Blank Check with Griffin & David - Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk with J.D. Amato
Episode Date: September 23, 2018Blank it, thank it! J.D. Amato (The President Show) returns, in the last episode of our mini series devoted to the filmography of director Ang Lee, to discuss 2016’s high frame rate Iraq War drama, ...Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk. But what makes this movie so revolutionary? What is the evolution of frame rates in film? Who are the shortest and the tallest actors according to IMDB? Together they examine the history of cameras from film to digital, the BIG3 basketball league and never doing an episode on The Happytime Murders. This episode is sponsored by [Away](https://www.awaytravel.com/check) CODE: CHECK, [Brooklinen](https://www.brooklinen.com/) CODE: CHECK and HowStuffWorks’ [The Soundtrack Show](https://www.soundtrackpodcast.com/). For your very own “I Talked the Walk 2018” merch goto [TeePublic](https://www.teepublic.com/stores/blank-check)! On Thursday, look out for our bonus episode on the Ang Lee directed short film [“Chosen”](https://youtu.be/Z6azAviqGvs) part of the BMW film series The Hire and then next week will begin our new mini series on the films of Nancy Meyers! [David Sims’ Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk review on the Atlantic](https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2016/11/the-unreality-of-billy-lynns-long-halftime-walk/507449/)
Transcript
Discussion (0)
your podcast billy no longer belongs to you. It's America's podcast now.
Steve Martin.
Everyone knows that line.
Ring-ding-ding.
As even more evil, Jerry Jones?
Yeah.
So who is Jerry Jones?
He's the owner of the Dallas Cowboys.
Okay.
He's a sort of hobgoblin-esque figure in the National Football League.
His portrayal, and I have no context for Jerry Jones, obviously, and I'm digging straight
into the deep end.
Right.
His portrayal, uh-huh, always felt like it was kind of Ted Turner inspired.
But is Jerry Jones that type of guy, or is he combining-
No, yeah.
He's doing more of a Ted Turner thing.
That's a good point.
In terms of his actual energy
and everything, right?
Jerry Jones is more
like of a creepy southerner
who's a maniac.
I wish Steve Martin
had grown a mustache for this.
What?
Guys,
I think we're talking the walk 2018.
I think we're talking the walk 2018.
We're here.
Check.
We made it. We're talking the Check. We made it.
We're talking the lock.
Check.
Here's blank.
Let's do the intro, but just the words are all out of order.
Don't actually do that.
Baby.
What were you going to say?
I was going to say this.
I need to start right here.
I've seen a lot of people talking online about how this is a bad movie.
How this is.
Starting with this. Jesus Christ. No, no, no bad movie how this is starting with this no no no
no we are starting with this okay if you're tuning in right now and you're like i don't know if i'm
listening to this episode oh sure you want to hook i'm going to convince you i think they may have
already swiped delete just the site of billy lynn's long halftime walk but maybe this is what
cinema is about we like blank checks not because they are guarantees
yes because they are blank i agree this is a blank check this is beyond a blank check this is i 100
was watching last night and said this is quietly one of the most insane cultural artifacts of all
time and quietly because no one talks about it but we're here talking the walk and 2018
talking the walk 2018 sorry it's one of, David. It's one of the bigger bounces.
It's one of the bigger bounces.
It's quite a bounce.
And that's fine.
But that, we don't, that's okay.
No, JD, it's not okay.
It's okay as long as we talk the walk.
We're going to talk the walk.
We like blank checks because sometimes they don't work out, but they're blank and you go for it.
Hey, JD.
If everything had to be a guarantee, we'd just get Marvel movies
and Star Wars movies. JD, you're right.
Blank it. Blank it. I'm JD
Amato, and I love
movies. I'm Griffin Newman, and I love movies.
I'm David Simms, and I'm eating a Wendy's
spicy chicken sandwich. God, what
a philistine. Ding dong!
Oh, if Wendy's
sponsored the show, that'd be great. Come on,
Wendy's, get aboard.
This, of course, is Blank Check.
It's a podcast about filmographies,
directors who have massive success early on in their career,
and are granted a series of blank checks
to make whatever crazy passion projects they want.
Sometimes those checks clear,
and sometimes they walk very slowly and traumatically, maybe.
In high definition.
Yes.
This is a miniseries on the films of Ang Lee.
It's called Broke Pod Mountcast.
And today we are talking about his most recent film.
Yes, this is our season finale.
Our miniseries finale.
That's true.
Yeah.
Or is it?
Um, um, um.
And it's called Billy Lynn's Halftime Walk uh billy lynn's halftime walk and it's long halftime walk
billy lynn's long halftime walk do you still get caught up every time you say the title because
you want to say billy flynn like chicago as i believe i've mentioned on this podcast i literally
rsvp'd to the screening invitation or i like emailed someone at sony being like it is sony
right yeah so yeah uh like i can't wait to see Billy Flynn's line.
They did not acknowledge my mistake.
It's one of those things.
Razzle dazzle.
This movie's full of razzle dazzle.
I, for a while,
mistakenly kept calling it
Billy Lynn's big halftime walk.
I mean, that is also true.
I had the same thing
with Inside Llewyn Davis.
I think because of
No Country for All,
man, I want to keep calling it
Inside Llewellyn Davis.
I see. You know? It's like Llewellyn Davis. I see.
It's like Llewellyn Moss. When there's another popular character, I mean
no character is more popular than Billy Flynn.
He's on every pizzeria
mural. Pizzeria
mural? Every Hollywood souvenir
store. We've lost the thread immediately.
You know those pizzerias
with classic murals and the icons of
cinema. It's like Frank Sinatra and the Coliseum.
Colby and McCall.
It's the guy who owns the...
It's always like where there's a building.
Yeah, it's the guy who owns the shop
in front of the Leaning Tower of Pizza.
Yes, right.
Next to the Ghostbusters.
And they're crossing the street.
Billy Lynn.
He's got another movie coming out.
It's not like this is Ang Lee's last movie ever.
No, no.
October 4th, 2019, we will cover Gemini Man. That's the point. That's not like this is Ang Lee's last movie ever. No. No. October 4th, 2019
we will cover
Gemini Man.
That's a point.
That's a year from now.
That will be
at that point.
This is where he is
his walk ends
right now.
That's where this
mini series ends.
It is.
We check back in
with our friend Ang.
Yeah.
And that's the beauty
of Ang Lee
is that
he keeps getting
chances
to make interesting things.
Because sometimes they're groundbreaking and may not manifest into a film that people love.
Or that people get cash.
Or that casual viewers take in.
Sometimes he makes these things that are big swings that are Oscar winning films that sweep the nation.
This is true.
You also go, the films of his that have been commercial breakthroughs are the films that
no one could have predicted would be commercial breakthroughs.
A hundred percent.
Like, Brokeback Mountain making $80 million, Crouching Tiger making $120 million, Sense
and Sensibility making $60 million.
Those are insane numbers that sort of broke the expectations for what those types of movies
could do at that time.
All true, except that you're not mentioning the biggest one, which sort of.
It's grossing as hell.
Worldwide, certainly the biggest one.
Right, Life of Pi, which was his last movie.
Where, right, if you said on paper,
like, well, I'm going to make this kind of like
CGI tiger, blue screen, epic based on a weird novel.
With a lot of religious undertones.
A novel that people thought was unfilmable,
that like multiple directors had tried and failed.
And like
they'd be like
well
you know maybe it'll be
an awards player.
And it's like no
smash hit.
Like genuine smash hit.
And that's the most important
piece of context
for this movie
is that
and I'm sure we'll have
covered this in detail
on the Life of Pi episode
but the notion that
post Life of Pi
Ang Lee is now for the first time
seen as one of those filmmakers
who breaks technical
barriers. Because he never was.
He was always a very classical filmmaker.
Even something like Hulk, where he was pushing...
And people shit on it.
He was pushing a lot of stuff at the time.
It's just so weird.
His filmography is so weird.
And to me, I say it's seamus
because once seamus is gone is when he starts running wild right but i think taking woodstock
is the last seamus right correct and i think that's fantastic and i think because i think
there's not that many filmmakers especially directors who have that are able to go not only
am i going to pick interesting content or things that are not the beaten path,
but also I'm going to try to take these technical leaps.
And sometimes they are huge achievements.
I think all the times they're huge achievements.
Sometimes it captures the fascination of the world at large.
Sometimes people have a harder time taking it in.
There's a big three.
But he keeps doing it.
There's a big three,
and Ang Lee became the surprising unlikely fourth.
The big three, I would say,
are Lucas, Cameron, and Jackson are the three guys who have really tried to push it. Right big three, I would say, are Lucas, Cameron, and Jackson.
Are the three guys who have really tried to push it.
Right? Yeah, I guess so.
And created their own technology.
Sure. With their butts.
Come on.
You're the professional film critic?
What the fuck is this?
This is David Sims of the Atlantic over here.
Two directors we've covered on the podcast
I know that you like.
Well, Cameron, I'm cool with, but like,
I mean, Peter Jackson
and Georgie Porgie.
Are you going to try to back up?
No, no, I'm just saying, well, like, Peter Jackson's
you know, his pushing,
he's mostly pushed
in bad directions. You know,
his hobbits, his high frame
rates, all that shit.
I would argue... Oh boy, here we go.
He's going to argue
something else now.
I would argue
you can't push him
in a bad direction.
by the way,
as if you couldn't tell.
J.D. Amato,
friend of the show.
I'm J.D. Amato
and I love movies.
Blanket.
Blanket.
Now high five
two of our three
other people in the room.
And also just to give
some context.
Griffin's just kind of
far away.
David, I think you're in a good mood today.
Yeah, I'm in a good mood.
Not stressed out.
I hit it immediately.
Now I'm stressed out.
We heard a couple marimba bars.
Because last time we recorded, I was in an extremely stressed out mood.
And then I puked.
And then you puked.
Unrelated. I don't think my stress made you puke.
The poutine.
Yeah, poutine. And I know where it was
from now. I think I figured it out.
You figured it out. Yeah. I don't want to rehash
this. That was a nightmare. Have you noticed that
JD was so stressed out.
JD is sitting askew
as part of sort of my
recovery process from that episode.
But I'm in a good mood. I don't know, Griffin,
how are you feeling? I've been
going through some stuff. Your back's hurting. Yeah, I was on steroids for a mood. I don't know, Griffin, how are you feeling? I've been going through some stuff.
Your back's hurting.
Yeah, I was on steroids for a while,
which, you know, my joke is that
they made me really cut and swole,
but then I saw JD the other day,
and he was like, you look really skinny.
I'm the only person that takes steroids
and somehow get more emaciated.
I wouldn't say you look really skinny.
You look like the same size to me.
I feel like I look slightly less healthy than I usually do,
and that's already a low bar.
But I'll say this.
I've seen you look unhealthy before.
You know what I mean?
It happens to you sometimes.
Yes.
To me, it was not danger zone.
It was just like...
You were on the lower end of the space I know you live in.
I carried your backpack for you.
JD carried my backpack.
It's more than that part of it.
So you guys, all right.
Okay, so here, all right.
Let's do this for two cents.
No, no, I'm going to set the scene for the listeners.
We have a lot to discuss.
We're going to talk about Billy Lynn's long halftime walk in this episode.
Which I'm so excited about.
200, 2016 war drama.
David has done, JD has done more research
for this episode
than anyone has ever done
for anything ever.
Correct.
Before then, though,
JD, our good friend,
hung out with both of us
separately...
In the week leading up
to this episode.
In the week leading up
to this episode.
Was that a coincidence
or was that planned?
Did you want that?
I think it was a coincidence.
Well, here's what I think it was.
I think it is a coincidence.
Ours was a coincidence. Because ours was's what I think it was. I think it is a coincidence. Ours was a coincidence.
Because ours was weeks in advance.
We planned our thing a month in advance.
Yeah.
And I thought it would be,
Griffin and I hadn't really touched base
after both of us were dealing with various...
We were both making TV shows,
which no one should ever do.
And we were talking to each other during that process
about how stressed out we were
and overdue for a hangout catch up.
I think I thought it would have been weird to
have our first hangout catch up be
on podcast talking about
Billy Lane. Because we're good friends and that's
there's a lot of stuff that we've both gone through
in terms of wanting to retire
to the Andes Mountains.
You're retiring to this studio my friend.
Griffin hates it when I say that.
Look I can't get by on just a couple high altitude talks.
But we went to see the Happy Time Murders,
which I will say conclusively on this podcast,
we will never do a bonus episode for.
Thank you.
And people calling for that in the subreddit are maniacs.
To be clear, people actually have,
multiple people have asked us for a Happy Time Murders bonus episode.
Its own thread and also coming up in other threads.
Hey, guess what?
When are the guys
going to talk about it? Will never happen.
Now, I want them solved,
to be clear. I don't like the Happy Time
Murders. They're sort of solved, but they don't really make sense.
Here's all that I think needs to be
said about it. I do
not believe it's a blank check film. It's not.
Which is the most depressing thing about it.
That's the thing that sucks about it the most.
Isn't it one of those sort of like things where you're like,
this might have been a blank check at some point,
and now it's just this like mess.
I think it definitely was at some point.
It's not quite a paycheck movie.
It's not quite a blank check.
I was saying I think it's more check than blank.
Yeah, that's what JD said like five times now.
But only once on Mike.
Once on Mike.
I would equate it to he had,
he started handing out blank checks to other people in order to get the movie
made.
He's like,
if I give you one blank check,
then can I,
to get other people involved.
It costs more than Billy Lynn's long halftime walk.
That's insane.
This isn't mumbling the murders 2018.
This is talking the walk 2018.
Mumbling the murders.
All right.
And then JD and I went to a big three basketball final.
The finals.
The championships.
Which depressingly I read got higher TV ratings than any WNBA game ever,
which is like truly depressing.
This big three?
Big three.
So it's Ice Cube.
So who was it?
It was Jordan, V, Ewing, V, Abdul-Jabbar.
Those are the big three.
You're actually not far off.
Really?
Well, Mirzan, V, Al-Ming.
He's a little far off.
V, Manute Ball.
Who are the biggest three basketball players?
Manute Ball is dead, sadly.
Fuck.
Is George Mirzan still alive?
Yes, he is.
I think he is.
Right?
Yeah, yeah.
You're just sort of, now you're naming the famously ridiculously tall basketball players.
No, he's naming basketball players
that are in movies.
Which is why he would know them.
But George Murasan and Manu Bowe
are the two 7'7 guys.
The tallest men who ever played.
For me to take note of an athlete
they had to be abnormally large
and be in talkies.
Yeah.
Here's what the Big 3 is.
Shaq was my favorite movie star for a while.
Big three is a league that
Ice Cube created that is
when NBA... Wait, seriously? Yes.
When NBA players retire,
they can join the big three, which is all
retired players. So we
watched a game where like... Why is it called the big three?
Because it's three on three basketball,
not five on five. So it's played like half
court. It's kind of like streetball.
They're only on one side of the court?
The court is only one side.
So what happens on that other side of the court?
There's more seats.
More seats?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
You're into this.
Wait, so who is in the game?
All right, so we were seeing the championship.
Ice Cube created?
This is a real blank check.
Not only did Ice Cube create it, he opens the game with a concert.
Like Ice Cube comes on to,
there's a stage when you arrive,
right, JD?
Yes.
This is a blank check.
This is him using all his cachet
from his success in different mediums, right?
Yeah, sure.
And we sit down and we're like,
what's with the stage?
And someone in front of us is like,
Ice Cube's going to perform.
And I was like,
well, all right then, Ice Cube.
The sound was terrible.
Well, because here's the thing, It's not a huge budget lead.
It's in the Barclays Center. We were in the Barclays Center.
I was sitting as close as we were sitting
for Tarouk. He kept
I mentioned it.
He kept referencing Tarouk
the final flight or whatever it's called. He'd nudge you and go
that's where the
Yes, he did that.
He literally did that. The Ikron flew down. Yes, he did that. He literally did that.
The Ikron was right there. Pretty much. He actually
did that.
You tired there? No, I'm just
I shouldn't even talk about it. On we?
No, it's just
I'm sorry. I
had like a disappointing career setback
this week. What happened? I lost
the best of online betting category and good housekeeping.
I knew you were really looking forward to that.
I'm sorry.
You didn't get the trophy.
Look, I'll admit, you know, the competition's been pretty light.
No one's really been innovating the space, and I thought I could get this one in a walk.
Because like, you know, sheets, they're always marked up.
You know, most betting is marked up like 300%.
It's a scam.
So, it...
I got some dirty rags.
I wrote my name on them, and I thought it would win.
Griff linens?
Griff linens.
But then here comes Brooklinen.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, here's our strategy.
Let's make a really good product.
Oh, you mean the fastest growing bedding brand in the world with 20,000 five-star reviews?
Brooklinen...
Let's do something that's respected by everyone.
They like using it.
And I'm like, okay, fine.
I guess that's a way to go.
So, yeah, instead of your strategy, which was basically just trying to win by default,
Brooklyn actually makes fancy hotel sheet level sheets for the average consumer.
Right.
I was like, hey, do you want to sleep in a way that feels like you're taking a nap under a bridge during a rainstorm?
And then everyone else is like, no, we'd rather feel like fancy hotel sheets.
You know, we like the idea of a husband and a wife who love each other and love linens and are making this product together rather than just a sad mid-level actor.
And also they have a cool doc called Dukes.
Yeah, and I don't have a friend.
Yeah, they've got this small business approach. It's a husband and wife
team, so they're involved in every step of the
manufacturing process, of the customer
service process. They remember their
customers by name, and they take out
the middlemen, so they keep things personal.
That's why it's so affordable.
And for me, this is also very personal
because they live in the city that never sleeps
New York City and so I feel like
I'm no longer the hometown golden boy
yeah I mean you did not deserve to win
I didn't I have Brooklyn and Sheets they're very
good and then you gave me your sheets
and I had to burn them in the backyard
yeah yeah yeah
and like a ghost came out of them
right and I gave you a promo code and the promo code
ended up costing
you more money right yeah it added a new loan to my yeah right but with brooklinen which i've got
brooklinen sheets you've got brooklinen sheets we're a couple of brooklinen babies i don't want
to admit but i've defected over they're the best most comfortable sheets they really are and we
have an exclusive office offer for blank check listeners.
You can get $20 off
and free shipping.
When you use the promo code check
at brooklinen.com. My shipping
was $200. Brooklyn is so
sure you're going to love the sheets. They offer
a risk-free 60-night satisfaction
guarantee and a lifetime warranty on
all their sheets and comforters.
The only way to get $20 off and free shipping is you use promo code check at brooklinen.com that's b-r-o-o-k-l-i-n-e-n.com
promo code check that's nice too because my my sheets are high risk it's nice to them to
offer a risk-free guarantee that there won't be any oil sheets are high risk yeah hey guys what's
i feel like these wet dirty sheets all over the studio.
Now you know who I sold my remaining supplies to.
Don't put those near an open flame because you'll go up with them.
Damn.
Get some Brooklyn ends.
Promo code check.
Did he show you where Ben sniffed out the fart?
No, but I did look by it and think about it.
I know that our producer Ben was a fart detective that night.
He was a fart detective. He detected a fart. Po was a fart detective that night. He was a fart detective.
He detected a fart.
Poet laureate.
Meat lover.
He was an old person.
And I just could tell by the stank.
That was like an old person fart.
Took him up any wet hat.
We haven't had the names in a while.
Do the names.
Wish him a hello fennel.
Sure.
Yeah.
Hello fennel.
He's not Professor Crispy.
No.
He is a fuckmaster.
Well,
let's not go there.
He's graduated certain titles
over the course of different
miniseries such as
Kylo Ben,
Bruce or Ben Kenobi,
Ben Night Shyamalan,
Ben Say Benny Thing,
dot, dot, dot,
Ailey Ben's with a dollar sign,
Warahaz,
Purdue or Bane,
Ben 19,
The Fennel Maker
Benglish
Sure
Mr. Bencredible
Robohaz
Robohaz right
And now
Do you have an English one?
Yeah
Oh you do
I've been seeing what people
have been suggesting
Yeah and there's a
I saw one that I really liked
I'm curious if you chose it
Eat Drink Ben Hosler
That's the one that I saw
that I loved
Fair enough I remember there being one other that I saw that I loved. Fair enough.
I remember there being one other that I liked,
but I can't remember what it was.
It doesn't matter.
All right, so who did you see at the big three, guys? All right, so the big three.
Well, we saw Ice Cube, LL Cool J as well.
Is he financially involved, or was he just there to hang out?
I don't know.
At one point—
He bought a ticket.
I mean, he was financially involved in that, so that's true.
Can I just paint the picture?
I think he was just hanging out.
Also, I pointed out there,
LL Cool J is an interesting person.
He's been in both Deep Lucy and Toys.
Yeah.
Two of your faves?
Yeah, this guy's in good movies.
Toys, which if we ever did a JD's choice where you could pick any movie you wanted,
it would be Toys.
Yes.
There was one point at which Ice Cube was performing.
We couldn't really hear him
because the acoustics were horrible.
Because it was set up for basketball,
not for an Ice Cube concert.
And performing in the round in Barclays without proper sound design.
Not going to go well.
And LL Cool J has walked to the stage.
He's right there.
No one else is doing this.
He has two cell phones, one in each hand.
And he's filming Ice Cube with both cell phones.
Is it like a Sonic and Knuckles thing? If you put them together, it's better is it like a Sonic and Knuckles thing where
if you put them together, it's better?
Sonic and Knuckles thing.
Imagine if you're holding two phones
next to each other and filming something.
You would just get the same video twice.
He's doing a story on Snap.
He's doing a story on Insta.
That is very possible.
I bet that's what he was doing. O'Shea Jackson Jr.
was also there. Oh, he's good.
He is.
I know we have like four and a half hours of Lintop.
He got dafted up by Amari Sotomayor.
And I don't want to keep on sidebarring here.
But just because this is one of our,
we're now in the zone again of doing episodes
within a month of their release.
Yeah.
Rob Letterman, director of Detective Pikachu,
upcoming episode on this show.
It's essential. David's most anticipated movie of all time of Detective Pikachu upcoming episode on this show. It's essential.
David's most anticipated movie of all time,
Detective Pikachu.
Yeah.
I love detective movies.
I love Pikachu.
Yes.
I have to see this movie.
I'm hoping Detective Pikachu
is what Happy Time Murder should have been.
Just a hard-boiled noir.
Pretty sure it will be.
A bare-knuckle noir.
But he, in an interview, said
that the Pokemon
are going to be photorealistic. They're making
them look like actual animals. Oh my god.
Pokemon are not real animals.
They're fake. But it sounds like the design
aesthetic for this movie is to make them look
like real animals existing in our world.
So my question now, moving laterally
because of the thing you just said, because I've been
debating this as well, is that the approach
they're going to take with the fucking Sonic the Hedgehog movie?
Maybe.
Just a weird Sonic that has stubble and wrinkles.
But is Sonic the Hedgehog going to be like
Knuckles and Tails and Sonic
all looking like roadside creatures?
Or is it going to be like the Smurfs
where it's just like,
what the fuck is this thing?
This doesn't exist in our universe.
I don't know.
Hopefully it's like the Polar Express.
I mean, Sonic doesn't look like a hedgehog.
Sonic is a creature, and then he has some sort of cool spikes,
and that's like him.
But he doesn't look like a hedgehog.
He's the wrong color for a hedgehog.
But the premise of the movie is James Marsden plays a traffic cop,
like a roadside speeding cop.
That's the premise of Sonic the Hedgehog?
That's not the premise, but the human step is that's how he meets
Sonic. So you have to imagine in a
real world environment, he's
there with his speeding gun, and this
blue thing flashes by, and I wonder, is it
just going to be a CGI creature with red sneakers
and the cool hair,
or are they going to make a photorealistic
blue hedgehog who's like, hey man!
Jesus Christ. My pitch, if you make a photorealistic blue hedgehog who's like, hey, man. Jesus Christ.
My pitch, if you make a movie based on a video game, John Leguizamo must be the star of it.
I mean, he'd be a great Sonic.
No, it's Ben Schwartz.
He would have been a great Sonic.
I mean, Jim Carrey is playing Dr. Robotnik.
I'm playing Knuckles.
I should mention that.
I buried the lead a little.
I'm playing Knuckles.
Ben's playing Tails.
Tails is my favorite. JD's playing Big the Cat. I'm playing...uckles. I should mention that. I buried the lead a little. I'm playing Knuckles. Ben's playing Tails. JD's playing Big the Cat.
I'm playing...
Dr. Robotnik.
No, Jim Carrey is playing Dr. Robotnik.
Which, I mean...
I'm playing the owner of the
Casino Night Zone.
Do you think that Jim Broadbent's
agent has just been banging his head
against the wall for six straight weeks on the fact they missed Robotnik?
But do you think Broadbent was like, oh, no, like, I won't.
Robotnik, I wish I could do him now.
Robotnik.
But that even sounds like Dr. Robotnik.
Like, that's how I imagine Dr. Robotnik should talk.
What's his deal?
He wants to turn the animals into robots?
He's the Eggman.
This is David's observational stand-up comedy. doctor he wants to turn the animals into robots that's his thing man this is this is
observational stand-up comedy what's the deal with dr robotnik
can he walk or does he have to be in a spaceship it's not clear it's so weird
what's he have against these animals video games are so weird now they try and like have them you
know make sense.
There's a little more thought into it.
Mario, it's just like,
oh, the dinosaur kidnapped a lady.
Why?
He kidnapped her.
Why'd he do it?
He just did.
What if they announced it?
He's a doctor.
He makes robots.
And the hedgehog doesn't like him.
No, doesn't like him at all. Well, so much of game like quote-unquote plot lines were dictated by like okay so what can we do in
technology right right could we actually visually render right right like the designs right came
first um what if indiana jones is our billy lynn podcast no no come on come on you're right let's
talk the walk let's's talk the walk.
Well, I just want to tell you that we saw the power win the big three championship. Who's the power?
That's the name of the team.
Now, here's the weirdest part.
Oh, we got, well, Big Baby Davis is sort of their star.
Birdman.
Gladys.
These are kind of like NBA veterans, like not quite stars.
That's not true.
One of these won best picture. One of these won best picture.
One of these won best picture?
Yeah, Birdman.
That's true, Birdman.
Yeah, Chris Anderson.
Yeah, he won best picture.
If he had won best picture, I'd have been happier with that choice.
But the real game of the night, I don't know.
Blankies right now are screaming because I'm going to get into the most.
The final was a little boring.
I'm going to get into the most film nerd thing you've ever had in this podcast.
Yeah, he's going to do it.
So let us revel in the big three for just a moment.
Yeah.
The game of the night, though.
Who's the third guy on the team?
On power?
Yeah.
I don't even know.
Yeah.
Well, you know, they have six guys per team.
Quentin Richardson, that was the third big guy.
Was it Gattino Mobley?
Gattino Mobley was on that team.
Corey Maggette.
Right.
Corey Maggette.
Never been heard of these guys.
Not the biggest basket nut in the world.
Are you?
Yeah.
You're such a basket nut.
The weirdest part is that their opponent was called Three's Company.
Most of the teams have a three pun in their name.
Because Tommy Suzanne Summers was on the team.
And their logo.
Norman Fell.
They're called Three's Company.
Their logo is a factory. I don't know Company. Their logo is a factory?
I don't know why.
It's a company?
It should have been corporate offices more, right?
But it's so weird.
Yeah, okay.
Who's on the team?
But the game of the night.
You're not going to know anyone on Three's Company.
What, none of them were in Space Show?
I'm trying to think.
This is disgusting.
I know all 10 basketball players
who have been in movies since 1991.
Nate Robinson was there
at the big three game.
What was Nate Robinson's book?
He's in Uncle Drew.
He plays the guy in the wheelchair.
Oh, also,
well, wait a minute.
I was going to say,
what?
What's Laura Dern?
Oh, Baron Davis.
Baron Davis. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Is this who Laura Dern's dating, Baron Davis. Baron Davis.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Is this who Laura Dern is?
Yeah.
Oh, baby.
But anyways,
the game of the night
was the battle for third place.
Right, the third place playoff
between the three-headed monsters
and Tri-State.
Tri-State.
It really just felt
in the reach of being like,
what's another three thing?
Tri-State?
Okay.
Okay.
But it was so much fun
and the game winning shot
was had by
Mahmoud Abdul Raouf
who was previously
known as Chris Jackson
NBA
he is currently
50 years old
and is still lighting
guys up
it was so much fun
yes
it was awesome
he has
gray hair
it is crazy
it was cool
JD and I hung out
we saw the big three
championship
we saw Ice Cube perform
yeah
we saw Happy Time Murders which was really good in terms of like breathing exercises It was cool. JD and I hung out. We saw the Big 3 Championship. We saw Ice Cube perform.
We saw Happy Time Murders,
which was really good in terms of breathing exercises
because we were sighing constantly.
Our oxygen intake
was very regulated
throughout the movie.
It was very much like
David and I,
our friendship,
we'd go and see a Big 3 game
or try to be players.
Our friendship is
we'd go and see
Happy Time Murders.
Yeah, that's fair.
I think our friendship is also that we go and see Happy Time Murders. Yeah, that's fair. I think our
friendship is also that we'd go see Happy
Time Murders, but we'd probably go
see something else. Yeah, but I'll say,
there is, and it's not exclusively, but
the majority of movies that you and I have seen
together are movies where it's like,
we need to see this together so that we can have the very
specific, incredibly long discussion
afterwards. Yeah, monogamina. Right.
And Billy Lynn falls into this. Yes.
Where we were overdue to hang out and see a movie
and I said, do you want to see Billy Lynn's long halftime
walk? And you said, I don't know what that is. Tell me what
it is. And I told you about the technology
and you were like, that sounds weird. And I was like,
yeah, Ang Lee. And you were like, wait, Ang Lee directed
this? Which speaks to how
much this movie was kind of like ignored
and shrugged off. 100%. And I
said to you, he's broken all these technological barriers.
The movie's gotten trashed.
They only set up five screens, like not even five theaters,
but there were five screens in the entire planet
that were capable of projecting the movie in the way he intended.
And at the point that I suggested we go see it, it was down to two.
Yes, and it was...
It was now the only screen in North America
that was playing.
There was only ever one screen.
Oh no there were two.
LA was playing it for a week.
Because the Arclight Hollywood
and AMC Lincoln Square
could handle it.
Which is where we saw it.
And on a smaller screen
at the Lincoln Square.
And there were also
Well you can't do this
on a big screen.
Yeah.
In fact they have to get rid
of the first like five rows
of the theater
because the technology
doesn't work.
Yeah.
I'm going to get so into it.
What were you going to say? Also screens in taipei bang baijing and
shanghai yes are the five places on earth it only played in two continents projected in uh 120 frames
per second yes yes and i know that i'm going to sound like um a one trick pony with what i
appreciate in films but something that i want to set the stage for what I think
is amazing about this film is
we sat down in that theater.
It was half
full maybe. Yeah, we saw like a late
like a Sunday night 10pm showing
or something weird like that. But still, there wasn't
many people in it. Yeah. The moment
the first shot of this movie came
on screen. Yeah.
The reaction of the audience was...
JD explains a theater reaction.
But this is what it's about.
Okay, it was what?
Shot comes on.
Yeah.
People have reactions like, oof.
And then there's giggles.
Yeah.
Oh, no.
And light applause.
Yeah.
Okay.
Because people are like,
what am I experiencing with my eyes right now?
What's the first shot of the movie to you? First shot to him reaching to grab his cell phone from his nightstand table?
It's a nightstand.
Which is like 3D 120 frames per second was the most aggressive thing we'd ever seen.
Like it felt like having your personal space violated.
I'll say this to the makeup.
JD literally has four pages of typed notes stapled together with also handwritten addendums on it.
So there's one quote that I want to start with
from a Sony released this like 40 page PDF.
I just want to say this one thing
before you get to the quote.
Because the other thing I found interesting
about the Makeup Hour Theater,
we saw it in,
and David, you saw it at the New York Film Festival.
I saw it at the New York Film Festival.
It opened the New York Film Festival.
I saw it at a press screening,
not at like the premiere.
Right. Attempting to project it in the perfect format and it was a little bit off. You still saw it at the New York Film Festival. It opened the New York Film Festival. I saw it at a press screening, not at the premiere. Right.
Attempting to project it in the perfect format, and it was a little bit off.
You still saw it more closer to his vision.
It certainly looked crazy to me, yeah.
But it is this insane thing, as we're talking about this movie,
is very few people in the world got to ever see it the way he intended,
and on home video, it will never be replicated in the same way.
No.
It was released a month later, and i saw it again at the
sony screening room in 2d regular because i remember you saw him where it told me like it's
not very good and i said is there any chance the technology's so distracting that you didn't
realize the movie was great because i so badly wanted this right right right well you were all
in on the vin diesel of it all and the steve martin of it all. If you go like Griffin, pick your three actors you want to be
rehabilitated by Ang Lee.
Reclaimed as serious
character actors. It was Steve Martin,
Vin Diesel, and I even felt Kristen Stewart's
reputation was less
sterling than it is now.
She was at the beginning of her sort of reclamation
project. But I was
amped by it. I thought it was a great story
for a movie. i got excited when
i read the synopsis and all of that um but the theater we saw it in i think the makeup seemed
to be you know half full half like chinese college students yes which you realize like oh he really
is sort of an important important cultural figure yeah as just like the most prominent, you know, Asian American artist
in this medium at the very least.
This movie made almost all of its money in China.
Right, right.
So it was a lot of like native Chinese speaking
college students or 20 somethings.
And then the other half of the theater
was like people who worked in film.
Like I recognized a lot of people like,
oh, wasn't that guy like a sound guy
on like a college humor shoot I did five years ago?
Packed together people who were just talking
about on-set experiences.
Because I was eavesdropping,
and the whole makeup was just
Chinese college students who were like,
this guy's important, we have to support him,
and film crew people who were like,
I need to see what the fuck this is.
Just to break it down, this movie made
$23.7 million in China,
$3.2 million in Taiwan and $1.7 million in the United States.
And was released wide here.
It was.
Not super wide, but wide.
$40 million project.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And that's the other thing is that after I saw it, I think I went on a tirade of just
any person that was a film fanatic.
Yes.
I was like.
Check it out.
You have to just go
you made at least
10 people go see it
because people would
come back to me
and be like
so JD made me
see Billy Lynn
will anyone ever
see it in that again
I have
because it's such
an ignored movie
like I guess
maybe one day
but like who's
going to go to
the fucking effort
of setting up
the projection
that's the thing
because you even go
like okay let's say
like the museum
a moving image.
Right, but they can't do it.
Maybe one day they'll be able to,
I don't know, you know.
But it's literally like
you would convert your entire theater
for one movie.
Right.
It's not worth the conversion cost.
Right.
Yeah, so I believe,
so here's what the context
of all the stuff
that I want to talk about is,
is that this film uses technology.
So basically,
I don't think we've said it yet.
It's 120 frames per second.
Correct.
4K stereoscopic.
So it's 3D.
Right.
Okay.
Films are usually shot in 24 frames per second.
I'm going to get all into it.
I know you are.
But like,
here's the pitch that I always say.
I'm sure people mostly know that.
24 is what people are used to.
Peter Jackson released the first Hobbit in 48, and people went, fuck this too much.
That's what I always say.
I go, when he released the Hobbit in 48 frames, people were like, this is crazy.
This is 120 frames.
Ang Lee went 2.5 times more than what Peter Jackson had done, which was two times more
than what we were used to, and people hated that.
And he did it for a movie that's mostly just set in the bleachers at a stadium
a drama about a traumatized guy who's introverted
no
Ben's been going through his own
halftime walk
yes
we're not even at halftime yet
here's what I want to say though
I think it's okay to not watch this movie
unless you're able to see it in 120 frames
per second 4k 3d.
Now,
what if you can watch like the 4k disc?
I think no.
Okay.
Wow.
I think no.
I,
I got the combo pack,
which is,
I got the combo back.
I paid like $20 for this.
I got it on.
I know what I got on sale.
I've been,
I've been watching the prices.
I've been writing the prices for months.
I was hoping it would be on writing the,
cause I was,
it's, that's one of those things
where Amazon's like,
you want that?
You're going to have to pay.
Like, no one wants that.
You know what I mean?
It's not like...
Amazon did a sale where it was like,
if you bought three 4K UHD movies,
they were each like $15.
Still a lot, though.
Yeah, but I got Furious 7 and King Kong.
King Kong?
I love King Kong, baby. The Jackson King Kong?son yeah get ready for that app yeah that's gonna be
a good app yeah that's gonna be a good app maybe i'll turn around which isn't me saying that we
have this on the books no but like whenever we do it constantly pushing whenever we do it no no i
mean to me that watch out for the hobbit uh the third hobbit app because that's when david's gonna
i'm locked and loaded for that one baby that movie's good yeah good. Yeah. See, this is why we got to do Jackson
because it's a combination of every type of
miniseries we've done so far. It goes into the chaos
of the Star Wars. We'll do him one day.
As a personality, he's...
He will be your Matrix Reloaded. My problem with him
is, it's not that good, but yeah.
As a personality, Jackson's not that
interesting. He's like a sort of an avuncular guy.
You know what I mean? Sure,
but I mean, his career starts out with
what is clearly now the first best
puppet fucking movie of all time.
Definitively.
I grew up in the horror movie
section of my local video store
Video Adventure and boy oh boy
did we love Peter Jackson
back in the day before he was the Peter Jackson
of now.
He was known for making the
I mean
The weirdest
most transgressive
Dead Alive
is the
goriest
most violent film
of all time.
Quite funny though.
I mean
hilarious and bizarre
and when you're
you know
12
and you want to have
jaw dropping
insane
gore
it's interesting.
I don't think I could
sit through it now
just as an adult
but boy oh boy
is that movie wild.
Just to say this, though,
because presuming that Blinkies have watched this movie
in preparation for this episode,
the ways it is available to watch now
are on this comic pack, 4K, UHD, 60 frames per second.
So you're still only getting half of what you saw in theater,
but it's closer to the experience
of what the high frame rate looks like.
It looks weird. That's 2D.
Then there is a normal frame rate
1080p 3D Blu-ray.
Which is what you watch, right? Which is what I watched
in preparation for this, and then there is
just the standard
high def 2K 24 frames
per second, which if you're watching it on any streaming
platform, if you're buying it, if you're renting it,
that's probably what you're seeing.
There's the Ben experience. It might be setting you up if it're buying it, if you're renting it, that's probably what you're seeing. Okay, so I have a question.
There's the Ben experience.
It might be setting you up.
Yes.
It might be the best way to watch this.
It's too soon, but I don't know what anything you just said.
Oh, boy, oh, boy.
Am I going to get into it?
I have no idea what any of that is.
So here's what's going to happen.
You just invited a vampire inside your home.
Here we go.
I'm so jazzed. Here what here's what's gonna happen
god i love talking about movies so much like this stuff gets me so jazzed blanket thank it
um i i want to talk about how cameras work and i want to explain the brass tacks of it because there's a
lot of people like myself, even, even coming through film school where you understand the
ideas of it, but there are certain words and phrases that are thrown around and you sort of
feel embarrassed to admit you don't know what they are. And sometimes when you look that stuff up,
it's sort of circular because it all leans on each other. So what I want to do is I want to
explain how cameras work. And I want you guys to sort of be the audience surrogates
to keep me to making it understandable.
You're saying it's the thing where you know how to use a word,
but you don't know how to define it?
Yes, or it's the kind of thing that there might be one word that you don't know.
And I might be saying this, and people listening will be like,
I know all of this, but just let's refresh ourselves,
because when we get into the technology of it,
what they did was so advanced
that you need to have this base knowledge
to really understand it.
And I promise there's no aspect of this
that's just like,
I just want to ramble with this stuff.
I think this is legitimately important.
Talk about it.
So first I want to start with,
so Sony released this 40-page PDF,
which is fascinating to read,
about the making of Billy Lynn.
There's two amazing quotes in the whole thing
because Ang Lee
and John Toll, John Toll's
cinematographer that did this, from the get
go. One of the best living cinematographers.
Famous Oscar winning
two time, back to back actually
Oscar winning. What did he win for Braveheart?
Braveheart is the second.
And what was the first one? Legends of the Fall.
A gorgeous movie. Not a good movie but
a gorgeous movie. Shot with Thin Red Lime which is one of the most beautiful looking movies of all time.
Shot with Thin Red Line, which is an incredible looking movie.
Shot Tropic Thunder because Ben Stiller wanted Tropic Thunder to look like Thin Red Line.
He has a weird career because it's that, yeah, it's Tropic Thunder, but like Gone Baby Gone.
Like, I feel like people often hire him when they're like, you know, like a Ben Affleck
where he's like, I know you're a good cinematographer, so just make my first movie look beautiful.
He shot Cloud Atlas.
Right. He shot Iron Cloud Atlas. Right.
He shot Iron Man 3.
Right.
He shot Jupiter Ascending.
And what's the most important movie that he ever shot?
Actually, no, there's two.
One we've already covered,
and one we're about to.
One we've already covered,
one we're about to?
One of them is my least favorite film we've ever covered.
Elizabethtown?
Correct.
And one we are about to cover.
Did he shoot in Nancy? He did.
We're about to cover it.
Not The Parent Trap.
We're about to cover it.
It's complicated? Correct.
You're talking the actual timeline of when we're recording.
Sure.
And John Toll, he had no experience shooting 3D
before this. That's interesting.
He shot digital before, right?
Yes, because like Iron Man 3, I'm sure that was this. That's interesting. He shot digital before, right? Yes. Because like Iron Man 3,
I'm sure that was digital,
like things like that.
And so anyways,
there's this 40-page PDF
that's about the making of this whole thing
that is fascinating to read
and it gets so deep
into the technical side of things.
But there's these two quotes in it
that I think are fascinating.
Right, because his other 3D movies
were all post-converted.
Yes.
He wasn't involved at all on set
in terms of thinking stereotypically.
Yes.
And I'm trying to think of,
was Cloud at? Jupiter Ascending and Iron Man 3 both terms of thinking stereotypically. Yes, and I'm trying to think of, was Cloud at?
Jupiter Ascending and Iron Man 3
both were like post-converted. Yes, I don't think
any of them were shot
stereotypically, which I'll explain why that's
such a crazy process. But there's two quotes that I think
are apropos to this whole thing. Number one,
rather than try to make
digital look like the last 100 years of film,
why don't we start exploring and try to
find the aesthetic and look of the digital age?
And then in trying to describe the look and feel of this,
he says, there's no need to discuss it.
It can't be described in words.
It's not a verbal experience.
You can see it whether you like it or not.
It functions at a different level
than movies you're used to seeing.
And that's something I want to say.
That's true.
It's true.
Empirically true.
We're going to try to explain it here.
It's going to be almost impossible for you to truly understand what it's like. It's true. Empirically true. We're going to try to explain it here. It's going to be almost impossible
for you to truly understand what it's like.
It's going to be like us telling you
like a ghost story.
Because truly.
It's hard to believe
if you haven't seen it yourself.
They would have these meetings
while they shot the film
where they would shoot dailies.
Also, they couldn't even screen the dailies
at 120 frames per second.
Sure.
Which I'll explain what all that means in a second.
They had to do it at 60 frames a second and all the that the heads of departments would sit there
and watch it and then angley described that like you'd literally see like the face their faces
sink because they would be like this is changing the entire language of film and what we know about
our jobs doesn't make sense anymore and we have to relearn it it's like both angley and john
toller like it was like going back to film school the language of film sense anymore and we have to relearn it. So like both Ang Lee and John Toll are like, it was like going back to film school.
The language of film totally changed
and we were out there trying to figure out
how this worked.
And they even admit some of the stuff
was not successful or some of the stuff
was out of their control.
And boy, oh boy, it was an interesting thing.
But they had to learn on the fly
how to do all this stuff.
I mean, that's the most interesting thing
about this movie is you see guys
rewriting the language of filmmaking
in a way that
kind of fucks with every
other aspect of filmmaking that
had been perfected up until that
point. And the experience of it. It makes performances
worse. It makes costumes
worse. They couldn't use makeup.
I'd argue it doesn't make them
worse as much as it shows
them for what they truly are.
Sure.
We'll talk about it.
Which is...
Yes.
But also,
here are some questions I have
from what I vaguely remember.
Like, the camera's very large, right?
Yes.
It makes a lot of noise, right?
Yes.
So you can't hear what you're saying.
Well, let me...
Or actors, like,
struggle to hear what they were saying.
And you can't do a lot of takes
because you just like
use up film really fast.
Three takes most.
No, it's so difficult
with the lighting and the focus
and everything to do multiple takes.
I'm just, these are all,
I remember hearing that these were hindrances
in the filmmaking process.
100%.
And I want to address all of those.
Here, Ben, I'm going to give you this first.
Just hold on to this for a second.
What the fuck is going on?
He just handed Ben an envelope?
Just hold on. Let me just say for anyone
who hasn't watched the movie and is
just listening to this episode because
they're a JD fan, right? Sure.
And they know what this episode's going to entail.
Before we get into the technical nitty gritty of this, I want
to just explain in a one sentence
way what this technology is
applied to. This movie is about
a Bravo squadron, right?
A group of heroes in the Iraq war in 2003.
Correct.
It's 2004.
The film was set in 2004.
Okay.
Right.
Early in the Iraq war.
They're fighting in 2003.
This is Super Bowl 2004.
It's not the Super Bowl.
Oh, it's not?
It's a Thanksgiving game.
Yes.
Interesting.
Because it's based on a Super Bowl performance.
This is obviously fictionalized. Kind of.
This is based on it.
Didn't Destiny Child actually do the Super Bowl
in 2004? I don't think so.
No, they weren't big enough for that. Let's look up
who did, performed
at Super Bowl 38,
which was, of course,
between the Carolina Panthers
and the New England Patriots.
Did you do that from memory?
No.
Beyonce sang the national anthem
but the halftime show
is I believe the notorious halftime show
where Janet Jackson's
wrist is exposed
by Justin Timberlake.
Yes.
So it's like a weird medley
where like Jessica Simpson did something
and they did something
you know like so whatever.
Anyway.
And he was going to have us naked by the end of the song.
The point being, it's a big football game.
It's a big football game.
This is just the Thanksgiving game in Dallas.
Like, yeah, a big football game.
It's going to have a halftime show.
Squadron's gone viral for their heroism through a cell phone video.
And now they're being brought out at the halftime show in this sort of like tribute to patriotism
and our wartime heroes.
And the lead character, Billy Billy Lynn is the super introverted
internalized dude who's
quietly sort of crumbling from PTSD
in this super overwhelming
set of circumstances.
It takes place all over this one day where they're
about to be feted and the next
morning they were going to be redeployed.
It basically takes place over like four hours.
So it's this one day where they're treated like heroes before they're just going to be sent back into the ship. They're going to be basically place over like four hours right and right so it's this
one day where they're treated like heroes before they're just going to be sent back into the they're
going to be sent back and there is there are subplots running such as like chris tucker plays
a pr person who's trying to sell their story and make them some money right kristin stewart plays
billy's sister who's trying to convince him not to return to war she's the reason he went he got
in the first place but she's now the anti-war figure.
And then you also have Vinnie Diesel
Vin Diesel plays the staff sergeant.
So you know this is a supporting role for him.
It's not a Vin Diesel film. It's him.
He's a company player. Who is the
person from their squad that they lost
in combat so they're mourning him.
This is all based on a novel
written by Ben Fountain in 2012
and Ben Fountain in 2012.
And Ben Fountain is like, he's not, it was his first novel.
He's like a short story writer, I guess.
And it was a well-regarded novel, but it's not like a bestseller.
It's an ascetically satirical novel that was well-regarded. The movie was written by James Seamus' assistant,
who was an associate producer on Life of Pi.
That's just stuff you need to know. Sure.
But that's a big thing is
the novel is
mostly his internal
monologue and is about the contrast
between what Billy Lynn's seeing around him and his
commentary on how much bullshit is around him.
It's him sort of calling out the hypocrisy
of the entire situation. It's a movie about
the hypocrisy of the Iraq war. The movie is now a kid
who barely speaks.
And the reason
Joe Alwyn,
right out of
drama school,
Taylor Swift's boyfriend now.
I graduated two days earlier.
Right.
And then it's got
Garrett Hedlund,
Steve Martin,
Vin Diesel,
Kristen Stewart,
Chris Tucker.
Wildcast.
Wildcast.
So that's the story
that he applied
all this
state-of-the-art technology to.
And the idea of that being
that there's that,
a lot of war veterans
will talk about that hyper-real feeling
of coming back
and feeling both removed
and too present in their environment.
And so this technology
that definitely creates that feeling,
the thought was that
could be an interesting way to reflect this.
It is being artistically deployed.
It's not just like,
well, let's try it.
There is a thematic purpose to the high frame rate.
But also after Life of Pi,
he got so interested in continuing to push boundaries,
he wanted to make this, what is it, Muhammad Ali?
Yes.
The Pharrell and Manuela movie.
George Foreman movie.
Which I believe he still sort of has on the back burner.
They shot test footage for that.
Right.
And that was when he
started experimenting
with all this
because he thought
that upping the frame rate
would help shooting boxing
not having to go
in slow motion
actually having the impact
of the punches
in real time
you know being able
to show it in a way
that was never actually
able to be captured
on camera before
and that movie
just kept on getting
slowed down
and he decided to apply
a lot of those
sort of breakthroughs
he'd been working on
to this film.
Yeah.
Yes.
Ang Lee has a whole theory
that he believes
that action is shot
in slow motion
because frame rates
are not capable
of actually portraying action.
Yes.
Now, I just know that
like a thing I'd heard
people work on this movie say
is that the goal
was to make the movie
feel like you're having
a panic attack.
Right.
And I like that idea.
And I will say, as someone who has
the weird crispness of everything,
all three of us, all four of us
in this room have had our battles with anxiety
and weird mental fogginess and all that
sort of stuff. I know when I'm in an
insane state of anxiety, this is kind of how
the world looks to me. It's that insane thing
where I feel super overstimulated, movement
feels really overwhelming, and I can't stop focusing
on everything all the time.
And so to a certain degree, on paper, you're like,
this sounds unbelievable.
But it's also really fascinating that the movie
doesn't feel very subjective
in a way where you're like,
this is how things look to him.
It's like you're watching
him in his environment and watching
him is overwhelming.
Let's get into the tech of it because i truly the tech of it i truly believe you don't have to do any more preambles i truly believe it will help contextualize
no more preambles okay so how much do you guys know about how cameras work and all this stuff
no just go for it fair amount question pitiful next to you sure sure right got it just no i just
want i yeah so assume little because you know we're talking to our listeners as well got it Paramount, but pitiful next to you. Sure, sure. Right. Got it. Just talk. No, I just want, I, so.
Assume little, because, you know, we're talking to our listeners as well.
Got it.
Not that they don't know anything.
But I want to try to explain this in a clear way, so feel free to ask questions.
Manuel Lebesgue listens to every episode.
He does.
That's why I have all these notes that's trying to organize the best way to describe it, because it's a little complicated.
It just folds in on itself.
Okay, so, first, the way you think about all cameras is you're trying to control light.
And there's three big questions that you are trying to determine is how long, so you got film,
right? We're trying to figure out how long light hits our film, which light hits our film,
and how much of that light hits our film. Those are the three elements that cameras are trying
to control. So starting with film, we know film, it's piece of plastic that has gelatin and chemicals on it.
Silver halide is the chemical.
The idea is that this is a chemical that when light hits it,
it reacts.
An interesting property of it is that you can have chemical
that is more or less sensitive to light.
The more sensitive to light it is,
the grainier the chemical is going to be.
And we measure that through a term called
ISO or ASA. ISO is the term we use. So basically, if a film is really sensitive to light, it'll have
a high ISO. If it's not that sensitive to light, it'll have a low ISO. The way ISOs work is like
you have 100, 200, 400, 800. 200 ISO film is twice as sensitive as 100 ISO film.
400 ISO film, twice, that's the idea of it.
That's when people talk about high speed film stock.
And that's also why,
that has sort of been the biggest sort of
forward track of film technology
is making film stock more and more reactive
to less and less light.
So you don't have to make everything as blandly and broadly lit.
And shine a bunch of lights and everything.
Right now, there's a lot of people that are like,
yes, but isn't everything digital now?
Yes, but I'm going to explain film because how digital works
is them translating the terms of film and the concept of film to digital.
So start with that.
So that's what ISO is.
That's sensitivity.
You have an ISO rating of stuff.
Okay.
So this is like a symphony orchestra you're setting up. So that's what ISO is. That's sensitivity. You have an ISO rating of stuff. Okay. So.
This is like a symphony orchestra you're setting up.
Like that's your violin player,
like warming up in the corner.
It all comes into play in this movie.
Oh yeah.
Okay.
So how long light hits our film?
Okay.
That's an important aspect of all of this.
So we all know 24 frames per second
is how movies work for the most part.
That is you're taking 24 pictures a second.
And the way the film works is that you have an individual cell in your camera.
You cover up a cell of it, a cell of this thing.
You uncover it to expose it to light, and then you cover it back up,
and you cover it back up.
Then you move the film to the next frame.
You uncover it.
You cover it back up.
24 frames a second is you're doing that 24 times.
That's sort of what the clicking noise is,
is that frame moving.
So you would think that means that
a 24 frames a second film,
each film is being exposed for a 24th of a second.
That's not correct though.
Because-
Della Steins.
Because as you can imagine,
for part of that time,
you're covering up the film to move it to the next frame.
Because if you're just moving it, it's going to smear.
Like when you do a long exposure, you know those photos where it's like someone holding a flashlight and moving it,
and it's like they're able to write with light in the sky?
Right, right, right.
That's what would happen if you're moving the film without covering it up.
So you cover it up with something that's called a shutter.
And a shutter, think of like a record, a spinning record, okay?
Or like a pizza, okay?
Something round.
Something round.
It spins, okay?
And you take pizza slices away.
So let's say we take half the pizza slices away.
That means we have a half circle that's spinning.
When that half circle is not covering the film,
that's being exposed.
When I cover it, it's being covered.
Now, if we take half the slices away,
we have 180 degrees. That is a, it's being covered. Now, if we take half the slices away, we have 180 degrees.
That is a window that's
180 degrees. That's called a 180
degree shutter. If we only take
one pizza slice away, that's
30 degrees. That's called a 30 degree shutter.
And the effect that this has is
you're more or less
smearing that image, right? So,
when you think of films where people get
super high or stuff like that, where it's like things are warping and sort of moving and smearing right? So when you think of like films where people get super high or like stuff like that,
where it's like things are warping
and sort of moving and smearing,
that's when you have a wide shutter angle,
aka like more than 180 degrees.
When you think of like-
More or less is a piece.
Is stuff cross industry standard though?
Yes, stuff cross industry standard.
It just helps to spin a little bit more.
When you have a narrow window,
like that's called a low shutter angle.
And that's something like in Saving Private Ryan,
when like bombs hit and it feels all like choppy
and really sharp, that's a low shutter angle.
So it's kind of that, what am I looking for?
When it feels almost strobe light.
Yeah, when it feels like a strobe,
a strobe light sort of thing going off.
That's because you're not seeing motion blur,
which is what it's called when motion smears across the screen.
So that's shutter angle.
Whenever you hear shutter angle, that's all it is,
is how many pizza slices you're taking away from the spinning disc.
Now, the thing I just want to butt in and say,
because this is always the thing I find most interesting
about the entire history of film,
is that 24 frames per second being the standard
was kind of an arbitrary decision.
Oh boy, am I going to get into this.
Okay.
But it then becomes the language
that all of us get used to
in terms of how any filmed media looks.
Yes.
24 frames per second.
It's like a refrain.
Right.
It's not based on the way we see.
It's based on the technical limitations
of the time
and then that becomes the language
for the next century.
Exactly.
But I'm going to get into the physics of stuff
because there's a reason why 24 frames
gets into it. Okay, so
so far we know how this works.
We got frames per second, which is
how many pictures we're taking per second is
frames per second, and our shutter angle
is how long in that
frame that it's being exposed.
Okay, so now we have to figure out what light reaches our film,
and that's where lenses come in.
Lenses are just pieces of glass, concave, convex,
that are taking light and refracting it into your film
or whatever your image sensor, anything that is, okay?
Long lenses are when you zoom in on something,
when you're seeing a small area.
Wide lenses are when you're seeing a lot.
We call wide lenses short lenses
because the glass is closer together
and the lens is physically shorter.
So, page two.
Page two.
So, now we get into focus.
The way lenses work is that,
yeah, I know, I'm flipping through my camera.
Camera lenses.
The way focus works is this yeah I know I'm flipping through my camera lenses the way focus works
is
this light that's
reflecting through the lens
is based on
the curvature of the glass
there's a point
in front of your lens
where things are in focus
they are
as sharp as possible
and from that point
okay
things that are closer
to the camera
or farther to the camera
go less out of focus
your depth of field that Your depth of field.
That's depth of field.
Yeah, Ben.
Ben's doing guitar solo.
And so a wide depth of field is when everything's in focus.
And a narrow depth of field, a shallow depth of field,
is when only a really small plane is in focus.
So an example is when you see in a movie they pull focus.
Yes.
It's like wide and then they zero in on an object or a person.
Exactly.
And the most like, you know, base way of describing is how much of the background is in focus around whatever the central focal point of the shot is.
Exactly.
And depth of field is really important because it determines all of your focus and everything that you're seeing in the frame.
And there's a couple of things that affect your depth of field.
First and foremost is the length of your lens.
A longer lens, a zoom, you know,
a long lens where you're zoomed in,
that's gonna have a shallower depth of field.
So that's like when you see like a closeup
of a tear going down someone's cheek
and the tear is in focus,
but even their eye, their cheek is not.
That's shallow depth of field, long lens.
When you have a short lens, wide angle,
there is a much wider depth of field.
And that's why when you shoot a landscape,
you can see mountains in the distance
are all in focus because when you're wide,
the focus can go on to infinity.
And Ang Lee tends to be a sort of long lens kind of guy.
Like Brokeback Mountain is a movie
that's all like long lens photography
because you're seeing them in their landscapes.
You had to get Steve Coogan's entire performance shot.
We've set up in an episode that Steve Coogan played the mountain.
Go on, J.D.
Set up the truth?
Yeah.
I mean, yes, we have set up the truth.
Right.
Another element that determines your depth of field
is how close your subject is to the camera.
So the farther away your subject is,
the bigger your depth of field is going to be, wherever your the camera. So the farther away your subject is, the bigger your depth of field is going to be wherever your focus plane is. And the closer your subject is to the lens, the shallower your depth of field is going to be.
Again, think of shooting mountains versus shooting someone close up, tears going down their face.
And also another way to think of wide angle lenses, like think of like Terry Gilliam.
He'll shoot a closeup with a wide lens sometimes, and more things will be in focus
because he's a wide lens,
but he's moving it physically closer.
So anyways, there's another element
that affects your depth of field, Ben.
That's your aperture.
Your aperture is...
Here's the drum player now.
Yes, this is the intensity,
how much light you're letting get to your film.
The aperture is like,
think of it like a sci-fi space door.
It's a bunch of blades that form a circle.
Butthole.
You can make the-
David.
David.
Sorry.
David.
David, we're in cinema right now.
Steve Coogan played the mountain in Brokeback Mountain.
Stop crust pizza.
Just trying to keep it light here.
You redeemed yourself.
You can make that circle small
or you can make that circle big
and that's your aperture.
Okay, that is like a butthole.
Okay, that's sort of like a butthole.
Kind of like a butthole. Think about it. Obviously, if that circle is small, less light's getting through. If you're making that circle big. And that's your aperture. Okay, that is like a butthole. Okay, that's sort of like a butthole. Kind of like a butthole.
Think about it.
Obviously, if that circle is small,
less light's getting through.
If you're making the circle big,
more light's getting through.
We measure that
with something called f-stops.
The lower the f-stop number,
the bigger the circle.
So f-stop of one is,
or there can be a little bit more,
depending, all the way open.
We call it all the way open.
And then you have one, 1.4, two, 2.8, 4, 5.6,
et cetera, et cetera.
We should make it clear
that this definition of
f-stop is very different
than Ben's definition of
f-stop, which is a place
where you can stop and
fuck.
You want to pull over?
I've got an f-stop over
here.
I know.
I have 24 miles to an
f-stop.
What do you say?
I vetted out an f-stop.
Oh, no. It's five five minutes away but something to keep in mind is that the bigger your aperture is the wider open
it is the shallower your depth of field is and the smaller your aperture is the more your depth
of field is that's why like a pinhole camera everything's in focus is because you have a
really small narrow aperture okay so those are the major elements
of how film works
well wouldn't you say
that the f-stop
changing that
and judging how
you're going to
shoot something
it's like coolness
versus like
blown out
and like
it being like
really high contrast
looking
and doesn't that
kind of play into it
as well
well so your f-stop
doesn't necessarily
affect your contrast
too much
but what it does is it determines how much light is hitting it.
So that's why you have light meters, things like that,
and you're trying to expose so that everything looks at the right exposure,
not too bright, not too dark.
But what you're talking about, Ben,
when people sort of take strong stylistic choices like that,
that's very often a byproduct of people applying the quote-unquote
wrong method for that type of shot.
Yes.
Like what JD was saying about like shooting closeups and like,
you know,
wide lenses like the Coen brothers do or Barry Sonnenfeld does where it's like
that weird distorted hyper real kind of thing.
Right.
It's like going up a few stops.
Yes.
What they say.
Right.
Yes,
exactly.
So now to talk about Billy Lynn.
Now that you understand that those concepts of how that all works.
Just hit an hour.
It's good.
We're doing great.
We can cut out the big three stuff.
We're on page three.
You know this episode is titled 12-Hour Walk, right?
Well, here's the thing.
Here's what I would argue.
I think it's more important to talk about the tech than to talk about the plot.
A hundred percent.
So.
Because we could burn through the plot in 10 minutes.
Plot?
I mean, shrug. shrug yeah so 120 frames per
second that is an insane endeavor because it is again way way higher frame rate than anything you
ever see so the camera spins around 120 the fucking you know there's 120 pictures with the pizza per second well so now we're in digital
in digital there's not actually there's not actually a spinning pizza but that was funny
everyone should be on the floor right now okay now we're adding our horn section so here comes
sorry go ahead i'm sorry um it's digital film you're right yes right this is not
celluloid so you don't have to
worry about that
mechanics
okay so now
I'm going to get into
ah fuck
what's the best
order of operations
to do this stuff
okay here's what
I'm going to do
you should probably
mark this episode
as explicit
just because
genuinely a lot of
people are going to
use this as
masturbation material
there are so many
blankies who like
just fully get off
on you explaining
things in this detail
but this is
I'm not joking I'm curious what you would think people are going to jerk off to this and that's cool There's so many blankies who just fully get off on you explaining things in this detail.
I'm not joking.
I'm curious what you would think, David. People are going to jerk off to this, and that's cool.
I believe that if...
There's a lot of blankies that are film critics, amateur film critics, things like that.
Sure, sure.
I believe that understanding the technology is important to being a good critic.
I think it is.
You can't let it...
Speaking as a film critic, you can't let it overwhelm your writing or your thought process because that's not for one what your readers really want and for two
you know there's more things going but you should yes the more you understand the better obviously
you could tell the best critics are the people who have an understanding of how all the different
aspects actually work rather than just looking at the final product yeah yeah and for all this
stuff i'm trying to explain it as simply as possible so there's some super nerds that might
know that i'm avoiding some details or maybe some funny something.
Like sort of toppings on the pizza.
Yes.
So here's some crazy shit
we're going to get into.
Or pizza in the bottle.
The way film works,
and this is now
getting to Billy Lynn stuff.
We can get out,
we're out of the film school stuff.
Now this is me getting into
what's crazy about Billy Lynn.
We're walking the walk.
The way film,
walking the walk 2018,
the way film works,
people often say
what allows a bunch of series of still images
to create the illusion of motion
is something called persistence of vision,
which is the idea that
if you right now wave your hand in front of your face,
you see that the image of your fingers is blurring.
And that's considered persistence of vision,
which is that the image sort of smears
in your retina and in your brain and so um that that helps you determine what in what direction
things are going how motion's working okay that's not true that is not what dictates motion that's
not what makes cinema works so now i'm going to get into some crazy stuff so there's a bunch of
these experiments that prove that this is not how it works. Here comes the maraca section.
David, you can't, oh my God,
if there's one podcast to get into cinema.
You're describing how cameras work,
but now you're like,
now let me upend to you the thought process.
We gotta talk vision, baby.
So there's these famous experiments
where you take, okay, an image of a red dot.
It's a still image of a red dot.
No motion blur, nothing.
And then you take that away and put up another image of a red dot. It's a still image of a red dot. No motion blur, nothing. Okay?
And then you take that away and put up another image
of a red dot
in another location.
Okay?
If you go between those images,
one to the other,
one to the other,
and you start increasing
the pace that you're going
between the two,
suddenly your brain
starts to assume
motion between them.
Instead of it being
one image of one circle here
and another here,
your brain goes,
that circle's moving
from here to here,
back and forth, back and forth.
And in the science experiments,
they refer to this in a certain amount of hertz
or a certain amount of milliseconds.
I've sort of tried to transmutate it
into frames per second, okay?
So the frequency,
which do that when you,
it starts as being still images,
and then, let me get my exact.
Phase four.
Yep.
Welcome to the Five Towers Club, by the way.
From zero.
Congrats.
Thank you.
From zero to five frames per second,
it's just succession, two images.
Then you get to partial movement,
where you get the sensation of things moving slightly.
And then, at around between 16 and 18 frames per second, which is really interesting, you have what's called beta movement.
Okay.
Which is just like these low testosterone sort of cock movements.
Hey, Ben, can you open that envelope?
Oh, my gosh.
This is like Neil Patrick Harris hosting the Oscars.
That's sort of why I did this.
Ben is opening the envelope.
What's it say on the front there?
Griffin will make a joke about beta movement.
And just open it up?
Fuck.
This is amazing.
Beta cuck movement.
Okay.
I mean, the guy knows me we're very good
very old friends
oh my fucking god
I just knew
Jesus Christ
I'm sorry
so around 16 to 18 frames I'm sorry.
So,
around 16 to 18 frames.
1,000 comedy points.
Thank you.
That really was
a tour de force.
That was incredible.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Listen,
you know people.
You know someone,
you know them.
We started doing improv together.
You have beta movement,
which is interesting.
And beta movement
is also called optimal movement.
That is the moment
at which movement
seems the most clear.
And what's 18 frames per second, David?
What?
I don't know.
18 frames per second?
That's the frame rate
that silent film started at.
Oh, sure.
That was the first time
when people were like,
oh, this is going to be the frame rate.
And that's because
it matches up with
beta movement,
optimal movement.
Then,
something crazy starts to happen.
As you increase the movement even further,
beyond 18 frames per second,
you get to something that is called the five phenomenon.
The what now?
Five phenomenon.
PHI, Greek letter.
Sure.
And that is that your eye stops looking at it going.
I can't get over the letter.
Sorry.
The letter thing is crazy. What if he hadn't done the joke? I almost't get over the letter. Sorry. The letter thing's crazy.
What if he hadn't done the joke? I almost didn't say cuck either. I did low testosterone
and then I was like, should I put it to bed?
You should have also written, David will be
exasperated by the joke. That would have been
the true coup de grace if you had also
gotten that in. Yeah, right.
Just sidebar for one quick second. That's why when
people parody like
silent film comedies,
it's often sped up movement.
People move too quickly or whatever.
Because it was a lower frame rate
that now has been converted when we watch it.
So you hit this thing called the five phenomenon,
which is when your eye stops thinking
that the red dot is moving
and starts observing the area around the dot
is moving theoretically.
And that's considered pure motion because you're not observing an object moving.
You're observing the idea of motion
without a visual cue to it,
which is only interesting to me
because that starts happening around 30 frames per second,
which is when people start to go,
how come video looks so weird,
which is around 30 frames per second.
Wait, wait, because that was the classic complaint about Hobbit at 48
was that it looked like a home movie.
Yes.
Behind the scenes footage,
it looked like a soap opera,
all the things that people throw out.
Or it looks like you have motion smoothing
on your television, right?
Which is a technology that creates fake frames in between
to try to get rid of any blurring.
Which is a technology designed kind of like for sports things like that are very fast moving video games that people have accepted at high frame rate
right and and then you buy your tv and like like half the fucking country just like watches movies
with motion smoothing on and like doesn't think about it and film nerds whatever like fall asleep
crying go to the bar and go like hey can i see your remote for a second right and i was in an airbnb in alaska and the tv had like i was it was like super motion smooth i
was kind of impressed like and i it took me forever to figure out how to turn it off well
so here's the thing that's that why motion smoothing is so weird is that what it's actually
doing is so when something's at 24 frames per second the time between those frames you know
the image changes right You're in one position
and you're in another position.
Your brain has to make up
what the movement is
between that.
And so,
the more your brain
is able to
interpolate,
add up whatever it wants
that it thinks
is going on between there,
that's what makes it feel
sort of
like
that like classic movie feeling
because your brain
is adding in a lot of the gaps there.
Then the higher the frame rate is,
your brain's not adding in gaps.
And with motion smoothing,
what it's doing is it's not even the actual motion.
It's a computer trying to guess what the middle is,
which is slightly off,
but your brain can't figure it out.
But it's like the dreamlike quality
that is at this point over a century
baked into the cake
of how we perceive movies and television,
what that visual language is
at its very core
and for years
like Douglas Trumbull
visual effects
yep
Titan was trying to get
the industry to go to 30
yes
and 30 was viewed as
too big of a jump
right
people won't stand for it
so the fact that like
Ang Lee and Peter Jackson
started full on multiplying
rather than just like
slowly adding frames
is insane right because here's here's the next step of all this the physics stuff is that Peter Jackson started full on multiplying rather than just like slowly adding frames. It's insane.
Wait, because here's the next step of all this, the physics stuff is that I think 30
frames is weird because you're right around this five phenomenon, which this is me totally
theorizing the physics of that being tied, but I think there's something to that.
But then once you get above 33 frames per second, you get into like simultaneity, which
is basically your eye, if two images are going back and
forth is unable to
distinguish one from the
other and as you move up
towards infinity that gives
you more just there's no
gap between the images
they're just on top of each
other in your eye so the
human eye for the most part
like like the highest it's
ever been recorded is like
500 something frames per
second theoretically that man died that man well it's like Air Force is like 500 something frames per second, theoretically. That man died.
That man,
well, it's like Air Force pilots.
He watched it back, right, yeah.
Well, no, what it is-
They lost oxygen.
What it is is that they will show someone
like a footage
and then flash an image
for whatever the millisecond is.
And if they can perceive it,
that, so,
most people are actually around 45
or a little around there,
a little above.
So 120 frames per second actually gets us to the point where for the most
part,
for most people,
it is more frames per second than our eyes and brains can actually process.
And so for us,
it just appears as reality.
So our brain isn't interpolating anything between the frames because every,
all the information
is given to it.
Which, in film,
and Ang Lee and John Toll
talk about this
in really major ways.
Want to remove the window
is the thing they kept on saying.
Film's always had
this window between it.
It's kind of foggy.
We want to remove the window
and make it look like reality.
You're looking at a box
on the wall.
The window is good.
This is the central question.
Here's what's so interesting.
I need the window.
In most movies,
you're looking at a box
in the wall
and the picture
happens to be changing.
Right.
Once you get above
120 frames per second,
especially with stereoscopic 3D,
4K,
and Ang Lee talks about this
and it's really interesting,
you are not aware
of the box anymore.
You're looking at the film
and it,
you know,
we're laughing.
It's like there are just people
on the other side.
Yeah,
it looks like there's a hole in the theater
and you're just seeing reality, which means
the way that, like, right now, the way that we're all
looking at each other, if you look around anywhere, you're not
perceiving the edges of your frame. You're just
looking, you're focusing on the things
around you because your eye has so much to take in.
When you watch this movie,
you're not aware of the frame.
And as such, the language
of film goes out the window. Framing, contrast, all these things go away. You're not aware of the frame and as such the language of film goes out the window framing
contrast all these things go you're not watching just people on a stage you're still watching a
movie that cuts you know that has close-ups people's heads that has people's arms dissolves
yes this is a movie that has a lot of complicated visual tricks right yes and like
ha like i mean like andy richter you said that joke about like his grandma watching a movie and has a lot of complicated visual tricks. Right. Yeah. And like, like,
I mean,
like Andy Richter,
you said that joke about like his grandma watching a movie and you cut to someone's head and she's like a severed head.
Like,
you know,
like that's funny.
Like this movie kind of feels like watching that.
And,
and in a way he hasn't done his career up until this point,
it has a lot of,
as much as I said,
it isn't a subjective film in terms of being from Billy Lynn's viewpoint.
A lot of the conversations as i said it isn't a subjective film in terms of being from billy lynn's viewpoint a lot of the conversations are subjective close-ups the coverage is like chris tucker
looking you in the eyes right so we were like walking out of there being like that's the
weirdest fucking phenomenon is seeing chris tucker deliver a monologue his head is like 30 feet tall
yep and it looks like you're seeing that through a window it looks like king kong
is outside your window talking to you about a movie deal.
It is wild.
And here's the other thing about that
is that there's something in frame
called the language of film,
which is certain rules that we believe exist.
Is that like the line, for example?
So there's the 180 degree.
There's something called the 30 degree rule.
Here's a really interesting one.
30 degree rule.
This is a rule that when you are making a film
and if you have a camera
pointed at something
and you're like in a wide shot,
if you're going to cut
to that same subject again,
you have to change the angle
by at least 30 degrees.
Otherwise,
your eye notices the cut.
Sure.
Because basically,
the image needs to be
different enough
so that your eye
isn't as attuned
to what's changing.
We had a different
30 degree rule
on set of The Tick, by the way,
which was the soundstage had to be 30 degrees
because Peter's costume was so hot.
That sounds like paradise to me.
I'm not even joking.
A lot of crew people wearing parkas in July.
The line, so say it's like JD and I are talking, right,
is that your camera would stay on one side of our conversation.
That's the 180 degree.
The orientation of the frame, if David's on the left and JD's on the right,
if you do a hard cut over to
fully the other side where then
David was on the right and JD was on the
left, your brain would reject it. It would just look stupid.
Although Phantom Thread crosses
the line many times, and it's one reason
those conversations are so strange and disorienting.
It can be used much
like we were talking about, breaking rules on purpose
to get a disorienting effect.
The great Jeff Erb, rest in peace,
one of the things he said about the line,
Jeff Erb, he was a cinematographer.
Sounds like an Erb.
Jeff Erb.
He was a cinematographer.
He was part of the ASC.
He was a professor at NYU.
He sounds like a Mario Kart villain to me.
But he basically said,
don't have to wear a 180 degree rule.
The thing you have to keep in mind is
characters should be looking the same direction on screen.
And that's all that your eye
really cares about.
How do you spell this guy's name?
Jeffrey.
B-R-B.
Interesting.
There he is.
Jeffrey D. Erb.
Yeah, he was incredible.
Passed away a couple years ago.
He died.
Wikipedia says he's still alive.
Not true.
No.
It sucks.
But,
so 30 degree rule,
a great example.
Have you done VR, anyone here? No. Yeah, I degree rule, a great example. Have you done VR?
Anyone here?
No.
Yeah.
I just did it on mushrooms.
Yes.
I listened to that episode of night call.
It's actually really great.
He talks about it.
So something in VR that they learned is that you can't cut in VR because
people throw up.
So they,
they do fades to black and then fades back up.
Yeah.
Because in VR,
when your reality just changes,
it's too, it's upsetting to your, and then fades back up. Yeah. Because in VR, when your reality just changes, it's upsetting to your balance.
Same thing happens in 120 frames.
The third degree rule does not work.
Coverage does not work.
Because as you look at it,
you believe you are perceiving reality.
And when it changes, it seems off-putting.
This is what I want to hear.
This is why.
I want to know why this movie looks so fucking weird.
And I don't mean the crispness of the visuals.
I mean how the camera moves.
The way your brain processes the information on screen actually kind of hurts you.
As we were watching, I was trying to explain to my girlfriend like what was so unsettling about just the movies, the way the movie's visual language works.
And it's hard to explain.
Yes.
Because I'm not that smart.
I'm stupid.
Big dum-dum.
So here's a really interesting thing. You're looking at me like you. I'm stupid. I'm a big dum-dum. So here's a really interesting thing.
You're looking at me like you want me to deny that you're a big dum-dum.
I was like, imagine a spinning pizza.
And she was like, I'm going to bed.
She's like, I'm done with this.
So people talk a lot about how 3D is like color film and sound being added to film.
It's not, in my opinion um because we
already had ways to uh communicate depth in film and the two ways were focus and contrast those
things both both communicated depth now we're using 3d to communicate depth and it's different
so in this film what they had to do is they started to realize is that contrast and shadows didn't work because we're used to a 2D plane, a square that we're dealing with the –
It's a rectangle.
Yeah, the rectangle that we're dealing with the balance of, right?
Because we are looking into it and we're perceiving it as reality, we don't need contrast or lighting or focus to tell us anything about what we're supposed to be looking at. Because that would be like if
you're looking out into the world and suddenly just one thing
is in focus. That means that you need to get glasses.
Now that's why I rewatched the movie in 3D last
night because I started out watching it in
2D high frame rate. Yeah. And
if you're going to lose one thing, it's
actually more disorienting to lose
the 3D in watching it because the way
it is shot and lit,
there is zero depth in the image if you're not watching it in 3D. Right it because the way it is shot and lit, there is zero depth in the image
if you're not watching it in 3D.
Because of that,
trying to mimic reality, quote unquote.
And so here's what they became up against when they're
shooting this. When you shoot stereoscopic,
you need two cameras. You basically have one
camera for each eye. You have something that's called
the beam splitter in the middle, which is a mirror
that shoots light off of it into
both cameras. Of course.
Right.
So,
they're shooting on Sony F65s, which are pretty heavy cameras.
Sure.
And you have this 3D rig
and all this stuff
that has to connect them
and combine them.
Oh.
And,
when you're shooting
120 frames per second,
you have a lot of
your batteries,
all the media,
it's huge.
A noise.
Their rig was over 100 pounds,
the camera. So, Ang Lee talks about how he's so used to shooting steadicam shots, it's huge. Their rig was over 100 pounds, the camera.
So Ang Lee talks about
how he's so used to shooting
steadicam shots,
things like that.
A steadicam operator
cannot hold 130 pounds
on their shoulders
for more than two seconds.
And there's very little
camera movement
of any kind in this phone.
It's a lot of static
lockdown long takes.
The moves feel very like
you really notice
when the camera moves.
And when you shoot stereoscopic,
you need those two things to be totally in sync.
So like a great example of this
is that they shot these on Master Prime,
which are really beautiful lenses,
but they had to go through dozens of lenses
to get two of each lens that matched
because lenses are, you know, made by humans, fallible.
Things will be wrong with them.
If only we could get rid of humans.
That's page five of JD's manifesto. Now, fallible. Things will be wrong with them. If only we could get rid of humans. That's page five of JD's manifesto.
Now, the humans.
The humans ruin film.
Cinema.
Oh, boy.
So, they're shooting this
with these giant camera rigs
that are hard to move.
On top of that,
you need to be perfectly synced.
Something they ran into
while shooting this
was that because they're 120 frames per second,
they could not get
the cameras to be totally in sync.
They would be off by a couple frames, which
totally changed how
media managed. Sounds like a fucking stupid idea then.
It's crazy. This is like the rule when
Tommy Wizzaro is like, we'll shoot digital
and film at the same time. The thing that's
crazy about this movie,
craziest about this movie for me,
is that he decided
to apply all of this to
making a full feature film that was going to be
released in theaters, rather than going like, let me
get technology companies to give me five million
dollars to make a short. Blank check,
baby. Which is kind of like
Inaritu's VR film, like that's a short.
Right, that kind of thing. Where he's like, let me try and begin
to develop a way to use this. Legendary gave him the budget
to sort of test out what happens if you give
and he uses it in a clever way and it's like
there's an immersive concept to that movie
that makes sense
but this is an all or nothing thing in the same way that Attack of the Clones
was where it was like I'm gonna do the learning curve
we're just gonna build this whole plane in the air
while making the movie and just put it up on screen
I'm building this for you cinema community
we're gonna do it on a script that's like
from an untested writer
that's not a movie that's
screaming out for this. Like we said,
there is some thematic concept here, but
there are other ways to use
visual and film language to
communicate that this guy is feeling weird.
It's been done. Right. The crazy side
effect of that for me is that
because of the way they had to light everything,
frame everything, set up the camera, move,
you know, the way they directed actors,
the way they dressed or didn't dress the sets,
all of these things, the film is essentially
unwatchable in every other format.
So, that it's not like a 3D
movie where you can just remove one of the two.
If you just watch it in like
a 2D. Like you can watch Avatar in 2D and you argue
that it's not as good, but it still does work
in the way that you're used to watching a movie.
It makes sense.
This movie looks strange even when it's in normal frame rate.
Yes.
So to answer your question of why does this look wild,
so first, the camera rig is totally unwieldy.
Right.
So the speed at which you're used to shooting stuff is impossible.
Second, as they start to shoot, they learn that coverage does not work,
which is when you're shooting a scene, you get close-ups, angles.
Right.
That doesn't work with this.
And then you can put it all together in the editing room.
Then, here's where I explain
all of how cameras work to you guys.
Ben has the biggest, smallest face.
Here's where I explain why cameras work to you.
So, because you're using all this technology,
and this technology, I'll start by saying this.
The production designer,
there's a great quote where they talk about,
usually when you production design a scene.
So like right now, if you look at like
the wall of this building, right? We're looking at a wall
in this somewhat newly built studio. You can tell that the paint looks like it's a newly built
studio. And that's because there's not years of layers of paint painted on top of it. And we
perceive that because we're in this room. Whereas when you go into like a New York apartment where
there's 40 layers of paint, you can sort of perceive that. But when it's in movies, you don't
really notice that. In Billy Lynn, you
do notice it. The production designer was like,
usually in films, I would put three or four coats
of paint on a wall. And in this film,
I had to put 30 or 40 because
you would notice it. You would
notice it. Likewise, the makeup
artists were like, you couldn't put makeup on because
you could see it. You see it. You see any makeup
on these people's faces. And it
gets into like, if any listeners have ever been on any film set of any sort there's always that disorienting
experience even if you're on the lowest level thing you know where you're just like god this
looks so fake i can't believe it photographs is real on camera and they're like we've been doing
this for a hundred years we know what it's supposed to look like no trial and error these
things have been developed bit by bit and they essentially tried
to rewrite the entire language of cinema
in one 120 minute movie.
And here's what's so wild. Not just the language
of cinema but the language of how you produce
a film. Every different
department. Yes, every department.
Anything that looks slightly off or slightly
manufactured is glaring
in Billy Lynn. But
because they're shooting in 3d your beam slitter splitter
takes away one stop of light it's it takes away half of your light then because you're 120 frames
per second that takes away that takes away two and a third stops of light fuck so now we're losing
stops everywhere three and a half stops of light okay Then Ang Lee is like, everything needs to be in focus.
What did we learn about focus?
To have things be in focus,
you have to have a small aperture,
which means what?
You need more light.
So they got into the situation
where they needed sometimes
five or six times as much light.
Because also,
the F-65s they're dealing with
sort of have a built-in digital ISO
of like 800.
And anytime you push
it above that you start getting digital noise so of course they were anything that was slightly not
real stuck out like a sore thumb but they also needed to find a way to pour a light in in a way
that has never been done in cinema before which is like like square peg round hole those things do
not fit that's why like if you look at the behind the scenes stuff
of them shooting the Super Bowl,
there's these big helium balloons
you can fill with helium,
float into the air,
put really bright lights in.
They had like 10 of them in the air
just to shoot as much light as possible
onto the subjects.
Likewise, Ang Lee was like,
contrast doesn't work.
Lighting doesn't work.
We have to keep it low contrast
just so as an audience member,
you can look at it
and just pick out what you want to look at in the frame.
So it's this insane endeavor
of anything that's slightly messed up,
you're going to notice,
and everything is messed up because we're doing this.
And you're also, I mean,
the experience that everyone who's seen this movie projected
in the full Ang Lee format,
a format they never came up with a name for.
They should just call it the full Ang Lee.
Yeah.
In Ang-O-Vision is that you can't stop focusing in on weird things in the background.
Sure, sure.
Like you get really hung up on signs on walls or like certain background actors.
Especially if something doesn't look totally right. If their background, because a big thing on set
is you go like, hey, we need clean sound
so all the background actors just mind talking.
And you can't stop focusing
on how fake the people
pretending to talk in the background look.
Which is something you never pay attention to.
It's weird that you would do all of this
in a movie where you have someone playing a fake
Beyonce. Yes, that's the thing.
That's the weirdest. The weirdest of all things. I know I've already said other things are the weirdest album in the movie where you have someone playing a fake Beyonce. Yes, that's the thing. That's the weirdest. The weirdest of all
things. I know I've already said other things are the weirdest album in the movie.
My girlfriend immediately, the second
was like, that's not Beyonce.
And I was like, well, no. I mean, they couldn't get
Beyonce. It's all that you can think
about. So the second she's on screen in the
most important scene in the movie. And you only ever
see the back of her head and it's the most glaring thing
in the world. And like every time she turns
around and the other members of Destiny's
Child, you know like which they might do
like if they're deep in the background, you notice
it because you're like, oh I see how we're not really
able to see their face. It's a haircut. Right.
But there's even this shot where it's like
her in the foreground from behind
adjusting her wig and in the background
totally in focus. You see the line of like the seven
Bravo guys and it is somehow
the most amateur hour shot. It looks
like garbage. That's exactly it.
You're like, why does this look
cheesy? Like this movie is
supposed to be like a visual revolution.
It looks cheesy. It looks cheesy
because anything that's not real, you
notice. Which is why I think this
technology should be used to make like a
film like Koyaanistatsi
or like Baraka samsara
so much better for documentaries and that's why i thought i thought casting uh what's his name is
the lead is really interesting because he's not necessarily an actor actor he's a guy that's sort
of new whereas something that angley talks about and that you you and i noticed was when you look
into the eyes of the actors performing this movie, you see an actor performing. You see all
the insecurity. You see them remembering their lines.
It feels like you're reading their mind. You see
them making the choices. And the
thing that's astounding is, I think Joe Allen
is really good in this movie and comes
off the best of all the actors. He's good. He has the
least talking to do. I disagree that he's the
best in the movie. Garrett Hedlund? Yeah.
He's very good as well. He's excellent. He's the only one who
seems to have figured it out. Yeah. Because it's not just the visuals. It's also the best in the movie. Garrett Hedlund? Yeah. He's very good as well. He's excellent. He's the only one who seems to have figured it out.
Because it's not just the visuals. The script
is so weird. The script's very odd.
The thing with Joe Alwyn is that
he's straight out of drama
school. So he is a real actor
but he's not an actor who has any
real prior experience with on-camera
stuff in any serious way. So he doesn't have
the movie-making tricks that he has
to ignore. They didn't have to teach him how
to unlearn, because
people like Vin Diesel
and Steve Martin, my best
friends, are people who have
over decades developed
such a strong sense of technique
in terms of what their relationship to the camera is.
Vin Diesel, above all else, is an actor who's
like, I know exactly how to play on camera, I know
what my angles are, I know the disable I talk at
This is my relationship
And then you watch him in this and you're like
I see Vin Diesel thinking about when lunch is going to be
Fair enough I mean he's hungry
I think Vin is fine in the movie
I think Kristen Stewart's fine
I even think Steve Martin's okay
All of them play better when you're watching it normal frame rate
That's probably true
Yeah everything does They're medium even think Steve Martin's okay. All of them play better when you're watching a normal frame rate. Yeah, that's probably true. I was going to say. Probably true.
All of them do.
Yeah, everything does.
Because that's their medium.
They're the three actors
who are the most,
or the four actors
who are most experienced
in the old school way
of cinematic language.
Joe Alwyn works well
because it's like
Ang Lee taught him
how to be on camera
specifically for this camera.
And they talk about
how they did so many
fucking tests with him
because the studio
didn't want to hire
a totally unknown guy
who'd graduated from drama school literally two days before they put him on the plane.
So they did like 10 tests with him.
They kept him in Texas like doing tests or L.A., I think, for 10 consecutive tests over the course of like two weeks.
So they were a testing him and testing the technology at the same time.
So I think his performance is the most married
to everything they were trying to do technology.
And that's the other thing.
As they shot this,
they couldn't watch it in 120 frames per second.
The technology did not exist for them to watch dailies.
In fact, even in post-production, in editing,
they could not watch it in 120 frames per second.
So they were making a movie and being like,
right, hopefully this will all come out in the wash.
They're making a movie like the Lumiere brothers.
It's like you shoot it and you go like, I hope this this will all come out in the wash. They're making a movie like the Lumiere brothers. It's like you shoot it
and you go like,
I hope this turns out.
And you don't know.
I have a question though.
Shoot.
If I'm traveling,
let's say going on a trip
somewhere.
Like a long half time walk.
You know,
where would I,
what would I use
to transfer things
from one place to another?
Well, that's the thing.
Look, if you're taking a long halftime walk, you don't want a lot of things in your pocket, right?
Jangling around, cutting into your thighs and the like.
All right.
You know?
I hate when that happens.
A lot of people go, like, luggage.
It's so inconvenient.
It's so heavy.
Why would I pack a bag?
pack a bag well maybe maybe someone has just entered this space a disruptor into the luggage space to send all your problems with luggage away oh you're talking about the team of thinkers
seekers and designers who've created a new kind of luggage luggage with power and i don't mean
power like emotional power i mean like like real Well, like you can plug your phone into the thing.
Like power season six on Starz.
Exactly.
And this is a product that designed after asking thousands of people how they pack,
why they travel, what bugs them about their luggage.
So this bag, it doesn't have sticky wheels, you know, solving old problems.
But it also solves new problems like dead cell phones.
Yeah.
Well, it's got a battery
built in so you can charge on the go but the thing here's the thing i really like about it okay
okay shoot i sweat a lot for a man as as small as myself and i use the term man very loosely
fair enough i i sweat like joe cocker at woodstock and so if i go on vacation my clothes are like
you don't get a second use out of them, right?
When I pack my bag, I'm always like, dirty clothes in the same bag with the clothes I didn't wear. Am I getting a plastic bag from a bodega and stuffing the dirty clothes inside?
Here's the thing they do.
Removable, washable, laundry bag.
They do.
Keeps dirty clothes separate from clean inside.
So you get to separate, segregate your dirty clothes from your clean clothes.
Maybe segregate was a loaded term
to use, but you put it in
there, you close it off, then when you get home, you pull
the bag out, you put it in the wash. Done.
Alright, now I gotta tell you,
this sounds awesome because I currently
don't have a home. Ben is homeless.
And this is not a joke. I don't have an apartment
so I think I need this.
Ben's like Pete Holmes because he's crashing.
He's crashing.
In several different applications of that term.
It ships for free.
How could I get this?
Ships for free anywhere within the lower 48 states.
You're in one of those.
You can buy it with all major U.S. airlines if you want to take it as a carry-on.
You can get it in many sizes.
The carry-on, bigger carry-on, medium, the large.
Because you might be living on an airplane but if you want 20 off a suitcase you visit awaytravel.com slash check and you use
promo code check during checkout okay so i check to make sure the promo code box is there and then
what do i type in i'm gonna repeat myself for 20 off a suitcase visit awaytravel.com slash check
and use promo code check during checkout. That's $20.
And, you know,
they're great. I have one.
I'm taking it to Toronto in just a couple
days. Double humble brag.
Great. Well, thank you for answering my question. Let's get back to
the walk episode. Talk in the walk.
Get back to talk in the walk.
Ding dong. Oh, who's that? Let me open.
Hey, kids. It's me, Ronald McDonald.
The official sponsor of Blank Check.
If you come to a local McDonald's and use the promo code Blanky, I'll cut your Big Mac
and hack.
Why is he?
You can take one half now and take one half home.
The fucking clown from It.
He's Pennywise.
That's what the kids like.
McDonald's keeps up with the times.
They got artisanal chicken sandwiches and they got Pennywise. That's what the
kids like. I'm out of McDonald's.
Don't steal my burgers.
But 100% that is a real ad, so I recommend
you go to a McDonald's and when you're ordering,
say to the cashier, promo code check.
Yes, and just wait. And if
they don't know what you're talking about, you go,
I heard you were going to hack my Big Mac
and hash. Hack my Mac.
Promo code check. Hack my Mac. Promo code check.
Hack my Mac.
What were we talking about?
Hashtag hack my Mac.
We were talking the walk.
Don't entertain.
Here's something interesting.
Here's an interesting byproduct of all this stuff.
In 3D films, usually, there's an issue.
And this is a big issue in Life of Pi where there's motion blur issues because motion will start mid-frame
or something like that,
and you get this weird ghosting feeling.
The camera movement's too fast
if the movement of the characters on screen's too fast.
Yeah, and it doesn't work.
In this, it's all good, baby.
It all works.
Yeah.
And you're watching football players,
and you're watching dancers at the halftime show,
people moving very fast.
Have you ever noticed in a movie
when the camera will pan across a scene,
and you're like,
oh, I can't look at that.
And that's motion judder.
It's a problem that happens
because your brain can't track
all the changes that are happening,
especially when there's motion blur.
And it's especially disorienting
to look at in 3D
where it's trying to render blurs
in three dimensions,
which doesn't really make sense.
But Life of Pi is a better movie
than this movie.
Yeah, I would agree.
But 120 frames per second,
that problem doesn't exist. So there's all these
things that as you watch this movie where you're like this feels weird and different I can't tell
why. And this is the thing that I feel like suckers I would say some of these directors into this like
James Cameron Peter Jackson where they're like I want my special effects to look cleaner I want
these like big action scenes I'm looking you know to like be more easy to follow with your eyes.
Hub in 48 frames per second is mostly a nightmare to watch,
but anytime there's
an entirely CGI creature
on screen,
you're like,
this is actually pretty stunning.
Looks good.
Like Gollum looks amazing.
But the problem is
that a guy wearing Hobbit makeup
looks like a guy
wearing Hobbit makeup.
You can like see
the seams of the nose.
You see the difference
of the refraction of the light,
you know?
You see the guy in his eyes
being like,
am I a believable Hobbit right now?
A hundred percent. Yes. You don't feel anymore like you're in fucking Rivendell of the light you know you see the guy in his eyes being like am i a believable hobbit right now 100
yes you don't feel anymore like you're in fucking rivendell or whatever whereas in the original
lord of the rings shot on film as far as i know like where he's just like let me point the camera
in new zealand like you're like oh this looks seems like another world because there's a window
it's like give me the window well it's like Bill Plimpton does the animations. He
draws in twos or fours,
right? And you watch that and you enjoy
it because your brain is interpolating between it.
Here, oh boy, you're just getting reality.
You're looking at Steve Martin and you're like,
Steve Martin's not sure if he can do this.
And Steve Martin is
aware of the fact that he's wearing a suit that they just
bought yesterday. You can tell all
of these things. And you're like, did Steve Martin get a facelift?
You're looking at all these aspects of things that could usually be hidden on camera,
plus you feel like you're looking into everyone's minds.
Steve Martin is the biggest one where you're just like,
oh, that's Steve Martin.
That's all I'm thinking about when he's in it.
He's not playing a character.
It's just Steve Martin. It's weird. He's got weird makeup. You're like, why is Steve Martin talking like that? That's not how'm thinking about when he's in it. He's not playing a character. It's just Steve Martin.
It's weird.
He's got weird makeup.
Why is Steve Martin talking like that?
That's not how he talks.
Do you know that he was offered the Chris Tucker part?
Ang Lee really wanted him for that.
They announced that Steve Martin was in talks for Billy Lynn.
Then they said he had dropped out because he didn't want to play that part.
Then he came back and was like, I'd like to play the owner.
Then he was back in the movie and this part feels like a far less natural fit for him which i find fascinating because in born standing up his memoir uh he talks about how he felt completely
discouraged from being in dramatic films because he remembers going to see the premiere of the
spanish prisoner the mammoth film he's in. Right. And
the audience laughed when he came on screen
and he was like, that's it. Conclusively, they will not
take me seriously as a serious person. I don't
want to fall on my face and embarrass myself by trying
to do that. And then in this movie, they offered
him the part that was a little more
comedic in a drama. Right. And then
he decided to go for the character that is very
dry. Yeah. Very dramatic.
Right. Right.
Really weird. And then you're watching him and seeing that intent in his
performance. Yeah, it's wild.
I have a question about VR. You brought
that up earlier and I just experienced
that. Yes.
And it was intense.
But that was because I was on
Silver Siphon.
And that will make things feel very intense. And you were doing that on Earthshroom. but that was because I was on, you know, silver siphon. That'll make everything.
And that will make,
you know,
things feel very intense.
And you were doing that on our firm.
Vin Diesel's fallen hero from this movie,
which you don't even know his name because you don't watch it.
Yes.
Uh,
so I,
though I was thinking about the,
we were like the whole time. Yeah.
Friends and I went,
we were talking about the implications of this technology.
Yeah.
And like,
even just thinking like how in like some weird,
creepy,
like Berlin club,
there's like horrible designs of like VR reality that you could like engage
in.
Right.
Um,
so,
you know,
but the other thing I was thinking about of like,
sort of like how we're all talking about like,
uh,
big flashy superhero movies is the future.
So even just thinking of like, are we going to start going to movies and put on a VR mask like I did?
Oh, God.
Because the thing that I will say about it and then walk around in a room like I was, you know,
in these different installations, because the thing about it is,
I don't know if that's storytelling.
I kind of agree with it.
It just becomes immersion.
Well, so here's the barriers
that are in the way of VR right now.
Number one, you have motion lag,
which is when you move your head,
there's a slight lag between the video moving
and you moving.
And if you think of VR,
most of the VR experiences you've had
have probably been CGI, right?
Because filming live action footage,
the only thing you can really do right now
is take a single data point
and be collecting everything that's coming into it, right?
Right.
Whereas true 3D,
the experience of living life
is that I can walk around objects
and see the different angles of them
as opposed to standing in one spot
and just looking around me.
So we'll have to develop technology
that allows you to actually explore and change
and interact with real footage
in a way that is as dynamic as the real life.
Because until then, you're just stuck at a finite point
and everything around you, you can look at.
So that's why I don't think that's coming.
But I do think this technology
of 120 frames per second 4K 3D
is a step towards that.
Because, again, right now we are
inhibited by the rectangle screen,
but this technology proves the rectangle
doesn't really matter when you have
a high frame rate like this. So I do think
there'll be interesting things. But I think this is, I think
where, I think this is
a very early stage of something
that will probably develop into something more reasonable
and more useful to us. But this is the first step.
It will be a long time before... A long half-time walk.
It will be a long half-time walk before it turns into anything that is
more experiential. I'm going to say this in the dumbest
way possible, but what I find fascinating is all of these
techniques and technological advancements say this in the dumbest way possible, but what I find fascinating is all of these techniques and technological
advancements, which are in the name of trying to
the notion they throw
out is we want to greater reflect reality.
Make the image you see
on screen feel more like how your eyes function,
what the real world looks like to you.
When it's with
live action elements,
weirdly starts to have an uncanny valley
effect because you're starting to notice how fake everything is.
Right.
And the CGI rendered elements always work better.
You know, like this stuff works in video games, works in VR.
I mean, if you were going to try to push the high frame rate thing just as its own thing,
it would make more sense to do that with CGI animated films.
You know, to say like Coco's being released on limited screens in 48 frames per
second and that might fucking work that's kind of what could be the breakthrough for the technology
at least to get people to sample it but god animators would kill you having to animate 120
frames per second it literally if you're doing 48 it doubles their workload right you know and
and i mean it will that's the thing all this bullshit is a lot of bullshit but at least it's
like you are still just pointing a camera
at someone and turning it on.
It's not like animation where they have to,
they can't just point a camera at something and turn it on.
Because Pixar movies, which are state-of-the-art,
are still done in 2K,
and there's been some questioning of like,
why wouldn't you go to 4K live-action films
that are in 4K now?
And it's like, because it literally would double
our work and our budget.
But I would want to, instead of watch a movie
about robbing a bank,
I want to rob a bank.
But you can and already have done that.
You just buy a gun and rob a bank like you do.
Good time.
All right.
He's taking the fifth.
Oh, weird.
Okay.
Do you remember that time that Ben walked into a bank
and said,
this is just good time VR?
With a loaded shotgun?
What's wild about all this talk, too,
is that the technology does not exist
for 120 frames per second really yet.
Like Avid, which is the editing system everyone uses,
it only released its sort of like beta version
of 60 frames per second
during Billy Lynn.
So they had to by hand
track and manage their media,
like an Excel file they had open
to track, to line up the frames,
get everything to work
because it does not exist yet.
You're just telling me this
and I'm so stressed out
because they made a bad movie.
Like it sucks to hear all this
and it'd be so great to hear all this,
and you'd be like,
and the fucking result is there.
Like, what a titanic film
that will always be remembered.
That's the thing I find so interesting about it
as an artifact.
Yeah, it's interesting.
Is that if you were doing, like,
a five-minute short film,
and when we walked out of this movie,
we talked about it for a bit,
and then we met up, like, two days later
to talk about it for, like, another three hours, right?
You and I just walked around and talked about it.
The big thing we were going into is, okay, there
is potential in this thing.
What kind of movie could you make with this?
You'd have to fully design it around the technology.
And we were going, is it a film that only takes
place in one location? Is it something where
you have entirely non-professional actors?
Is it a documentary? Is it
this visual aesthetic? Is it this type of story?
I mean, we're running through all these different possibilities, right?
And if you were doing, like, let's design a bunch of five-minute short films, testing out the different sort of genres, aesthetics, all these things that would work with it, whether, you know, we were saying, is it better if it's improvised?
Because then you don't see people trying to memorize their lines.
If they're really reacting naturally in the moment, if they don't know what they're going to do, all that sort of stuff.
To have to deal with this
level of problem solving
takes up so much mental energy
and so much time that it
just feels like you're watching this movie
and there's like a fifth as much
energy spent on the actual movie
as a storytelling device
as there should be. And a big part of that is
these shots are so difficult
to set up
that they said like
it was like
two, three takes maximum.
So dramatically
I finally hit it last night
where I was like
this feels like a shittier
Clint Eastwood movie.
Where he famously is like
I don't want to take
too long in this.
It's two setups.
It's three takes.
Either you're ready
or you're not.
And sometimes it totally works
because you've got Tom Hanks
that's a pro
and sometimes it's 15-17
to Paris
and you're like what the fuck is going on here? And it It's a pro. And sometimes it's 15, 17 to Paris. And you're like,
what the fuck is going on here?
And it feels like abstract art,
but at the weirdest moments,
this feels like abstract art,
except performed by people who are very professional.
I'm watching this movie.
I had seen it twice already,
but I'm watching this movie with Joanna and like,
uh,
the first 20 minutes,
like,
you know,
the weirdness of it.
I'm like,
I do love that idea that he feels like the world is feeling a little too real.
And also that idea that we lionize veterans and military people and he's trying to present
them in total clarity and show you how scared and shaken up they all are.
And I'm like, I love this.
And then 20 minutes in, or maybe 25, he's having that conversation with the cheerleader.
Yeah.
And they're saying these weird long monologues to each other about like how they really feel and you're just like this is one of
the least engaging scenes i have ever seen and from two actors who i think are pretty good it's
just like this movie is fucking terrible yeah this is boring and i'm like yeah yeah i know it this is
a bit of a rough scene and then you realize like it just sort of like sinks into the muck like it
can't pull itself out it just doesn't have engaging pathos like you know what i mean apart from the halftime walk which
is pretty good and i've been in this scenario a thousand times on set but if a scene like this
is just not really grabbing you what you would do after two takes is go like okay let's throw it all
out so what would make this maybe let's change the blocking let me give you a different direction
but it was kind of like they had to go with their first draft ideas of every single shot at least in terms of performance and like there are scenes
like the big steve martin speech scene where he's that's his scene where like network scene where
he's like mostly delivered in direct address like here's and he just kind of gives this like somewhat
flat speech and then you're kind of like then the movie moves on and you're like that was important.
Was that important? Does that matter?
And especially for A. Lee, a guy where it's like he just likes
to sit on set in silence
for an hour and a half to get a full understanding
of the space. He likes to work with actors'
body language, do breathing exercises.
He's so precise about sort of
the dramatic, you know,
his
technique in terms of that reserve.
And a lot of times that's whittling down
from bigger performances to
getting smaller and more nuanced things.
And with this, it's like they just don't have the space
to do anything other than
what the first strike is.
That said, though,
well, here's what I want to say. And this is me not being
a critic. You're a film critic.
That's what you do professionally
I'm just a fanboy of films
I'm J.D. Miter
and I love movies
I don't
I don't like this film
being categorized
as a bad movie
or a terrible movie
I think this is a
really courageous thing
I think that it takes
I think it takes a lot of guts
to go
we're going to be the first ones
to use this technology I think it's a really novel idea it takes I think it takes a lot of guts to go we're going to be the first ones to use this technology
I think it's a really novel idea
it is
it is
I like the idea
the movie is like Fitzcarraldo
it's like the actual event
pushing a church up a hill
or whatever
right
it kind of doesn't matter
what happens
when the boat gets
to the other side of the mountain
but the fact that they
hold it up the mountain
is in and of itself
and it's like
I think
his instinct to go Alvin Lucinda what's the movie with the church it up the mountain is in and of itself. And it's like, I think his instinct to go,
Oh,
Alvin Lucinda.
What's the movie with the,
it doesn't matter.
Carry on.
Jesus Christ.
But his instinct to go,
let's make this,
let's use this technology
to make a film about a vet.
Like that all matches up.
And of course,
sure,
it doesn't totally work out.
And there's aspects of
the story that don't
turn the line up.
But I feel like when
everyone's like,
oh,
it's a bad movie.
It's a terrible movie.
Like I disagree.
I think this is,
as people who love blank checks, we should be rallying behind this because 100% if blank checks need to be uh measured on whether they're perfect or not then we're not going to get
any more blank checks we're gonna get Marvel movies and Star Wars movies no but Marvel movies
and Star Wars movies aren't perfect they're just like they're a guaranteed you know what I mean
like but that's but like they're just guaranteed to be pretty watchable.
That's exactly,
100%.
You're saying he took
the big swing.
I'm saying he missed.
Now,
we both admire
the swing.
Which I agree with.
Right.
But I don't think
that means it's a terrible film.
I'm saying,
right,
but he missed.
So,
like,
that's bad.
I don't think it's a terrible film.
I think it's not a good film.
Not a good film.
Yeah,
I gave it like,
it's like a 6 out of 10 for me.
It's just a weird thing
to say about a movie like this because it's such a polarizing bizarre movie but it is kind of
like a film where you're like this doesn't really succeed but it is so unusual and it's hard to hate
i will say two things about it one jd and i i love this and largely agree with you on this but i know
you're a big proponent of the experience of making the movie should be as much a work
as the movie itself. I think that can be
as valuable creatively. Right.
And this is like an ultimate example of that.
Yeah. And certainly the process
and the challenge of what they put themselves through is
more interesting than the movie itself in this case.
You wish there was a Burden of Dreams style documentary
about the making of this film just so all of that
could be documented. The tragic thing about
it is the movie is essentially
unwatchable to most people now. Can we talk about
that after I'm done? Yes, in one second, because
this is the second point I want to get to. Okay.
But it's like, most people can't see it the way it was intended,
and because of the way it was intended,
the version that does now exist for people to watch
feels compromised, and just doesn't really make sense.
Right. Now, the thing
about this movie for me, though, is
I just always remember, because it's not a fancy
wording but it sticks in my head whoever it was at the new york new yorker i think it might have
been anthony lane when spider-man 3 came out did his whole pan of spider-man 3 but said there's
this one fucking sequence in the middle the birth of the sandman sequence but for five minutes
there's nowhere else in the world you'd rather be and i think about that sometimes sometimes with a movie that doesn't work, but you get the one sequence where it's
like, this is what the director was trying to do. And for a brief window, it totally crystallizes.
And for me, the actual walk itself is that. When I saw this in theaters with you at 120 frames,
in 3D, in 4K for the walk, I went, I fucking get it. And this feels like a masterwork.
This is brilliant. And it's insane how when you watch
it not in that format it doesn't totally work
at all can I get that
right that was my point is I guess
sales experience well we're gonna get
to that to the halftime walk that's kind of
the walk is great and then we watch it
on my TV in like
you know crisp blu-ray or
4k you know but still you know and
I'm like, no,
I mean,
that wasn't,
that was good.
Yeah.
But like you forget,
like it only really truly works in the proper.
And it did.
It felt,
it feels like you're in his head for that sequence.
Right.
And it was astonishing.
And at the end again,
the,
the sort of the,
the final montage he has during the fight.
Although.
Some of the wartime sequences,
him in the pipe with the guy in Vin Diesel,
that's an excellent scene.
And even the shit like the pink mist,
I just remember being like, oh, this actually
feels like what I imagine it would
look like to be on the battlefield.
It doesn't look like a movie version of war. This looks like
actual violence. But then there are scenes
like the scene where Billy Lynn
in Flashback is doing pull-ups,
chin-ups, and-ups and Vin Diesel
and Garrett Hedlund's characters are talking to him yeah they're all standing nowhere near each
other right and they're having this kind of casual conversation but it looks like a stage
play or something like the way they've all been arranged and then none of them ever move because
it's for the sake of 3D exactly and you're just watching and you're like, this is fucking stupid. Like, they're not people.
Like, sorry, Ben.
And it's, you lose the whatever human drama
he's like built ahead of steam.
Like, it just sort of like dissipates really fast.
And they're even just like narrative issues.
Like, the whole running thing with them getting in troubles
with like the stage hands at the concert
where they're in the wrong place at the wrong time.
It varies.
Like, you're like, why are they yelling at them?
Why are they being mean? These are veterans.
This is like a halftime show.
There's so much security. There's so much play
at this event. Destiny's Child is playing
and they're going like, so here's
what you're going to do and giving them the directions
30 seconds before they go onto the field.
You haven't worked this out before? Stuff like that where you just go
like, it seems very uncharacteristic
for Ang Lee to put that
much that little
thought into the
internal logic of
human situations.
Right.
Or the thing with
the stage where the
you know the techs
get like so mad at
them and then decide
to fight them after
the game.
Right.
That they're just
waiting in the alleyway.
They would never let
that happen.
No one would ever
think like let me
attack these famous
war veterans.
One because it's
shameful. Two because because it's shameful.
Two, because they'll kill you.
They're murderers.
And also, the first half of the movie, they have Ben Platt with them constantly as their handler,
guiding them through everything.
And then he conveniently disappears for all the scenes where people are trying to fight them.
Right.
And then, I'm just sorry.
This is the thing.
And then it's like, when you just sort of dig into the movie, you're like, none of this holds water.
It's so frustrating.
Right.
And I love the idea of that. I iraq war movies are hard to make we kind of talked about it on um uh hurt
locker even though it's under you know middle east you know war on terror movies yeah uh this this is
kind of almost there to a good iraq war movie like the ideas are good the you know the the sort of
like total fallacy bush era kind of like America like yeah we're still out there
doing like I like that montage
watching this movie makes me want to read the book so fucking hard
the book's better right like of all the people
talking to him where it cuts like to all the sort of
like stock phrases we all remember
yes from that era I think the combat scenes
are good yeah in conveying
like I think they're really good just sort of the uselessness
of it I love that thing
where yeah where the guy he murders,
his hand goes up for a second like he's saying a prayer or something to himself
because he knows he's about to die.
And then the red below him is great.
But it's fascinating.
As much as we say it kind of pulls the curtain back on performances
and lets you see the process,
the moment when he's stabbing the guy in the tube,
you feel like you see life leaving this guy's eyes.
Right.
And it's bizarre.
Yes, yes.
Because it feels more real than anything you've ever seen.
And then the way the blood slowly trickles out, it no longer feels like a visual effect.
It feels like, holy shit, this is what it looks like to watch someone die.
Like, you feel like you're watching a snuff film for a moment.
And so there are these glimpses where it feels like the technology is totally lining up with
the storytelling. They are largely the nonverbal moments. Right. And so there are these glimpses where it feels like the technology is totally lining up with the storytelling.
They are largely the nonverbal moments.
Right.
You know, because I just think the script isn't there.
And the dialogue scenes, the performances just aren't massaged enough.
The dramatic sort of logic of the thing isn't totally figured out.
But there are these moments that completely justify the film existing.
As if it didn't already justify its own existence just from the bravery of the
experiment which in and of itself is just this amazing like we're going to the moon in 1918
you know like we don't even know how to get to like Missouri yet and you're going to the moon
like that's what it feels like yeah yeah just like this will go down in the history book someday as
something whether anyone ever figured out how to do this,
it becomes this amazing chapter in filmmaking history.
Which is, I think that's the important thing to me,
is I just don't want this film to be dismissed and forgotten because I do think it is Ang Lee, John Toll,
the whole crew that made this.
Vin Diesel.
Taking these pretty brave, courageous steps
to try this thing.
And we don't see a lot of big filmmakers
spending a lot of money
to take these big swings that may or may not work.
It's like, to me, it's the epitome
of what a blank check is.
It's like, I'm going to cash in
all of my history as a filmmaker
to do something that I think will
at least push film ahead,
even if it doesn't help me right now.
There is weirdly something kind of
selfless about it in that regard
where it's like I'm going to use my cachet
to try to make the advancements that no one else can
make. JD changed my
opinion today
okay because
I like watching movies because I like
stories and I like kind of
leaving my own reality
and being absorbed. Seeing people who have a home to live in.
But I will say that I've also always been like,
fuck this Blu-ray bullshit.
I don't care.
I've never cared.
I've never, ever cared.
The technological aspects.
Because I always was like,
is it really that much of a difference?
I always get SD.
It is also annoying that you always get SD.
I've never given a shit ever.
I get it.
You watch VHS when possible.
Absolutely.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I prefer it.
Yeah.
But you have opened my eyes to the idea of experiencing a film and being more immersed
through the visual.
And I never really, I was always just like, I care about the story,
the characters,
the dialogue.
I don't really,
I'm not thinking about
what it looks like,
but it makes a difference.
And what perfect timing
as we go into our
parent trap episode?
Yeah.
Well,
I think it takes,
Christmas visuals of all.
It takes filmmakers
appreciating and respecting
the fact that
they need to use
an interesting way
to make it worthwhile.
A great example is like
the early stereoscopic films
of this modern generation.
I really didn't like...
What are we talking about here?
What do we got?
I mean, whatever the first ones that come out
in stereoscopic.
Like early, I'm trying to remember.
I guess like some of the Marvel movies did.
I mean, I'm trying to think what were...
Journey to the Center of the Earth.
The Robert Rodriguez did the couple.
But the first one,
and you called me and
Griffin stupid animation
animation nerds for this
Coraline was the first one
where I felt a movie the
that Henry Selleck was
respecting the medium and
trying to do something
interesting that was using
it in a way that was
engaging me as an audience
he did stuff where yeah I
love how he had he had
sets that were purposely
really deep and sets that
were used visual physical effects to make them really shallow that the 3D was really messing with your eyes.
He's literally using depth as like a storytelling element very consciously designed into like the body of the film rather than just being like let's have things staggered in the image.
And that was the first time that I went, oh, this is actually an interesting tool to be used in film.
Yeah.
Similarly, where it's like I have the same thing.
It's like I couldn't give a shit.
We were just talking about TVs before now,
and I don't have a good TV or a good audio system.
I don't care.
I like the stories like you.
But then when people start trying things
that are interesting and are trying to push the format,
that's when I have to open my eyes and respect that.
Because that's when it's interesting again,
is when Ang Lee is going,
hey, let's try this thing and try to use it for art,
not just to make the ticket
10 bucks more expensive or
to release it in another DVD version.
And I'll say a thing that I think I said
on that episode. I will repeat, despite
it making me look like an idiot because I wasn't as
smart and ahead of the curve as you guys were at
the time, but I remember
walking out of Speed Racer with my sister.
She said, what did you think? And I said,
I don't even know because what they're doing with the visual language
is so different and beyond what anyone's doing
that either this will totally make sense in 10 years
or it will be this weird curio
of someone trying something crazy.
And Speed Racer's an example
where it's not like every movie looks like Speed Racer,
but a lot of the elements of Speed Racer
have seeped into our general sort of storytelling language
where that movie makes more sense now. Yeah. Yeah, it's true. Speed Racer's great. Speed Racer have seeped into our general storytelling language where that movie makes more sense now.
That's true.
Speed Racer's great. Speed Racer fucking rules.
It's wild.
How are you guys doing?
I'm doing great.
We all just went quiet all of a sudden.
I know, it's just a lot of the process.
I love you.
That's the thing in the movie.
What? Vin Diesel.
Oh, I love that.
I love that too I love you.
I love that too,
but it just kind of happens.
Yeah.
And then it happens again
and the movie's like,
like you did before
and you're like,
yeah, okay, I guess so.
I thought we were just having
a nice moment on the podcast.
No, I do love you.
I love you so much.
But I was,
well, I was just, you know.
I think male intimacy
is like not a thing
that really gets represented.
I'm a pretty intimate guy.
Yeah, don't get me started.
Now you're complaining.
Yeah, a little too intimate.
See, I feel like...
You went 180 on male intimacy.
I was trying to catch you.
Honey trap, baby.
I feel like my goal is...
Oh, no.
Go on, JD.
JD, what's your goal?
Pulling out another envelope.
Why is he called Shroom?
What the fuck
Griffin will try to honey trap David
he's tripping
yeah probably yeah cause he's all trippy
he's like spiritual
that was
the most half hearted baby
I wish this was the best performance of all time
you just want Vin Diesel to be so good in this movie
and you know what he is
fine yeah pretty good in 120 movie. And you know what he is? Fine. Yeah, pretty good.
In 120 frames, I think he's actively bad.
Right.
You see behind all the smoke and mirrors.
If you watch it in 24, you're like, he's okay.
Yeah.
He's okay.
I agree.
But yeah, it's very odd.
Watching it in the high frame rate, you were like,
I see that Vin Diesel is very consciously playing his best angles to the camera.
Well, so here's a few of my favorite moments in the movie.
One is there is a scene where they're in a limo,
which to get the camera into the limo,
they had to disassemble the camera,
bring all the pieces in one by one,
and then reassemble it in the limousine.
So it's like when you can't get your sofa
through the door of your house,
the guy has to take your sofa.
Yeah, Dr. Sofa.
And this shot when they like- He came to my house with them. You cut to inside the your sofa. Dr. Sofa. And this shot, when they like,
you cut to inside the limo.
This is when like,
eight minutes into the movie,
everyone in the theater
takes their glasses off
for a moment
and like,
rubs their temples.
Because you're seeing
everyone in this limo
and they're all in focus
and then in the back corner,
there's a window
where you're seeing
people tailgating
and they're all totally in focus
and normally,
you wouldn't see them
and they wouldn't be in focus
and there'd just be
these blurry background actors
and instead you're like,
that background actor's
drinking a cup
but there's nothing in it.
That guy's throwing a football
to nobody.
You're noticing things
that you would notice in reality.
What's the African
are the seats made out of?
Where you can see
the whole stadium.
What stadium was this shot at?
Dallas.
So it was shot at the stadium. Yeah. That's crazy. I'm pretty certain. That must have been fucking so complicated. Yeah. What stadium was this shot at? Dallas. So it was shot at the stadium.
Yeah.
That's crazy.
I'm pretty certain.
That must have been so complicated.
Yeah, well, and it's also impossible to light a giant stadium like that.
Yeah, that's what I'm saying.
It's like the worst environment.
And half of this movie is them sitting in the stands,
like them just sitting in the middle of the crowd,
and you see everything behind them.
They CG'd some of the audience in.
I have to imagine.
Imagine how hard that would be.
120 frames per second where any
error in reality is
so noticeable. Yeah. God.
The fact that, you know,
the book is supposedly so
acidic and satirical, right?
And it's the contrast between Billy Lynn, who's a
man of few words, and his sort of internal monologue
and calling out the hypocrisy of everything around him.
The Garrett Hedlund character, who we said is the character that comes off the best, the best performance in the movie, doesn't exist in the book, if I'm not mistaken, and was created to have another character verbalize everything Billy Lynn was thinking.
Which is also the reason why he's the only engaging character to walk, because it feels like he's the character speaking honestly.
And it gets to a point where you're like, is there
going to be a twist where he's a ghost or something?
Because he's so forthright. Because he's just
like forthrightness and Billy Lynn is just
internalized like quiet and you're like
well this kind of hurts Billy
Lynn that he like
isn't able to say anything. Billy Lynn is just, he just looks like
a lamb. He's just got those shimmering eyes.
I think Joe Alwyn might be a good actor.
I just saw him in Operation Finale. He's good in that.
I feel like he's got promise.
He has a big year this year.
It's a lot of face in this movie.
I just wonder if,
especially with this technology,
if the movie would honestly work better
more focused on
close-ups of Joe Alwyn
with voiceover over them.
That might work
better if they literally just
kept his internal monologue and you're just watching
these close ups and looking into his eyes and all of that.
It might be weird, but also this doesn't work.
Two other things I want to point out before we
stop talking about this movie and never talk about it again.
Here's the plot. They take a walk.
Never stop talking about Billy Lynn's long hair.
Two things. One. What's an annual tradition?
Talking the walk 2018. We're going to do it every year like the Blanky hair. Two things. One. What's an annual tradition? Talking the walk 2018.
We're going to do it every year like the Blankie Awards.
Definitely not.
His sister, Catherine.
Yes.
They play their scene together with this uncomfortable intimacy.
It feels like they want to fuck.
Right.
And of course, part of the idea of Billy's character is that he's a virgin.
Right.
And that crazy thing where we literally send people off to die in Iraq
and they've never had sex
but they can kill people.
Which is one thing
I think Ang Lee does
really fucking well
in this movie
is casting really,
really young looking actors
for the whole squadron
to kind of sell home
the reality of like,
oh, these are kids.
Arturo Castro
from Broad City.
Baby face.
Yeah, baby face.
So that's weird.
Two,
that scene at the press conference where two times
the screen grays out and they like say the real answer and then they you hear them say the fake
answer and like you can't do that twice and never again yeah that can be a thematic device or you
don't do it don't do it like twice it just seems weird technique like he wants to show reality
versus fantasy but doing it any other way would break the technology yeah so just fucking take that out yeah it's
basically a masturbation joke i almost feel like this technology means you have to also follow like
the dogma 95 rules like oh like it's just there's a manifesto you have to subscribe to well literally
the dogma rules where it's like no sets, no lighting.
Maybe not all handheld.
But like all the things. Because anything that feels
non-real. Maybe you should
have a podcast that watches every Dogma
95 movie.
And talks about all the rules that got broken. There's only one though, right?
Did Kevin Smith ever make a Dogma 95?
Oh no.
That was 99, not 95.
Boo.
Your IMDB star meter just went down Oh my god
Wait can I
There are 35 dog movies
That's a good little mini series
I found something that made me laugh really hard
Chidi is wearing a blank check shirt
He's a good boy
Wait can I borrow your computer for a second David
Oh you fucking jerk. Why?
Because I have a segment I want to do now.
Let him do it. I'll do a merchandise spotlight.
Let me do a segment
because I learned something recently
and I think you guys will appreciate it.
Wait, vamp while I get this set up.
Don't like getting my computer taken from me.
Merchandise spotlight.
Football.
Still America's favorite sport never done anything
wrong
no controversies
is there any
merchandise
for this
no
no
what's the fictional
team in the movie
because they can't
use
I think they just
say Dallas
I don't think
they ever call
them a name
that would be a
great piece of
ephemera
like a fake
a fake jersey
Philly land jersey
yeah
locking into
IMDB pro right now.
Wait, it's very funny.
Holy shit.
I'm going to check my star meter.
I mean, if you stay logged in,
I'll happily use your IMDb Pro account.
Sure, you can use it if you want.
You know those like Temple Run,
those like mobile games
where you're like trying to run
and collect all the things
and not fall in a pitfall.
They should have made one of those
that's like a halftime walk
and you're just very slow.
Try to make it all the way
without being discussed. Hey guys rachel tried to get uh dan uh vogler to to be on the show dan vogler from like
star taking woodstock yeah his email is what are you doing i won't say i'll bleep it It's Does she know him or something
Yeah she did a podcast with him
He has a podcast
Is he going to be on the show
Maybe
I'll say this that is one of the better email addresses I've ever had
Truly one of the better email addresses I've ever had
That was a good vamp
Great vamp
Ready for JD's segment.
I noticed this the other day
and it really made me laugh.
This is the IMDB star meter
report with JD Amato.
IMDB has a thing called a star meter
which they randomly assign
a number to someone.
It's like how many times you've been
searched, right? That kind of stuff.
I don't really know.
There's some algorithm.
it's like how many times you've been searched right that kind of stuff I don't really know
there's some algorithm
I know I know
okay Ben bleep everything that's happened in the last
90 seconds just one straight long
bleep and it ends now
IMDB has
IMDB has the star meter
where it ranks people
everyone that's on IMDB but on the star meter where it ranks people. Everyone that's on IMDB.
But on the star meter page,
it has four categories.
The star meter,
how much they've moved up or down.
And then inexplicably,
it has age and height.
And you can categorize...
It's not inexplicable.
I can tell you why they have that,
but carry on.
You can categorize everybody
by both age and height. Yes, it's for casting purposes. Yeah have that, but carry on. You can categorize everybody by both age and height.
Yes, it's for casting purposes.
Yes, I understand why you would have someone's age and height there,
but you can rank everybody in IMDb based on their age or height.
Are you going to see other 29-year-old 5'6 actors
and how I rank against them?
No, he's going to find the shortest and tallest actors.
I want to check in on, according to IMDb,
who the youngest, the shortest, and the tallest actors are. want to check in on, according to IMDb, who the youngest,
the shortest, and the tallest actors are.
What about oldest? Right now,
Ronan Willingham is the youngest actor at age
zero. Well, that's no point.
Zero? Give me his credits.
Jackson Roloff from
Little People, Big World is
up there at one years old,
as is Aria Dixon,
Fiona from the NBC Nightly News
at Lester Hall.
We're cutting this.
We're cutting this fucking segment.
But then here's the best part.
Here's where it gets wild.
You have height,
so at half an inch...
You already read.
Half an inch?
What are you talking about?
Is it a fucking sea monkey?
Half an inch is a guy named Keon.
Impossible.
But here's the real kicker.
A clerical error.
Here's the thing that's so funny.
He's like a fucking caterpillar or something.
Who do you think the tallest actor,
who is the tallest actor according to IMDb,
the tallest actor in cinema history?
Groot.
Keiko the whale.
Oh!
How tall? How tall?
24 feet.
Which means to me,
they're measuring Keiko's height
as if Keiko were standing
with a finned nose.
Yes.
Number two is Topsy the elephant.
Larger than life?
Operation Double Drop?
No, from the film from the fucking...
Oh, the one that gets electrocuted?
The elephant that...
Einstein?
Jesus Christ.
But take a look at the laptop back.
You already read a five-page manifesto.
I'm going to log out of my MDD Pro.
No, no, no, no.
Let me use your MDD Pro.
Why do you want it?
Because it's so useful for me.
Just don't do anything weird for me.
No, no, no.
It's just so I can see publicist's phone numbers, you know, so I can say like, hey, I want to
interview Topsy the Elephant.
He's long dead, David.
I don't know.
I don't know.
How funny is it that Kako the...
IMDb is like, here's who's hot and here's who's tall.
I want Topsy the Elephant.
That's his only credit, right?
Yes, yes.
He was kind of one and done.
We're going to play the box office.
Keiko the Whale.
Why does IMDb have that?
Keiko the Whale had a few credits too, right?
Like, I mean, there's at least three Free Willies.
I think he didn't do all the Free Willies though.
I think he did some, like, he might have been in, like,
Mary Kay and Ashley Mysteries at SeaWorld or something like that.
They Jason Bourned him, yeah.
They Jason Bourned.
Yeah, you forget that Renner played Free Willy in the third one.
Pierce Brosnan jumped in at a certain point.
Do we want to do
the...
I think the
weekend it went wide.
It's one weekend later.
So then pick either weekend.
I'm trying to see...
Maybe don't get so fucking mad.
Look, whichever one we don't do now,
we'll save for a talk in the Walk 2019.
Oh, wait, what?
Ding dong.
Ding dong.
Hey, kid.
I'm back.
Oh, my God.
It's like one shitty blockbuster.
We're doing the weekend it opens. You can actually do yours. We're doing the weekend it opens.
You can actually do yours.
Why is Ronald McDonald holding a paper SS Georgie?
Okay, we're doing the weekend that it first came out.
I think Ben wanted to do an actual ad there.
It's okay.
No, we're not doing an actual ad.
It's a marker.
Well, no.
It's one for later, but it's fine.
Here you are.
Ding dong.
Now you can actually do it.
Ah, the movies. Are you can actually do it. The movies.
Are you Orson Welles right now?
They help us escape our world with a list of actors, extravagant set pieces, and witty dialogue.
But what?
Record scratch?
About the music?
Oh, are you talking about the soundtrack show?
Yes.
The podcast that breaks down the music in your favorite movies while giving a bit of history around the film and its impact in today's pop culture and like the best french
wines it's hosted by david w collins a veteran voice actor and composer with over 20 years of
experience and entertainment but yeah don't just call him a critic he's an entertainment professional
he loves pop culture and he reveals behind thescenes info on your favorite flicks and reveals how music makes them so memorable.
So, like, you got, like, Spielberg didn't want Alan Silvestri to work on Back to the Future at first, and Silvestri spent most of the production winning him over.
Yeah, and, like, the best French wine, Princess Leia.
Oh, boy.
We lost Griffin.
oh boy we lost griffin yes and like the best french wines princess leia's theme in star wars is more romantic than the others that makes you care for her characters if she represents the good
in the galaxy worth fighting for uh yeah and part of what makes the infamous shower scene in psycho
work is because the score makes you physically uncomfortable and And like the best... Look, you can listen to Soundtrack Show every Wednesday
on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Google Podcasts,
wherever else you get your podcasts.
You'll never listen to movies the same way again.
And like the best French wines,
all of the music surrounding gameplay
in Super Mario Bros. only lasts five minutes.
Aha!
And we're back, kids.
Okay, box office.
Remember, go to McDonald's,
promo code blank,
and say Jack in my Mac.
Be quiet.
Be quiet.
You guys are in person now.
Billy Lynn's long halftime walk.
Don't use one of the kiosks.
It's got to be person to person.
Communication. It's got to be person to person communication.
It was in theaters.
Billy Lynn's Long Halftime Walk was in theaters
for five weeks.
Total.
It was on two screens in its first week.
That was New York and LA.
Correct. It then expanded to
1,100 screens.
Was in those for the two minimum weeks
that are required by exhibitors, essentially.
Yeah.
Then lost all its screens,
went to 75, 16,
and then vanished from theaters.
It's one of the biggest single weekend theater drops.
Do you know they released the film
in 24 different versions?
No.
I don't know what that means.
What do you mean?
Between stereoscopic 3D, 2K, 4K.
Right.
Different 3D versions.
Like 24 different versions.
Found domestic totals a million and a half.
1.7 million dollars.
But it does make 30 worldwide.
Yeah.
The studio is estimated to have lost about 40 million dollars.
But like outgrossed by like two of the three father's
nose yes it's outgrossed by every angley movie except for pushing hands and ride with the devil
those are the only two right that never cracked a million yes um so number one on november 11th
2016 i reviewed this film by the way you can read my review it's not bad it's on the atlantic.com
um number one is a Marvel movie. Doctor Strange.
Yes.
So this is the weekend when Donald Trump has just been elected president.
Jesus.
Like, it's a rough weekend.
Oh, I forgot.
Yeah.
So this is second.
Pretty much.
This is second weekend of Doctor Strange.
Correct.
Where my mother and I were visiting my great aunt and uncle at a retirement home in Florida.
Sounds like a great place to be.
The weekend after Trump had been elected
and we were losing our minds
and we were like,
let's walk to the closest
movie theater
and see Doctor Strange,
which my mom has seen
zero previous Marvel movies.
And even she was like,
they're all kind of the same,
right?
That was her first Marvel movie?
No, you know what?
I think she saw,
weirdly,
I think the only two
she had seen were
Iron Man 2
and The Avengers.
Sure.
And she didn't like
either of them
and then she saw this
and was like,
yeah, they're all
kind of the same,
aren't they?
Kind of are.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Anyway,
Doctor Strange
and Second Weekend.
Big hit.
People underrate
for like a solo
first Marvel film.
That's maybe the biggest
of the first,
other than the first Iron Man.
I guess so
I mean 232
pretty solid
yeah
it did well
yeah cause the other first
entries usually do around
180
and it's that weird thing
where we're obviously
gonna get another one
but they won't say
what the future movies
in Marvel are right now
cause they don't wanna
quote unquote
spoil Avengers 4
I think they knew
I guess how big a part
he'd be in Infinity War
so it wasn't
as much of a problem
I love that he uses
the Crimson Bands
of Citrax.
I mean, I like them.
I think he's a cool guy.
It's a fun movie.
That's another movie
that is actually
infinitely better in 3D.
That actually uses 3D
really well.
It looked cool in 3D.
The visual effects
are really special.
Because they do a lot
of portal dimensional
stuff like that.
It uses depth
in a very similar way
to Coraline.
Number two is a film
written and directed
by past and future guest
Richard Lawson.
Trolls.
It is his Trolls.
Which in its second weekend
has made $93 million.
And at that point
had made $4 billion
in merchandising.
Correct.
That was DreamWorks'
attempt to do cars
and just be like,
what's a thing we can put
on everything and make
It was a film about
how you couldn't
stop the feeling.
I listened to that song
unironically.
America was trying really hard.
That's a real JD Amato statement.
Is that like a pump-up song for you
or is that like a chill-down song for you?
During dark times,
I'll sometimes listen to it
to get into a good mood.
Cool.
When you're trying to kickstart the feeling
and it won't start.
Yeah.
You just can't stop that feeling to start it.
Whatever.
Okay, number three at the box office.
It's a new film.
Well, not new. New at Okay. Number three at the box office. It's a new film. Well, not new.
New at the time.
New at the time.
I mean, this is a couple years.
One of the best picture nominees of this year.
Oh.
A great film.
One of my favorites of 2016.
And kind of like a genuine and heartwarming hit for this kind of movie.
Yes.
This was a surprising opening weekend for Arrival.
Arrival, which made $100 million total, $200 million worldwide.
I remember people hypothesizing at the time if the Trump election had helped boost the film
with its message of struggling to communicate.
It's a great movie.
And now I think it's just like it was a good movie.
I don't think it had any political power.
It's a great movie, though. Can I say something just like it was a good movie. I don't think it had any political. Probably. It's a great movie, though.
Can I say something about the box office game that I just want to admit?
Is that every time I listen to you do it,
there's a part of me that thinks that you've cheated beforehand.
And that on the way here, you took a look at it.
We talked it through or whatever.
No, just that Griffin has.
You think I've memorized it in advance.
But I will say, anytime I'm here in person,
and I see you drawing from your memory,
I can tell that it is real.
And even if you did cheat, I wouldn't want to test it.
I wouldn't want to know.
You're in the world of magic.
You're wondering if I'm using some mentalist tricks or whatever.
But you're saying at the very least I'm selling it well in person.
I'm saying, for the listeners, there's a part of me that was skeptical.
Yeah.
I believe you're legit. I do find we have that
when people are in the studio
could you film it
at 120 frames
yeah then we just
figure out if I'm lying
or not
the truth teller
okay number four
at the box
um
it's a Christmas movie
it's a Christmas movie
here's the tagline for it
five days together
oh joy I just I definitely know that Joe Reed saw this movie here's the tagline for it. Five days together. Oh, joy.
Five days together.
Oh, joy.
I definitely know that Joe Reed saw this movie in the theaters, like,
within days of Trump's election.
Love the Coopers?
No.
That's a good guess, though.
Good guess.
That is a good guess.
Is it ensemble picture like that, or is it like a star-
It's an ensemble.
Does it have, like, a top line?
Does it have, like, a real major major star or is it really just truly an
ensemble picture? It's a real ensemble picture.
Yeah.
The cast is
listed in alphabetical
order on the poster. There's
11 names here.
Was it Almost Christmas?
Almost Christmas.
I get that confused with This Christmas.
I don't know any of these. There's a lot of movies with these sort of generic
bland titles. Almost Christmas. It has
Bad Zoo Boy in it though. Look.
Look. There he is.
Bad Zoo Boy, John Michael Higgins. And on the poster he's kind of
going like,
No zoo for you.
He's kind of got his arms crossed. The Zoop Nazi.
John Michael Higgins fan.
Yeah. They all are.
Who is first? is that an alphabetical
Kimberly Elise's first build
with her E
right
and then you got
Omar Epps
Danny Glover
yeah
John Michael Higgins
Romany Malco
and Monique
Monique
Nicole Harry Parker
yeah there's a second line baby
JB Smoove
Gabrielle Union
Jesse T. Usher
DC Youngfly
DC Youngfly I DC Youngfly?
I don't really know who that is.
I know the rest of them.
He is an
American rapper, actor, comedian, and singer.
Well, hey, that's a lot of stuff.
Number five at the box office?
You don't want me to talk more about Almost Christmas?
Because we haven't seen it.
I do like the dynamic between David sometimes being like,
come on, let's get through it.
And then sometimes you're like,
you know what?
I'm just going to settle in.
Sometimes he really sits.
I like how this feels.
I like this chair.
Number five is another of the year's best picture nominees.
And one of those best picture nominees that people will probably struggle
to recall in future years.
And you know,
it's a movie that actually didn't do that well.
Interesting.
This is its opening weekend or is this a wider expansion?
No, it's been out for two weeks.
I feel like you've never seen this movie.
It's a genre you hate.
Oh, no, I have seen it because you kept on telling me to not see it.
This also got a Best Director and Best Actor nomination.
Correct.
It is called, fuck, Hacksaw Ridge.
Hacksaw Ridge.
It was sort of a hit.
It made 67.
But, like, I remember the buzz was kind of like a real comeback for Mel Gibson. It was sort of a hit. It made 67. But like,
I remember the buzz was kind of like
a real comeback
for Mel Gibson.
It's like, well,
it did fine.
Yeah.
It is insane
that he got a Best Director
nomination for that.
That's the most egregious thing.
Two years ago.
Yep.
That's when that happened.
He's got to be done though.
No, he just made a movie
about police brutality
with Vince Vaughn.
He didn't direct it.
He's just the star of it.
It's called Dragged Along Concrete. Yeah yeah i wonder what the politics are on that one
oh boy oh boy uh we've got the accountant one of those like sleeper massive hits yeah huge
uh terrible accountant fever i never saw uh shut in what is shut In? It's the one where Naomi Watts is shut in somewhere.
She's stuck.
Oliver Platt.
I don't know.
I never saw it.
What else have we got here?
We've got Boo and Madea Halloween.
Jack Reacher Never Go Back.
Sorry, you just scared me for a second.
You know, I just remember like so many of these movies,
it was that thing where Trump had just gotten elected
and you're just like,
even like looking at a poster for Boo and just gotten elected and you're just like even like looking at a
poster for
Bua Medea Halloween
you're just like
everything's changed now.
Yeah.
Inferno.
Inferno.
There's an ad for Inferno
on my Billy Lynn DVD.
Really?
Yeah.
And I was like
Ben Foster?
And then I just
skipped ahead.
I forgot he's in that.
Wait it has like
pre-roll DVDs?
Pre-roll ads?
Yeah isn't that weird?
That's very 1990s.
Disney's usually the only one that still does that.
We're unlocking the vault.
Yeah.
And then the next week is Fantastic Beasts.
But I picked the week before.
Fuck Fantastic Beasts.
Okay, Beasts.
Yeah, exactly.
We're like fine beasts.
Well, there's only one.
Another one's coming this year.
Okay, Beasts, if you can be bothered
I liked all the
Harry Potter movies
and then I saw those
and I was like
I don't think they're gonna
scratch quite the same itch
so I'm just not gonna do it
nope
no they don't
they don't scratch
that's probably
a great way to define
what's wrong with those movies
they don't really
scratch that itch
so then I was like
I'm just not gonna do it
and I'll just have
enjoyed the Harry Potter movies
I've said this before
but like the color palette
of that film is limestone
it's like the strangest
decision ever made
because it's a very
well designed movie
it's a well designed movie
with a lot of clever
visual ideas
but then also
they're like
but every building
should be white
it looks really
fucking boring
when they pitched it
when it was first announced
I was like
I like the idea
of doing a Harry Potter movie
that is not
like living in
the mythology
right and it's not about the boy who lived movie that is not living in the mythology.
Right, and it's not about the boy who lived.
It's not part of this epic hero. It's like Gremlins are small soldiers.
It's like he's got a suitcase and the things fall out
and he's got to capture them all.
It's Harry Potter Pokemon.
And then the movie is so much about Wizard Hitler.
It's so deep in the mythology.
That's the problem.
I bet you wonder what the other countries were like.
It's like, not really.
What do they got, wizards? Well, yes, actually. It's like New like and it's like not really like what do they got wizards?
well yes actually
and it looks a lot like wizard London
very similar
but Dan Fogler's there
Dan Fogler
you have to bleep it out again
Dan Fogler probably is the best performance
in that movie right?
that's the most effective character
it's also an a**
you have to bleep that out too
don't give many hints
maybe this will be
this is a legendary episode
we're going to have to do it again next year
same time next year
stop setting that up
2018 fans that is not happening I want to be clear We're going to have to do it again next year. Same time next year. Talking the Walk. Stop setting that up. Talking the Walk 2018.
Fans, that is not happening.
I want to be clear.
At the end of every year's Talking the Walk,
we plan next year's Talking the Walk.
Maybe it's like a premium episode.
Possibly.
Hold on.
I'm emailing Joe Bowen right now to design our
I Talked the Walk 2018 show.
No, what it's got to be now,
it's got to be I Talked the Walk
and it's got to be a pizza.
With every other slice missing.
A spinning pizza, yeah.
Oh, David, it's me, Griffin in the present tense.
Thinking back on that episode we recorded a couple weeks ago.
A great episode.
Oh, remember when we made the joke about the I Talk The Walk
t-shirts? Sure, it was an idle
joke. One of our famed tangents.
I'm going to get deathly serious
now. We made them and they're available
right now on TeePublic. You can
wear a shirt that announces to everyone proudly
that you talked the walk
in 2018. Why is the wind howling
so menacingly? You're setting a standard.
You're making a promise that you will continue to talk the walk every year and buy another
t-shirt and we'll all become billionaires.
There's a crow pecking at my eye.
Ben, get that crow away from your eye.
You need to see.
Go to tpublic.com.
Slash stores.
Buy.
Slash blank hyphen check.
Buy your I Talk the Walk 2018 t-shirt because you're going to feel embarrassed
if you don't get in
the ground floor
and you don't have
a complete collection
10 years from now.
I mean,
there's just one question.
I mean,
did you talk the walk
or not?
Right.
Did you or didn't you?
And here's a parallel question.
Are you a goddamn loser
or not?
Are you going to step
to the plate
and own your life?
Oh,
there's another question.
Ben,
remember when this promo
was going to be short?
My ears are bleeding.
And Ben,
here's one more question.
Who designed the t-shirt?
What?
Who designed the t-shirt,
Ben?
My father,
Robert.
Robert Haslund.
As if you need to hear
anything else.
So go buy your shirts now,
you losers.
Did you know Ben's dad
actually designed
the t-shirt, guys?
That's truly,
no jokes.
He texted us the other day
being like,
my dad's designing a logo.
It's a family affair here, Blank Check.
What a puke.
What if we
What if we
end this episode? I agree. No, what if we make
good out of this and make an annual
this is not a joke,
an annual Billy Lynn themed
charity walk for Blankies.
What if we use it as a force for good in the world? We weaponize our fan base and you do the annual Billy Lynn themed charity walk for blankies? What if we like use it as like a force for good in the world?
We weaponize our fan base and you do the annual Billy Lynn podcast walk to
raise money for herniated discs and backs of actors closely.
Cut all that out,
Ben.
Just cut it out.
Okay.
Great.
I talked about 2018.
But I do think
I feel like JD comes into every episode where he's like
I'm gonna coin a new fucking catchphrase
for this show if I
live to regret it
talk the walk 2018
t-shirt is I talk the walk with a pizza
with a couple slices missing
spinning motion line
I didn't do one of my
patented sub podcast this episode oh I guess not didn't do one of my patented sub-podcasts this episode.
Oh, I guess not.
Oh, that's true.
You want to do one now?
Hey, guys.
J.D. Amato here.
Just jumping in for a quick second.
I didn't actually have anything to say,
but because I set it up in the episode,
Ben said that I had to put something in.
So I guess I'll just say this.
If I got any of the tech or physics stuff wrong this episode,
I'm sorry.
I tried my best.
Also, I'm sorry we didn't really talk about the plot of the movie.
Anyways, we'll do better next year
talking The Walk 2019
now back to the show
and we're back
run time
two hours
24 minutes
people
let's kill it
and we didn't even go
over the plot of the movie
at all
to be fair
when we bleep out
Dan Folger's email address
the episode will be
one hour and two minutes
right correct
that's true
it's a very long email address I don't know how anyone ever writes it.
It's really long. Has Rachel just been trying
to type out the email address for weeks now?
From the moment they hired her.
Just finished. Wait.
Okay. Can I finish?
Here's the things
I want to get off my chest. He's getting the manifesto
out again.
He's taking out a second manifesto.
It's leather bound. Unlocking it with a key. I want's taking out a second manifesto. I just want to say. It's leather bound.
I want to.
Unlocking it with a key.
I want to shout out a couple people.
It was just an eldritch scream that came out of that thing.
Some fantastic beasts are crawling out.
Yeah.
A Niffler?
The table's turning to stone around it.
Go on.
What's up?
Dimitri Portelli, the stereographer and 3D supervisor
of the film,
needs a shout out.
Ben Gervais,
the production system supervisor.
Those are the two dudes
that did all the tech stuff
for this film.
And if you look up,
Sony has all these articles
about how it went down.
It was crazy.
3D is really good
in this movie.
Yes.
They used
other facts
that I want on the record.
They used true motion shutters,
which have the ability to have more than 360 degree shutter angle.
Now they understand a shutter.
How crazy is that?
It doesn't really, I don't really get what that even means.
JD's manifesto is sucking neighboring objects into it.
Like a portal.
It's on fire, but he can still touch it.
All right, that's most of all I wanted to say.
Well, we finally did it.
We got J.D. to be a little embarrassed.
J.D., are you right if I scan that
and make it a PDF available for people?
No, I'm not.
It's proprietary.
He's got to save something for next year.
Okay.
No, you can't have it. Wow. All right. I'll bring. It's proprietary. He's got to save something for next year. Okay. No, you can't have it.
Wow.
All right.
I'll bring in a manifesto,
and whatever I get into in the podcast is what we get into it,
and whatever we don't get into,
it's for Talking the Walk 2019,
and we get into it there.
It will be included in JD's archives
that are donated to a university when he dies.
I'll try to hop into the Reddit
to try to answer some questions.
Sure.
I got called out.
I went to watch you guys.
David did a Q&A.
Yeah, I went into the Discord to chat with fans.
And I was like,
I'll watch David answer questions.
And I didn't know how Discord worked.
I used it for video games.
Sure, yeah, yeah, yeah.
With like three friends. And so I went in and it was like, ding, J.D. Amato has arrived. And everyone was like, and I didn't know how Discord worked. I used it for video games. Sure, yeah, yeah, yeah. With like three friends.
And so I went in and it was like,
ding, JD Amato has arrived.
And everyone was like,
and I was like, no, no, no, I don't want this.
Stop looking at me.
And I was like, what's up, JD?
How you doing?
How do you think the Bulls are going to do this year?
You know, I like tried to talk to you
and you were like, I'm just lurking.
And then the other night,
I opened up Discord again
to play video games with friends
and it had me automatically logged in.
People were like, hey,
and I was like, oh God.
Goodbye.
Yeah. But I lurk on oh God. Goodbye. Yeah.
But I lurk on that thing.
After my last episode,
someone that I was in
the grade school performance
of West Side Story.
They gave you a good review.
That was the first
and only time
I was ever in a play.
Yeah.
Shout out to you, Taylor.
Well, you've been in
stage performances
at the UCB and stuff.
I guess it's not like a play.
You've never done.
Also, this is the one time I told you guys,
someone on the street was like,
oh, you're JD Amato from Blank Check.
So this is now my home.
That's your title.
On the street?
Oh, it was a friend of a friend.
Okay.
Still though.
Shout out to you.
Well, thank you all for listening.
Thank you for talking the walk.
JD, thank you for being here.
Congratulations on your entry into the Five Timers Club.
Thank you.
I also say, I don't need to,
I'm not in competition with Emily or Richard.
Those are people that should be on the podcast more than me.
They're actual film critics with actual interesting takes.
Hard to disagree.
Beyond getting into the technical stuff,
I don't really have hot takes on stuff.
No, I get you.
I get you.
You're the best in the biz. You're the best in the biz.
You're the best in the biz.
Here's what's up.
Emily, you, Richard,
you're actual critics
who I read your reviews
of things.
That's very nice, yeah.
No, but you belong
in the podcast
as much as anyone else,
you maniac.
Yeah.
Stop being a maniac,
you maniac.
I love movies
and I love this podcast
and I love you guys.
I love you too, Katie.
I love you too, David.
Blanket. Thank Katie. Blanket.
Thank you all for listening.
Thank you for taking the walk.
Thank you for listening to the Ang Lee miniseries.
Quite a long one.
Next week, we begin the run
of our March Madness champion,
Nancy the Juggernaut.
Later this week, a little
bonus episode.
Ang Lee's The Hire.
Or no, what was his called?
Right? The Hire was the whole series.
The BMW short series where they had like John...
No, Chosen.
Chosen was his. The Hire was the larger series.
We're going to do that.
And including that, our final summation thoughts on Ang Lee.
Thank you for listening.
Please remember to rate, review, subscribe.
Go to blankies.red.com
for some real nerdy shit.
Thanks to Andrew Fraguto
for our social media.
Thanks to Joe Bone
and Pat Reynolds
for our artwork.
Lane Montgomery
for our theme song.
And as always,
JD looks like he has
something to say.
Nothing.
Really?
Don't forget to hack my Mac.
I got my quote I'm gonna use there's a quote?
can this be titled
talk in the walk 2018
as if to imply that every year
will return
you're so obsessed with breaking our format
I think we should also
it implies that we will.
What if we make t-shirts...
Talk the Walk 2018.
What if we make t-shirts that said,
I talked the walk 2018
and it had some survived, you know?
Like it was...
Like fireworks, like the poster.
I talked the walk 2018
and it's got the silhouette of fake Beyonce.
Addressing her wig from behind. Put that's got the silhouette of fake Beyonce.
Addressing her wig from behind.
Put that all at the end of the episode.
We'll see what the response is.
This movie is so insane.
Okay, are you ready?
It is insane.
It's the best.
No, it isn't.
Yes, it is.
I will convince you by the end of this.