Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - No Spin News - Weekend Edition - March 7, 2026

Episode Date: March 7, 2026

Listen to this week's No Spin News interviews. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

In communities across Canada, hourly Amazon employees can grow their skills and their paycheck by enrolling in free skills training programs for in-demand fields. Learn more at aboutamazon.ca. Welcome to the NoSpin News Weekend Edition. So, as we have explained a number of times, in the liberal precincts, and this does not happen in the conservative world, every morning there is a memo that goes out to media, and to certain politicians. And it goes from D.C., K Street, and it gets email. So that's why you hear the same phrases over and over and over again, because this is a suggestive wording.

The first one that went out very quickly on Saturday was Harm's Way. Roll it. I'm just terribly fearful that we may be putting our sons and daughters in uniform in harm's way. Is it worth our sons and daughters going into harm's way and risking their lives and risking injury and killing civilians when the president has not expressed a valid rationale for a war like this?

I am praying for our service members, for our soldiers and sailors and airmen who are now in harm's way. Now, I could give you 50 of those. Same wording, sons and daughters harm's way, sons and daughters harm's way. When you hear this kind of stuff, just know it is organized. All right. The second one that went out shortly after that one was what's next in Iran. Go.

It's boiled down to me to three very simple questions. Why now? Why not? and what's next? You know, the Iranian people are very, very happy for the most part that the Ayatollah has been deposed. They're now looking for, okay, what's next? What is going through your mind right now, and what are your concerns about what's next? It's absurd.

Nobody knows what's next. Okay? This isn't some kind of board game. It drives me nuts. All right. And I have anything else to tell you about Iran. Just that we are on it. So stay close to Bill O'Reilly.com. Anything that happens or if I talk to President Trump or anything like that, it'll be right up there. You know, boom, boom, boom, just like over the weekend. Join us now from Washington is Jonathan Sayah. He is the Iran program analyst at the Foundation for Defense of Democracy.

So number one, I did a lot of bloviating there on my part. I hope I didn't bore you. Did I say anything wrong? No, everything you pointed out was entirely accurate. Of course, the Islamic Republic has always sought to gain sanctions relief so they can try their best to fuel terrorism, and they've gotten that under President Obama. Of course, we saw very weak sanction enforcement under President Biden,

and that's something that's played into their strategy. And if you look at Tehran's attacks in the region, they accelerated definitely under Biden, again, because they were not afraid of consequences. And of course, now they are. So, you know, deterrence is one thing in peace through strength is something that the president has been very vocal about. And we're about to really see the achievements that are going to come from that strategy, of course. I just wanted to point out one other crucial point here. When we talk about putting U.S. personal in harm's way, we have to keep in mind, this is a really. regime that regardless was trying to kill Americans. If you look at any American, whether they were

murdered or if they were injured in Iraq or in Afghanistan, all three running weapons. So this is not somehow some issue that just came out out of the blue. This is something that the regime has been doing for years and actually putting it into it. The difference is that you have an American president ordering military action. So there is a subtle difference. But you know what's a real indicator here. Where's Sean Kerry? He's Biden's top negotiator with Iran who failed dismally to get anything out of those people. He got nothing out of them. They got billions of unfrozen funds. We got zero. The world got zero. Where is Kerry? Okay. He's hiding someplace on Nantuckin, I guess. Who was a disaster? Am I wrong? That was indeed a disastrous deal because Tehran

got everything and we effectively, as you pointed out, got nothing out of it. We got no concessions. They kept their nuclear program. They went beyond that and they were actually enriching uranium in undeclared sites. That's the first step for weaponization. And in return, they got sanctions relief for it and of course they funded October 7th and that's really key. So if you look at every angle, it was a disastrous deal.

And of course, this administration sought to get a better deal. But with this regime in Tehran, it is really challenging because they just just, want to play our diplomats, they want to play the political game here in Washington. So really actually providing them with opportunities, them rejecting it, further legitimize this ongoing military campaign because we exhausted all diplomatic options. Yeah, but they don't have any power now. They don't have anything. So it's just a matter of how much destruction they want to absorb, they being whatever council is left, theocratic council over there. And there are guys left.

that, you know, can make a phone call or whatever, but they don't have anything at all. They're just helpless right now, or am I wrong? You're correct. They do not have a functioning Air Force. They do have two lines of deterrence. One of them is the ballistic missiles that, of course, we've done a great job trying to intercept them.

Israelis also accompanying us, trying to neutralize the missile threat, also going after the launchers, taking out the silos. Of course, we've been really proactive, taking out that number one layer of deterrence. Now, what comes after that is also funds of terrorism. Tehran has been tapping into its proxies, both in the region and, of course, in the West.

We know they have an extensive network in Europe, not as much in America, but again, it's a real threat. So this is not to say these threats are not real, but is more so about saying how this administration has been able to effectively counter them. This was really the only U.S. president that was able to meaningfully take the battlefield into Iran, something that has no one has ever done to actually that's true nobody else wanted this thing

even after 9-11 they didn't want it um and so trump has stepped up um the outcome of course the press is demanding well you know you should know already i don't know do you know you have any clue about how that thing's going to settle out in the next few weeks We have a broad understanding. So we do know Iran's anti-regime movement is inherently anti-Islamist. If you look at university protesters, you look at young people, which Iran is a young population, they're chanting not only against Islamism, but also against leftist values. They see this, the Islam-Marxist alliance is something that has destroyed their country in the past 50 years. So if that's any indication, we know for a fact.

Whatever comes after this regime is not only going to be secular, is also going to be an ally of the United States, comes down to how the opposition is going to lead that. And the Crown Prince, really, son of the Shah, has done an excellent job trying to mobilize the masses against this brutal regime. So all it's really left is, as the President noted, for the Iranian population to wait until the bombing campaign is over,

and then they can go reclaim the country that has been really taken away from them by Islamists in the past half a century. But I don't think it's going to be that easy because you have revolutionary guards still there, arm, they're going to gun them down. And that brings me my last question. When you see the Pope and you see the UN and you see Kamala Harris and you see all of this stuff, there were tens of thousands of people, I guess, there's no legitimate stat that I can cite, but these are the reports that were

murdered in the last month protesting against the Muller's. What kind of information do you have about how many protesters went down. So the numbers we're hearing right now that have been confirmed by a few independent organizations are truly horrifying in the tens of thousands, about 40,000 people. And unfortunately, that makes sense, given that it's a population of 90 million.

They have 10 cities over a million people, and the capital has about 15 million people. And you're talking about a brutal regime that actually imported non-Iranian proxies, terror networks from Iraq and Afghanistan, just to open fire on the masses. But that is, exactly why the average Iranian now see this as a revolutionary movement to them,

there is no way out but through, which is of course really reinforced by the U.S. and Israel military campaign that has decapited the leadership. As you pointed out, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps is a main concern. And the U.S. strikes against them, against their leadership, has fundamentally weakened them. And that is exactly why it is very important for us to ensure that we're going to get defections out of these armed forces. And once really they see that There's no way out but through. We're going to increasingly see them defect, disobey orders, and join the people's movement,

or as the president noted, face certain death. Yeah, I mean, you got a whole of people who kill 40,000 individuals accountable, and that, again, goes into the valley wick of the people that are protesting all this military action. Very good interview, Mr. Seya. We really appreciate your time and expertise.

We hope you come back. You're listening to the NoSpin News, weekend edition. Over to Epstein. Now, the only reason I'm doing this story and I explained this yesterday is that it's such a farce now and it's so obvious why the Democratic Party is pushing this so hard. The Americans need to know what the con is. They need to know that this is a grift what is taking place here and it hurts the country. So as you know, the Clintons, Bill and Hillary, were forced to testify from the House Oversight Committee last week. And here's what I said about it last night on News Nation.

Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. National debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets. And meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver. through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage, gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401K, tax and penalty free.

With billions in precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau, You can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866326-55-7576 or text bill to 998899. Again, that's 866-326-576-5576 or text bill to 998899. At Desjardin, our business is helping yours. We're here to support your business through every stage of growth, from your first pitch to your first acquisition. Whether it's improving cash flow or exploring investment banking solutions, with Desjardin business, it's all under one roof. So join the more than 400,000 Canadian entrepreneurs who already count on us and contact Desjardin today.

We'd love to talk, business. Hillary Clinton never should have been called. And that makes a far set of our federal government to call the woman, whether you like or not, she was Secretary of State First Lady, put her in a position and try to embarrass her over nothing. I'm appalled that that happened. But to call people to try to embarrass them. And it's fairly clear that President Trump did not have anything to do with Epstein after they're. falling out. Even Bill Clinton said that in his sworn statements. And why are we doing this? Why are we doing this? This is a pure, smear Trump action. And it harms the country.

So on Sunday there was a column in the New York Post. I want to quote it a little bit of it for you. It was written by Isaac, Sure. And he said opportunists of all political stripes are using any and every tool at their disposal to make hay out of them with no regard for the victims and their misdirection or the truth. Representatives Thomas Massey and Rokane have become media darlings for their work on the Transparency Act, but their conduct has actually been unbefitting decent men, much less congressmen. The pair claimed to have discovered six men likely incriminated in Epstein's nefarious activities, in unredacted files and Conno went so far as to name them on the house floor, quickly turned out the four had no connection at all to Epstein, unquote.

So this is a witch hunt. This is the French Revolution. This is the guillotine. This is destroying people without evidence. One thing you should know is that President Obama signed an executive order saying that if information would be harmful to the public or individuals, it could be classified by the president and the heads of the departments. Now, that executive order is still in play despite this Transparency Act. And that's why some of the documents in the so-called Epstein files weren't put forward. Because Attorney General Bondi classified them at the direction, I'm sure, President Trump. And joining us now from Rochester, New York, is Isaac Schur.

he's a senior editor at media. So has a tie turning against this witch hunt? This Epstein thing, do you think? I mean, I would like to think so, Bill, but somehow I doubt it. I mean, as long as it is viewed as a weapon against Donald Trump specifically, you're going to see it remain in the news very much so.

And, I mean, look no further. You just referenced it. last week there was this whole controversy over these missing documents in the Epstein files. And it does appear that the Trump administration either deleted or never published them at all. You can, as you said, there might be some legal reason for that. You might question the strategic aim of that because what happened is it blew up and you have all these media outlets so excitedly parroting. this allegation against the president and saying it's credible when it was really anything but. So I have my doubts that it's going to calm down anytime soon, even though it should.

Well, it's pretty shameful that the media is calling for unredacted files that are fantasy. For the pages that you were referring to as some woman who says that she was assaulted by Trump and Epstein. She doesn't know what state she was assaulted in. She doesn't know how she got to that state because she lives in the South. She says, well, I either got there by plane or car. You don't know how you got there. And then the woman herself was arrested on a variety of criminal charges, right? And you want to put out her statement, her accusations?

That's defamation per se and insane, is it not? I mean, it absolutely is. I mean, and there's more where that came from. I mean, there's not even, like, as far as we know, Trump and Epstein hadn't even begun their friendship by this time where this woman is claiming that, you know, Epstein delivered her to Trump to be assaulted. We have no proof that they were even friends at that time. We have no proof that Epstein ever was on Hilton Head Island where she said she'd begun her relationship with Epstein, I believe, in the 19thine. So there's so much to pick a part about that. But what's amazing is all these outlets have taken the fact that there were these missing files, and they started calling the accusation credible without including any of this information. And they never explained the classified nature of almost every government agency that has stuff that is unverified. They're not going to release to the public. And that's the moral thing to do.

thing to do. You don't destroy people, all right, with unfounded allegations. I mean, that's what I fear in this country, and I've seen this now over a 10-year period, is due process doesn't matter anymore. The press has destroyed due process in America. You're not innocent until proven guilty. You're guilty if the press wants to put you in a headline. I mean, that's absolutely true. And I mean, Trump has been one of the main targets of theirs, but I mean, there's been others. You know, there have been anti-Israel obsessives who have used, you know, Epstein's relationship with Ehud Barak, who was formerly the Prime Minister of Israel, actually a political rival of Benjamin Netanyahu, but, you know,

they've been insisting because they were friends that Epstein was actually a Mossad agent. You already talked about Massey and Kana, who are just using, the speech and debate clause on the House floor to smear people. But their immediate darlings is they close Trump. The irony is that there's just so many examples. The left condemns Joseph McCarthy in the 50s for labeling everybody at communists without the evidence. Oh, that was horrible, but now we can do it.

Last question. When you see a poll at CNN just put out, and most of the people in the polls say, no, we don't want the Iranian government overthrown. There's only one explanation in my mind, and that's stupidity for that kind of an opinion. Is there, am I missing something? You know, I agree. I think there are principled reasons to oppose the administration's actions.

I personally support them, but I can understand, you know, principled reasons. We're concerned about the domino effect. We don't know. But to say that you don't want this regime to fall, I mean, I think, you know, you know, you know, stupidity is one way to describe it. I mean, I also think there are a lot of people, unfortunately, in this country who share kind of this anti-American instinct and who are kind of prone to make heroes out of some of the worst regimes on Earth, some of the worst people on Earth, because they oppose America. I mean, I think we've seen plenty of that over the last few years ever since October 7th. There's people out on the streets on Ivy League campuses.

their disdain for Israel is oftentimes just a laundered anti-Americanism. I think there's a strain of anti-Semitism in that poll, but not a lot. I just think it's ignorance. So Isaac, thanks very much. We appreciate the good work you're doing, and I hope we can talk again soon. This is the NoSpin News Weekend Edition. So you'll remember that 62 people have been arrested and charged they've been convicted, 62 convicted, mostly Somalis, okay, for stealing $9 billion in federal money.

The New York Post has been delivering impactful headlines for over two centuries, and every weekday morning I'll bring them straight to you. I'm Caitlin Becker, host of the New York Postcast. From Washington to Wall Street, if it matters to you, you'll hear it here. And it wouldn't be the Post without the stories other outlets like to ignore. So ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast. Listen and subscribe on Apple Podcast. Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Well, how the hell could that happen? $9 billion is a lot of money. So the committee called the governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, and the Attorney General Keith Ellison to testify, joining us now from Washington is Congressman Pat Fallon from Texas, who is a member of the Oversight Committee. So what's the headline, Congressman? that you heard today. Well, Bell, they weren't, you know, they didn't want to take responsibility and they

wanted to deflect, as I suspect that they would. And the Democrats on the Oversight Committee just wanted to talk about Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, they didn't want to talk about the issue at hand, which is there were largely in the small community billions of dollars that were stolen from the American taxpayer. And I want to give you an example with specificity bill for your listeners and viewers. There was something called the early intensive development and behavioral intervention. It was for kids with autism. And Medicaid billed out in 2018, $671,000 in Minnesota.

Six years later, they billed out $342 million. $500X. Now you can't tell me that suddenly there was an explosion of autism in the state of Minnesota. Clearly it was fraudulent. And these are the kinds of examples where, you know, $300 million here, $200 million here, bill, suddenly you've got billions. Okay. So it's federal money that is involved, which is why you're involved, and the feds made the case.

Wals had to know that there were problems in Minneapolis with the Somalis defrauding the federal government. Would that be a fair statement? He had to know that. He had to know that. And in fact, we don't have to just go based on, you know, assertions or speculation. we have, Bill, when we do an investigation in the Oversight Committee, we're lucky if we get one or two whistleblowers because it's difficult for them. They face, you know, punishment and ostracized and all that.

There are 30 people that work in Minnesota in his administration that have been working with us on the Oversight Committee. That is an astonishing number. That's how bad it was. Everybody knew it was going on, and the Walsh administration looked the other way because they wanted those 30 or 40,000 block Somali votes. Okay. So it was politics. Now, Governor Walls, did he admit any kind of incompetence here? I know he didn't admit any wrongdoing, but how about saying, gee, I wish I had done a better job. Did he do that?

No, he said he was, you know, he was educated. He was, he wasn't being straight in simply saying, this happened on my watch. I'm going to take responsibility. I want to fix it. This is exceptionally bad. This is epic fraud. It's historic. Instead, he was trying to just obfuscate. And that's just not going to, it's not going to pass the smell test here. What was his main excuse for not taking action to stop those who were alerting the FBI was going on? Well, he said that they did, you know, prosecute some folks. And as you mentioned, there were 98 people that have been charged thus far. And 85 of them happen to have been of Somali descent.

And there's been 62 convictions. So he's pointing to that and saying, see, we've convicted. and people, but it's like, it's like, governor, this shouldn't have happened in the first place. This is after the fact, and the only reason why you were really taking this seriously is because of the whistleblowers and because of journalists like Nick Shirley that exposed it. So they're not sad it happened, Bill. They're just sad they got caught. And the Attorney General, Ellison, did he have the same thing going on where we were on it? Because in order to accumulate a $9 billion theft, that takes a way.

while. That's not just two months. That's years and years and years of stealing money from the federal government. They've got Allison on tape conspiring with these folks because at the end of the day, this is one of the things I told Waltz. I said, well, there's one of two possibilities here. This is either you are in on it or you're too stupid to catch it. There's just no other. It's epic incompetence or it's, you know, historic stupidity. And it's, you know, it's, you know, historic stupidity. Which one is it, Governor? And then he says, hapada, hobata, hobata. He talks like Charlie Brown's teacher.

He doesn't complete his sentences. He doesn't conjugate his verbs because he was caught red-handed and he has no excuse. And Bill, incidentally, I did ask him, you announced that you were running for re-election in September because of all the success you've had. And then three and a half months later, you're out. Why? And then he said, well, I talk to my family, blah, blah, blah. It was because you got caught and you were going to lose the general election. That's how bad this is.

Is Allison just a flunky? You tell you gentlemen? He is smug, he's arrogant. He knows where he, what he represents, the state of Minnesota. They have a perpetual Democratic majority, and he just really doesn't care. All right. Your peers on the committee, you said it was all about, are they blaming Trump for the Somali theft in Minnesota?

Is that what they're trying to do? No, the Democrats didn't talk about the Somali theft in Minnesota. They talked about Donald Trump pardoning. They always, they always denied, deny, counter-accused, deflect. When we talk about the issue with a hand, they say we should be talking about this issue because it's really not a big deal. We should be talking about their agenda. And the fact of the matter is, in 2024, as you know, the American people said, no, we don't want your woke agenda. We want you to actually govern like adults.

So that's why we're still in charge. All right. So no Democrats stepped up to ask any tough questions in a hearing today? No. No, not at all. Okay. All right, Congressman. Thank you very much.

We appreciate it. And we hope we can talk again soon. You're listening to the NoSpin News. Weekend Edition. Anyway, 2020 election. Sorry. So you'll remember that the charges against Donald Trump, 13 criminal charges, Fulton County, that's Atlanta,

Fannie Willis, the DA, still a DA. Fonnie, still a DA. That was all thrown out in November, okay, after Trump won the election. And Fonnie was disqualified. from even investigating the case because she was fooling around with a boyfriend or doing something on tort. Anyway, newly released memos say that this wasn't even just in Georgia. The Biden administration was behind it.

So we want to know all about that. Let's bring in John Solomon, one of the best journalists in the country. He's the CEO of Just the News, which has done its due diligence as it always does, and reviewed the document. So, Solomon, there are four key revelations according to you. Let's run them down. What's the association, Biden, and Fannie? Yeah, it's pretty extraordinary.

First, let's remind everybody what it took to get these documents. We had to sue. We had to play three years of litigation to get these documents. And for a while, Fannie Willis claimed these are all protected by legal privilege, and then she just suddenly capitulated and turned over the documents to us last week. And so this is the way our government often works. They keep their secrets from us, even when the law says we're entitled to have them. But we won, and there are four really key revelations. The first and most important is that Fannie Willis was working directly with the Justice Department,

the Biden Justice Department to coordinate how she would go about creating a second level of jeopardy, a second level of cost, a second level of persecution and prosecution for Donald Trump in 18 of his cohorts. Jack Smith was already planning to indict most of these folks on almost similar charges at the federal level. Fannie Willis' job was to get them and have a second case at the state level that would drain resources, drained attention, drained bandwidth, and drain their reputations. And so the Justice Department's all in on that. Let me, let me stop you now. So this was during the campaign.

Yes, it was. Okay. The indictments come out. Trump versus Harris. The first week of August and Fondney does it two weeks later. Right. So during the campaign, Merrick Garland, the Attorney General, Jack Smith, the independent prosecutor, both working for Joe Biden.

right okay assisted Fannie Willis in trying to get indictments that would influence the election that's right correct that's correct yeah okay that's pretty big second one is 18 million dollars in federal funding what's that yeah so in the middle of this effort to get Fonnie Willis position to bring the state charges to go along with Jack Smith's federal charges double the narrative. The Justice Department literally invites Fannie Willis to apply for a grant, which is supposed to be competitively bid. But the Justice Department actually says, don't worry about the competition. We're going to turn this into sole source here. Guaranteed to get the money. Just send us a request. We'll send you a check.

This is something that James Comer at the House Oversight Committee Chairman's been very concerned about. Same thing with Jim Jordan. They believe that the Justice Department was underwriting the state prosecution. And in this memo, which Fonnie Willis herself, rights to the Justice Department. It basically goes like this. Let me get this straight. You're offering me a grant. You're telling me it's sole source and all I have to do is apply for it. So she kind of echoes back in a CYA memo, what's going on. And we're very lucky to get that $18 million. That's a lot of jack. It is. It's a lot of chunk of change. Yeah, it is. And so there is that that's the second one. The third revelation has to do with the Biden White House.

In the middle of this, Fannie Willis secures an agreement from Joe Biden's White House counsel to waive President Trump's executive privilege. They've privileged that every president's supposed to enjoy that they can get advice from advisors without intrusion. Now, it was already waived at the federal level, but it's very rare in American history for executive privilege to be waived in a state matter. In fact, I can't find an instance where it was waived

in a state matter previously. So this is a real consequence for future presidents. Future presidents are going to deal with what Joe Biden did here, which is basically any state wants your privilege, we'll waive it as well. That's the third big revelation here. And then the fourth big revelation is that the Democrats on Capitol Hill are the other complicit. You've got the Biden White House, the Biden Justice Department, and the congressional Democrats on the J6 committee,

and they're sending evidence even before their investigations over through the Justice Department directly to findy Willis to give her the most resources, the best opposition research, anything she could have to make sure that they go. Is that illegal? for a federal committee or whatever, these J6 committee, is it illegal for them to send what they've learned to a state for a state prosecution? No, they can refer anywhere.

I mean, Congress has broad latitude. I think the legal issue for everybody, and this is what the prosecutor in Miami, who now has inherited this weaponization conspiracy case, as they call it, is looking at, which is when you have four people working together, who all overtly hated Trump. Remember, Fannie Willis specifically ran on the notion

he was going to go get Trump. If their goal was to deprive President Trump of his ability to win the election, if their goal was to, or the consequence of their actions was to deprive him or his followers of certain civil liberties, then, in fact, those actions, which are otherwise legal, could be viewed as an overt act in a criminal conspiracy. So we do know from our reporting

that these matters, these documents that we just got that we just made public have been referred to the Justice Department by members of Congress. They're looking at it, and it is likely to become part of the evaluation of that Miami prosecutor. Is this another example of a conspiracy where the desire to get Trump trampled on civil liberties, civil rights, and due process? Well, it's election interference, in my opinion. That's what it is. They're trying to alter the election, the vote, okay, by assisting a,

a woman who's obviously irresponsible. The whole case is thrown out, and she was disbarred from adjudicating, but she's still the attorney general. That's the kicker on it. Thank you, John. We appreciate it. Let us know if anything else comes in. Just the news.

Check that out. Thank you for listening to the NoSpin News Weekend Edition. To watch the full episodes of the NoSpin News, visit Bill O'Reilly.com and sign up to become a premium or concierge member. That's Bill O'Reilly.com. Sign up and start watching today.