Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar - 11/13/24: Trump Taps Fox Host For SecDef, MAGA Revolt Over Rubio, Putin Ramps Up Offensive, Interview Live From Gaza, Socialist Runs For NYC Mayor

Episode Date: November 13, 2024

Ryan and Emily discuss Trump taps Fox Host for SecDef, MAGA revolt over Rubio pick, will Trump snub Tulsi, MAGA plots Senate takeover with Rick Scott, Putin ramps up offensive ahead of Trump White House, lights go out mid interview with Gaza journalist, socialist runs for Mayor of NYC.    To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com   Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is an iHeart Podcast. Taser Incorporated. I get right back there and it's bad. Listen to Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Clayton English. I'm Greg Glott. And this is Season 2 of the War on Drugs podcast. Last year, a lot of the problems of the drug war. This year, a lot of the biggest names in music and sports. This kind of star-studded a little bit, man.

We met them at their homes. We met them at their recording studios. Stories matter, and it brings a face to them. It makes it real. It really does. It makes it real. Listen to new episodes of the War on Drugs podcast season two on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

The OGs of uncensored motherhood are back and badder than ever. I'm Erica. And I'm Mila. And we're the hosts of the Good Moms Bad Choices podcast, brought to you by the Black Effect Podcast Network every Wednesday. Yeah, we're moms. But not your mommy. Historically, men talk too much.

And women have quietly listened. And all that stops here. If you like witty women, then this is your tribe. Listen to the Good Moms Bad Choices podcast every Wednesday on the Black Effect Podcast Network, the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you go to find your podcast.

Hey guys, Ready or Not 2024 is here, and we here at Breaking Points are already thinking of ways we can up our game for this critical election. We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade the studio, add staff, give you guys the best independent coverage that is possible. If you like what we're all about, it just means the absolute world to have your support. But enough with that. Let's get to the show. All right. Good morning and welcome to CounterPoints.

The neocons are on the march here, sacking the Trump administration, it looks like. It's 2004 again here in D.C. It really is. We're going to talk about Trump's personnel choices, who's in, who's out. Over on the Senate side, Republicans are going to pick a new leader. That's right. Mitch McConnell is the longest party leader in the history of the Senate. So they're voting on his replacement as we speak right now. So we'll have a full breakdown of that. Tons of interesting stuff to go through. And it looks like Vladimir Putin is trying to claw back as much territory from Ukraine in the Kursk region before Trump comes in and

tells him it's over. Potentially. Trump said it can't happen while I'm in there. No, he'll make a deal. Just gonna make a deal. So Putin's getting ahead of the deal. Yeah. So there is actually a lot of jockeying going on around the world awaiting Trump's swearing in on January 20th. And we're going to talk about this kind of joint North Korean Russian offensive that's underway. Yes. I mean, just incredibly important development in the history of this war. And Ryan, we have a guest who we'll be going over recent developments in Gaza with. Yeah, Dropsite contributor Abu Bakr Abed,

who was a sports journalist before October 7th, has kind of been forced into kind of wartime correspondent duty. Yesterday was the 30-day deadline that the State Department and the Defense Department had given to Israel to improve, to measurably improve specific metrics in Gaza or else face consequences to the tune of losing access to U.S. weapons. That deadline was yesterday. They met none of those metrics. Things have gone backwards. And we'll talk to Abu Bakr about what he has found and talk about his recent piece for

Dropside. And we'll also play some footage from yesterday's State Department briefing, which may be a new low for the State Department. Because they are the ones that sent this letter. They're the ones that set this deadline. They're the ones that set the metrics. And they're the ones that then have to pretend like they never did any of that. You're going to want to stick around for the footage from the briefing if you haven't seen it.

And all kinds of crazy political things going on in New York City, pretty usual, but actually it was even more interesting than usual. And so we have a mayoral candidate joining us. in that 20, it was either 2018 or 2020 that when there was that upsurge of kind of DSA candidates getting elected to the New York City Council and also the State Senate and State House. Now he's going to run for mayor on a sweeping progressive platform. That's exciting. Hey, we'll see what happens. Yes. Excited to talk to him. All right, let's start in our A block with new Trump appointments. Just an absolute flurry coming out from the Trump Vance press list last night. These announcements were like coming every 10 minutes. They're coming fascist and furious. Yeah. Damn it, Ryan. Let's start with Pete Hagseth.

So if you're not familiar with Pete Hagseth, he is a longtime Fox News contributor, which is probably where most people are familiar with him. And where Trump got to know him, no doubt, right? I'm sure that is where Trump got to know him, but he has been named the Secretary of Defense appointment. He's been named as Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense. And I actually got a little bit ahead of the curve saying he's been named Secretary of Defense because most of the time you can kind of assume that. I'm curious, genuinely, even with a Republican Senate, what happens with the Pete Hegseth nominee?

Because it was a full-blown freakout. Lobbyists were furiously texting Politico reporters, who the F is Pete Hegseth. You can imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth that was happening literally at the Pentagon when this announcement came out around, what, like 9 p.m. last night. Just sort of exploded, even for Trump. This was a quote that a lobbyist gave, and I actually, I think it's kind of funny. I mean, I agree with it, not in the way that the lobbyist does, but even for Trump, you're sort of grading on a curve with his weird appointments. This one sort of was surprising still, even in its weirdness. But before he was over at Fox, Pete Hegseth was, he's from Minnesota.

He went to Princeton undergrad, Harvard, Kennedy School for his master's. Trump loves those credentials. He really loves those credentials. Although Pete Hegseth says that he sent his Harvard degree back, he mailed it back to Harvard. And then he- Trump loves that even more. I'm sure Trump loves that. He enlisted and served in Iraq and Afghanistan. He has two bronze stars. He's decorated. And he went and worked with a group that both of us are pretty familiar with, which is the Concerned Veterans for America. He was the CEO of that group. So it's a pretty, I mean, it is a pretty unorthodox

pick. There's no question about that. And we'll talk more about him at the end of this block. He's kind of an America first guy, but also like a messianic kind of Israel supporter in a like over the top way. One of his top accomplishments previously in lobbying Trump was to talk him into pardoning Eddie Gallagher, who became this kind of hero on the right or for some elements of the right, but committed just straight up war crimes and became this kind of cause celeb. Because you try to find, some factions try to find the worst war criminal and then defend them to then expand the bounds of what's possible. And Hegseth was in on that and lobbying Trump on that pardon. Yeah, he was definitely lobbying Trump on the pardon.

Sager posted last night, he said, I know this about Pete Hegseth. On Ukraine, at least he's absolutely solid about ending the war. And I also know the Pentagon brass will absolutely lose it over his pick. They tried to nuke him in the first term, but it seems he may get the last laugh. That's an allusion to Trump attempting to nominate Hegseth for Veterans Affairs. Last time he was president and it just didn't work because exactly some of the reasons we're talking about, there was this institutional opposition or even like disgust to plucking someone from a News Corp studio in Manhattan and bringing them to an appointment in DC.

Now, that's why I'm genuinely curious what happens in the Senate with this nomination. There's a lot of, on the right, people are pretty damn happy about it because it's sort of sticking it to the Pentagon and saying, basically, screw your credentials. Screw your, I mean, obviously, he has the Ivy League pedigree, but screw your Jake Sullivan's. This guy, he might not talk like Jake Sullivan, but he has a better sort of on the ground understanding both of where the public is and where everyone else is and what happens if you're an actual combat veteran, et cetera, et cetera. That said, there's obviously concerns you could imagine like a Lindsey Graham having about the managerial task

of actually overseeing the Pentagon. Yeah, and also Lindsey Graham and he, Lindsey Graham's not really an America first, or he's, he loves every war, including the one in Ukraine and elsewhere. And so if Exit is going to be pushing back against some of those conflicts, even, even if he is kind of more militant when it comes to, say, Israel, or not more than Lindsey Graham when it comes to Israel, but equally so. It'll be interesting. Do you think that, how do you think recess appointments and the Senate are even going to factor in here? Because we'll know more by the end of this show, perhaps, when the Senate votes, Senate is voting this morning on who its leader

will be. Trump had said that he wants a leader who's going to allow recess appointments so he can breeze people through. That's his litmus test, yeah. We'll see how the Senate feels about that because that's the Senate sacrificing some of its power to the executive. What's your sense? Or will he just name acting people? I think he would gladly name acting people, and that's kind of the leverage he has over the Senate to confirm people. So yes, I mean, the Senate leader, I think, will probably acquiesce to recess appointments. But if you're Pentagon Secretary, you want a confirmed position because he's going to have

problems managing the Pentagon as it is. Right. It's a good point. And if he's not an officially confirmed member of the cabinet, then his enemies inside the bureaucracy will use that. Say, sorry, didn't CC you on that. Yeah. You're not actually in the job. Yeah. So when you are, let us know. Right. That's a really good point. So that's, I think, probably another reason that they're gunning for the recess appointments, which basically is just an easier way for the Senate to get around appointing. Do you want to explain the recess appointment? We'll talk about it a little in the Senate block. Basically, in the Constitution,

it says if the Senate is recessed, which it used to be back when they traveled from Wyoming to Washington by horse for many months. If the Senate was in recess, then the president could appoint somebody, and that person would serve until the next term's recess or whatever. And so what previous presidents have done is they try to get their Senate leader to kind of go into recess for a certain amount of time so that they can then put people into office through a recess appointment. Without going through the nomination process. Bush tried to do this a lot when Democrats were blocking him. And Bush would try, like, presidents try to do it because even if their own party controls the Senate sometimes because the Senate is just slow and annoying. Right.

And so that's why you often see if you turn on C-SPAN and it says they're in pro forma session, the reason they're in pro forma session is because then they're not in recess. That's to block the president from making any appointments. Right. We're not doing any work, but we could. So don't try to- We are prepared to work. So don't try to slip anybody through here. Last thing I think about Pete Hegseth here is Dan Caldwell, who is, I think he used to

work at Concerned Vets. He posted last night, I have known Pete Hegseth for over a decade. Like a lot of vets, his foreign policy views evolved as the forever wars dragged on, and their costs soared. If you're calling him a neocon, you have no clue what you're talking about. I think that's accurate. There's some clips dropping of Pete Hegseth talking about Ukraine early in the war, talking about different, he changed his mind on Iraq, for example. He was like a vehement defender of the war in Iraq, which is sort of understandable when he served. He had a different level of insight into the conflict than a lot of the keyboard jockeys now criticizing him

for that. But his views have shifted, like many people, and that's to his credit. I would say that's being intellectually honest with yourself, especially having served and coming back and sort of looking at American foreign policy through a different lens. So, you know, there's something very interesting about this appointment. It is completely unorthodox. It is Trump loving Fox and Friends. I get all of that. I also think it's like the Pentagon is an abject disgrace right now.

And it's going to be actually sort of enjoyable to watch the freak out. And Dan Caldwell, you mentioned there, he's a strong anti-war, anti-neocon voice. And I think this makes this show interesting because it would be easy to flatten Hegseth as just the maniac that he is when it relates to Israel, and we'll talk about that in a bit. But it's much more complicated and nuanced than that. Yeah, 100%. Yes. Yeah. He's shifted along with a lot of people who sort of watched the experiment of post-Vietnam imperialism play out and has been a part of that actual experience. So he's an interesting guy.

I've interviewed him before. He's pretty thoughtful. So Dan and the people at Concern Vets Now, it sort of gets pegged as a Koch group. And it was funded by the Koch brothers. The Kochs have interesting, the Kochs partly fund the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft where Trita Parsi and others are at. So Kochs are interesting when it comes to foreign policy. Right.

So it's just sort of funny to see the neocon. Their money comes from the Soviet Union. So you got to love that. I'm not making that up. Go Google that. So it's just funny to see him get pegged as a neocon. And we'll talk more in a moment. But we also have to get to the Elon and Vivek news.

We'll get back to foreign policy. But yes. Like we said, last night, there was a flurry of appointments coming out after what, like 8 p.m. We had the show basically set and then we kept getting more and more, one of which was the news about Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy now heading up the Department of Government Efficiency or DOJA. Co-heads. Yeah. Co-chairs of this fake commission. Except it's not fake. It is real.

Basically, it's a private, non-governmental commission that will be able to advise the government on what it ought to do. It's giving Deloitte. There is some. Maga McKenzie. Yeah. There is a possibility that Congress could appropriate money for it and incorporate it somehow into the government. That's possible. But they wouldn't want that because Elon would have to, I'm sure Elon would, whatever his formal role is at this department, non-governmental department, he would then have a slew of conflict of interest. Be annoying paperwork, for sure. Well, he might even have to like,

if he wanted to stay at this department of government efficiency, he might even have to like, if he wanted to stay at this Department of Government Efficiency, he might actually even have to formally disentangle himself financially from certain things, which is why this is not a government, it's why he's not being appointed to a government post because, you know, Trump admires his work on Starlink and Tesla and whatever else, and he would not be able to keep most of that business if he went into government. So I look forward to seeing what this commission does and what it recommends. Should be interesting. Now, do you have a similar take to many others that this was a Susie Wiles maneuver

as incoming chief of staff to keep them as far away from the West Wing or any type of governmental position as possible? Not necessarily, because do these guys really want all the smoke that comes with being government employees? I think Vivek might, but. And maybe he'll still get something else.

I was thinking that, too. This doesn't necessarily preclude him from. Yeah. Vivek thrown in there is just kind of funny. Also, there's a world in which you can also see this as a snub to Vivek. I don't know if you saw Elizabeth Warren trolling this, but Elizabeth Warren was like, OK, so you're you have a Department of Government Efficiency and you have co-heads. You just created a department to tackle waste with a position for one person that includes

two people. I think there's some redundancies there. It's also hilarious, of course, because Elon Musk loves to famously say, will they create a new government agency every minute? So the next minute say, will they create a new government agency every minute? Yes, yes. So the next minute, he's gonna create a new government agency. Here we are. To take on government agencies.

Except it's not even a government agency, to your point. It's like a, sort of a fake government agency. It's, you know, we'll see. Like, there's a lot of government waste, no question about it. And you can find some of it on the left. You can find some of it on the right. you can find some of it on the right. You can look at wasteful animal testing, for example, as the white coat waste guys do. Or you could look at, you know, all kinds of like bloated red tape nonsense, as a lot

of people on the right do. So you can find stuff. And it's still not going to really make a drop in the bucket when it comes to the debt. You could literally eliminate the entire Pentagon budget, and you're still not putting a significant debt in the national debt. That's actual math. That's how significant the level of debt is right now. So all that is to say, good luck to Elon and Vivek. Also, this means, Vivek said, he has to take himself out of the running for the Ohio Senate seat.

There's a world in which you can see this as a massive snub from Donald Trump. Vivek has been one of his loudest champions and defenders. I'm not entirely sold on that because I think he's probably very excited to be alongside Elon Musk, the literal most powerful, richest man in the world, heading up this like what they see as this massive effort. And Trump said that they're going to be working alongside the White House and the Office of Management and Budget, so OMB. That could mean basically a very limited type of role, or that could mean something really extensive, depending on how much they put into it. Yeah, all the insight into,

that will come from mapping out the federal government will be extremely lucrative for both these gentlemen. No question about it. Speaking of maniacs. Well, actually, that's a great point. Yes. Right before we get to that, Elon Musk does extensive business with the federal government. He is a huge recipient of subsidies. Right.

So having him sort of with the sandbox to decide what's waste and what's not is there's a reason why it's not part of the government and it's an outside effort. So this is Gilded Age level stuff. It is actually Gilded Age level stuff. And, you know, alongside we're about to talk about Mike Huckabee. There was also an announcement. Bill McGinley is going to be Trump's White House counsel. Kristi Noem was named as Homeland Security. CIA director nominee is former DNI John Ratcliffe. Bob Lighthizer is under

consideration for, quote, trade czar, that kind of role. He used to be USTR, US Trade Representative. And he's good. Yeah. So anyway, those are just some of the big names that were coming out over the course of the day. Yeah. Ratcliffe, before we get to Huckabee, Ratcliffe, he's kind of a, you know, he bucked the kind of intelligence community establishment during his first term. Yeah. And is like an anti-Deep State guy from the Deep State. How would you describe Ratcliffe? I think that's a good way to put it. I believe he's bad on FISA.

I'll have to double check that. Oh, for sure. But yeah, I'm going to, yeah, I'm pretty sure he caved on the 702 stuff and it's not entirely surprising. But if you're anti-Deep State, if you're really anti-Deep State. When he becomes a top spy,

he's going to want all the spy powers. That's, yeah. Yeah. So that's, you know, there's some interesting stuff. He's been critical a little bit of FISA court, et cetera. Over the past six years of making my true crime podcast,

Hell and Gone, I've learned one thing. No town is too small for murder. I'm Katherine Townsend. I've received hundreds of messages from people across the country begging for help with unsolved murders. I was calling about the murder of my husband at the cold case. They've never found her.

And it haunts me to this day. The murderer is still out there. Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've learned as a journalist and private investigator to ask the questions no one else is asking. Police really didn't care to even try. She was still somebody's mother. She was still somebody's daughter.

She was still somebody's sister. There's so many questions that we've never gotten any kind of answers for. If you have a case you'd like me to look into, call the Hell and Gone Murder Line at 678-744-6145. Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I think everything that might have dropped in 95 has been labeled the golden years of hip hop. It's Black Music Month and We Need to Talk is tapping in. I'm Nyla Simone, breaking down lyrics, amplifying voices, and digging into the culture

that shaped the soundtrack of our lives. My favorite line on there was, my son and my daughter gonna be proud when they hear my old tapes. Now I'm curious, do they like rap along now? Yeah, cause I bring him on tour with me and he's getting older now too. So his friends are starting to understand

what that type of music is. And they're starting to be like, yo, your dad's like really the GOAT. Like he's a legend. So he gets it it what does it mean to leave behind a music legacy for your family it means a lot to me just having a good catalog and just being able to make people feel good like that's what's really important and that's what stands out is that our music changes people's lives for the better so the fact that my kids get to benefit off of that, I'm really happy, or my family in general. Let's talk about the music that moves us.

To hear this and more on how music and culture collide, listen to We Need to Talk from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I know a lot of cops, and they get asked all the time, have you ever had to shoot your gun? Sometimes the answer is yes, but there's a company dedicated to a future where the answer will always be no. Across the country, cops called this taser the revolution. But not everyone was convinced it was that simple.

Cops believed everything that taser told them. From Lava for Good and the team that brought you Bone Valley comes a story about what happened when a multi-billion dollar company dedicated itself to one visionary mission. This is Absolute Season 1. Taser Incorporated. I get right back there and it's bad. It's really, really, really bad. Listen to new episodes of Absolute Season 1,

Taser Incorporated, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Binge episodes 1, 2, and 3 on May 21st and episodes 4, 5, and 6 on June 4th. Ad-free at Lava for Good Plus on Apple Podcasts. Mike Huckabee named ambassador to Israel. Famously, Sarah Huckabee Sanders' father. The reason we know Sarah Huckabee Sanders originally is because she is his daughter, former governor of Arkansas. And so Hegseth is one of these Christian Zionists who believes that Israel is going to help usher in the rapture or whatever.

It's one thing to have your Pentagon secretary believing that. And you're like, maybe he won't. He'll just be executing some policy. And he's focused on the entire world. It's not just Israel. Huckabee is that variety of Christian Zionist. And having him serve as the ambassador to Israel is absolutely extraordinary and historic. Just an incredible moment.

We think we have some of him riffing on this, right? Let's put up a four here. What happens next? It's about the end times. And quite frankly, some of us think we may just be living in them. So, Max Lucado, so good to see you. Thanks for joining us and welcome as we talk about the end of the world. Well, Governor, I wouldn't be anywhere else. I'm supremely honored to have these moments with you. And yes, I do believe we're not just in the end times. We're in the end of the end times. It's moving fast.

Max, when you say that, it scares a lot of people. They think, oh, no, the end of the world. That's just terrible. Your whole book is focused on quite a different perspective about the end times. You say in this book, it's not something that we ought to be afraid of. It's something we ought to embrace and look forward to. Okay, that didn't make me less afraid. That actually made me a lot more afraid. Max Lucado is a very popular Christian author. Tell us about, well, let's play Hegseth and then tell us, try to make us a little bit less scared about the period that we're about to have. Here's Hegseth here. This is A for B. But we are here in Jerusalem.

And today, Jennifer and I and others had a chance to go see the western wall of the Temple Mount, the western wall tunnels, so much of the old city. And as you stand there, you can't help but behold the miracle before you. And it got me thinking about another miracle that I hope all of you don't see too far away. Because 1917 was a miracle. 1948 was a miracle. 1967 was a miracle. 1948 was a miracle. 1967 was a miracle. 2017, the declaration of Jerusalem as the capital was a miracle. And there's no reason why the miracle of the reestablishment of the temple on the Temple Mount is not possible. I don't know how it would happen. You don't know how it would happen. But I know that it could happen.

That's all I know. And a step in that process, a step in every process, is the recognition that facts and activities on the ground truly matter. And that's why going and visiting Judea and Samaria, understanding that sovereignty, the very sovereignty of Israeli soil, Israeli cities, locations, is a critical next step to showing the world that this is the land for Jews and the land of Israel. And I believe, as was mentioned, he said you need to, what was mentioned is you need to buy the ticket. Don't just wish for 40 years to win the lottery,

buy the ticket. I would submit to you in light of the support you have in Washington, D.C., the support you have amongst patriotic Americans, amongst evangelical Christians, amongst believers, amongst Republicans, even amongst some Democrats who can barely say it anymore in Washington. Buy the ticket. Take your action. Do what needs to be done here in Israel, because I truly believe this is a moment where America will have your back. You have Donald Trump in the White House. You have Mike Pence as vice president. You have Nikki Haley at the U.N. You have true believers in Israel White House. You have Mike Pence as vice president. You have Nikki Haley at the UN. You have true believers in Israel and America that have your back.

Okay, so he's talking about these true believers. 1917, that's obviously a reference to the Balfour Declaration where, you know, Britain says that they support the establishment of a homeland for the Jewish people in Palestine. When he talks about Judea and Samaria, that's the West Bank. He's talking about sovereignty over the West Bank. We'll talk about that later. The Israeli government is now saying they're going to annex the West Bank. When he says the reestablishment of the temple on the Temple Mount, now we're talking biblical stuff here. We're not talking there about- Talking revelation.

Yeah, we're not talking about building a new temple by human hands, right? We're talking about ushering in the, what, second coming here. What are we talking about here? So I thought of a way to make this less terrifying, actually, while he was speaking, which is, I don't think it's going to make it better, though. It might be less terrifying. But this is basically the worldview that has informed Christian conservative policy towards Israel for, I mean, I would say post 9-11, that's where, I mean, obviously it's been around since before that. But post 9-11, I think is where it really, and you probably watched this play out in

the odds, is where it really sort of congealed into a powerful political force as our policy in the Middle East became more aggressive. I shouldn't say more aggressive, but it's, I mean, it's fair to say when you actually have ground invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan, there was a lot of justifying it with this particular Christian evangelical worldview that gave it a lot of power, especially with a generation of Christians at the time. And I think Pete Hegseth talks a lot about Israel through the conservative lens as being a representative or a bastion of Western civilization. So I don't know to what importance he ascribes each version, to what importance he

talks about. That's the kind of the secular version of it. Both, right. But the spiritual version is that Jews in Israel are going to be the cannon fodder for the apocalypse, right? And bring the Lord Savior back or something. And I don't know if this, again, makes it less terrifying or more comforting,

but that has basically been the engine of evangelical support for political Israel for a while. What an uneasy alliance. Political Israel, it's reading the kind of nation of Israel as political Israel, as the country right now of Israel into different sections of the Bible, which is why people like Max Lucado, and there are varying degrees of seriousness as people approach this, but it's why people like Max Lucado look at what's happening in the world and say we're in the end of the end times, because you can kind of piece together parts of Revelation from what happens in the news. And Huckabee is rejoicing. He's not afraid. He's rejoicing because he's going to

meet his Lord and Savior or whatever. It's dispensationalism, essentially, meaning so in what you're hearing Hegseth talk about there is the third temple. And there are, if you combine this with the fact that there are some Netanyahu allies or part of that right-wing coalition that he kind of has to keep happy and keep together, who are also trying to rebuild the temple because they also were trying to usher in the messianic age. And a real temple, they would build an actual physical temple. They literally have the plans for building a temple. And what they have to do is. And they have to do that to fulfill some of the prophecies of revelation. Right. Yeah, exactly. And so you have to reclaim control of the temple mount, which is obviously not in Israel's control right now. That's why you see people like Ben Gavir

walking into like, you've seen this over the last couple of years, and it terrifies a lot of people. When you have, like, Ben-Gavir making a big point of going to the Temple Mount and all of that, it's an effort, a legitimate, serious effort to rebuild the Temple. Hamas's October 7th attack was called Al-Aqsa Flood. Yes. And which was named for their response to those exact provocations. Well, Al-Aqsa is the mosque that's on the Temple Mount, and they would reject the term Temple Mount. So that's actually really the crux of all this conflict at the end of the day.

Al-Aqsa is an extremely important site for Muslims. It's where, uh, Allah, it's where Muhammad ascended to heaven from. Uh, so, and that's the place of Solomon's temple if you're Jewish or you're Christian. So it's kind of at the heart of the conflict and that's where, yes, this it's, it's just as a piece of land, extremely important. If you are interpreting what's happening right now, biblically, to political Israel, as whenever these prophecies talk about the nation of Israel or Israel as a collective, if you're interpreting that as political Israel, then yeah, it's pretty easy to jump from point A to point B. So we're all going to die. Maybe. But that could be good. I mean, we are all going to die. Maybe. But that could be good.

I mean, we are all going to die, to be fair. That's true. We will all eventually die. We are all going to die. Now, should we move on to Marco Rubio? Producer Mac says, Emily, this did not make me feel any better. Yeah, sorry, Mac.

But I mean, Mac's producer... Gotta say, it didn't make me feel any better either. Producer Mac is from Georgia, so he's probably been surrounded by a lot of the— He had his chances to be saved, and yet here he is, Ethan. Ethan Mac. You know, some of this stuff does go into pretty wacky territory pretty quickly, and I don't agree with— This is just not where I come down on this, even as an evangelical. It's not where I come down on it.

And it frightens me a lot, too. So do I know or do I think that, you know, Pete Hegseth is going to act on this? I mean, yeah. He's Secretary of Defense, and he is very clear about how his religion informs his worldview. This is everything to Mike Huckabee, who is now the ambassador to Israel. But do I think it will mark a significant departure? No, because we are so, we've already wrapped our arms around this. That was the good news.

Right. We're already so maniacally, like, one-directionally headed in that, headed there. It's not going to change that much. Yeah. I don't know that to change that much. Yeah. I don't know that it changes that much. The pedal's already on the floor. Yeah, we're in, yeah, there you go. Excellent.

That made me feel better. Over the past six years of making my true crime podcast, Hell and Gone, I've learned one thing. No town is too small for murder. I'm Katherine Townsend. I've received hundreds of messages

from people across the country begging for help with unsolved murders. I was calling about the murder of my husband at the cold case. They've never found her and it haunts me to this day. The murderer is still out there. Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've learned as a journalist and private investigator to ask the questions no one else is asking. Police really didn't care to even try. She was still somebody's mother. She was still somebody's daughter.

She was still somebody's sister. There's so many questions that we've never gotten any kind of answers for. If you have a case you'd like me to look into, call the Hell and Gone Murder Line at 678-744-6145. Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I think everything that might have dropped in 95 has been labeled the golden years of hip hop. It's Black Music Month and We Need to Talk is tapping in. I'm Nyla Simone, breaking down lyrics, amplifyingifying voices and digging into the culture that shaped the soundtrack

of our lives my favorite line on there was my son and my daughter gonna be proud when they hear my old tapes now I'm curious do they like rap along now

yeah cause I bring him on tour with me and he's getting older now too so his friends are starting to understand what that type of music is and they're starting to be like

yo your dad's like really the GOAT like he's a legend so he gets it. What does it mean to leave behind a music legacy for your family? It means a lot to me, just having a good catalog and just being able to make people feel good. That's what's really important and that's what stands out

is that our music changes people's lives for the better. So the fact that my kids get to benefit off of that, I'm really happy, or my family in general. Let's talk about the music that moves us. To hear this and more on how music and culture collide, listen to We Need to Talk from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I know a lot of cops, and they get asked all the time,

have you ever had to shoot your gun? Sometimes the answer is yes. But there's a company dedicated to a future where the answer will always be no. Across the country, cops called this taser the revolution. But not everyone was convinced it was that simple. Cops believed everything that taser told them. From Lava for Good and the team that brought you Bone Valley comes a story about

what happened when a multi-billion dollar company dedicated itself to one visionary mission. This is Absolute Season One. Taser Incorporated. I get right back there and it's bad. It's really, really, really bad.

Listen to new episodes of Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Binge episodes 1, 2, and 3 on May 21st, and episodes 4, 5, and 6 on June 4th. Ad-free at Lava for Good Plus on Apple Podcasts. We can also make ourselves feel better by reveling in the suffering of Marco Rubio, who two nights ago was reported to be named to be Secretary of State. There were some interesting caveats in the reporting. I think you and I were both immediately hearing from our sources afterwards that said, this is not actually a done deal.

Right. Like he's leaning towards Rubio very strongly. And then probably Rubio still gets this position, but we're almost 48 hours now away from the leaking of the appointment. And there's still no official word. And if you just followed along with that first block, you saw that he's been throwing official names out every 10 minutes. And every time one comes out and it's not Marco Rubio, it's another slight to Marco Rubio who is facing fierce opposition from the world of Tulsa Gabbard, Tucker Carlson. I don't know this from my reporting, but you would imagine Donald Trump Jr., people like him have said that they are opposed to people like Rubio, who come from the neocon wing, as you saw from that compilation that we just put up.

And we can actually play a little bit of Tulsi from last summer talking about Rubio as well as A6. I think it would be a huge mistake for President Trump to choose him because he represents the neocon warmongering establishment of Washington, D.C., which stands diametrically opposed to the very policies that President Trump has always stood for, going all the way back to when he ran for president in 2016 through that first term in office, and the things that he's talking about wanting to do now.

And it would send the wrong message to a lot of folks who are very concerned about the fact that we are on the brink of war with Russia and China and Iran and North Korea. If Marco Rubio is his vice president, then that is what we will face. And it will cause a lot of people to question what kind of foreign policy will actually be executed.

Will it be the one that Trump wants and stands for? Or will it be one that will continue the deep state neocon warmongers? That was July 10th. Right. And so Rubio has adopted domestically a lot of Trump's, or what do you recall, the populist nationalist stuff when it comes to, he's become more pro-worker than he used to be. He's supportive of child tax credits and other supports for working families. Foreign policy, he's just an unreconstructed neocon.

Right? is just an unreconstructed neocon, right? So this is, if we skip ahead one element to A8, because Ryan just made the same point as Kurt Mills, who's the head of the American conservative. He said Rubio is a strange pick. He has one plot, it's on the new right in recent years for his Catholic social conservatism and industrial policy economics. But foreign policy, widely viewed as the area in which he is pre-Trump, also sets up a Hillary slash Biden dynamic with Vance. And as if to kind of make Kurt's point, John Fetterman, this is a seven, waited in sort of inexplicably- Didn't even wait for him to be appointed. He didn't have to say anything, but he went for it. He tweeted, unsurprisingly,

the other team's pick will have political differences than my own. That being said, my colleague, Senator Marco Rubio, is a strong choice and I look forward to voting for his confirmation. This is the John Fetterman that ran on a full-blown populist, I would argue even like Bernie adjacent. Did he endorse Bernie? Yeah. At one point had the endorsement of Bernie

in one of his races. His Senate campaign was in Pennsylvania, but it was sort of the version of Tim Walz that a lot of people really loved about John Fetterman is that he was talking to, you know, voters in red counties with, you know, borderline, I would say democratic socialism and making people like it. So talking to Trump supporters and making people like it. So talking to Trump supporters and making people like it. So that's also part of Rubio's project on populist economics. There's no question about it. He has been really successful at sort of shoehorning those into the conservative movement. He's been a part of a really good shift on the right. Foreign policy, Ryan, you know this better than I do. His approach in Latin America in particular has been quite aggressive.

Neoconservatives, unreconstructed neoconservatism is a great way to put it. He did vote against the round of Ukraine funding that got really controversial. What was this back in like January, February? Although some have pointed out he kind of took a interesting route to get to why he was voting against it. I think he has shifted a little bit on, you know, I think he's very disillusioned with American foreign policy as a whole. But that doesn't translate into Latin America. No, it's extremely disturbing.

Like the Miami Herald has a, you know, is already reporting that Cuba, Venezuela, any country that is not run by a kind of right them, which is, you know, anybody kind of to the left of Javier Millet. And so, yeah, that's dark. But he might not get it, which is wild. It'd be amazing if this falls apart. Yeah, he truly, at this point, when Trump is going through Ratcliffe and Pete Hegseth, and it's leaked to Maggie Haberman. And I think she called by and lined that with Jonathan Swan, both people who are pretty well-informed in Trump world. That was a couple of days ago now. And Rubio World is pretty prepared for this to happen. There was some bickering back and forth over the Rick Grinnell camp, former ambassador to Germany,

and the Rubio camp. Not the Rubio camp, but some new right type people who were even just trying to report on this. There's been some bickering back and forth about whether Grinnell's trying to backstab Rubio, and this is a big conflict. I can only imagine he is. He says he's not. He's never seen a back he hasn't liked to stand up. He says he's not, but it's hard to imagine that. You know, Don Jr. and Tucker Carlson are absolutely having input in this transition process. One of the funny bits of reporting is from Axios that Trump is basically holed up in a makeshift situation room at Mar-a-Lago where they have prepared kind of video decks for him. When he names a person, they can put it on a series of monitors, which I compare to the great scene in Princess Diaries 2 when they're trying to choose a husband for him. When he names a person, they can put it on a series of monitors, which I compare to the great scene in Princess Diaries 2 when they're trying to choose a husband for Mia.

Show me his fox appearances. Yeah. I think that's actually what's happening. So the reporting suggests that's what's happening, so that he can see how they would defend him. Probably explains why Kristi Noem goes to DHS, which is a pick that I find is enormously objectionable for many reasons. But anyway, all that is to say, Rubio could end up not getting the Secretary of State position because there's jockeying against what some people in MAGA world see. And Tulsi Gabbard, we're going to talk about her in the next block, but she would be one of these people who would see him as an unreconstructed neocon, especially because of his support for coups, essentially, in Latin America.

Very similar, like rinse and repeat foreign policy in Latin America that we've had for decades. He's obviously Cuban, so he has a very hawkish approach to the Cuban government and the sanctions regime. He's been friendly with Bukele. Trump is fine with that, yeah. Yeah, he's been friendly with Bukele. He's been friendly with Millet. So those relationships are there. And in case Trump is watching this from his little situation room, let's play one clip that we think ought to sway him in the opposite direction when it comes to some of these picks. Look who is so excited about your picks, Mr. President-elect.

Let's roll A9 here. I know Mike Waltz, full disclosure, is a friend of mine. I feel like this, Elise Stefanik, Susie Wiles, this is probably about as team normal as you get when it comes to Donald Trump picks. Well, I think Elise, whom I've known for many years, can certainly do a fine job at the UN. And I think Mike Waltz will be a fine national security advisor. I should probably say I'll be for him or against him, whichever would help me more, given my relationship with his boss.

So Trump's making that man happy with a lot of these picks. He really is. Listen, like We just went through a huge list of different people and their careers and different points in their careers and all of that. But if you are, let's say you're Donald Trump Jr. or you are Tucker Carlson and you're looking at this list as that graphic in A5 showed just some of the upset in Trump world over Marco Rubio. That's going to extend. There are a lot of people, John Bolton is an example, but there are a lot of people who are more establishment types in Trump world who are looking at this and are really, really happy because they feel like it shows Donald Trump is surrounding himself with like, quote unquote, serious people. They're not going to be so happy about Pete Hegseth, I'm sure.

And that's where the Senate, you know, rubber could meet the road when some of these senators are asked to actually vote on that. But if they're actually asked to vote on that. Let's move on to somebody who has not gotten picked yet. And that is former Democrat and former independent and now Republican, former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard. You can put C1 up on the screen here. So she's been jockeying. She's been close to Trump. She's made inroads to some of his team, yet is struggling so far to gain purchase inside the administration. What's your read on this? I mean, this is a hugely conspicuous absence. I don't know. I mean, you've followed Tulsi Gabbard's career for a long time.

Since before she was elected, yeah. Right. Yes, absolutely. And if we put the next graphic up on the screen, this is B2. This is a quote that we got from someone who's inside the transition world and explained it as thus, because Ryan and I are both trying to poke around and seeing what is going on here. And this source said, Tulsi is not fully trusted by Trump world. That is the bottom line. If you're looking around and wondering why this woman who was used as a surrogate and a powerful surrogate at that, I would say one of Trump's most powerful surrogates, which is why he recognized that and used her all over the campaign. I mean, this is somebody who comes from, she was, what's the formal title? Co-chair of the DNC or deputy chair of the DNC?

Yeah, she was on, she had vice chair, I think. Something like that. Yeah, so in 2016. And so the Trump campaign recognized that there was a lot of power in that message, much more powerful than the flip side of Kamala Harris using Liz Cheney. And Tulsi Gabbard's a great speaker, and she's a good surrogate for Trump and Trumpism. And so she's a recognizable face that was all over shows like Megyn Kelly talking about Donald Trump. And now, even as there are leaks about her eyeing as that first graphics at a defense secretary job, she's totally, I mean, he's went with Pete Hengstead.

Yeah. This is another source told me, someone who is a senior administration official in Trump 1, she is the universal pick amongst base conservative MAGA world for Department of Defense. So this was before the Hegseth announcement came out. So she even has purchase with MAGA world. There are people in MAGA world who really, really love her. But because she is, as my understanding is, because she's such a new convert to Trumpism, Trump world just doesn't fully trust her with one of these positions, which is she's beloved by the base.

So if she ends up with absolutely nothing, that speaks to a level of distrust that I think has been kept from public. Yeah. And as somebody who's in Trump world put it to me, he said, quote, she rubs people the wrong way sometimes, which actually that follows her from the Democratic Party. Like that was a problem she had over there as well. Maybe some of this is misogyny, not saying that's limited to Republicans at all. But also, you know, she's interesting, different, and iconoclastic, and that can rub people the wrong way. So there is some personal stuff going on here.

The source also said he thought that she was still in the running, still in the mix, being talked about for director of national intelligence, which is wild. Like, you know, because she was a couple-term member of Congress. Right. So to move from there to director of national intelligence would be a rather extraordinary leap. But also reflects the, you know, the way that Trump has kind of upended things and made things that would be completely impossible in a previous era possible. Yeah, we'll see if she gets that. I'm sure she's trying to be in the race for it. There are other people who you would imagine might be

ahead of her, but she does have, I think, I mean, her foreign policy departs from even Trump's on insignificant ways. Syria is a good example, And from Hegseth in very significant ways. It's a very interesting foreign policy. She's far right when it comes to Hindu nationalism. It's aligned with Modi, basically. It's a huge supporter of the war on terror, like drone strikes. And some of the Islamophobia or some of the hostility to political Islam that is inherent in some of that far right wing Hindu nationalism is present in her support for a global war on terror. And support for the global war on terror is not really consistent with the kind of America first attempt to retrench American power projection. So your point about Syria is a good one. So she's against regime change wars but supportive of lots of drone strikes against Muslims.

So it's like, yeah, she's different. She doesn't fit neatly into one box or the other, meaning if you're distrustful. She sort of does. She fits neatly into kind of like a Modi box. Well, but one box in Trump or the other. But that box doesn't fit in the United States. Yeah, exactly. So yeah, if you don't fit into one of the, like you're not fully in, you couldn't perfectly be described like in the Tucker box, in the Don Jr. box, or in the Marco Rubio box.

And so if you're in between. There's elements of her that all different factions like. But all different factions distrust. But all different factions are uncomfortable with different elements of her. Right, which would mean that you don't have a lot of full-throated advocates for an actual substantive defense position. Maybe she'll get something that more involves ceremonial, public-facing representation of the administration's policies. I don't know. There's sort of interesting that she may end up with nothing super substantive. Yeah, we'll see.

And she might. She might get a big job. She might. We'll see. Over the past six years of making my true crime podcast, Hell and Gone, I've learned one thing. No town is too small for murder. I'm Katherine Townsend. I've received hundreds of messages from people

across the country begging for help with unsolved murders. I was calling about the murder of my husband at the cold case. They've never found her. And it haunts me to this day. The murderer is still out there. Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've learned as a journalist and private investigator

to ask the questions no one else is asking. Police really didn't care to even try. She was still somebody's mother. She was still somebody's daughter. She was still somebody's sister. There's so many questions that we've never gotten any kind of answers for. If you have a case you'd like me to look into, call the Hell and Gone Murder Line at

678-744-6145. Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I think everything that might have dropped in 95 has been labeled the golden years of hip-hop. It's Black Music Month and We Need To Talk is tapping in. I'm Nyla Simone, breaking down lyrics, amplifying voices,

and digging into the culture that shaped the soundtrack of our lives. My favorite line on there was, my son and my daughter gonna be proud when they hear my old tapes. Now I'm curious, do they like rap along now? Yeah, because I bring him on tour with me and he's getting older now too. So his friends are starting to understand what that type of music is and they're starting to be like yo your dad's like really the goat like he's a legend so he gets it what does it mean to leave behind a music legacy for your family it means a lot to me just having a good catalog and just being able to make people

feel good like that's what's really important and that's what stands out is that our music changes people's lives for the better so the fact that my kids get to benefit off of that I'm really happy or my family in general let's talk about the music that moves us to hear this and more on how music and culture collide listen to we need to talk from the black effect podcast network on the iheart radio Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I know a lot of cops, and they get asked all the time, have you ever had to shoot your gun? Sometimes the answer is yes. But there's a company dedicated to a future where the answer will always be no. Across the country, cops called this taser the revolution.

But not everyone was convinced it was that simple. Cops believed everything that taser told them. From Lava for Good and the team that brought you Bone Valley comes a story about what happened when a multi-billion dollar company dedicated itself to one visionary mission. This is Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated. I get right back there and it's bad. It's really, really, really bad.

Listen to new episodes of Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Binge episodes 1, 2, and 3 on May 21st and episodes 4, 5, and 6 on June 21st and episodes four, five, and six on June 4th. Ad-free at Lava for Good Plus on Apple Podcasts. As we speak this morning, right now, Republican senators are casting secret ballots for their new majority leader in the upper chamber. Their options are the very enticing trio of John Thune, John Cornyn, and Rick Scott. I said that sarcastically, obviously.

But it looks like right now there's some leaks coming out of the meeting, which is happening again as we're speaking. It looks like it's going to be John Cornyn. That could obviously change. So why does any of this matter? There are some obvious reasons and then some less obvious ones, too. With a majority in the Senate and likely majority in the House, Republicans will be able to pass major legislation when Donald Trump is inaugurated in January.

The Senate confirms cabinet and court nominations. The majority leader sets the tone and makes procedural decisions with massive consequences, even if all of this is often obfuscated by a very confusing inside baseball. Here's how our friend Rachel Bovard, a longtime Senate staffer, including on the steering committee, put it in the Federalist yesterday, channeling what I think is fair to say, the broader sentiments of the conservative world. Rachel wrote, quote, for Senate Republicans, this means closing the book on the Mitch McConnell

era of governance marked by heavily centralized management and open hostility to the Trump agenda and the Republican base. On November 13th, they will elect a new leader for the first time in nearly 18 years and have a chance to usher in a new leadership that is accountable to the conference and the priorities of the evolving base of the Republican Party. So the majority leader is the party's chief negotiator. If he won't go to the mat for, let's say, cutting Ukraine funding or a hardcore border bill,

MAGA senators and Donald Trump can't do that much about it other than exert public pressure, which is powerful, and then play hardball in smoke-filled back rooms. So why is this a problem for Republicans? Trump is claiming a mandate, so why would any of the options for majority leader be a thorn in his side on these issues? John Thune and John Cornyn are longtime allies of Mitch McConnell, who has made no secret of his personal disdain for Trump. Thune and Cornyn, both from red states, joined the Senate in the Bush years. Rick Scott entered politics as Florida governor in the Tea Party wave and then joined the Senate in 2019, where he quickly aligned himself with the MAGA movement.

In 2022, as McConnell insisted on his tradition of not releasing a policy agenda, Scott sought to fill that vacuum with a plan to rescue America. That was what it was called. He courted conservative thinkers and journalists, including myself, seeking to establish himself as the populist alternative to McConnell, operating on the understanding that McConnell was ailing and also deeply unpopular. At the time, Scott was talking to people, again, I had conversations with him about all of this, really laying the groundwork, and it was a clever move. He was buying goodwill with people who would be in positions to offer public support of him, including people in the Senate, including people in the media. But backlash over the plan's points on the social safety net, which were used by Democrats in their campaigns, brought about a

consensus in some Republican circles, actually in Republican circles generally, that Scott was kind of in over his head, got ahead of his skis. Nevertheless, after the GOP's disappointing 2022 midterms, Scott scored 10 votes in the secret ballot election for Senate leader. McConnell still got 37, but picking off 10 was pretty impressive, given that a lot of senators were being publicly asked by reporters to say how they voted. National media is now acting like Rick Scott's challenge basically came out of nowhere. It did not. He has been laying the groundwork for this over the course of several years.

And sensing an opportunity to either change leadership or pressure them to be better, Mike Lee really followed in the footsteps of the House Freedom Caucus recently. The Freedom Caucus obviously pushed Kevin McCarthy to make all kinds of concessions in exchange for their votes for his speakership. And Lee put out a list of parliamentary demands to empower conservatives. He's been working hard in public and private to push the list and to push Rick Scott's bid. The demands are super granular, they sound super granular, but would be pretty consequential. Lee wants four weeks of time for debating and amending omnibus bills. He wants a floor schedule for appropriations. He wants to reform something called filling the tree in the amendment process. And he wants

term limits on leaders and then goals to be stated up front every year. Trump himself has treated the question of recess appointments as a litmus test for the next leader. Ryan and I had talked about that earlier in the show. Getting through recess appointments would allow him to fill up his cabinet quickly and without pushing members to take controversial votes. Now, it's all similar stuff to what happened with Kevin McCarthy. Demands that kind of harken back to the Tea Party years when conservatives were demanding leadership listen to the base. Lee, of course, would arguably be a better and more appealing and charismatic leader than Rick Scott himself, but Lee's libertarian slash populist streak means he almost surely would not be able to secure enough votes from

a conference that still includes centrists like Susan Collins. Earlier this year, Donald Trump Jr. tweeted, quote, Rhino Senators John Thune and John Cornyn both want to replace Mitch McConnell once he finally gets put out to pasture. Both of them also voted to send billions more to Ukraine. MAGA must do everything in our power to either stop, to stop either of these RINOs from ever becoming Senate leader. Both men are seen as being aligned with more of the donor class than the base on foreign policy and the border, voting as Ukraine hawks

and supporting Senator James Lankford's Trojan horse McConnell pushed border deal earlier this year. To say the very least, they are out of step with most Republican voters, but just about anyone in a leadership position in Congress

is going to be, which is why the bench of potential successors to McConnell isn't very deep. It's either two friends of his or the one guy crazy enough to take those guys on. Rick Scott is not perfect, but he's made a political calculation that populism is where the votes are. So that means the MAGA agenda will clearly be better off with him in power, even if he's an unlikable ambassador for the cause and struggles to actually get anything done. Now, those are both serious problems. And recognizing Scott's odds, MAGA operators in the conservative movement seem to have secured some concessions from John Cornyn, who's politically

ambitious enough to recognize that it's wise to pull a little bit of a McCarthy here and give those guys something. Just last night, he released a dear colleague letter saying that he's with Rick Scott and actually with Mike Lee on some of those priorities about how they could reform Senate procedures. So if MAGA world, if conservatives can defeat John Thune, it'll be a win either way for MAGA, which would have simply gotten nothing if Lee hadn't mounted this effort behind the scenes. And it's a win for actual conservative voters, by the way, who will also now have a little bit more of a voice in DC, whether you like MAGA populists or not.

This will empower anti-establishment voices. The real question now is just how much it will empower them. So Ryan, you've covered the Senate for a really long time. Some of this is actually left over from the Harry Reid era. You covered Harry Reid very closely. Filling the tree, I think, is a process that Harry Reid was sort of a pioneer of, at least in recent history. So I'm curious from the perspective of somebody on the left, the anti-establishment wing of the Democratic Party has played a little bit more nicely with Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi and now Hakeem Jeffries than the Freedom Caucus guys and Ted Cruz and Mike Lee did, especially

in the Tea Party era, Rand Paul as well. Some of this sounds great even from like a bipartisan perspective, like actually having four weeks of debate on omnibus bills, having your party leader say what your goals are at the beginning of every year. I don't know. It actually just seems like a way to make the Senate work better. Right. But just like the Freedom Caucus reforms that they successfully extracted, when the rubber hits the road, they get tossed out. Bills still get put on the floor and moved quickly through,

despite promises that, oh, you'll get 72 hours to look, everybody will get to amend. All of these promises that they make about democracy end up kind of just getting tossed out in reality. But, yes, from a just small-D democratic perspective, it would be nice if we had democratic institutions again. Yeah. No, I mean, yeah. At some point, you're like, hold on. You've got the president, the Supreme Court, and Congress. And then if Congress is run by four people who are all from red or blue states and basically cannot be voted out. So the four people being the House Democratic leader, House Republican leader, Senate Democratic leader, Senate Republican leader. They call them the firm.

They call them the big four. Then the only way that you can, as a voter, influence power is by switching parties from Republican to Democratic. Yeah. since none of the representatives or senators have any power because they're just at the, you know, they're just at the whim of this, this big four. Like how different is that than China? Like in China, like, you know, the, the government is responsive to people's will, not through democratic elections because they don't want to get overthrown. They want to make people happy. They want to keep prices low. They want to keep the economy growing. Yeah, I'd rather have elections. Sure, but if all your elections can do

is narrowed down to this tiny margin, it's not that impressive of a system from a democratic perspective. So a lot of the objectionable foreign policy that most voters would say, if you put this in front of me in a ballot referendum, I would vote it down. Most of that gets packed into these omnibus bills that aren't really debated on. So the senators just say, this was my leverage at the last minute. That's just what we had to do to get this other priority. And if you have more debate on omnibus bills, you probably will get a slightly more representative foreign policy because senators will have to take a little bit more heat for having these conversations in public. So that's at least, I mean, Cornyn last night, literally last night, came around and he

put out a dear colleague letter essentially agreeing with a lot of the tenets of the Lee plan that Rick Scott had pushed. And so a source told me basically this is a win for us either way as long as it's not John Thune. So if they come out of this with either Rick Scott or John Cornyn, the Mike Lee wing, the conservative wing is going to feel pretty good about it, even though people like Ted Cruz do have longtime connections with Thune because he was a McConnell, he's obviously a McConnell ally, a McConnell deputy. You had to have good relationships with him. You had to make inroads with him in order to get anything done, which, I mean, Rick Scott, how much can he get done? He's, you know, broadly disliked by a lot of people.

And he's putting out things about how he was a business leader, trying to convince some of the establishment people to come over to him because he was a business leader. And now you and I could talk about his record as a business leader. He oversaw basically the greatest Medicare fraud in the history of the United States. Somehow is not in prison and instead is on the cusp of being, you know, Senate majority leader. John Cornyn, yeah, is an old school Chamber of Commerce Democrat from Texas. Republican, yeah. Yeah. Did I say Democrat?

You said Democrat. But a lot of people on the right would be like, Republican, yeah. Yeah. Did I say Democrat? You said Democrat. But a lot of people on the right would be like, yeah, yeah. And he would have been a Democrat in the 60s, 70s from Texas. Actually, he may even have been when he was younger because it was a one-party state. But it was a Democratic state back when LBJ was around. He has spent decades, or at least close to two decades, raising money for his colleagues in the Senate Republican Conference and is very attentive to their needs and is well-liked by them. And so if he wins, it'll be because that old school method of winning power still works. Like he, when these people were running for the Senate for the first time,

he was there in their district raising money for them, connecting them with donors, you know, making sure they won. And people feel a real loyalty for that.

When Rick Scott was in charge of electing senators, he put out some stupid plan where he was going to like tax half the country. It was entitlements that people were like,

you're cutting social care. Yeah, what are you doing? You're making it harder for us to win an election rather than easier. Winning your job is to make it easier. If Rick Scott sneaks through, it'll be because the establishment split them, split their votes between Thune and Cornyn,

which would be an impressive own goal on their part. Right, yeah, and a couple other things to mention. Trump has so far stayed out of the race. And obviously, I mean, they're voting now. Even J.D. Vance, who's there for the vote. But Trump wing is very clearly Rick Scott. Yeah. Yes. Although, you know, Cornyn is obviously trying to be really friendly with those folks. And I think Trump just wants whoever wins. That's probably the correct theory as to why he stayed out of it. J.D. Vance wouldn't say who he was voting for, according to at least the earlier reports we're getting, when he was, or who he was supporting when he came to the Senate today. So Trump is on Capitol Hill today.

He's actually going to talk to people. He's going to the White House today. That's another important subplot in today's crazy news cycle with all the appointments and all of this going on. But Mitch McConnell is the longest serving party leader in the history of the Senate. So that's why this is extremely consequential. Thune and Cornyn had a lot of negative things to say about Donald Trump over the years when it came to things like the Access Hollywood tape. Obviously, they voted differently than a lot of the MAGA wing would want them to in Ukraine. So there's this real deep-seated fear that they will do everything they can to undermine the goals of the MAGA agenda when it's actually rubber meets the road in

legislation. And even just as they're fundraising and negotiating and all of that stuff, Mitch McConnell is seen as somebody who, going back to the Tea Party years, was undercutting the hard right in fundraising and at his Senate leadership fund and with those various groups. So it's a pretty consequential position and definitely a new era in the GOP. Yeah, interesting. All right, up next, Russian counteroffensive in Kursk as both sides await kind of Trump's intervention in this conflict. So if we can put D1 up on the screen, it's very hard to know what's going on in the war between Russia and Ukraine, obviously, because both sides are pushing their propaganda. But according to Ukrainian forces, the last couple of days have been among the highest rates of casualties, almost 2,000 apiece in two straight days for Russian forces as they have launched a counteroffensive. Now,

Ukraine does not break down, you know, how that includes, you know, whether that includes, you know, killed, wounded, or taken prisoner. But the reason that it's plausible that Russia is suffering huge casualties is that they are trying in the space of a couple of months to take back as much territory as they possibly can before Trump is sworn in on January 20th. Over the weekend, you can put up D2 here. There are a lot of reports that Russia was massing, you know, 50,000 troops for this cursed counteroffensive, many of them actually North Korean special forces. Yes. So this is where, because what they're trying to do and what they claim that they have successfully

been able to do is mass this 50,000 person fighting force without taking troops away from anywhere else on the front lines. And so it would stand to reason that because they are just throwing as many people as they can at the Ukrainian defenses, that they are indeed suffering significant casualties. But that doesn't mean that they will ultimately be able to be stopped because they have more manpower than Ukraine does at this point. Now, obviously, the defensive line is much easier to maintain with landmines and with drone technology. Meanwhile, Russia is launching enormous numbers, apparently, of suicide drones at the Ukrainians. So this is going to be hell on earth, probably, for the next several weeks or months as the two sides jockey for position ahead of

what they both expect will be some kind of a forced ceasefire. You put up the third element here. This is an article from Newsweek making the same point, Russia racing against time to retake Kursk ahead of Trump ceasefire. That's, I think, an interesting way to frame this. And you talked about that when we opened the show up a little bit. And I guess, how connected do you think this is? I mean, this is happening against the backdrop of all of these actually fairly hawkish appointments. Some genuinely heterodox, but like fairly hawkish appointments coming out. So how connected do you think this is from Donald Trump, I should say? How connected do you think this is to the potential shift in policy under Donald Trump? Which by the way, we don't actually know what it would be

because Trump repeatedly over the course of the campaign trail hedged on his plan. He said he doesn't want to say his plan because that would be telegraphing too much to world leaders. Obviously, people are worried that Trump is going to appoint people who are, or Trump already has appointed people. For example, Rubio didn't fully back the Ukraine spending just several months ago. And that Donald Trump will be more aligned with Tucker Carlson on Ukraine, and he'll appoint Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to powerful

positions, and he'll be listening to them. So far, that's not really what his foreign policy looks like it'll be shaping up to be in the second administration. But how connected do you think it is to the possibility? What we're seeing right now is connected to the possibility that there's a hawkish shift in Washington. I think it's completely what we're seeing here. Interesting. Yeah. Because Biden's been pretty hawkish. Not hawkish. I think that Putin really does feel like, and Zelensky feel the same way. I think that Trump is going to try to end this war so that he can deliver on a kind of campaign promise. And Trump has said that there has to be a negotiated end to this. And so I think

everybody feels like the end is coming. Whether Trump can actually enforce an end is an open question, but people think that he's going to try. We can put up D4 here. This is Fox News reporter Trey Yankst, who's saying, you can't understate how challenging the front is right now for Ukrainian forces. Updated maps show multiple Russian advances in Donetsk. This comes as reports indicate 50,000 Russian and North Korean soldiers staging for a counter-offensive curse.

So they're making advances in Donetsk while also pushing here as well against a very much depleted force. Zelensky, just the other day, actually we can put up D5 here. This is at a press conference with European media where Zelensky said, look, we're not, you know, Trump can try to push me into a deal, but I'm not going to make one. Zelensky said, I believe that President Trump really wants a quick decision, unquote, to end the conflict. But he added, quote, it doesn't mean that it will happen this way. Zelensky stressed that a peace process must be just and not risk leaving Ukraine vulnerable.

Quote, Trump wants this war to be finished. Zelensky continued acknowledging that while everyone shares that goal, that Ukraine is not going to be kind of pushed around. So, like, there is, that's Zelensky's claim. So, everybody is aware that Trump wants to end this. What that actually means, what Trump does with that, and what that means on the ground is the thing that they're fighting through now. And obviously, if Putin is able to make significant advances, it gives him leverage going into any potential conversations. And right now, Ukraine is in Russia. Yeah.

Which Ukraine is hoping... With no plan to exit. Right, and some in Ukraine hope, like, okay, this is our leverage. Then to get back Ukrainian territory will give you back this Russian territory. So we'll say it's almost 2025 and this is a war that's been going for years

that really shouldn't be. This is awful. And North Korea's involvement is also, I think, reasonably disconcerting. Well, I mean, wrapping all of the nuclear powers into one conflict, what could go wrong? Yeah, come on. Yeah. All right, Ryan, we have a guest lined up that is, I'm very eager to get this perspective. Someone who you've worked with at Dropsite, who's written for Dropsite.

Abu Bakr Abed, a reporter from Daribala, joins us next to talk about what conditions are like there after the 30-day deadline given by the United States to Israel to increase humanitarian aid has expired. So stick around for that. Over the past six years of making my true crime podcast, Hell and Gone, I've learned one thing. No town is too small for murder. I'm Katherine Townsend.

I've received hundreds of messages from people across the country begging for help with unsolved murders. I was calling about the murder of my husband at the cold case. I've never found her. And it haunts me to this day. The murderer is still out there.

Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've learned as a journalist and private investigator to ask the questions no one else is asking. Police really didn't care to even try. She was still somebody's mother. She was still somebody's daughter.

She was still somebody's sister. There's so many questions that we've never got any kind of answers for. If you have a case you'd like me to look into, call the Hell and Gone Murder Line at 678-744-6145. Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I think everything that might have dropped in 95 has been labeled the golden years of hip-hop. Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. hear my old tapes yeah now i'm curious do they like rap along now yeah because i bring him on tour with me and he's getting older now too so his friends are starting to understand what that

type of music is and they're starting to be like yo your dad's like really the goat like he's a legend so he gets it what does it mean to leave behind a music legacy for your family it means a lot to me just having a good catalog and just being able to make people feel good. Like that's what's really important. And that's what stands out is that our music changes people's lives for the better. So the fact that my kids get to benefit off of that, I'm really happy. Or my family in general. Let's talk about the music that moves us.

To hear this and more on how music and culture collide, listen to We Need to Talk from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I know a lot of cops and they get asked all the time, have you ever had to shoot your gun? Sometimes the answer is yes, but there's a dedicated to a future where the answer will always be no. Across the country, cops called this taser the revolution. But not everyone was convinced it was that simple. Cops believed everything that taser told them. From Lava for Good and the team that brought you Bone Valley comes a story about what happened when a multibillion-dollar company dedicated itself to one visionary mission.

This is Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated. I get right back there and it's bad. It's really, really, really bad. Listen to new episodes of Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Binge episodes 1, 2, and three on May 21st and episodes four, five, and six on June 4th. Ad-free at Lava for Good Plus on Apple Podcasts.

Joining us now from Derry Bala, Gaza, is Abu Bakr Abed, contributor at Dropsite News. Abu Bakr, thanks so much for joining us. Thank you so much for having me as well. And let's start. We can put your dispatch up on the screen here. This was in DropSite yesterday. Incredible first-person report that also gets into a lot of the kind of technical details as well as what's going on. I just want to read a quick portion from it for people so they can get a flavor for it. You write, I dream of food every day. I imagine our fridge full of meat, lettuce, milk, and cheese. I sometimes talk to myself at night when I'm hungry and have nothing to eat. I dream of when I will

be able to sit at a dinner table with my family again. My nephew and niece, both two years old, wake up every day crying for an egg. Their mothers don't know what to do. To distract them a bit, we show them videos of eggs on the internet. You also, you know, you write about some anecdotes where a mother breastfeeding a baby, waiting in line for hours for something and just coming up empty. But your story also gets into the data and the stats about what is getting in. So as you compare the conditions that you've been able to report on over the last several weeks and a month, if you compare those to several months ago, how do those compare? Because the

State Department said Israel has one month to improve. Did things improve? Not at all. No, unfortunately, because I've been hearing from the Secretary Blinken since the start of this genocide, but he's absolutely been lying because what we see on the ground is that even humanitarian organizations are not allowed to operate well across the territory. But at the same time, what I need to tell you is that even aid is not distributed well to families. Like, for example, a lot of families here are groaning in pain and groaning in hunger every single day because there is no aid reaching them on a very daily basis because these people have been displaced.

They have no hope at the moment. They don't work. Their families don't have anything to do with this war because they're not a part of this war. So they say that if there are humanitarian organizations working on the ground, so why are we not receiving aid every single day? And I can tell you that there are many families here in particular around me, where I am at the moment, and they can tell you that since the start of this genocide,

they haven't received any aid boxes at all, at all, literally at all. And let me start with myself. I haven't received anything from the start of this war. But it's very important to tell you that our main objective, our main hope is that this world must end. We don't need aid, we don't need anything. But what we've seen over the last two weeks in particular is that people have been calling out to what? To bring in some aid, to bring in flows of aid and quite, you know, enhance the humanitarian situation inside Gaza. But instead, the United States has sent more weapons to Israel, more bombs that killed much more families, many more families around Gaza. Here in Dar al-Bara, at least over the past two weeks, since the start of October, like

over the last 30 days, we're talking about more than 100 people have been killed in Dar al-Bara. And yesterday, tents were set ablaze here one small time, and two children were killed, many others were unjacked. So it's a very apocalyptic situation here. And I know you're familiar with all of the arguments from people in the West in particular who will say the reason this food isn't getting to the people who need it is because of Hamas, and Hamas is to blame for people, if people are hungry, it's because of Hamas. But then a lot of people will add to that argument that it's a mythical famine, that

it's not really happening, those two positions are sort of mutually exclusive. But what do you say to people who just cannot, what is the way for food to actually get to people who desperately need it. How can countries... Go ahead, yeah. Yeah, I mean, like, there is some sort of, you know, that aid warplanes threw aid upon us, and this has been repeated over the course of time. But this is a humiliation.

This way and method has killed hundreds of time. But this is a humiliation. This way and method has killed hundreds of people. Like there is an aid box thrown over a tent, and it just damaged this tent, and people inside it are killed. But the way is, the safest way is, is to open the two crossings that Israel has closed for the past 30 days and since May, because the Rafei Krosynk has been closed since May. And you mentioned something, again, like, Emily, I'm not a political person, but what I've seen on the ground yesterday, because people haven't been aware of that. I wrote that on Twitter, but I deleted it then. Gaza, that is so close to me. If things are like what people are thinking about, then why yesterday they are not, for me, they're not Hamas fighters because they are local

security forces. That's what we call them. That's how we should call them. Yesterday, they intercepted the work of a group of gangs and militias that tried to hijack and try coming from Karim Abu Abu Salem to central Gaza. So if it is about Hamas, if we talk about that, then why this? Why did the local security forces yesterday risk themselves and went out just to intercept this work, this absolutely disgusting, disgraceful work? But we need to know that these people, these gangs are assigned by the Israeli military to cause chaos and to cause this sort of confusion and turmoil among people and deprive thousands of families trapped in the territory from this very important aid.

Because I myself and a lot of families, every single family around us here in the South, there in the North, they are buying aid. And we buy that by extremely excessive and unimaginable prices. And the prices are skyrocketing. But also, it's very important to know that the aid we're getting, either to you, Ryan, to Emily or the audience, people, look, respect us. We are humans like you. The aid we're getting is absolutely of the lowest quality. They send us absolutely the lowest quality. Talk to people here. They have had many times like severe gastroenteritis, hepatitis A virus. And then when they are dispatched to the hospital, we've been talking to doctors from the ground and told us that it is because of this aid, because this aid is absolutely so bad. It doesn't make any sense.

It tastes so bad. So do not allow the flow of aid to get into the territory, into Gaza, the besieged enclave, and then send us or dispatch some sort of very bad quality aid. That is not the case, because we are humans. Don't send aid. Like, we are accepting the fact to be starved, but do not humiliate us and dehumanize us by sending such so-called aid that you are sending us, which is absolutely non-eatable at all.

Yeah, you write in the article about how much of the flour is completely bug infested, that pet food is becoming something of a staple, but I'm wondering if you could elaborate a little bit more on what you were saying about the gangs who are kind of, who have risen up because there is a lot of suspicion from outside. They say, how is it that the IDF, how is it that Israel is allowing all of these gangs to flourish? You they're able to say drones are you know flying constantly everywhere they can see these armed gangs going around you know hijacking aid

uh they they attack they attack hamas if they are able to see them but they yet they allow these gangs to go forward how what is the relationship here? I mean, like, there's a very important thing to know, which is that, like, all what is happening on the ground, because I've been speaking to some merchants from the ground, and what they can tell you is that all the things, all of these events, the train of events is happening near Karam Abusail. It's all about that area, which is the crossing through which things are allowed to enter the strait. But what happened here is that

the Israeli military is sending quadcopters and drones for surveillance tasks and to watch over what is happening nearby. And then when they say, because they mark their gangs and they were assigned to gangs and militias.

So if they see one, like, apart from their gangs, they directly upon this group of people, for example, if they are local security forces, because there is a difference between, again, there's a difference between the resistance fighters who are Hamas fighters for people who are fighting this military, and a difference between the local security forces. The local security forces are absolutely civilians. They have nothing to do with Hamas. So they are not Hamas to bomb them and kill them. So that is what is really happening.

Relationship is that we've seen here in Deir el-Balak myself that a group of people in the southwest of the Klan have been armed by the Israeli military weapons and etc. So when you talk about it, Hamas doesn't have the ability to have such weapons. So you can expect that these people are causing such a great deal of panic among people, even that during the night hours, some people are getting out of their houses and they are then held at gunpoint by these gangs. And they are threatened just like to get everything they have.

So a lot of people have gone through such an experience because of these gangs who have created such chaos. And a lot of people have lost many things. Like for example, if a merchant has a big amount of money coming out to bring some goods or something, and of course, there are unimaginable prices. And then they have such money. And then those gangs signed by the Israeli military and the Israeli army are going to face them, confront them, and take all this money from them under the threat of propping up and arming gangs in order to kind of sow dissension inside of Gaza and to undermine Hamas. Is that people's understanding of what's going on? I mean, there is, yeah, they already know, but it's just because there's a lot of chaos inside the Turkish.

So we don't know where it does go. I'm very sorry, but people have to know to understand even that those gangs, it is very surprising and shocking, but we've seen this on the ground, which is those gangs sometimes belong to the humanitarian organizations working on the ground. So, for example, Honora or World Century Kitchen, I'm not going to say Black. I'm saying, for example, but I've seen people who are responsible for this sort of act in the territory, stealing and hijacking aid flags.

They belong to the humanitarian organizations do not operate well, not only because they are under the threat of the Israeli military. No, because most of them, like some of them inside, are responsible, are liable, and they are the mastermind of these acts of hijacking, etc. So we will understand and know that these humanitarian organizations are also responsible for what they are going through, and the starvation forced upon them. But the main reason we need to know that all of this has been caused by the Israeli military. So there is nothing to do with the civilians or the local security forces.

The local security forces are doing their very best. They are exerting strenuous efforts to secure the flow of aid and the entry of aid to all people around Gaza. It simply bombs them. So that's what is really happening on the ground. And people have to also realize the fact that it's like

signing people, and we are in a time that people would easily give up their principles and their you know, their, I mean, greed just to find some sort of living and try to resist them in such incredibly harsh circumstances. So they are easily bombazled and deceived and persuaded by the Israeli army to work within such a very, you know, a very bad and immoral way.

Ryan, should we play the State Department clip? Yeah, let's roll. I wanted to get your response to the State Department spokesperson, you know, Vidan Patel. Yesterday was the deadline for Israel. The deadline set by the United States and metrics set by the United States. That deadline hit yesterday. And here's how the State Department responded.

I want to get some of your response to it. Let's play roll, beat Ampatel. This is E5. Why did you bother to put in 350 trucks a day if it doesn't matter? I'm not going to speak to the- I mean, you keep saying you're not going to speak to specific metrics, but you guys are the ones that made this specific. We didn't. We didn't give the Israelis 30 days to do all this stuff. You guys did. And now those 30 days are up. And as you heard from everyone so far and these aid groups that came out last night, they haven't met them. And all of a sudden you say that the metrics that you put out don't matter.

We've never said I had never said that they don't matter. What I said was these are metrics exactly like you put out. It's not a rabbit hole. Meaning I don't want to take up time getting into a specific tit-for-tat on, like, truck numbers. What's your response to that exchange between Matt Lee? I've seen that. Yeah, I've seen that yesterday.

I saw it. But it's really, as I told you, that they are just manufacturing the genocide in Gaza. They are liable for every brutal act of killing children, disempowering them and dismembering them. And they are not allowing any sort of way to get it. They're just lying to people all around. Because everyone here knows, like from the ground up, tell them. I can tell you that my nephews and nieces who haven't exceeded five years old, all around because everyone here knows like from the ground, child, tell them, like,

I can tell you that my nephews and nieces are, who haven't exceeded five years old. They can tell you that the United States is killing us because they have, you know, they have that sort of knowledge right now of what the United States is about, because it's really important to know that the United States is co-patrioting the genocide in Gaza. And you can see right now how many,

like there is a fourth generation of amputees in the city. You can go out in any of the seasons in Gaza. And you can see right now how many, like there is a fourth generation of amputees in the sea. You can go out in any of the seasons in Gaza, either in the south or north, and you can see at least two to three people amputated. And this is a result and a symptom of this Israeli-U.S. American genocide happening on the ground. So the United States have never, ever wanted peace. And, like, look, I've been, like, I'm not a political person yet once again, but I can tell you that the United States have never wanted peace, and it's responsible for every conflict that is happening across the globe, even in Ukraine, even in Sudan, because there are men in the RSF

that is responsible for the genocide in Sudan. So it's the United States. The United States has never wanted peace, and it will continue supporting and funding the genocide in Gaza and arming Israel because it's Israel. It's their friend. It's their ally. It's their staunchest friend, etc. But again, I mean,

if the United States ever, ever cared about us, this would end from a very, very call from Biden in the beginning of this war. It was simply put, it was just simply put, Hamas told the fighters, the resistance, as we call it, told the Israeli military that we could exchange prisoners.

And what we know so far is that after a week, the Israeli army has killed more than 5,000 people in Gaza. So this sort of retaliation is more than, this is more of a disproportionate response to what Hamas did on September 2nd. But then when things were put and the conditions were put by Hamas and resistant fighters here, Israel admitted it. It said no.

And they put one condition, which is not to enter Gaza, not to invade Gaza and cause this sort of havoc upon the city. But then Israel said no. Biden could change things and could force Israel not to go ahead with its annexation and its plans of plan and to be seized in place. But again, Biden wants to work, wants to erase Gaza because it's getting benefits from occupying the land,

a very tiny tribe that is full of many resources like gas, etc. Because you can see the pier there that has been built many months ago. It's huge because people are expecting right now, local experts are expecting, geographic experts

are expecting that this pier will be turned into a port, a seaport, to allow the Israeli military or the Israelis to do this sort of commercial transfers between other countries, between Europe and Asia, because Gaza is in Asia. So you can see that, unfortunately, I'm sorry to say this, we're very hopeful people. And I'm just hopeful. I'm only 21 years old, but I can tell you, I've promised myself that I will emerge from this with hope.

Again, I'm not a political person, but what is really happening is first and foremost and always is perpetrated by the US. Israel could not even stay one month in Gaza without the support of the United States. And actually, that might be a good opening here to Rule E4, which is a clip of Code Pink activists, anti-war activists here in the United States some months ago approaching Senator Marco Rubio about his support for the war in Gaza. And this is obviously as Marco Rubio now, this was before, but now is being considered for a Secretary of State role here in the United States. So let's go ahead and roll E4 Marco Rubio's response to the Code Pink activists in the

Senate hallway. Senator Rubio, will you call for a ceasefire in Gaza? No, I will not. On the contrary. Senator Rubio, please. Are you filming it? I want you guys to get this. I want them to in the way. Hamas knew that this was going to lead to this. So Hamas has stopped building their military installations underneath hospitals. So you don't care that 15,000 have died. You don't care about the babies that are being killed every day. I think it's horrifying. I think it's terrible. And I think Hamas is 100% to blame. So that's obviously an ascendant view in the incoming Trump administration. And I'm so. Very representative. Go ahead. I'm sorry to cut you off. No, I'm so fed up with this claim that it's all about Hamas. It's all about what is happening. Like, for example, I'm not Hamas. I have no connection with Hamas. My family doesn't have any relationship with any Hamas members, then why am I being subjected to brutal and sheer

and impure brutality and barbarism and starvation? Then this is the question. A lot of families, the Gaza health ministry has just announced today that Israel has completely wiped out more than 4,500 families with no survivors. Tell me, among the dead toll are more than 17,000 children. Most of them are under five years old. What have they got to do with Hamas? I mean, it's utterly despicable and utterly disgusting that people are still believing

in these things. And again, the Israeli military is forcing the military service upon all those who have exceeded 18 years old in their colony. I'm not going to say territory. But here you have the choice. Never, ever Hamas is going to tell you that you're obliged to belong to us. Never, ever. And we have to know that there are still claiming, talking about, that we can justify

the murder of more than 17,000 children and 10,000 women. I mean, look, I'm truly fed up with that. Like, to the level that even some journalists from The Times, The Sunday Times in the UK and other places like The, have asked me about this sort of things, about Hamas and about others. Already we have nothing to do with that. Like a lot of people here, you talk about that less than 40,000 Hamas fighters. So how many families are in Gaza?

Much, much more, many many many more than that you're talking about more than 200 000 families then why have 40 like 5 000 around 5 000 families being wiped out with survivors like for example i'm going to give you an example like dr maisel as a radius whose name went viral when he was killed along with his wife in Gaza City. He was a chivalry scholar, and he was killed, brutally killed in cold blood, along with his entire family. And they are still under the rug, by the way. A lot of people are still under the rug.

Like, my neighbor's child was bombed, like, November last year. Today, 10 days later from today, it will mark a year. It will mark a year that from the time he was born and he's still under rubble for one year, one whole year. He's five years old. He is a disabled child. And then tell me, what has he got to do with Hamas? Look, it's utterly irritating and I don't know like if you want to justify it again It's very important trying and Millie to be a human for being a journalist If you're not a human then don't be a journalist like it's very simple as that There is a full people that has been exterminated at moment. They have nothing to do with Hamas. Okay?

And don't tell me that Hamas hides behind civilians. Because, look, I'm not trying to say anything about this. But, of course, of course, for me, I don't see anyone around. And I don't know that just the killing, many people, many innocent lives. Like, I've lost my entire aunt's family. Like, I mean, what have I to do with that? I don't know what I can tell you, but it's justifying this. Yeah, and the man, that man is reported to be headed to become Secretary of State

to replace Ant antony blinken you know what has been the reaction uh among people in deribala or others that you've spoken to in gaza to the trump the trump victory in the in the election do people expect it to get worse to stay the same what's the what are people what's the response there's a very good question. Yes, I wanted you to ask me this because they have the same opinion of Trump. He's a genocide-born criminal, and all. Like, we don't have anything. We need to remember that Trump, when he was the president of the United States, he announced and declared Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. And he is responsible for the process of normalization with Arab countries, with Israel. So this is something to remember, that he is a cause for what is happening. Because I'm sure if he didn't do that, our country is in such a very difficult time and in the face of this

sort of extreme adversity, it would really move and act and intervene to stop what is happening on the ground. But I can tell you that even, we don't know about politics, but we have heard Trump does just have a bad reputation on people in Gaza. So it doesn't have any good thing to do with us. And people know and understand, realize that Trump will worsen the situation inside the besieged enclave and that he will kill and be responsible for another virgin, renewed virgin of the genocide

that Joe Biden, the genocide Joe Biden started on October the 7th of last year. And just, I'm curious on a personal level, if you don't mind me asking, it's mid-afternoon there now in Gaza. What have you eaten so far today? And what is your hope for what you might have before the day is over? You can see how the electricity was cut off. This is one of the main things that is happening right now in Gaza. So it's very expected that I'm talking to you, you are in the light and I'm hoping and I'm like a human being i'm a human being i'm supposed to be a human being and i'm just like wishing hoping for a day instead of you like for a moment like give me like a moment of your life of your worst day to me so that i

can feel at least that i'm a human but what vr software is that again it's just like some laws of right you have some if you have it even, and they are made by bug-infested flour, of course, because there is no flour that has been allowed into the strip. But at the same time, we have, like, as I wrote in this piece, we have some, like, sat at this local plate and with some olive oil so that's what we eat every single day and it's just one time so we are making a process here we're making a schedule here you know like we we may not we minimize things so every everyone has a pop

a portion everyone has to eat every single day so not eat you know all day or you know i mean like you can't eat all day there's no way that you can eat all day no it's just a small portion a small part that you can eat all day because you want to maintain what you already have at your home you want to maintain that so if you eat like a little bit more than what is expected, than what is a loaf of bread or something, then you will run out of food. And this is something we want to avoid as people here in Gaza. But as a 21-year-old person, I mean, this is not the first war I've been through. The first five wars in Gaza have been many genocides. Now, this is the biggest genocide I've been through. But I can tell you that I, again, I have hope.

I have hope in people like you that continue protesting and tackling the government every single day. And I hope that things will change because I will never and I can never lose hope at all, at all, because I've been instilled into that, to hope to live, no matter what circumstances are inflicted upon you, no matter what hell is inflicted upon you. We're going to be, and I'm telling you from here, I don't know if I'm going to survive this brutality, this hellish time, but I can tell you that if I, inshallah,

if I survive this, inshallah, which I'm very hopeful about, we're going to be the leaders of a free world. All this young generation has been educated during this time about post-time, about the double standards of the Western community and the hypocrisy of an entire Western media outlet channel and network. They will lead the prosperity of this free work. There will be free work led by us.

So no matter what happens, what is happening, literally, I'm going to sleep, I'm going to breathe hope, and I have everything to keep smiling, no matter what happens and no matter what is happening. Well, I hope that for you abubakar and i know that you've talked about wanting to return to sports journalism um you know which was your which was your love before you were kind of requisitioned into into what you've been doing for the past year i just want to thank you for you know share sharing these stories this perspective with us and and give give you our very best from everybody here.

Yeah. Thank you so much. It was really important and very interesting to talk to you. But again, I just want to tell you one thing in the end. Go for it. It is about you that will lead this change. We hope in you. And please never, ever think about leaving us alone

because you are the reflection of our hope. And I'm 100% confident and proud of your work, Ryan, of your work, Emily. It is your responsibility to lead that change. And that change should be marked by your names. And we're going to make this word free from the United States. That must be free from the United States. Administration, of course, not its people. All the best. We promise we will. And everybody watching should check out

Abu Bakr's latest article over at DropSiteNews.com. Just a very powerful dispatch. Thank you for what you do. We promise we'll keep it up. Inshallah. Bye-bye. All the best. Over the past six years of making my true crime podcast hell and gone, I've learned one thing.

No town is too small for murder. I'm Catherine Townsend. I've received hundreds of messages from people across the country begging for help with unsolved murders. I was calling about the murder of my husband at the cold case. They've never found her. And it haunts me to this day. The murderer is still out there.

Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've learned as a journalist and private investigator to ask the questions no one else is asking. Police really didn't care to even try. She was still somebody's mother. She was still somebody's daughter. She was still somebody's sister. There's so many questions

that we've never gotten any kind of answers for. If you have a case you'd like me to look into, call the Hell and Gone Murder Line at 678-744-6145. Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I think everything that might have dropped in 95 has been labeled the golden years of hip hop. It's Black Music Month and we need to talk is tapping in. I'm Nyla Simone, breaking down lyrics, amplifying voices, and digging into the culture that shaped the soundtrack of our lives.

My favorite line on there was, my son and my daughter gonna be proud when they hear my old tapes. Now I'm curious, do they like rap along now? Yeah, because I bring him on tour with me and he's getting older now too. So his friends are starting to understand what that type of music is. And they're starting to be like, yo, your dad's like really the GOAT. Like he's a legend. So he gets it.

What does it mean to leave behind a music legacy for your family? It means a lot to me. Just having a good catalog and just being able to make people feel good. Like that's what's really important. And that's what stands out is that our music changes people's lives for the better. So the fact that my kids get to benefit off of that, I'm really happy. Or my family in general. Let's talk about the music that moves us. To hear this and more on how music and culture collide, listen to We Need to Talk from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

I know a lot of cops, and they get asked all the time, have you ever had to shoot your gun? Sometimes the answer is yes. But there's a company dedicated to a future where the answer will always be no. Across the country, cops called this taser the revolution. But not everyone was convinced it was that simple. Cops believed everything that taser told them. From Lava for Good and the team that brought you Bone Valley

comes a story about what happened when a multi-billion dollar company dedicated itself to one visionary mission. This is Absolute Season 1. Taser Incorporated. I get right back there and it's bad. It's really, really, really bad. Listen to new episodes of Absolute Season 1. Taser Incorporated, on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Binge episodes 1, 2, and 3 on May 21st and episodes 4, 5, and 6 on June 4th. Add free at Lava for Good Plus on Apple Podcasts. New York mayoral elections are coming up next June. Joining us now is Zoran Mamdani, who's a candidate for election and New York State Assembly member, is that right? Yes, that's correct. Yes, I remember covering your first race,

part of this kind of DSA wave that kind of swept its way into power in New York City and across the state and has kind of reshaped the politics in an interesting way. What gave you the idea to jump from there to running for mayor? You know, the cost of living crisis, to be frank with you. New Yorkers across the five boroughs are struggling to afford even a shred of dignity in their lives. And Mayor Eric Adams has used almost every opportunity to exacerbate that crisis. He has raised rents on more than two million New Yorkers by 9 percent, rates we haven't seen since a Republican was running City Hall. He

has supported Con Ed when they put in an application to raise New Yorkers' utility bills by about $70 a month. And he has sat on his hands whenever he's had the opportunity to provide any kind of relief. And this is a position that New Yorkers should look to as one that gives them respite from the economic crisis in the rest of their life, as opposed to one that is pouring gasoline on the fire that is already consuming them. Now, it's also kind of an interesting position to be in as someone with your politics, where you have a lot of populism. And Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, also someone from the DSA wave, was posting on her Instagram

over the last couple of days asking people who voted for both her and Donald Trump, because she had some split ticket and some shifts in her own district towards Donald Trump, why they saw her, why they would vote for both her and for Donald Trump. If you were talking to a voter who, for example, would be someone maybe who voted for Donald Trump and would vote for you, what's your pitch to them? Even talking about the cost of living crisis, something that is probably very serious for a lot of people who may have voted for Donald Trump. How are you having those conversations basically as a populist? You know, I actually spent much of Sunday on Hillside Avenue in Queens and Fordham Road in the Bronx, which were two of the areas in New York City that swung

most towards Trump, saw even greater drop offs of voting overall. And when I spoke to voters about why, they told me it was cost of living, that they remember having more money in their pocket four years ago, that they couldn't afford their groceries today. And it was despair over war and the genocide in Gaza and a feeling that Donald Trump, as insincere as we know this to be, was the only candidate speaking to them about a desire for a more affordable life and bringing peace back to the world. And these are a lot of the issues, namely the economy and the inability to afford the price points that dominate people's day-to-day lives. And so when I spoke to those voters and I asked them, what would it take to bring you back

to the Democratic Party? Because many of them had previously been voting for Democrats, and they said a focus on these very issues. And so I told them about my mayoral race and my opening promise to freeze the rent for every rent-stabilized tenant, to make buses fast and free for the more than a million New Yorkers who ride them every day, and to bring universal child care into New Yorkers' lives, whether their child is six weeks of age or five years. Because these are the price points that are pushing New Yorkers out of the city that they call home. And so the movement that you've kind of come out of and been a leader of is kind of an entanglement of a couple of different currents. On the one hand, it's the Bernie Sanders. We're going to make sure that you can afford your rent, your college, your groceries. You can make sure you can live a dignified life. And then there's the cultural elements of it, which became associated with a lot of it, defund the police,

abolish ICE, and on and on. When you talk to voters, where do they see kind of that wing of the party coming from? Do they associate it more with we're going to make people's material lives better, or do they associate it more with the other elements that Fox News will talk about and Democratic Party leaders will kind of condemn whenever there's some type of electoral problems for them? Yeah, I would say that Bernie is probably the figure that looms largest in voters' minds when thinking about the left wing of the party. And his response to Tuesday's election is one that has been found to be quite compelling to a lot of these very working class voters that I spoke to, which is a response that the Democratic Party left working class Americans a long time ago and now working class Americans are leaving the Democratic Party.

And I think that it is an association with an inability to afford those day-to-day expenses. And, you know, I would also say that at the same time as nearly half a million New Yorkers, fewer New Yorkers voted for Harris than had voted for Biden four years ago, we also saw the passage of Prop 1, which was a proposal to enshrine reproductive rights and truly civil rights for all, including trans New Yorkers, pass at quite staggering margins across the state. And I think that this is also indicative of the past across the country, which passed on issues that should be central to the Democratic Party. And yet voters trust referendums more than they trust Democrats. And it's time that we ask ourselves, why is that the case? And how can we deliver on those actual issues? And in some sense, obviously, the rumor candidate, Andrew Cuomo,

is the perfect foil to this left populism for all of the reasons. And you're in the State Assembly, obviously very familiar with the Cuomo legacy in Albany. So in what sense or how hard will it be, should he enter the race, to kind of get people's attention? Is it easier to get people's attention because he has so many obvious vulnerabilities politically? But he'll come in with a lot of, you know, built-in media, institutional knowledge within media organizations, an ability to sort of suck a lot of oxygen out of the room for himself. What's that dynamic going to be like for you if that happens? I think Andrew Cuomo knows that the longer he's in this race, the more

difficult it is for him. And that's why he's yet to announce his candidacy, because he doesn't want to expose himself to four, five, six months of an actual inspection of his record. He wants to simply coast on the reputation that he used public dollars to burnish, a reputation he was more interested in than actually saving New Yorkers' lives at the height of COVID. And what I am excited by is the opportunity to tell New Yorkers why we are in the situation we are in. When we're looking at a mental health crisis, here is the former governor who shut down so much of what would have been helpful in this moment to respond to these very crises. Here is the governor that cut hospital beds.

Here is the governor that took an ax to almost every single kind of public institution he could find to ensure that it was not worthy of any funding in the future. And I think it's high time that he understands that accountability is a word that also applies to him. Do you expect him to run as a Democrat or as an independent? As people are gaming this out, what's your path to Democratic domination and and where do you think Cuomo fit into that? I expect him to run as a Democrat, though I wouldn't put anything past Andrew Cuomo, because I think he's more interested in power than anything else. My path to the Democratic nomination is to speak to the working class of New York City. You know, I say this as a socialist, I say this as someone who's running an unabashedly progressive campaign. There are far more New Yorkers who feel left out by the economic policies of Mayor Eric Adams

and Democratic leadership than there are that identify with any one political persuasion. And my goal is to go to every single one of the five boroughs on a regular basis and to speak to those New Yorkers about how we can actually make their lives better, not speak to them about values or ideas, but speak to them about tangible, deliverable policies that we can enact from the very beginning of a mayorality that will literally make their life more affordable. And how are you handling the crime question? Because this is one of the, Ryan kind of asked about this, but it's also, you know, we've seen, like I've been talking to Ro Khanna a couple of times. We asked him about this actually on our show last week in California, New York, obviously.

New Yorkers have some concerns that are similar, just in a material sense, to what people in Northern California, Los Angeles have also been dealing with over the last couple of years. And a lot of people would point, voters might say, well, this is downstream of the defund the police movement, et cetera, et cetera. But just in conversations that you're having across the boroughs, you know, there's obviously room between defund the police and reforming the police and all of that. So where's your conversation going when people bring those concerns to you? You know, most of the time they bring it to me in the context of

public transit. They feel the least safe when they're thinking about subways and buses and things of that nature. And I think it's important to identify that because that means that the solutions to that feeling have to lie within those very places. And one of the reasons that we have been fighting for free buses is, you know, I led and won the first New York City free bus pilot in last year's state budget, where we made one bus free in each borough. And what we saw is that by making that bus route free, assaults on bus drivers dropped by 38.9%.

And these are the kinds of assaults that they are not just assaults on the driver, they are also assaults on the passenger's sense of safety in that moment. And if you're able to fundamentally transform the experience of getting on the bus, getting to where you're going, you feel that much more safe. And I think additionally, one of the reasons that many New Yorkers have identified feeling unsafe when they're taking the subway is the fact that the subway has become the de facto site of mental health crises across New York City. And it's critical that we actually understand that and respond to it in those very places. And what I mean by that is at the same time as right now, where we have many vacant commercial units across the subway system, we could transform those vacant

commercial units into mental health outreach centers. We could actually empower and create mental health responders so that the people that are responding to New Yorkers in crisis are not other New Yorkers or are not police officers, but are people trained specifically for that episode. And what would that cost? What would that look of Community Safety, which would build on the billion dollars every single year, or the Eric Adams proposal to spend $225 million on creating a new cop city in Queens. This is all possible within the fiscal sense. It's just a question of if there's the political will. What about Rikers? It's still open. It's a complete travesty and a disgrace. Why hasn't Rikers been closed yet? How would you get it closed? I think it hasn't been closed because Eric Adams simply has no interest in closing Rikers Island. He has no interest in taking any kind of action beyond that of

impunity when it comes to corrections, when it comes to policing. I have been to Rikers Island many a time. One of the last times I went to Rikers Island, an incarcerated New Yorker tried to take their own life in front of a colleague of mine. That is the level of despair we are talking about on this island. And it is a legal requirement to close Rikers Island in the next mayoral term. But Eric Adams speaks about the law as if it's a suggestion. So what I would do is from the very first day, I would make sure that we are following policies that make that legal requirement a reality and that we actually close Rikers Island. We do so by ensuring that we are keeping New Yorkers safe. And just to the question of cost that has come up, it costs around half a million

dollars to have a New Yorker on Rikers Island. But we are only willing to spend about $50,000 sometimes to house those very New Yorkers, which would keep them out of that kind of a place. I think we have to realign our priorities. One of the obstacles has seemed to be neighborhood opposition to alternatives to Rikers. Like, how do you overcome that? You know, I think one of the key things is there are a lot of people that we are throwing away, putting onto Rikers Island, that are actually need not be in that kind of a facility. They need not even be in a borough-based jail, frankly. And I think what we need to ask ourselves is when there is a woman who is selling cotton

candy outside of a school without a license and the police put her in cuffs and then she's visited by ICE the next day, do you feel safer that she is in a cell? And I think that that's what's so offensive about Eric Adams' policies is they have nothing to do with sense. They only have to do with this sense of impunity on a day-to-day basis. And it stems across multiple agencies how we haven't been willing to create new solutions to problems that have continued through multiple mayoralities. Yeah, it's wild what people are in Rikers for, just sitting there for a year for having stolen like 10 newspapers out of a box or like one guy I know of a sandwich, like just complete insanity.

Anyway, Zorhan, thank you so much for joining us. This is a race we'll be following pretty closely. It's going to be interesting, no doubt. Thank you so much for having me. It's such a pleasure. Appreciate it. You got it. That was Zorhan Mamdani, a mayoral candidate. The thing that makes his race possible actually is matching funds in the New York City mayoral race. So he'll have the resources to get his name out, even without having gigantic billionaires or real estate developers or whoever else behind him. So he's an interesting one to watch. In a crowded race with matching funds, you could argue that's a big advantage to Andrew Cuomo just because of name recognition. Oh, for sure.

Andrew Cuomo, he's going to be in Andrew Cuomo just because of name recognition. Oh for sure Andrew Cuomo You know, he's gonna be in the mix Man might come back. That's for sure. Yeah, that's for sure Also reports from Jake Sherman over at punch bowl that Tulsi Gabbard's in the mix for confirming our reporting here breaking points slash counterpoints that she's in she's in the mix for director of national, pretty obvious that that would be, since it's one of the big foreign policy vacancies and she's yet to have gotten an appointment, that she's in the mix for that. Although it won't, you know, there's little she can do to probably alleviate the trust questions that will linger,

which means if she is appointed to that position and she's not fully trusted by Trump world, that's a pretty interesting dynamic too. Yeah, we'll see. It's going to be exciting. Well, I'll be back here tomorrow replacing Sager. We have a girl show, so I don't know what we can do to compete with the bro show, but we'll do our best. I'm sure it'll be fun. No Friday show this week. No Friday show this week. You guys will be okay though. I think everyone's all right. We'll see you next week. See you then. week. You guys will be okay, though. I think everyone's all right. We'll see you next week.

Emily, we'll see you tomorrow. Bye. I know a lot of cops. They get asked all the time, have you ever had to shoot your gun? Sometimes the answer is yes. But there's a company dedicated to a future where the answer will always be no. This is Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated.

I get right back there and it's bad. Listen to Absolute Season 1, Taser Incorporated on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. I'm Clayton English. I'm Greg Lott. And this is Season 2 of the War on Drugs podcast. Yes, sir. Last year, a lot of the problems of the drug war. This year, a lot of the biggest names in music and sports.

This kind of star-studded a little bit, man. We met them at their homes. We met them at their recording studios. Stories matter, and it brings a face to them. It makes it real. It really does. It makes it real. Listen to new episodes of the War on Drugs podcast season two

on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. The OGs of uncensored motherhood are back and badder than ever. I'm Erica. And I'm Mila. And we're the hosts of the Good Moms Bad Choices podcast brought to you by the Black Effect Podcast Network

every Wednesday. Yeah, we're moms, but not your mommy. Historically, men talk too much. And women have quietly listened. And all that stops here. If you like witty women, then this is your tribe.

Listen to the Good Moms Bad Choices podcast every Wednesday on the Black Effect Podcast Network, the iHeartRadio app, Apple podcast or wherever you go to find your podcast. This is an iHeart podcast.