café snake - tite collab avec le département de la Guerre

Episode Date: March 4, 2026

Daphné parle de machines à meurtre automatique et du pouvoir narratif de l’IA (OpenAi signe un deal avec le Department of War), Mounir du rachat de Warner Bros.Aussi: Punch le singe et la culture de la mise à jour, sitdesk, les Trois Accords, notre déménagement (ouf!), l’OQLF policier, Guerre en Iran.NotesLe « monitoring the situation » producthttps://sitdeck.com/« Situation Monitoring Products Are Flooding the Web », Taylor Lorenz, User Maghttps://www.usermag.co/p/situation-monitoring-products-areBonjour-Hi? OQLF gears up for new secret-shopper language check, Andy Riga, The Gazette, https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/quebec-bonjour-hi-study-store-greeting-serviceHow OpenAI caved to the Pentagon on AI surveillance, The Verge, Hayden Fieldhttps://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/887309/openai-anthropic-dod-military-pentagon-contract-sam-altman-hegsethThis Machine Kills, the Shinji problemhttps://soundcloud.com/thismachinekillspod/447-the-shinji-problemDisintegrator podcastHOTHOUSE 2: Evidence (w/ Forensic Architecture's Júlia Nueno Guitart)Publication Insta d’Open Aihttps://www.instagram.com/p/DVUsK6Lj-ZC

Hello, good morning. Yo, it's my name. I think I'm going to lookie just to write to make sure of my sister at the culture on Twitter. I'd say, yo, do you? Do you, do, is what I'm sorry? Hello, ma'am, it's just how much, I'm going to watch an hour,

on an or something else. And then, I didn't even though it's a movie. It's coffee snake. Hello, everyone. Hello, everyone, be it back to the cafe snake. We're registered in direct of our new apartment.

After the demenagement, we're at a few hours of the end of our We're doing this episode So it's still Again, it's still can't It's been to add to the echo, in fact, because we're in a piece where there actually

No, no meble So, thank you to listen, today, there's an episode that is available for all the world Just you'll remind that one episode on two is available on completely on our Patreon

Yeah, at patreon.com Bar-oblakek is Cafesnake Snake And then, it's just mention again that it's not an episode normal. We've been really occupied all the week. And, me, personally I received some comments,

these suggestions really interesting of many people of auditors, auditors, and it's not these subjects that I have the good of these investigators,

but it's not possible this week. It's not really, it's not our week. The coffee sling, but anyway, of what do you

have talked today? I'm, I decided that I'd to talk about the little collaboration between Open and I

and what we call now the Minister of the War in the States I'm I don't know the

Minister of Defense or Department of Defense, but I don't why in the article I said,

it's often mentioned that's the sole true no, but I have kind of

to prefer the term that Trump uses now. Department of War because

it's like it's like more limpid, it's actually not of the defense that you

it's the air. And then, I'm going to hear. I'm going to return on the transaction

that's in finalize between Paramount and Warner. Paramount and the family Ellison

who will acquire Warner Brose. It's not Netflix, it's again a

interventionism a bit of Trump who will certainly reforming a big a grand

part of the industry audiovisual American so we are. They're more tarded.

The Diginus. Tulu For the first time President Donald Trump took questions about his reasoning for going to war with Iran. He just had a feeling that Iran was going to strike but denies he was pulled into this war by Israel. I might have forced their hand. You see, we were having negotiations with him. This debate constant on the identity Quebecoise,

on what is being a about the nationalism and what it's a represent cultural about. The macac

in the male male down to the mal question of the question of this image. This image

is a week also quite quite quite quite quite international. It's a little bit bad, but

I've decided to talk the punch media complex. Eventually, we're talking the little little stings

in the zoo Japanese, who had been abandoned by his mother biologic, and who has been also

elved by the garden of zoo, so, and there, he has reintegrate or integrate

the band of macaque after. It's these macaque. Yeah, it's that, I think,

reintegrate his bond, after it's been socialized by the humans, so there

kind of all sorts of the preuss to cross to cross and it's going to

get to get ridgeted in line not only so, but there's a poloche

IKEA, like of the support emotional and it's really attached to

this polo that that is a little like a kind of a little

how they it's clearly clearly and it is like the new animal

viral the web and all the media on the

press the journal of Morale there a coverture international.

All of the people do project a little bit in this sign that that's like a

moment when I'm when I'm when I'm when I'm particularly about it updates or

some new newels with punch I'm made to be used to knowy in my field

on the deruels of the day the end up the same especially the media complex I

think there there's a couple of other so for example the cinch punch is

FAPE Today, Punch Aptain to say bye with the man, Punch has a

rapproch with a other cinches Punch is made impuied by a L2.

I thought it was it was in the culture of the news update. It's a make sure

that many journalists American American, have post-bombard American American

Israeli of Iran so, so the operation Epic Furry and I think we

can't an bit bit Epic Fury. It's Epic Fury. It's Epic Fury. It's not free?

It's like, furry, not furry, you know, it's like a afternoon. In my head, it's in the same affair. They've said that

there's a through, or in any certain type of person or an engagement on the web, notably on the platform

X, I'd talk about monitoring of situation. So post-bombardement, the people were like, well,

in this moment, I'm going to surveyor the situation. It's To make the distinction between monitoring of situations

in the sense of a desire to be able to be able to manage a situation that has looked volatile, imprevisable,

in the view to capitalise on the because there, we think, as I'm often, you think,

I'm going to talk about, but, in the New York Times said that the New York

Times said that had transitioned at a pretty the majority of dollars. All these events,

finally, create like an appetite for the gambling. The people try to profite of these situations because it generates

a series of imprev on which we can pariet. And, according the journalist Taylor Lawrence, at all the moment all this

all over the world, and we felt that the war had been been declanche there's an trale of

an engineer informatic of that of coders, or, they're even of vibe coders who they

have made to create these aggregates of data, so these espets of applications for

see in time real what what's going in the world that's the product or the machines or in

the situation monitoring products, the products, the products, the product of surveillance of the situation.

By example, the more popular, it's set deck, a table of bar, genre,

that's all over that I know regrouped, the same, it's not the data classified,

the secret, you it's, it's accessible to all, but it It will be colligy together and it's all

people capable to access to all the time to get to the time to make you know, the market economic,

to cybermenace, those arms nuclear, the meteor, the firep aerial, the navires, the launchments,

and the vows of an kind of when we were young in the design animated where you

see the villain like the villain, like there's there, and he's that, and he see, and he can be able to

zoomed, on a quarter of the world and then, like all the people search to have this position that but not in the

view, you know, to really understand the world or to power finally to actually actually, or not really

just in a view financial capitalist to... In fact, it's that, they develop plenty of

subculture by a war. Yeah, there are the people who feel like speculere,

there the people who are, there's, and there also, and so, you saw,

you've with the war in Ukraine, the people who are fascinated, obscaded by just the war, and the tactics of war really, like physically. With Ukraine, you see, because he's more documented, there's more much of image satellite. Okay, here's the line of front,

here's what he's deployed, and here's what the drone... And it's a bit the same thing, with Iran, is that one of the attacks arrive, okay, it's, set avion that's all right, he's parted to there, on these canals telegram, you know, there's with these live update

of, like, there's like, there's like, Not from a point of view, political, whatever, but just in a point of view military, like, how this operation, it's deployed and it's executed. What's what I observe, especially on Twitter, it's a good point of, like, the interest that is ported

to the war in Iran, it's like how it is executed? But, justly, on Colima Keth, you talked to Ukraine, but I had talked in a long episode of KaffaSnake, of a market prediction that was based on a line of front. For example, is this line of front that

will attain a tell frontier before the, I see not, I don't know, just in a lot of what, but 27 September. So, it's become matter to do with paris, desiculations. And it's it. And it's just to the

game of the war, the bombardment in Iran by the States Israel that had been in the night of Wednesday, it's interesting that Daphne,

they talk of news Osler, and the fashion to monitor the situation. Is it, as we said, I was previously, we were in time, and I'm trying to do medicaid,

I'm like, I'm doing the time, so I'm doing, so, so, so it's arrived a little before two hours of the morning, the first bombardment, and then I was literally, on my telephone, I received a notification of Spectator Index, first indication that had had been abysed, I just became obsessed. I should have been to be, I'm going to be, Daphne, and she's like, oh, they're bombarded the Iran. A mis in parallel in the ecosystem mediatique

where we've you're in new updates on punch the macaque who's versus also a school

of a theater who's like a normally of more. And it's not necessarily maybe that

a day for a segment more more of maybe some implications geopolitical of all

that, for this region on Iran. You know, I think that's my objective

on some point, but just to say some mechanisms mediatics who have suite to bombardment of Iran. I think just

of one, I'm just surprised, tone of the time that's used to be, and then I'm just from here, because it's that I prefer to study,

not necessarily, what's what the United or in France, but it's more, it's three markets media, you know, plus Twitter, who's like American,

that, like, I monitor to use the language of the last segment. I think, in, we're, talking, we're, talking, we're,

with a tone of surprise. I'm not the person who's the money military, but there was there were kind of

build-up of force military around the Iran, there were many of airs around, many people

knew that was tramed, that's after the year of the year of the year, a bit sure

that would have a sort of a new chapter to this conflict that and I

think it's interesting because there there was there was a link with a

folder of Epstein Fase on a missile that's going to be

Terean like Trump tried to us have to forget the Epstein Fowl in bombarding

the Iran? I don't that's really that's the really that's that's going to happen what's that's the

government to do you eventually, the Iran would be able to be bombarded and he had to try

to the Supreme. In a fact, the population, even the people who have voted Republican, in this moment there's a

majority of people who are against these bombardments. Yeah, because they're they're against

because they're against the interventionist American, it's something that Trump himself has made his campaign there's like to be a peace president.

His coalition in this moment is in trying to do this defare. There are a lot who doesn't necessarily the interests first of the

United to do these bombardments and I think that it's more to regime Israelian and it would again again

a certain form of, not of submission but of acceptance of access of the of the regime Netanyahu to do you,

there we're trying to like, you know, we're playing the extreme, but you know, like Nekphoentes, he's so much he said, he said, he'll go to vote for the Democrats.

Like you say, the count of update, I'm, we're, we're post-Ukraine in 2022, but in 2020, but in 2016, it's, three

after year for a day, for the day, every year, it's really, that there's a conflict armed like that,

we're completely but submerged, of all plenty of content, of all plenty of video of of bombardment, there a

year, a year two and say, especially if you see that on Twitter, you can not really

to feel to see to what you know, it's like a expression algorithmic of war, so the

brouiard of the war, but in direct on direct on on the Twitter,

it's not too, especially in the first hours, like what is really past,

what's what's what's what's what, and then after, some

hours after the first bombardment, there Donald Trump report on Truth, that Ayatollah, the Guido Supreme of Iran,

is made to sue, and, more than it's confirmed by the Iran, but it's true confirmed? And the name, in fact, he's on direct at the TV, and that's, it's a propaganda, and it's like, you know, like, all to be, you know, it's, depending on the part of the T, so, justly. It's, it depends on the source of information to, at which you're brev, but I mean, I've got, I've been, I've been, I've been, I've been, for example, of several commentators,

journalists, if it's not, like, all, all right or all right, but... But when it's not... No, no, there's clearly, like, a propaganda well-installed, there's clearly a manufacture of consentment by rapport to that, but it's not functioned

like, by example, back in the days, in Iraq, that. Well, no, 100%. It's not something that... that, yes, that's surprising, just when

if we look at what's what's what I'm there's much that's there's

there's but I think there's there's that's that, there's there's

there's not there's there's, no, but how he's used, it's there's

there's a lot of there there's there's there's been there's been there's been

there's there's like, it's that the recinct that to the account,

I think, well, it's like, well, it's like, yeah, we're , there's plenty of, the diaspora

Iranian, everywhere in the world who's there's there, there many, there's, like, I'm,

I don't, I think, what I'm, what I'm saying, what's, it's true, and all

, it's when you see something, when it's when it's past, on the moment that you

see, there's there's a kind of sort of empiric, you know, the,

even if you see, some info-letters of people who are really informed, but in time real, there's just too of information.

It's what I mean, I don't know. I don't know exactly what's what what's going to know. And then, I heard of the radio Canada, it's

sure that at some they're like, they're like, they're like, really in mode of propaganda, like, thank,

Netanyahu, thank Trump. But it's because I think it's delicate, because there literally many people of the diaspora

Iranian who are exactly like that. The Iran, it's a nation in fact, it's a different nations,

it's a public, it's a country complex, rich of history. The Iran, it's not like an

kind of a kind of like a big city, with a big population that's a rich

history, it's a country, it's a certain form, yes, there's a

government authoritarian dictatorial that is there there there there before

but it's not a nation subdeveloped that has not infrastructure. You see, it's that the

gross difference with a country like the Syria or Iraq, who, they were developed but not at

the scale of Iran. The Iran, it's 90 million of people, plus the diaspora everywhere

in the world. So, I think it's kind of interesting that all the commentators

that we hear of people talk of political Quebecoos and the Chaucry

of the party liberal, we part on their grand analyses geopolitic,

even Matthew Bock Coate, who is there to know to talk, oh, yeah, it's like, it's like, it's like,

one of the lack of the commentia and the newvel in continue, it's like Michelle Cochene

who me talk, the geopolitic and Iran, it's like really not the sort of things

that I know Mark Kearnie who has made his beau at Davos who's

feliced everywhere in the world, who at the first occasion made a tweet

in support, oh, a good thing. Bravo the United Bravo Israel.

You know, at the moment where's he invited all the people of the middle

country, the countries to be to be in opposition or to be disan line

progressively of the United to be to form to to scourn to excrued

an independence, well at the first occasion he he makes a support,

and clearly, you know, why he's really, is, is really me fight with Donald Trump when I will

have to be doing this new things so it's like that you see that really Trump, with this state precar

that made certain economies in limiting or tariffing their imports in the States create an space of leverage

where is that certain or the majority of these decisions geopolitic that impact not these countries will be

the other countries will they support I just not not to pay with, you know, the Spain who's

suppose a little, who's disillings to Trump, and the Trump who says, you know, I'm going to make the clip, you know, who will be arrete all the trade

with the Iran, all the commerce, that's, that's, so, so, so, so, so, it's like, , there's

not, there, no, free speech, and, the, there, it's really, it's so, so, so,

we're going to talk, , but, there, my first observations on all, so I, wanted to,

I'm, of my, my subjects, preferer, the FIS, the language French who

who's in quite a quite quite if it's a little bit as a real a little bit a lot of

I'm in it's a question with a post that I'm at the pastry bouloges just at home to

see it's made to have by the OQLF like these media social

were not all the time in French or in any case not systematically tradu

the the proprietor it was like we were like we're like we're a

commercial familial, all, all of proximity. We're always being able to

be blind and he used to speak about it's like, it's like it's like some of the

thing, let's talk a video Instagram. So, that it had the tour

of the media, and more I'm there I'm doing a thing

I'm finally, I'm finally, other actors, in the accent of the

scene Quebe published, like they also were also it was made avertire by the OQLF by rapport to

their communication on the radio social. All recently in fact, I mean, I read an article in

the Gazette by the OQLF. It would be there have some have some have been

those observators that are sent in the next months visit over the $7,800 commerce.

There are there have already, but there's like if it there's like at each six-year-year-old. So it's a kind of monitorage, again,

of the situation. It's a beginning, it's in 1989. Typically, it's made at every yearn't, it's a few times, it's a time, and we're re-fait the exercise. So it's like if we

had resered, in a certain way, the measures policeire of the O QLF. And we're we're trying to 14,000 visits. The budget for this operation, it,

it's around around of $350,000 $350,000. It's these contracts that are done to do not that's really more to get

to get to than more than more than other in the region, the places of Montreal that are

known for are more anglophone and with the population who are issued of immigration.

And there, what I found interesting in reading this article that, and that I didn't

know to do my rapprochement OQLF equal the police, is that

the the OQLF, has more than doubled since the KACC is at in 2018. In this moment, it's rendered 49 million, which is really interesting because

I'm talking in the micro of Café Snake, but I think that the resources for to put from the front of the language

that's a important to the grand dictionary terminological, which is one of the creation far of the Office

Quebec-of-the-Longue of the language is very little renewed, very few active.

There's plenty of terms that I try try to try to because I'm not in the GDP.

I thought we'd like a pattern to see, if we're an organization governmental and we

want to have more more of money, then it's also to take an orientation more

policeier. It's also with the law 96, it between the workers for

to ensure that the work is to the time? It's all of the law 96 that the

could give some people would do they work in English? Yeah, it's that, but you know, one of the

mandatory for me, in the OQLF from his foundation, it's the enrichment of the language

Quebecoise Francophone. The office does be to the correction and the enrichment of language

and written to Quebec recommend or normalize of the terms and expressions. So, literally, what I've said by rapport to the

terminology. So, for example, if there's a new term that integr the language current, I think, for example, the AI Slop,

we'd be able to find the equivalent of the Equivalance on the OQLF. And then, I was going just to consult the

page on their site web that established the mission of the OQLF. It's been in December, so it's

relatively little time. And, And, just, this mission, she has disappeared. In the case, I've been seen, like, a discourse that had been readied in 2011, so it's made a vote by the president, director-general of the time, Louise Marchant, and she met her really accent on the fact that the OQLF had a notoriety

international, in course of her creativity and the tools original that she had made in place, don't the grand dictionary terminological, the bank of deppanage linguistic. It's something that is almost, I'd say, pretty, I'd say, perhaps disappeared, genre,

of the mission of L'OQLF, which is more like a police. In Quebec, on the UQLF, yeah, but, you, it's a d'omache, because, you know, the language French, we can let's make

to the avant, we can't assure that she's sure that she's, rich, dynamic, and what I, it's more, the police of the language

who's assure that all the people talk French but in some of the parameters super rigid,

in fact, the sole thing I've seen that I'm making it that's the vastity of the

language on their site is a concour which I've never heard that's

that's that's annual so at every year and that recompense like that

some of people who can just have having a merit by a lot

of the company and there's enterprises. And then, you know, it's so, it's so much bizarre, because I'm

kind of a practitioner, a true of a person, and I never heard of this concourne, so I don't see who's

who's the jury, how we're doing it's they're doing repcompose they're they're recompensate in the

publicality by the toponimi and also of the companies, let's say, let's say,

let's say, they've done a win a Wawa RAUA Assurance, at Deloate. Deloate.

Deloite. The technologies move AI, you don't give the price to to do some companies of the consultations. It's like what do you know. And what the fact? And what's interesting

also is that the Gazette has made really a nasty of gross dossier on the OQLF in this moment. And I've learned by that that, you know, there's problems

at the level of how the inquiries and the clients mystery, how the inquiries are conducted. By example,

the people who employe, these firms that private, it's often of people who appartain to minority visible.

There's a term that's called linguistic profiling. Apparently, it's that when you see someone you know what you

have an minority visible, in the case, you know, maybe someone to have a race-sise, here at

this to this francophone to talk about to you're to address to this person in English. I'm not

that's not true, I'm not sure, I'm not and I've worked long time in service to the clientele,

like I was in general, let's so, so there were, in between 2022 and 2003, he had engaged the company Segment Research for doing this

study with these mysterious shoppers who the company had mentioned, encounter, these problems at the moment of this

enquette, but the Office Quebecoer of the language French insist on the fact that these problems

that doves rest secret, so, don't want divulged in what these problems that consisted, let's on,

the Gazette has made a demand of access to the information, it's all right in course, in the case, it's always

pending. What's the trying to like that? Is it Anguie really, really,

really, really, it's really, it's a few, it's a few weeks, that the

song, in my car, the three accords, can't a resurgence, and it's

a phenomenon that we've often, arrive with the old songs, it's arrived with

the old songs Quebec-based, and especially as American in general, it's like we can't observe that suddenly there's a movement algorithmicic that's that's created that

a song is ported to the avant, you know, at the last time that there were more than 1,700 videos that had been made on the

song in my core, the three accords, even the three accords, who have said on their count TikTok,

who remerced the people who have made the video that's, and I tried to see, how it's

to come it's, because these these espies of virality they're tough to generate, they're tough

to find out of October 2025 when a person had published a meme or is that you know, you know,

you know, five things that five things that a lot of you, second, it's I'm proud of you,

and the third time, you know just the video clip in my car, all the everyone

would be listening that, and that and that's like the song original

of a a lot in fact a great part of the videos that are

in the few people we're in popular, especially at the young, you know,

like the people in the parties in the parties of associations students,

in the manifestations syndical of ambulances, it's the videos that have the

videos that on the video that and in fact, I'm talking of that,

because again one way, it's not an affair of discoverability the

the song, in my carboy frengant, is I'm going to do you do you know, like all the

other songs in the world, it's a thing of a thing, you know, you know,

there's in the other people, people, they're like, is what, they're like, they're

doing, do you do you do you do you do you do you know, like it's like, it

was like, it was a thing, you're like, there's like, really a disconnection cultural

between this generation and, like, plenty of the culture of the culture Quebecos.

And they'll, they're They're going to Go on our site and it's sure that's there's a spike in their stream that's

there's a spike in their vent of billet so it's just just for it's just to make a engagement

like universal and inevitable it's he can be there are there things that make in a

life and a link affective and a link viral with a product with a product cultural Quebecoa

so it's just like really to be to be a song And it's like, it's it's so to be able to

be able to be able to be able to the scale because at the level you know, you can't quite

see it's phenomena to take to the amount and like to say it all the majority of the

aspect of a general of a general of a idea. I'm going to the minister

of the war, so we have applied in the last year that the Pentagon

had annuled the deal of 200 million with anthropic, entropique that is the model

AI Clode because the company refused to accorded to the Army American an utilization without restriction of these models of intelligence artificial. We mention more

particularly two guardrails, guard de fu in French, or in any case in the words of OpenEye, we're often

of red lines or line rouge. The two ring rouge is impish the

surveillance of mass of the people, and impish the this is my

traduction, but the tues of the world without supervision human.

So I have a kind of of a type of auto-a generated by IA. In the full of this brie of

contract with Anthropics, well, OpenEye, the rival has signed a contract with the Department

of War. The way I've heard of a post Instagram, I think that I

see Open Eye on Instagram and it's an espos verbue with plenty of slides

that was the 28 February, the day when we were demanager and

he precise that he precise that Open and I, they also, care for the two guardrails, the guard of food, that I've mentioned. Or agreement with the Department of War. So, he talks, finally, the contract that they've been to signer.

And the legend, we've said, well, we think that our accord or the contract that we've been to signer, that we've got to guardrails, the guard of food, that all accord precedent, concerning the deployments DIA, Classed Secret,

so classified, all that has a rapport with of the things that the citizen ordinary would never know, he's including the

contract anthropopic were or would not signer in a series of slides that sometimes it'd be on

a bit, I think, in the fact that someone who's not familiar with the

lingua of the company Open AI or of the intelligence artificial that we

don't not very what is mentioned or what we've like like the

mechanisms of security. So Open A. He's made to explain that, in the fond, one no , all the , all the

, like, anthropic, not the surveillance of mass of the citizens of American, not the

tuesue of the automatic who are in supervision human. They go even to copy

paste, these extracts of the contract that would say, to us

also, they have the heart on their hand, and they they're

their lines, their red lines. We're should be the like, like, anthropic, they're not to sign it,

because they make in place these two lines these two lines and then, then all of a whole of course, they're doing to say that they're

also they're all the same , they're doing in the form of the formulation of the phrases, for permit, that finally, the two lines rouge are trespass,

that we, that we've, that we, we, that we franches, but in having

not like to not the make it, so I'm going to do a example, it's the system

DIA not used to be being in independent, these arms autonomous, in the

case where the legislation, the regulation, or the policy of the

ministry, the of the war, exige a control human.

What is what is going to do the case that the legislation exige

not the control human. Everything is in-geue by a bit of

that I'm in-acquered in-acor conforming on the law applicable. So, we can't

get to this bit of law applicable, we're on we're on the law to the

case, you, it's a lawful use of our systems. But, just, the government

is in measure to determine what is lawful or not, if we're open- sign a contract

that's a contract that permits all the company pretent evicted. It's technically legal. If we're

talking to, by example, the surveillance of mass of the citizens of American, there's a

good article in Doverge that I put in the notes of Hayden Field who said that finally

the Ministry American of the war or the defense, it depends how you it's able to

be able to be able to be able to make the operations of national, it's

if it's all right legally if he want to support the work of an agency civil, like at the

administration can also invoction there's all there's all the P. Also the P. F.S.

the community of technology of the state department with a firm of AI, the NSA, the CIA,

the FBI. But there are all sorts of sort of tour of pass-pace that can find

in sort that finally, that that we want to avoid or that

avoid their permise legally. What is interesting, let's say, let's say in a tweet dated of 27 that that the value cardinal of his company, open and I, it's the responsibility

human, of the usage of the force, and that, it englob just the machines automatic of two-reel. It's a way to make in

moe something that would be sonning these cloches. Because what we do, it's not, no, we don't, we don't, deploy these systems of

to do you're automatic without supervision human, we don't not that. What we say, is that he will have a responsibility human, and

that can very very well not in ammonde the tury, but after the jury. It would be to be someone

for responsible after having, I don't, I, you know, I'm, you're just a 150 ecollier in

an school. And then after that, there are all sorts of way to reject this responsibility that,

even legally, that are contained in the law in the States U. In other case, you're something interesting

also in the famous term guard wheels, guard of food that is often used by the companies of intelligence

artificial, which is part of the discourse media in this moment, or the synonymes

that I mentioned red lines, link rouge, or even the term safeguards in

English. So, a guard of French, it's on the auto route, the space of cloture parapet that we can't prevent the border,

the focce, to prevent the chute of the auto, but it can be also, I think, a guard of foe, it can be on a point or something

of the kind of to get to the chute. And in the podcast that I listen to time, that's really

on the idea that's the idea, this machine kills, he said that the parlay of

guard rails, it's immediately a drapeau rouge. In fact, he said, and I transcribes because I thought that

dron, but when someone says guard rails, you should reach for your gun. So, they say, in this moment, there's a debor, which is like mis in sign, even, in the media, to know who

would be in charge to determine what are the guardrails, the guard of food? Is it in amon a company like anthropic, who says, hey,

no, I, I don't, I sign not of contract because I have two lines red, or is the government who determine what the

Lines Ruge? Is it the Minister of the War, in the States Units, so, this debate, that, it is oriented. That's the side of Entropic or of Open Aisle. In making in sort that it's that the questions

that we're posed, it's like if we're embobined, because we evite to talk, by example, of questions that are much more fundamental.

It's like it is inevitable that eventually there will have some system of systematized. We presuppes that's an inevitability

and, So it's not part of the conversation. Is that these systems of auto-touch

automatic that would exist? Is that we're going to they're doing,

they're not, it's not part of the debate public, it's not part

of the conversation. The systems AI, is we should they're

used to one for to make the surveillance of mass

or for do autonomous kill chains, like these

chains, It's interesting because they They're doing They're doing these They're all Compagy of technology of information It's just like

centralize all the government That's like It's quite evident that's that they're That's what they They're

And even the Autonomous Kill Chains, it exists We've been at Gaza, notably with the system

Lavender that is used by Israel so that generes and that gener plus of civil

than the army is capable to abatt it's able so much it's generate so much

civil. In the full of all that, we say it's anthropic that's a fris

a fucking good figure. There's a movement of mass for cancel JATGPT. There's

a adjustment I saw yet that backtrack on certain of these positions. Oh, finally,

effectively, it's maybe it's a rush a little designated like that with Department

of War, maybe we'd come back on certain formulation or like detail

in the contract. There even, I've found that I think it's emblematic, I think

it's a figure emblematic Katie Perry who tweeted a capture an capture of that was

she had had to have bought an abodement annual pro to Claude with her

caption, it's written and she had made that you put it is a figure what?

Amblematic the espate the I'd say embrace of like

the capitalism and also of the recis mediatic that these

these enterprises that want to gobe and I think I don't know if I'm charned

on the case but I'm quite a figure interesting, especially because she's from the from the

since I'm exactly, I can't I'm not can't be to check it's on I'm in

I've seen in New York in New York so that soodagh so suddenly considerate like the

company and AI who would be humanist blah blah but at the contrary it's just

really a good coup of marketing for you know, you know, you know, you know, it's a

initialalalment it's been founded by the ancient of Open and I because Open and I

had been the end all the value that, you Annaise that's a non-profit Yeah, it's a non-profit

Yeah, it's been a new direction, there's a lot of there, there, there, people have

opened anthropic. Anthropic, and the, the guy at the head of that, Dario Amode. He is not necessarily counter the fact

of doing machines of automatic. It's just that he, his discourse, it's not just the time

yet. It's not still the moment. The technology is not sufficiently viable in

this moment today for to kill of human without supervision. But eventually yes,

it will, and it will. And it's like several dood in this

ecosystem that of the Silicon Valley, he publish these think piece,

they're they're going to make to their their philosophy to do

that about to the technology and their recent essay he has

published that he has published it called the adolescence of

technology the The Adolace of Technology and if

we study his discourse he will really frame

Claod like a entity, a person, but more particularly a ado. In these words, and even the chant cemented you use, it's like in this moment, he's trained, he

educ. Claude has encore before business parental. You know, these times, you could say, he's not mature, he fume the pot, he does he don't, he doesn't, you know, all the cliches that we could attach to the adolescence are like

convoced, and there's a rotech familial or parental that is used, and I think it's kind of interesting, that's the term and the imagery that we mobilize.

In fact, I thought that the imaginary that was a little like if we were like some people that you know,

that's we had a time, you know, we've done to get an good education our but what if

we need to do it to do that the next Columbine, the next the next tyrearch

cynic alleyato that goes in an school and that on any

who we're we're not, we're not we're not we're not we're not we're a good

soldier, we're just a violence quote and quote that's similar, that's me mean

in my last parenthase but I listen also a podcast to time

that I like I'm a podcast and then we talk on the technology

but I say more of a point of view philosophic I heard

one of their episode and it's not an episode which is recent. In other, I think that it's been

enregistrated, you know, there's a couple of months. But it's so good that I wanted to try to know what it's

going to be the book. But the episode is called Hot House to Evidence and we talk of forensic

architecture with Julia Neumo guitar. There are several intervenants in the podcast,

but at the beginning of the Aides of the ICE so, so he had like

one of the media, there like a few a few a few

a and how these raid it seemed it's, it's, it's,

it's, it's made to a way a bit libidinal, you know, in using the

force brute, where we just subemned down the people who have a color

of a color of more fosos who are racized finally and then

we're even just who have an accent exactly and it just to it

was it automatically it's etiquette like, okay, yes, it's potentially a symbol. And the guy

met this in parallel with all the discourse on the technology for the technology so-d-d-d-point who are able or who would

serve would now to identify these sibble with a grand precision. And he said, how it's that I've got

this discourse that on the great precision that is permise because of technology of technology of point,

but in the fact, what I see, what I in the media or, you know, what's that's

what's a lot of it's, it's, it's, on the simple he's

completely sloppy. He's in fact, that their technology military, it's not

consue to deploy to deploy some , let's , let's , some,

it's, it's specific. It's we're, we're really in the discourse,

and in the analysis the language, it's it's been for explain after-cue, why

we have used why we've used these resources, why we've deployed in first place? So it's like

if we said that the technology military, their usage principal, its function principal,

it was an fact that it was a question of a recit. We have used this system, by example,

I'll give an example of Lavender, the system that will siblet the potential the

sible that would say lily to be able to be able to get to get a lot of people

of people in a way of course we've used to the system and then the system creates

some kind of the system that creates cellular that people had had with the members

of the amos so so across these contacts cellular we can

suppose that tell person had a had a It's if it's a fadda, blah, blah, blah. It's justifying, to justify, finally, the murder of mass incensed, and free. It's what we're doing, I mean, at Gaza, but it's now that we're doing more and more to the United, just in the context of the raid of ice.

We're going to renter the population. By example, at Gaza, it's like, we're not the population on a scale of 1 to 100, by rapport to your chance to you, to be member of the Amos. So, for example, I could be, I don't know, I'll qualify, of 25% there's no. There's no. It's like if the presumption of innocence she was never accorded in this kind of system that.

At the time when you're identified as a potential danger, it's justified the fact that we've got abatted. In this context, the I, it's not useful for identifying these symbols,

but, there, he knows, for abess or for, he says, lowering the threshold, for plausible deniability, the seignee the deni plausible plausible. Now, I don't know if there's just a jurist who us listen or whatever, but the denies plausible, I think that it's like a concept

that is, certainly applicable to the United where we're saying the possibility to nigh it in Wikipedia, but in the rights American, I don't know if there's like an equivalent to Canada or in Quebec. It allows to individuals, by example, in the army, to nigh, to know the existence of action

condonable, commised by other, in an same organization, or in an responsible, if we can't prove their

participation, if we're not like the, it's a, it's a pre-reve, or even if, yes, they

have been personally implicated, and they've voluntarily ignorate, ignorates, in a

context of an non- non- un-liberate, in the case, there's a question,

I'm, I'm would be me contact to be me explain the thing.

I really liked this podcast, this episode in particular, and we explain also that all the thing is

that's a report with the data, like, military data, civic data, it's like

a mass of the data, but that's terrible, like, which is not necessarily

just, just, definitely, just, and so, the regime of big data,

and of its new technicity generative, so the fact, we can generate,

like, automatically by example, des we're not capable of necessarily more work with these bad news that. That it makes it to

render the error acceptable in construising an intention after-court. In the context of ICE, we've seen a lot of politicians, justly, liberals,

even of the Democrats who pleaded for oh, the problem with ICE is they're not not quite trained, they have been more of formation

or they have need to more of more of the camera corporal while like,

of one, all the mord that we're doing, you, it was filmed by

15 point of view of passant, but not so, but also their

proper camera or their proper cell to them, the eyes, so it's

not more of the camera that we have done, it's made to the

way, the solution, the camera carporal for the police, the guy

said, in the podcast, then there the more there angle at

the practice justificative for fabricing a precision artificial

can be used so the terrain if you go actually

on the terrain it's the but you all you can fabricing

a brief that I think that I think when we talk of the

use military of the AI because it's that's that

that's that in the deal open AI Department of War

or or another anthropic department of war we

We use, in fact, principally for outsource the processus decisional. So, for not to not have to bring

decisions. But what we do is that we're doing the processus of destruction. Just to just to be

also that all the language, in the justification, in the case, the AI,

it's being deployed by example in Israel, we say that it aid in a way

discursive to a a state genocider, like Israel, to maintain his position of power. It's not a story of, you know, there's even a documentary, I think, it's an inundi, Mercii, and it's and it passed at Telekebec on the IA,

like, well, there's systems of intelligence artificial that would beaise, and, like, by rapport to the data that are used to use for their entrainment. And it's not to know if a system of intelligence artificial is biased or no.

It's to understand that, this system, that, before all, it's a narrative device. So it's

an out of a tool that is made to the position of the power. And it's a example, the act of

murder, like something something that's something that's something and what is automatic and what is

automatic in the cyblage in these species machine of human

is the creation of a narrative. Thank you, Daphne, so I'm going to pass to my segment. We've heard of the week of course that

Netflix had not been able to get to buy. The people were happy, but after they've heard that it's not a member

in the font that's the studio, as it's many, in fact, all these properties of television,

these property intellectual in the world of the comic book, the games video, their chain

of television. We're to understand that Warner Bros. is not just, just the studio of cinema, but it's also these chains like HBO or like CNN. And there, in fact, Paramount, who is detained by the family

Ellison, the family Ellison, who is a family a little of different magnate of different industries, but it's the old money American, who is strongly aligned with the administration Trump.

It's a bit for that, in fact, that they've had this transaction, contrary to Netflix, who had one of his members of his consular administrative that had overtly critiqued Donald Trump

there a couple few weeks, that had been addressed by by Trump in saying that it would nuir to their chance

to have the transaction. So just I'll just for a little call David Ellison who is one of the fortune Ellison who is he who is the empire

mediatique of the family, so Don Paramount and the He's the He pointed at the CBS News

the journalist American, Barry Weiss who had had been the first mandate to render

the content of CBS News a little more aligned with the administration Trump and with

the interests of the government Israelian and they're they're to acquire

CNN. It's not not so far instantaneously but CNN will surely virate

a bit in mode of Fox News progressively that that many people

think people cring. I don't know how it's turning the the village of CNN, who had already started, after the victory of Donald Trump, to, like, to make an espouse of

a discourse that was, ah, yes, what we've seen of mal, what's what the problem, and he had started to put place to the voice Republican

on the zone of CNN, the people who defend overtly Donald Trump who are there because, you know, it's a parquet of

view, it's a their lesson, the last the last the last when it's

when it's a 2016, we'd say that the victory of Donald Trump had made more

double-down CNN to be like the media anti-Trump the media that's made up

that's like you're like if fast-forward, 2026, 10 years, the CNN is like,

no, no, in the what's what's what you do? it's adapted

our line editorial for player to play to more than more to the country that's

with the money to the money by Paramount a lot. Many people were stressed in fact

of the purchase of Applemount by Netflix because he had at the sort of

cell of film Netflix that had who had engaged to continue

to distribute to distribute these films to it would for some

periods reduced and then it would be on the platform and it's interesting because when you look at the

state of streaming in the States there are quite many there are Picoc, Netflix, HBO Max,

Prime, Ulu, Disney Plus you know, we're on really a lot of people, it's really that's idea

of this idea of people are like, we're going to want to want to have all

the where there all the content available in streaming and not necessarily this model that

that would have to be able to the industry mediatty Quebec. This also would be practical but it's

not dependably of that the benefit of the evolution of our industry cultural. I think we

arrive at a moment where there there's there's a lot of a group community

people want to do you know they want to do you want to do if Netflix

bought a Warner but I mean like that per amount, you know

we're It's all right. He will have now, in the way of there's five major, he will have

four major, and it's also Disney that's the plus the money to doxoffus Disney

that has the property, and then it's all over the players of the equation. I think

that really this business that of the group conglomerate mediatic is in

trying to be too, it's by the space of manufacturing of

studio independent, like I had a 24 and Niant the studios

that it's like it's that's just a job independently, but who have an immense backing financial. We're often like, okay, Trump, he's outreages, blah, blah, blah, but, you know, it's like, really with,

how he organized the FCC of the United, which is the equivalent of CRTC, it's really Donald Trump who decides that he can have a right of veto, because he, he made, he appointed

the chair of FCC, and if, for that these transactions, pass in the world of the audiovisual, you know, like, the audiovisual legacy, in the phone, all the, all the,

that's a rapport to the zone of television, to zone of the chain of television generalists.

It's a bit not necessarily the same the same card regulatory distribution to Canada,

but it's a little where's that all that is really monitored by

the agency government so if Paramount want to Warner

but for a transaction for this Cep that, it's the Mace

Vos, that will come done his his let's pass

and it It's like, like, the interest in fact for this transaction, it's the interest for the control of the discourse. And in fact, I think that's the interest of Donald Trump specifically for changing CNN, who had been his more enemy, let's say, in the media mainstream, from his career political. So, there, there, is that, is, is I, I think that,

I don't, I think, Parliament will decide to also like the prestige of certain property of Warner at the HBO. I don't think that the branding HBO or even the chain in as well their service of streaming will be able to be mixed with the proper service of streaming

of Paramount but I don't think not that they will lose these images of mark that who have just too capital cultural. It would be completely it would be completely a good decision

but I'm made a question, and you know, in the Quebec we're a little a little market,

but there's the same dynamic that had been in the year old, with an industry cultural or an industry of the

image mediatic or an industry media that was a velocity, it's the transaction of Belle and

Astral that I think I've already covered in Café So, so in

the year 2000, Bell, BCE, decided to buy Astral and that was one of

rare detenteer of chain of TV and the place of the place in the

exterior, say, the grand conglomeras or the society of the Astral

deten the chains like Canal Vee, like Music Plus VRACTV,

deten of the Chine's like music Max, you know, in fact, I think

that's more of a 10 of TV or ZTL, Canal Evasion, all these Chains, Canal D, all these Chains

were detained by Astra at a moment and had been bought by Bell. The CRTC has approved this transaction

that made in sort that all these chains that have been in the ecosystem of Bell who had to

be procured VTL and who had made in a lot of that has had been a homogenization of the offer of

content, and even, let's let's it, let's an offer visual, or, for a lot of these chains that in this moment, I don't, I don't not, I don't know to the chain specialised,

but to the last, new news that I've viewed, who diffuse the same publicities, who diffuse the same content, the repris, who have access

to the same property, you know, it's like, it's like, it's a space mesatique, that's more homogene,

and in, and, in Quebec, it's just really flagrant because he retricies and ceas

it's like because Belle to buy it after she BEL have made enormously of chines

of Astraal don't VRAKTV which is still a staple of the culture of the

millennial and the years who have grandies in the years of 2010

end of 90s 20s so so that's like this kind of so

kind of make homo can't is that is that that's that that's that

that's that is that that's that I don't, I think, not particularly but, in fact, it's sure that there will have some changes, especially on the

places where there's a posture editorial. The people talk of a drive-a-droid of property far, like the universe

cinematic of the comic book D.C., like an kind of changement subtle, but progressive

per state cultural in fact in these works, in the talent who are engaged,

in who who has who has the right to do you have the right to make the front. Thank you people

to have been to hear of Kaffa-Snake Thank you to the same next thank you The music

of intro and audio and of Azul A-Z-L-O Bye Bye Bye

You know,