Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar - 6/10/24: Bibi War Cabinet Collapse As Gantz Resigns, Israeli Hostage Rescue Kills Hundreds In Gaza
Episode Date: June 10, 2024Krystal and Saagar discuss Bibi war cabinet collapses as Gantz resigns, Israeli hostage rescue kills hundreds in Gaza. To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FRE...E, uncut and 1 hour early visit: https://breakingpoints.com/ Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is an iHeart Podcast. the recording studios. Stories matter and it brings a face to them. It makes it real. It really does.
It makes it real.
Listen to new episodes of the War on Drugs podcast season two
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Over the years of making my true crime podcast,
Hell and Gone,
I've learned no town is too small for murder.
I'm Katherine Townsend.
I've heard from hundreds of people across the country
with an unsolved murder in their community. I was calling about the murder of my husband.
The murderer is still out there. Each week, I investigate a new case. If there is a case we
should hear about, call 678-744-6145. Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line on the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Stay informed, empowered, and ahead of the curve with the BIN News This Hour podcast,
updated hourly to bring you the latest stories shaping the Black community. From breaking
headlines to cultural milestones, the Black Information Network delivers the facts, the
voices, and the perspectives that matter 24-7 because our stories deserve to be
heard. Listen to the BIN News This Hour podcast on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever
you get your podcasts. Hey guys, Ready or Not 2024 is here and we here at Breaking Points are
already thinking of ways we can up our game for this critical election. We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade the studio, add staff, give you guys the
best independent coverage that is possible. If you like what we're all about, it just means the
absolute world to have your support. But enough with that. Let's get to the show.
Good morning, everybody. Happy Monday. We have an amazing show for everybody today. What do we
have, Crystal? Indeed we do. We got a lot have an amazing show for everybody today. What do we have, Crystal?
Indeed we do. We got a lot of breaking news with regards to Israel.
So first of all, Benny Gantz is out of the government of that war cabinet.
He announced that he is pressuring for a ceasefire deal.
We've got Tony Blinken, who is there in the region as well.
So a lot to get to there and what that could mean. We have four Israeli hostages rescued and roughly 1,000 Palestinians killed or injured in that operation by the IDF and some questions about American
involvement. So a lot to get to there that's very consequential. We have new polls out with
some interesting insights into whether or not Trump's convictions are going to matter and then
whether or not people really care about them. The answer appears to basically be not so much. Very interesting things coming out of Europe as
well. They had the EU parliamentary elections and in particular in France and Germany, huge surge
for the far right. Macron has announced snap elections. So that is kind of fascinating.
Sometimes that can be a canary in the coal mine for our own politics. So we want to take a look at that. And we also have Breonna Joy Gray fired by the Hill.
Needless to say, Sagar and I both have some thoughts and potential insights there to share with you.
The Hill? What's that? Never heard of it.
Former Hill refugees ourselves.
We've got some thoughts about what's going on there.
All right. That's right.
Okay, before we get to that, we actually have a major story coming later today.
We weren't able to fit it in the show for timing reasons from Ryan Grimm.
We're going to be interviewing him, and he's going to be breaking some major Supreme Court-related news.
So everybody stay tuned on all of our channels.
We will be posting that, and we'll email it out to premium subscribers as well.
But we are expecting this to actually make some news and possibly picked up by the mainstream press.
So it's going to be a fun day here at Breaking Points.
If you want to support our work, Breaking breakingpoints.com. We really appreciate it.
But with that, let's get to the Benny Gantz news. All right. So Benny Gantz announced a
press conference and he made it official that he was leaving the war cabinet. We've got a little
bit of the coverage from Sky News, which has the advantage of being in English. So let's take a
listen to a little bit of what he had to say. We can tell you that he is unhappy with the apparent lack of a plan for after the war with Gaza.
He has been threatening to resign.
He was going to release a statement yesterday, but the news that those four Israeli hostages had been rescued from Gaza meant his statement was delayed until today. But in the last few moments, he has
resigned from the Israeli war cabinet. He says in Netanyahu's government, political considerations
are impeding strategic decisions in the Gaza war. He also says that Benjamin Netanyahu is preventing real victory. We are leaving emergency
government, he says. He also calls on Benjamin Netanyahu to set an agreed election date. And
he's been calling on the defence minister, Yoav Galant, to be brave and do what is right and presumably follow his lead by resigning from the
war cabinet. There was also a major military official who just announced his resignation as
well, who was in charge of the Gaza area and said, I basically failed on October 7th to keep Israelis
safe. Benny Gantz, as part of that press conference, he also apologized to the hostage
families and asked for their forgiveness, saying, quote, we failed. The responsibility is also mine.
So you guys will recall the war cabinet is made up of Netanyahu, was Benny Gantz, and Yoav Galant.
Now, moderate in the Israeli context, always keep in mind, none of these people are against the war.
None of them are, quote unquote, moderate. However, there are some differences in terms of how they wanted to
approach things. Gantz in particular is more favorable towards the ceasefire deal that has
been floated by Joe Biden. Yoav Galant seems to be more in that direction as well. Both of them
have been pushing for a plan for the, quote unquote, day after. And so that's why Sagar
is really noteworthy
and also not surprising that he points to Netanyahu and says basically, you're putting politics first.
You don't actually care about the war. You don't care about the hostages. You don't care about
Israel. You care about your own political survival. And Gantz had previously issued an ultimatum
basically saying, listen, you need to call for elections. We need some sort of concrete workable plan for the quote unquote day after in Gaza. Otherwise, I'm leaving the
war cabinet. And that, in fact, is what he has done now. Yeah, it's really interesting. Really,
what it comes down to is the both domestic political situation, but also Gantz is not an
idiot. He basically has the tacit backing of the United States, the Biden government,
the European Union. He's not facing
any international problems. If Netanyahu goes away, A, he's likely going to face a criminal
trial for his own corruption allocations that predate long October 7th. But second, you know,
he's actually got to grapple with his political legacy. Just to explain to people, because it's
a little bit confusing, this does not actually bring down the Netanyahu government. His old
coalition, pre-October 7th coalition, still stands.
He has a 64-seat majority in the Israeli parliament.
The question then comes to the shakiness of that, the calling for the election.
And really, the way I guess people could think about it for historical context is when Clement Attlee left the government of the wartime coalition after Britain won the Second World War.
And they called for an election.
Actually, Churchill ended up being defeated. So possibly there could be some parallels there.
The point, though, is just that the shakiness brings effectively domestic politics,
as in like capital P politics, back to the country of Israel, which has been
totally united on a domestic front. Interestingly enough, this is the only question, is the timing
of the so-called hostage mission, because, and we're going to get to this. But it really affected Benny Gantz. He originally had
the speech on the books for withdrawing the day of the hostage release. He ended up having to
cancel his speech. But that is probably the single most popular thing that Netanyahu has done since
what? Since October 7th. Prior to that, the best thing that he possibly could have done for his
political future. So this actually does raise the question of maybe he could survive. It's
certainly possible. It's going to be a big question of both international politics,
how these really people themselves feel about it. And also, don't forget this,
but Gantz could still lose. It's very, very possible. It could be that some Likud successor
to Netanyahu or somebody who's like him actually does end up prevailing in an election.
None of the baggage, same hardline policy, very, very possible for the future.
So right after October 7th, both Benny Gantz and Yair Lapid, who is like the opposition leader,
were approached about joining this, you know, temporary war cabinet government.
And Gantz demanded that the far right, most farright psychos, Motrich and Ben-Gavir, were—they didn't have to be pushed out of government entirely, but they couldn't be part of the war cabinet.
And Lapid had a more hardline position of, these guys can't be involved in all, and that's my condition.
And Netanyahu said no.
And so Yair Lapid remained outside of the war cabinet government.
I read a Haaretz analysis that basically,
you know, really said Benny Gantz has sort of propped up Netanyahu here, has really given him
a legitimacy that he didn't deserve and gave him a sort of grace with the public that allowed him
to persist in this role for this long. Now, the counterside of that would be, well, Gantz pressured
for, you know for the original ceasefire
deal that led to a very brief pause in hostilities and the release of a certain number of hostages.
And perhaps if Gantz hadn't been in the war cabinet, maybe that wouldn't have happened,
perhaps. But there were other pressures on Netanyahu at that point as well.
So that's some of the Israeli domestic debate. To the extent that there is a moderate coalition in Israel,
they basically feel that Benny Gantz stayed far too long and perhaps shouldn't have ever taken
part in this to begin with. So as I mentioned before, and Zagre, you alluded to, we can put
this up on the screen, Tony Blinken, Secretary of State, will arrive in Israel today and meet with Gantz and Netanyahu. The U.S. is also pushing this supposedly Israeli
ceasefire deal that, of course, now Israel is not willing to actually back some resolution
through the U.N. Security Council. So the U.S. is sort of, you know, working on pushing that
through the U.N. Security Council. There's a lot of questions over it. It appears that the hostage
deal isn't really moving anywhere anyway. So I'm seeing all these headlines that are
like, Benny Gantz leaving the government complicates the hostage ceasefire negotiations.
And I don't really know that that's the case because it doesn't appear that they're actually
moving anyway. So if anything, maybe it shakes it up. Maybe it shakes something loose. I don't know.
We can put this up on the screen also about the domestic political reaction from significant Israeli political figures. Netanyahu molds dissolving the war
cabinet. Ben-Gavir is demanding a seat at the table. We've got Bibi putting out this strange
tweet, in my opinion. Cryptic doesn't actually mention Benny Gantz, but that's clearly who this
is about. He says, Israel's in an existential war on several fronts.
My son, this is not the time to abandon the campaign.
This is the time to join forces.
Citizens of Israel, we will continue until victory and the achievement of all the goals of the war,
primarily the release of all our hostages and the elimination of Hamas.
My door will remain open to any Zionist party that is ready to get under the stretcher.
And this is, by the way, the Google Translate.
So I don't know. The reason it seems weird might be because of the Google Translation.
But anyway, ready to get under the stretcher and assist in bringing victory over our enemies and
ensuring the safety of our citizens. We've got opposition leader Yair Lapid saying,
Gantz's and Eisenkot's decision to leave the failed government is important and correct.
The time has come to replace this extreme and reckless government with a sane government that will lead to the return of security to the
citizens of Israel, to the return of the hostages, to the restoration of Israel's economy and
international status. So this is the primary opposition leader to Netanyahu. Of course,
he's very interested in elections sooner rather than later. And then you have National Security
Minister Itamar Ben-Gavir. Put this next one up on the screen. He says, as a minister in the government, chairman of a party,
and a senior partner in the coalition, I hereby demand to join this cabinet in order to be a
partner in determining Israel's security policy in the current times. It's time to make brave
decisions. So one of the most psychotic members of the Netanyahu coalition now asking to be included in the war cabinet.
At the same time, we can put this up on the screen in terms of, I alluded to this before, where we are with the ceasefire negotiations.
Washington Post headlines, despite Biden's urging, ceasefire deal shows no progress.
As I alluded to before, they're pushing this U.N. Security Council resolution.
Whether that gets through, whether that makes a difference. I don't know. Seems kind of unlikely. But they're
reporting here, they say, more than a week after President Biden declared a decisive moment in the
eight-month Israel-Gaza war and beseeched both sides to quickly approve a U.S.-backed ceasefire
deal, there is dwindling evidence that either has bought what he is selling. Despite Biden's
personal and very public urging,
his dispatch of senior administration officials to the region, the drafting of a new UN Security
Council resolution, and the marshalling of allies to join in a chorus of approval,
neither Israel nor Hamas appear to have budged on their wide divergence over the proposed roadmap
to permanently end the war in Gaza. Israel's successful rescue of four hostages
early Saturday while welcomed may further complicate administration efforts bolstering
Prime Minister Netanyahu's insistence on a full military victory and release of all remaining
Hamas-held hostages before Israel's guns are silenced. So the big divide in terms of a ceasefire
is basically Hamas wants the war to end and Israel, Bibi Netanyahu, does not want the war to end.
So that has been a fairly unbridgeable divide for some time now.
Biden tried to put pressure on through this big speech that he gave and, you know, rhetoric effectively.
But Sagar, once again, appears that he is set up for a massive humiliation here
because he's unwilling to actually use the tools and leverage that the U. the US government has outside of his own rhetoric, which clearly has been insufficient.
It reminds me a lot of the Obama administration's handling of Syria. It was very similar. It was
very haphazard. It was all over the place. They would try and expect ceasefires. They'd try and
expect grand bargains. At the same time, we had our own radical, what were they called? Moderate
rebel policy. It was just like a failure. Oh, but also Assad can't use chemical weapons,
but also if he does, maybe, but also maybe he didn't. It's just like a failure. Oh, but also Assad can't use chemical weapons, but also if he does, maybe, but also maybe he didn't. It's just like a just complete incompetence. And that really
is a lot of the same characters are involved, literally, Brett McGurk and others who are the
ones jet setting. Anthony Blinken was in the State Department at that time, and they seem to just be
recreating that policy. They're banking everything on this ceasefire agreement, which neither side particularly seems like they want to do. And they also are banking everything on this
very bizarre Saudi normalization deal. Arguably, that Saudi deal is going to be the most important
thing that could come out of this because they're effectively going to give the Saudis an extension
of non-NATO major ally status and security guarantee the entire country, which is insane, just so everybody
understands. And change of our policy to the region almost dramatically escalates U.S. involvement
and basically ties us to two countries in the Middle East, as opposed to just kind of trying
at least to be above the fray. Traditionally is what we always tried to do. We always usually
wanted a balance of power approach. Here, we would explicitly align ourselves in legal fashion with a single nation, and that almost guarantees some
sort of confrontation with Iran coming down the title. Of course, that's what a lot of people in
this town want, so don't put that past them. But there's a lot of very consequential stuff that's
happening here. I do think if Netanyahu is replaced, even with somebody like Gantz, look,
you may not like the policy whenever it comes to Gaza,
but internationally, I do think there would be a major change.
And I think some sort of like ceasefire or hostage deal seems a lot more likely.
Those guys, Netanyahu is basically dead.
You know, his future is very uncertain.
For them, it's not the same.
You know, they don't have all the baggage of the past.
They want to try and, they can see, they're not stupid for what the future looks like for the nation. They want to dig themselves out of that hole. So in a way, I think
that Gantz, Lapid-led government, anything like that would be a dramatic improvement, you know,
for Israeli policy going forward. The difference is, again, neither is opposed to the war,
neither has any issue with the, you know, massacres that have been committed and the,
you know, fact that Gaza has been effectively annihilated, reduced to rubble, the massive
number of deaths and civilians who've been killed. None of them have any issue with that.
Netanyahu, though, faces pressure from the far right. I mean, the literal terrorists
who are in his government. And so he is constantly trying to split the difference between, you know, maintaining some acceptability to the, you know, what is the Israeli mainstream and these, you know, really hard line, I think very fair to say, fascist individuals that are in his government.
And so that's where he is pressured, which is why, you know, you'll hear him say things that can be
directly contradictory depending on the time. Benny Gantz and Yair Lapid are more likely to
be influenced by the public that's on the side of, we just got to get the hostages.
Yeah, and more like the traditional secular coalition of Israel.
Right, exactly. And so there is,
we've covered the polls here. Again, the Israeli public, Israeli Jews have no issue with the
horrors that have been inflicted by the IDF. You have a number who say, hey, they haven't gone far
enough. You only have 4% who say they've gone too far. So that's not where the pressure lies.
However, we have also seen polling that says there is a clear majority in favor of prioritizing the release of the hostages over this fantasy of complete elimination of Hamas.
And so if you had a Lapid or a Gantz who had more power, they would be pressured more by that public sentiment and public opinion could lead to a different outcome.
But, I mean, Netanyahu shows no signs of calling new elections.
There's no imminent sign that his government is going to collapse and force his hand there.
So he's a wily guy. And, you know, with his political life on the line and also, by the way,
facing corruption charges that could literally land him in prison. At this point, he seems to
be hanging in there and he's thinking, hey, you know, as friendly as Biden's been towards me,
I can, I can, if I can hang in there through the November elections, Trump will be an even greater
buddy to me and go along with whatever I want to do. So I think that's a calculation for him at
this point. I wouldn't bet against him. I think I was saying I'd probably give him a 50% chance
of survival, but that's a lot less than it has been in the future. Yeah. See, I don't know. I
mean, things are definitely shaking up there, and it will go in two directions.
He's either going to lose,
and the center-left slash center-right will take power,
or he will remain in power by making common cause
with much more of the far-Israeli right.
Either, I mean, both, and that's the thing.
Let's not diminish it.
It will have still major consequences for foreign policy.
If that latter case I just described takes it,
ceasefires, not only off the table, it just won't care anymore. They won't even pretend,
you know, to look at it. In terms of West Bank too, there could be a lot of different changes
while against government is going to handle that very, very differently going forward and is going
to be a lot more receptive to U.S. pressure and like, I guess, public management of Israeli
perception in the future with the European Union, with the U.S. So they have a choice and we'll see which way it goes. Yeah, Bibi hasn't really tried to even like
put a reasonable face on the horrors they're inflicting, whereas Gantz may go to greater
lengths to sort of, you know, provide some sort of cover for what they're doing. He could end the war.
It's very possible. I mean, you know, in a lot of ways you could look at it like this. They're like,
look, the Rafah thing, it's not going to happen. Our partners are broadly, like, not really with us.
We could just sign this ceasefire deal.
We call it.
We just move on.
And then there'll be some whatever, some humanitarian, the blaming, aid trucks, et cetera.
I wouldn't put it outside the realm of possibility.
Yeah, but none of that's coming anytime soon.
No, I don't think it will.
Yeah, that's the bottom line.
This five months, we are not just celebrating.
We're fighting back.
I'm George M. Johnson, and my book, All Boys Aren't Blue, was just named the most banned book in America.
If the culture wars have taught me anything, it's that pride is protest. test. And on my podcast, Fighting Words, we talk to people who use
their voices to resist, disrupt,
and make our community
stronger. This year,
we are showing up and showing out. You need
people being like, no, you're not
going to tell us what to do.
This regime is coming down
on us, and I don't want to just survive.
I want to thrive.
You'll hear from trailblazers
like Bob the Drag Queen. To freedom!
Angelica Ross. We ready to fight? I'm ready to fight.
And Gabrielle Yoon. Hi, George.
And storytellers with wisdom
to spare. Listen on the iHeartRadio
app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you
get your podcasts.
I'm Clayton English. I'm Greg Lott.
And this is season two of the War on Drugs podcast.
Yes, sir.
We are back.
In a big way.
In a very big way.
Real people, real perspectives.
This is kind of star-studded a little bit, man.
We got Ricky Williams, NFL player, Heisman Trophy winner.
It's just a compassionate choice to allow players all reasonable means to care for themselves.
Music stars Marcus King, John Osborne from Brothers Osborne.
We have this misunderstanding
of what this quote-unquote drug thing is.
Benny the Butcher.
Brent Smith from Shinedown.
We got B-Real from Cypress Hill.
NHL enforcer Riley Cote.
Marine Corps vet, MMA fighter Liz Karamush.
What we're doing now isn't working
and we need to change things
stories matter and it
brings a face to it
makes it real it
really does it makes
it real listen to new
episodes of the war on
drugs podcast season
two on the iHeart
radio app Apple
podcast or wherever
you get your podcast
and to hear episodes
one week early and
ad free with exclusive
content subscribe to
lava for good Plus on Apple Podcasts.
Over the past six years of making my true crime podcast hell and gone,
I've learned one thing. No town is too small for murder. I'm Katherine Townsend. I've received
hundreds of messages from people across the
country begging for help with unsolved murders. I was calling about the murder of my husband
at the cold case. They've never found her and it haunts me to this day. The murderer is still out
there. Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've
learned as a journalist and private investigator to ask the questions no one else is asking.
Police really didn't care to even try.
She was still somebody's mother.
She was still somebody's daughter.
She was still somebody's sister.
There's so many questions that we've never gotten any kind of answers for.
If you have a case you'd like me to look into,
call the Hell and Gone Murder Line at 678-744-6145.
Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Okay, let's move on to this hostage rescue slash massacre that occurred over the weekend.
We can put this up on the screen.
One woman, this is Noah Arghamani, who was captured at that Nova Music Festival.
And she really became quite famous because there was some horrifying video of her being captured and taken away.
She's crying out for her boyfriend.
This is one of the other male hostages who was released.
But as part of this quote-unquote rescue mission, you had just an absolute massacre.
One of the deadliest days that we have had in this entire Gaza war.
You can see here the rubble.
You can see dead bodies.
You can see the injured.
And reports are from the health ministry that 274 Palestinians were killed in this effort to rescue the four
hostages. We can put this up on the screen from the Financial Times. They have some more details
about what occurred. Their headline here, Israel's raid to free hostages takes horrific toll
on central Gaza. Hundreds of Palestinians killed and injured in gun battles and bombardment that
accompanied the operation. I'll read you a
little bit of this again so you can get some of the details. The raid which freed those four
hostages was a boost, they write, for Netanyahu's government, which has spent the last week
arguing whether to agree to a U.S.-backed plan to end the fighting. But the devastating firepower
used by Israeli forces also made June 8th the deadliest day for Gazans in months, with the
enclave's health ministry
saying the raid, which was accompanied by gun battles and a fierce bombardment, had killed 274
Palestinians and injured 698. One medical chief described the horrific scenes in his hospital
after the raid. The director of the Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital said they came with horrific
injuries, torn lower limbs or upper limbs,
some with broken skulls, their brains pouring out, some shot in the abdomen, in the intestines.
There are women, children, the elderly. Houses have been destroyed and families wiped out.
I also wanted to note from that article, you had the chief Israeli military spokesman,
Daniel Hagari, because this is giving credence to those
on the Netanyahu side of the equation who say,
hey, we don't need a ceasefire,
even though that's the way that obviously
the largest number of hostages were released by far.
And overall, Israel has still killed far more hostages
through their military operations than they have rescued.
But it's giving credence to this idea of,
oh, no, we don't need a
ceasefire deal. We can just, you know, we can just do this again and just, you know, massacre
hundreds of Palestinians to rescue the rest of the hostages. But Daniel Higari, even the Israeli
military spokesman, rejects that view, saying, we know that we cannot do operations to rescue all
of them because the conditions won't allow it. We saw already that what brought the biggest number of hostages home was a deal.
There is no argument about that.
And so, Sagar, I mean, you know, it's one more instance where it's just very clear in terms of the U.S. political elite,
certainly the Israeli political elite, but with our own political elite,
that Palestinian lives just don't count the same way that Israeli lives do, you know,
to celebrate this mission. And I think the hostages should be released. You know, I'm happy
for these hostages that they are home with their families. But at the cost of hundreds of Palestinians,
this is celebrated as a victory. And, you know, a thousand dead and injured more that are trapped
under the rubble. And this is considered a victory. I mean, it just shows you how grotesque
the immorality around this has become. I look, I think it's a tragedy, but this is a complicated
one because this is one where they actually did achieve militarily what they had sought to. Now,
listen, I will say this. The U.S US military does not conduct operations this way. They would never have pulled the trigger.
The circumstances are a little bit difficult because what happened is that the vast majority
of the deaths occurred after they had stormed the apartment building. And then apparently,
the vehicle that the Israelis were in broke down. They were getting fired on by RPGs. So,
they called in air support, basically clear out the road,
take the hostages out, take them to the helicopter. I agree. I mean, it's an absolute tragedy the number of civilians killed here. It also was intentionally placed. I just think militarily,
this is a very different operation than let's saying carpet bombing the crap out of a refugee
camp and saying, well, we hit a single terrorist. It genuinely was in support of a rescue hostage
mission. You could see a Western operation like the US, something like this, go down in a similar
situation where our guys get bogged down, the hostages are there, the vehicle that they're in,
you have to call in air support. At that point, it is a matter of life and death. I just think
this one is a little bit different. I don't think so. No, it is. It's very different.
They bombed a crowded marketplace in the middle of the day. Yeah, I mean, their troops were at risk. Nearly 300
Palestinians murdered to rescue four people. You're right. I mean, on the one hand, our military
would not have greenlit this operation. On the other hand, we were actually involved in some
capacity. According to the New York Times, there was an American role. A team of U.S. hostage
recovery officials stationed in Israel assisted in the Israeli military's effort by providing intelligence and other support.
But going back to your comment, I mean, if you had, imagine Omar Badar, I'm taking this from him, he made this comment yesterday, I think it's so important.
If you had Hamas massacre close to 300 Israelis to rescue four of their prisoners. By the way, Israel holds
thousands of Palestinian hostages. No one would accept that. No one would accept that.
Them going in and massacring kids, women, civilians in a busy, crowded marketplace,
taking out entire multi-story apartment buildings to get four people, no one
would look at that math and say that that's acceptable. So why is it acceptable when it's
Israeli? I would flip it around and say, I think you're making a media point. I don't even disagree
with you. I mean, obviously people in the media cut like a lot more slack, but I mean, each,
any nation group, et cetera, has the ultimate responsibility to look out for its own troops
and for its own people. This, in this particular case, their people are at risk. They also have a responsibility
to follow the laws of war. Listen, Hamas held these hostages in residential areas. That is a
war crime. That does not alleviate the responsibility of Israel or any other nation
to take precautions when it comes to civilians.
The fact that Hamas does something wrong doesn't give you a get out of jail free pass.
And that's the way that they've acted. That's the entire justification for this entire genocide.
They did bad things. They committed war crimes on October 7th. True. So that gives us a green
light to do whatever the hell we want to do and not care one bit about Palestinian civilians.
I mean, this was the deadliest day we've seen in Gaza in months.
It's wholly unjustifiable, especially given the context that there is a deal on the table to rescue all of the hostages without killing a single Palestinian civilian. So if Bibi Netanyahu and
the rest of the military establishment and these far-right goons actually care about the hostages,
then they would agree to the ceasefire deal that they supposedly put forward themselves.
So it's, no, it's not, it's not justifiable. And they also let's put this next piece up on the screen.
They also, as part of this, disguise combatants in civilian clothing.
This is a picture. By the way, this isn't fully verified, but this is the image that was floating around of this civilian vehicle aid truck.
This is a helicopter that landed right by the, quote unquote, humanitarian pier.
The U.S. is saying, oh, no, we had nothing to do with with it. You know, we didn't use the pier, et cetera, et cetera. But that helicopter is literally right
next to the pier. So you make of that what you will. But put this next piece up on the screen.
This is from Ken Roth. Disguising combatants in civilian clothing to commit hostilities
constitutes perfidy. That is a war crime. And this is not from, you know, Palestinian sources,
which nobody seems to believe.
This is from Israeli news sources. Israel's rescue team reportedly entered the area in a furniture
truck driven by a female soldier in civilian clothes. There's a good reason why this is a war
crime, which is if you're using civilian trucks, if you're using especially humanitarian aid trucks, think of how much danger aid workers have already been in in this conflict. So now you're basically putting an even
greater target on their back because there's a suspicion now, if you see an aid truck, that it
could be IDF soldiers coming in to commit another massacre. So that's why that's considered a war
crime. But this is where I just disagree. It's like, well, then all, you know,
U.S. special operations are, quote unquote, a war crime. It's ridiculous. I mean,
our people have gone in- What are you talking about?
What? Well, you think we haven't sent CIA agents and Delta Force operatives disguised in
civilian garb to go smash and grab or, like, rescue our own hostages or rescue Westerners?
Of course we have. We've done it many times. In an aid truck is another level of-
Okay, sure. Aid truck, yeah, I agree. I wouldn't do it. Obviously, these Israelis are going to be
doing a different thing. But this is what I'm saying about the whole discourse around, quote,
unquote, war crime, et cetera. A lot of it is just a farce. It's not the way that people actually
operate in a military environment. I think this one is- Well, it's clearly not the way they operate
in a military environment. But the reason that we have it is so we have language to talk about why
it is wrong and why it should be out of bounds
and so that there is some way to put pressure and not just oh well my red i mean they can murder
people so why not let's just look the other i guess it's fine they got four people so you know
killing 300 and injuring another 700 reducing another entire neighborhood to rubble i guess
it's fine because they can do it no it's that that look at the end of the day they were also
under like a huge amount of fire this was a a very different environment. They're under RPG fire. So if you want the
hostages back, do the ceasefire deal. Look, I agree. You don't have to murder a single Palestinian.
There don't have to be little kids with their limbs blown off and getting amputations with
no anesthetic and no mom and no dad. And by the way, you know, a lot of hatred in their hearts
and God knows what they're going to want to do when they grow up. I agree that I wouldn't operate this way, but I just think this is very, very substantively different than a lot of hatred in their hearts and God knows what they're gonna want to do when they grow up I agree that I wouldn't operate this way
But I just think this is very very substantively different than a lot of the corporate bombing operation that we've seen all throughout Gaza the intentional
Withholding of humanitarian aid etc
But like are we really gonna say that operators are not to go into a war environment and not you know be in humanitarian aid trucks
Yeah, look
I'm just not gonna say that because given the fact that any U.S. citizen or others who are, if I ever get, you know, abducted, do whatever you need in order to get me back.
And I think that's how a lot of people feel.
Do a ceasefire deal.
Sagar, that's the thing.
You're pretending like this is the only option.
Murdering 300 people and injuring 700 others.
That that was the only, no.
And by the way, guess what? The reports are from the health ministry that other hostages were killed, including potentially an American citizen.
That's possible. Unconfirmed report. OK, that's not confirmed.
Yeah, but we do know that we had a quote from Israeli hostages, just one of the ones who just released who was talking to Haaretz, who said our greatest fear was the idea of bombing that we heard.
So don't talk to me about, you know, this is fine because it got the hostages back. No,
if you care about the hostages, do the ceasefire deal. That's what Betty Gantz, who, you know,
I'm no fan of, that's what he's saying. That's what the Israeli public is demanding. That's what
the protests are all about. That's, by the way, even what the Israeli military spokesperson,
Daniel Higari, is saying, like, this is not sustainable. The way, by the way, even what the Israeli military spokesperson Daniel Higari is
saying, like, this is not sustainable. The way to get the hostages back isn't to murder little kids.
It's to do a ceasefire deal and end this war. So no, I don't think it's excusable. And if you look
at the, look at past historical examples of successful hostage rescue missions, there was
a thread that somebody put out online. I wish I
had it in front of me, but you'll see like zero civilians killed, maybe three civilians killed.
270? No, it's not proportionate. It's not acceptable, especially again, when there is
a deal on the table that could bring all the hostages home and not require a single death.
I don't disagree that they should take the ceasefire deal. I agree the U.S. military
never would have done this. We have a much higher level of professionalism, thank God,
in terms of the people that we run. Our substantive disagreement is about the idea
that you're not allowed to use military force in the course of a hostage rescue mission, which-
Did I say that?
No, but-
I didn't say that.
No, but that's basically what happened.
So then how is that the disagreement?
But that's what happened, is that they went in- No, 300 people killed is unacceptable.
In the middle of that operation, their car broke down because they were getting RPGs and machine
guns fired at them, and they called in air support. The exact same thing that any Western-style
military would do in the exact same situation. They provided cover and bombing on the way in
and the way out. They did it during the day when there was a busy marketplace there,
and that's how so many civilians were murdered. Not to mention, they took out multiple residential
buildings, not just the two that the hostages were being held in. Not to mention, very possible
that they killed their own hostages in this operation. So no, we wouldn't have done it.
It's not acceptable. We have also committed war crimes. I'm not excusing us and pretending like
we're angels, but I just don't see how you look at this and say this was this was fine this was acceptable
well that seems to be what you're arguing i think it is substantively different than many of the
other things that have been committed and i know they say the same thing they say oh well we've
on the refugee well you got a hamas baddie so it's fine we accomplished our military goal
and how is this different because they were in the middle of a rescue operation this literally
is different whenever you have your own troops and civilians or whatever they are.
Insanely disproportionate.
I mean, it's just, it's outrageous to say that it's acceptable to have 300 dead to rescue four people
when you could get them all of the hostages and protect all of the hostages who are, again, at risk
because of the IDF bombing operation without killing a single person. I just, I mean, I just can't agree with this whatsoever.
The reason that I'm pushing back, Crystal, is because of exactly like the Ken Roth rhetoric,
this idea that, you know, you're never, like you can't dress in civilian garb. I mean,
I just think at a certain point, we all need to stop living in a fantasy land where everybody
is just going to be abiding by the laws of war. Oh, we're not living in a fantasy land. We're living in a nightmare. People in Gaza are living
in hell on earth. And so it's disgusting to me that we have U.S. politicians who claim this as
a victory when again, if the shoe was on the other foot and it was four Palestinian hostages who were rescued in an operation that killed hundreds of Israelis, no one would say that was okay.
And it wouldn't be okay.
I wouldn't say it was okay.
But because Palestinians are so dehumanized and considered so inconsequential, it's just fine to wave your
hand as it's fine for it to be collateral damage. Like I said, I think you're arguing against media
personalities, which I don't even necessarily disagree with. What I'm saying, and honestly,
though, if I was looking at it from a Hamas perspective, I was Palestinian and four of our
guys needed to be rescued and then people were shooting at the people who were going to go rescue
them and you did whatever it took in order to get them out. I'd be like, yeah, okay. I mean, I'm not saying
that's a good thing, but if I was in their position, I'd probably do the exact same thing.
Most rational nation states and or military groups would do that.
That's not true. You just said that we wouldn't do it.
No.
You just said we wouldn't do it, Sagar.
We would not plan an operation this way. But if we found ourselves in a situation-
Then point to the example where we did something.
It's been a long time. I'm trying to think about that.
Point to a single example. No.
Caleb Mueller, I think, was our last rescue operation.
I'm not saying we're perfect, right? We commit war crimes also. I've been very critical.
But you can't say any rational nation state would do it and also say we never would have done it.
No, I said we wouldn't plan a military operation this way, but in a similar-
There you go.
In a similar circumstance though, if our people were
under fire in the middle of a hostage rescue mission, there was no other way to get out,
absolutely, U.S. military would probably pull the trigger in the same way.
But you can't point to an example where it's happened.
Well, it's been. I mean, it's been. That's what I said. I don't even know the last time I had a
major rescue operation. I want to say it was Kayla Mueller with under ice. That was almost,
I think, seven, eight years ago since the last time. Now, we've operated in a very different environment. I can't necessarily say the same
thing. I think, again, we have a much higher level of professionalism and conduct than the way that
they execute military operations. But the disagreement, as I said, is both about the
difference in the way that they're, quote unquote, killing terrorists and terrorizing
the population as opposed to a single thing. And my big disagreement is with a lot of this idea that we're just
supposed to conduct military operations in some sort of world where everybody just abides by the
laws of war. It's not like they weren't getting shelled, shot at, and bombed by Hamas on their
way out, which is what happened. Yeah, I do think that we should avoid war crimes. I think we should
avoid massacring hundreds of innocent civilians.
Okay.
And by the way, there's a hostage deal on the table.
And by the way, this puts hostages further at risk.
And by the way, it fuels the hatred that will lead to more terrorism in the future.
This was a political play for Bibi Netanyahu in order to keep his grip on power at the expense of a
Thousand Palestinians between the dead and the injured okay
There was nothing justifiable about it
And I think it is a disgusting worldview that just dismisses this level of quote-unquote
Collateral damage as being acceptable in in any context
We move on okay, but this is what I'm saying. You can't
just say it's a disgusting worldview. It is. Then there's no operation ever where the right
of self-defense or military hostage rescue can happen under this. It's just not-
No, that's not true, Sagar. It's literally impossible.
That is not true. No, you're pointing to a specific context.
I'm talking in a bigger generality, which, look, I have not disagreed that there shouldn't be a ceasefire deal.
But, like, I'm sorry.
This is just a—that is, frankly, a pie-in-the-sky, like, worldview where everybody signs the Geneva Convention.
Yeah, you know what?
It's not—
And the reality is I would like to live in that world.
But that will—
But I acknowledge I don't live in that world. But even acknowledging the imperfect world we live in, you also have to admit
that our military wouldn't have greenlit this operation, that you can't point to another hostage
rescue mission that led to hundreds of deaths. And so to pretend like this is all fine and good
and just in the normal course of operations, no, this is outrageously outside of what the world has looked like and
what quote unquote rational nation state actors, including our own very imperfect country has done
in the past. No, what again, like I'm just going to reiterate, like it is, it really does come down
to what it was going to look like in the context of an actual military operation. Whenever you're
literally rescuing hostages, a vehicle breaks down. It's like, what are you supposed to do? You're going to die or you're going to get your way out. There
actually is a zero-sum game whenever it comes down to that exact situation. You are supposed
to protect civilians. You are supposed to, if you are a soldier, guess what? Part of your
responsibility is to risk your life to protect civilians. Yeah, I agree with that. Okay, well, that's not what happened here, okay?
Well, no, but also...
And again, don't greenlight such a dangerous operation to start with
if it's going to potentially lead to hundreds of deaths.
And if you care about the hostages, do the ceasefire deal.
So I just, you know, on every level,
I find it outrageous that this is considered in any way justifiable or acceptable.
This Pride Month, we are not just celebrating.
We're fighting back.
I'm Georgiam Johnson.
And my book, All Boys Aren't Blue, was just named the most banned book in America.
If the culture wars have taught me anything, it's that pride is protest. And on my podcast,
Fighting Words, we talk
to people who use their voices to resist,
disrupt, and make
our community stronger.
This year, we are showing up and showing out.
You need people being like,
no, you're not going to tell us what to do.
This regime is coming
down on us, and I don't
want to just survive.
I want to thrive.
You'll hear from trailblazers like Bob the Drag Queen.
To freedom!
Angelica Ross.
We ready to fight? I'm ready to fight.
And Gabrielle Yoon.
Hi, George.
And storytellers with wisdom to spare.
Listen on iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I'm Clayton English.
I'm Greg Glott.
And this is season two of the War on Drugs podcast.
Yes, sir. We are back.
In a big way.
In a very big way.
Real people, real perspectives.
This is kind of star-studded a little bit, man.
We got Ricky Williams, NFL player,
Heisman Trophy winner.
It's just a compassionate choice
to allow players all reasonable means
to care for themselves.
Music stars Marcus King, John Osborne from Brothers Osborne.
We have this misunderstanding of what this quote-unquote drug ban is.
Benny the Butcher.
Brent Smith from Shinedown.
We got B-Real from Cypress Hill.
NHL enforcer Riley Cote.
Marine Corvette.
MMA fighter Liz Karamush.
What we're doing now isn't working, and we need to change things. HL Enforcer Riley Cote. Marine Corvette. MMA Fighter Liz Karamush.
What we're doing now isn't working, and we need to change things.
Stories matter, and it brings a face to them.
It makes it real.
It really does.
It makes it real.
Listen to new episodes of the War on Drugs podcast season two on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
And to hear episodes one week early and ad-free with exclusive content, subscribe
to Lava for Good Plus on
Apple Podcasts.
Over the past
six years of making my true crime
podcast hell and gone, I've learned
one thing. No town
is too small for murder.
I'm Katherine Townsend. I've received hundreds
of messages from people across the country begging for help with unsolved murders.
I was calling about the murder of my husband at the cold case. I've never found her,
and it haunts me to this day. The murderer is still out there.
Every week on Hell and Gone Murder Line, I dig into a new case, bringing the skills I've learned
as a journalist and private investigator to ask the questions no one else is asking. Police really didn't care to even
try. She was still somebody's mother. She was still somebody's daughter. She was still somebody's
sister. There's so many questions that we've never gotten any kind of answers for. If you have a case
you'd like me to look into, call the hell and gone Murder Line at 678-744-6145.
Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
I agree that the ceasefire deal should happen, and in some ways I think we're almost talking past each other. But I guess where I really my major objection comes down to is a lot of the worldview
that is put forward, I would say, by a progressive left in the context of this conflict just leaves
no room for like a military to operate. And in a military to operate in a manner which I think
is quote unquote justifiable, not necessarily saying in this particular instance.
What I mean by that is hostage rescues, the ability to conduct war,
you know, this idea that you're not supposed to disguise yourself.
Sagar, how can we at this point? I mean, listen, the official number is close to 40,000 dead. We
both know it's probably far more than that. It's probably 100,000.
When we know that more bombs have been dropped on Gaza Strip than in World War II,
the devastation is more extensive than Dresden,
right? When we know you have the largest population of child amputees in the world, when we know that starvation has been used as a tool of war, when we know that our political class
and the Israeli political class and the entire Israeli society, with very few extremely brave
exceptions, so trivializes Palestinian lives
that hundreds of Palestinians being murdered
to rescue four people is considered acceptable.
When we have seen what's happened over all these months,
how are you going to criticize the progressive left
or whatever terminology you use
for saying that this is unacceptable?
Listen, I was never someone who said
that there was absolutely no room for any sort of military operation in the wake of October 7th.
But as we've discussed from the beginning, the way they've gone about it from the jump has been unacceptable from their own national security interests.
And certainly from the interests of respecting any sort of humanitarian and lives of Palestinians.
I mean, you have people who are starving to death.
You have a famine.
You have humanitarian aid that is completely blocked.
You have an entire hospital system that is completely decimated.
And so to say it's been unreasonable to object to the way that this war has been conducted,
I find that completely outrageous.
That's not what I said.
What I said is it's unreasonable to expect that,
it is unreasonable to apply, let's say, the same level of outrage logic, etc., that we would on
bombing a military or a refugee camp or leveling a building in order to kill one or two people who
allegedly may or may not have been there, as opposed to an operation where the fire was,
the vast majority of
the death, according to the Washington Post and according to the Financial Times, occurred after
the hostages were successfully rescued and their vehicle broke down as a result of Hamas RPGs,
machine gun fire. And there basically was a zero-sum game where they were either going to
die or live and be able to shoot their way out. That is a very, very different situation,
and one in which collateral damage is genuinely a tragedy,
but is very, very different
than how we would have looked at
if you had the option to do...
Listen, if you buy that logic,
that's the same as accepting like,
oh, but you know, the refugee camp,
yeah, they killed 200, I think.
No, and I'll tell you why.
No, hold on, let me finish.
Because they say we got two Hamas,
it was a legitimate military target. There were two Hamas bad guys. We got those bad guys. Collateral damage, let me finish. Because they say we got two Hamas, it was a legitimate military
target. There were two Hamas bad guys. We got those bad guys, collateral damage. It's sad.
The reason why it's substantively different is that in this particular case, they actually did
send special operating troops into the ground. Didn't kill that many people on the way in.
Allegedly, at least according to the multiple write-ups and other things that I have seen,
and that the vast majority of the casualties were suffered after they actually did what I have been saying they
should have been done from the beginning, which is put their own soldiers at risk and grab
their hostages in order to get them out. And or if you want to kill a terrorist in a refugee camp,
you should do exactly this. You should drop people down on the ground and you should go and kill them
and then you should get yourself out. So I think we also need to acknowledge that those reports are coming from what the IDF
is saying to. Sure. I mean, what else are we supposed to do? I mean, we have a limited amount
of Palestinians who are on the ground who are talking about what happened. Yeah. And they're
saying that the most vast majority of the deaths. So why did they have to decimate multiple apartment
buildings that weren't holding hostages? What about that? Also, what about the people who were
buried under the rubble in these apartment buildings that had nothing to do with holding
hostages? What about the air cover that they provided, quote unquote, air cover that they
provided on the way in, which also included gunfire and bombing? So, I mean, I just, listen,
I think we should just move on because we're obviously not going to agree on
this. And, you know, I just, I think it's wholly unacceptable to think that four hostages,
and by the way, other hostages possibly killed and put at risk in exchange for 300 Palestinian
lives and another 700 who have been, you know, maimed and seriously injured and more reportedly under the rubble. To think that that's acceptable or justifiable, I just,
we're just not going to agree. Okay, we can move on.
All right, there was another thing that was put out by Israel claiming that a,
New York Post wrote this up, this all comes directly from IDF sources, claiming that an
Al Jazeera journalist was holding three hostages in his home. This man's
name is Abdallah Al-Jamal. No one is disputing that he was in fact killed by the IDF along with
his family members when his home in Gaza was stormed. The Israeli military or the Israeli
government rather put out a statement claiming, number one, that he was an Al Jazeera journalist, and number two,
that he was holding hostages. As per usual, no evidence of this was offered whatsoever.
So let's put this next piece up on the screen. First, by the way, Israel had claimed that he was holding the woman, Noah, Noah Argamani, hostage in his home. Then when it became clear
that wasn't the case, they claimed that he was keeping the three male hostages. So the story was shifting. And there were a lot of inconsistencies
here. For one, Abdullah apparently lived in an apartment that was on the first floor in a
multi-story building. Israel claimed those hostages were found on the third floor. And it also, you
know, they didn't offer any evidence. So this is very much in dispute. It also comes, and we can put
this next piece up on the screen, from Al Jazeera. They put out a statement saying the ex-account of
the Israeli Ministry of Defense and some Israeli websites quoted the name of a Palestinian journalist
from Gaza called Abdullah al-Jamal and claimed that he works with Al Jazeera, that his name was
linked to what happened in the Israeli army's liberation of four prisoners in the central Gaza
Strip on Saturday. Al Jazeera media network confirms that he never worked with the network. He did contribute
to an op-ed in 2019, and these allegations are completely unfounded. Network stresses that these
allegations are continuation of the process of slander and misinformation aimed at harming
Al Jazeera's reputation, professionalism, and independence. So it appears like, and this was verified, by the
way, by other news outlets, he contributed to an op-ed in 2019. So to call him like an Al Jazeera
journalist is a stretch. And anyway, they don't offer any evidence that he had anything to do with
holding the hostages. Yeah, this was going everywhere because Jamal works for, and maybe
you can tell me more about this, for some organization registered
here in the US called Palestinian Chronicles, which is a 501c3 organization. So I guess it was
up in the air, the question of whether he, and by the way, why does any of this matter? Because of
a lot of the claims around journalists. And so we wanted to actually break down and to look at it.
I agree based on the circumstances, it does look like they originally
claimed that he was holding a certain hostage. And then based on the floor number that they then
changed afterwards, it's possible that he lived in the building. The reason why, again, this matters
is that I have seen this blown up all over the American right and like the pro-Israel right,
because now they're going after Palestinian Chronicles 501c3 tax status here in the US. But from what it looks like,
he did live in the building. Now, I mean, that's not necessarily a good thing, you know,
in terms of whether he knew or not, whether these people were being held in the same apartment
building as him. But from what they said, their story has changed twice now so far as to whether he lived or whether he was
holding these people or not. They also said that his father was responsible. And that's the part
where I'm very confused about from the initial explanation. Well, because the father was also
killed in the raid. So, you know, they're just there. Israel is should offer some evidence if
they have evidence to back up these claims, then, you know, at this
point, they don't deserve the benefit of the doubt in any respect. And so the things that are very
suspicious is, number one, the story shifting, right? Number two, the fact that they really
tried to time to Al Jazeera, which, I mean, it's preposterous. Like, I've contributed to some op-ed
at some newspaper sometime in the past, and that doesn't make me part of their journalistic staff,
right? And given the fact that they've, I mean, they've banned Al Jazeera in Israel, and they have tried to paint them as, quote unquote, Hamas. So they were clearly trying
to use this guy to further their own propaganda talking points. And then when you have these
questions about like the, you know, the floor number he lived on is not the one they claimed
that the hostages were being held on. Just, you know, there's a lot of reasons to be very skeptical, I would say, of the claims that they
are ultimately making here. Yeah, I'm waiting to see because this actually could turn into a big
thing here in the country in terms of congressional investigation. This could
be basically become the next like 501c3 thing. It's one of the reasons we wanted to get to the year, a lot of the problems of the drug war. This year, a lot of the biggest names in music and sports.
This kind of star-studded a little bit, man.
We met them at their homes.
We met them at their recording studios.
Stories matter, and it brings a face to them.
It makes it real.
It really does.
It makes it real.
Listen to new episodes of the War on Drugs podcast season two
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Over the years of making my true crime podcast,
Hell and Gone,
I've learned no town is too small for murder.
I'm Katherine Townsend.
I've heard from hundreds of people across the country
with an unsolved murder in their community.
I was calling about the murder of my husband.
The murderer is still out there.
Each week, I investigate a new case.
If there is a case we should hear about,
call 678-744-6145.
Listen to Hell and Gone Murder Line
on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,
or wherever you get your podcasts.
Stay informed, empowered, and ahead of the curve
with the BIN News This Hour podcast.
Updated hourly to bring you the latest stories
shaping the Black community. From breaking headlines to cultural milestones, the Black
Information Network delivers the facts, the voices, and the perspectives that matter 24-7
because our stories deserve to be heard. Listen to the BIN News This Hour podcast on the iHeart
Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is an iHeart Podcast.