82 years ago, Adolf Hitler ordered the German Luftwaffe Air Force to bomb civilian targets in London and other British cities that happened for 50 consecutive nights. Okay, 100,000 people were hurt, 43,000 civilians killed in the blitz.

Blitz. The name Blitz comes from the word Blitz-Krieg Lightning War. So Hitler knew that this was barbaric. He didn't care. Why would he care? He's a mass murderer. He wanted to break the spirit of the British people and knock out all of their manufacturing, which is why he did that. But it worked against him as the Royal Air Force, the RAF, then took to the skies and knocked out the Luftwaffe once and for all. in the Battle of Britain. It's a tremendous achievement for the British people. Winston Churchill, of course, the leader back then. It is one of the most stunning parts of World War II, and very few Americans really know about it, but I wanted to bring it to your attention. 82 years ago today, the blitz bombing of Great Britain and London began. Okay, got a good mail segment. A lot of people confused about the Trump document thing and then a new program that I am launching that I will tell you about in a final thought. Right back. Power, politics and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post

columnist and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One. Every week I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmen. makers, newsmakers, and even the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. Hey, I'm Caitlin Becker, the host of the New York Postcast, and I've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays.

Every morning I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, the juicy details in the world's politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast. Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. We got Leo concierge member. Check that program out. Leo has direct access to me. O'Reilly, what do you think the chances are? The left planted documents of President Trump's pile when he took, when they went into the basement. Zero chance, Leo. Nobody planted documents. That would be a felony. You remember that there are FBI whistleblowers now that are talking about the corruption in the Bureau.

If an agent saw that, that wouldn't be kept secret. Linda, so one or two people in Trump administration packed the documents from the White House and sent the boxes to Mar-a-Lago, maybe or not, they gave Trump a master list of what we should. Well, of course it was a master list. Of course. But did Trump go over this stuff? I would be shocked. But we'll find out.

His lawyers certainly know. Mike Wilson, North Chesterfield, Virginia at the beginning. how did the National Archives know documents were missing from the White House? Good question from Mike Wilson. Classified documents are cataloged. They're cataloged. So the National Archives know and the National Intelligence Agency's now. Patricia Kalin O'Fellon, Missouri, could you please comment on how the cases of Hillary taking classified documents versus President Trump's taking class doctors are different? You know, look, I'm not even going to get into this until we know exactly what Donald Trump did or did not do.

We know what Hillary did. That case is closed. She took classified documents. She destroyed evidence of that. We know she wasn't prosecuted because of criminal intent, said James Comey, the FBI. Was there criminal intent on Trump's part? I don't know. I don't know what happened.

So we've got to wait. Moses Gutierrez, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Will his whole mess with the FBI? and the Department of Justice go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Likely it will, particularly if Trump is indicted. Supreme Court will probably be involved. DeWitt on the message board, when law enforcement organizations cease to prioritize law enforcement, we are in trouble, just ask L.A. and San Francisco, how that is working out for them,

and Chicago and New York, and Baltimore and Philadelphia, and on and on, and on. Actually, you are correct, DeWitt. Once law enforcement is diminished, crime and crime. spirals were all in danger. Dean Kinzer, Pullman, Washington. If Hunter Biden were indicted now, I'm sure his father would just pardon him and there would never be justice. If Hunter Biden is charged with federal crimes and the president pardons him, it'll be a huge scandal. Huge. Michael Thomas, Newport Beach, California.

Bill, other than being newsworthy, why is it important to know who the whistleblower was, the Mar-A-Lago raid? The whistleblowers, those who accuse President Trump of crimes, will be en masseed if there is an indictment because every American has a right to face his or her accuser. That's why it's important. Tuan Wen, Liberty Township, Ohio. Bill, do you think there will be legal action about the Biden student loan forgiveness program? Yes.

It's very flimsy what he did, and I believe that there will be lawsuits against it. Lou DeMayo, Newport, Ritchie, Florida, finished killing the killers. Outstanding. I learned a great deal. Disturbing Rita the Kayla. the Kayla Mueller issue. Looking forward to killing the legends. Well, thank you, Lou.

Number one, Kayla Mueller's family are as brave as any family I've ever seen in America. And that alone is worth reading Killer the Killers. Killing the Legends out September 27th. Advanced sales is pretty strong for this book. It's cultural history. It's going to be the most controversial book of the year. You can get it on Bill O'Reilly.com, on Amazon, And you order now, you pre-order, you get it first.

And I'll be very interested to hear the reaction from killing the legends. It's a little bit different, but it's the same style. And it's stuff you don't know. I gave it to a good friend of mine, a read, a journalist. And he said, I thought I knew these people. And it was amazing how much that we uncovered about that. Okay, so if you become a premium or concierge member or re-up, you get killing the killers, killing the legends, any of my books free. Greatest deal? I hope

you take part in that. Word of the day, do not be a nudnik. Now, this word I used when I was a kid in Levittown, N-U-D-N-I-C-K. Now, most of my friends couldn't spell it. Nud-Nick is a great word. It's God, but I'm trying to bring it back. So do not be a nudnik. All right, so we got a new program coming up, a brand new program, and I think you're going to want to hear about it. So I'm going to tell you about it in a final thought when we come back. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to turn into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here

to cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. Okay, so Vidgo is our streaming partner, and Vidgo will give you entertainment and sports for much less than the cable companies do. okay and you can just go to vidgo.com and check it out so you can see for yourself but as part of our partnership i am doing a weekly program for vidgo a brand new program called shock and awe shock and awe what shock and awe is and it starts on friday september 9th and you'll see it

any time you sign up the vid code you stream so you go on anytime you want it's a interview program along the lines of night beat now those of you who are older may remember nightbeat with mike wallace as you know mike wallace was a friend of mine and i watched everything he did very closely nightby was in the 1950s as mike wallace smoking blow and smoke into his guest say, well, I don't smoke. I'm not going to blow any smoke. I never blow smoke. But the interview program was right on it. No BS. So I took the night bee concept and I brought it into shock and awe. Now, on Friday, the first episode is the violence in the National Football League. You'll never get this from sports reporting they will never tell you what really happens on the field in what is now

the most popular entertainment in this country it is a bill billions and billions of dollars okay in the NFL I watch the NFL now I played football so I know about the violence but you don't So I've got Joe Namath, Rob Gronkowski, and a special team's NFL coach, Mike Westoff. These are three of the most honest guys I could find, and that is the hallmark of shock and awe. I will not put on a guest who will not tell the truth, no matter how difficult the question is. And believe me, I ask difficult questions. So when you hear what Namath and Gronkowski and Westoff say about what is actually happening before your eyes in these NFL games, you're going to be stunned. That's why I'm calling it shock and awe.

And then the next program, which will be on the next Friday, the 16th of September, will be ranking President Biden. in his first 18 months in office. Is he the worst president ever? Is he not that bad? I've got three presidential historians lined up. And again, this is no cupcake. So we're going to do this shock and awe every week for Vidgo. Tomorrow on this broadcast, I will run a clip of the first show.

But I hope you go to vidgo.com. Check it all out. I can guarantee you're going to like these programs. Thank you for watching the NoSpin News tonight and listening on the radio. We will see you tomorrow.