café snake - du hockey brainroté [ Extrait Patreon ]

Episode Date: April 15, 2025

Notre Patreon: patreon.com/cafesnake On parle du brainrot comme d’une esthétique accélérationniste et on parle des Canadiens de Montréal et de leurs stratégies de communication à travers les transformations qu’a connues l'écosystème médiatique.Poilievre chez Primeau, Clic École, Thérapeute IA +++

Hello, I'm Daphne. I forgot that I was watching a black movie about a bear. I was really frustrated. I don't watch that movie. It's Café Snake. Hello, I'm Daphne. I forgot that I was watching a black movie about a bear. I was really frustrated.

I don't watch that movie. It's Café Snake. Hello, I'm Daphne. I forgot that I was watching a black movie about a bear. I was really frustrated. I don't watch that movie. It's Café Snake. Hello, I'm Daphne.

I forgot that I was watching a black movie about a bear. I was really frustrated. I don't watch that movie. It's Café Snake. Hello, I'm Daphne. I forgot that I was watching a black movie about a bear. I was really frustrated. I don't watch that movie. It's Café Snake. Hello, I'm 38. So today it's an episode that is available entirely on our Patreon. Patreon.com, by the way, Café Snake.

Thank you to everyone who subscribes, everyone who will subscribe. For real, there are a lot of episodes now that are only on Patreon. So once you subscribe, you have a lot more episodes to listen to. If you can't subscribe, you know what's free? You can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com.

And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com.

And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe to our Patreon.com. And if you want to see more of our videos, you can subscribe of episodes on Patreon now. So once you subscribe, you'll have a lot more episodes to listen to. If you can't subscribe, you know what's free? Put 5 stars on Spotify Apple! Paul, thank you so much! What are you going to talk about today? Today, I'm going to cover the fervor of the Montreal Canadiens series.

Which will potentially, or almost 100% all time, a race at the Stanley Cup, which will be in the national league. So I want to talk about the Montreal Canadiens, their communication strategy, but also the world of sports media. You, Daphne, what are you going to talk about? I'm going to approach the Brain Run as an aesthetic that would be accelerationist. Yeah. Yeah. So without further ado, place to...

DG News! Tadadum! Good morning everyone or good evening everyone. Depending on where you are watching... We're here at the AISTARTERPACK hostifide, it needs to stop. Munir Kadouri, aka Mayor de Laval, speaks about politics on social media. He reacts live on Twitch to events like 5 Chefs, 1 Election. The content we're going to consume online is going to be inflammatory, but that's the surface analysis of what we find.

Because people also know what they're really craving. It's long-form content. The parties also play the game of social networks. The way I read the history of the United States, between Democrats and Republicans, at the end of the United States, between Democrats and Republicans, at the end of the day, there's not that much of a difference. If you're a Palestinian or an Iraqi, you're being planted by a Democrat or a Republican, there's not much of a difference. I'm not a whore.

Rise and peace, but they had a dollar. I feel bigger, TSN, and way you see my past. It's incredible how this government is burning money for crap. This week, we learn in the media that the government will launch a new platform for schools called ClickEcole, which will be tested for 60 days... This week, Bernard Révin, Minister of Education, announced the release of a new website, app, software that will centralize all communications between schools and parents. We take up the Branding formula, Click, so we have ClickSanté, it clicks and now ClickEcole.

And I find it interesting because we are in the midst of all the scandal. The click of the commission that will have, the judge that we question his integrity, Judge Galan who was potentially appointed as commissioner. Then problems that would have been in the design of the site, in the crash, the bug, the waste of public funds. We're still talking about his click. And then we would say that we would move away a little from this branding. But no, Bernard-Rainville wants to launch ClickEcole which will be deployed in a pilot project from April to June and which wants to be launched in all of Quebec at the beginning of the year.

You need to know, I don't work in the field of education, but there are different sites that this application will replace, including Mosaic which is widely used by schools and other similar portals. This application ClickEcole will be made by people who created mosaics will belong to the government. So we say that yes, there is no problem with the sites right now but we want to centralize the digital services for the contact between parents, students, graduates,

signaled absences, whatever. It's just that again, we see the government contracting a private company to make this kind of digital transformation. And I think that every time it's going to be like we're kind of traumatized by what happened with the 1.5 billion that was invested in Click and we're like, ok, but is the government able to carry out this kind of project?

It was a promise from Françoise Leguon in 2022, Click and Call. The more we learn about digital transformation and this industry, the more we realize that in fact our governments, how governments operate in this kind of control people who need corporate assistance people who for each step of a project like this will need external expertise and it's not sustainable in the long run

and I wanted to come back to this because when we made the episode on Saclay I said that we will have to see what the commission's mandate is on Saclick. Are they really going to investigate how we're going to make this kind of transformation? Are we going to go beyond the framework of Saclick and really see what the approach that our government should have? Structurally, in the end. Exactly. And finally, no, it's just going to be on Saclick. We're just going to be interested in what went wrong, who is responsible, is it

Bonnardelle, is it Gilbo, is it Sonia Labelle? But we will not talk about the fact that it is a company like SAP, or like, I don't necessarily know the people who won the call for click and call, it has just been announced, I think it is registered in the same line and maybe it will be a great success click and call. I persist in believing that we must completely review the government's vision which should be, ok you like the branding click, but it should be a branch of the government called click that manages everything. Everything related to click. All the digital solutions of the government. So that was a brief thought

to monitor click and paste. Yeah we'll maybe come back to that, but that's it if we try to find a culprit, point a finger at one or two culprits, we'll potentially repeat the problem forever. Exactly, we're going completely off the track. What's the problem? As you said, it's structural. Yes, thank you. So I wanted to talk quickly about a phenomenon that I see more and more, which I called

chat GPT therapy, that is to say people who will address chat other to chat.jpt as a conversational agent, but also a type of therapist. And now I'm going to talk about a figure from Quebec Talk, who is quite famous for those who go on TikTok at night at least. And I'm talking about Marie-Eve Mongrain, a mother who lives in a caravan with her two daughters and two children. In Arizona. Yeah, which generates a lot of discourse and we might come back to her eventually. I don't want to do all of her pedigree, but let's say that she's a controversial figure. And then I came across a live

that she did this week around 1am where she was talking about ChatGPT and she subscribed to Payant services and it's really like a resource for her in her life. And she even said to use it as a therapist. I'm going to record a bit of the conversation I'm going to put in. She said things that I didn't even know about.

The other one, she was projecting her fears on me. If it was you, I wouldn't do that. Wow, okay. Okay. So, Chad G. Peaty has the advantage that he has no emotions. So, when I said to Chad G. Peaty the other time, I said, I said, Hey, I have the impression, we said that you think, are you tired of talking to me? Okay, you're a nerd, okay, and I said that.

I have the impression, I have the feeling that you're tired of talking to me. She said that one of the advantages of having an artificial therapist is the fact that this therapist had no emotions. So it was equivalent to something that was more neutral, a neutrality that perhaps allowed a form of objectivity that was even better than that of Charidos' therapists. Exactly, and also, since you didn't say it, she took the paid version because it comes with the audio mode of ChatGPT, so she doesn't write in ChatGPT, she really speaks and she responds in a oral way too. But it still comes back to this root idea that emotions equal subjectivity, so equals something that would not be neutral. I think it's an interesting subject to dig into, maybe we could come back to it, you will tell us. But you have to know that the technology of LLM, so the wide-language models,

it's far from being nerd, it's rather the tribute of all kinds of human values ​​that are embedded in the texts that we use to train these models. And it also reminds me of an article I read this week that was published in the Forerunner media, which I will put in the notes, on the Facebook agent IA, who would take a right turn, supposedly to better represent the two sides of a medal, so the both-sides-im, because we find that this AI would possibly be biased towards left-wing opinions. And there we say, for example, on the Meta blog, that it is a well-known fact that language models actually have bias, and that specifically, historically, these biases have had a tendency

to the left at the level of political debates and social subjects. It's crazy how the left has been attributed to all of this. Let's say that Google had a D.I. bias. You ask me, George Washington, and he does it in Afro-American, there wasn't a bias from the left. There was a bias from thewing ticket, there was a performance ticket. He adds that this ticket would be precisely because of the training data, so the training data that we find on the internet and that their goal is to try to

eliminate this ticket from their artificial intelligence model so that the model gives answers that really articulates diverse points of view, so especially a right-wing point of view. And that reminds me of a text by Kev Lambert that appeared in the press this week that talks about this tendency to want to represent all the points of view that we see a lot in the media, so the bot-sidism. And there I will quote it, the fact of presenting both sides, as often do the media, is not always enough. First because there are rarely

only two sides to a social phenomenon, and then by presenting two opposite points of view on a subject, the media run at risk of legitimizing dangerous perspectives, which defend, for example, the loss of rights and freedoms, inequality status, or violence against certain groups. And there, I will cite an analogy that I found quite... you know, like, imagined, and I found that it helped us understand. So, as some Anglo-Saxon journalists summarize it, if someone says they're crying and another person says they're not crying, the role of a journalist is not to quote them both. Their role is to look out the window to say the time they're doing.

I feel like reading this, I'm making a connection between a great language model like ChatGPT and the role of a journalist, but it's more and more the role that we attribute to this great language model. That is to say that we will look for information, we will use it as a source of information to inform ourselves about the world. Obviously, and as I will take up the words of 404 Media, but it goes in the same direction as those of Kev Lambert, it's really dangerous. When we approach scientific or even empirical questions, such as climate change or health, to approach these issues with a lens that would be left or right. If you want to come back to politics...

Of course, politics... I saw people in the comments on Patreon who wanted me to comment on the interview that Olivier Primo did with Pierre Poilieve. I think that when we record this episode, when the episode is released, he will have recorded his second one. I listened to the interview of Pierre Poilieve and Olivier Primo in all of it. Just to say how transparent it is. It's not going to come from a post. So that was the end of the free section of the episode of Café Snake.

To listen to the full episode, you have to subscribe to our Patreon, the Patreon.com with the word Café Snake. For all the new Café Snake auditors, because we see the mouth coming, the propaganda works, we have to continue. But I just want to tell you that there are a lot of episodes that are just on Patreon that will interest you, of our best episodes that are there. So I recommend it to you, it's really a good subscription. Yes indeed!

So that's it for a full episode with the next week. Bye!