Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar - 5/24/26: Neocons FREAK As Trump Says Iran Deal INCHES Away

Episode Date: May 24, 2026

Krystal and Saagar are joined by Trita Parsi to break down the latest on a possible Iran deal.   Trita Parsi: https://x.com/tparsi?s=20    To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com    Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is an IHeart podcast. Guaranteed Human. Hey guys, it's us. The Jonas Brothers. I'm Joe. I'm Kevin. And I'm Nick. And guess what? We created our own podcast called, Hey Jonas.

We invented a podcast? Well, we didn't invent it. We just contributed to it. We're the first people to do podcasts. We get to ask other people questions because we're sick and tired of being asked questions. Well, sick and tired is a strong way to put it. But, you know, tired and sick. Tired and sick.

Listen to Hey Jonas on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you. you get your podcast. Just listen. We don't care where you hear it. Another podcast from some SNL late night comedy guy, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and friends. Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier. This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer Streeter Seidel. Help an a cappella band with their between songs banter. Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter. Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and friends on the ice.

Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Why are we all so obsessed with romance? On the Radio 831 podcast, join us, Sanjana Basker and Tyler McCall, as we unpack all the trending tropes, fuzzy adaptations, book talk drama, and celebrity love stories with hot takes and sharp guests. Each episode digs into what these stories reveal about desire, fantasy, identity, and how we love now. Listen to the Radio 831 podcast on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Good morning, everybody. Happy Sunday morning. We have a special edition here of Breaking Point. You know there's a lot going on for our premium subscribers about our shift over to Supercast. But we did have to jump on with our great friend, Dr. Trita Parsi, to break down this potential new deal between Donald Trump and the Iranians after significant regional effort. It does appear at this moment. I guess it's 9 a.m. on Sunday that a deal may be imminent with all of the caveats that that entails.

So Dr. Parsi, thank you so much for joining us. We appreciate you. Let's go ahead and start off. Crystal, can we see the truth? I can read it for everybody. I will skip the long introduction names of all of the foreign leaders that were name-checked here by Donald Trump. But what we see here is I am in the Oval Office.

We just had a very good call. All of these different leaders. Here's what he says is that concerning the Islamic Republican wrong, all things related to a memorandum of understanding pertaining to peace. An agreement has largely been negotiated subject to the finalization between the USA, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and other countries. Separately, I had a call with Prime Minister B.B. Netanyahu of Israel, which likewise went very well.

Final aspects and details of the deal are being discussed. In addition to many other elements of the agreement, the Strait of Hormuz will be open. Thank you for your attention to this matter. So Dr. Parsi, just give us your breakdown here of what you note from the Trump truth and some of the emerging details around this so-called memorandum of understanding, which we believe will last some 60 days. So first of all, there's no misspellings. There is no grammatical errors. There's no attempt at humiliating any side. He's got the title and the names of each of these different world leaders correct.

And I'm mentioning this because before we have seen on numerous occasions, true social post by the president in which he says, hey, we're really close. And it's not a serious post. It is time to work well with the markets, to manipulate the markets. It doesn't have any indication that anyone else has reviewed the post in any way or shape before. This clearly was not written by him alone, although he does have his flavor to it as well towards the end. More importantly, though, when you take a look at all the different world leaders that he consulted with before coming to this conclusion, it's very important because it shows, I mean, what he's trying to do over here is to say, look, we're doing this in tandem with a lot of these different world leaders. And it is true. Many of them have been pushing very hard for this. Some of them have played a crucial role in the background to mediate this compromise that is being reached. Pakistan and Qatar in particular in the later phases of this.

But it also gives them a certain degree of protection here in Washington. We saw the massive meltdown of warmongers last night when this was first announced. And even before it was announced when they were getting noticed that this was coming. They were just in a public panic. And this is despite the fact that they got two wars, they got every conceivable sanction in place, they got the worst rhetoric from Trump. They got efforts to, you know, assassinate leaders inside the countries and the weapons

into the, there's nothing on the wish list of these warmongers that have not been tried and it has failed miserably. Yet they're in a panic over the fact that their miserable failure is now going to be abandoned and are going to go in a different direction. But in that context, for him to be able to say, look, I'm doing it because all of these regional leaders are asking me to do this. is very important not just to be able to show the regional anchoring of this, but also to be able to deflect of the criticism that invariable become,

which is you abandon Israel. Well, perhaps Israel had abandoned the United States by manipulating the United States into this war in the first place. But nevertheless, Israel is not the only country in the region that the United States has some form of a partnership with. And it cannot be the only country that counts. And he's there listing all of these different countries that are going, are telling him to go in this direction.

Seek a peace, put an end to this conflict because it's devastating for the entire region and for the global economy. So all of this, I think, in and of itself, was showing this is much more serious than the previous instances. And then we do have confirmation, both from some of these leaders in the region as well as from the Iranians,

that something is very imminent. So let's talk about what we know, the contours of the deal. You have a great piece up at your subsubstance. stack, which is called Treata Parsi, eponymously, name. Is that the words? Is that the way you use it? In any case, everybody should go and subscribe to see your analysis there, which elaborates on your important post that you also put on Twitter that we all follow very closely. So in any case, you've got a great headline here, war mongers in meltdown as Trump herald's Iran deal.

And you talk about some of the reported details. You say the full details remain somewhat unclear, but according to reporting by on-watch media, much of which I've independently corroborated, the agreement entails a comprehensive cessation of hostilities, including in Lebanon, the gradual release of Iran's frozen assets and an end to America's blockade of the blockade in the Strait of Hormuz. Maritime traffic through the Strait would resume under joint Iranian and Omani oversight. Once these measures take effect, the parties would have an additional 30 days to negotiate a final agreement.

That second stage accord is expected to address both the nuclear issue and the long-term status of the street. Significant progress, however, already appears to have been made. on the nuclear file and as I understand it, broad principles for its resolution have largely been agreed upon. So both the Iranians and Trump saying that they are close to an agreement, we do not have official word yet. What are some of the sticky or thorny issues laid out in your piece here that could still derail progress? Well, I think the main problems are going to come in the second phase because if we take a look at what this memorandum of understanding ultimately does,

it really brings us back to where we were supposed to be when the first ceasefire was struck. It was supposed to be regional. Lebanon was supposed to be included. It was not supposed to be a blockade of the blockade. The strait was going to be open, but it will be under Iran and control for that moment. So we're going back to where we were supposed to be

before FD sold Trump on this idea of a blockade of the blockade, which then created all of these additional problems and further weakened the U.S.'s position. And then we have now. Now, but on top of that, there's two other things. A commitment for a final deal within 30 days, it could be extended to 60, as well as some sanctions relief, release of Iranian assets in the interim,

which seems to be some sort of a goodwill measure that Trump had to give to the Iranian side. But the real test is going to come in the second phase because that's when they're going to have to resolve the nuclear issue. The question of the stockpile is still one that is not resolved, although there's been movement in the right direction. That's going to be tied to a final resolution to the status of the Strait of Hormuz, which also is not fully resolved in this interim stage.

So there's still a lot. And on top of that, I know 30 days is not a lot of time. But my God, it gives the Hawks plenty of opportunities to try to do everything they can to sabotage this deal. The one thing I point out, though, in my piece is that, we may not see that high of a decibel coming from the Israeli side, from Israeli officials. You will have massive decibel, of course, from their proxies in Washington, D.C. But from the Israeli officials standpoint themselves, they may have to choose to be a bit more careful.

And the reason for that is that they are now entering into their election season. And Trump remains very popular in Israel. And as a result, can damage any politician in Israel that chooses to publicly confronts, front Trump over this issue. And I think this is what Trump was hinting at, was it two or three days ago, and what she kind of out of the blue started saying that he's seen the polls and he's at 99% in Israel, and that he actually could run for prime minister, that he may actually run for prime minister in Israel later on.

I think that was a warning sign to the Israelis, telling Israeli officials that I'm so popular, I can be the kingmaker in Israel. And you would be unwise to go after me over this issue. Yeah, thinking about that and the Israeli faction here. There's two things, right? So there's their lobby here in Washington. And we have a taste of that. Chris, I know you have it in the rundown about the neocon freak out. Here we have the former Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo. The deal being floated seems straight out of the Wendy Sherman, Robert Mallee, Ben Rhodes playbook. Pay the IRGC to build a WMD program and terrorize the world, not remotely America first. It's straightforward. Open the damned straight, deny Iran access to the money. take out enough Iranian capabilities so it cannot threaten our allies to the region. Damn, I really wish we'd thought of that, that maybe we'd even tried it. There was another one here from Robert Malley, who was actually one of the negotiators. He's not quite the path, but if this deal brings an end to the unjustifiable, unlawful war,

to the senseless loss of life, and to the cascading fall, I'm sure we'd be willingly accepted over the alternative. I think what's interesting beyond Mike Pompeo and Mark Levine, Mark Dooloward. We have a good Lindsey Graham one here too. Oh, this is my personal favorite. I've been thinking about this all weekend. The amount of times I've read this particular paragraph, which is this, it makes one wonder why the war started to begin with if these perceptions are accurate. I personally am skeptical of the idea that Iran cannot be denied the ability to terrorize

the strait and the region cannot be protected against itself against Iranian military capability. This is prefaced by a if the deal is struck to end the Iran conflict because it's believe the straight of Hormuz cannot be open with terrorism and Iran still possesses the capability, then Iran will be perceived as being a dominant force requiring a diplomatic solution. Yes, Senator, that's true. And I think fundamentally that is, he's like, it's like the worst person you know just made a good point like that mean. But I do think it's important that many of these neocons are grappling with the geopolitical reality that they rot upon us on February 27th. There was no nuclear weapon in Iran. They were not close to getting a nuclear weapon.

The Strait of Hormuz was open. And there was, I mean, I can only speak for myself. I would never have dreamed of the strategic humiliation of the United States that I'd be sitting here on May 24th. But they are the people who chose that. As you said in your opening comments, we tried everything they wanted. We killed their leader. We sort of flooded the country with weapons. We bombed the hell out of them absent, you know, a full-blown bombing of their nuclear power plant infrastructure and a ground invasion, we did everything, even a naval blockade. And we're basically at a point where you're going to get a deal, which easily could have also been obtained on February 27th, minus the strait of Hormuz. So I just think that watching this, you know, watching this rhetoric

escalate in the domestic Israeli lobby side, what they're going to hammer home is what we just laid out here about the humiliation of the United States? I mean, what is your expectation that this rhetoric will not move Trump away from this sort of deal, even though he has all these regional allies who are whispering in his ear in a different direction? It's going to be very tough for him because he's very sensitive to that type of rhetoric. So it really is crucial for him to recognize that he has to show that discipline of sticking to, he can't have it both ways. Either going to have a deal or he's going to have total war. And part of the reason why he's going in this direction, and this is really important to understand, I was on this panel with Joe Ken two days ago and he made this point,

I want to repeat it. If there was a military option for the United States that could turn the tables, that could reverse the situation in favor of the United States, Trump would have used it long time ago. The reason why he hasn't is because it does not exist. And it doesn't matter how courageous Lindsey Graham or Mike Pompeo and Mark Levine sound in their tweets. They're not the ones that are going to be fighting this war. They're not the ones are going to be dying if they manage to convince Trump to go on the suicide mission. But he has had enough of a survival instinct here to recognize that despite the fact

that he's issued threats of this kind, he's not actualized them because he knows it won't work. It will make the situation 100 times worse than it already is. So when we're seeing these things coming from Levine, etc., I hope this is the moment when Trump goes back to what he promised the American people, which was that he was going to kick these people out of government and that he was not going to listen to them, he was not going to go for the endless wars

that they constantly are presenting and pushing on American politicians. There's one other element, though, however, that I think is really, really crucial. The Iranians also have to be very careful here. they cannot repeat what Trump otherwise constantly does, which is constantly tries to humiliate the other side. He had very little sensitivity to the fact that all of these memes and pictures and things that he said during the negotiations

made it more difficult for the Iranians to come to an agreement. Now the Iranians have to be very careful not to collote or do anything that would actually fuel the attacks by the neo-caids on Trump and potentially undermine Trump's ability to deliver on his end of the bargain. And there was a tweet yesterday by the spokesperson of the foreign minister in which he compared this to the ill-fated Roman attempt to conquer Persia back in, I think it was 200 AD something in which they were defeated by the Sassan-Indian king,

Shahputte second, and essentially said that ultimately the Romans had to sue for peace on Yvonne's terms at the time. maybe there is a parallel, but bottom line is don't issue those tweets in this very, very sensitive moment. Let me talk about that later. You do not want to give further fodder to the Lindsay Grahams and others who only want to make sure that this war resumes. Yeah. Trita, looking from the outside, it seems to me that there have been a number of sort of key turning points or revelations during this war from the Trump perspective. So number one, he was clearly convinced himself or sold a bill of goods from the Israelis that, oh, you can just take out the Ayatollah and some top leadership. Whole thing is a, you know, House of Cards that's going to collapse.

Trump was telling allies, and I relied on you for this reporting that, oh, this is going to be over at a few days. Don't worry about it. Obviously, that had to be a little eye opening for him at the beginning. This did not go the way that I was told that it would go. The second one for me appears to have been that pilot rescue or whatever. happened there near Isfahan where, yes, they were allegedly able to get their pilot out, even though we've never known who he is. We've never seen him. We've never heard about him since. But in any case, we know for sure that it was a bit of debacle. You had U.S. aircraft that got stuck

there, had to be destroyed. And I think that may have been an eye-opening moment in terms of, oh, if we do something on the ground, this is going to be very difficult. This is going to be a problem for us because it was right after that that he, you know, began to, you know, began to, pursue or how do we step back and the most intensive bombing campaigns ended. And then this is the piece I really want to get your thoughts on. Potentially, the most recent turning point was the trip to China. It seemed like Trump held out of you that he could go to the Chinese and they would basically save his ass. And when he went there and they were like, listen, buddy, you know, nice to see you, but good luck. That's when he had to get serious about, you know, taking some concessions here.

and striking a deal that, yeah, the warmongers are going to hate, the neocons are going to hate, and that does expose the weakness of the United States ultimately, you know, as we evaluate what the, you know, what this war, quote unquote, achieved on our behalf. And so I wonder if you see it that way. How influential do you think that that trip to China was in ultimately forcing Trump's hand to come to some sort of a negotiated agreement?

No, I do agree with you. Let me say something on the previous point as well, because you're absolutely right. We know very little what happened. We don't even know the names of the pilots. But apparently Hollywood is already making a movie about it. I don't know if you guys saw the story. Oh, I know.

Yeah. The rights have been sold. They're doing a movie about something that we know nothing about. I don't know. Are they just going to make up the facts here or what's going on here? So I thought that was quite fascinating that Hollywood is already on top of it. But also on that point. Hollywood may have been on top of it from the beginning, true.

It may have been. Exactly. Exactly. Perhaps this was their production to begin with. And, you know, I've spoken to folks. This is speculative. I don't know the facts here, but I've spoken to folks on the military side on the U.S. And many of them have pointed to the fact that this appeared to have been a real effort

to go inside of the country and do something to the nuclear facilities, that there was an attempt to either take or build quickly a runway and then manage to fly in a lot of soldiers. So you don't have to do the actual invasion from the south, which would have been impossible. Instead, you're leapfrogging it. You're going into the middle of the country. And it was a disaster. The United States lost more aircraft that weekend since the Vietnam War.

And if you remember, it is about two days after that that Trump first issues, that civilizational threats. And it seems to have had a meltdown on par with Mark Levine right now on true social. And then that evening, the ceasefire is announced. So it seems to have been a scenario in which he tried something very big. It was an absolute disaster. They managed to make sure that much of it is not known to the public. Instead, there's this story about the saving of two pilots, which may have been true. But even if it was true, it seems to have been success within a larger failure.

And then after that, you had the ceasefire. So we've seen this pattern going for broke, not working, and then having. to back off. And I think the China trip was absolutely crucial right before he goes to China and was hoping and remember, the FD crowd sold this to Trump by saying, not only will there be a massive problem inside of Iran, but also this is going to create problems for the Chinese and the Chinese will then turn and put pressure on Iran to back down. Okay. So first, Iran has to crumble and secondly the Chinese were supposedly going to put pressure on Iran. The first part completely false.

Ivan should have crumbled four weeks ago, according to the calculations of FDD. But also, right before Trump arrives in Beijing, the Iranians and the Chinese strike a deal. And Chinese ships are allowed to go through the Strait of Hormuz. The details of it, we don't know, that the Iranians just allowed that entirely, or did the Chinese agree to some sort of a payment system?

Unclear. But it essentially meant that by the time Trump arrived in Beijing, the strait was already open. for the Chinese ship. If they were to be blocked, it would not be by the Iranians. It would be by the United States. And if so, Trump would be picking a fight with the Chinese. And the Chinese would not be putting pressure on Iran

because Iran was not their problem. They would be putting pressure on the United States. Right. And I think he walked away from that and realizing, okay, the FD card was wrong on every point. The Chinese were not going to come on to the US society. And anyone who knew anything about China, and I don't pretend to be a China expert,

would have known that that that. simply not the way the Chinese would have operated. And once that card also fell, then I think we got more serious about trying to get to some sort of a deal. And the structure of this arrangement, which I have to say I'm not a fan of. I'm not crazy about this next 30 days. But nevertheless, that was something that the Yvangis were pushing.

Right. Why are you not a fan of that treatise? Because of this very, very intense window that it provides the hawks to sabotage this. Yeah. And particularly mindful of the fact that a lot of what we're seeing is supposedly agreed upon could have been agreed upon quietly without revealing the 30 days or anything like that and then go for more intense negotiations without offering this type of opportunity,

this silver platter for the hawks to go after this. And the significant vulnerability that Trump will have during this period. Right. I think it's so important. That's what I was about to emphasize is Israel. I don't know if you guys saw what they did in Gaza yesterday. I mean, they lit Gaza up harder than they have in months. And they actually pushed beyond the so-called yellow line area, which they previously hadn't. And I don't think that that's an accident. It's to ignite tensions to ignite and inflame things, potentially to get Hezbollah to start firing back at them, you know, because they're angry about what's happening. And then they can say, see, we have a right of legitimate self-defense in Lebanon. And oh, that just so happens to blow. up the entire deal. I mean, we have 30 days, basically, of potential Israeli sabotage all across the board. And you also highlight an important thing here is we still don't know the details.

When they say the straight will be open, that's Trump. Now, Iran, you can correct me if I'm wrong, has come out and said, the straight will be open under Iranian management. I have no idea what that means. Maybe it's no toll or they have the ability to close it. If they want to, obviously I hope it's the latter. But in terms of how will we see oil and natural gas resume normal flow through the straight over the next 30 days? I don't think so. And so the economic kind of cliff over all of that seems very, very precarious. That's actually my last question to you is the Iranians seem absolutely hellbent on there will be control over the straight. Now control can mean a lot of different things. In your expectation, does it look like a toll management with Oman? Does it look like

a latent deterrent, basically like a nuclear weapon would be in terms of we can do this anytime that we want? How serious are they about exerting their control over the strait? No, I think this has become a new red line for the Iranians. However, I don't think it will be a toll. There's an Omani proposal that has gotten some traction, which is essentially a toll, but it is framed because Atoll would be really illegal internationally in the absence of a war. Instead, it will be an environmental management fee in which countries are paying because there's such a high traffic in that strait. And this would then be collected by Iran and Oman.

However, the U.S. position is one in which they're not crazy about this idea. They prefer it to be regionalized. So it's not just Iran and Oman, but also the other states in the GCC. That would give the Trump administration ability to say it's not the Iranians controlling it. This is the region. It's their region. And they've decided to do this. And, you know, it's just a management fee.

And we can one way or another live with that. So I think, and again, so this issue is not entirely resolved. It will be resolved as part of the 30 days. I don't suspect that the Iranians will give up a degree of control at all. And they can reassert that if there's war again. But there's also another element here, which is part of what the Iranians wanted to do with the control of this trade was that they wanted to force other countries who had left Iranian markets because of U.S. sanctions to now have no option but to trade with Iran again because they would have to pay these fees to get the oil. Perhaps they're not buying anything from Iran, but they're still buying the oil and the gas and whatnot. and as a result, they would need to have that transactional relationship with Iran financially.

Well, if Trump, as part of the final deal, lifts all primary sanctions and the banking sanctions, well, then perhaps that control of this trade for that specific purpose of forcing these countries back into trading Iran is no longer necessary. So I think there's ways to actually resolve this, but it is a point of leverage that the Iranis are not going to give up in the intermediate stage. At the last stage, we'll see exactly how it ends up. But I can see this going in several different directions. Yeah.

Well, that leads to my last question, which is let's assume that this immediate term deal comes together. Let's assume they're able to work out the differences on the nuclear file, that there is some sort of settlement. We figure out on the Strait of Hermuz, lots of big question marks there, as we all know. Let's say, though, that this war concludes along the lines that are being laid out right now. You know, what will this mean in terms of the U.S. position in the world? and changes to the both global and regional balance of power? Well, first of all, the first thing we have to note is that this will be an utter strategic defeat for Israel.

It has started two wars with Ivan, and the end result has been that Ivan has restored its deterrence. It has been revealed that Israel is completely incapable of fighting any war with Ivan without massive active American support and involvement. And even then, it didn't end up well, because Ivan had escalation dominance because of the use of geography. On top of that, the Israelis have destroyed

what little standing they had left amongst the American public. The only demographic that now seems to support them still or be sympathetic to them is boomer Republicans. And in 10, 15 years, there will not be any such thing as boomer Republicans as a major constituency or demographic. All of this is happening. And the Israelis, again, during the next couple of weeks

months are going to be very limited in what they can do to sabotage directly. Indirectly, they will still do a tremendous amount of things. But their ability to publicly challenge or pick a fight with, Trump, I think, is going to be limited. For the United States, this is also going to ultimately be a turning point, I believe. I think we had a brief conversation about this before as well, but I think this is really the inflection point that really puts an end to American global primacy, the ability to sustained that when you cannot even control or have escalation dominance in the Persian Gulf is very, very limited. And beyond that, even if it isn't, even if there's explanations as to why this war went the way it did, the question marks about America's ability, capacity, and competence in

being able to run global primacy is now being spread all over the world, including among some of the allies who have for long time pushed the United States to extend and deepen the United States. that primacy. This is not at all the consequences that we had after the Iraq War. It was a disaster, but no one questioned America's ability to sustain global primacy. That question will be front and center after this war. In my view, however, I have to be very clear. I think it's a good thing for the United States, not to pursue global primacy. It should have stopped pursuing that a long time ago. It's just not that it should have happened this way. Yeah. That's how I view it as well. Dr. Parsi, thank you, as always, for your analysis. Everybody go.

and check out the substack, Treata Parsi. We'll make sure to link in the description as well for more of Treatise analysis. Great to see you, sir. Thank you, sir. Thank you so much for having me. Appreciate it. Yeah, it's our pleasure.

Hey, guys, it's us. The Jonas Brothers. I'm Joe. I'm Kevin. And I'm Nick. And guess what? We created our own podcast called, Hey, Jonas.

We invented a podcast? Well, we didn't invent it. We just contributed to it. We're the first people to do podcasts. We get to ask other people questions because we're sick and tired of being asked questions. Well, sick and tired is a strong way to put it. but, you know, tired and sick, tired and sick.

Listen to Hey Jonas on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. Just listen. We don't care where you hear it. Another podcast from some SNL, late-night comedy guy, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and friends. Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier.

This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer Streeter Seidel help an a cappella band with their between songs banter. Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter. Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and Friends on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. The story I've told myself can then shape my behavior, and that can lead me to sabotage the possibility of connection.

This Mental Health Awareness Month, tune into the podcast deeply well with Debbie Brown if you've been searching for a soft place to land while doing the work to become home. This podcast is for you to hear more. Listen to deeply well with Debbie Brown from the Black Effect Podcast Network on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcast. This is an IHeart podcast. Guaranteed human.