café snake - L’été politique d’Olivier Primeau [Extrait Patreon]

Episode Date: August 26, 2025

Notre Patreon: patreon.com/cafesnakeMounir chronique sur la trajectoire politique d’Olivier Primeau et Daphné replace la mort du streamer Jean Pormanove dans son contexte médiatique, plutôt que de la considérer comme un fait propre au streaming. Aussi : SAAQclic (le crunchy), critique du documentaire sur Luc Poirier (le presque milliardaire) et retour sur la montée des mouvements évangéliques à Montréal (avec prières de rue). Recommandations littéraires au passage.

Good morning Yo, it's my name I'm gonna lookie just I'm gonna say, you know, do you, what's gonna say to have Hello, man, it's Daphne Oh, but I'm obliged, I read a film of one hour on an or something

And then, I was just like, I don't this film, that. It's a cafe snake. Good morning, Good morning Good morning Hello, all

everyone. Yo, welcome to Cafe Snake. A gross episode today. Yeah, of what you

go to talk about my name? I've applied my segment the Ete political of Lidier Primo, so,

uh, medit, to see, for the last for the what you're talking about? I'm going to

get back on the streamer Jean Portmanove. So I situe this event that in the

history of the media rather than it's like a new thing could be proper

on streaming or the air contemporary of the media social. So that is

very plus. So, today's a episode that's available on complete on our Patreon wwwWWPATRIONcom

baroblac Caffe Snake So, a month on two if you want all the episodes Every week Every month of

Caffe Snake You have to subscribe The Disney News To-Ro-Rum My name's Pink and I'm really glad to me

you're recommended to me by some people Hey Is this illegal Hey! Well, there you call, what's it? What's it? Who's who?

You address? And you're you address to who? Director National of the Health Public. What's what you're going to find? Do you see that? Are you that? Do you care? Hello, everyone.

And, yeah. Today, I'm in trying to pay me precious, because I'm the little brinds, because I have to I've got to get these little brindsie there. So, so, it's that, your little brinds. You see the little brinds that I have in my do? Napo! Lavo!

Lavo! I will never stop you to buy chocolate. So, so, so, it's that, your little brindie, I'll want you, like that. First, DJ News. I, this week, for real, I don't know if other people who are

have seen it, but I've been taken by the Commission Gallant, the Commission of Enquette on the Departement of Coo on the Platform, it's a week, it's a last month political, that we'd say, because there were all the attachies, the conciergey, and the ministers at the end of the week, who had in the occurrence, Francois Bonardell, minister of the security public, ancienement

to transport, and Genevieve Guilbo, who has terminated the week, who is actually Minister of Transport and Vice-Premier Minist. Honestment, it was absolute cinema. Absolute. Absolutely, cinema. It's your tele-reality preferred in this moment.

Well, it's not just that's, you know, the boss, the politics, it's the most great tele-reality to Quebec. DeBose, it's

a little like that, one of the big factors to be a minister, it's like, to have a non in the media

and be able to be able to be able to, it's like, one of the first criteria at the embouch. I checked

that, you know, okay, first conclusion, I, I realized it in listening that,

because many people think that the government is really more ordone, that it's a grand complo, and that the things are all in a direction, and they're

all all being planified for they're in this fashion. But when you look the Commission Gallant, you just realize at how point it's just these humans who are like things, and it's like really imperfect. It's made to arrive at the conclusion that the Government of Quebec would be in constant state of commission

of enquite. I think we'd have a subject... I don't know, I'd rather create a system for that there's all the audience public on the gestion of the money, the gestion of the

personal, the gestion of the apparel public, what is it? And what's, it's the forum that

create a commission of an question, because, you, say, let's the temoyage of Francis Bonardelle,

it's, like, true and true, it's three hour. Okay. Like, even during the study,

or during the conference of press or during the interviews, we don't have to go to kind of

what they do what they do what they They're the state, how they're They're taking decisions? Who is who is implicated in the decision? It's what their

O'Rare? What's they discuss in their Rancont? The fact that it's a certain fashion, non-partisan, that it's

the jurists, the commissaire, the procurer, the avocates, that, yes, the avocas they have certain parties, but

it's not in a tentative of, like, of partisanery, made in sort that, like, we're really really,

on the front they're able to dress meeting by meeting, the development, there are there, there's there's not

all the time, Sometimes it's true, you know, we're the Commissioner Gallant. He was like, I'm like, what's what I'm trying to understand? There's a lot of experience, there's a long experience, there, we'll let's these traces

written. Honestly, I think that problematic. You're you're well partied. I'm a minute. I'm still there. I'm an explosion of the coup. It's not me that he's written. It's your cabinet.

Nomenclature of what you've said at the date, 458, 620, and then we continue. Here's a list of questions that are, in my view, that are, to be able to ask. I'm not convinced. In any case, I try to have the responses to these questions, we'll give them not really,

in a time of tell. We're reassured at a time of tell. Why there's not a process of verbal? Why there's not someone who take some notes that's due, I have done

the matter and we're in the state of government Mr. Bernardel, we're not

in the line line minor. I don't know. Your question is good, Mr. Mr.

Commissioner, I've heard before invoking the same thing. I think that's a question to

which we have brought an attention particular. At this moment, it's sure that with the

event that we're there have had been The little response that would have been, so it would have been able to be to be able to, even, even, your reflection, and our reflection is the mine, because, well, we're trying to see what's going to see what, it's going to be four or five years of all, but you have absolutely right on, okay?

I'm like, I'm like, what I'm trying to understand? It's like, there you have a meeting on top. You have, you, the director of the SAAC. You're all there on a team's call. A runoff, there's a runoff, there's often, and there's often, and there's No, no process verbos, no note of this meeting, you know, so it's like,

we're saying, we're really, that in the phone... The faeys, the incompetent... Exactly. And we can just really have access to that, in this setting

that, you know, and then the media, especially, like, the commentaria political, each time there's a controversy, and even it's happened in this case,

the opposition, they're all right to start, and we need a commission of an inquiry, and we have a question of

the commentary political, oh, you demand all the time the commission of the question of the , we don't no, blah, blah, blah.

But it's dispendue can't even. Yeah, it's why that I think it would have to become a facet of government that's like

more perinized, which is budgeted and that function annually on the way to be this occurrence punctual that there's

like there's a community, so it's like you're like optimised for that all that so that's

so fast very fluid and that we choose maybe it's maybe it could be transformed in show

radio. In show radio, show television, show of TV, it's episode complete. With the commentator.

Well, with a streamer who got. No, but I'd Rally, I'd have to streamer during the fucking telemage.

Well, what's you're going to be able to streaming? Well, my setup to streaming is not quite We're not quite

their deco. So, so, the project is supposed to cut to around the $500 million,

and finally, it had cut around of a million of dollars, and it's supposed to be $6199,

638. You know, it's supposed to the timeage the timeage of Bonardell, it's too,

and I'm Why we're not don't give the 6.82? Because now we're that's 6.82. But in 20-20, he did all the time 20-21,

22, 22, 22, 22, 2, 23, 24. No, but it's the sort of shit that's, like, Info Man, or, like, Elvier Nicky, Fren, like, especially,

Info Man, I think, legit, he will do it do you have to do 20, 20, I'm not if you you do you do 20-20, I don't, 20-21,

22, and, yeah, in the comments of the Patreon, do we. The defense of government, it's that,

that we didn't what was going to until the verificatrice general of Quebec sort a report

that's out of the year that has made the gross controversy, it's for that we've used this

commission of enquiries. We don't know we don't know, we've made to make, we've made to make,

and this time, it's apparently they've been quite, especially Genevieve Guilbo because

what's that's happened and I'm that's so dramatic like the fact that it's in direct

even the redispision it's not the same the same when the When the procureur when the procureur

starts to read a courielel that Genevieve Gilbo have invited to the first minister and to his chief

of cabinet Martin Koskinan and there this courier there's like eight paragraphs I've heard someone at

the radio to say that's a real it's really a red and then he starts to hear that

the advocate of the government that's like no no no no no no it has

no that's why you're you're you're you're you're you're

good good you two I had to write you to write before Noelle for you let's keep the situation with the SAQ is intolerable when I'm going to

move to the salon blue to respond to an outrage to Parliament don't I'm not the cause and that my chief has seen to make attention to Chalb I'm wondering if the

angle inverse you have already traversed the spirit on the third-est and if someone has already preoccupied to make attention to the minister

an elucke is. Is someone has already inquired that I'mased because of the I'm not the impression.

I'm the Commissioner, I'd like to know the report with the

circumstances and the fact of a mandate there's a mandate, there's a recommendation

to make a recommendation. I consider that these questions and that the courier it is,

in my view, very important that a minister that is imputable, okay,

who is imputable, who does respond to the Parliament, have the right to address to, at least, to the first minister and his chief of cabinet,

what she thinks, the PDG actual of the SAC, and I want to hear Madam Guilbo, that's it. I'll say, it's very pertinent for my recommendations. What I please, is that you have a mandate precise. If you're not, I'm not, I'm not, the part, I'm not before me, the part of my mandate on the recommendation. Yes, the recommendations are the conclusions that are included in your, in your rapport. I invite, frankly, to evaluate,

and if you want, if we're to suspend, I can you come with some paragraph precise on the excess of competence. But I'm going to remit to your decision, malgris all. I'll permit the question, I will permit the proof.

Okay. So, I'll continue the lecture, before to come to questions. So I reprint, Orwellette Savoy and Peltier, that I respect enormously, have all in common to not

be the elective to be publicly by the decisions that they bring in the confer anonymous of their public with the

security of employment. For a rappel, when I'm doing to transport the October 2012, the deployment of Sacklick

was already organized before long time before me. And from, I've got protected all the

people, and I've done to get used to the merdii that's they're at the point

the PDG of the SAC, the Conset of the Conset of the Commission, the incoppetence,

it's they're that she's she's got a merdii and she she's made through on two

of boss by the government and she she's called the second stage the third

stage yeah we're yeah we'll we'll also come some of the recommendation cultural

we have the critical we're not not say just negative no it's not we're not

we're not we're we're we're we're talking so probably comment the content

the series keybequoise we're we're So, this year, we've regarded Luke the millionaire for an interrogation. What's he makes that Luke Poirier have reached or person has reached? How a Quebecois, who part of nothing,

can create an also great fortune in so few of an year, while that plenty of others are not capable, with a lot more of chance? Who is Luke Poirley? L.P., it's who, L.P.? Park, Pierre-Mix-Swing. It's on Crayve, so a documentary in three episodes on Luke Poirier, a speculator, that's my definition.

I said, a speculator and a collectioner of Chore Quebecua, principally active in the domain of the immobliere, but, like, how they's decry on Insta, it's entrepreneur, always more up, always more long, there's like an emoji

dragon, dragon. Because he's dragon in the eye in the eye of the dragon. Iron man slash philanthrop slash collectioneer of vature, when I was, you're not long, and he made his site

internet, I was sure that Luke Porrier had to have a site internet personal and I'm not tromped so much I've got written a book also exactly,

more than one and he is in trying to write an one that's going to be able to get election time Luke Porre I'm like I'm

like I'm like I know perhaps that it's me that's me who know the person before but I think

so that's the end of the party gratuit of the if you want to listen the rest you can go

go to go to go.com bar oblique cafe snake. Thank you to listen and at the same next next bye