Bill O’Reilly’s No Spin News and Analysis - Supreme Court Abortion Decision Leak, President Biden's Stance, Putin's Problems & California's Exodus

Episode Date: May 4, 2022

Tonight’s rundown: A leaked opinion from Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito says the court is overturning the landmark abortion case, Roe vs. Wade, outraging both liberals and conservatives. What does it all mean? Where does President Biden stand on the leak? Cheryl Chumley of The Washington Times joins Bill. More bad news for the Biden economy as stock and bonds fall at an alarming rate Russia's Vladimir Putin may be dealing with a medical problem Californian's continue to exit the state This Day in History: Japanese War Crimes Trials Final Thought: Killing The Killer/Town Hall Update In Case You Missed It: Read an excerpt from Bill's upcoming book "Killing the Killers" Click here to watch exclusive clips from the History Tour with Donald Trump Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Hey Bill O'Reilly here. Welcome to the No Spin News for Tuesday, May 3rd, 2022. Stand up for your country. So breaking news about Roe v. Wade abortion. Fascinating story. Of course, you're being misled in the extreme about the story and we will not do that here there is hysteria in the air and that is the subject of the talking points memo so i'm going to give you the big picture and then the likely outcome i all right so um the first thing is this story broke at 8 30 eastern time last night and the cable news people who were on a prime time scrambled and of course they had no blank and clue what really happened, but that doesn't stop them. So there's a lot of disinformation, misinformation, whatever you want to do, call it from the jump. So when the story broke,

someone from inside the Supreme Court, most likely in the chambers of the three liberal judges, took a draft, all right, from Samuel Alito, one of the conservative judges, about the abortion case the Supreme Court is hearing right now. So Alito had written a draft, his opinion, okay, on the subject, and we'll get into what the subject was at the moment. So that draft was taken because it's distributed to all nine judges, including Alito, wrote it, obviously, but the other eight. And so we took it and sent it to Politico, which is an online news thing.

And Politico put it right out. Now, that's never happened before. There's never been a leak at that level at the Supreme Court. And it threw everything into chaos because a draft is not a ruling. Okay? It's just the way Alito is seeing it on May 2nd, not the way the final ruling will come down. But it's interesting. There's no doubt about it.

There's no doubt about it. So the first thing is the Supreme Court issues a statement, which I'm going to read to you right now. Quote, Justice to circulate draft opinions internally is a routine and essential part of the court's confidential deliberative work. Although the document described in yesterday's reports is authentic, it does not represent a decision by the court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case, unquote. In addition, the Chief Justice, John Roberts, has ordered an investigation internally and the FBI will investigate externally. about who leaked this draft. Now, do I have confidence that the FBI under President Biden will aggressively investigate this? No, I do not. But I hope I'm wrong. I hope I'm wrong. I'd like to find out who did it. So here's what the case is all about that everybody's talking about.

Nine states have already enacted restrictions on abortions. They are, Arizona, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Dakota, West Virginia, Wyoming. Okay. So these states and Texas is in there, too, don't know how to find it is yet in Texas. They want to limit abortion to a certain time period because the medical science now says if we're going to do following the science, Joe Biden, okay, that the fetal heartbeat can be detected after five weeks. weeks of pregnancy, and the fetus can feel pain at 12 weeks. That's the science, Joe Biden. So, if you destroy a fetus after 12 weeks, that fetus feels pain. And if you say the fetus is not a human being, then how do you explain a heartbeat? Okay, the science. I love that. Don't you

love that? All right. Now, because the nine states have put restrictions on abortion, time restrictions, the Planned Parenthood people, the abortion zealots, sue under the banner of Roe v. Wade, which the Supreme Court ruled, allows abortion in the United States. that ruling was made in 1973. Okay. So, therefore, the Supreme Court has to hear these lawsuits against the nine states that have put restrictions on abortion. That's what this is all about. Everybody understand that now?

It's not about banning abortion. Not about back alleys or hurting women. I mean, I guess you can make an argument that any restriction on abortion. or hurt some women, but I don't know if that's a legal argument. Anyway, so the Supreme Court now has to rule on a big picture whether Roe v. Wade is indeed constitutional. And I believe that five judges sitting on the court now don't think it is. Roberts will probably side with the liberals on that, or a more limited ruling. And we don't know yet what the Supreme Court's going to decide, whether they're going to go after Roe v. Wade and say, you know what, this is illegal.

The Supreme Court made a mistake in 73. Nothing in a Constitution gives the federal government the power to say there can be abortion from Seattle, Washington, to Key West Florida. And there's nothing in the Constitution that allows the government to do that. That would be getting rid of Roe v. Wade and then giving the states, each state, 50 of them, the authority to regulate abortion within its borders. You with me so far? Okay. So the pro-abortion people, of which Joe Biden is one, even though he is a Roman Catholic,

he is pro-abortion. He wants the procedure in America. Okay? I'm glad I'm not Joe Biden because that'll be a tough explanation on Judgment Day if there is a judgment day, if he's a practicing Roman Catholic. A very tough explanation there, just so you know. So Biden immediately comes out on the side of the progressive movement because he is held captive by the far left. And here's what Biden said today. Because one of the issues that this court, many of the members of the court, a number of the members of court, have not acknowledged is that there is a right to privacy in our Constitution.

I strongly believe there is. I think the decision of this law was correct overruling. I think the decision of Groh was correct because there's a right to privacy. Yeah, there's a right to privacy, but not when it infringes on the public good. Now, Joe Biden couldn't understand that. He's not smart enough to understand it. He was told, and he parroted what he was told, right to privacy, is in the Constitution. That's why Roe v. Wade is constitutional.

We do have a right to privacy, but not a blanket right to privacy. So if you are doing something in private that affects the so-called public good, you can't do it. like taking heroin or methamphetamine or fentanyl. If you do that in private, you can still be arrested because the law says that public safety overrides privacy in many areas. And that's just one example. I can give you a hundred. So just because you do something in private doesn't mean you can do it. Now, then you get into the argument of okay.

Okay, there's another force involved here in your privacy, and that is the fetus, such as you, right? That's the argument that a fetus with a heartbeat at five weeks must be protected by law. now the far left doesn't believe that doesn't believe that the fetus is there any rights at all to life that's why it's called the right to life movement fetus doesn't believe the unborn have any rights at all none so if you have a headache 30 minutes before you're supposed to give birth doctor gumanan kill that unborn child because you have a headache and you don't want it as we have here in new york state where i am right now that's the law So I'm just appealing to Americans in a common sense way.

Right to privacy doesn't give you, the American citizen, the right to harm yourself, suicides against the law. I mean, you can't afford it because a person is dead, but it's illegal to commit suicide or encourage suicide. See? But Biden, he doesn't understand any of this. I mean, he's not, again, he's not smart enough to understand it. Never thought about it. All he does is what he's told to do. And that's not an exaggeration.

That's exactly what's happening here in this country. Okay, so what is the likely outcome? The likely outcome is that the Supreme Court will rule 5 to 4 to remove Roe v. Wade. I didn't think that was going to happen, but now I'm looking at the players. and I'm looking at the issues. They want to stop. The Supreme Court wants to stop all of these lawsuits,

and they will never stop if Roe v. Wade is still there. Every time a state tries to limit abortion in any way, there's going to be a lawsuit, and Roe v. Wade is going to be a still. These five, the five conservatives, okay, are going to say, enough. The state should be able to regulate abortion as the state, the people see fit.

That is the likely outcome. That is causing hysteria on the left. Because remember, abortion to the progressive movement is a commandment. You can't be a progressive. You cannot even associate with a progressive unless you are pro-choice. They banish you. This is one of those rules of progressivism that, All abortions are fine.

There should be no limitations at all, ever. Therefore, most Americans couldn't possibly be progressive because they object the polls show to abortions in the third trimester, for example. A majority, overwhelming majority of Americans object to that because it's barbaric, unless, of course, there's extenuating circumstance, and we always know that. So I'm going to play you two soundbites of hysterical reaction last night. Go. In the event that we had a Republican president in 2024, that's where we'd be.

We'd be at a South America-style nationwide abortion ban in America. And we're no longer talking only about the fact that certain states like New York would be able to preserve the right to abortion and other states would have different results, depending on their makeup. We're now also talking about the complete elimination of abortion through federal statute throughout the country. That's not true. See, now, Maddow's a loon.

We all know that. There's no doubt about it. He's a progressive loon. But that guy, you just heard, that guy's name is Apreet Bahara. He was the U.S. attorney for the Southern District in New York, the most powerful law enforcement agent in New York State, up until Trump sacked him.

This guy's a nut, Bahara. Are you kidding me? There's nobody saying, and the Supreme Court wouldn't say it that all 50 states have to ban abortion. It's not even close to being what is in play. Yet Bahara puts it out there because he's not truthful.

He knows what the truth is. I can't believe this guy. You don't know how powerful this guy was. And this is another good thing that Trump did. Trump got him out. Let's face it, the U.S. economy is under stress. national debt rising, trade war, shaking the markets, and meanwhile, China is dumping the dollar and stockpiling gold. That's why I protected my savings with physical gold and silver,

through the only dealer I trust, American Hartford Gold. And you can do this. Get precious metals delivered to your door or place in a tax advantage, gold IRA. They'll even help you roll over your existing IRA or 401k, tax and penalty-free. With billions and precious metals delivered thousands of five-star reviews and an A-plus from the Better Business Bureau, you can trust American Hartford Gold as I do. Please call 866-326-55-7576 or text bill to 99-89-89-again. that's 866, 326-5576, or text bill to 998899. Okay, so let's wrap this up in a way, and I hope I've been clear. If I haven't been clear, Bill at Bill O'Reilly.com, Bill at Bill O'Reilly.com, happy to answer.

Any question about this tomorrow, please email me and tell me what you think. But to wrap it all up, there's going to be a change in the abortion law at the federal level. I think Roe v. Wade is going to be out. Biden says, oh, we're going to have Congress pass a law. That's the matter. See, Joe doesn't even understand this. So you have Congress pass a law, which is not going to happen, by the way, because no Republicans are going to vote for this, that abortion is legal everywhere in the United States, and the Supreme Court can't do anything.

That's against checks and balances. Supreme Court will throw that law out. a second. But Joe doesn't understand that. So Joe goes, oh, we're going to codify it. Go ahead. Supreme Court just knock it out. But does Joe know that? Is he know how the system works? No, he doesn't. This is frightening. It really is. So there'll be a lot of boom, boom, boom. Finally, the political implications will help the Democrats somewhat. You'll get some people on the independent side who would maybe don't like Biden and want that administration out to say, well, abortion is so important to me that I'll go with the Democrats again. I don't think

that's going to be many because everybody's suffering with the economy now, and that's going to be the override in November. Remember, this ruling will be made in June by the Supreme Court. By November, it'll be still around, but is it going to be a big factor in the mid-term? terms? I don't think so. I could be wrong, but that's how I see it. Okay, that is the memo. Now let's bring in our guest, Cheryl Chumley. She is the online opinion editor for the Washington Times. She has a brand new book out, which I'm reading right now. It's very interesting. It's called Lockdown. The Socialist Plan to take away your freedom, and I'm part of that your, so I don't want my freedom take it away. She comes to us from Northern Virginia. So let's do the abortion thing.

I spent 14 minutes on it. Did I leave anything out? or mislead anyone, should I have done better? No, I think, first off, thank you very much for having me. And I do think you hit all the hot points on where this case could lead, where the Supreme Court could lead America. And I just want to mention that I think returning Roe v. Wade to the states to decide is entirely proper and constitutional. That's where abortions should have stayed in the first place.

And what it's going to do is it's going to cause. chaos in those state legislatures because, of course, nobody is going to want to go on record supporting abortion. They're going to have considerations with all their constituents. It's going to throw states into political chaos for a very long time. But we'll finally get people on record going the duly process, the duly legislative process route. And one other quick thing, I think this could actually open the door for gay marriage to be a consideration once again because gay marriage was actually not passed by law, not by Congress. It was also thrown through the court system. So I think there are a whole bunch of ramifications that we're going to be seen from this for a very

long time. I don't think there's any state that would ban gay marriage. I don't think a constituency would support that. But abortion, there are states like Oklahoma, Mississippi, that would ban it. But already, states like New York and California are drawing up laws that say, you come here. And I'm sure some of my tax dollars are going to be used to import women who want to have abortions from states that are restrictive to New York do have those operations. So already that is in play. Now, the hysteria on the left, can you explain to me, Cheryl, because you know this world pretty well, why abortion is a centerpiece of the progressive movement. Why? Well, I think it's because it goes to their idea that women can be men and men can be women

and so forth. And if you cut it down to the basic route, it's a rebellion against God because the left, by and large, has become a secular, humanist, atheist movement. And you can see that in the political world when the Democrat Party tried to remove God from its platform. And you can see it how the issues play out that they try to advocate for. So in the end, what it is, is women, basically, who want to be allowed the same freedoms as men in terms of recreational sex, and they don't want to face the consequences of it.

And it's also another way of tearing down the nuclear family, the traditional American family, where you can get pregnant and you don't have to have the baby, it's just a choice, and there's no consequences for actions. That's what it ultimately comes down to. You know, the progressive move at private self on human rights. That's all we ever hear about from that crew, human rights, human rights, human rights. But when the unborn is the subject, there are no human rights. I guess because the progressive say, well, the unborn aren't human.

Does that stack up when you have a heartbeat after five weeks? I mean, I'm just trying to be fair here, but where's the human rights component from the progressive movement? in the abortion debate. Yeah, that is the singular most powerful argument from the pro-life side. The look at the science, the very same science that the left constantly, at least over the last couple of years, has told all of America to look at. And the science is clear on what the left likes to paint as just a group of cells, just a mass, a blob on a petri dish.

These are actual lives. These are actual babies. and they have heartbeats and limbs, and they may not be able to breathe and live on their own at an early state, but at the very same time, their actual life forms. And I don't think the science can dictate to the left that they're allowed to say that fetuses are nothing

to worry about. They're actual babies. Okay, they'll never accept that. You know that. All right, so your book is Lockdown, The Socialist Plan, and Take Away Your Freedom. How many Socialists, hardcore, we want to get rid of capitalism, want the federal government to control the economy,

and then dole out the money to Americans as the federal government sees fit. What percentage of elected people do you think fall under that banner? Yeah, you know, that's a really good question, and it's a very difficult question to answer because what happens is the left disguises its socialist intent, right? It's socialist slash Marxist slash collectivist. So it's If you look at the political makeup of Congress, you have four self-declared democratic socialists of America. And even they would say they're not socialist. So what you have to do is you have to look at what these people vote for, what they support, what they advocate, what they fight against. And if you look at that, you see the Democrat Party, by and large, is comprised of a large population of card-carrying socialist.

They just don't call themselves that. But it's the people who support the Green New Deal and the Build Back Better program and Medicare for all and free college tuition for all. You have to look at what they support. As far as numbers go, the DSA, I can tell you, just a few years ago had 25,000 members. So they claimed nowadays they are claiming upwards of 90,000. So that's a significant mindset shift in America where people even want to be affiliated with an organization that, one time was an ugly word. Now, DSA is Democratic Socialists of America? Is that what it is? Yes. And they're not a movement. All right. Now, in your book, I'm on the part where

you are posturing that COVID and all the restrictions attached to the pandemic were really part of a bigger picture to deny freedom of. expression. Do I have it right? Yes. Yes, you do. How did you come to that conclusion? Well, without a doubt, the left has politicized and weaponized the pandemic. And the fact that we at this stage in the pandemic, which isn't even a pandemic any longer, are still fighting things like face mask mandates in certain parts of society and social distance and get the vaccine, get the vaccine and the boosters and all the boosters the government tells you to get at this point in time is ridiculous. And when I started watching the government's reaction to the coronavirus way back when

it first came to America and when Donald Trump was president, I even opined in the Washington Times in April of 2020, that's at the very beginning, that the coronavirus would go down in history as the biggest political hoax. And I was vilified for that, but look at where we are now. We have had every individual liberty, every God-given liberty, put in jeopardy or entirely stripped from us. And we've had to cheer as we've had those rights handed back to us, rights that don't belong in the government's hands to give back to us in the first place. And so now we're moving into this post-pandemic phase where if you look outside America's borders at the World Economic Forum, the Great Reset that the left likes to still claim

as a conspiracy, you can see all that woke corporate type rhetoric hitting hard at America and stripping still individuals of their rights, turning the free market on its head, and threatening our Constitution. Okay. Now, two things. The reason that the left embraced all of this government power to tell Americans what to do in response to COVID is they want Americans to get used to being told what to do. Correct?

I agree. Okay. But secondly, if you have a pandemic that's killing literally millions of people all over the world, and that is a danger, the government has a responsibility to step up and try to defeat that pandemic. Would you agree with that? I agree. Okay.

And the way that the government did that through Donald Trump was to develop this vaccine, which doesn't totally protect you from getting the contagion, but mitigates the damage. And then said to Americans, hey, in some cases, we want, we're going to force you to take the vaccine because you're in contact with so many other people. That doesn't seem to be illogical to me. It doesn't seem to be, but here's where I deviate. In America, it's your individual right to either accept or refuse a medical treatment. And the problem I have with government saying that you must take a vaccine, and I detail in the book, it's a lot longer than a sound bite. But if you go back to the big hysteria over the pandemic, Anthony Fauci was out there using computer modeling

to predict X amount of deaths in X amount of time, which is the same type of alarmism we get from the climate change radicals. They use computer modeling and they start predicting this and that in so many years will happen unless government comes in and saves us. I know what the ruse is, but the fact remains, Cheryl, the fact remains that without any restrictions, COVID would have killed far more people in the United States, I believe. I think you believe that too. And when it comes to personal vaccinations or medical, uh, things, if you don't comply, for example, with the measles vaccine, your kid doesn't go to school. So they can't come to your house and jab the kid with the vaccine for measles,

but you can't go to school unless you're vaccinated because they want to keep the measles from spreading. You see? So it seems to be a balance in here. I'll give you the last word. I'm going to have to say I disagree, I mean disrespectfully. Sure. Sure. I like people who disagree with me. I respectfully disagree with what you said about being certain that the vaccines and all the mitigation measures saved lives. That to me seems something that's unprovable. I mean, you can take a best case scenario and you can use your logic and you can take the best scientific advisement and studies and make that case, but I don't happen to agree with that. at this point just let me tell you i am a fact-based guy and i looked at the areas where vaccinations

were high as opposed to how many people contracted COVID as compared to the areas where vaccinations were low and the lower areas had much higher rates of transmission of COVID that's how i for in my opinion. Last word. And I want to remind everybody, the book is Lockdown. It's out today. It's well worth reading. And we always appreciate Cheryl coming on. Last word, Cheryl. Thank you very much for having me. I do have some information and data in my book where it seems to uphold my own point of view that you can't accurately say that lives were saved by all the government's interventions. I'm just going to Vax. Hey, Cheryl, thanks a lot. We'll have you back soon. very interesting discussion I hope everybody enjoyed it okay so I got my

statement my financial statement for April yesterday and I had to be revived I had to have people come in so my whole portfolio dropped a lot and I told you yesterday I'm not panicking I'm gonna hang tough but it was a bigger drop than I thought it was going to be okay that's life in the fact lane. I only have 22, 23% of my portfolio in stocks, but my bond holdings went down big. All of this is because of Joe Biden. Now, I'm trying not to be bitter. I told everybody this was going to happen before the election. People didn't care. 80 million Americans didn't care. Now everyone is suffering. Everyone who is in the capitalistic system, not on the dole,

earning money honestly, we are all suffering. And the Wall Street Journal backs that up today by saying that stocks and bonds are falling in tandem at the fastest pace in decades. That is right on Biden's doorstep. And that's why I believe he's going to be wiped out in November. So the S&P 500 down 13% so far this year. That's a lot. All right. We're four months into the year. The U.S. aggregate bond index is down 10%. So you can see there's no safe haven. Now, people say, well, what do I do? What do I do?

You do nothing. You hold tight. I have stopped losses on my stocks. I think 50% of them have been sold already because I did that. All right. And that's okay. The cash that I have, when things begin to stabilize, and I hope they will, then I'll go back and I'll take a look

at what bargains there are. But my time frame is two years here. I don't know what yours is, but you should have one. In two years, I think I'll be back ahead of where I started when Biden was elected. I knew this was going to happen because, again, he doesn't understand economics. You couldn't understand economics and do what he did to the fossil fuel industry in America. You just couldn't understand. Nobody with an understanding of how economics works would ever do that. He doesn't know. I mean, this is frightening. All right, the only good news is that there are plenty of jobs, and that's what's keeping the United States out of a recession. We may go into one, but people, if you want to work, you can and earn a decent wage. The problem

is that inflation takes that wage away and puts you in debt because inflation is 10%, maybe you'll get a 5% raise. Okay. But according to the Fitch Ratings Report, another economic pinhead outfit, by the end of this August coming, pandemic job losses will be done. So we'll have more jobs than we had when the country shut down under Trump. good news. Okay, border arrests. There's another. Biden doesn't, he's not, I hate to be repetitive. I'm not that kind of guy. He's not smart enough to run this country. And it's not

even close. Okay, so now in April, 200,000, 1, 200,000 arrests at this other border. I mean, 200,000. human beings. Now this is actually down for March in March with 2,200,021. All right, arrested. So it's down 9% in April. I don't know why. But it's still in two months, it's 425,000 foreign nationals arrested at the border. And you know that another 200,000, 400,000 got in. And a lot of these people who have been arrested got in. They just released them. That's incredible. Poll, Trafalgo, a pretty good, pretty good group. Democrat 39, Republican 36, Independent, 25 on immigration. First question, do you believe the Biden administration should close the southern border until a solution is reached?

56% close the border, 34% no. Hispanic voters close the border, 65%. Wow, 28% no. Democrats close the border, 22%, there's the progressives, no 59%. Publicans, 89% close the border, 7% no. Other independent, yes, close the border, 52, no 39. All right. Now, we have a partner for foreign news, the dailychatter.com crew, dailychatter.com. They're our partner. They cover foreign news for us because I can't afford to send my people to Poland. All right. Now, there are five million Ukrainians who have left their country since Putin invaded it. Five million. Three million have gone to Poland. That is more than a population of Warsaw, the capital of Poland.

Now, I applaud Poland. It's a primarily Catholic country. They are doing humanitarian work. It's tremendous. They're saving thousands of lives the polls are. So I thought you'd like to know. If you want the best foreign news, daily chatter.com. The Pope has requested a meeting with Putin.

He says he'll fly to Moscow. He's trying to end this thing. He compares it to Rwanda in 1994 when one million Africans were killed in a conflict there. The Pope is comparing the two. The Pope released a report that says he talked to the patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, Creel, for 40 minutes. Half of that time, Creel read from a sheet of paper. with all the justifications for the war, according to Pope Francis. So Creel is what you call a false prophet.

The Bible is full of them. I feel bad for the Russian Orthodox Catholics, Christians. You're led by a false prophet. Putin, according to a very sketchy report, is undergoing cancer surgery. I don't know. I don't believe much that comes out of Russia. I don't know. They're just out there, but who knows?

Back in the USA, California's population falls again. All right, in the last two years, 2020, 21, 3 million people have left California. Three million. Think something's wrong there? I do believe there is. So, California remains the most populated state, 39 million people there. Texas is second, 29 million. But they're coming in Texas, and they're leaving California, and they're leaving New York, where I am, too.

Stay in the history of May 3rd, 1946, Japanese war criminals went on trial. 28 of them, including Tojo, the big villain in Japan. all right they were charged with a variety of war crimes out of the 28 tried 23 were either executed seven were executed 16 sentenced to life imprisonment tojo was hung and that trial began 76 years ago today all right good mail segment and a final thought about the killing the killers released today. And we had to move the town hall. I want to tell you all about that. We'll be right back. Hey, it's Sean Spicer from the Sean Spicer Show podcast, reminding you to turn into my show every day to get your daily dose inside the world of politics. President Trump and his

team are shaking up Washington like never before, and we're here to cover it from all sides, especially on the topics the mainstream media won't. So if you're a political junkie on a late lunch or getting ready for the drive home, new episodes of the Sean Spicer Show podcast, drop at 2 p.m. East Coast every day. Make sure you tune in. You can find us at Apple Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. Power, politics, and the people behind the headlines. I'm Miranda Devine, New York Post columnist, and the host of the brand new podcast, Podforce One.

Every week, I'll sit down for candid conversations with Washington's most powerful disruptors, lawmakers, newsmakers, and even, the president of the United States. These are the leaders shaping the future of America and the world. Listen to Podforce One with me, Miranda Devine, every week on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcast. You don't want to miss an episode. I just go to the mail on the message board, Lee, concierge member, direct access to me. bill isn't the Biden administration all about propaganda at this point they have ruined the economy they're held bent on maintaining the course even though polling suggests the Democrats are in for

drubbing the administration any sense of self-preservation they would have changed the course by now they don't know what to do none of their programs have worked and they don't know what to do not going to admit a mistake which is you know Dennis shimmel the villages Florida bill with all the damage Biden is doing what would it take for him to pass James Buchanan is the worst president ever. It's not going to pass them. All right. The civil war happened because of James Buchanan.

And that was the worst thing that's ever happened in this country. Gerald Christensen, Anaconda, Montana. But when Congress turns over in November, will the Republicans be able to stop the invasion we are experiencing at the southern border? No. Okay. Not going to be able to force any border policy. Biden will veto any new law.

but they can embarrass Biden a lot, and they could impeach Biden for not enforcing immigration law. Karen Barracks, Whitewater, Colorado. Bill, what can the American people do about the disinformation governance board? Why would you want to do anything? It's, I told you. I guess you didn't see the show last night, Karen. It's nothing. Nothing.

No power. No one takes it seriously. nothing relax Christopher Cretrano Brooklyn New York Bill had been following you since 1996 set the factor

I want to say thank you for your stellar contribution to journalism your hard work and delivering the truth and giving the folks a sense of calm during such precarious times my question what advice would you give Donald Trump in order to reverse the tide of disdain he has created

look I told the president very respectfully that if he did in public what he did at the history shows, the four that we did together, landslide win for him in 2004. Jeff Pollock, Wake Forest, North Carolina. Thank you for saving the day with the No Spin News, O'Reilly. It was the very beginning of 2002 when I said no more media and then I found you. We're glad you're with us, Jeff. Okay? I mean, and we want everybody to spread the word about Bill O'Reilly.com and our news agency. Very important you do that.

Jerry Grown, Libertyville, Illinois. Bill, who's the most interesting person you have ever met? That would be my paternal grandfather, John O'Reilly. He was a hero in the Battle of Muse Argonne, World War I, which was the bloodiest battle ever for American forces. And he was a New York City police officer, my paternal grandfather. Okay, let's get serious about mom and dad on their days,

get the mugs stand up for your country very reasonable give them premium memberships to bill o'reilly dot com get a free book of any book you want including killing the killers that's a win across the board and it's not that expensive save some money where to the day do not be allowed l-o-ut when writing to us back with a final thought in a moment hey i'm katelyn becker the host of the new york postcast and i've got exactly what you need to start your weekdays Every morning, I'll bring you the stories that matter, plus the news people actually talk about, the juicy details in the worlds of politics, business, pop culture, and everything in between. It's what you want from the New York Post wrapped up in one snappy show. Ask your smart speaker to play the NY Postcast podcast.

Listen and subscribe on Amazon Music, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. killing the killers in the market please rocket it on amazon to the top 10 and uh we know you're going to like this book we know it so renew your premium membership become a concierge member upgrade get the free book okay but buy it but get it you'll learn so much and you won't be able to put it down all right also we are going to do the town hall live town hall a week from today May 10th. Instead of the 11th, I have to do something for WABC radio on the 11th that I didn't know about until yesterday. So we're going to switch it to May 10th. It'll be live 9 to 10 Eastern Time, taking your questions, okay? Get them into us. And we're going to do

this. We're going to have fun. We'll answer questions on killing the killers. Anything else you want to know? It'll be a really entertaining hour and informative, all for premium members only on bill o'reilly.com. So please sign up. Thank you for watching tonight. We'll see you tomorrow.