Call Me Back - with Dan Senor - Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Episode Date: May 12, 2024At 8:00 pm tonight in Israel, the siren will sound across Israel to mark the commencement of Israel’s Memorial Day, Yom HaZikaron (Memorial Day for the Fallen Soldiers and Victims of Terrorism). Thi...s is the day that Israelis, as a nation, honor the fallen from Israel’s military and those casualties from its wars and victims of terror attacks. Since last Memorial Day, 1594 Israelis have been killed. Out of those, 834 are civilians murdered in terror attacks, 822 of them since 10/07 (this is out of a total 4,070 who have been killed from terrorism since the Jewish State was founded). We will have more to say about Israel’s Memorial Day and its Independence Day in the days ahead. As it relates to the war Israel is fighting today, this morning I spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about a number of issues, including the coming operation in Rafah, the necessity for continued IDF operations in other parts of Gaza that the IDF had previously cleared, what makes this war so different, whether the Prime Minister is thinking seriously about the ‘day after‘ in Gaza and the contours of a Day After Plan for Gaza, how the Prime Minister is approaching the hostage negotiations, and whether exile for Hamas’s leaders (including Sinwar) could be part of a final deal to get the hostages home. In this episode, passage read from “The Genius of Israel”: https://tinyurl.com/ytp43fx3 https://tinyurl.com/3sjkuczz
Transcript
Discussion (0)
There have been reports that you have considered letting Hamas's leadership go into exile in the context of a full-on hostage deal, assuming, obviously, that includes removing the threat of Hamas from Gaza.
What should we make of those reports?
Dan, this war could be over tomorrow.
If Hamas lays down its arms and surrenders, returns the hostages, the war is over.
It's up to them.
The idea of exile is there.
We can always discuss it.
But I think the most important thing is surrender.
If they lay down their arms, if they surrender, the war is over. It's 7 o'clock a.m. on Sunday, May 12th in New York City. It's 2 o'clock p.m. in Israel.
At 8 o'clock p.m. tonight in Israel, a siren will sound across Israel to mark the commencement
of Israel's Memorial Day, Yom Hazikaron in Hebrew, which is Memorial
Day for the fallen soldiers and victims of terrorism. This is the day that Israelis,
as a nation, honor the fallen from Israel's military and those casualties from its wars
and victims of terror attacks. Before we move on to today's episode, I would like to read briefly our
description of Yom Hazikah Run from our most recent book, The Genius of Israel, because the way
Israelis honor their fallen is really like nowhere else in the world. And this passage refers to the
siren that will sound tomorrow on May 13th in the morning. At exactly 11 o'clock a.m., Israel's national air raid siren system
would fill the air with a loud plaintiff note, a blaring high-pitched sound that could be heard
everywhere, as if it were coming out of the air itself. For two minutes, the world would stop,
as in a sci-fi movie. Cars would stop on the highways, their drivers standing
like sentries next to them. In restaurants and hotels, schools and offices, stadiums and homes,
everyone would stand in silence. Diners, waiters, and kitchen staff would all stand. Students and
teachers in school would stand. Foreign news outlets would post videos of street scenes frozen in time
while the jarring, inescapable wail filled the air. Two minutes was a long time to be still and
silent. It wasn't just that Israelis were doing the same thing. They were tuned to the same channel.
The channel was at once collective and personal. As Israelis focused on someone they lost,
a brother, a son, a girlfriend, a parent, a childhood friend, a teacher, a student,
a nearby shopkeeper, a soldier from their unit. Again, that was just a description that Saul and
I wrote in The Genius of Israel, but this
specific Memorial Day will be like none other for Israel.
Since Israel's last Memorial Day, 1,594 Israelis have been killed.
Out of those, 834 were civilians murdered in terror attacks. 822 of that 834 number are Israelis killed on and since
October 7th, including 531 men, 291 women, and 40 children. This number of 834 is out of a total of 4,070 who have been killed from terrorism since the Jewish state was founded.
We will have more to say about Israel's Memorial Day and its Independence Day and this moment in general in Israel's history and future in the days ahead.
But as it relates to the war Israel is fighting today, well, that is
the focus of today's episode. And this morning, I spoke with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
about a number of issues, including the coming operation in Rafah, the necessity for continued
operations in other parts of Gaza that the IDF had previously cleared, what makes this war so different,
namely the reality of hostages and the existence of a vast tunnel system, whether the prime
minister is thinking seriously about the day after in Gaza and what the contours of a day
after plan for Gaza could look like, and how the prime minister is approaching the hostage negotiations. We even
discuss whether exile for Hamas's leaders, including Yechia Sinwar, could be part of a
final deal to get the hostages home. Our conversation with Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu. This is Call Me Back.
And I'm pleased to welcome back to this podcast, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu,
who joins us from the Prime Minister's office in Jerusalem.
Good morning, good afternoon, Prime Minister.
Well, it's good to be with you. This is the eve of our Remembrance Day for our fallen soldiers and the eve of our Independence Day.
One precedes the other. We wouldn't be independent
without our fallen heroes who guaranteed our independence, our survival, and our future.
Saul Singer and I wrote about that specifically in our most recent book, where we talk about,
unlike in the United States, in the United States, there's basically a separation of a
couple of months between America's Memorial Day and America's Independence Day. In Israel, the two days are back to back. So you are about to memorialize, remember, and honor the fallen
with your Memorial Day, and then you go right into Independence Day, back to back. For those
who've never visited Israel, it's quite a unique experience to go through that transition.
Maybe just spend a moment on why that's so important, the two days being back to back. Well, if you look at the history of the Jewish people,
we, the Jewish people date back 3,500 years. That's three and a half thousand years that we
are attached to our homeland. But after about 2,000 years, that covers the biblical period and the period that followed that,
we lost our independence and we lost our state.
And we were scattered to the far corners of the world.
Yet we never forgot Jerusalem.
We never forgot the land of Israel.
We wanted to come back and restore our independence.
But we couldn't.
And in this long diaspora, we faced the horrors that no other people faced.
We were massacred, butchered, exiled, century after century,
leading to the greatest massacre of all, the Holocaust in the 20th century.
The establishment of the State of Israel after the Holocaust changed everything.
It really marked the change in the
destiny of the Jewish people because we were able to restore our capacity to defend ourselves.
This is the first and most important meaning of the state of Israel. The Jews are no longer defenseless.
They're no longer at the whim of the waves of anti-semitism that sweep the world as they do now.
We can fight back. The establishment of the state of the waves of anti-Semitism that sweep the world as they do now, we can fight back.
The establishment of the State of Israel involved the sacrifice of our brave soldiers in 1948.
That's 76 years ago. We were few against many, a handful of people, 600,000, facing five Arab armies, and we won with a secret weapon. That secret weapon was the spirit
of our people, the courage of our fighters, but also the knowledge that this is our last chance.
You can come back from the dead so many times, but this is it. So we established our independence
and built ourselves into a much more powerful nation. But that independence, that survival
was purchased at the cost of our fallen heroes.
We never forget that.
We understand that this is what separates that part of Jewish history to the current
part, where we're still being attacked.
We're still being attacked by those who want to openly declare their desire to destroy
us, Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah, but there's a difference.
Now we can defend ourselves.
And this is the meaning of this Remembrance Day,
and this is the meaning of our Independence Day
that follows it.
It was purchased with their sacrifice, with their blood.
There's a lot of territory I want to cover here
that really begins with October 7th,
but I want to talk about you really begins with October 7th, but I want to talk about
you as the son of a historian, you as someone who has studied extensively leaders throughout
history, decision makers, and just sort of ask you with that perspective what you were thinking
on October 7th. For me, from my historical perspective, I see this.
I think that the intention of these murders was the same as the Nazis.
And they openly say they would destroy any one of us.
In fact, the Hamas charter says,
seek out the Jews, if they hide behind a bush, kill them,
kill every Jew in the world.
That's their official charter, their constitution.
That's what they would have done if they could do it. The difference wasn't in intent. The difference was in capability.
And after this first horrible setback, which was held back by the courage not only of soldiers,
policemen, policewomen,
civilians, immediately we got into
fighting them back and we're in the process of destroying Hamas so we don't face that
threat from Gaza anymore. But this is part of the larger Iranian axis that threatens our
survival and Iran attacked us, as you know, a few weeks ago. And to me, the historical implication of that was that we have to be able to defend ourselves by ourselves.
We appreciate deeply the support given to us by our great ally, the United States.
We have common cause with it, although we can have our differences.
We do. And yet the most important
thing is that we must not ever lose the capacity and the will to defend ourselves by ourselves.
We don't ask for American soldiers. We don't ask for others to do that. We have to be able
to do that all the time. This is ultimately the guarantor of our survival and our security. I will say this about the United
States, which I think is very important. I think the fate of the world depends on where America
goes. I mean, in the first half of the 20th century, America was not the world leader,
and humanity and the Jewish people paid a horrible price for that in World War II and the
Holocaust. After the second half of the second century, we saw America becoming the world leader,
we saw the rise of Israel, we saw the alliance between us, and that changed everything. In the
first half of the 21st century, there is a challenge to American supremacy, a challenge from without and a challenge from within.
I think for the sake of humanity, for the sake of our common future, our common values, our civilization, it is very important that America retains its dominant position as the supreme global power.
And I think that is something that is being tested alongside this attack on Israel.
It's being tested. And it's not, I don't think it's accidental at all that the Hamas and Iran,
they chant death to Israel, but death to America, because they see the attack on Israel
as the first step on the attack on America. These crowds, mobs in American universities,
they burned the Israeli flag and they burned the American flag. They chant,
death to Israel, death to America. So we're fighting a common battle, a battle between
civilization and barbarism. And that's why we have to win. And that's why we will win.
I want to talk specifically about Hamas.
There are many despicable things one could say about Yehia Sinwar, but he's not stupid.
And one could think that he did not realistically believe that he could defeat Israel militarily.
So in real politic terms, how do you interpret Sinoir's practical objectives? Like what was he practically trying
to achieve when he architected this massacre? I understand the way you think, but that's not
necessarily the way he thinks. He's a true believer in the worst sense of the word. He
leads a cult of death, and the impulses of death and murder are so deeply ingrained that in many ways he jumped
the gun because he's part of the Iranian axis.
This was premature.
Iran would like to have us enveloped from every side.
They'd like to control all our borders, have these terrorist invasion armies ready to pounce
in a single moment on multiple fronts.
And in many ways, Sinoir jumped the gun.
That's what happened.
We are now facing seven fronts.
We have the Hamas, that's the most immediate
and most obvious front, and we will win there.
But there's also Hezbollah in the north.
There's Houthis in the south, in Yemen.
We have militias, Shiite militias, radical Shiite militias in Iraq and in Syria.
And there's Iran itself.
So I think he was just, you know, he just did something that wasn't in cahoots with a larger plan.
That is in terms of timing.
That's what I think did it. And the reason he did it is because the impulse to murder Jews is so deep that he just couldn't control himself.
Hamas has two strategic assets that have been stubbornly effective.
I hate to use the word effective, but they have been effective in shaping this war.
And those two are tunnels and hostages. I don't think any
modern military, Western military has had to fight a war with these two obstacles. How can Israel
win this war as long as Hamas has hostages and this tunnel system where their leaders and their
military command can hide underground? Well, we have several goals.
One is to destroy Hamas.
We can and we will.
The second is to release our hostages,
and we're doing them in parallel.
We've already achieved the release of half of our hostages,
and we're committed to get the other half as well.
That's by applying military pressure,
and when he senses that the pressure is too heavy,
he releases
hostages uh how do we achieve that we achieve that by in fact as you say facing overcoming a
challenge that no modern army has faced uh john spencer is in charge of uh urban warfare and
west point and he said at west point he said i can't find any parallel to that. In Mosul, there were 3,000 to 5,000 terrorists.
We're facing 35,000 Hamas terrorists.
We've killed already about 14,000, wounded many others, and we're progressing towards that goal.
In Fallujah, you didn't see it.
And in many ways, the only parallel that John Spencer could give, he says there is somewhat of a
parallel, which is the battle for Manila in World War II. Why is that parallel? First
of all, understand that what Israel has done is take the effort to minimize civilian casualties as no other army has done. We use leaflets, we use
thousands, millions of text messages, phone calls. We actually call the people, give up the benefit
of surprise, tell them, get out of the way. So get out of the war zone so that we can accomplish our
military objectives while you're in a safe place. Hamas is doing everything it can to keep them in the war zone.
We do everything to get them out of harm's way.
They do everything to keep them in harm's way, including using gunfire.
They actually shoot their own civilians trying to keep them there.
Because for them, you know, for us, every civilian casualty is a tragedy.
For them, every civilian casualty is a strategy.
So they don't give a hoot about their civilians and they're responsible for those deaths.
But nevertheless, even though we're faced with such a cynical enemy,
we've been able to keep the ratio of civilians to combatants killed.
Again, everyone is a tragedy, but it's a ratio of about one to one now.
14,000 have been killed, combatants, and probably around 16,000
civilians have been killed. That's not the ratio that you had in Fallujah or in Mosul, where the
difficulties you faced were far smaller, far smaller. And yet in the Battle of Manila in 1944
in World War II, you have something approaching a parallel.
Okay, what happened there? There you had 17,000. Manila was a city of 1.1 million.
Gaza and its environs is 2.2 million. Manila had 17,000 Japanese soldiers.
Hamas has 35,000 terrorists. And they also had And the Japanese also had two other things. They had a thousand
hostages, that is American POWs, and they also had a tunnel system. And the tunnel system was
the sewage system of Manila, which they extended with their own military tunnels. That's pretty
safe, pretty close approximation, okay, of what we have now. The result was that America won the war.
They defeated the 17,000, they killed quite a few of the 17,000, some of them
committed hara-kiri and others that gave themselves up. So you had about, I think, I
can't say 17,000 deaths but assume that. I think it's fewer. Okay. How many
civilian deaths were incurred in the battle for Manila? Do you want to guess, Dan?
I was like a hundred. It was tens of thousands.
No, you're right. A hundred thousand. A hundred thousand civilian deaths.
That's it. And we're at one to one, and here we're talking about six to one,
or even seven to one. Okay. There's an enormous difference because Israel is doing what no other army has done
in modern times.
It is going to extraordinary lengths
to enable the people to leave the combat areas,
to apply humanitarian aid,
to give them the food, the medicine,
the water that they need,
the shelter that they need to have,
because we're not going after the Palestinian
population, we're going after the Hamas terrorists that embed themselves amid these civilians and use
them as human shields. And so far Israel has achieved this gold standard of minimizing
civilian casualties, but it is held to a double standard, a triple standard, a quadruple standard
that no other army is expected to do. And basically what people are trying to do is rob us, the Jewish state,
that has been the victim of these genocidal terrorists, the ability to defend ourselves.
You cannot say that you support the right of Israel to defend itself and then condemn it
when it seeks to exercise that right. I think it's admirable that what Israel has done in trying to minimize civilian casualties,
it's been quite frustrating to me that not enough attention is paid to that.
But in terms of Israel winning the war, it has to have some ways, in addition to minimizing
civilian casualties, that's not part of winning the war, that's just the way Israel chooses to
fight its wars. But in terms of those tunnels, how do you win a war against an enemy
that can hide in this massive labyrinth
of tunnels that exists in Gaza?
We go into the tunnels.
Look, there are about 500 kilometers of tunnels,
so you don't have to blast every tunnel corridor,
but you have to go after the safe rooms that they have there, the command
and control centers that they have there, communication centers that are there,
missile production sites that are there, a whole lot of them, money that is stored there,
and that's what we're doing systematically. So we don't have to blow up all 500 kilometers,
but we blow up these crucial centers underground.
And that's why the war is taking a little longer than we would like.
It's something, indeed, that no other army, as I know it, has done.
But we're doing it.
Okay.
So let's talk about Rafah, which is obviously in the news.
A lot of attention, both in Israel and around the world, has zero it in on Rafah. The IDF has been extremely successful in
fighting in all over Gaza, but has also seen Hamas return to areas previously cleared by the IDF,
like Jabalia and Gaza City. So coming back to these, these dastardly tunnels, how can the IDF
defeat Hamas and Rafah as long as these fighters, I take your point that the IDF goes into the
tunnels where it can and where it has to, but these fighters can also move underground all
over the place. And it seems to me, based on public reports, that's how these Hamas fighters
have been able to reappear in areas that the IDF had previously cleared. This is a stage conflict.
It takes stages. The first stage is to destroy the terrorist army.
Hamas is not merely a terror organization. It has a terrorist army of 24 battalions. We've
destroyed now about 19 of the 24 for our NWFA and we'll destroy them too. But the important thing to
understand is that once you destroy these battalions, you haven't eliminated all the Hamas fighters. You know, they're still there, but they have a harder time having an
organized structure to get a thousand, an attack by a thousand Hamas terrorists against us. You can
get a few, a small number. You can get six here and 12 there. But it's very hard to organize these battalions.
Now, sometimes they congregate, as they did in the Shifa hospital. They all congregated because
they don't have a place. The previous organization that they had is gone. So they congregate in the
Shifa hospital, which is not a hospital really. It's become a Hamas command center with patients. We gave warning to the hospital manager. Not a single patient
in the second round on the Shifa hospital compound, not a single patient was killed.
In fact, no civilians were killed, but we killed several hundred terrorists,
captured another 500. And we did this with a far smaller force and with much less intense fighting because we've already
destroyed those battalions. So, stage one, destroy the battalions. Stage two, mop up.
Stage three, be able to go in and deal with any terrorist resurgence. And that's going
to be a while. That really follows the end of the war. You're not going to finish it
without having the ability after the war is finished to prevent the resurgence of terrorism. If you look at what you need to do
after this war is won, you'll have to have sustained demilitarization by Israel. I don't
see any other power that is willing to do it, but I'll be happy to see it.
But wait, Prime Minister, on that first point, is that for the foreseeable future? Is that
years from now, there will be military presence in Gaza?
Not necessarily.
IDF military presence?
It could be presence, but it could be actions inside Gaza.
That is, you have to be able to...
So meaning going in and out?
As you need.
Or if you have to be inside, you'll be inside.
You do what you have to do to prevent the remilitarization of Gaza.
In fact, we've discovered that any place that we left,
whether it's Lebanon, we got Hezbollah.
That is, Iran walked in with Hezbollah.
We left Gaza, Iran walked in with Hamas and Islamic Jihad.
We pulled out of a few cities in Judea, Samaria,
about 20 years ago, and we immediately...
So after Operation Defensive Shield.
Immediately the radicals took over.
So we had to go in back there
and we go in periodically and we...
But let's draw a line here.
That's distinctive from this idea of
there's no other solution than Israel reoccupying Gaza.
You don't have to reoccupy it.
You just have to demilitarize it actively.
And, you know, the distances are so small.
So you go in, you go out, or you remain where you have to be.
So it's about seven miles, seven miles wide and about 20, 28, 27 miles length, just for our American listeners.
So we do what we have to do.
But demilitarization, sustained demilitarization is number one, right?
After the war ends, you're still going to have to prevent any terrorist resurgence from emerging.
The second thing is you need civilian administration, which we hope to do with local Gazans who are not part of Hamas and are not committed to our destruction.
Possibly, and I would hope with the aid of Arab states and other states internationally.
I think that's important. And the third thing would
be reconstruction that does not allow the rebuilding of these terrorist infrastructures,
which including underground tunnels, which Hamas has done. That's the realistic plan right now.
People say, what are you going to do on the day after? Where's your plan? Well, the first thing
is make sure it's the day after. I mean, people ask, what are you going to do in the day after the Nazis in Germany? Well, first get rid of the
Nazis. Then you organize what you have to do. By the way, you stay there for a pretty long time
with an active military presence. But I think that's the first thing. And if you can't get,
we tried to get Gazans, local Gazans, to come in and help us distribute the food which Hamas was looting.
Israel was putting in hundreds of trucks a day and Hamas and others were looting it.
And we said, well, maybe we can get some local Gazans to distribute it.
Okay.
Well, they were shot in the back of the head.
Until, no one's going to come in until they know that you either destroyed Hamas or you're about to destroy Hamas.
And that's a certainty.
Because if they think Hamas is going to emerge from the rubble and retake Gaza, they're not going to commit suicide.
You mentioned the Arab states. the leadership of the UAE, one of the Emirati officials issued a statement saying they are not
planning to participate in any post-Gaza security or civilian administration with Israel. So, A,
what's that about and how do you respond to that? Well, I leave it to them to make their own
decisions. But I think that as soon as we eliminate Hamas, new opportunities will rise.
And by the way, I think they'll rise also
to expand the Abraham Accords
that we forged
to include other countries as well.
And you know very well that
this has been my goal for a long time
and it will continue to be.
But the post-Hamas scene
will happen when Hamas is gone.
That is not when every last Hamas fighter disappears,
but when we vanquish them, destroy their organized battalions,
and mop up the remaining places.
And that's going to take some time, but we can do it.
We're actually quite close to achieve that.
We're very close to achieving the destruction of the remaining Hamas battalions.
That's a precondition for victory. You still have to do other things. You still have to
have the post-war arrangement with those countries who want to do it and are prepared to do it.
I'm committed to that. But first, victory. There is no substitute for victory. And people try to walk around it.
You can't.
You have to be, you have to complete the job.
Victory is a necessity and it's possible.
So in terms of completing the job, there's what to do with Hamas's leadership.
And obviously that has to be weighted against a various, a range of considerations, not
the least of which is future hostage deals. There have been reports
that you have considered letting Hamas's leadership go into exile in the context of a
full-on hostage deal, assuming obviously that includes eliminating the fighting force of Hamas
and removing the threat of Hamas from Gaza. What should we make of those reports?
Dan, this war could be over tomorrow. If Hamas lays down its arms and surrenders,
returns the hostages, the war is over. That's our goal. I mean, these are our goals that I
described. It's up to them. The idea of exile is there. We can always discuss it. But I think the most important thing is surrender.
You surrender, you give up those hostages that these monsters have taken, among them young girls
that they're raping continuously. I mean, this is abominable, but this can be over tomorrow.
If they lay down their arms, if they surrender, the war is over.
Previous hostage deal. I want to spend a moment on this. One of the criticisms I hear from some listeners to this podcast, from some people in circles, my circles here in the US,
and some people, a number of folks in Israel, that you have not prioritized hostage negotiations
in terms of the near-term objectives
of what you are working on.
And I just want to give you an opportunity
to respond to that.
We hear it.
I hear it anecdotally.
It shows up in some polling that there's this perception.
That's patent nonsense.
You know, I lost a brother,
my older brother, Jonathan Yoni, who led the rescue team in Antebe to Sabina airplane that was brought to Tel Aviv by
Palestinian terrorists. I spent a good part of my adult life fighting terrorists and fighting hostage taking and I'm committed to it. I've been able to, with the help of the IDF thrust militarily, to release now over half of the hostages,
half of the hostages, and we brought them back and I'm committed to return the rest.
When people are saying that, they're saying that I refuse to accept the Hamas extremist
positions.
I've offered, after the first half, the release of the first half,
I said okay we're willing to be quite flexible to get a deal which even the the Americans said
was extremely generous and that Hamas refuses to make a deal. Why does Hamas refuse to make a deal?
Well because it says oh we'll release these hostages, It's a question mark whether they will, but we'll release them. If you get out of Gaza,
stop the war,
end the war,
leave Hamas intact
so they can retake the Gaza Strip.
And they vowed that once they retake the Gaza Strip,
they will do the October 7th massacre
over and over and over again.
It's not my words. It's theirs
So Hamas is saying if you wanted the next hostage deal
It's you have to basically lose the war and let Hamas win the war Hamas will emerge from those terror tunnels
Declare victory. It'll be a tremendous victory for them a tremendous defeat for us
It'll be a tremendous victory for Iran and the Iran terror axis, which is against you, against the United States, just as it's against
us. They just see us as standing in their way of conquering the Middle East, developing the ICBMs,
the intercontinental ballistic missiles tipped with nuclear warheads to threaten America. So
this will be a victory against, a victory of the Iran terror axis
against Israel, against the United States, against us both. That I can't accept. That's
what we haven't had to deal. But my priority in every way is to get those hostages out.
Fortunately, we also got a few through very daring military rescues that were successful, but it's very difficult.
So anyway, the charge is malicious.
It's false.
And it goes everything in my power.
I meet the hostage families.
I see their terrible anguish.
I think of those men and women and those young girls in those tunnels, in these dungeons of torture.
And I want to, I'll do everything in my power to get the rest, every one of them,
those that are alive and those, unfortunately, that are dead back in Israel.
That's my commitment.
And I'm doing everything I can to do it.
Just false.
When you did the hostage deal in November, I identify three forces that I believe from afar worked in getting that deal done. Intense
IDF military pressure, a clear message to Hamas's leadership that the United States
stood shoulder to shoulder with Israel and completely had Israel's back. And three,
the international blowback against Israel while it existed,
it was nowhere near what we're seeing today on college campuses, at the UN.
I think there's a latent affiliation with Israel that you don't see on the main news channels and
the chattering classes. I think that's definitely true of America. Consistently in the Harvard
Harris poll, 80% of Americans, when they're asked,
who do you side with in this conflict, Israel or Hamas?
80% say with Israel.
20% say Hamas.
It hasn't moved even 1% in these seven months.
But 20% identify with Hamas?
Who are you identifying with?
With these murderers, with these rapists, with these baby burners, these people who chant death
to Israel, destroy and annihilate the Jewish state. It's a sad statement. So I think that's
a that's the rot and corruption of the American in some of the American higher education institutions,
including the one I went to MIT. It's unrecognizable. But that's a matter that
America has to deal with. Now you say, well, what happens when governments are swayed by these mobs?
Yeah.
All right?
That's what you're saying.
Well, what I'm trying to understand is when the hostage deal took place in November, you had IDF military pressure.
You had America shoulder to shoulder with Israel.
And you didn't have all these crazy protests that we're seeing today. And I'm wondering now, given events of the last week, tensions,
growing tensions between the U.S. administration and Israel, we'll see how it plays out, but the
quote-unquote embargo on some military aid, how that's perceived if you are Yechia Sinwar. If
you're looking and you're negotiating with Israel and you're saying, well, wait a minute, unlike
November, the Israeli military pressure, at least now, is not what it was in November. The international blowback against
Israel is insane, I mean, at record levels. And there's questions about how much is America
standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel. And I say this, Mr. Prime Minister, there are American
citizens in those dungeons in Gaza right now. So I feel quite strongly about this because there's only one military right now that's
fighting to get those Americans out of those tunnels in Gaza.
So I worry about this perception about a breach between the United States and Israel.
Well, that perception certainly doesn't help the hostage situation, certainly doesn't help
stabilize the Middle East.
It gives a sucker to Iran and its henchmen.
But it means that we have to apply the pressure even more.
If the equation has several, you know, several elements to it, then increase the military pressure.
But ultimately, you need the victory.
It's not going to, you know, you're not going to evade the need for victory. And you ask, well, what do you do
when you're faced with such international pressure? I can say that in Israel's history,
when faced with this kind of pressure, then leaders did what they had to do. I mean, in 1948,
our first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion announced, declared the independence
of Israel even though there was very strong American opposition at the time. Secretary of
State Marshall was opposed, adamantly opposed to it, as was the State Department. In 1967 Levi
Oeschkel, who was prime minister at the, before the Six-Day War, was told by
President Johnson, by the way, he was a great friend of Israel, he said, don't do it, don't attack, don't preempt, because if you will, you'll be alone. Well, he did. We won the war. In 1981,
Menachem Begin bombed Saddam Hussein's Osirak atomic reactor, atomic plant that was going to produce nuclear bombs against Israel.
And Ronald Reagan, a great friend of Israel, slapped sanctions on us. He stopped the
provision of fighter jets for a while. You have to do it. I, myself, I went to Congress against
the impending Iran deal, which I thought was a disaster. I still think it's a disastrous deal that paved Iran's path to a nuclear arsenal with gold.
I thought that was a mistake. I had to do it.
And at the same time, you know, you ask what do you do in the face of international pressure
and even disagreements with our great ally, the United States.
You do what you have to do. Because, you know, ultimately,
people understand it. When you take these actions to defend yourself, to assure your future,
people understand it. But we have no other choice. We're not going to collapse and have a good
obituary in those newspapers in the West, including in America, that excoriate us, I'm sure they'll be very
sympathetic to the Jews as victims. But we have been victims long enough, and we will not be
victims here. We've already paid with the precious blood of 1,200 of our people who were mowed down
by these murderers. We'll do what we need to do. What would America do? Imagine that
you had 39 11s in one day. Imagine that you had 40, 50,000 Americans killed, murdered, and 10,000
held captive. Just imagine, what would the United States do? Well, it would do probably a hell of a
lot more than what we're doing. Now, admittedly, we're not the United States, but we saw what you did after the bombing
of Pearl Harbor.
And you know how many people were killed in the onslaught against Japan and Germany.
You know what happened then.
You know what you did after 9-11 and what happened in Afghanistan.
And, you know, I said, if Israel has to stand alone, I said this on Holocaust Memorial
Day here, I said 70, 80 years ago, we were absolutely defenseless. Nobody came to our aid.
Everybody sympathized, but nobody came to our aid. And I said, if Israel has to stand alone,
it will stand alone. And mind you, I deeply appreciate the support we received from the
United States and from President Biden to date. But if we have to stand alone. And mind you, I deeply appreciate the support we received from the United States
and from President Biden to date. But if we have to stand alone, we will do so because I'm the prime minister of Israel, the one and only Jewish state, and we will not go down. We will fight,
if necessary, with our fingernails, but we have a lot more than our fingernails to fight with.
And the first thing we have is the more than our fingernails to fight with.
And the first thing we have is the spirit of our people.
So I want to just end there, okay?
There's a poll out, in our one minute remaining,
there's a poll out, this JPPI poll,
that says that 33% of Jews in Israel say they are not sure whether their children
should build a future in Israel.
40% of evacuees from the north are considering not returning to their children should build a future in Israel. 40% of evacuees from the north
are considering not returning to their homes. I guess, A, why are they wrong? And B, what is
your vision? We talked about the day after for Gaza. What is your vision for the day after this
war in Israel as it relates to this conflict? Well, all the more reason to win the war.
What happens later? I think that the important thing that we understand is that the weak don't survive here.
They just don't survive.
You also don't make peace with the weak.
You make peace with the strong.
You don't make peace with the defeated.
You make peace with those who are victorious.
And that's our goal.
Israel will have to be a lot stronger.
We'll have to spend a lot more on defense spending, even though we spend quite a bit. We'll have to continue to make these
incredible weapon systems that we have, both defensive and offensive. These bullets that
shoot out intercept missiles in the sky, a bullet hitting a bullet.
I mean, amazing Israeli technologies and other things that surprise our neighbors,
our enemies, including Iran recently.
They're always surprised by our capabilities.
We'll have to continue to build that and cement the alliances within the region
and outside the region.
I hope that we have the support, continue to have the support of the broad
base of America, of the American people, as we do now, contrary to what you see on the news reports.
But I think there's another question. It's not where Israel goes. It's where does America go?
Where does America go in this world? Because if you say, oh, it doesn't matter. We can, you know, we can
disregard this. We can go against Israel, which is crazy. It's like going after against yourself.
And I was deeply moved the other day when I saw American students understand that.
There was in North Carolina, in one of the universities, this typical mob protest. They
burnt Israeli flags, American flags. they tore down, they took down
an American flag and hoisted a Palestinian flag.
I was very moved by it.
And then you saw this amazing thing,
you saw these American students who hoisted
the American flag again and then stood around
and protected the flagpole and I was so deeply moved
because I said, you're our brothers,
we're fighting the same war. So the question is, where does America go? Where does America go? Does
it succumb to this madness, to this mobocracy in those campuses, to this flagrant anti-Semitism
that is sweeping the globe? And you know, it never ends with the Jews. It starts with the Jews,
but it never ends with the Jews, this mass hatred. America stands for something
else. I believe in Israel. I believe in our future. I believe in our capacity to
shape it and to protect it. But I also have not given up on America. I think it
has great powers within it, and I hope to be proven right because that
will serve not only the purposes of Israel,
but all free societies on earth.
Prime Minister, thank you for your time today.
Thank you.
That's our show for today.
Call Me Back is produced and edited by Ilan Benatar.
Our media manager is Rebecca Strom.
Additional editing by Martin Huergo.
Until next time, I'm your host, Dan Senor.