Call Me Back - with Dan Senor - The Road to Riyadh - with Nadav Eyal
Episode Date: February 3, 2025Watch Call me Back on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CallMeBackPodcast To contact us, sign up for updates, and access transcripts, visit: https://arkmedia.org/ Dan on X: https://x.com/dansenor D...an on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/dansenor As Israelis welcome home more hostages after 15 months in Hamas captivity, we sat down with Nadav Eyal to discuss what their stories reveal about their captivity, their role in Israel’s national healing process, and the broader implications for Israeli society. We also discuss the ongoing negotiations for the next phase of hostage releases, the political stakes surrounding Netanyahu’s visit to Washington, and how these developments could shape Israel and the region. Nadav Eyal is a columnist for Yediiot. He is one of Israel’s leading journalists. Eyal has been covering Middle-Eastern and international politics for the last two decades for Israeli radio, print and television news. CREDITS: ILAN BENATAR - Producer & Editor MARTIN HUERGO - Editor REBECCA STROM - Director of Operations STAV SLAMA - Researcher  GABE SILVERSTEIN - Research Intern  YUVAL SEMO - Music Composer
Transcript
Discussion (0)
These are the three balls in the air right now, right?
Iran, normalization with Saudi Arabia and the future of Gaza.
And it's up to the Trump team for Netanyahu, Dermer, the Saudis, the UAE,
and everyone else to try and pull something off here that gets to the
second phase of the deal, gets normalization, hits Iran, you know,
just touches on all the
bases or everything can also blow up and Israel might in that condition resume the war. It's 8 o'clock a.m. on Sunday, February 2nd here in New York City.
It is 3 o'clock p.m. on Sunday, February 2nd in Israel as Israelis turn to a new week,
continue to embrace the returning hostages and learn about their experiences in captivity. After 485 days in Hamas and some of them in Palestinian Islamic Jihad captivity, 35-year-old
Yarden Bebas, 65-year-old Keith Siegel, an American Israeli, and 54-year-old Ofer Kolderon
were freed on Saturday and reunited with their loved ones or at least with some of their loved ones.
Yarden Bebas, his wife Shiri and children Ariel and Kfir were all abducted from Kibbutz-Neroz on October 7th.
The children Ariel and Kfir were four years old and ten months at the
time which means today they would be five years old and two years old and then
they were separated from their husband and father Yarden who was released
Hamas has claimed that Shiri and the two children were killed in captivity again
fear was ten months old and Ariel was 4 at the time.
Israel has not confirmed this claim but has expressed quote grave concern for their fate.
Yarden has returned home, the family said in a statement they issued, but the home remains
incomplete. On Thursday three other Israeli hostages
were released, Arbel Yehud 29 years old, Agam Berger 19 years old and Gadi Moses
80 years old, along with five citizens from Thailand who were workers in Israel.
I'm going to read their names as well and please understand that my
pronunciations will not be as clear as when I do the Israeli names. Those names are Wachara
Srarun, Pongsak Tahena, Sathyan Suwankam, Surasak Lamnao, and Banawat Sa'etho, which leads to a total of 18 hostages released
out of 38 that are to be included in the first phase.
The 33 Israelis and the 5 Thais.
Of the 735 Palestinian prisoners who are scheduled to be released from Israeli prisons during the first phase of the deal
290 have been released
Negotiations over the next phase of the agreement are planned to commence on Monday
With us to discuss what we've learned about the experiences of the hostages in captivity and their
Extraordinary courage as well as what we think to be happening behind the scenes
leading up to negotiations for the second phase of the deal is call-me-back regular
Nadav Ayal.
Nadav, good to see you.
Good to see you too, Dan.
And it was good to be with you this weekend over Shabbat, where you shared some of the
stories that we will be discussing today.
So I just want to get into it. You published a very powerful column in your paper in Yediot Achrodot
this past Friday, so leading into Shabbat, about the stories
and the fortitude of some of these hostages that we've learned of in captivity.
You opened, and I'm going to quote here, you open,
and this is just a translation to English, you opened with the line, the word heroism shrinks in shame in the face of the
returning hostages.
What did you mean by that?
Darrell Bock Dan, there's so many forms of courage, and
those who have been kept by Hamas are now giving us a gift with their stories, telling
really incredible stories of resilience and fortitude.
And what I meant by talking about how heroism shrinks
in their face is that I don't think that we expected
these kind of stories to come after more than a year
of captivity, of being held by a fundamentalist,
genocidal organization in the way that they were held.
These are people who are telling us, and this is one of the things that the abductees have
been telling since their returning, that they suffered near starvation.
They were literally telling us the story of sitting in front of one bowl of rice and counting
every rice there so it would be divided and shared between them in a fair way.
Although this situation is so dire, some of the men were held in cages at the beginning of their
captivity, only brought out of these cages in order to eat, they managed to save their inner self, their dignity in various ways.
And I think that the most heroic way was the way that they really thought about others.
So one thing is the courage of maintaining your dignity in a very difficult condition.
When you are willing to sacrifice yourself for the others in this kind of a
condition after being held for so many months and you're willing to share your food and
to encourage other people who are there in captivity and to be willing to confront the
Hamas terrorists there, willing to sacrifice yourself for others after a year in which
they have been doing everything to make you less than a human, this is truly heroic.
And I think that this is a gift that the Israeli society and the Jewish community around the
world, the diaspora, is receiving from the hostages returning,
and it is so meaningful for the process of healing within the Israeli society.
Can you, Nidav, tell us a couple of these stories?
You're alluding to them, but I actually want to get specific.
So tell us what we know about Arbel Yehud and her captivity.
So Arbel Yehud was taken from near Oz
and she was taken together with her spouse
that still held captive.
And she was held alone for almost all of her captivity.
And that's the most difficult thing.
I can talk about forms of torture,
about the captors beating up,
at least at the beginning, specifically the hostages,
torturing Amitzos.
Now we're going to speak about that.
But for Arbel Yahud to be held alone, no one to speak to in Hebrew, no one to support her,
and to maintain herself during this time of captivity, it's going to be a long way ahead
for her.
And she knew, the people who came from
near Oz sort of understood what happened in your Oz. I should remind the people listening that one
in every four Kibbutz members was either murdered or taken hostage. The community was devastated.
The IDF never came. This is one of the places in which the IDF never fought in Neroz.
So I've been to Neroz twice now and three times actually. What you're describing this, I hope our
audience takes a moment to process this. One out of every four members of the kibbutz, as Nadav just
said, were murdered or taken hostage in the Cheder O'Hel, which is the dining hall of the kibbutz, they have set
up, you know, seats for everyone where they would eat meals because they eat as a community
and you see every seating of the person's name who's either dead or taken hostage.
So you just see how it touches one way or the other virtually every family, either directly
or indirectly.
And this is the world that Arbel comes
from now or will be returning to. And this is going to be terribly difficult
but for near-os this release is so important of the hostages right now. This
phase of the deal is so important because they're starting to see their
community members, those who were still held captive, returning. And for them, for
instance, one of the founders of the kibbutz,
the generation of the founders is Gadi Moses,
who's 80 years old.
And I think many of the people listening down
probably saw this phenomenal photo,
really to an extent so symbolic of Gadi Moses alone,
walking through the Hamas terrorists upon his release, looking at them,
I don't want to say almost with a grin, but it was almost with a grin, a self-certainty
of himself, of what he is, walking tall there.
An eight-year-old man held captive more than 400 days he didn't see the
first time he saw our Beliyahut from his kibbutz was that when they were joined
by the Hamas captors just before the release and that's the first time that
they knew that that they're alive so it's a tribe right that lives in the
kibbutz and not only in the kibbutz. And he was held in a
tiny room of two on two meter square meters. I don't know how to translate
this into feet then. It's about 20 square feet. And he knew the sizes of the floor
tiles and he used to walk in that room about four miles a day just to keep
shape. And this was one decision he made. Another miles a day just to keep shape.
And this was one decision he made.
Another decision he made was to keep a diary and they allowed him.
Just to be clear, he would do the equivalent of four miles, meaning going around over and
over and he would calculate it to equal to about four miles a day.
Yeah.
And he would write a diary that the capturers took from him just before the release,
and we can only imagine why. And it was very important for him. And you see this in the first
words that he's saying to his family when he's released, I'm free and I'm normal. So one of the
things that he was fearing is that this would damage him psychologically.
This is a man who has devoted his life to agriculture and he kept on doing math problems
and geometry problems and sort of keeping his brain in shape so he'll be able to return
back home. And by the way, during this captivity, he told the
captors that one day he'll return and he'll teach them agriculture. So this is
just an incredible story of fortitude and it's so important for this community
because many of its founding fathers and mothers were murdered during the attack or murdered during their
time of captivity, unfortunately. We still don't know. We're still waiting for other people from
New York to return. Now, there are, of course, Dan, the stories of people who offered the Hamas
captors to remain in captivity and allow other people to be released first.
I was immediately reminded by John McCain's story
after his plane was shot in Vietnam.
And that story, and correct me if I'm wrong,
because I'm not American
and you probably know the details better than I do,
maybe you tell the details then.
He was shot down and he was taken into a captivity which
wound up being about five years and he was given the opportunity I think at
least once to be released and he according to the protocol the US
military protocol if you were captured and you were your those in captivity
with you are able to be released or given the opportunity to release,
you are released in the order in which you were captured.
And he was given the opportunity to bypass that
because his father was a very senior officer
in the US military and he,
cause they knew who he was,
they knew he was the son of Admiral McCain
and he declined it.
He said, no, I will leave in the order
in which I was captured.
And by the way, he was not only in captivity,
he was also in really, really bad shape
and suffered permanent physical damage as a result.
So this kind of story is what we know now
is very reminiscent of what happened
with Emily Damari, for instance.
So Emily Damari was taken again from near Oz.
She lost two fingers during the October 7 attack.
Like shot, like they were, she was shot, she was shut off.
She was shut off and she also apparently has a bullet
in her leg too, apparently, or a bullet wound.
And right before the release, they're telling her,
the Hamas people are telling her,
you're gonna go back home.
And she knows that Keith Siegel, whose you know, her father is
best friends or family is best friend with Keith Siegel. And
Keith Siegel is over 60. And Emily DeMari, after 450 days,
more than 450 days goes, you should release him first. And
I'm willing to stay. And I'm asking you to stay in captivity and Keith should go first and you know what can you say about that
even sort of discussing this with the Hamas fighters these are people I need
to explain this you can't even move to your right hand side or your left hand
side while sitting without getting a permission first. They denied them the right to cry. They said
they would punish them for crying. So this wasn't only a
story about willing to sacrifice yourself, which is a story of
Emily Damari, but not only of Emily Damari. It's also a story
about managing to an extent to manipulate your captures, to develop a relationship with them.
And the most famous story in that regard is the story that Amit Susna told Uvda in Channel 12, Ilana Dayan.
So Amit Susna was released during the first deal and she was made famous by her heroic battle on
the road to Gaza.
One woman fighting three, four, five, I don't remember how many men, trying to physically
drag her through the dusty and bloody fields of Neroz back to Gaza.
And she's fighting and they're, you know, they're beating her up on the way to Gaza and she's fighting and they're you know they're beating her up on the way to Gaza and Amit who's a civilian was taken into Gaza and the
Hamas operatives there were certain that she's intelligence that she's high
ranking in the army and they were torturing her they basically they took
a stick a long stick and they connected her with their hands and with her legs and
Held her in a position and then the terrorists tells her you're either gonna tell us the truth
Or I'm gonna come back here and I'm gonna kill you
to this room in five minutes and he pulls out his gun and the spotters the IDF spottersters, one of them is Liri Albag, were there.
And Liri manages to somehow convince the capturers and Liri tells Amitsusna before she does that,
look, it looks really bad for you. I'm going to do my best. And she takes her final words from her,
according to that interview with Ilana
Dayan.
Her final words, because she doesn't know if this is going to succeed and Amit told
her immediately, I don't know if he would have shot me, but you just saved my life.
For me, you saved my life.
And when explaining how Liri managed to do this, this is a kid, these spotters, they were tasked with a mission.
When you say spotter, you mean this was their job in the IDF, which was they were in the surveillance role, they were not in combat roles.
Yeah, but they were in the field in a base near the border. And it's a job with a lot of responsibility, because you need to use technology. if you're missing something there's
gonna be a terror attack in one of those keyboard scene so just imagine they went
through you know the basic training of the IDF and then they went through the
training of the intelligence spotters and then almost immediately they fell
captive after seeing their friends murdered in front of their eyes
in the most terrible and gruesome ways and they were taken into Gaza.
And even then, to find these levels of resourcefulness in front of the terrorists and Leary says,
Amit, in her interview, Leary was a force to reckon with.
And she, by the way, one of the things that she did is,
at a certain point, they wanted to take her underground,
to the tunnels. And Leary stood in front of the group and basically said to the
captors, we're not going to go underground.
We're not going underground. We're not going to go into the tunnels.
And they actually didn't. So look, these are only parts of the stories.
And what we're hearing right now are the encouraging and the inspirational stories of captivity.
But there's so many of those stories.
And Leary, as a EF soldier, and I expect her to be formally commended for this, also suggested
to stay in captivity
so that one of her friends could go first.
And she was refused.
So when you just sum this up together,
the picture that you're seeing is of people
who suffered immensely, really.
They think about just the trauma of being taken captive
and the way that they've been taken captive,
about the bodies that they've seen on the way. Ofer Calderon tells his kids that are with him,
that were released in the first aid, when they're running from the house, they're running
from the safe room, he's telling his kids, don't look right and left because he doesn't
want them to see the bodies.
And they're running and they're hiding in a bush and the terrorists see them through the bush.
Then next thing we see one of his kids and it's one of the most powerful and terrible images of October 7.
Just an Israeli kid with his head held down, taken by the Hamas terrorists.
And this kid is saying, I saw my dad and the last time I saw him, he was on the road
and they were beating him up.
That's the last image that he had of his dad
before Offer returned back home to his family.
And when Offer sees he comes into the hospital
and he sees that his friends are standing
at the entrance of the hospital, standing at the entrance of the hospital,
just on the road of the hospital,
he makes the ambulance stops and he goes out of the ambulance
to talk with his friends, and there's a ceremony with this.
And the ceremony that started, you know, and ceremonies are really important for this,
they are on the chopper, right?
So the idea of taking them in a chopper from the Gaza Strip to the hospitals,
it's either
Teller-Schomer, usually Teller-Schomer, but Ichilov-Bellinson.
And on the chopper, they can talk, but they can write something.
So some of them wrote, at the beginning, thank you to President Trump.
And Steve Witkoff showed that to the president.
And it was in English.
It's very important that they did that, as you know, Dan.
It's very important for the commitment of the president for this deal. Some of them were just
saying, thank you, Am Yisrael, thank you, the people of Israel, we want to thank you. And
Agamberger, who comes from an observance family, said, when I fell in captivity, I went the way of faith and I am returning with the
way of faith.
So it's both a personal message, it's a national message, and this is exactly the process of
healing that the Israeli society needs in order to start turning the page on October 7, and it will never be complete until
all these hostages are back home.
Then I just want to add, I told a lot of stories here about the hostages and the hostage families,
and I want to source them.
They are sourced to reports in the Israeli press and family members, close family members of these hostages
telling these stories.
But very rarely have we heard from the hostages themselves, and journalists have not interviewed
the hostages themselves.
So I need to sort of give this disclaimer, and I want to be clear that as to accuracy
of the stories, we will know only
when the people themselves decide to talk, if they decide to talk directly to the public.
Nadev, I want to move to phase two of the ceasefire deal, which is the according to
the deal on day 16, which is Monday, they're supposed to commence negotiations for phase
two.
So when this episode will be dropping,
negotiations over that phase are at least scheduled
to begin, and obviously with Prime Minister Netanyahu's
arrival in DC this week, presumably that'll be a big focus
of his visit.
There was a lot of doubt being speculated about
around the question of whether or not the second phase would actually be implemented. As you know there was resistance within the
Netanyahu coalition against ever going to phase two. So what can you tell
us about what's going on here in terms of the beginning of phase two
negotiations? So Netanyahu is in DC this week and there are basically three balls
in the air. All of them are major issues for the Middle East and the Middle East future.
One is Israel desiring an understanding with the United States as to
tackling the Iranian nuclear issue.
There is a window of opportunity here in which Hezbollah is weakened.
The Iranians don't have their air defenses,
it's possible Israel wants to get this done together with the US alone, needing
the assistance of the US, coordinating with the US. This is the number one
strategic aim of Israel right now to try and tackle the Iranian nuclear program.
And the Israelis believe that they can do it if needs be.
They can do it alone, but they need the assistance of the American administration
in both certain types of ammunition and other assistance and coordinating mainly
the response afterwards if the Iranians are going to respond towards Israel and also making
sure that Iran doesn't use possible Israeli strike in order to break for a bomb later.
So this needs to be really very tightly coordinated with the US.
A second issue is the normalization with Saudi Arabia, And that's very much on the table.
Ron Dermer, who's the close associate
of the prime minister, actually, you know,
the acting strategic mind of the prime minister
has been working extremely hard to try and reach
some sort of a draft that will reconcile
between the Saudi demands for Palestinian
statehood and so does the Israeli statements that they don't see any
Palestinian state being formed in the near future considering October 7 and
Israel's security worries. I don't know if there's a real breakthrough there but
what I can tell you is that Steve
Woodcoff is all over this. This is his brief now. He was in Riyadh. He's focused on negotiating
with Saudi Arabia. He postponed his travel to Jerusalem the week before the last week,
calling Jerusalem saying, we have some good news coming from Riyadh or from Jeddah.
And what we're seeing here is possibly a breakthrough. Prime Minister Netanyahu,
before boarding the plane on his way to D.C., his words to the Israeli media are,
I hope we can expand the circle of peace in the region. This is the take-home message that he's sending the Israeli public
just before boarding the plane on his way to D.C. That's terribly important that he's basically
raising expectations towards a breakthrough with Saudi Arabia. And of course, the third issue is
the rebuilding of Gaza and making sure that Hamas doesn't control Gaza anymore.
I'm saying making sure that Hamas doesn't control Gaza because it is the position of the president,
it is the position of the entire administration, the Secretary of State, the U.S. National Security
Advisor that you had on your show here, Mike Waltz, saying the same things, that Hamas cannot rule the Gaza
ship.
And the Israelis are saying, and they can bluff too, they can't be like Hezbollah has
been in Lebanon.
They're not going to control a bureaucrat government behind the scenes.
In other words, we want them out, physically out of the strip.
The entire Hamas leadership needs to be expelled. And we have here ideas that have been floated by the president of a mass immigration of Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Jordan, Egypt.
And you have the president doubling down on that idea after it was rejected formally by Egypt and Jordan, doubling down, saying, they're going to do
it.
We're doing a lot of things for them.
They're going to do it.
So I don't know if that's going to happen.
But then even to take it off the table, like they've done with annexation and the Abraham
Accord, just to take this off the table and to present this as an achievement of the Saudi
Kingdom on the way to normalization,
that's also a possibility.
So one of the major elements when
you have this kind of negotiations in the Middle
East is your wins are not only what the other side is doing,
but also what the other side decides not
to do as a result of a possible agreement.
For instance, on the
road to the Abraham Accords, the Israeli government was talking about annexing
parts of the West Bank. Then came the agreements with Bahrain and the UAE and
one of the credits that the UAE took was that the Israelis decided that they're not going to go through annexation
because it was either annexation or having a historic peace agreement in the Middle East
and Netanyahu decided against it.
By the way, he decided against it because he was ordered by Trump that basically said
it's off the table.
So you don't really have two options there, but you have one option.
But for the UAE, it was an opportunity to say,
look, we managed to shut down the Israeli extremists
that want an annexing.
I mean, one could argue, yes,
it was shut down by Trump or his team.
On the other hand, Netanyahu may have played with it.
Well, he accelerated the normalization process
by potentially creating a stick rather than just a carrot.
It's possible.
Meaning creating a negative outcome
that it would be avoided if they produced a positive outcome.
But whatever, that's...
Yeah, that's possible, but his supporters
in the Israeli media were literally, literally dancing
in the streets of Washington, DC on that trip,
believing after being briefed that annexation, and this came from the prime minister's office,
annexation is just a fact of life.
At any rate, the result was great.
As far as I'm concerned, there were, you know, and as far as President Trump is concerned,
and also as far as the prime minister is concerned, there are, you know, peace agreements with
the Abrahamic courts, and there is no annexation in the West Bank.
And the same equation then can also happen here because Israel is talking about resuming
the war.
Hey, we managed to get the Israelis not to resume the war.
The Israelis are talking and the Americans are talking about, you know, a wide population displacement of Palestinians.
Well, we managed to take this off the table, we'll say the Saudis. So everything is related to Gaza.
Just to be clear, so President Trump starts saying, you know, we're gonna have to remove
a lot of Palestinians from Gaza. I don't think it was clear whether or not it was temporary or permanent, but maybe they go to Jordan,
maybe they go to Egypt.
And this topic, it's an interesting question.
Why the 60% of Jordan is a Palestinian population?
Why can't they take more Palestinians?
Obviously, Gaza used to be under occupation by Egypt,
so it's not like Egypt hasn't had control of Palestinians before.
And how did we get into this situation where Egypt, you know, the world treats Egypt like
it's doing Israel a favor by maintaining the Egypt-Israel peace treaty, and it's really
Israel's job to figure out how to make sure the Gaza-Egypt border is secure.
And suddenly there's a question like, hey, Egypt, you have a question like, hey Egypt, you have some responsibility here too.
Jordan, you have some responsibility here too.
We're not gonna get into the merits of this debate.
It's obviously a much bigger conversation.
But it is this classic, you know,
Trump just sort of raises these questions
and everyone's heads explode.
And suddenly King Abdullah and President Sisi
are calling Marco Rubio and saying,
what is going on, what does he mean?
And then they kind of quiet things down
and then Trump says it again a second day.
So suddenly it gets oxygen. And then I think what you're saying is it gets elevated, it gets oxygen, and then it's considered a win when it's pulled back.
I have to tell that the only way to understand this, because it's the Middle East and it is through the famous joke, the shtetl joke of the goat.
So a guy comes to his Rabbi and he says, my house is too small.
So the Rabbi says, so bring a goat into the house and the goat is going to live with you
in the next two weeks.
And after two weeks, the guy comes to his Rabbi and says, the goat has been leaving
us for two weeks and it's terrible, you know?
And then the rabbi says, yeah, now take out the goat.
You'll feel much better.
So this is an Israeli expression,
which usually you don't have Israeli expressions
coming from the shtetl, which is bringing the goat in
and bringing the goat out.
So the goat here is both resuming maybe the war in Gaza,
although this is not really
a goat, this is a real thing. And massive population displacement of Palestinians from
Gaza to Jordan and Egypt, something that nobody knows. It's like Greenland. Nobody knows how
this is even legally possible to do, but President Trump wants it. So then the Saudis can play this hand
as achievements on the way to peace.
Now, how will this boil down?
Nobody knows exactly,
but these are the three balls in the air right now, right?
Iran, normalization with Saudi Arabia,
and Gaza and the future of Gaza.
And it's up to the Trump team, for Netanyahu,
Dermer, the Saudis, the UAE, and everyone else
to try and pull something off here
that gets to the second phase of the deal,
gets normalization, hits Iran, just touches on all the bases
that you need to do.
Or everything can also blow up.
And I should say this, that this can all just collapse and Israel might
in that condition resume the war.
By the way, I was with someone, I won't say his name, but I was with a member of the Biden team on Friday, who was involved in everything Israel related on
behalf of the Biden National Security Team since October
7th.
And he felt that Saudi normalization, it is much warmer than people appreciate.
There's a real opportunity here if Trump and Witkoff and Netanyahu and the coalition, I
mean, there's so many moving pieces here.
It's interesting, by the way, that Witkoff, the Biden people, and this Biden person made
this observation to me, that the Biden people would Witkoff, the Biden people, and this Biden person made this
observation to me, that the Biden people would never meet with some of the more extreme members
of Netanyahu's coalition directly. They would never meet with, say, Becela Smoltrich because
he was considered quasi-sanctioned, if you will, by the US government, by the Biden administration.
And there Witkoff was meeting with Smoltrich, and then Dermer arranged a meeting as well
with Koff and Aryeh Derry,
another senior member of the coalition.
And so suddenly, so Witkoff is in it
with these members who are considered
like persona non grata, like you just couldn't.
They understand something critical
that Netanyahu is trying to explain to them.
Netanyahu is trying to explain to the Trump administration
something critical, which I
think they get.
And here's the thing.
Let's say I agree to go to a phase two and to normalization with Saudi Arabia, but I
don't have a government.
So you're not going to get a phase two and you're not going to get normalization with
Saudi Arabia.
So I need to bring over the far right with me.
So it's not only my problem.
What does it mean when Witkoff meets Smotrich?
What does Smotrich want?
And the answer is that I think that there is another ball in the
air that they're going to use.
I think it is somewhat plausible that the Trump administration, and I am
speculating, but it's based on, you
know, my best sources speculating with me, that the Trump administration will allow possible
annexation of some of the settlement blocks in the West Bank, in Judea and Samaria, that
were already recognized as part, in the final agreement, final status agreement recognized as part in the final agreement,
final status agreement as part of Israel.
And they were recognized by the Bush letter
towards the roadmap more than 20 years ago.
So George W. Bush's administration had written this,
what they call a side letter to the Sharon government, right?
This was to Ariel Sharon.
And what was the context?
Why did they write the side letter to what?
The disengagement. Disengagement, right. Disengagement from Gaza in 2005. In the lead
up to disengagement, it was agreed between the Sharon government and the Bush administration,
the George W. Bush administration, that there would be this side letter that would be basically
a commitment of U.S. policy that was intended to transcend changes administration that said what?
I don't have the letter in front of me but basically I'm paraphrasing it said
that in every final status agreement between Israel and the Palestinians
it's the understanding that these settlement blocks will remain parts of
Israel and this was the first tacit acknowledgement that Israel is
not going to evacuate Gush Etzion, that by the way existed before 1948 there and was occupied by the
Jordanians as a Jewish settlement before 1948. Meaning it was a Jewish settlement in Jordanian
occupied West Bank before 1948,
which was run by the British.
And then when the Jordanians were there
from 1948 to 1967, what happened to that settlement?
They, of course, they kicked everyone out.
Right, but the Jews had presence there
before the founding of the state.
Before 1948, yeah.
And this is the first place that Israelis returned to
after 1967, but it's not only
Gush Etzion, which is one block.
Another block is Ariel, whereas there is an Israeli city called Ariel, and there are a
few settlements around it, and Maale Adumim, which is not far from Jerusalem.
And if you take all these three places that I just mentioned, the majority, the total majority of settlers in the
West Bank or Judea and Samaria are really living in these areas. So annexing just these areas is
basically stating the obvious. During the Taba negotiations, the negotiations between the
Eid Barak government and during the negotiations between the Omer
government and the Palestinians, the basic principle there was that the Palestinians
will get every inch that they lost quote unquote in 1967. We can argue they didn't exactly lose it,
it was Jordan. Let's not go into that. But the settlement blocks will remain and Israel will compensate
the Palestinians with more territory, by the way, near Gaza because Gaza is so heavily
populated.
But again, the distinct trademark of negotiations in the last 25 years then is that these settlement
blocks are not going to be evacuated.
So if this is the case, I could very well argue to the Trump administration, hey, give
the Israeli hard right this annexation of areas that everybody knows that Israel is
not going to evacuate anyway.
And Israel has in the past acknowledged that it will need to compensate the Palestinians if there would be a Palestinian state.
And this is going to be a major win for Smotrich and Ben-Greer and the rest.
And if this can, you know, install the road to normalization with Saudi Arabia.
This is one option being speculated about.
I think it's on the table, But many other elements are on the table.
And one thing is for sure, Gaza is the key.
Gaza is the most problematic issue between the three,
including the strike on Iran.
Gaza involves a local population.
It involves trying to see a future there.
Other countries in the region region like Jordan and Egypt,
and of course, society that has been radicalized.
And I should say that outcomes are really dire, and the trajectory is usually pessimistic as to societies that have been radicalized.
Look at what happened to the U.S. in Afghanistan, for instance.
Usually change stems from within
and not from international agreements, right?
So we don't know yet how this is gonna develop,
but we are seeing that the prime minister's people
is basically trying to signal
that the second phase of the deal might not happen.
And they're doing this in various ways.
One way is to say, we don't know about the second phase of the deal, but we are all
for extending the first phase of the deal so that hostages will keep on being released
and we will give more Palestinian prisoners and we'll just remain in the
first phase of the deal.
Now they know that this is a no-go.
This is a no-go for Hamas at this point
because Hamas understands that they're losing their cards
as the deal goes through.
And they know that the entire point of the deal
was to go to a kind of end of the war phase
and that Hamas is looking for this.
So this is one way of signaling to the
Israeli public there might not be a second phase of the deal. And another element is by making
demands and the demands itself are understandable. Israel's positions towards the second phase of the
deal are quite well known. I'm just going to say them in short, Dan. Israel demands that Gaza will be demilitarized.
And it demands that the leadership of Hamas,
and by leadership I also mean thousands
of people of Hamas fighters, will
be expelled from the Gaza Strip.
This is, for the Israelis, the bare minimum.
And there would be a different regime or rule in the Gaza Strip that isn't Hamas,
and that it won't be fabricated,
that it won't be a manipulation of sorts,
and Hamas will control this behind the scenes.
This is the Israeli demand towards phase two.
I don't think that it got any headlines across the seas,
but this is the Israeli demand.
The demand itself is very understandable,
but thinking that Hamas, after having this scenes of their, for them, their victory in the Gaza Strip, agreeing to these demands, getting on board ships and leaving the Gaza Strip like Yasser
Arfa did in 1982 from Beirut, nobody in the region thinks
that this is very viable.
If the Trump administration can deliver this,
together of course with Israel,
that's gonna be a major shift and win in the region.
It will be a historic moment to see that,
but most people I speak with don't think
that it's realist to expect that it will happen right now
Do you think that's in Yahoo's government?
And we talked about how nothing Yahoo and Dermar now have their working hand and glove with Witkoff working the internal politics of
Netanyahu's government
Which is new you're painting a picture in which Netanyahu could possibly hold everything together
Do you think there's also a possibility that Netanyahu's government could just simply not survive
the next phase of the deal?
Or are you saying that the US support for an attack,
a possible Israeli attack on Iran,
could be what holds this government together
through phase two?
I think that the Netanyahu government
might not survive this.
And I think this entire thing can explode.
And I can absolutely see how.
For instance, if the president says
you go through phase two of the deal and that's it and
during this phase two
Then we discuss Saudi Arabia and the rest but we need to go through phase two because the Saudis will say
you know phase two is a deal breaker for us and the White House will buy into that argument and
is a deal breaker for us and the White House will buy into that argument. And then it's very possible that we'll see a direct confrontation between Israel and
the US.
I absolutely do not think that Netanyahu is willing to commit to a realist timeline for
Palestinian statehood.
And as far as I know, Dan,
this is what the Saudis have been demanding.
I don't know about the great strides
that Ron Dermott has been making in negotiating with them.
And if the Saudis are moving towards,
you know, away from the position of we need a date
for the Palestinian state,
I think you and I were in the same room when we heard the Saudi official
say
How serious the Saudis are was less than a year ago that they actually mean business that?
They they want to see this state not like in a decade
This is not a George W Bush roadmap or in the Camp David Egypt Israel treaty negotiations
where they Begin ultimately got Carter and Sadat to agree to
basically a path towards
Palestinian self
Government and they had like a five-year time horizon where they would work on this and let's also remember
Airy it was very airy and it didn't happen. Vague, it was vague. And
Sadat, the president of Egypt, got murdered. He was assassinated by the Muslim Brotherhood. And the
reason I'm raising this is because there were quotes of Muhammad bin Salman, MBS, talking about
the risk to his life as a result of this possible agreement with Israel. And usually when leaders start talking about risks
to their lives, it's a sign that they're gonna be
very vigilant at the agreement.
So this is very complex and somewhere here
in this triangle of Saudi Arabia, Israel and the United
States, there needs to be a real breakthrough.
And also remember that the Saudis are much better placed today in Washington
with the Republican administration than they were with Democrats.
And remember what you know better than me, Dan, that there is a problem in procuring the votes
to have the two-thirds majority you need in order to pass the sort of defense pact
that the Saudi kingdom wants in return to normalization with Israel.
And above everything I just said, there is only one person, one man
who can somehow make this happen.
And this is with no doubt Donald J.
Trump, because Trump wants to see a historic peace agreement in the region,
because this is part of his legacy, because he was dead set on this in 2016,
because he will receive, I think, and should receive, the Nobel Peace Prize
if he gets this through with Gaza.
And I would say, you know, I don't want to be too stingy about this,
but definitely more entitled to it than Barack Obama who got it in 2017 or 2018 or something.
No, no, no, Barack Obama got it in 2009.
2009, sorry, sorry.
Without doing anything.
I just remember a year after.
Yeah.
He hadn't done a thing.
If the president is dead set on getting the Nobel Peace Prize,
and we know that this is something that's discussed in the White House.
This is important, right?
Symbols are important.
Your name is important.
And I say this to the credit, as long as it works for us Israelis,
and the people in the region, in the Middle East, this is great.
So I think that if Trump is going to employ the full force of the United States
in the region, then we can see wonders happening in that sense.
But it does also entail a lot of policymaking and politics
and diplomacy of the highest level.
It's not going to just happen, specifically Gaza,
specifically solving the issue of Gaza.
And if the result would be that Bibi will allow a bluff
in Gaza, a bluff in the sense that Hamas will continue
to control Gaza and will bring an agreement
with Saudi Arabia, that will make him a center-left
politician in Israel.
And that might endanger his position in the short term
as prime minister.
I'll just say, and we can wrap here,
just when you say any normalization will need votes,
democratic votes in the Senate, just to put a fine point
explaining on underlining what you mean here,
the Saudis, yes, it's normalization with Israel.
What this would also be, and which is even more paramount,
is a closer defense cooperation relationship
with the United States, which
it only wants from what I understand in the form of a formal treaty because only a formal
treaty can survive changes in US administration.
It doesn't want to have a deal with the Trump administration and then some other administration
comes in and then policy changes.
They want a formal treaty and the only way you get a formal treaty is it be ratified
by the Senate.
And in order to be ratified by the Senate,
you need 67 votes, which there are only 53,
there are 53 Republicans, so you need at least a dozen,
you probably need close to 15 for Kush and sake,
Democratic votes in the Senate.
And to your point, Nadav, if this ultimately ends
with Donald Trump getting the Nobel Peace Prize,
as important
as this would be to all Americans of both parties, including Democrats, effectively
expanding the Abraham Accords, bringing the most important Arab country in the Middle
East into normalization and getting some kind of resolution in Gaza, as important as that would be for the United States,
for US interests and US policy objectives,
if it ends with Donald Trump in Norway, in Oslo,
getting the Nobel Peace Prize,
that may be too much for them to stomach,
giving him that kind of win in a legacy.
And so, and by the way, there may be some Republicans,
to be fair, who are uneasy with major defense commitments, the deepening defense commitments in the Middle
East. So there's a lot of complexity here. But if it ends with Donald Trump having a
major diplomatic win as part of his legacy, how that reality translates into 67 votes
in the United States Senate is not easy to see from here to there. But there's something
going on right now. And it's definitely real real and I think it obviously bears close monitoring and I think we'll
learn a little more about all of this in these days ahead during the
Netanyahu visit to Washington. Yeah and I want to say just one last thing about
because you mentioned the word real and I want to say something because we spoke
about high diplomacy now but we began with the hostages. What's really very real is that even if this phase goes through to the end, and I
hope it does, this phase of the hostage deal, we still have dozens of Israelis
alive and probably some dead held by Hamas, many of whom are the young Israeli men and the soldiers taken.
The families are waiting, and the families know that they're not going to be released in this phase.
And one of the things I think that we learned in these weeks after they returned is how could anyone not see
how essential it is for the Israeli society
that these hostages return?
And this is for me beyond any sort of breakthrough,
this is essential for the Israeli society.
And by the way, as far as I know
and what I'm hearing from the White House,
the president and the White House understand that,
and they are very
committed as far as I'm hearing from the hostage families. They are in direct
contact with them. They are committed to getting them all back home and I think
this is very meaningful and again I'm crediting this administration for
reigniting this effort and these moments of hope in Israel are very much
You know to the credit of this administration and the ultimatum made by President Trump
Giving a sense of urgency to all of the science really a great testament to how
Policy can make a difference in people lives and save lives for these people released. It was like a miracle. It was unbelievable
save lives for these people released it was like a miracle. It was unbelievable.
Nadeav, we will leave it there. Thank you as always. And I'm sure we'll be in touch, certainly offline, but as the events of the next few days play out. But we'll see you back
on this podcast too soon. Thanks very much.
That's our show for today. You can head to our website, arkmedia.org.
That's A-R-K, arkmedia.org, to sign up for updates, get in touch with us, access our
transcripts, all of which have been hyperlinked to resources that we hope will enrich your
understanding of the topics covered in the episodes on this podcast.
Call Me Back is produced and edited by Alain Benatar.
Additional editing by Martin Huérgo.
Rebecca Strom is our operations director, researched by Stav Slama and Gabe Silverstein, and our
music was composed by Yuval Semo.
Until next time, I'm your host, Dan Sinor.