Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar - 5/6/26: Shark Tank Host Faces Data Center Backlash, Nick Shirley Visists Cuba, Trump Attacks Disloyal MAGA, 2026 Dire Job Market

Episode Date: May 6, 2026

Ryan and Emily discuss Shark Tank host faces data center revolt, Nick Shirley says he was almost kidnapped in Cuba, Trump spends millions targeting disloyal MAGA, viral 2026 grad exposes dire job mark...et.   Amed Khan: https://amedkhan.org/amed   Rohit Chopra: https://x.com/ChopraUSA   Timmy McAllister: https://www.youtube.com/@TimmyMcAllister    To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com    Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/   See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 This is an I-Heart podcast. Guaranteed Human. Another podcast from some SNL, late-night comedy guy, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and friends. Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier. This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer, Streeter Seidel, help an a cappella band with their between songs banter.
Starting point is 00:00:23 Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter. Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and friends on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Imagine an Olympics where doping is not only legal, but encouraged. It's the enhanced games. Some call it grotesque.
Starting point is 00:00:42 Others say it's unleashing human potential. Either way, the podcast's Superhuman documented it all, embedded in the games and with the athletes for a full year. Within probably 10 days, I'd put on 10 pounds. I was having trouble stopping the muscle growth. Listen to Superhuman on the IHard Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, what's good, y'all? You're listening to Learn the Hard Way with your favorite therapist and host, Kear Games.
Starting point is 00:01:10 This space is about black men's experiences, having honest conversations that it's really not safe to have anywhere, but you're having them with a licensed professional who knows what he's doing. How many men carry a suit or armor? It signals to the world that you're not to be played with. And just because you have the capability that does not mean that you need to. Listen to learn the hard way on the AHA radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. Hey guys, Saga and Crystal here. Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show.
Starting point is 00:01:44 This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to breakingpoints.com, become a today and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at breakingpoints.com. One of the biggest data center projects, this one in Utah, that you can possibly imagine, is moving forward. Let's see, 62 square miles of desert getting carved up for, you know,
Starting point is 00:02:24 I guess to jack up your electricity bills. You would use more power than the entire state of Utah. It's like 62 square miles. And getting a tax break. Of humming data center? Yeah. Like, look at that thing. I don't even know what to say about that.
Starting point is 00:02:41 Look at that. Look at that beautiful, beautiful chunk of land. Locals out there looked at it and we're like, yeah, don't think we want this either. Did not seem to matter. Let's roll a little bit of C2 here. False. All of this is false. Then why won't they let people talk? Why won't they let talk that?
Starting point is 00:03:04 It's false. This is not real information. And we sit here like it's okay. It's a charade. It's a charade. It's false. So despite this kind of outpouring of opposition, the project is continuing to move forward.
Starting point is 00:03:31 Also, environmental concerns being spelled out in roll C3 here. How are you offsetting these environmental concerns? Well, I'm actually the only developer of data centers on Earth that graduated from environmental studies. So I'm pretty aware of what these concerns are. They are around air, water use, heat, noise, pollution. So sustainability is at the heart of what we do in terms of all these proposals. Not just Utah.
Starting point is 00:04:03 We have 10,000 acres in Alberta, Canada. the same concerns. And so we search for the best technology. There's many air-cooled turbines now. So you're blending in air-cooled versus water. There's so many different ways to generate power. We can also put a percentage of the power generation through solar, wind, and batteries, because the battery technology is 10x more efficient than it was just five years ago. So that's very helpful because it makes the cost of energy lower. So if you're environmentalist and you don't care about that stuff, of course you protest and that's what happens. I noted, you know, what's happening in Utah right now is we think over 90% of the protesters are actually not
Starting point is 00:04:47 people that live in Utah or Box Elder County. They're being bused in. Oh goodness. Yeah, I don't know what I think of this new trend of even like the data center guy. Kevin O'Leary of strike tank and Party Supreme. Like doing the car thing. I mean nobody trusts you if you like have over-processed videos now and they've discovered that. They're even wearing commercials, not in this case, but like, have you started to see some commercials that are filmed like they're on a phone? It's really something. So unless you're like Kyle Kalinsky coming back from the golf course with Crystal, nobody wants to hear. Nobody trusts you. Nobody trusts you. Unless you're Kyle and Crystal en route. Nobody trusts your take. Of course, all of this is
Starting point is 00:05:26 propped up by an inflated bubble. Put up C-5 here. Bloomberg has a nice little graphic. This is crazy. Tries to explain how the money is flowing through here. And to help us walk through this, we're lucky enough to be joined by Rohit Choper, who's the former director of the Consumer Financial Protection Board, also a former FTC commissioner. What's your current gig now that Trump threw you out of this CFPB? Because I don't want to, we don't want to just do formers.
Starting point is 00:06:00 Rohit, welcome the show. What are you up to now? Well, I'm helping out our state attorneys general actually prosecute some of this wrongdoing that the federal agencies are just watching as crime is committed all over the country. It would have been really funny, Rohit, if your answer was, I'm spearheading massive data center construction. Data center consulting. No, Rohit is one of the people that keeps corporate America up at night.
Starting point is 00:06:27 The foul language that people like Jamie Don't. I'm going to have had for Rohead, I think, speaks to, speaks quite well to him and to the analysis that he's able to give here. So, first of all, this Utah Data Center project, am I an idiot? Like, why are they putting these things out in the desert, first of all, when the big problem is overheating? Am I the first person to think of that? Well, here's what we're seeing across the country massive, actually, competition from all of these states and localities to hand out tax breaks in order to subsidize these very massive real estate developments.
Starting point is 00:07:15 And I think you're seeing an unending thirst for power when it comes to keeping going this AI machine. there is even analysis from Goldman Sachs that is suggesting that AI is contributing to all sorts of increased consumer prices, whether it is the increased cost of electricity that some people believe is a result, the increased demand for electronic equipment and chips, as well as a whole other set of costs. So you're starting to see a lot of pushback, especially because some of the traditional arguments, for subsidizing these developments, like creating lots of jobs, aren't necessarily materializing. While it takes people to construct these data centers, if you walk through some of them, you'll see there's very few people working at them. Have you done that before, right? You've walked through the data centers? I've seen a data center. I've seen it's actually, it's quite extraordinary in some ways to see
Starting point is 00:08:22 the sheer volume of electronic equipment, the need to cool some of this and the need to just kind of keep it going 24 hours a day. And I think we forget that every time we are opening an app or streaming a show, that is really resting on those behemoth data centers. So on that point, Trump takes office, CFPB, you're gone. CFPB is now a shell of its former self. Basically was doged, which was a plan of the conservative movement long before Doge, of course. But one of the things that you were doing, and correct me if I'm wrong at the CFPB, was starting to pay really close attention to the consumer effects of cryptocurrency. And I think one of the reasons, cryptocurrency and just financialization and the like,
Starting point is 00:09:11 and I think one of the reasons that people are so mad about what started to happen with the data centers is that they look around and they say, for what? What is all of this, all of this is for schemes, whether it's, I mean, crypto isn't directly related to this, or maybe it is. And you correct me if I'm wrong. But like, it's all to that Bloomberg piece. We were just, we just had up on the screen. It's all like Microsoft funding invidia to fund Microsoft. Like, it's all, it all feels fake to people.
Starting point is 00:09:41 It all feels like it's for the sake of people who are going to be fine no matter what, just like what happened in the Great Recession. They are going to survive. many of them are going to survive. Average people are going to be screwed once again. And so some of it, I think, just comes from this anger about what's building up, the froth that's building up in the economy. Yeah, you know, there's a concept that we talk about on Wall Street. It was, I think, coined by a Bloomberg journalist, number go up, which is really this push,
Starting point is 00:10:09 no matter what type of asset you're referring to. There's a, they want the number to go up. And we have seen it in the data. the top 1% of Americans now own over 50% of the stock market and mutual fund assets in the U.S. And if you look at the portion of what we refer to as the Magnificent 7, those big tech companies, NVIDIA and others, they are a larger and larger and larger share of the overall stock market. So we're in a situation now, and I'll tell you something. just in one quarter recently, just baby boomers saw their wealth increase by a trillion dollars.
Starting point is 00:10:58 And this is due to some of these stock market gains. So we're in a situation where the economy is now in some ways resting on these big asset prices. And many people are wondering, are these asset prices really real? You mention what's called circularity. This is where a group of companies... Let's put C5 back up while you're talking. Yeah, so people can look. Yeah, these group of companies are really kind of all in deals with each other.
Starting point is 00:11:33 Some of it is related to services like cloud. Some of it is related to chips, the things that, you know, Nvidia makes. Some of it is actually investment. So there is really this web, and honestly, this Bloomberg graphic, doesn't even begin to show some of it. You are seeing that in some cases, an enormous part of even the cloud infrastructure is increasingly being paid between these companies.
Starting point is 00:12:04 And what's interesting is that it is not necessarily they're paying cash. They're entering into deals, financing, and equity deals that are really tying some of these firms. together. So we don't really know, is this a situation where if one problem occurs, will it have a ripple effect? I think earlier you mentioned what happened in the financial crisis. The regulators had no clue about the linkages between the big banks, between some of these credit default swaps, insurance companies like AIG, and the result was a mess.
Starting point is 00:12:46 And I think we're starting to worry that maybe there isn't a big problem here, but is anyone really looking? Because it seems like most of the regulators in Washington are worshipping at these companies' altars rather than actually kicking the tires to see if there's a bigger issue on our hands. And so what happens if the revenue expectations of an OpenAI or an anthropic start to not meet? We're already seeing signs of this. OpenAI, I think, has delayed its timeline for a IPO, where they go public. Anthropics, I think we still don't have a firm timeline on it. And many analysts believe this is because OpenAI is not showing the level of revenue that the street expects. So this is the worry. You have a set of companies that are an overwhelming share now of the stock market, over a third of the stock market, and you have all that wealth really concentrated at the upper echelons of the economy. And they are driving. Those wealthy individuals are driving a huge amount of spending. If we start seeing the stock market values of these companies go down, will they, they all face a correction and what will the ripple effect be through the economy? I think that's really what a lot of people, both on Wall Street and who follow the economy
Starting point is 00:14:24 closely, are really, really curious about. And if we could talk a bit about the consumer end of this, Rohit, I'm curious, you know, some of the stuff you all were doing at the CFPB to steal man the conservative argument. It was you didn't need the CFPB. The CFPB could sort of be folded into all. other agencies that already existed. So if we take that seriously for a moment, I'm curious, if you believe that some of those responsibilities have adequately been folded into other
Starting point is 00:14:55 oversight bodies and what risk, I'm assuming you're going to say no, what risk then consumers find themselves in with a basically empty CFPB and some of this real economic change happening kind of under everybody's noses right now. Well, let's look at the proof. While I was in office and even before, the CFPB was regularly returning billions of dollars. I think on average, it was over $3 billion a year. And really some serious fraud.
Starting point is 00:15:33 I think we've basically seen zero. I can't even tell you when the last time, they took an action. It has mostly been to gut the place. So I think the arguments that someone else would do it just haven't held up. Here's the thing, Emily, that I think we've got to really think hard about. It's one thing about, you know, going after fraud, returning money to people. The big, big work is often preventing the next meltdown or crisis. Had there had been, I think, think some real scrutiny of subprime mortgages, we wouldn't have gotten into the big, gigantic mess from 2008 that, honestly, we are still feeling aspects of today, both politically and
Starting point is 00:16:23 economically, including in our housing costs. But I really wonder, these Alphabet Soup agencies, are they asking any questions? Are they actually looking at anything? Or are they simply just doing deals to scratch the backs of political supporters. We're seeing this at the FTC when it comes to mergers, waving mergers through where there is a politically connected lobbyist and going hard on firms that might be enemies of the administration. And what I say to all my conservative friends is that I really thought you guys didn't want the government picking winners.
Starting point is 00:17:10 and losers. That is really how Russia and China often work. I thought we were about letting people build and create and not just deciding and crowning corporate royalty. I'm worried we're shifting toward that. And let's see if there is a broad spectrum of people across the ideological spectrum who just say no. and we're tired of it.
Starting point is 00:17:41 Yep, picking a lot of tech companies as winners in particular. And Rohit Chopra, I also wanted to ask you to kind of unpack for us a little bit, this fight that's going on between Wall Street banks on the one hand and crypto companies, on the other hand, that seem to be attempting to act like banks. It looks like they want to start taking deposits and paying interest on deposits, but without being kind of regulated as, as banks, which, you know, the nice thing that we got out of the Great Depression was the FDIC,
Starting point is 00:18:14 and you put your money into a bank. And if the bank goes under, as Americans, we're not actually worried that we're going to lose our deposits. And so therefore, we don't rush and we don't create runs on those banks. So Tom Tillis, maybe we can add this in pose, but Tom Tillis and Angela also Brooks, the Tom Tillis Republican of North Carolina, also Brooks, Democrat from Maryland putting together a proposal that they thought had reached some type of compromise between Coinbase and the crypto world and Wall Street, but that seems to have kind of unraveled a little bit. So can you unpack for us? What are the different camps arguing for? And I wonder, so Coinbase just laid off, what, 14% of its staff. And I wonder if they were waiting to
Starting point is 00:19:03 kind of reach a deal and then went for this. massive layoff, setting that aside, what is this fight over? Yeah, so look, Ryan, you know, I'm not some kind of unvarnished cheerleader for banks. I think we got to scrutinize them carefully, but let's be honest, we do need banks in our society. We need a place where we can pool our deposits and that we can get loans on everything from building factories or starting a dry cleaner, or pizzeria, that's what banks do. The banks are arguing that the crypto companies that are wanting to start these crypto dollars or stable coins, they call it, that they're going to put money in those coins and that it is
Starting point is 00:19:55 going to drain the banks of deposits who they would otherwise use to lend. And so what the battle is about here is can those stable coin companies or crypto dollars, can they pay interest on the deposit? The argument, if they pay interest, there will be lots of flight from banks to those stable coin issuers. And the argument from the stable coin issuers is that the banks, they can just compete and raise their interest rates too. So this sounds actually like it's a debate about crypto. It's really not. It's really a debate about what is the future of our banking system. Is our banking system going to be one where we put money in deposits and that leads to lending,
Starting point is 00:20:52 but we can always get our money back, as you said, Ryan, or are we going to have something a little bit different? I really worry that this is not becoming a debate about farm lending and mortgage lending and national security and sanctions. Instead, it seems a little bit more about a fight that's just jockeying between two big industries shooting at each other. But the truth is that if you look at what is happening about big questions about the future of the dollar, trade, the financial system, the future of the Fed, these are all linked. And you just don't see a lot of coverage about this. So we got to all get smart and make sure this is not just a lobbying frenzy between industries, but we're choosing what is right for America. So what does a world look like if we're doing crypto dollars instead of dollars? And the stable coin push from the Trump administration, which is enriching to them as well, by the way. But remember when with the tariffs, what Trump brought him from the brink was the bond market's
Starting point is 00:22:05 getting, quote, a little yippy. And I don't think anybody totally understands what they're trying to do with the dollar in the long term. Well, here's really one of the best cases they're trying to make is that by issuing these stable coins, they're going to attract more demand for dollars. And therefore, that will mean more purchases of U.S. Treasuries, which will then make our debt cheaper. I wrote a piece last year that really questioned some of that assumption because I do think a lot of the funds that will power these stable coins will actually just come.
Starting point is 00:22:47 from U.S. consumers and businesses, when I send a Venmo or a cash app, I'm not thinking about, is it in a stable coin? Is it in a bank deposit? I just expect it to work. This is not going to be so clear to consumers. And I want to make sure that if something went down, if there is a crisis that people will not panic and that they will be able to get their money. back. That is something that is so key for confidence in our economy. And I would hate to see those who really live paycheck to paycheck all of a sudden, or a small business, all of a sudden lose everything because what their money, that their money is not really stable. We're so cooked.
Starting point is 00:23:38 No, no, no. It's not we're cooked. We just got to get smarter and we got to get our voices in the arena and we can't just be passive observers. Yeah, who are the smart? Like, who are the people on the right side of this who are actually, who actually get it in Congress now? Well, you know, what's funny is I think actually a lot of them do get it, but many are worried about what they can say out loud. Right.
Starting point is 00:24:05 I think they see huge lobbying interests. Crypto's going to come from. Yeah, and I think that is something that is something that is something that. politicians, you know, we want them to all be courageous to do the right thing, but we know the power of these big arsenals of lobbying money. We're seeing it in AI as well, where the AI, you know, companies are forming lobbies to really destroy any state legislator or local politician who is even speaking up against data centers or trying to put some basic protections on the book. So this is why we can't just, we can't just observe.
Starting point is 00:24:52 We got to be in on it. Rohit Chopra. Imagine an Olympics where doping is not only legal, but encouraged. It's the enhanced games. Some call it grotesque. Others say it's unleashing human potential. Either way, the podcast's Superhuman documented it all, embedded in the game. games and with the athletes for a full year.
Starting point is 00:25:13 Within probably 10 days, I'd put on 10 pounds. I was having trouble stopping the muscle growth. Listen to Superhuman on the I-Hard Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. My mother-in-law spent years sabotaging our relationship until karma made her pay for it. Wait a minute, Dakota. How bad did it get? Well, it got bad enough that her son-in-law had to eventually arrest her himself. She moved in for two weeks, lasted for five.
Starting point is 00:25:40 She left nail clippings in the bathtub, candy stuck the furniture, and then she pressed her ear against the bedroom door and burst in screaming. She did not burst in while they were. She did. They kicked her out and paid for her hotel, and they thought, it's finally over. Days later, she called her son-in-law at work, claiming that his partner had been in some kind of freak accident
Starting point is 00:25:58 and had been rushed to the hospital in an ambulance. He called every hospital in the city, and his partner was making coffee the entire time. She faked a medical emergency just to test whether or not he loved her son? Yeah. And she sat in the hospital parking lot waiting for him to see if he would show up. When that didn't work, she walked into the son-in-loss police station and filed a kidnapping report against him. She filed a kidnapping report against him in his own police station.
Starting point is 00:26:23 And spoilers, karma's going to show up in the best way possible. So if you want to hear how this story ends, search OK Storytime on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to podcasts. You can have opinions. You can have like a strong stance. And then there's your body having its own program. I'm Dr. Maya Shunker, a cognitive scientist and hosts of the podcast, a slight change of plans, a show about who we are and who we become when life makes other plans. We share stories and scientific insights to help us all better navigate these periods of turbulence and transformation.
Starting point is 00:27:02 There is one finding that is consistent, and that is that our resilience rests on our relationships. I wish that I hadn't resisted for so long the need to change. We have to be willing to live with a kind of uncertainty that none of us likes. Listen to a slight change of plans on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Thanks so much for joining us. Former Director of the CFPB, former chairman or former commissioner on the FTC, much appreciated. Thanks for having. the conservative movements
Starting point is 00:27:44 Woodward and Bernstein turned up in Havana. Both in one person? Both of them. Two and one, all right. Takes two to match the wits. One, Nick Shirley. Nick Shirley, however,
Starting point is 00:27:56 running into a little, running into a few problems in Havana. Here he is from a sanctioned a Havana hotel. I think through sheer ignorance, Nick Shirley is confronting the absurdity of American sanctions, by staying in a hotel he is definitely not allowed to be staying in.
Starting point is 00:28:16 So critical support to Comrade Shirley here, who is facing difficult circumstances. Let's roll this video that Nick Shirley actually produced. This is not AI or made up or anything. Let's roll some Nick Shirley. All right, depending when this comes out or if it does, we are currently being told by Cuban intelligence here in Havana, Cuba.
Starting point is 00:28:45 I came here. I've been wanting to make a video for so long about life and communism and showing people what communism is like in a place like Cuba, for instance. I go out at the airport. They sees all of my cameras. They sees both my GoPro's, my meta glasses. These are not my meta glasses. All my microphones.
Starting point is 00:29:07 However, the only thing they don't take is my eye. That's what I'm filming this on right now. They don't take my iPhone camera and somehow they didn't get this microphone that was in the very, very bottom of my backpack. We're filming this video and when we're next to the hospital, we see undercover cop roll up on us and my security guards that are with me. They detected him and then all of a sudden there's another one. So we hop back in another taxi, we left the scene and we thought we were good. They didn't tell us and we left. But since we left the airport, we had been getting tiled.
Starting point is 00:29:41 Or the word had gotten out that there was a journalist inside of Cuba. There's only two flights that come in here every single day. So it wasn't hard to spot out who the journalist was. And we have Cuban intelligence down in the lobby of the hotel right now, working to essentially try to round us up and potentially imprison us or make it so we cannot leave Cuba. So the interesting thing about that video, one of them at least, them at least. When I went over there recently, there was this massive hullabaloo about the fact that we stayed in a quote-unquote five-star hotel. When you have a giant group of Americans who are traveling to Cuba, there are only a couple of hotels that you're allowed to stay. And you can stay in their version of kind of Airbnbs. But spreading 700 people out around those would be rather logistically difficult. So among the hotels that you're allowed to stay in, there's only a couple.
Starting point is 00:30:38 because they can't have, you know, connections to the Cuban government. He's staying in one that is fully 100% sanctioned. I don't think he's deliberately violating American sanctions and supporting the communist Cuban. The argument is by staying there, he's supporting, you know, the tyrannical communist government. And so therefore, he shouldn't be staying there. And it's a crime.
Starting point is 00:31:04 What's the statute of limitations? would be funny if President Platner rolls in and... Because after Nick Shirley. And like lifts sanctions on Cuba but also prosecutes Shirley for violating them while they were still in place. So good for Shirley for showing the absurdity of these American sanctions. Now, so he's there doing some reporting. I think his mom is sort of like his handler, right?
Starting point is 00:31:31 She's kind of... He's guided him. I thought they traveled together, yeah. I'm much anger at his mom than him. He doesn't have any idea what he's doing. You can't be upset with him. Yeah. He is challenged.
Starting point is 00:31:46 We weren't going to make the joke about literacy being Cuba's one strength. He's bringing down the literacy rate in Cuba single-handedly. I wasn't going to make the joke, but I was going to tee you up to make the joke. But I'm upset with his mom. His mom should have been like, well, you can't just bring in a whole bunch of equipment and start filming in Cuba. Like, there's a process you have to go through with the government to get a visa connected to doing journalism. If the Chinese tried to send their leading propagandist to, like, make videos here in the United States. We'd roll out the red carpet.
Starting point is 00:32:26 Well, we would also... We would follow them. We would follow them. Yeah. And there are ways, like, you can't just come in on a... You're not supposed to just come in on a tourist visa. do it. There are processes, forms are supposed to fill out. Now, obviously, Cuba has stacks and stacks of forms. They are, that's what they are. Well, and nobody, except for, like, maybe, I mean,
Starting point is 00:32:48 you can correct me if I'm wrong, but maybe people who are sort of still avowed Marxists, nobody really tries to claim that the Cuban government isn't repressive and is not going to follow foreign journalists. And that the process... Everyone would agree that repressive, the question is, like, some would argue maybe it's good. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, that's... That's a good point. But it's obviously a repressive country. Again, even some of the people who are arguing against sanctions and the like. They have tight rules around speech and media. They have artists in political prison, like, yes. And so Nick Shirley coming up. If you want to interview somebody at the University of Vana, who's a high profile person, like, that's a government university. And you have to then get permission from like the government to interview. Like, not the kind of system that I, as a journalist, prefer.
Starting point is 00:33:34 Which when you came back from Cuba, we talked about all of this. Like, we talked about the process. We talked about how you were able to do those tours of the hospitals. But it's also not a mystery, like what Cuba is, apparently to anybody other than Nick Shirley. So I hope the Cuban government takes mercy on poor Nick Shirley. Truly. He knows not what he does. So Marco Rubio gave a briefing yesterday, and I think it's worth rolling this side.
Starting point is 00:34:03 This is going to be D4. Mark Rubio did at the White House briefing yesterday. And both Rubio and Trump continue to talk about what could be coming imminently for Cuba. Trump, obviously, infamously said that he may have the privilege of taking Cuba very soon. Here is Secretary of St. Rubio at the White House yesterday. There's no oil blockade on Cuba per se. Here's what's happening with Cuba. Cuba used to get free oil from Venezuela.
Starting point is 00:34:25 I used to give them a bunch of free oil. They would take like 60% of that oil and resell it for cash. It wouldn't even go to benefit the people. So the only blockade that's happened is the Cubans have decided, I mean, the Venezuelans have decided we're not giving you free oil anymore. And you can only imagine nowadays the way oil prices are, no one's giving away free oil, much less to a failed regime. So the problem of Cuba is worse, okay? Their economic model doesn't work. It doesn't work.
Starting point is 00:34:49 And the people who are in charge can't fix it. And the reason that I can't fix it is not just because they're communists. That's bad enough, but they're incompetent communists. Okay. So he also Southcom's Twitter. I can't believe that's the thing I'm even saying, but Southcom's, I guess, X account, posted a very calculated image of Secretary Rubio yesterday, D2, posing in front of a map of Cuba with General Francis Donovan, quote, their discussions, according to Southcom focused on U.S. efforts to counter threats that undermine security, stability, and democracy in our hemisphere. Absolutely no mistake that they're shaking hands in front of a giant map of Cuba, Ryan. Yeah, and he was asked about that in his press conference, and he said, yeah, that was to send a signal.
Starting point is 00:35:30 Also, what he said in that clip is just a flat-out lie. Forget Venezuela. Mexico and every other country that wants to sell oil to Cuba, not give it away, sell it, is told that they're not allowed to do that by the United States. I don't know why he keeps telling this lie so confidently, but he does. Russia brought a tanker there and Trump allowed it to go through. The fact that Trump had to say that he was allowing a Russian tanker to go to Cuba tells you that there is a blockade. If there was no blockade, Trump would have nothing to do with a transaction between Russia and Cuba.
Starting point is 00:36:16 Meanwhile, a little bit of news that came out yesterday, Cuba finalized a massive reform of its immigration system, a huge loosening of it. previously they weren't they didn't allow dual citizenship for the most part and if you were gone for a certain amount of time that was kind of a de facto renunciation of your citizenship immigration law is always complex so it might have the details slightly off here but the the loosening allow it's going to allow dual citizenship and it's going to allow Cubans who have gone to not just the US but you know Brazil Costa Rica Nicaragua you name it to go back and forth it will also allow them to spend money that they have earned in you know Central or South America or the North America
Starting point is 00:37:12 back in back in Cuba and then to go and then to go again so it's a it's a huge liberalization of their of their immigration policy, which is interesting. And it's, it comes at a time as hundreds of thousands of people on, as Trump and then Biden really ratcheted it up that the, the boot on the neck of the Cuban economy, hundreds of thousands of Cubans have, and millions at this point over maybe five, six years, have fled. Right.
Starting point is 00:37:45 Cuba. And so what, what this is saying is that if they want to come back, it's, it's, it's, the way I read it if they want to come back, they can do so. And they don't have to stay either. They can come back and visit and go back. So, anyway, that's... And bring, I guess, potentially bring stuff for people suffering. Bring stuff and bring money.
Starting point is 00:38:04 Yeah. Because, and to... It's a flight from Miami to Havana. It's easy. Or from Costa Rica or wherever else they are. Because they're, like, Cubans are doing pretty well in other countries. Yes. Because they all got this...
Starting point is 00:38:19 Yeah, Haitians too. this um but cubas in particular because they got this really good education in cuba um and so they're able to then outperform um other people in like brazil or columbia or costa rica or whatever um when i was in cuba i was talking to some people there who was who were saying it was ironic that a lot of their friends who have left and done really well um have turned right wing and they're like they're the ones who stay in here like it's a little annoying because they got this socialist education and then use that to do well in these countries where education is not a priority and have kind of forgotten how they got there.
Starting point is 00:39:00 But that's because there's real genuine animosity towards the sclerotic Cuban government. Yes, right. Well, we'll see. We'll, of course, be paying close attention to the plight of Nick Shirley, the education of Nick Shirley and the like in all seriousness though we hope that he's okay and safe because that can get hairy very quickly
Starting point is 00:39:24 as you know Ryan imagine interrogating Nick Shirley about anything about anything I'm sorry I'm sorry Ryan I would like to see you do that for the record
Starting point is 00:39:38 Nick come on Ryan will talk to you yeah sure yeah let's do it Imagine an Olympics where doping is not only legal but encouraged. It's the enhanced games. Some call it grotesque. Others say it's unleashing human potential.
Starting point is 00:39:55 Either way, the podcast's Superhuman documented it all, embedded in the games and with the athletes for a full year. Within probably 10 days, I'd put on 10 pounds. I was having trouble stopping the muscle growth. Listen to Superhuman on the I-Hard Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. My mother-in-law spent years sabotaging our relationship until karma made her pay for it. Wait a minute, Dakota.
Starting point is 00:40:21 How bad did it get? Well, it got bad enough that her son-in-law had to eventually arrest her himself. She moved in for two weeks, lasted for five. She left nail clippings in the bathtub, candy stuck to the furniture, and then she pressed her ear against the bedroom door and burst in screaming. She did not burst in while they were. She did. They kicked her out and paid for her hotel, and they thought, it's finally over.
Starting point is 00:40:43 Days later, she called her son and she called her son. Law at work claiming that his partner had been in some kind of freak accident and had been rushed to the hospital in an ambulance. He called every hospital in the city and his partner was making coffee the entire time. She faked a medical emergency just to test whether or not he loved her son? Yeah. And she sat in the hospital parking lot waiting for him to see if he would show up. When that didn't work, she walked into the son-in-law's police station and filed a kidnapping report against him. She filed a kidnapping report against him in his own police station.
Starting point is 00:41:13 And spoilers, karma's going to show up in the best way possible. So if you want to hear how this story ends, search OK story time on the Iheart radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to podcasts. You can have opinions. You can have like a strong stance. And then there's your body having its own program. I'm Dr. Maya Shunker, a cognitive scientist and hosts of the podcast, a slight change of plans, a show about who we are and who we become. when life makes other plans. We share stories and scientific insights
Starting point is 00:41:47 to help us all better navigate these periods of turbulence and transformation. There is one finding that is consistent, and that is that our resilience rests on our relationships. I wish that I hadn't resisted for so long the need to change. We have to be willing to live with a kind of uncertainty that none of us likes. Listen to a slight change of plans on the I-Heart
Starting point is 00:42:13 radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. All right, we got big election updates to get to. So let's start now in Indiana. We can talk about this. We'll just put this New York Times tear sheet up on the screen because it kind of gives a broad overview of everything that happened last night. Big election results around the country, quote, President Trump's efforts to oust Republicans deemed insufficiently loyal faced a key test on Tuesday's Indiana voters decided whether to back
Starting point is 00:42:44 state senators who opposed redistricting in whom the president. the president wanted out. All right. Now, the Times also said his political playback campaign, Trump's, is going to extend later this month to clashes in Georgia, Kentucky, and Louisiana. But in Indiana, these are primaries. We're not actually even talking about the general elections yet. The Times says several Republican-led states quickly fell in line last year when Mr. Trump demanded redrawn maps. You may remember that Indiana Republicans tried to push back against that. So, quote, when lawmakers returned to Indianapolis in December, the House approved a new map, which would have positioned Republicans to flip the state's two Democratic held congressional seats. But the Senate said no, and a slim majority of Republicans joined all Democratic senators to vote the bill down.
Starting point is 00:43:32 Those senators who were on the ballot for re-election, not all of them were, but the ones who were faced, I've seen estimates between $8 million and $12 million from Trump groups, like national. Trump groups, basically, and not even secretly, but very openly, who then said, okay, that's it, you're gone. And basically all of them ended up losing, with the exception of one, as of right now, losing their primary battles last night. So brutal day for Indiana Republicans who wanted to push back against Trump, basically. Again, as of now, just one who is clinging to, in a high-profile race, who's clinging to the seat. But, you know, the way that I would describe this, we're in an arms race now on gerrymandering.
Starting point is 00:44:27 There's no question about it. This was after Texas, which then you saw California, and the redistricting has been going on in states. And propelled by the Voting Rights Act decision, because that opens up. Yes, rejoining. redistricting possibilities everywhere from Alabama to Mississippi to Tennessee. Right. Because what they can do is they can just eliminate the Civil Rights Act or the Voting Rights Act required basically majority black district. I'll just carve up the black voters and dilute them into a bunch of white districts.
Starting point is 00:45:03 Right. And so six of the eight who refused to do the gerrymandering, We're gone last night. They have time to do it before November or that, well, they're still in office. Right, yeah, some of them are, yeah. But they'll do it for 2028. Yeah, yeah, I see what you're saying. Yes. And just to, again, the argument from Jim Banks and Trump Republicans is that you can't do unilateral disarmament.
Starting point is 00:45:32 Or you can't, yeah, that's not happening, right? So it's not possible. And the only, if you're going to make like a moral pension type stand on the principle, against redistricting, at this point, there is no, you're not the bulwark against national redistricting just because you say Indiana won't do it. And so Trump people, and obviously Indiana voters, for the most part, looked at that and said, yeah, this is BS. You guys aren't stopping redistricting. It's happening whether you like it or not. And what you are doing is just saying, we're disarming ourselves and giving Dems more seats in Indiana. So I think that's a pretty compelling
Starting point is 00:46:08 argument to most voters, everybody hates redistricting. Maybe. Everybody hates it. Everybody hates it. They started it in Texas. Like they didn't have to do this mid-district, a mid-cycle redistricting in Texas, and they chose to do it. And then, yeah, once they chose to do that. Then you're, yeah.
Starting point is 00:46:26 The cycle was on. Yeah. It was immediately Gavin Newsom was like, okay, we're doing it. And Gavin Newsom's people loved that. Because everybody knows that we have, we don't have, the stigma. around these boundaries has been blown up during the Trump era. And so it's unfortunate, it's reality. Nobody is, unless somebody, if these Indian Republicans
Starting point is 00:46:49 had a real, like, substantive plan to stop redistricting around the country, they would probably have a better case with Republican voters, but nobody, everybody hates gerrymandering, but also everybody hates not doing it now. Like Republicans and Democrats hate not doing it now. It's a horrible status quo, but it is, unfortunately, are a reality. Ryan, Ohio. Interesting results in Ohio last night as well. We can put this up on the
Starting point is 00:47:13 screen. Politico, quote, Ohio, Republicans fear former ICE official could cost them a battleground house seat. Now, this is about Madison Sheehan, who was a very young and inexperienced deputy to Christy Knoem. Her title was, I'm trying to remember exactly what her title was. She was deputy director at ICE, that's right. And then resigned to run for Congress back home in Ohio was the subject of a salacious daily male hit piece about her. That was incredible. Sex life, yes. About her sex life, just a couple weeks ago.
Starting point is 00:47:49 Rather aggressive. Was it sexual assault even? Like, there was some pretty serious, like, yikes. It was definitely a yikes story. I don't remember if there was sexual assault. Anyway, a lot of yikes going on. Ruled into it, but yes, Madison Sheehan, people, may be...
Starting point is 00:48:08 So she might lose, right? Madison Sheehan is the results are in lost and lost big as we can look at the results right now. So this is former state representative Derek Marin won and now goes up against Marcy Kaptur in Ohio's ninth congressional district. Yeah, she lost. She lost. And the Daily Mail story, the headline was that she was engaged in a two-year-seekar relationship with a junior staffer inside of the Ohio Republican Party, and there were just some private communications and stuff that leaked. Obviously, anytime you have same-sex relationships within a Republican administration that is
Starting point is 00:48:49 also equally to, like, the media, a sort of hypocritical, I mean, it's different within the Trump administration, but that was also the subject of fascination, I think, in the media reports, or gave them extra, little extra fuel, because, of course, from a Republican administration. Oh, and before we go to Colorado, one real quick one on Ohio. Yeah, yeah, yeah. This is buried down here. This is Greg Lansman, who held onto a seat.
Starting point is 00:49:20 But he is one of the only Democrats to publicly support the war in Iran and has been one of the most ridiculously outspoken, unapologetic supporters of Israel within the caucus. uh, Damon Lynch the fourth, a progressive who spent like $5, uh, got 32% of the vote against this, against the incumbent landsman. So to have landsman under 70 is, uh, suggests that like he's, his type of politics is vulnerable. Uh, and that actually, I just said another point on Ohio on the Sheean race. This was seen in, I think, some way as a test of whether Trump's ICE immigration policies, would be toxic in a place like Ohio and a Republican primary in Ohio.
Starting point is 00:50:14 Is it like she was literally deputy director of ICE, not some random bureaucrat, but like actually the deputy director behind Christine O'm and all of these photos. Those were in the ads. So another thing, just before we move away from Ohio, I wanted to note that did not work for Madison Cheon. Yes, indeed. So in Colorado, speaking of this redistricting cycle, there, Democrats are trying to get onto the ballot a measure to, you know, redraw these boundaries in November, which would then
Starting point is 00:50:42 apply to 2028, which shows that, like, this is a long-term thing. That would only give them the advantage in 2028 and 2030, because it was coming anyway from the census. But Colorado being one of these Democratic-run states had leaned more towards fair process and doing a, you know, the kind of commission type of approach where you're fair. Democrats plan to throw that out for 28 and 2030. And if voters approve it, according to a new reporting put up E3, the primary donor to the cause of getting this measure onto the ballot is Hakeem Jeffries. It's like Super PAC basically.
Starting point is 00:51:30 And so, yes. So then moving over to Michigan. Real quickly, there was state Senate race. Massive blowout over performance again in a what was a... Plus one. This is a plus one. District. Yeah, what do we have here?
Starting point is 00:51:49 E7. State Senate 35. Harris plus one district. And, yeah, he blew it out by like 20 plus or whatever. Just across the board, I don't think... I think Democrats have now flipped. five seats in special legislative elections? Yeah, let's throw E9 on the screen. This is your guy, Daniel Ryan, who said, this is a remarkable analysis that he did over at Bolt's, his website.
Starting point is 00:52:15 The GOP has not flipped a legislative seat in any state since 2024. Just read that again. Not flipped a legislative seat in any state since 2024. Democrats, meanwhile, have flipped five seats so far in 2026. And that's after flipping 25 in 2025. And I would like to remind everybody that the end of the Obama administration, Republicans took a victory lap. You may remember this, a huge Politico story that came out. A thousand seats or whatever. Yeah, that, that was retrospective. This was towards the end of 2016 on all of the seats Democrats had lost during the Obama administration and how he had essentially not, I mean, maybe it's the Obama brand. Maybe it was a lazy Democratic party under Obama that tried to kind of coast on vibes and not really take a,
Starting point is 00:53:02 of some of these underlying problems in the economy that was giving rise to Trump and Bernie populism, whatever it was, Democrats hemorrhaged seats around the country over the course of the Obama administration. It looks like, not to anybody's particular surprise, but after Republicans took that victory love about 10 years ago, very smugly over Obama, it looks like that is the experience that will probably be part of the Trump era for Republicans. Yeah, they're going to flip a bunch of chambers, I would suspect in November as well. Seems like it. Yeah.
Starting point is 00:53:35 So meanwhile, the D-Triple-C has ticked off an enormous number of Democrats. You can put up E5 here. This is, this was really not the moment for Washington Democrats to creep into congressional elections around the country and put their thumb on the scale and endorse a particular Democratic candidate while there are, while there are serious contests still underway. So they added, I think, eight new people, yeah, eight new Democrats to what they call their red to blue list, which means they're getting the Democratic parties basically their endorsement, getting access to their donors, to their vendors, to their consultants, which, you know, who knows what all of that is worth to them in the end. but also gives them both the sheen
Starting point is 00:54:29 of being party endorsed but also the stench of being party endorsed and so it'll be interesting to see how some of these play out California's 22nd district Jasmite Baines was one of the more controversial red to blue candidates
Starting point is 00:54:45 Jasmid is running against Randy Villegas. Jasmite had been asked if Israel was committing a genocide said yes then said, oh, I think I heard that wrong after starting to get support from pro-Israel super PACs. And so, yes, Israel's committing a genocide, no, it's not. Pro-Israel money flows in, and then Democratic Party money flows in. This is a Latino heavy district. So for them to go and endorse against Randy Vegas, who has the support of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Bold Pack, which is the Hispanic Caucus, is an aggressive use of, you know, Democratic
Starting point is 00:55:24 dues money. Like the way that, you know, D-Triple C is funded partly is through other House Democrats paying dues in. So the Progressive Caucus, which represents 90-plus Democrats endorsed Vegas and is spending its money. And then the D-T-RCC is using their dues money to then support the opponent in the race. That's crazy. So a lot of House Democrats, you know, very upset about this. They did Bob Brooks, who's in the news lately because he accidentally outed
Starting point is 00:55:59 Josh Shapiro as having did you see this? Having endorsed this Republican because he was mad at the Democratic was the AG or something for Comptroller or some one of those positions Bernie backed guy so D-Triple C and Bernie
Starting point is 00:56:14 on the same page which is which is quite fascinating but anyway we'll track these red to blue ones as they get closer to the races and see how well that D-Triple C did at putting its thumb on the scale because the only thing more embarrassing than putting your thumb on the scale is putting a thumb on the scale and still losing. Well, this is, let's put E4 on the screen. This is another dub for Graham Platner. Big dub for Graham Platner. He's a, K-File found an old video of Susan Collins behind George Bush and Graham Platner is yelling in the audience.
Starting point is 00:56:48 2002. Don't attack Iraq yet. 2002. So before the invasion. Let's roll the clip. I want to thank the grassroots activists who are here. I want to thank the people who take time who work hard to make sure that the democracy is strong. I want to thank you very much for your efforts on behalf of all candidates. I want to thank you for what you have done. I want to thank you for what you're going to do, and that is to turn out to vote for these candidates on November the 5th. When I say that I understand Susan Collins,
Starting point is 00:57:45 I do. I've worked closely with her. So there's George W. Bush pumping up Susan Collins back in 2002, and you hear Graham Platner, audibly, his voice in the background saying, don't attack Iraq. So the point Ryan was making about going back and checking how the D-Trip putting its thumb on the scales works out. Just a reminder of establishment Democrats here in Washington's record of that recently. There was no way they wanted Platter to be the candidate in Maine to take on Susan Collins. But here you have unearthed video, I think, showing exactly why they should have been excited about Graham Platner being the guide to take on Susan Collins rather than Janet Mills, one of the most uninspiring candidates conceivable in that race in Maine. And we knew about this protest because it was reported publicly and he was interviewed by someone, you know, after he'd gotten taken out of this event.
Starting point is 00:58:37 And then people, and then one of the first things I asked him when we had him on the air was, okay, you did that, but then you enlisted to go fight. in those wars, like, why? And what he has, what he said then and what he said, he's actually addressed this like in Reddit posts. He basically says he can't explain it, really. But he had wanted to be a soldier for ever since as long as he could remember. But that doesn't mean that he agreed with the policy decisions that were being made. He also made a point in one of his Reddit post that I think people don't quite understand is that in basically in every unit there's like not every unit but a lot of them there's there's the lefty and as somebody from rural America can tell you yeah there's like we exist out in rural America too. There's lefties out there not as many but they're
Starting point is 00:59:30 out there and then there's always like a nationalist right winger in the unit and then everybody else is like it's just a normal person doing going about their life he was the he was the lefty in the unit it happens Why? I can't quite explain it, but it happens. I mean, there's a lot of benefits to enlisting if you're... Well, there's that too. Yeah. All right. Let's go ahead, Ryan, and bring in our next guest,
Starting point is 00:59:56 who's going to tell us exactly how miserable it is to be graduating college right now. Imagine an Olympics where doping is not only legal, but encouraged. It's the enhanced games. Some call it grotesque. Others say it's unleashing human potential. Either way, the podcast, Superhuman, documented it all, embedded in the games and with the athletes for a full year. Within probably 10 days, I'd put on 10 pounds. I was having trouble stopping the muscle growth.
Starting point is 01:00:26 Listen to Superhuman on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. My mother-in-law spent years sabotaging our relationship until karma made her pay for it. Wait a minute, Dakota. How bad did it get? Well, it got bad enough that her son-in-law had to eventually arrest her himself. She moved in for two weeks, lasted for five. She left nail clippings in the bathtub, candy stuck to the furniture, and then she pressed her ear against the bedroom door and burst in screaming.
Starting point is 01:00:53 She did not burst in while they were. She did. They kicked her out and paid for her hotel, and they thought, it's finally over. Days later, she called her son-in-law at work, claiming that his partner had been in some kind of freak accident and had been rushed to the hospital in an ambulance. He called every hospital in the city,
Starting point is 01:01:08 and his partner was making... coffee the entire time. She faked a medical emergency just to test whether or not he loved her son? Yeah. And she sat in the hospital parking lot waiting for him to see if he would show up. When that didn't work, she walked into the son-in-loss police station and filed a kidnapping report against him. She filed a kidnapping report against him in his own police station. And spoilers, karma's going to show up in the best way possible. So if you want to hear how this story ends, search OK story time on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening. to podcasts. You can have opinions. You can have like a strong stance. And then there's your body having its own program. I'm Dr. Maya Shunker, a cognitive scientist and hosts of the podcast, a slight change of plans, a show about who we are and who we become when life makes other plans. We share stories and scientific insights to help us all better navigate these periods of turbulence
Starting point is 01:02:07 and transformation. There is one five. finding that is consistent, and that is that our resilience rests on our relationships. I wish that I hadn't resisted for so long the need to change. We have to be willing to live with a kind of uncertainty that none of us likes. Listen to a slight change of plans on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Graduation season is upon us, which means it's time for students to start hitting the job market. But if you're like me and Emily, you're hearing from people around the country that graduates are entering a workforce that is as brutal and facing headwinds is stronger than any time perhaps since 2008, 2009.
Starting point is 01:03:01 Yet without the, I hesitate to call it optimism, but the optimism at the time that at least that would be a one to two to three, maybe four year hiccup, but that things might recover now. they're they're graduating into a world that is seems like different in kind than the world that they kind of entered college in and by the way they entered it in difficult time because you're you know finishing up with with co you know finishing high school amid COVID and entering college minute and so what we wanted to do today is talk to one of those graduating seniors we're going to be joined by timmy mccalister who is a computer science soon to be graduate at the University of Central Florida. Timmy, he got on our, Timmy, you got on our radar a couple years ago because you did kind of a funny video.
Starting point is 01:03:52 He did some computer science. Some computer science. Video kind of taking the conversation that Sager and I had had on this program about the Barbie movie and turning it into video. A lo-fi. But now you're headed into the, into the, job market, a recent video that you did has gotten, I think, you know, enormous numbers for a small YouTube channel like 100,000. Over 100,000, yes, a viral video. About what it's like trying to get into this job market in this environment. So, Timmy, first of all, thank you so much for being here
Starting point is 01:04:30 and taking time out of your kind of graduation schedule. Appreciate it. Yeah, absolutely. I'm a huge fan of the show, so I really appreciate the opportunity. So when do you graduate, by the way, still finals kicking around? I finished my last final yesterday. So I'm through pretty much all of my school work. My actual graduation is going to be Saturday evening. So just working working on that. Well, bittersweet, congratulations. Maybe at the end of the, we'll play some of the Barbie thing at the end of the same. He loves it so much. He loves it so much. I do. It's great. So let's start with a little bit of the video of yours that kind of went viral that was getting attention about the difficulties of finding work at this moment. Let's roll F1. I'm applying to PhD programs because
Starting point is 01:05:22 I've pretty much given up on the idea of getting a job because even if I did get a job, I'd probably just end up doing like annoying work wrangling with AIs for like one or two years. And then you have AIs that can wrangle themselves and I'm not even useful anymore. So I'm going into a PhD. Hopefully I can do a little bit of research about AIs, even though I don't have access to the best AIs. So what was your job application process like before you made the decision to just pull the plug on it? Yeah. So pretty much all of last summer, I just spent like applying to.
Starting point is 01:06:08 to internship positions. I was looking for some web development positions because I've done a lot of like full stack web development work. I was also looking for like, you know, like AI internships, stuff like that because I've experienced like fine-tuning large language models to do specific tasks. But, you know, I applied to probably definitely over 100 job applications. I did at least like one to three every day. like I forced myself over last summer, mostly on, like, LinkedIn, but, you know, I'm not counting any of
Starting point is 01:06:46 those, like, stupid, like, easy apply things because those don't really do anything. No one ever responds to those. So just counting the ones where, you know, I found the job application on LinkedIn, went to the employer's website, definitely over 100. And I mean, I didn't get, I feel like I'm almost lucky in the sense that I got probably like 30 to 40 rejections. A lot of people don't hear anything back at all from these jobs that they applied to. And then I did get one interview at the unpaid front-end web development position that I've been doing the past couple semesters. And yeah, that's what I've been doing these past couple semesters.
Starting point is 01:07:29 And yeah, I talked to the supervisor there also. And I mean, this was the thing that honestly really, like, shocked me is at that unpaid internship position, he told me that there were 250 other applicants. Wow. And I was I was the one who got the lucky unpaid, unpaid job. So, oh, wow. So, Tim, you started, you went into school studying computer science as an undergrad in 2020. And so I'm really curious if you could tell us just a little bit more. get into this in your video, which folks can go watch. But tell us a little bit more just about
Starting point is 01:08:10 yourself, about how well you did in school, you had pretty good grades, and on why, you know, going in, what your expectations were of how studying computer science would set you up, I'm sure, you believed, for success. You're jumping in right before the AI boom is starting to change absolutely everything. Yeah. So, I mean, yeah, I remember, you know, before I had, you know, decided on UCF. I was pretty sure I was going to go into psychology. But, you know, I was always interested in computer science. I've always been like a code or always worked on websites, stuff like that.
Starting point is 01:08:49 And I thought that, you know, there's a lot of great opportunities there. They told us there were a lot of great opportunities there. The job market was great in 2022. But, yeah, I mean, now I have a 4.0 GPA. I literally literally straight A's like my entire time here at college. I've done, you know, I was a teaching assistant. I've done research in various labs. And, you know, another big thing too that, like they say,
Starting point is 01:09:18 employers like to look for is that, you know, you have sort of a decent number of like personal projects, like not just that you've had good grades, but, you know, that you were able to actually like work with something like a much larger scale project. And, you know, I did that like over my, sophomore in junior year, I worked on like this very large scale full stack web development project where I like fine tuned large language models to perform like this specific task of sort of identifying sort of like spin in like language. And yeah, I mean nothing, nothing back from from anyone.
Starting point is 01:09:57 Yeah. And what about one of the things I saw people be critical of. of your video for you say, well, this guy's not at Stanford. It's University of Central Florida. But, well, two things to that. UCF is actually, when it comes to computer science, you know, a pretty strong school. Secondly, we're not an economy just for Stanford. Like, there are millions of people in this country. They all need work.
Starting point is 01:10:28 And so if we say, well, sure, everything's fine. As long as you go to Stanford, you're going to be fine. However, from what I'm hearing, even the people who went to Stanford are deeply struggling to find the kind of jobs that one year ago even would have been easy for somebody coming out of Stanford. Just anecdotally among the circles that you run in, the computer science circles that you run in, what are you hearing from other seniors? Yeah, so, you know, I don't know anyone at Stanford. Most of the people I know are just here at UCF. You know, I have, you know, one of my close friends, you know, he got his first internship freshman year.
Starting point is 01:11:11 And so, you know, he was able to sort of use those connections at the time and sort of like continue working through various positions. He has a job offer right now. So I'm very happy for him. I know a lot of other people who are going to be. going to grad school. It really just kind of seems like a safe option, especially if you've done well in school. You can work towards like a specific project, like research, something like that, continue getting paid. Like if you have an assistantship with a tuition waiver.
Starting point is 01:11:49 And it's like that's, that's an option I've actually seen a very large number of people doing. But yeah, there's, I'd say it's mostly that. And then, yeah, I do, I do have a couple people who sort of got those connections early. And like, you know, they always tell us like networking is really, really important for like getting a job. But nowadays it feels like that really is kind of the only way anyone gets any job. Because if you're trying to wade into that pool of college or not college applications, job applications, where it really is just thousands and thousands of AI generated resumes that are going to these AI filters that, who knows what they're even doing,
Starting point is 01:12:37 how many of these jobs are even real, you're not going to be in for a fun time. Can you talk to us about the response you've gotten to your video again? We mentioned it's over 100,000 views, and that's, I think, interesting in and of itself. I think it probably speaks to you capturing something that other people are then sending around, and saying this is what my experience is, like it's resonant. So talk to us a bit about what you've heard from other people as you've shared your own experience publicly. Yeah, I mean, I don't know.
Starting point is 01:13:08 There's sort of a couple different sets of responses. I mean, there's a lot of people who are, you know, even like earlier along the path than me who are either like just graduating high school right now or they're like a freshman or a sophomore. more. And, you know, they're just trying to, like, figure out what should they even be doing right now in this economy? And, you know, I try to give advice as best I can, but, you know, I honestly don't really know, like, what the best option would be for someone going through that. I mean, honestly, the best piece of advice I could give to someone like that is just to keep
Starting point is 01:13:46 working on, like, personal projects. You can, you can use Claude code to, like, spin up an interesting idea pretty quickly. And maybe you can put that on a resume or get some sort of connection or something from that. And then there's sort of like this other set of people. I don't know. I got this email from someone who's like just like move to the Bay Area, bro. There's a bunch of like AI, AI engineer positions. XAI is paying like $400,000 a year if you're willing to sell out your soul.
Starting point is 01:14:20 but not everyone can live in San Francisco so I don't really know about that Yeah that might not be the best advice I mean that is You know when you combine it with The idea that networking is the only way to get a job at this point Like I get the idea like just move to the Bay Area Like when you wanted to be an actor you moved used to be
Starting point is 01:14:43 You moved to L.A. You want to be country musician in this Or you want to be a folk musician in the 60s You move to you know the village you want to be a country singer you move to Nashville like so I get it um but as you think about that what like is that possible like are there affordable group houses for people moving out there or like because if it's $5,000 for an apartment you better network immediately um and you're also not going to get the apartment um yeah that is sort of the issue it's like i don't know anyone in California, like I can't just get a job. Like, I need to have a job lined up there already,
Starting point is 01:15:25 and then, you know, the ability then to move, knowing that I have, like, some sort of stable income. Like, I could never just move to San Francisco. Like, that's not financially feasible. That's bleak. Unless you're living in the street. Right. And to me, you go through this in the video, but tell us a little bit more about why you've landed on the path that you've landed for your future. like, why are you taking the bet that you are? What is it? I mean, it actually, it's a story that reminds me a lot of what people were making the decision to do during the Great Recession. Kind of to stay in school.
Starting point is 01:16:00 So talk to us a little bit about why you're thinking what you're thinking right now, why you're taking that kind of gamble. It's a sort of safer bet. Why do you think it's a safer bet? Yeah, I mean, there's sort of like two reasons. I mean, the first one is kind of just purely financial. like I'm very lucky that I don't have any debt. Like I had a very good scholarship. So I'm debt-free and I don't have to really worry about immediately making income to try to pay that off.
Starting point is 01:16:29 So I have a little bit more time. I managed to land a graduate assistantship position. So, you know, they'll pay me for doing research and I get tuition waves. So, you know, it's not like I'm going into more dire. financial straits by doing this. And then the other reason is I really am just sort of interested and worried about sort of the consequences of AI on society. I've always been worried about this. I think social media is an example of a sort of very, very simple AI system that just runs from like the one rule of maximizing engagement. And I think it has had.
Starting point is 01:17:16 catastrophic consequences like on the mental health of my generation. And I can't imagine like what the consequences could be for something way, way smarter if we don't like take this really, really seriously and get this right. So, you know, I'm hoping to be able to do some sort of research with AI safety alignment, figuring out how we can actually make these things do what we need to. But I understand that it's, it's not going to be easy. but hopefully I can make at least some sort of contribution there. Well, hopefully. Because nobody else has taken it very seriously.
Starting point is 01:17:49 That's for sure. Yeah. All right. Let's finish up with some Barbie. We can roll Timmy's production from a couple years ago. Put up at 3. One reason I'm okay with her getting snub, though, is because she really flopped the landing with this, like, reification of neoliberalism at the very end with this, you are, you are
Starting point is 01:18:10 enough. Oh, yeah. Nobody's enough. You need community. You need socialization. You need friends. You need family. Like, you need loved ones around you.
Starting point is 01:18:18 Nobody is enough. And the idea that you would try to tell a whole bunch of kids that they don't need anything other than themselves, I thought was just a, like, horrific message at the end. So. And the idea that you would try to tell a whole bunch of kids that they don't need anything other than themselves, nobody's enough. Nobody's enough. You need community. You need socialization. You need friends.
Starting point is 01:18:40 You need family. like you need loved ones around you nobody is enough no nobody is enough you need community you need socialization you need friends you need family you need loved ones around you nobody is enough it's pretty good stuff to me that's pretty funny thank you thank you it's uh uh worked pretty hard on it timi you're enough yeah and must must be probably a lot easier now with claude that was that was this was like pre-clawed coding right yeah yeah that is uh that is uh that is uh that is uh that is a That's an artisanal. Yeah.
Starting point is 01:19:15 Yeah. Timmy McAllister, where can people follow you? Where can they find your work, whether it's lo-fi or graduation videos? Yeah, so I'm on YouTube, Timmy McAllister. I've been trying to upload about a video every week talking about AI, society, stuff like that. If anyone wants to try to support me financially, I just started a page. Patreon. I don't have anything really on there yet. I have like a couple of videos, but if anyone is able to, that would be awesome. But yeah, that's about what I'm doing right now. That's about all we got left to offer as an economy. So, well, we'll stay in touch. Curious how your journey goes over the next, you know, months and years. So thanks for, thanks for being here. Good luck. Yeah, absolutely. Thank you so much for having me. All right. Enjoy graduation day.
Starting point is 01:20:12 Well, Emily, I am sure glad I'm not graduating right now. What a... God, I'm sorry for all these people that are graduating into this disaster. No, it's brutal. I pulled up a New York Times article while we were talking to Timmy, and the New York Times is describing this as, quote, the most dismal and unpredictable job market in years. Employers overall are hiring fewer workers, dimming the prospects in particular for first-time entrance into the labor market, and then also obviously mentioning the rise of AI,
Starting point is 01:20:42 which we just heard from Timmy, who thought computer science would be a safe major going into school in 2022. How quickly they're going to change. And yeah, and the harder that first, the higher that first obstacle is, then the more it helps to be rich to be in with. And the further we get from a remotely meritocratic level playing field. Yes, that's a good point. Because like if your parents can send you to the Bay Area for six months, pay your rent. unpaid internships, that type of thing.
Starting point is 01:21:14 Which apparently are possible to get, too. Bleak, truly, truly, bleak. I mean, that was the theme of today's show. With the exception of maybe Iran, we may have an end of kinetic fighting. There may be an end in sight. I don't know. We'll see, but bleak all around indeed.
Starting point is 01:21:35 So thanks for watching. Frankie Points.com get a premium subscription if you like being tortured by bad news like we do. Yeah, indeed. Talk to you later. Another podcast from some SNL late-night comedy guy, not quite. Unhumor me with Robert Smygel and friends.
Starting point is 01:22:07 Me and hilarious guests from Bob Odenkirk to David Letterman help make you funnier. This week, my guest, SNL's Mikey Day and head writer Streeter Seidel help an a cappella band with their between songs banter. Where does your group perform? We do some retirement homes. Those people are starving for banter.
Starting point is 01:22:24 Listen to humor me with Robert Smigel and friends on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Imagine an Olympics where doping is not only legal but encouraged. It's the enhanced games. Some call it grotesque. Others say it's unleashing human potential. Either way, the podcast's superhuman documented it all,
Starting point is 01:22:45 embedded in the games and with the athletes for a full year. Within probably 10 days, I'd put on 10 pounds. I was having trouble stopping the muscle growth. Listen to Superhuman on the IHard Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Hey, what's good, y'all? You're listening to Learn the Hard Way with your favorite therapist and host, Kear Games.
Starting point is 01:23:06 This space is about black men's experiences, having honest conversations that it's really not safe to have anywhere, but you're having them with a licensed professional who knows what he's doing. How many men carry a suit or armor? It signals to the world that you not to be played with. And just because you have the capability that does not mean that you need to. Listen and learn the hard way on the IHard radio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
Starting point is 01:23:32 This is an IHart podcast. Guaranteed human.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.