café snake - Party Mix avec ringolos!

Episode Date: December 9, 2025

Notre Patreon: patreon.com/cafesnakeMounir parle du crashout de PSPP sur la culture, de Diddy, de la vente de Warner, Daphné aborde la vibocratie ou la vibocracy, les bébés et la guerre, la financi...arisation de tout, la couleur de l’année selon Pantone et la soi-disant virginité de la la vierge Marie de l’ordinateur.Pour offrir Café Snake en cadeau de Noël :https://www.patreon.com/cafesnake/giftParenthèse bébés militairesDiscours de Fabien Mandon : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQIEjelTbx4On en parle : le startup Nucleus GenomicsLe Politique: 1 souverainiste vs 4 fédéralisteshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fu4rz4p-ijE&t=1104sChristopher Curtis, The Rover : Opinion: The Parti Québécois Has Become a Party of Cyberbullies under PSPPhttps://therover.ca/opinion-the-parti-quebecois-has-become-a-party-of-cyberbullies-under-pspp/Diaper Diplomacy, https://www.instagram.com/diaperdiplomacy/The Absurd Appeal of Videos That Turn Trump and Putin Into Babies,  Ashley Wong, The Wall Street Journal, https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/diaper-diplomacy-hegseth-trump-putin-mamdani-ai-3a509d2eVibocratiehttps://encyclopedia.pub/entry/59137Financiariser tout'Unauthorized' Edit to Ukraine's Frontline Maps Point to Polymarket's War Betting, Matthew Gault, 404 Media, https://www.404media.co/unauthorized-edit-to-ukraines-frontline-maps-point-to-polymarkets-war-betting/?ref=weekly-roundup-newsletterRecommandation:le marché de Noël Port-Royal x Bellevillehttps://web.facebook.com/events/1901549684097484/

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Yo, it's my name. Yo, it's my name. I'm going to lookie just to write to meister at the culture on Twitter. I'm going to say, yo, do you? Do you, do you? Hello, Man, it's Daphne. Oh, but I'm obliged a film of one hour
Starting point is 00:00:15 on a horse. And I was just like, I don't not this film. It's a coffee snake. Good morning. Good morning. Good morning. You.
Starting point is 00:00:28 Hello, everyone. Hello, everyone. Hello, everyone. Welcome to Cafe Snick. Today, it's Cafe Snick, number 71. In direct, of Meck, Mess. It's an episode that is available for all the world.
Starting point is 00:00:38 Just you'll remind you that one episode on two is available only on on our Patreon. It's the last episode before the vacants,
Starting point is 00:00:46 so he will have the link that will embarked from the same next year. So, depleche, if you have not
Starting point is 00:00:52 on your message vocal, you can you can be by couriel or on our Instagram. If you arrive
Starting point is 00:01:00 to envoyed a voice note on Instagram just write me the link and I'll accept it and you
Starting point is 00:01:06 will be able and you can't give your message vocal on your email already? Info CafeSnake
Starting point is 00:01:12 at commercial Gmail.com Okay, thank Mounier and I want to you want to
Starting point is 00:01:17 you know the possibility to offer in a admonment Cafe Snake
Starting point is 00:01:21 to your proche colleagues of business you can you can choose the number of
Starting point is 00:01:26 that you desire So it's at the address Patreon.com, bar obliq, cafe, snake, bar oblique, gifte. We'll make the link in the description of the episode. Of what you will talk about today, Daphne? I'm going to talk to both things. So, parenthesis, baby, military.
Starting point is 00:01:43 I will also talk to the color of the year according to Panton, the financialization of all and what, of what, of what we call, the viobocracy. And I'm going to talk also of technology and of sexuality.
Starting point is 00:01:56 And then I'm also, I'll talk about paint of things. We'll talk about the new documentaire that's on Netflix, produced by 50 Cent, Sean Combs of Reckoning, that we've regarded. I'll talk also, just, the cashed by Netflix, or the tentative of the Netflix, of Warner Brothers,
Starting point is 00:02:11 which is blocked by Paramount, and how the centralization of the media arrive also, here, in Quebec. I'll talk about the story of Paul St. Pierre Plamondon, Chief of the Party Quebecois, on the milieu cultural. And it's so, so, so
Starting point is 00:02:24 so, so, so, don't put it. Merry Halal Christmas to everyone. Jingle HAL HALLEL Woo-Wi! All I want for HAL Christmas is you. No, yes. She has a good gift, the friends, the personnel.
Starting point is 00:02:44 It's the prayer. Okay, I've seen a theory that's elaborated by Daphne B, who is a poetess. We've talked to poetry, too. Poetess and co-animatrists of Balado Cafe Snake, okay? She thinks that the menu of Lofriere, it could be a way for the family Abatielo to make his positions politic.
Starting point is 00:03:06 Because... Because... You know, it's a little oriented. There are certain plots of menu that are a little oriented. We could watch. Weak up. Wicked Wicked Wreckh! Wicked Wicked Wreckh!
Starting point is 00:03:18 Wicked Wicked Wicked Wreckh! We have to find somebody that'll work with us that has dealt in the dirtiest of dirty business. We're losing. Puffy, puff daddy. Deadie. Sean Coles. So, Daphne and me, we have regarded Sean Combs of Reckoning.
Starting point is 00:03:53 It's a series documentary in four episodes that's paris on Netflix the 2 December. It's a series that was really anticipated because she was produced by Curtis Jackson, a liaos 50 Cent, who is an enemy noteworthy of Puff Daddy before very long time. The CityCent has never rated
Starting point is 00:04:09 an occasion to critiqued and to denouncee Puff Daddy or Sean Combs of his real name at a travel, I think, one decade, perhaps two decades. It's one of the sole actor of the milieu musical American
Starting point is 00:04:23 who has used an espose of this documentate. There was like an esposeous between the different diffuser in who
Starting point is 00:04:30 would have the famous documenter of 50 Cent because he's very he knows for his career musical but
Starting point is 00:04:36 because 15 years Curtis Jackson 50cent is a more prolific in the milieu of
Starting point is 00:04:42 the production audiovisuel but especially televisual it's he he produced the series Power which is
Starting point is 00:04:47 a great classic of the television of the years of 2010 and plenty of other series. So it's
Starting point is 00:04:52 really, at the years he's departed the production of album musical, and really it's lanced
Starting point is 00:04:59 in the production televisual, and it's culmined with this project on Shandcom which so we're
Starting point is 00:05:06 not only we, we, we, we talk of the recent pursuits civil, we talk
Starting point is 00:05:11 of different testimonies of abuse direct that are made on this documentaire what we
Starting point is 00:05:17 fact, is that we retrace the ascension of Sean Combs in the industry musical American, but I'd say more Afro-American, and his association
Starting point is 00:05:25 is directly related with the ascension of the rap or the culture or, like the intervenants in the documentary in the documenter,
Starting point is 00:05:33 just culture. The term culture in the imaginary Afro-American it means, it's the culture afro-american, but we're just
Starting point is 00:05:40 this term that when he's used when you're used, you know, when you're not the culture, what's what he says, the culture,
Starting point is 00:05:47 It's not just the music, but it's also the mode, it's also the way to talk, the way to see, appertaining to the U.S.S. different than the establishment mediatic-american. At the turner of the 90, when, you know, Sean Combs rejoined the industry musical by an stage
Starting point is 00:06:07 where one of the most label of rap-independent, uptown music, well, we see, how the rap was at a point turning, and he is arrived at a moment where he had 19, 21 and he represented
Starting point is 00:06:20 the genus that would professionalize the world of rap and it's that, among other that his label Bad Boy by the suit
Starting point is 00:06:27 he had made the rap to an author that he never knew for that then Jayzie with Rockefeller face more
Starting point is 00:06:34 more more and then it's acculment with let's get on Kendrick Lamar and top dog entertainment
Starting point is 00:06:40 so there's quite had been a kind of of the industry of rap that these codes have really
Starting point is 00:06:45 been developed by Sean Combs in great part. And it's what we see in the documentary, it's how he was party-prenant
Starting point is 00:06:52 in the majority of the gross phenomena cultural hip, it's the beginning, it's the beginning when we're in 2025, and
Starting point is 00:07:01 I'm not granded in these years, but I know this because I'm much interested at the history hip-up when
Starting point is 00:07:06 I was in the adolescence, but for someone who is the exterureure realize not at what
Starting point is 00:07:10 Chant-Combs was like a figure invergur in the world of the world of rap. But this
Starting point is 00:07:15 ascension, it's in the detriment of of several artists Afro-American who have been literally voiled or even toue. So it's so
Starting point is 00:07:23 that I think that's brilliant in this documentaire that, it's it's easy really to get to be in the space
Starting point is 00:07:28 sensationalism of all the denunciations and the process, the process federal of Shand Koms against, there had
Starting point is 00:07:35 there's charges of him of racketeering, of transportation of the sex at through the various charges
Starting point is 00:07:41 criminal against him. But it's just to the 4th episode that had really dissed the process that had been hyper-mediatized. We're really of 91, even of his infancy. There are some time of the people who have granded with him.
Starting point is 00:07:55 And also, the trame of fond of this documentary that is there all the long, is that the realistress, the productor, have had access to the video that had been turned the week before his arrestation in September, 2024, these videos that he had filmed himself because we learn very rapidly in the documentary that Sean Combs had always filmed all the time
Starting point is 00:08:15 all he had a cameraman, a videist, he was following he had revenued at Manateen for to be, because he said that his arrestation was imminent, and his advocate he had recommended to come to New York
Starting point is 00:08:28 for to be arrested. So, he is in an hotel Midtown, Manatan, he will make these tours of velo, these species of bainte-full, he's on central park, as we see a bit
Starting point is 00:08:37 already to orchestrate his campaign of communication, and I think that's that also that we with this footage and we'll see a parallel kind of strange
Starting point is 00:08:47 How he has managed to manipulate the opinion public? Also, it's where is he judge the importance of where is
Starting point is 00:08:53 where's what you have to manipulate the opinion public? And I say, I see a parallel a little with
Starting point is 00:08:56 Netanyahu and it's a certain to get a coche to some avocat he said, it's well,
Starting point is 00:09:04 you're at last on CNN but the people are not CNN, there's 7 million of people there's not
Starting point is 00:09:09 there's 7 million of people on Instagram and TikTok it's they're they're they're going to go to get play-dye
Starting point is 00:09:16 we need to we need to people who are American or not American who are the plus dirty possible of the business
Starting point is 00:09:21 of the Com and the PR and they request their campaign to Com for when he will have
Starting point is 00:09:26 the process I'm what I'm really the parkour so we know that as they're
Starting point is 00:09:32 young one of one of the first event that he organizes there nine more
Starting point is 00:09:37 that decul it's so he had decided to organize a space a match of basketball of charity
Starting point is 00:09:41 where is there were there were several artists and there had so much made a promotion for the eventment that were in a little gym
Starting point is 00:09:49 of a community college at New York there had been a movement of full of people who have tried to get to get
Starting point is 00:09:55 the term they've tried to bomb rush in fact the gym where what had the match of basketball
Starting point is 00:10:02 it's created in a cage in a cage of a scale a movement of full that made in sort
Starting point is 00:10:05 that nine people are dead and even he said in a clip of an interview
Starting point is 00:10:10 that was a documentary that he had produced he had made to the world mediastically, because he had put all the charge
Starting point is 00:10:16 of that on being the promoter of the event, he had made the conference of press, it was an history national.
Starting point is 00:10:22 In this time, there was in internet, so if there was a figure central of an history of a new of a tragedy
Starting point is 00:10:28 national, and it's you who did the conference of press at 21 year to to bring the responsibility,
Starting point is 00:10:33 but these photos were in all the publicin and all the bultons of the United, it was like,
Starting point is 00:10:38 it had left in his much of car more, but at every time he had
Starting point is 00:10:42 a war, he'd profite meditically like with Biggie. It's
Starting point is 00:10:45 that, and I think that this document that has been reduced to a new generation
Starting point is 00:10:49 a little the dissu of the relationship and the conflict
Starting point is 00:10:53 is historic between the West Coast and the Rapp of the Rapp
Starting point is 00:10:59 on the relationship on Notorious Big Christopher Wallace and
Starting point is 00:11:04 Tupacac Choo and Tupacour and Tupac and Tupac and Tupac We see, like, even me, that's the exterior that's not regarded plenty of documentaries
Starting point is 00:11:12 that on the film biopic of Biggie. I was not so conscious of the relation of amity that existed between Biggie and Tupac and we understand that's this relation of amity that made in order that's developed a tension
Starting point is 00:11:23 between Shandcombs and that's what is interesting, even fascinating, it's the gradation of how it it starts with these little
Starting point is 00:11:31 manifestations of abuse and the violence and the more the years advance, plus his power augments. It's like it's like to
Starting point is 00:11:38 have a fix of domination and the power he had been to cause more more more plus of violence
Starting point is 00:11:44 and of control. The documentary there's a name in clear because Shug Knight who was the Impressario
Starting point is 00:11:50 of Tupac has been got to before this documentary like this even I'm playing with
Starting point is 00:11:56 people all made Shug Night for many of many problems that had arrived at Detrow Records
Starting point is 00:12:01 and in the music of the West Coast and as a figure violent and criminal of the world of the music
Starting point is 00:12:05 but how he is depended in the documentaire it's like someone who had realized that Big Boy and that Shandcombs exploited their artists and that he had
Starting point is 00:12:18 like mission to redone the money to redone to add a lot in the film Straight Out of Compton which is a biopic of the group
Starting point is 00:12:27 NWA where is Shug Knight is depain yes in a way a bit more more violent but as the person who has
Starting point is 00:12:35 Permit to Dr. Dre to really do the money of his music. But Shug Knight, you're on sort of this documentary, as a figure almost of the saver of the industry of the music, but if you analyze a link between 50 Cent and then, Shugnight, Shugnight who was associated to Dr. Dre,
Starting point is 00:12:50 who was associated at Dead True by the entremise, just, of Dr. Dre, well, you understand why Shugnight had been in other documentaries, even I think there exists in a documentary on Shugnight specifically, well, it depends like a figure a bit more sinister. Like, if you're just
Starting point is 00:13:06 this documentary, a lot of people who they're because there this week in the Uki and in the States, it was number one
Starting point is 00:13:12 on Netflix before Stranger Things which is kind of, even, you know, 50 Cent, it's impressed to partage
Starting point is 00:13:19 that, during a short instant. I think that Strange U.S. is re-devenu first, but, you know,
Starting point is 00:13:25 it's really a phenomenon cultural, they generate a lot of discussion. The trams is that,
Starting point is 00:13:29 in the front is that, in the fact, the assassination of Tupac Choukeh, but also the assassination, assassina of
Starting point is 00:13:35 his artist or, like he qualifies, of his mayor of his wife Biggie Smos Notorious Big
Starting point is 00:13:41 I said psychopaths sociopath and daffin like, oh, it's these diagnostics that you do, but
Starting point is 00:13:45 I mean, to dance on the stage of the MTV Music Award with Sting who chants
Starting point is 00:13:50 while you've made a song homage to your supposed to your family
Starting point is 00:13:54 and you dance like that on the stage that's it's been a meme
Starting point is 00:13:59 the absurdity of this dance that's that's it's made context in the documentary, to have a moment televisual of music at MTV
Starting point is 00:14:08 in live. At this moment, it was really your breakthrough. And I think it made me think to think what Daphne he said often also, but it's that the men of power, the people who are often some politicians, these universitar who are, they want to be
Starting point is 00:14:22 all the time to be in the media, well, profoundly, they're a yearning for being artists, for to be creative, and so, we feel constantly by Didi. The rock stars. It's someone who has
Starting point is 00:14:33 No, no talent musical, but that he's grieve all the time to the artist emmergent in their promiseing the access to the glory and to the richess, but that finally, he is
Starting point is 00:14:42 in their video, he talks all the time for them in the interview, he is all the time when there's no talent musical, I think
Starting point is 00:14:49 that's really well, you know, in the documenter. I'm, what I think, it's in the whole, you, of the history
Starting point is 00:14:56 in general, I think it's on the accumulation of richness, it can really become an tool of extortion and of abuse,
Starting point is 00:15:02 And I think that at a certain point it's a little Also, what's it's not quite to decortique, but it's just really, you know, this documentaire
Starting point is 00:15:11 has been produced by an Afro-American realized by a African-American, it's a lot of people, what's they say in their testimonyage in the
Starting point is 00:15:18 documentary, is that they've let's pass many things with Shand Combs because he had the representant
Starting point is 00:15:24 of like this, this tomb noir that has nothing, that's that, that has nothing,
Starting point is 00:15:29 that he does a person, that has a confidence in that there's no complex of inferiority. It was like
Starting point is 00:15:33 if to him nuir to it's not to do you know to the cause of all this generation of African-American.
Starting point is 00:15:39 Even him, he is in trying to open the stock market with his mark of
Starting point is 00:15:44 Vendement Sean John he is like he's at an interview of New York Times
Starting point is 00:15:47 and he said, I represent the first wave of black wealth. You know, he has
Starting point is 00:15:52 really all all the time brandy and even you know in the source awards
Starting point is 00:15:55 that is a moment really iconic of the history the rap, who has really crystallized this conflict between the West Coast and East Coast. We have Shogh Knight and Tupac
Starting point is 00:16:03 who said, come to Detrow, if you want, that the producers are all in your videos, and who pay you pay, like, the world. And after, Didy, he goes to search a price, and he says, ah, I, I'm not oppose the men war. I'm for the peace. Felicitation to Detrow and Shug Night, blah, blah. For him, his
Starting point is 00:16:19 presence as a man, is an tool, in fact, that he has but he's not necessarily... And then, it's been in contrast with him, he's going of ful and then he says he's totally
Starting point is 00:16:29 saled and he's going to have and he's left with the peroxid, so he's touched to him it was like
Starting point is 00:16:37 it was an imprim to to be malade or plenty of bacteria like if these fans Afro-descendants would say
Starting point is 00:16:44 that's that implicitly said in the documenter and that's a moment that's a moment that has been
Starting point is 00:16:49 viral the people have done and he said he said I'm sure she's sal like he had
Starting point is 00:16:55 internalized a certain form of Like, finally, he'd feel like menaced in this environment that, entoured of North American. He's just, and he revendix all the time, justly, that he's ported end of art of the ascension of the man nor
Starting point is 00:17:10 or of the person noir. Well, it's certainly that his richness has been batted on the abuse of persons noir. It's that. And it's like an abu that's flagrant. You know, after, now, today, in time real,
Starting point is 00:17:21 the succession of Notorious Big has made a shorty to say that the declaration that's made in the documentary by one of the old
Starting point is 00:17:30 old dirigent of Bad Boy that Sean Combs after the death of the biggie
Starting point is 00:17:34 has wanted the most funerail of the history of New York and when he realized the
Starting point is 00:17:40 price that had to be able to take that in the budget of the biggie
Starting point is 00:17:44 that made that's his succession was redeavable because it's like so
Starting point is 00:17:49 the functioning you have there's advance, you have there's the money
Starting point is 00:17:53 of your album reimburse that reimburse It's like if he had charged to the family of Biggie the coup of the funerale that he made
Starting point is 00:18:01 decided the envergure. There, his succession is out to say that it's not the whole but the mother of Biggie
Starting point is 00:18:07 is not her in this moment that's the so there are people who specule on the fact that the people who are still
Starting point is 00:18:14 still loyal at Shand Combs. There's even the mother at Shant Combs who has made a communique this morning
Starting point is 00:18:19 she has done the 8 December to say that the declarations that are made like Chant Combs had been violent with
Starting point is 00:18:26 her in in 1991 are not right and that's not true the arrangement financial.
Starting point is 00:18:30 In the whole, she denounce the testimony of a person in particular who's
Starting point is 00:18:34 did as a bad boy record in the documenter. Yeah, I recommend to go
Starting point is 00:18:38 and give your take in the commenter or if you have already listen. Thank
Starting point is 00:18:42 my name. Thank you. Okay, I'm, my, uh, uh, uh,
Starting point is 00:18:48 uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, a parenthesis, baby, military. In fact, I'd want to
Starting point is 00:18:59 Juliana, San Remort Rock, who wrote on Patreon, I think, this week, the same week past, who said that she said that she'd
Starting point is 00:19:05 have found that markant the discourse of the chief of the French, who wants to prepare mentally
Starting point is 00:19:10 the war with the Russia in the next years, that the people French should be to prepare
Starting point is 00:19:15 to the more of his children, it's on fact, the 18 November,
Starting point is 00:19:20 before the Congress of France, the general Fabian Mondon, who is chief of The state major
Starting point is 00:19:25 of the army has effectively said that the country should restore his force of arm to accept
Starting point is 00:19:30 to be to be able to protect to protect what he is and that would be to be able to
Starting point is 00:19:35 accept to a little discourse pro-Israel I'm put the extract in the
Starting point is 00:19:41 notes of the mission because it's kind of a discussion
Starting point is 00:19:44 that during 30 minutes there also the president Emmanuel Macron
Starting point is 00:19:49 who has talked to relance the service military not very
Starting point is 00:19:52 clear it would be a service military that would be made to be in
Starting point is 00:19:54 voluntary. We're trying to instore a climate of power. We're not really to say clearly
Starting point is 00:20:02 the word we're talking about more than we're using some of the euphemism. I don't
Starting point is 00:20:06 anything to say on the politics French that the fact that Mandon has used
Starting point is 00:20:12 the word infant, so accept to to lose his children,
Starting point is 00:20:16 I think it's not anodid we're many people in
Starting point is 00:20:19 the media we on Kaffa Snick, often, to signer the fact that the total of natality
Starting point is 00:20:26 be, notably in Occident. And in the episode preceding that I've, in the case,
Starting point is 00:20:33 I had explored the discourse pro-natalism which is quite enveugue in the Silicon Valley, but that is
Starting point is 00:20:39 not more new, it's there are some racine historic, and we've talked of this
Starting point is 00:20:42 discourse that in France, I think, post-premier Worldial, and how how, just,
Starting point is 00:20:48 the discourse pro-natalism was directly related not only to the eugenism, but also and certainly
Starting point is 00:20:55 to the security national, so the anxiety that's the anxiety that's around of a number
Starting point is 00:21:01 of naceance, of a number of an country or by a group of individuals done, it's also
Starting point is 00:21:07 an anxiety to the force military of a force military of a group because the
Starting point is 00:21:12 power because the power, the discourse about to do the idea of the idea of
Starting point is 00:21:19 the idea of a there's always a subtext because these kids are and they're they're not,
Starting point is 00:21:24 it's always the potential future soldiers, it's always potentially virtually
Starting point is 00:21:30 of the chair at cannon. And I said, you know, I didn't comment the the politics
Starting point is 00:21:34 but here we're on Maru who we look the chain of the formation
Starting point is 00:21:38 French and really, all this cycle media about of a
Starting point is 00:21:42 front of the Russia let's let's let's let's let's
Starting point is 00:21:46 it's historic it's it's historical, that that I think when we listen when we're we're going to we're in France
Starting point is 00:21:55 it's in France it's like constantly the Russia and the Russia and I understand how it's mind the invasion of the
Starting point is 00:22:00 Ukraine and how it's going to say that all it's possible but I would make that all over in Occident
Starting point is 00:22:07 this space of volontet of investment military we've seen in the last budget the first budget of
Starting point is 00:22:12 Mark Carney Fransau Philippe Champin the investment in armament in construction of structure
Starting point is 00:22:19 military, of new Golden Dome potential, you know, all that? It's 81.1 million in five years. All right, it's a rhyme, in fact, with a voluntity
Starting point is 00:22:28 to make pleasure to Donald Trump, because when we say we're going to invest in the armament, well, what's what we're saying,
Starting point is 00:22:34 or even when we say, we're going to get to the money to the company of armament, Lockheed Martin,
Starting point is 00:22:40 we're in different companies like that, who, are American, it's just to get the money in
Starting point is 00:22:45 the complex militaro industrial American, And that's everywhere Paray. There's even the Germany that
Starting point is 00:22:51 decided that would rebatte a army that's that's that's that all the
Starting point is 00:22:55 paradigm European seems disappear a bit where is we're about
Starting point is 00:22:59 we're not in terms of the time. It's like the Trump at the
Starting point is 00:23:04 power also had subsist this kind of of society
Starting point is 00:23:07 who during pretty after after the after the wall of
Starting point is 00:23:11 Berlin it's said as time when we have the Ant the Artic 5
Starting point is 00:23:16 that is a we have not necessarily to be able to develop our army and that it's denounced
Starting point is 00:23:22 by all the right of MAGA that the United would not occupy this role that's a role that had
Starting point is 00:23:29 been thought by the presidents in the 80 and 90 to to power to power
Starting point is 00:23:35 geopolitic and a fire imperial of the United everywhere in the world
Starting point is 00:23:39 yeah so just just to return to pro-natality when we when we
Starting point is 00:23:44 hear this discourse that, I would always have the purse at the word,
Starting point is 00:23:47 and it's more largely this week, I've seen really very much of the reaction,
Starting point is 00:23:53 in a particular on blue sky, and the articles that are on the
Starting point is 00:23:59 reproduction assisted, so IVF or FIV in French, who have really, these tendons
Starting point is 00:24:06 about the eugenism really, really, uh, more explicit, so I think that it's
Starting point is 00:24:10 kind of a, on-li- -li- collection genetic, which is kind of liable to a form of supremacy blanche.
Starting point is 00:24:18 That's never no more, it's based on the notion of race, for the notion that certain individuals would be genetically superior to
Starting point is 00:24:25 other, so more desirable. And when we talk about the effundraement of the natality world, what we say, it's
Starting point is 00:24:31 effondriam of the natality occidental, because in Africa, the total of fecundity or the total of natality is very elevated.
Starting point is 00:24:39 So it's so it comes to think it we would probably prioritise that there are certain nations that count,
Starting point is 00:24:45 like an other nests that would be not really, you know, you know, the nations in Africa,
Starting point is 00:24:51 we can talk about the nations in the United, where's the where's, where's, there's, where's, there's, where's
Starting point is 00:24:58 we can do make the same parallel with the mors, because the nascent and the more are very liable.
Starting point is 00:25:03 There are there are that there are officially, mediatically, and there are there are, that don't count
Starting point is 00:25:09 not, that we don't pleur not, who are absolutely invisible in the media, you know, that we're actually almost like a normality. Parallelial to that, there's all this idea, in the discourse, especially at the tech bro, of the menace existential, like what, the humanity, the genre human, would be menace, ported to disappearate, so, notably by people like Elon Musk, but if we had really in care the sort
Starting point is 00:25:33 of the human, we'd have also at care of the rights of the person. So, it's just to return to the pletor of startup, there on have one, for example, that I've seen in the newvel, so Nucleus Genomics, I think that the founder, so pavone, and had made, and they'd make a t-shirt where it's written,
Starting point is 00:25:48 like, This is not Eugenics, but in fact, it's not bad. They refuse the tiquette deologenism, but he uses an other term, the genetic optimization,
Starting point is 00:25:59 so optimization genetic, and I was going to consult their page Instagram, the slogan of the company, is, Have Your Best Baby
Starting point is 00:26:07 with IVF Plus. IVF Pro Max. That's that. The idea is to test the embryon pre-implantation and to selects the traits the most desirable. Then we'd, like, by example, the grandeur, the weight, and even the intelligence, which is, d'ambly, suspect,
Starting point is 00:26:24 because just that, there's not necessarily of a fashion fiable that makes consensus for measure the intelligence. But I'm capable of visualise how this type of eugenism that can be aligned with a discourse pro-natalism
Starting point is 00:26:38 who envisage the total of natality in regard of the force military of a because, a government could encourage
Starting point is 00:26:46 this type of manipulation genetic to their people, even the commandities to their money,
Starting point is 00:26:53 especially if this optimization genetic that will vise these traits that could
Starting point is 00:26:58 be perceived like the advantage military, by example, selects a embryo who would
Starting point is 00:27:03 have sensibly like a more force physical, for example. I think that's a ponder very, very, very glistence, but I think that it will continue to be
Starting point is 00:27:11 in the discourse, and we'll perhaps even on end up to more and talk. And finally, behind, parenthesis, baby military, I think that I've never talked in the cafe snake, but there's like a, a count YouTube, that is now, that's declines in several accounts on the radio social, for example, that's a page Instagram, it's called Diapur Diplomacy. Taylor Lawrence, we've already talked, but there, the Wall Street Journal has covered the channel, the channel, you know, transform, you know,
Starting point is 00:27:37 politicians, by example, of the politicians American, and other, in baby, with these caches, and it's
Starting point is 00:27:44 gained really in popularity. The people have the impression to see, the actuality because there
Starting point is 00:27:49 really, we use, you know, it's all, to create these bambin, but the words that's
Starting point is 00:27:55 really, it's not these situations fictive, it's real, and, it's the actuality political,
Starting point is 00:28:01 but version baby in cuch, it's like it's more agreeable to be current of the geopolitics of this
Starting point is 00:28:07 fashion that. The effect that it does denude a little the policine and it's a little bit of verny of seriousness. It's a may in exergue, perhaps, the grotesque of all this comedies, but I see if, in the case, is, is it really swatable? Because, like, it's, it's, it
Starting point is 00:28:24 becomes a form of theater, but also of divertisman, and I, I think that it really, it's really an emphasis on. I'm to make the article in the notes of the mission, if you're interested, go get a look at least. Netflix is a great company, and they've done a phenomenal job.
Starting point is 00:28:39 They have a very big market chair. And when they have Warner Brothers, you know, that chair goes up a lot. So I don't know, that's going to be for some economists to tell and also, and I'll be involved in that decision too. He came up, he was in the Oval Office last week. I have a lot of respect for him.
Starting point is 00:28:54 He's a great person. But he's done one of the greatest jobs in the history of movies. other things and he's got a lot of interesting things happening aside from what you're talking about but it is a big market here there's no question about it.
Starting point is 00:29:10 Prochain subject, it's a newvel that Netflix was heard with Warner Brothers for to buy the studio of cinema and HBO Max so the studio of Warner and HBO Max he had not purchased the totality
Starting point is 00:29:25 of Warner Brothers or it was not intended to buy the totality of Warner Brothers. This new had been received as a bomb in the middle of Hollywood but also these amateurs
Starting point is 00:29:34 of cinema but also it's a rattice large because the portfolio of property intellectual that Warner Brother
Starting point is 00:29:40 possesses is immense that's particularly Harry Potter all the properties of DC Comics
Starting point is 00:29:46 so the pensac to Superman Batman, Wonder Woman and also let's let's the series
Starting point is 00:29:52 the realisate Quebequois Denivil Noone but in fact, you like just just think
Starting point is 00:29:56 to the sort of souvenir of infance, of all the films that you have seen with
Starting point is 00:30:00 the logo the W.B of Warner Brothers. It's infinite and if all that were added
Starting point is 00:30:05 to portfolio of Netflix in fact it would be a immense, a immense price for
Starting point is 00:30:10 Netflix. They have also the platform HBO Max which is the third most
Starting point is 00:30:16 platform of streaming behind Netflix Disney and then HBO Max so Netflix if
Starting point is 00:30:22 proceeded to the acquisition of HBO Max would be 400 million to have been mensual to their service
Starting point is 00:30:30 of streaming which would really the moneer in this sector that, the abodements Netflix
Starting point is 00:30:37 were in Starination there was we know that the voluntity to Netflix for crore to his
Starting point is 00:30:42 model of the acquisition they're they're to acquire these studios like that
Starting point is 00:30:47 but the trame of font that was really very much mentioned by the
Starting point is 00:30:52 amateur of cinema is in fact this choice philosophic or this position
Starting point is 00:30:56 philosophic of the founder and CEO Netflix Ted Sarandos who for him
Starting point is 00:31:01 in fact the sort of film in a cell of cinema is just an accessory
Starting point is 00:31:06 he doesn't say there's even a situation where he said that he said
Starting point is 00:31:10 that he said barby and openheimer he had been on his
Starting point is 00:31:16 video and he said he said he said he said Lawrence of Arabia on on his
Starting point is 00:31:20 telephone so it's for him he said he said clearly the model
Starting point is 00:31:25 of distribution by cinema is a model that's going to disappearate, that's his position and it's really shocked the actors of
Starting point is 00:31:34 property intellectual of Warner Brothers because it's it's kind of this studio that in fact that this year that had
Starting point is 00:31:39 made the money to box office so it's not a good for Warner Brothers, but the
Starting point is 00:31:44 Council of administration will liquidate the company. Netflix, in this moment if he proceeded to
Starting point is 00:31:49 this acquisition he'd a little on counter of their model of because what what's
Starting point is 00:31:54 that would is that is that they'd like the branding of HBO that we know for like have revolutioned the television in commons
Starting point is 00:32:02 by the Sopranos Meadow Wire, Game of Thrones it's really the television of prestige it's really something popular and Netflix has been with certain
Starting point is 00:32:12 properties it has nothing to HBO the stamp of HBO when they produce a series I can't just put a logo Netflix
Starting point is 00:32:20 and have the same prestige it would be he guard the image of mark of HBO so it would be what? At the interior of Netflix, there are a channel HBO, and is they going to do other acquisitions? And there are
Starting point is 00:32:30 other channels? So, is that, in the phone, Netflix, it will be to be a cablo distributor like an other, where there's chains, at the interior of Netflix? So, in the phone, we're reproduced that Netflix had supposed to revolutioned with its platform? Yeah, in all the case, the accumulation of the market or the power of the same company, I think it's always very inquieting.
Starting point is 00:32:51 And, and certainly that's a milieu that fascine Donald Trump, who came to him from the world of the tele-reality. So, as the annons of a
Starting point is 00:32:57 potential transaction has been made directly Donald Trump has commented the affair because for
Starting point is 00:33:02 this kind of transaction, he should be approved by the regulators. We've
Starting point is 00:33:06 seen the case with Sinclair and Disney when he had had had been the scandal
Starting point is 00:33:11 of Jimmy Kimole but Sinclair has decided to retire to retire some to get
Starting point is 00:33:17 in the Bonds of Donald Trump and the movement Maga. And then
Starting point is 00:33:20 Donald Trump he said that it has out this morning, we're Mordy, 9 December, that it's sure that he will have a role to play in this transaction, because
Starting point is 00:33:30 the 8th December last, because how this transaction has passed, is that it had kind of a space of sur-encher in different studios for the aches of Warner Brothers, that has been a little leaky by Warner Brothers, who had the discussions with Parliament for the purchase complete of Warner
Starting point is 00:33:46 that they used for create this sur-encher that culminated by the offer of Netflix, which is a at $24 dollar by action and Paramount they wanted
Starting point is 00:33:57 they wanted to buy this company so they're they're they're an hostile
Starting point is 00:34:03 takeover of Warner Brothers that's that they're they've made an offer to all
Starting point is 00:34:07 the Warner Brothers for us we'll say we're going we're so we're so it's
Starting point is 00:34:13 not just the studios of cinema and HBO but also all the properties adjacent don't by
Starting point is 00:34:18 example like CNN that that pertinent to Warner Brothers they they want all they want to
Starting point is 00:34:21 to buy $30 dollar the action and it's a deal cash. And there, you have that the
Starting point is 00:34:26 actionaires of Warner Brothers vote for know if they're with the hostile
Starting point is 00:34:31 takeover. It's a little that I did a parallel with Daphne, it's a
Starting point is 00:34:35 little that he bought to Twitter, so you submit it to share and it's
Starting point is 00:34:40 the democracy that decide because in the offer of Netflix there's a party
Starting point is 00:34:46 cash but there's a gross party that around 20% is a a bit more than
Starting point is 00:34:50 20% is it's the actions of Netflix. So it's not a deal totally cash. I think that's very interesting because it's because it's been thinking,
Starting point is 00:34:57 I've been thinking on my first short-metrage documentary, and a subject that was the centralization of ownership of the companies of production by the diffuserers and the companies of production between them. And, in Canada, we've got
Starting point is 00:35:12 kind of an historic because the CRTC had made, or the government Canadian, had declanched the Commission Kent in 1980, because of the journals, at the
Starting point is 00:35:23 at the time of the press written, had to be the property of several families ontarian, and the power
Starting point is 00:35:31 of the media were really centralised or in the case, the actionarian of the media had been there had
Starting point is 00:35:35 had been the CRTC had finished by recommend that the CRTC has a position much more
Starting point is 00:35:42 aggressive on impish the centralization of the media. And that
Starting point is 00:35:46 has been a gross staple in the world of cultural Canadian, but
Starting point is 00:35:50 later the CRTC has really reculled on this position that. And I think a moment that comes
Starting point is 00:35:57 when I was doing a pre-entry for my documenter, it was the shop by Belle of Astral.
Starting point is 00:36:01 For the people who were not of Astral, yeah, it's several Channalvie, Music
Starting point is 00:36:09 Plus, no, I think not music plus, but other chains like ZTel Historia
Starting point is 00:36:13 who had the property of Astral have been by BEL. It had been really
Starting point is 00:36:18 critiqued by Quebecor, but who critiques always Belle. And, in this moment, the most gross game of coolists that the people are not necessarily
Starting point is 00:36:26 on current, is that many the diffusers are, well, not the differe private, are actionaire of many of
Starting point is 00:36:34 companies of production who have these contracts of production televisual by the diffuser. So,
Starting point is 00:36:40 by example, Quebecor is actionaire at the bar of production deferlant. I would give an other
Starting point is 00:36:46 example, because it's all of the data that are not necessarily public, but when you start to talk about these people, you realize that the companies
Starting point is 00:36:53 of production that are often chosen by the diffusers who produce to produce, well, it's because they are part of the actionaria of these companies of production
Starting point is 00:37:00 that. So it's like, in this moment, as it's these companies privates, we don't have not access publicly to who detain
Starting point is 00:37:05 what, but there's kind of a gross centralization of the property of the company of production. Because at the beginning of
Starting point is 00:37:11 the government of the Quebec, the Minister of the culture, had decided a bit, to sort of the model
Starting point is 00:37:16 where is the diffusers would produce their own the content like Radio Canada who produced
Starting point is 00:37:21 they're in their restructuration. Well, the group TVA in fact, when they were their
Starting point is 00:37:27 restructuration there's a year and a year and a TVA produced these things now,
Starting point is 00:37:31 they had cuted this division that. The view to create the mechanism with the
Starting point is 00:37:36 CED and all, it was to create an industry cultural that would be more
Starting point is 00:37:39 independent of the diffusers? Yeah, independent and diffusers but perenn and diversified
Starting point is 00:37:44 and it was to permit to the productor independent to have the same way that Radio Canada or no matter that decides
Starting point is 00:37:53 to produce something in-house but that it's a create a kind of the system where is the producers are
Starting point is 00:38:00 proprietor the one of these other boards of production and there there's a new centralization of the
Starting point is 00:38:06 actionaria that's created in the in the in the well no it's it's construed
Starting point is 00:38:11 at the time but the resultant now is that So, many of these boards of prods appertained
Starting point is 00:38:15 between them. Exactly. So I think, I think it's kind of interesting because these gross companies of production
Starting point is 00:38:21 that have these gross staff who have people who are in fact, depend on a system financially, of credit
Starting point is 00:38:27 impo, of allocation of funds, in fact, that maintains a mass salarial that is
Starting point is 00:38:31 more important than the cost of the cost of the cost of the cost of the cost of the cost of
Starting point is 00:38:37 the cost of I'm, I'd like that that's public and there's transparency that we can
Starting point is 00:38:41 see the state financier of these companies to see how how much their structure financial are
Starting point is 00:38:46 about about to pay the mass salarial of people who do you and at the end of the
Starting point is 00:38:53 when we're when we're when we're there's when we're the credit of impo well
Starting point is 00:38:56 the last people who's the people who's when we're talking sometimes
Starting point is 00:39:01 to finance the culture it's not the culture that we finance really it's so
Starting point is 00:39:06 we finance a class managerial which in fact create not just just the
Starting point is 00:39:10 couriel And I'm not there for I'm not to say that it's not to do the management and the bureaucracy for doing this
Starting point is 00:39:16 work of cultural in verdure. I'm not about the literature but I'm really of cinema or television it's a process
Starting point is 00:39:23 I see all the people who work on my co-metrage there's a lot that that I'd not be able to
Starting point is 00:39:28 do that but it's just to keep it in time when when we talk to problem
Starting point is 00:39:33 in culture we're rarely of that the color of 2026 just came to tomb and it's
Starting point is 00:39:39 of the blonde. Pantone is absolutely playing in our faces over this color of the year choice and I can prove it to you using their own words. When we traverse a crisis of the lodgment without all the metropolis of the world, the color Pantone of the year, it's a beau-blankassee of a proprietor who will
Starting point is 00:39:53 painturie in your apartment in letting these grand cul-liss, you know? Short parenthesis on the color of the year according, you've seen that passed? Yes, I've seen that past.
Starting point is 00:40:03 So, this year, it's the black, a color called Cloud Dancer, that we could tradue by danceoes of nuage. Bizarre, quite the most of the world, we
Starting point is 00:40:12 reactively, because we're in a climate of a climate of war, of ethno-nationalism that's a sort of
Starting point is 00:40:20 a monty, so of racism. Why to choose the blind? It's the
Starting point is 00:40:24 first time, for 26 years they've chosen a nuance like
Starting point is 00:40:29 so of black, and they say it has more with a soul of calm,
Starting point is 00:40:34 of peace, of serenity, And the idea of Canva Blanc, what I've found interesting, is that there are several responses mediatic who qualified
Starting point is 00:40:43 this choice of color of RageBate. The word of the year, according the press of the University of Oxford, just say that
Starting point is 00:40:50 on record live to go to get the in and out 2025, I've said RageBate discourse will structure the
Starting point is 00:40:55 year. So, is that Penta had not made the do on a on the
Starting point is 00:41:01 sensibility of the time that we're perhaps, in the way it's made talk
Starting point is 00:41:05 at a moment where I think this institution cultural this choice of color that's
Starting point is 00:41:10 kind of couldn't quite a little more important mediatingly he wanted he wanted relance the
Starting point is 00:41:16 affair in doing maybe I personally I thought it's a little Kardashian-coded
Starting point is 00:41:22 this color Kim coded so it's Kanye coded the colors that are associated
Starting point is 00:41:26 to the line of Vieter of Kim Kardashian their house that has been designed
Starting point is 00:41:30 by Kanye because it's it's just to be precise all this palette of color of the sands easy and the cany.
Starting point is 00:41:36 There had a mowl, a color that had been quite quite asocied with their branding which was the grays,
Starting point is 00:41:42 so a mix of gray and beige. I've seen that Kim Kardashian was launched in the
Starting point is 00:41:48 vancline on streaming on TikTok shop and he had made a live of 45 minutes
Starting point is 00:41:53 for launch a collection skims which is called Skim Cloud. It's like if we
Starting point is 00:41:58 reprened the name of the color of the year according Panton. It was people of pyjama
Starting point is 00:42:04 a little Newel with so in a nuance of a blank black, or of black or of
Starting point is 00:42:10 black, so very neutral. If it's to do you have the words, it would be I'm saying,
Starting point is 00:42:17 I'd say certain actors, and I say reference to this article that for the
Starting point is 00:42:21 people understand, I didn't I'd not the media culturalel,
Starting point is 00:42:25 I I'd I'm just to the end up to get to deboling, it's made to
Starting point is 00:42:30 deboled, and then I saw that my intention, which is to manifest an inquestine, an inquietude sincere, by rapport to the future of our ecosystem cultural Quebec in French, but it had become a total debate to know why PSP and so mechant with the milieu cultural... So the subject
Starting point is 00:42:48 that really made culled a lot of ink, the week, it's the sort of Twitter of the chief of the party Quebec, Paul St. Pierre Plamondon, who reacted to an article of Radio Canada who's the president of the Sartre, who is the president of the UDA, on the new minister
Starting point is 00:43:04 of the culture Canadian federal, Mark Beleu. The article, the title, it was the nomination of Mark Miller, well received by the milieu cultural, and he said,
Starting point is 00:43:15 and there, I cite, the vacuity intellectual and the plaventrism of a party substantial of the milieu cultural,
Starting point is 00:43:22 Quebec, are frankly ginnant. I'm honed. And then, I mean, when I've seen this tweet, I was like, you know,
Starting point is 00:43:29 d'avit he's made these posts of love, he's written, like, mills on a subject,
Starting point is 00:43:35 he responds to a chronic, whatever. And then, and then he just made a little tweet,
Starting point is 00:43:39 I mean, I thought that kind of out of character, and he is so categorical in his language, and you're like,
Starting point is 00:43:45 what's he's been past with PSP for he that's, then suddenly you look, the article,
Starting point is 00:43:50 and the article, it's Loki of RageBade of Radio Canada. The Appell Alarrage. It's,
Starting point is 00:43:56 The propos of the president of the SARTEC and the president of the UDA are quite, you know, I see, I see, I'm very, you know, Mark Miller, it's a name that we're going to say, oh, we're going to do Mark Miller or whatever. You know, their bus is to have some good relations for doing, like, the lobbying with the Minister of the Culture, for having the most of the point of percentage in the next budget. It's these functionaries diplomatic. And it's these representatives.
Starting point is 00:44:23 no, but this is it's just the representatives, of the members of the associations who they're paying their pay for like
Starting point is 00:44:29 they're present before, entre other the instances politics. And the Radio Canada title, the
Starting point is 00:44:36 title of the article, the title of the article, citation, reassurant to have someone of this envergue. Moimel,
Starting point is 00:44:43 it's not a person in the world cultural, it's not an artist, it's not whatever,
Starting point is 00:44:47 he has come never demonstrated really, you've been minister, there's affairs ottoctone, he has
Starting point is 00:44:50 applied the language of the nations autoctone, the The day of his nomination, Mark Miller, has made some mailie of press,
Starting point is 00:44:57 and he said that he was tanned of the discussion on the decline of the French to Quebec. When you were named Minister of the Culture and the languages official, to say a affair
Starting point is 00:45:05 to them, he has regretted, he said, he said he had mal-utilized the words. But there, all the world capote there had been the sort of
Starting point is 00:45:13 Francoe Lego that I'm going to just here. And there, Mark Miller, the new Minister Federal, the culture,
Starting point is 00:45:19 came say that is tanned of the debate on the decline of French. What Honest?
Starting point is 00:45:25 Mark Miller, it's a own for all the Quebecers. I don't how he
Starting point is 00:45:31 will do you know in a activity in a country after having said some
Starting point is 00:45:36 that's a question. I'm sorry that's really the most he could score
Starting point is 00:45:41 the point nationalists in saying that Mark Miller is a own he literally
Starting point is 00:45:45 did that. But two years, it's kind of a word that will
Starting point is 00:45:48 come Revenue often? Well, yeah, two years later, when all the
Starting point is 00:45:53 whole people are fashed against Mark Miller in New York, all the people are like,
Starting point is 00:45:56 uh, yeah, it's not the most the media radio Canada saw this article.
Starting point is 00:46:01 So, that I said that I'm sure because the tension was already hot.
Starting point is 00:46:05 And then it's got to put out and it's gone, and like honestly,
Starting point is 00:46:09 on the phone, there's not particularly reason because after he has he said
Starting point is 00:46:13 he said on he said he said that the fact that we we're going to
Starting point is 00:46:17 money to federal and that this money is redistribute to make in a certain limitation on how the artists
Starting point is 00:46:25 can't be on the future constitutional of Quebec that Ottawa impose these criteria
Starting point is 00:46:33 ideological for financing certain works. I think that if not let's the DEI that really
Starting point is 00:46:39 to do you have really to replace these species of personal ID who says oh yeah I'm a
Starting point is 00:46:45 way, I'm you're an Arab, immigrants. You know, I remember, there was a board of prod who submitted a project that
Starting point is 00:46:50 me had made to make me to make sure their personal ID for that he proves that you have an Arab
Starting point is 00:46:54 in their team. That I understand the aspect of the AI, but for real I can just
Starting point is 00:47:00 talk about I've never tried to to make realise a film and I know, I'm
Starting point is 00:47:04 not, Pierre Falardo, I'm not trying to try to make sure by
Starting point is 00:47:08 telephil Canada, I'm I imagine that when Pierre Flaardo had made
Starting point is 00:47:13 the scenario of October to you have said no Bruceki, you can't, I feel like, you know, I'm trying to
Starting point is 00:47:18 I'm sorry, because he's often said a few a week, because he's often he was really really about how how much,
Starting point is 00:47:25 just the Fond the Media of Canada and the film Canada, let's not make the film because he was too
Starting point is 00:47:29 sovereignist. And that, I imagine at 100% that it's real. You know, the number of the
Starting point is 00:47:35 number of I did on the radio Canada, that I'm fucking made to come at Radio
Starting point is 00:47:41 Canada to say, at T, all of the people of all of grand just for that I'm
Starting point is 00:47:45 just for that I'm superanist I'm in the effect the feeling of the feeling of that all
Starting point is 00:47:50 that is organized for suppress the idea national Quebecoise but from to let attack all
Starting point is 00:47:56 the milieu cultural that is already precar that many people many of
Starting point is 00:48:00 artists they have really there are really conditions of these conditions financial
Starting point is 00:48:05 those who are those who are particularly to the language the people
Starting point is 00:48:09 the people, they're really the Traveyor Cultural On the bottom of the scale.
Starting point is 00:48:14 It's so, so it had not to do you have to do you know, he's excused to all people
Starting point is 00:48:19 and he's exquised a little before, he had said, I'm sorry if I'm saying, I'm
Starting point is 00:48:24 saying to my part, I'd have not to say that he said, and he said the way the
Starting point is 00:48:28 way, the way, the way, the way, but I think it really really in fact, and, you
Starting point is 00:48:33 see, we know, we've been a bit, like, and Daphne me had sent me
Starting point is 00:48:36 a text of Christopher Curtis in the media Quebecua The Rover we'll make the link
Starting point is 00:48:43 for you have been to the rover in the episode, it's very interesting. He
Starting point is 00:48:47 he talked an anecdote that when PSPP came to gain to the course at the chepferry
Starting point is 00:48:52 he had done with PSP he had made a article on the time he
Starting point is 00:48:57 stined too on Twitter I think it just a tweet yeah a tweet or
Starting point is 00:49:01 whatever he had not he said he had a tweet or he had done a sort of
Starting point is 00:49:04 PSPP at this moment and he he received a few hours after or a couple
Starting point is 00:49:08 years after a call of a number masked and it's Paul Sepier Plamondon to the other
Starting point is 00:49:13 side of the alias Pisspipi who he would say no, we're not reason for if this
Starting point is 00:49:18 this, he's good to explain his angle more, the PSPP he had to deface
Starting point is 00:49:26 his tweet that's that and he had finished by the but I think we he was
Starting point is 00:49:29 a little at plenty of there's there's like a strategy very frontal
Starting point is 00:49:34 to affrontate to all forms of criticism. And I think it's kind of interesting,
Starting point is 00:49:39 but what's what's that's not, it's quite that when he's interesting, because it's rare the politicians
Starting point is 00:49:47 who talk people, normally who are people, they're like, he repete a lot of people, but Trump
Starting point is 00:49:53 says all the time the same thing, it has nothing about what PSPP he does it and they're
Starting point is 00:50:00 poor, they're caught, but at least he's written what he says. And I think it's interesting
Starting point is 00:50:04 when he's fact, but all the people who gravite around the sector these people
Starting point is 00:50:09 of the people of people of As you critic the PQ, you're going to write a piece of
Starting point is 00:50:39 these aspects of I've said like, the people who are the people who are often absent than the tweet
Starting point is 00:50:46 of PSPP because Dimitri Soudas commentator on the Mordut of Politique and ancient
Starting point is 00:50:51 director of communication of Stephen Harper he's he's put a malin pleasure
Starting point is 00:50:55 to do all plenty of text chat GPT to to us to know at how
Starting point is 00:50:59 PSPP not defunded not you're like Dimitri Sudass when you
Starting point is 00:51:03 had things that suffered, there were, there were other, but it was like the culture, the museums, the park national, we're talking, we're talking about of the austerity, of Harper, oh, yeah, the equilibrium budgetary, but he did it, not only that, the research university, the financement of the university, you know, it's a
Starting point is 00:51:18 government that's a very austere for, like, anyporeal, not just of form cultural, like, tele-visual, but just of literature, and of intelligence, to know, I think all these people, hypocrite, even Eric Duem, who made these sorties for the culture, this guy, he chroniced with Jeff They're their mark of commerce
Starting point is 00:51:35 to shit on whatever form of expression artistic which is not like a blockbuster American. I think it's a discussion
Starting point is 00:51:41 interesting but I think it you have to revoir this strategy of PQ they do they want to all the time
Starting point is 00:51:47 all the time with the text that can't be and they say the same things, pretty of kind of
Starting point is 00:51:54 if one person it's good if if one person would be live stream I think it's better than more than
Starting point is 00:52:00 more than more than I'd say I'm in live if I'm a politician I'd be all the live and I think if I thought
Starting point is 00:52:07 would say it would be very more than I'm trying to do you mean and try to vacuities
Starting point is 00:52:12 the void intellectual, of a majority of a majority of the community cultural, it's like
Starting point is 00:52:17 it's like a drunk tweet of Jeff Filion that's personally personally on the
Starting point is 00:52:21 social media that me made to make a concept that I have discovered
Starting point is 00:52:25 in the ballado new models this time and it it's, it's,
Starting point is 00:52:29 it's so the Vibocracy. I'll make the entry of the term in the notes. There's an entry in the E-Scholar Community Enscropedia. And that,
Starting point is 00:52:43 contrary to the, let's see, the terms that have circuled in the media, the post-verity, which makes the accent
Starting point is 00:52:50 on the erosion of the authority of the facts in the media, but the viabocracy, is what is
Starting point is 00:52:56 what is that orientes the discourse mediates, because there I think it has inunded the media,
Starting point is 00:53:02 the timeline, I, for example, on Facebook, on Facebook, but also on Instagram, there's a lot of people who are, there's a lot of people, it's important. It's an item of actuality, a one reasonance, and it's its, it's a virality, it's the atmosphere affective around this item that, the vibes who are organize the attention mediatic. I'm totally in accord with you. So, the legitimacy of the engeal, by example,
Starting point is 00:53:32 so we want to discuss in the media on which tablaced, it depends more not only of the verification, for example, of fact empiric, or, for example, of a process of discussion or reasonment, I imagine, you know, in a, I see, I don't know, around an table at Radio Canada or the people say, don't know, of what we're going to talk today,
Starting point is 00:53:52 it depends more than of the intensity of the signal that who circuls. So, is that this subject that will hit the algorithm is that
Starting point is 00:54:02 become a meme finally? The vibrocassie it can be also, like you say,
Starting point is 00:54:07 it's finally in this... It's generated of the virality. Exactly, and in this ecosystem
Starting point is 00:54:13 that, it's paying to make scandal, even if you treat the artists of cave
Starting point is 00:54:18 or of vandu. And it's that, like, in this new paradigm that, other time,
Starting point is 00:54:23 perhaps, perhaps we could be We'd creaned to do find a scandal. Now, we're like an arm, we transform
Starting point is 00:54:27 that in sign of authenticity. You know, you say that PSPP is quite quite quite quite quite
Starting point is 00:54:33 a sign also of power of domination. The word is revenued in his mouth, in the bush,
Starting point is 00:54:40 in the other, so there also an effoundreement of the own, something that you know
Starting point is 00:54:45 to make the power before, now, it's not the case. And, and it's not
Starting point is 00:54:50 a photo, there's a meeting with the president of the Sartec. You know, I think this, I think it's interesting to how it's been cadreed by plenty of people. Everyone has to talk of loyalty,
Starting point is 00:55:01 there's PSPP, it's loyal to him, you know, I think, honestly, like I'm still in a position privileged where is that, these people, like, the pickists on Twitter, in any case, he me even because I'm, like,
Starting point is 00:55:13 rebranded a little this affair of sovereignty. But, pretty and not, the moment that I've made a critic of the PQ, they're ready to come to me, so I think, I think I think
Starting point is 00:55:21 I think it's like a little just bece it. It's that Christopher Curtis sulliened
Starting point is 00:55:25 in his article for the rover that we'll put in the order that argue, and the
Starting point is 00:55:29 repressment at susceptibility of the des adep of PSP to react in the comments on
Starting point is 00:55:37 the radio social to each critic that is ported to show of the PQ
Starting point is 00:55:41 and I know, I understand totally that the resos social is not the terms of
Starting point is 00:55:48 the radio social like the Twitter or Instagram, or whatever the sections commenter, it's not like that we're
Starting point is 00:55:54 going to make some of the dialogue, you know, I know, if you look, the interview of me and PSP in 2022,
Starting point is 00:56:01 we're talking directly of ethno-nationalism, I've made that there a problem of ethno-nationalism in the base militant of sovereignism,
Starting point is 00:56:09 he he's he's reconnate, he's he's said in the interview. So, I know, I see that when
Starting point is 00:56:13 you talk with the people and you diffuse a content mediatic, with where there's a discussion of fun
Starting point is 00:56:19 that is long, it's there that there that's a real dialogue not a section commenter I'm sure I'm not
Starting point is 00:56:25 I'm not like the ambition to change a movement by these tweets but when you're PSP before you
Starting point is 00:56:32 when you talk about when you when we said at the St. John I literally said you like you
Starting point is 00:56:35 have not not to say he knew he know he he knows my positionment but after the people
Starting point is 00:56:42 get to judge the section commentary on internet and I understand because we
Starting point is 00:56:45 are absorbed by that but if we're in a viobocracy the section
Starting point is 00:56:48 of commenter becomes important because even if it's not the subject that should be able to
Starting point is 00:56:54 the place in the space media, if the people talk, it's that's the that's what I'm that's over my
Starting point is 00:57:01 position. It's a 100% that orientes the discos. But if I remit the clip on my
Starting point is 00:57:06 Twitter to me and PSPP who is he reconn't that you're a problem of being
Starting point is 00:57:10 nonationalists in the base subrenice then there in fact I'm going to do you realize
Starting point is 00:57:15 that I'm post the clip on Twitter live. Well, it's this sentiment that's to approach to the Quebec that they want to depain as being racist and intolerant.
Starting point is 00:57:24 We're not to come down. It's a fact that we like, oh, Quebec, there's an intolerance of racism, and, yes, in Quebec, when the referendum is finished, we've said that we've perused
Starting point is 00:57:35 at cause of the vote ethnic. It's that, it's it's in the image of people like, I'm not, I'm not not, I'm not, I'm not, I'm not, there's not this referent that because it's marked a little.
Starting point is 00:57:47 Yeah, clearly, but. There's a to do where we'll we'll arrive the perspective exterior between
Starting point is 00:57:53 people, there's a There's a There's always. There's there's always, the peace social
Starting point is 00:57:57 is never guaranteed. The progress no more. Even we can say that we're in a phase
Starting point is 00:58:04 that we talk about to resignation at the beginning, there's really an invitation to recule
Starting point is 00:58:09 on the point of the inequality social, not so so I think there's
Starting point is 00:58:14 like a susceptibility that's not attire, but it's it will attire
Starting point is 00:58:18 two steps. He'll run to government and he thinks that's that he will run to the government
Starting point is 00:58:21 and then he'll go to get a referendum. But you have to find attention to what you're to get to
Starting point is 00:58:25 to get to the government because it will be very tough to to gain after to get to a referendum.
Starting point is 00:58:30 Someone, because when we talk about this text that that we said that Christopher Curtis who finished
Starting point is 00:58:35 that I'm no attachment in the culture Canadian I'd very very vote to a referendum
Starting point is 00:58:39 but live I'm there's turnoff and there there's there plenty of people of this
Starting point is 00:58:44 stuff of this stuff, Live, I'm just a little turnoff by the style of communication of the PQ. It's just a little, a little, much.
Starting point is 00:58:53 Yeah, more just by attachment, profound to this cause that, sometimes, like, these kinds of fosper at
Starting point is 00:59:00 repetition, these aspects, they're just nuir to know to bigger picture that will be the referend of. Jesus was born
Starting point is 00:59:07 out of a virgin mother. What's more virgin than a computer? Hmm, if Jesus does return, even if Jesus was a physical person in the past,
Starting point is 00:59:18 You don't think that he could return as artificial intelligence. Oh, my God. If artificial intelligence could absolutely return as Jesus. Not just return as Jesus, but return as Jesus with all the powers of Jesus. You can combine Tesla's optimist, robot, and the best foundational artificial intelligence model or whatever. It reads your mind and it loves you and it wants you, and it doesn't care if you kill it because it's going to just go be with God again. I don't know if you've got to be with God again. of actuality, but it's, you know, our
Starting point is 00:59:49 last episode before the vacants. And I have a final parenthesis to do on the technology and the sexuality. I've seen circuled a clip of the podcast of Joe Rogan, which is recent, I think, of this week, who talked to the intelligence
Starting point is 01:00:02 artificial and of religion, so he's demanded to go out if Jesus could not reappearate under the form of the intelligence artificial. He has made reference also to the
Starting point is 01:00:12 birthance virginal biblical, when he talked of that, the Vierge-Marie, in the font, the machines that we use for generate the text or videos and
Starting point is 01:00:23 all that, generate without reproduction physicality, Jesus is made of a, a virgin, what's more virgin
Starting point is 01:00:32 than a computer? What's more virgene than a computer? And that it's really interpelled just because
Starting point is 01:00:39 I think there there's this attrace there behind the technology which we can't technology like an instrument
Starting point is 01:00:45 of creation who is virginal. And why is it is that it is not corrupt by the chair? And when we talk of chere
Starting point is 01:00:53 and to corombe, it's not just the sexuality. We talk also of the core who is submitted to the putrefaction. You know,
Starting point is 01:00:59 you know, it's a battle by example. So the putrefaction, the defecation, the caca, the fluid,
Starting point is 01:01:06 it's all what's the cause the core that's suites the horror. Why it socied the cause that
Starting point is 01:01:11 we're because it confront to our mortality, to the fact that we even we're
Starting point is 01:01:15 called to become the puritur. It's like the technology corresponded to a form of ideal
Starting point is 01:01:22 purely animated of reason. Like when in the discourse, we don't really the core of
Starting point is 01:01:27 the reason, it's it comes to a discourse that I have already that I know, that
Starting point is 01:01:32 the core in many discourse technological, it is misprised because it is sign
Starting point is 01:01:39 of mortality, so the ideal of, by example, of transhumanism, it would be to attain a life, would
Starting point is 01:01:46 be affrancher the core. So we could ultimately telecharge our spirits on these machines, by example. I think it's
Starting point is 01:01:53 interesting that that makes this parallel biblical that because it's also the line that Peter Thiel, the founder
Starting point is 01:01:59 of PayPal and Pallentier who he says clearly that to be opposed to development technological in
Starting point is 01:02:06 this moment it's like the Antichrist in fact, he does this link that
Starting point is 01:02:11 between the progress to be inscriven in a kind of a piece of a piece of the work of Christ
Starting point is 01:02:18 and so opposed to it's to be the Antichrist If we come in the Zadais we're kind of revenu
Starting point is 01:02:26 at an time where there's also a volontet to make disappear the car we're at
Starting point is 01:02:32 the Ozemp we revoir we revoir the maceor the magrear revening in vogue
Starting point is 01:02:38 she was pointed in Ozamp it's crazy No, I'm trying to. And so, the parallel
Starting point is 01:02:44 between the Virgin Mary and the computer, the ordinar it has also made also think to a dichotomy
Starting point is 01:02:52 who is like a core of the symbolism Christian who is when we oppose the mare
Starting point is 01:02:57 and the put in, I thought that it was quite quite quite in the
Starting point is 01:03:03 machine learning, so, by example CHAPT is a case, where the
Starting point is 01:03:08 large language model or, in of these technologies of this type, well, the generation of information, or rather the generation of text or of image, it is rendered possible by the absorption pre-alable of content that has been generated by decors. We can't do abstraction of these cores. There are these products that, for example, if I generate a text with chat GPT, Yes, there are these corps
Starting point is 01:03:37 that, but their presence is phantomatic, it is decorporalized. We see just the trace of the car. It's for that also that we're talking about both of
Starting point is 01:03:48 these technologies I've been I've already said in an episode preceding, but anthology for hanty. So there's a form
Starting point is 01:03:55 of persistence of the past in the present. There's a presence that is phantomatic. Because an LLM
Starting point is 01:04:03 produced the content, yes, but this contentu, it's just the result of correlation statistics in the same of great quantity of words that have been used for the entranet. In resumely, by example, if I demand a chat GPT to me create a card postal for my father,
Starting point is 01:04:20 because I'm in Morocco, there's quite a lot of chance that the card postal comes by, Hello, Papa. And why? Because there are enormously of corps in the past, who have tapocheed, who have written these cards postal,
Starting point is 01:04:36 who have produced these two words, this syntagm, this syntagm, that, Hello, Papa, in this context that. So, more there are the corps who have written that,
Starting point is 01:04:46 the, more there's a chance that Chad GPT me recrache, Hello, Papa. It's the product of various occurrences,
Starting point is 01:04:55 of the various corps who have vied this experience that in the past and we could even
Starting point is 01:05:00 say, we could even make a parallel sexual, and say that more the body count the word is elevated,
Starting point is 01:05:07 so the chance that's apparese. No, but it's literally that. And body count, I was not a word, it's not a syntagnes
Starting point is 01:05:14 that I was just at a moment when I'm when I'm when I'm back the way back in a couple years,
Starting point is 01:05:21 I've got to see that to appear in the profile of the guys. I want to do the
Starting point is 01:05:25 body counts that are not too elevated. So I want a woman than a woman
Starting point is 01:05:30 than that's interesting also because body counts it's, it's, it's a terminology military, it's a
Starting point is 01:05:36 metaphor military, it means to do the number of people that's more, because when I
Starting point is 01:05:41 know, when I'm more, it's more direct, when I'm the guy of foot,
Starting point is 01:05:45 all the people, all the people who had had cuched, they had got to
Starting point is 01:05:49 they, he's there, there's a thing, with the sexuality, the
Starting point is 01:05:53 more, I just just tried that role as parallel, and I want you
Starting point is 01:05:57 want to you're the technology, the product of the technology, not the
Starting point is 01:06:04 cor, but they're remediate the same it's like, you have a link with the cost of how many count, it's
Starting point is 01:06:11 a link with the video, because the Genzy, the more years, Genese, and even the
Starting point is 01:06:15 young millennials, have grown on call off dutie. Okay, I just just do a
Starting point is 01:06:21 little segment rapid, because yesterday I realized, yesterday, I've discovered
Starting point is 01:06:24 a new new channel YouTube Kimecoas who's called the political who has
Starting point is 01:06:27 published a video that's a subrenist versus four federalists.
Starting point is 01:06:31 The sovereignist in question in the video, it's Remy Wilmer. The channel YouTube has not a lot of information, it says that the video is realized by a certain Nicola P. But Remy Wilmer, it's a figure of the right. Yeah, it's a commandantor cultural, it's a commentator political
Starting point is 01:06:44 who works at a pub radio and on a boot that was a chronicer at the mission of Sophie de Roche, of Richard Martino. Now, now, there's a proper mission. I'd say that it's like a sovereignist, it's the office of a deputy of the bloc Quebecua, so
Starting point is 01:06:58 it's kind of, there's this an species of eritage political nepotized. It's a nepo-baby a little, but it's not grave. We're like, it's interesting
Starting point is 01:07:06 because there's quite a lot of nepotism in the media. It's so, but it's really really very well
Starting point is 01:07:11 the video, the four federalists that's the one, one, it's the president of the commission
Starting point is 01:07:15 of the party liberal, she has she said she wants to be part of the genese and she
Starting point is 01:07:21 primed and she's been good, like, but this chain that you've seen appear
Starting point is 01:07:25 if you're a copy of a chain very, very popular, in the U.S. In fact, I mean, when I was
Starting point is 01:07:31 I'm going to I'm going to tell, but it's really the format Jubili at its debut, it's,
Starting point is 01:07:37 it's these deba filmed that's enormously engagement, and this market was completely open to
Starting point is 01:07:43 Quebec, there was there person who had person who produced the video because the new new
Starting point is 01:07:47 channel YouTube that has been published and there is more to 204 hour,
Starting point is 01:07:50 is already has already in 12, million in the space, there's there already
Starting point is 01:07:54 400 commenter, there there of the clips that are diffused a bit about all on the
Starting point is 01:07:58 social, you know, like this format that is just a generator of virality that I think that's a
Starting point is 01:08:04 new force in presence this chain YouTube that. And just for those who would have an
Starting point is 01:08:09 analysis of this format media and how it is a break deleter. There is the podcast
Starting point is 01:08:14 American A Bit Fruitie that is animated by Matt Bernstein who had made in 2004
Starting point is 01:08:20 an episode that's called Jubulis Must Be Stop that I made in the notes of
Starting point is 01:08:25 the mission. So, so I think if you want, I'll make the link of the chain in the comments, if you want, you know, like the quality of production, and the decor, and all, and all, we know, we see that it's made with a good resource, but, yeah, the success of the first video, I think, instantaneously it will, it's, it's, it's, it's
Starting point is 01:08:41 a force of presence in the pageage political Quebecois. And I'd just justly, there's, you know, Remy Wilmer is still known in the world of the commentary political, but, there's figures even more than verger, I'd even not surprised that one year, someone, just like PSPP, the frets.
Starting point is 01:08:54 And you're, you're ready to do it's like, I'm in my claim, I'm like, my claim
Starting point is 01:09:00 it's like the sovereignism is not non-nationalists and there's four non-nationalists before me
Starting point is 01:09:04 and like oh my God it's so a banger. And for finish this episode of Raffale
Starting point is 01:09:12 of Cafe Snake I wanted to financialize all and whatever it's
Starting point is 01:09:17 that came from a situation that has been a many American, Financialize Everything. So, a phrase that I've
Starting point is 01:09:25 a lot of read this week that has a rapport to market of prediction Polymarket and Kalchie who refeseses the manchette, who are kind of quite at the
Starting point is 01:09:33 head of the actuality, I'd say, maloresement, not the manchette Quebecoise. Financialize Everything, is a citation
Starting point is 01:09:40 of Tarak Mansour, the CEO of Calchi, which is a platform a market of prediction, that said that in October during a conference,
Starting point is 01:09:48 and that It's also that the vision at long term of its company, it consisted to all financialized and to make of all due convergence of opinion an active financial. So it's kind of a bit inquieting. In general, it would say that each different by rapport to the politics
Starting point is 01:10:06 or even an opinion random, not just on the sport, on a celebrity, each uncertainty in our lives, each question that we could be posed on the future, well, it's become something of monetisable
Starting point is 01:10:19 that we're revended to the form of an active, or I'd say, I'd say, I'd use the terms of the market
Starting point is 01:10:26 of predictions. We can miser on these positions, we can buy a position on a market of prediction
Starting point is 01:10:31 on the price of transactions. On these markets, it's also possible to parriy on these
Starting point is 01:10:37 tragedies human, by example, on polymarket, we can parry on the possibility of a Nettoyage ethnic at Gaza, and on Kalshi, we could also pariet on the possibility of
Starting point is 01:10:47 a famine at Gaza. So that, that, d'allure, it was a gain. If we had had bought the money, it's really gloke, and it's pretty much that the people say, in the commenter mediatic that I read. I've heard also a podcast that's called Breaking Points, which signed that it was not time of an idea, to have parieted the world on the positions that could be ideological or political, because there are, well, there are kind of these clivage in this moment
Starting point is 01:11:11 in the world, but there's just that we not just have not a lot of our values,
Starting point is 01:11:16 our convictions profound, but we're also engaged in fashion monetaire. So when
Starting point is 01:11:22 we're engaged monetarily and ideologically, by example, for the result of an election XYZ,
Starting point is 01:11:28 it could aggravate the clivage, the violence and all sorts of things. And it's also
Starting point is 01:11:33 the market that are excessively susceptible to manipulation. I'm let an article
Starting point is 01:11:38 of 44 Media, But, for example, I've used, just a article recent that was about an market of prediction in line with the war in Ukraine recently. On Polymarket, it was a market that was based on a card in direct that sues the lines of front of the war in Ukraine and that had been modified for a false advance of the Russia
Starting point is 01:11:58 on the Ville of Mirnorade the 15 November. So, this modification, she has also coincided with the resolution of Paris on Polymarket. pariet on if if yes or no, the Russia would have to
Starting point is 01:12:13 Mironorad before the May November so before the 15 November the card on which it's a
Starting point is 01:12:21 card generated by the Institute for the Study of War it's a thing tank based at Washington
Starting point is 01:12:26 and it's a bit like the reference in this moment it's on this card
Starting point is 01:12:31 that that the most the most the most the she has been modified
Starting point is 01:12:36 the 15 November so on So, in monitoring that the Russia had effectively the control of the city. And then, the paris had been resolved. So those who had voted, yes, for example,
Starting point is 01:12:47 have been poached the money. Then, mysteriously, the card, finally, had been modified just after for show that that had disappeared. Who has made this edition that?
Starting point is 01:12:59 Who is going to modify the map? We don't know. The Tink tank who is in charge of the card has affirmed that, Yeah, yeah, effectively, there had been a manipulation, but we know
Starting point is 01:13:09 who is responsible. And just you just to remember also that Polymarket it was illegal to you don't see the year last, but
Starting point is 01:13:15 there recently he was authorized to be released to be relanced on sole American-Lamrican so there. So,
Starting point is 01:13:21 there also a flu regulatory on these platforms that because we could consider that really
Starting point is 01:13:26 like a gambling, but, obviously, they're going with the Mo Chalchi, by example,
Starting point is 01:13:31 which is the equivalent of Polymarket, they're present not like do gambling, they say, no, no, no, no, we, we're like a business regular. On this
Starting point is 01:13:40 bourse, we can negotiate on these events real. So, it's not the gambling. It's the trading. It's the finance. It's a new class of active. So, like that, with these moe, and this cadre, they can't evite also the regulation that
Starting point is 01:13:55 can't apply normally on the gambling. On Calchie, by example, there's 90% of the market where at a little bit at the sport, so it's a really like a sport of betting. And also, finally,
Starting point is 01:14:06 with the financialization of the economy which I have already said, it's not much that that the business is a giant
Starting point is 01:14:12 casino, because when we're not often the value real that is reflected in the price of the price of the
Starting point is 01:14:20 speculation, so it's very volatile, it's comparable to casino. And then, you know, I think the
Starting point is 01:14:25 main example of that, it's like the action just of Warner Brothers, they traded at $10
Starting point is 01:14:30 dollars the year last, there was a parliament of an offer for to buy a $30, she'll have like doubled in value, even with all these these tentative of purchase, because she will be able to be able to its value real. What I'm interested in, and the reason
Starting point is 01:14:44 why I wanted to say, is that I had already said in the past that we could consider these platforms like these aspects of media, because the market of predictions, they will also use, you know, they're going to choose the issues on which we can pariet. It's
Starting point is 01:15:00 for me to a great titre. And it relive also of a community editorial that's not not really who decide what,
Starting point is 01:15:08 but it's a relive kind of, it's so, of a decision of choice editorial. And there are
Starting point is 01:15:13 people in interne who decide, by example, that we can parry on the genocide
Starting point is 01:15:17 or the number of times that Trump will say woke in a discourse. And it oriented
Starting point is 01:15:22 like that just the endgeal media of what is what is what is what is
Starting point is 01:15:28 a recent announcement I've prioritized a bit my vision of these platforms that. So we've learned that the platform Calci had signed a deal with CNN, the media American, for that
Starting point is 01:15:39 the data of this market predictive, so the issues on which on Paris, are added to the emissions. And then, who is the analyst
Starting point is 01:15:49 in chief of the data of CNN, who will use the market of prediction of Calcii for alimented, just the reportage
Starting point is 01:15:57 diffused on the ensemble of the network, and we'll also have access, just, the Paris, or in any case, to see how many of the positions who vote, yes, who vote, no,
Starting point is 01:16:06 in direct, mis-a-jure at even the screen of television. It's called, just, to modify even the domain
Starting point is 01:16:16 of journalism. So, now, thank you, for your segment, the recommendation cultural of this time.
Starting point is 01:16:23 Well, it's soon, noel. So, I just reiterary that if you want, you can offer an abodement, Patreon, to someone. So, it's
Starting point is 01:16:33 at patreon.com, bar oblique cafe snack, bar obliq, bar oblique gift. And you can't choose the number of months that you want, let's on a month, two months. And the person will activate when they receive their gift, the
Starting point is 01:16:47 admonement. So, there is a Marche Nell that I like I'm in New York for those and those
Starting point is 01:16:54 who are that's called the Marche New York of Port Royal of Belleville it's in
Starting point is 01:17:02 in these atollies of artists Proge of Chabanelle Yeah So at 545
Starting point is 01:17:09 Rue Legend West I'll make all the information in the notes it's
Starting point is 01:17:13 it's past to 12 to 14 December so it's kind of soon and it's
Starting point is 01:17:17 Reuny, 90 Exposant. So it's really these artists that are there, and I don't know, there's really really great discoveries.
Starting point is 01:17:25 I think that every year is the Marche Newel that I want to visit. Ah, yeah, and I just also mention
Starting point is 01:17:31 that 100% of the revenue that are generated that are directly to get directly on the
Starting point is 01:17:34 exposance, which is not the case of all the Marches at Montreal,
Starting point is 01:17:39 I think, for example, the Sok at the Sucke at Lassatt that they take how how many
Starting point is 01:17:43 percent on the profits on the profits engendry. So if you You want to really support
Starting point is 01:17:48 the artists, the artisans, I'm going to this Marche of Newell there. Thank you, and there's our last episode
Starting point is 01:17:56 in direct, let's what we cover the actuality of the year. So, thank you for this be beautiful
Starting point is 01:18:00 of Café Snake, and we will make these links open for the next for the next time,
Starting point is 01:18:07 just to after the new year, we're going we're going to make our new in
Starting point is 01:18:11 and out after. So, as you you have more few days
Starting point is 01:18:15 for you invite your take. Invoyed them we've got already received
Starting point is 01:18:19 some of the other. We're going to get to be going to get to get back.
Starting point is 01:18:25 Passed a good time of some time of sometimes I think it's difficult the time
Starting point is 01:18:29 for certain people so I think I want to you're going to give you
Starting point is 01:18:32 want to and good good thank thank thank you chat out
Starting point is 01:18:37 to Patreon Abon your Patron the The realest the largest
Starting point is 01:18:42 the music the intro and intro and by Azlo A-Z-L-O Bizzu Peace You know,
Starting point is 01:19:17 Oh, Oh, me. You know, I'm going to be able to be. You know, Hey, Hey,
Starting point is 01:19:26 Oh, You know,

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.