Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Looking Out For You - October 12, 2025

Episode Date: October 12, 2025

Who's looking out for you?  Bill O'Reilly is.  This is a presentation of his non-No Spin News commentaries collected into one weekly podcast, available to you every Sunday.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

At Desjardin, we speak business. We speak equipment modernization. We're fluent in data digitization and expansion into foreign markets. And we can talk all day about streamlining manufacturing processes. Because at Desjardin business, we speak the same language you do. Business. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us. And contact Desjardin today.

We'd love to talk, business. Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the latest edition of Looking Out for you. Let's get started. I want to talk about poor leadership because it's really getting worse in our world today and quite a lot of problems. And there's one big reason why, ideology. So if you are going to vote for some. give people power, whether it's in your own town or county, state, country, whatever it may be. And you're voting because you like what they say, you may be making a mistake. You've got to see what they've done, all right, how effective they have been in helping

people. That's what the key to leadership, public leadership, is all about. Are you a problem solver? Do you help people? Now, we are in a country where I'd say 40% of Americans despise the president of the United States. They hate them. Trump. Hate them. And Biden pretty close to that. Pretty close. And I think that's foolish. You evaluate on what the president's do. Not what they say. Every day I get my liberal friends, oh, yeah, what he said. I don't care what he said. Okay. It no matter what he says, matter what he does. All right, sometimes I agree with Donald Trump. Sometimes I don't. And I let you know. But generally speaking, when you compare the Trump administration to the Biden administration, in my opinion, there is an improvement in this country.

Not sociologically, strife is still very high, but nuts and bolts, nuts and bolts, okay? So the system has been changed, and it may not work, but it looks like there'll be more high-paying jobs, for example. The oil prices are absolutely coming down, OPEC just increases production.

And that's because of Trump. I think Trump will be able to get some kind of deal in Gaza. Biden never could have done a million years, all right? Ukraine, you know, Putin's a crazy guy. We all know that. But the vision seems to be rational to me. Now, there is irrationality, you know, the part of, you know, on the part of Donald Trump and every other president.

Barack Obama, you know, hope and change, okay, the green movement, you know, let's put the windmills, the windmills don't work, and, you know, the energy costs going up. And so good leadership. Now, I'm going to give you two examples, and both are in left-wing cities, and I apologize for that. I was looking around for a conservative city that was a mess. There are some in trouble, but not to the extent the liberal cities are. It's not even close. So Chicago is the big example.

About 4,000 people have been murdered there over the last five years. 80% of them African American. About 4,000 people. It's a lot of dead bodies on the streets. Okay? and most of the killers get away with it. Now, they're being murdered these people in Chicago by the drug gangs primarily that are fighting for turf and that they're involved with extortion.

They're involved with every crime in the world. The local Chicago authorities can't handle it. And the governor, J.B. Pritzker, an avowed progressive, doesn't even try. All right? So there's been no improvement in five years. The murder rate's coming down a bit, but then the focus now goes over to other crimes. I'm not exactly sure why the murder rate is coming down a bit, but it is. It's got to be fair.

We're still a colossal violent problem, south side of Chicago in the minority neighborhoods. Everybody knows that. Everybody except the mayor of the Windy City, row it. This is not about deportation. This is not about community. safety. This is, quite frankly, this is about for-profit. We know that there is an investigation right now that's underway with Tom Holman, who took $50,000, $50,000 from two FBI agents because Tom Holman made a promise to direct contracts to the very people who are running these

detention centers who actually gave over almost $3 million to President Trump's campaign. the President of the United States of America has declared war on poor people. Number one, Mr. Johnson just convicted Holman, no due process, and he doesn't know anything about it. How could Johnson know? And there isn't a formal investigation. We check with the Justice Department into the Director of Vice. Maybe there will be. The allegations is the allegation.

But allegations, you know, for a sitting mayor to say, Tom Holman took $50,000, that's defamation. Homer could sue a guy. Easy. Trump sued and won in settlements, okay, with ABC and others. Can't do that. But Johnson doesn't believe in due process.

And that's where the leadership comes in. You can't have somebody run in a city that doesn't believe in due process. You can't have it, all right? It's just one chaotic thing after another, after another, after another. So, president has declared war on poor people. Why would I do that? Why?

It's to Trump's benefit to elevate as many people as possible into middle class status. And therefore, you pay fewer entitlements and just on a humanitarian base. You want people to do better. But no, no backup for that. No, Johnson. So they say what they want because they know that some of their constituency believes this. People believe what they want to believe. So you feed right in.

But when you hear a statement that's stupid, you got to go, you can't vote for a guy like that. You can't. The same situation exists on a lesser extent in Los Angeles. So, 1,200 people have been murdered over five years there. Los Angeles is a troubled town. Everybody knows that. Leads the League of Homeless. Quality of life has declined.

People are moving out like crazy. Tourism is down, on and on and on and on. Well, Karen Bass is the mayor of Los Angeles. No solutions at all? No. Johnson has no solutions in Chicago. None. None. He's defaming people. The war are poor people. He got no, oh, I'm going to go in and solve the violent crime problem. How? He didn't even want to solve. He doesn't know how to solve it. Karen Bass, similar situation, L.A., ruling.

When I was there in Congress during Trump's first administration, they made profound changes to our judiciary system. And then you have the Supreme Court. After two decisions on the local level, the state level in California, around racial profiling of Latinos, which we refer to here as the hunting of Latinos that has created a blanket of fear around this city and has had detrimental impacts to our economy. We had two court decisions, and then the Supreme Court basically gave a green light to racial profiling. A green light to racial profiling. And so the Supreme Court wants, according to Mayor Bass, the federal authorities who profile racially American citizens. But they're not American citizens, are they? No. She's talking about undocumented migrants, where she has no problem.

Mayor Bass is no problem accepting every single, no restraints, okay, person who illegally crosses the border, gets in here overstays a visa, go to L.A. I don't want any I'm not going to enforce anything I'm a sanctuary city I'm not going to do anything I don't care what they do where they go I don't care how many resources they take up this is poor leadership this is not problem solving my friends in L.A. are going absolutely nuts and they say the quality of the life over the last five seven years just decline. I was in Westwood, California, right by UCLA, earlier this year. And Westwood used to be a jewel, you know, and it's shocking the deterioration, physically deteriorating. A drug addicts

everywhere, shoplifting everywhere, no police presence at all. Shocking. When you elect mayors like Johnson and Bass and now in New York City, Mamdani? We're going to get more death, more destruction, poor leadership will kill you. And that is not highlighted enough in this country. So are you in full-blown panic over Mamdani? lots of people are with good reason as the election is less than a month away and the communist as a commanding lead we are awaiting new polling since mayor adams dropped out but i don't expect andrew quomo to be that close however it's not over till it's over as yogi bearer once

said, but the spector of financial collapse and out-of-control violent crime, as a lot of people very worried. So let's look at the money aspect of this. So we reported last week that New York City has lost 1.5 million residents over the last few years. Most of those people, big money money, incomes, paying substantial taxes. Gone. The people have been replaced by migrants and service workers, union people, that kind of thing, where the tax revenue is much, much lower. So the big money now is in the corporations, and they are located in Manhattan. the lower part of that borough. You all know that, Wall Street, and on and on. These corporations pay an enormous amount of tax to New York City and state. Well, they're leaving, too. So J.B.

Morgan Chase now employs more workers in Texas than New York City and a whole bunch of others. I could give you the names, but trust me on it. Goldman Sachs. They're moving to Texas or Tennessee, not so much Florida. I don't know why. But Austin and Dallas are really, really gaining. In fact, New York City's financial services workforce has grown by only 4 percent in the last six years. Austin has grown 27 percent, Charlotte, North Carolina, 21 percent, Dallas, 11 percent. Dallas 11%. That is big money fleeing the state. Why should you care? Because once the city goes

into a spiral of debt where it is now, okay, then bills don't get paid. Then chaos mounts. So I submit to you that if we have a mayor, ma'am, Donnie, we're will have an exceedingly filthy city. Garbage will be picked up. Rats will be everywhere. The city will decline because overtime costs will have to be cut because the city's not going to have the money. Pay to workers overtime. You know, on Long Island Railroad, there are people, conductors, making $250,000 a year. It's crazy. And that is the liberals giving the unions what they want across the board. Well, the only got to pay for that. The city's

got to pay for that. Now, Mamdani will raise taxes and I'll drive more people out. Let's take me, for example. I live 22 miles away from Rockefeller Center. And I used to go in the city every day. Now, I go

in maybe three times a month, four times in a month, tops. And I never drive in. I take the L-I-R-R. because you can't drive in, going 22 miles can take you an hour and 45 minutes because the traffic is out of control. This is a city in decline, okay? And Mamdani is going to make it a hundred times worse. So all I can be is Paul Revere. I can warn and warn and warn. I know the people

who don't know anything aren't listening to WABC, they don't seek information, they don't care. Mandani is going to give him free stuff so they'll vote for him. Okay, the cliche is, be careful what you wish for, because boy, oh boy, is going to be big, big trouble on a horizon if this guy gets in. And that'll doom Hockel, by the way, because things will be so bad in a year's time,

Hokel, I don't even think she'll be able to run. but we'll see if my predictions come true i want to get into your wallet not literally but if you live in new york city we are the highest tax people in the united states of america it is insane so the uh new york city sales tax is about nine percent now and then you pay city income tax to boot and then you pay a commuter tax if you want to drive in and out on and on and on but you pay extra to the city and state for almost everything about a real estate you buy a house you sell a house big tax commercial rent tax prepared food and beverages tax taxed gas electricity refrigeration steam phone TV cable tax tax tax you go to a

barbershop beautician taxed hair restoration taxed manicures pedicures on and on hotel taxes are insane if you have to stay at a hotel in Midtown you look at a thousand dollars a night in many places If you want to hire a cleaning person, taxed, health club, taxed, salon, taxed, alcohol, through the roof, tobacco, cigarettes, you know, tangible personal property, taxed if you want to sell it. Have you, say you have a garage sale, you want to get rid of some of the stuff that's been hanging around. Well, chances are you're not going to report what you sell, but if they catch you, they can find you. You've got to pay tax on stuff you sell on your front lawn. This is a song by the Beatles taxman, and that drove the FAP 4 out of England.

They all came here to live because it was tax, tax, tax, tax. Now Mandani, if he's elected, he wants to raise the city income tax by 2% for those who earn more than a million a year. And get this, the corporate tax, he wants to raise four and a quarter percent. Corporations is going to go, no. Not all of them, but half of them. Especially if you have a small business, you're not going to be able to do that. You're out of here. and of course the more people that leave the fewer tax receipts that come in mandani has to know that

but he isn't care he's just selling i'm going to tax the rich corporations the rich people and give you who don't have much money their money income redistribution but there comes a point where in life you have to make a decision for yourself your family your legacy. I didn't even get into estate taxes when you die. New York State will come in. So will the federal government. They'll take most of your stuff. If you have any savings or investments or your home or whatever it may be, they're going to come in for a big piece. And so we're living in a country now where we're not really free financially. We can earn a good living. But the government more and more and more is saying, I want your money. I want

your stuff. Now, next is the wealth tax where the, and this would have to be passed by the Albany legislature. Believe me, at this point in Albany, they do it. Hogle would probably veto it because Hogle's on the ropes. But the wealth tax is where a tax appraiser from the state of New York would come into your home, write down everything you have, and then if the state deems it a certain value, they tax it. even though you've already paid tax on the dollars used to buy your stuff. So if you have an expensive car taxed, furniture taxed, gold coins taxed, that's a wealth taxed. And what that is is a confiscation of private property.

That's communism. That's Mandani. All right. The government would take what you have. That's what happens in Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea, China. You know, when I was over in China, nobody has. a 401k. I mean, come on. So anyway, that's what we're looking at here. And that's why people are leaving, a million and a half in the last five years. And if Mandani's elected, it'll be another

$500,000 at bail, in my opinion. You know, New York City has more Jewish people living in it than any other place outside of Israel. And you would think that Jewish New Yorkers would not be supporting Zoran, ma'am, Donnie. But some of them are, which is incredible to me. That would be like Irish people in Woodside saying that they love Prince Charles, okay? It's King Charles now, you know. I just don't understand. I know liberalism is ingrained in the Jewish community in many places in America.

It has to do with being the underdog and all that. I understand the socio-cultural aspect of it. But Mandami is really an anti-Israel person. I'm not going to say he's anti-Semitic. I don't think that's fair. I don't know the man. But he certainly despises Israel, no question. So it puts out a statement yesterday on the two-year anniversary of the Hamas brutalality

took at least 1,200 Jewish lives. He said two years ago, today, Hamas carried out a horrific war crime, killing more than 1,100 Israelis, kidnapping 250 more. I mourning's lives pray for the safe return of every hostage still held, and for every family whose lives were torn apart by these atrocities. In the aftermath of that day, Prime Minister Netanyahu and the Israeli government launched a genocidal war. A death toll that now exceeds 67,000, with the Israeli army bombing homes, hospitals, and schools into rubble. Every day in Gaza has become a place where grief itself has run out of language. I mourn these lives pray their families that have been shattered.

Our government has been complicit through it all. This must end the occupation of apartheid must end. So this is the usual overstatement. It's a war. It's a war between the Israelis and Hamas. And caught in that war are civilians that have been killed. Okay? Mandani is not wrong about that.

But picture this. Mexico comes across the border in Arizona and slaughters 1,200 people in Tucson. and then runs away, and into the border cities, Juarez, and the rest of them that lined the border, Nueva Laredo, all of that. And the United States does what? What do we do? You get 1,200 Americans dead because Mexicans came across the border and slaughtered them, women, children, everything, the same thing.

So, of course, the U.S. military would go in and destroy the terrorists, the Mexican terrorists, who did this. And in the process, you would have civilians killed. That happens in every single war. It has never been any different. Okay. And, you know, if you know any history at all, you know what? what I'm saying is absolutely true. But Mandani and his ilk, they're telling you that Netanyahu and the Israeli government

want to kill innocent Palestinians, women and children. They want to. Like Putin. Putin does want to kill innocent Ukrainians. He targets for no military purpose houses and small villages in Ukraine. Putin does that. He's a mass murderer. He's a psychopath, and I document that in confronting evil.

Israel is chasing, hunting down Hamas who are hiding behind the civilians. The civilians don't have any choice. What are they going to do? A lot of them have left, and that's what I would have done had I been a Palestinian. I would have just pulled all my family out of there and gone anywhere on earth other than there. But you think that the Israeli war cabinet? How many babies can we kill today? Genocide, apartheid.

There are a number of Arabs as we've documented that live in Israel that make a nice living, living there. I mean, if it were apartheid, it wouldn't be any. So, Mianzami is a foolish man. He's a foolish man. Now, there's a poll taken by Elise Stefaniuk who's going to run for governor against Kathy Hochel in 26. And the poll says that when... Here's a question. When voters learn Hockel endorsed Mandani for New York City Mayor, who would you support, Sophanik or Hockel, to be governor?

Stephanic, 46 percent, Hocal, 45-9. So, Stefanik pulls ahead of Hockel when people learn that Hockel is attached to Mandani. Isn't that interesting? And I believe that'll hold, because Mandani, if he's elected, It's going to do so much damage to this city, and the voters are going to hold Hockel partially responsible for that. Did you hear about this brawl between Congressman Mike Lawler and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffreys, both, of course, from New York, happened yesterday on Capitol Hill, and it was pretty amusing. So let me set the stage. So Jeffreys had just finished a news conference at the nation's capital, telling people he wants to have a compromise on Obamacare subsidies, which is closing down the government because Republicans and the Democrats can't decide on how much money to spend on health care, and that has been a very bitter divide. The problem with Mr. Jeffries is that he wants to give Obamacare subsidies to foreign nationals.

Not all of them, but the republics are going no way. American taxpayers aren't going to pay for the health care of people not born in the USA. It's not going to happen. So Lawler is a conservative, represents the lower Hudson Valley, Rockland, Putnam, A little bit in duchess and Westchester counties. He walks up to Jeffries, and here's what happened. Go. Why did you vote to shut down?

Let me ask you a question. For years, you always lectured about how we need to keep the government open. You're making a show of this to make yourself relevant. It's sad. You could easily sign on to this. You're embarrassing yourself right now. You could sign on to this. The only embarrassment here is you're an embarrassment.

You could sign on to the bill. Let me ask you a question. You have four Democrats on here. Let me ask you a question. Let me ask you a question. Let me ask you for one year. You voted for a tax cut bill that gave the largest tax cut to Americans in history, including, by the way, the average New York are getting a $4,000 tax cut.

Are you against that? You're embarrassing yourself right now. Do you want to cut the standard deduction in half? Is that what you wanted to do? The largest cut to Medicaid in American history, you voted for that. Waste, fraud and abuse, by the way. Tom Donapley, the Democratic controller of New York, pointed out that $1.2 billion were wasted. All right. So, you know, they're back and forth all over the place, and they're never going to agree on anything because these kinds of situations are all partisan.

Democratic Party wants to raise taxes to give entitlements. Health care is under that. Two people. A Republican Party is a self-reliance party that does not want massive government spending, certainly does not want to expand the Medicaid and Medicare rights. roles, which are now leading to the $37 trillion debt the nation has. So you're never going to get agreement, but you can get a compromise, and a compromise should be looked. We'll open up the government, then we'll discuss specifics about how to dole this money out on health care. And if we don't come to an agreement, then the next time around, we'll shut up the down again, I guess, because they're never really going to agree. Now, I come down on the side

of you've got to stop the massive spending. I would raise the age of retirement, 67, and depending on your situation, I wouldn't, it's not 100% across the board, but I would push back Social Security payments and Medicare payments, but you'd get more as you get older because you'd be paying in and things like that. But we're going to have to do something. We can't afford it. And when I say we, it's the United States of America, $37 trillion. And you can't ever pay it back.

We're paying more than $1 trillion of interest a year to people who buy U.S. savings bonds and our investments. And you're going to look at the data and how long can we go with this before the American economy collapses because the U.S. dollar is not going to be trusted any longer. People are going to dump it. You know, most people in the world, they deal with U.S. dollars. I don't know whether you guys know that or know. Who wants a Russian ruble? Nobody. Who wants a Chinese currency?

Nobody. Because those currencies are unstable. so it's either the euro or the dollar and most people go the euro i don't know so they go for the dollar and that can change and if that changes boy are we in trouble so fiscal responsibility and that's what this is all about anyway lawler versus Jeffrey is very partisan we have a lot of Very interesting things to tell you. You're going to be a lot smarter in 10 minutes than you are now. And it's important, and you know this stuff, because John F. Kennedy is revered by Democrats and a lot of Republicans, and he's a lot like Donald Trump.

And I'm going to make that case, particularly on the National Guard stuff. And people don't remember what happened in our recent history. And Trump's doing exactly what JFK did and Dwight Eisenhower. So let me walk through it. I promise this won't be boring. All right, you got back. So on May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court ruled Brown versus Brown, that segregation in public schools is unconstitutional,

which means that every minority, African American, or other minorities, had to be admitted to public schools if they were qualified. If got into the college, then you couldn't deny you on, skin color, and ethnicity. Which was a fair ruling. It should have been done in 1834, not 1954. Okay. Then three years later, President Eisenhower signed the Civil Rights Act of 1957. That focused on voting rights. You couldn't have a poll tax. You couldn't have a quiz before you registered.

You couldn't have any of that. Every American has a title of vote. They're over 18 years old. Now, Eisenhower was pretty mad that there was resistance to this. And then, in Arkansas, a guy named Orville Phalbus, who was the governor, he wouldn't let the black kids in to a high school in Little Rock. Okay? There were nine black kids. They wouldn't let them in.

Governor wouldn't let them in. Governor sent National Guard to the school to deny the kids. Eisenhower did not like that at all. Okay? Now, my mentor, Mike Wallace on CBS, interviewed Forbes. Roll it. Why did you not instead assign a dozen troops to escort each Negro child to and from classes, thereby preventing violence and obeying the order of the court at the same

time. Because the best way to prevent the violence was to remove the cause. You would not have removed the cause by that type of activity. You would have had the eminence of disorder and violence within the school and outside the school. And whether or not it breaks out in the school, it could break out in other sections of the city. He was a racist and he didn't like black people and he was hurting them and Eisenhower said no. And so Eisenhower sent federal troops the 101st Airborne Division, the Little Rock, Arkansas, to stop the madness. Here's Eisenhower. Local authorities have not eliminated that violent opposition. And under the law, I yesterday issued a proclamation calling upon the mob to disperse. This morning, the mob again gathered

in front of the Central High School of Little Rock, obviously for the purpose of again preventing the carrying out of the court's order relating to the admission of Negro children to that school. Whenever normal agencies prove inadequate to the task and it becomes necessary, for the executive branch of the federal government to use its powers and authority to uphold federal courts. The president's responsibility is inescapable. Same thing on immigration law. Same thing.

Illinois, Chicago, sanctuary cities, California, Oregon, on and on, and on and on, won't obey immigration law and are impeding federal agents, ICE agents, from finding people who are here illegally. Same thing, no difference. Now going back, five years after Eisenhower's address, John F. Kennedy is president.

Starts up again, okay, first in Mississippi, man named Jane Meredith gets admitted to Ole Miss. All right. Governor Ross Barnett won't let him go. In, there are riots, deaths, okay? They're almost deaths in Chicago last weekend over the ice agents. Remember that. Okay?

So JFK sends 17,000 federal troops, 70,000 to Mississippi. paratroopers, airborne, to enforce civil rights laws. Then the next year, George Wallace, remember him, governor of Alabama, the other racist. He stands in a doorway. He's blocking the kids from going into the University of Alabama. Kennedy sends more troops down. Here's what JFK said. This afternoon, following a series of threats and defiant statements, the presence of Alabama National Guardsmen was required on the University of Alabama to carry out the final and unequivocal order of the United States District Court of the Northern District of Alabama.

That order called for the admission of two clearly qualified young Alabama residents who happened to have been born Negro. So, I ask you all over the world, what is the difference? You've got two presidents in the 1950s, early 60s. Obviously, southern states, some of them, were not obeying the federal civil rights laws. Thank you. Presidents say, sending them down. to restore order, to prevent violence, and to allow the students to attend the schools, and that was their right.

Flash forward now, 2025. Oh, we're not going to cooperate with immigration law, says Governor Pritzker of Illinois. No, we're not going to do it. and we're not going to, and if an ICE agent is being threatened and may be killed, our cops aren't going to help them. Brandon Johnson, mayor of Chicago, not going to help him. If Trump didn't do anything, and again, Biden didn't do a thing,

because Biden is the architect of the open border. He didn't want federal immigration laws enforced. He's the real villain here, Biden. because he caused all of this. And it's going to cost a trillion dollars to round up all the people that are here illegally and to give them some kind of hearing. Remember, a lot of these people get hearings.

They're not all just booted out, put on a bus and a plane, and sent across the border. But we need a new immigration law. The one we're operating under is 1952. Eisenhower and Kennedy had recent laws that were passed by Congress. So you tell me, is there any difference? Civil rights, immigration. Federal law, federal law.

Not going to cooperate, Mississippi, not going to cooperate Illinois. D.C., Oregon, L.A., Boston, New York. I'm sitting there, I'm going, if you can tell me what the difference is, so the same people who are objecting now to Trump using the military to enforce federal law when the locals won't, they have JFK as a big hero for doing what he did to desegregate education in the South. Kennedy is revered to this day by the Democratic Party. But Kennedy, what he did is okay. It was great. The same thing. So people who live overseas outside the United States, they don't know.

How would they know? It's impossible. But American citizens don't know. They're not taught what happened in the Eisenhower Kennedy administrations. They have no idea about civil rights law. They have no idea that immigration law goes back to 1952, hasn't been upgraded since then. And it should be. We need a brand new immigration law here.

Very specific about who can come, how long they can stay, what the process is for asylum, right there. And then the dreamers, we ought to cut them a break. You're dragged here by your irresponsible parents and you're three, and now you're 30. you're going to get booted back to Paraguay? That's not fair. That's not what we're about here in America. You've got to revise the law. I have to.

But neither party will do it because they use the law to try to whip up their base. Oh, we're so compassionate on the Democratic side. Oh, and on the Republicans, I know, no, no, no, you know. And it's wrong. And my job is just straightened it all out.

And I believe that in the Supreme Court hearing, The Supreme Court will side with Trump on the National Guard. He'll win all the lawsuits against him. They're going to use the memo that I presented on the no-spin news on my television radio broadcasts earlier, signed by Robert Kennedy, the Attorney General, on behalf of his brother, the president. That will be used in the Supreme Court proceeding because I know that the federal government, the Justice Department, was watching when I presented it. I have the document, not a copy.

I have the original. Anyway, we really appreciate you paying attention. I hope that wasn't boring. It's a good history lesson, but history can be exciting. Certainly necessary and relevant. We'll see you soon. Thank you for listening to Looking Out for You. Remember to subscribe to my podcast feed.

Also consider becoming a Bill O'Reilly.com premium member. It will enhance your life. Sign up at Bill O'Reilly.com slash membership. Get access to full episodes of the no-spin news.