café snake - Lignes Ouvertes #2 [Extrait Patreon]

Episode Date: July 15, 2025

NOTRE PATREON: patron.com/cafesnakeC'est les lignes ouvertes!! On répond a vous questions/takes tout l'été!

Hello, I'm Daphne. I forgot that I was watching a movie about a bear for an hour. I was really frustrated. I said to myself, I'm not watching this movie. It's coffee snake. Hello, I'm Daphne. I forgot that I was watching a movie about a bear for an hour. I was really frustrated.

I said to myself, I'm not watching this movie. It's coffee snake. Hello, I'm Daphne. I forgot that I was watching a movie about a bear for an hour. I was really frustrated. I said to myself, I'm not watching this movie. It's coffee snake. Hello, I'm Daphne.

I forgot that I was watching a movie about a bear for an hour. I was really frustrated. I said to myself, I'm not watching this movie. It's coffee snake. Hello, I'm Daphne. I forgot that I was watching a movie about a bear for an hour. I was really frustrated. I said to myself, I'm not watching this movie. It's coffee snake. Hello, I'm Daphne. Hello, I to the open line of Café Snake. As we told you, we are currently on vacation, but we are recording episodes of the open line

where you sent us your opinions and questions and we will react to our capacities. Munir, when does Caféq regular coming back in the wave? So we will come back to the news, live from the 19th of August. So until then, every Monday, you will have a new episode of Café Sneeq's open lines. Tidididu! I have a question to ask the government.

Is he listening to me? What's going on? The lines are open! It's Snakes coffee! Hello sir! Hello! Today I'd like to talk about Nick Suzuki. This year it's Laurenti's. Is there everything to get you excited about this place?

Yes, yes, yes. It's good for the camping. Cool coffee, there's not a 40-point mark. Pfff! Society in general. Well, I don't like it. I think we're already under a lot of American influence. I don't like it.

I'm calling because... So we're going to take Jeremy's take. Take 2, you'll keep the important parts, no matter how you consider it. But I wrote in your take, Café Snake, on YouTube, actually, to know how YouTube-Kilekwa will develop in the coming years. I'm going to be very interested in YouTube. At the moment, I feel like we're seeing G's of the time making videos on YouTube, becoming a YouTuber. There's also a R. Lee Primo who started on YouTube. Big names, anyway, who are positioning themselves on that platform.

I wanted to know what your take on YouTube-Kilekwa is, the content creation too. I'm going to go further, but you know Quebec YouTube is going to be on content creation too. I'm going to go far too, but we can see the journalist is changing, you already talked about it with Alexandre Lecq, a Canadian journalist who was close to Canada and Iran, to be on YouTube. Anyway, I'm curious to know your take on that, how it's going to impact our habits of content consumption on digital. Anyway, Quebec YouTube is going to be all in the next few years, in 3, 4, 5 years. What do you think about it? And thank you for what you're doing, always nice to listen to you. Long live to Carfaisnake. I'm going to talk to Jean-Len Leuzaisnake. I'm here with Jean, the second.

As you may know, I write for the news, I know that Gaplin is also writing for the press. I think you saw in an episode that the press is looking for, or maybe you will find, good sources to make videos of information on TikTok. And precisely, I wonder how you see the future of the media, more so, we will say, of newspapers, for example, the press, or the news, where we will go read articles, experts, chronicles, experts invited, chroniclers. Is the future of the press, of the business genre, do articles have to go through video

to then draw people to reading articles? How will the industry behave on information with all this information we have seen? Will people just want to listen to videos that relate to information, or will they still want to read articles with people who are doing research? I know you can hear yourself on that too.

What will the future of written information look like? Does it have a future or not? Well, thank you Jérémie. I think it's still hard to speculate outside of my personal media consumption. I don't think I'm necessarily representative of... I think we often talk about journalism, but what I've noticed is that there's nothing that really fits this term, that clearly defines it. In a precise way, there's no order of journalism in Quebec, for example. And I think we should rather talk about media practices or even journalistic practices. Because there are already... there are changes, there's Alex Plique and Nicolas Femme who quit Radio Can, they're not changes in themselves. For me, they're just people

who switch from traditional media to another form of media practice. The multiplicity of practices already exists since Belle-Eurette. That's it. And just in the case of, let's say, Alex Pléque made a summary of Topo de Radio-Canada in vertical video format, but Nicolas Femme, he was doing a report that is a little more varied. Ime, he was doing a reportage that was a bit more varied. I understand that he was a hater, but he was going to try to do humor, try to be a model only fan. You know, he was going to do a show that could go to any other channel, as more generalist type. He wasn't doing it in the big

journalism, big reportage. That's it, even within the journalistic profession, we're not journalists. It's very varied. Someone who does the chronicle, someone who does journalism, investigation, or just someone who does information, these three things are very different for me. I find it interesting to do journalistic practice, because it's the same for me too. Yeah. After that, for the media, it's still interesting. There, I can really just rely on my personal consumption.

So I think that the media writing will still survive, despite everything. Especially when the journalist or the media practitioner has a very very very tailored practice, as they say in English, like hyper specific, personalized, intimate, especially in the field of infowletters. I'm like an avid infowletter reader, I'm subscribed to a lot of infowletters, whether in Montreal, Quebec or the United States. And for example, these are super precise subjects, my interests, so what relates to, for example, technocritic or even web culture, everything that relates to the web, well, I'm going to go look for that information,

especially through the information letters. And even for what is geopolitics, the best way to follow what is happening in Gaza, is by subscribing to Dropsite. Exactly, Dropsite, but there is also Mundo West, so there are really institutions or independent media that are specialize in a subject. And I think that's interesting for some people who have particular interests. For example, someone who is going to invest in crypto, it wouldn't make me subscribe to an information letter that will give him the latest information, even analyses on the field of cryptocurrency. And what's interesting with this case is that I think that yes, I'm not inclined to go to the Radio-Canada website, for example,

or even the press to read the big titles, or even just to read. There is a very intimate relationship between the media producer and the consumer. And it's a direct relationship, there are no institutions that are in charge of this. There is a possibility of having a retroaction between the public and the information producer. That's what I notice in the media written, this idea of receiving almost all your information in the form of a mail. Well, already it's a relationship that is more intimate and you even have the opportunity to answer. Everything is a question of value, so for me, information or informed, like Alex is explaining, informed is cool, for me it's way too broad, it's vague,

it means absolutely nothing. People want to be informed, but informed on very specific subjects. Who do they want to be informed? Well, specialists in these fields. So we don't necessarily want touch-ups or journalists who are going to do everything and anything at the same time. I think there's a fatigue, that's it, in traditional media, or we can say institutional media,

the use of the expert is systematic. So for example, I don't necessarily know this subject, I'm just going to call an expert and we're going to give a microphone to someone who's going to explain something to me. If you don't have the tools, you can't throw your speech, you can't know what question to ask. If I had the opportunity to tie a relationship of trust with certain people, and I think that's the... the nerve of the war, it's the relationship of trust that can be tied. And it's not towards an institution that was drawn now, I think. It's really towards a person, a personality.

Someone who has proven his talent, his expertise, his rigor. Well, that's what I'm looking for. And if that person has a huge success and has built a company behind that person, it will come to the same thing as an institution? That's a question. No. No, it's not an institution, it's really... Let's say Hugo Descrip. No, but that's it, it doesn't work. You know, when we... That's the thing with Hugo.

Sorry. Just by the way, we would have just that, it's really late, it's the carnival and I'm drinking beer. So the more it goes, the less I'm going to be consistent. No, Hugo Descrip for me, it's not at all a good example because So the more it goes, the less I will be coherent. Hugo Descripe for me is not a good example at all because it becomes institutional, it becomes a media that touches everything, it has an ambition to cover everything. And for me it's just contrary to what I'm trying to express, which is really a unique, intimate link, specific to a person specialized in a field of interest. But what you haven't done yet, the kind of distinction, I think you didn't do at the beginning between information and analysis. Ok, ok, you're right. Well, that's also what I'm looking for personally, me, information. And I think I've already said it in other episodes of Café Snakes or even Sérieuse. For me, information is like saying a given.

It doesn't mean anything. A priori, you need a process of interpretation. And that's it, that's it. Do I trust that person to interpret the data, interpret the information? And then me, what I also want, what I'm looking for, is someone who is able to do it. So that was the end of the free extract of the open lines of Café Snake. To listen to the rest, you must subscribe to our Patreon. Patreon.com baroblique Café Snake. Because there is one episode on 10 full videos just on Patreon. So we'll see you next week. Thank you very much. Kisses!