Candace - Becoming Brigitte: Gaslighting The Public | Ep 1

Episode Date: February 4, 2025

Episode one of Becoming Brigitte. Good Ranchers Get $25 off + FREE Meat with promo code CANDACE at https://www.goodranchers.com. If you want my exclusive box visit https://www.goodranchers.com/Candace Candace Official Website: https://candaceowens.com Candace Merch: https://shop.candaceowens.com Candace on Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/Pp5VZiLXbq Candace on Spotify: https://t.co/16pMuADXuT Candace on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RealCandaceO Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

No Frills delivers. Get groceries delivered to your door from No Frills with PC Express. Shop online and get $15 in PC Optimum points on your first five orders. Shop now at nofrills.ca. All right, guys. So we delayed the second installment of the Becoming Brigitte series because after announcing that we were going to air the episode on our CandaceOwens.com website, we underwent extensive DDoS attacks all weekend. Essentially, our servers were being overwhelmed. Then yesterday evening, we received a second strongly worded letter from the Élysée Palace, from Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron. This time, it's a very brief letter, which we are going to show you in its entirety later on in the show.

What can we say other than the Macrones sure are not behaving like a couple who have absolutely nothing to hide. So let's figure out why they are behaving the way that they are. Welcome back to our Becoming Brigitte series. So a lot of people were wondering with the first installment, the entry to this series, why are the French people allowing this to happen? How could they allow all of these things to happen? And you're probably wondering how on earth Brigitte and Emmanuel Macron have pulled this off, essentially this mass suppression of the press that none of us were even aware of all of this weird stuff happening in their country. How is it that Emmanuel Macron, who was virtually unknown to the public a year before he came into power, managed to scuttle the campaign of Francois Fillon, the man who was a shoo-in essentially for the presidency?

How did he do all this? Well, for English speakers, it's a bit like the rise of Barack Obama. Sure, yes, Barack Obama was a senator, and he therefore was involved in politics to some degree, but his ascension into the presidency did sort of, in many ways, come out of nowhere, except Barack Obama was not married to someone who was more than two decades older than him. Emmanuel Macron, just to be very clear, and I will say this again and again, was just 14 years old when he appeared in a school play at his school called La Providence. Brigitte at that time was a teacher at the same school who ran a theater workshop., in fact, 39 years old at this time and allegedly married with

three children. One of her children, Lawrence, was the same age and therefore in school with Emmanuel Macron, okay? So, the story goes that she saw him perform in a play and she was just swept away, eventually unwilling to resist her feelings for the much younger prince. So much so that she eventually divorced her husband. She broke up her family because of this. Of course, this is objectively a very creepy story. So how on earth did they sell it to the French public? That's where we need to begin here. The answer, of course, as always, is through a very intense propaganda campaign that is filled with lies and severe intentional misrepresentation. As Xavier Poussard, that is the journalist that broke this incredible story, puts in his forthcoming book, across all media, television, radio, and the internet.

Books praising Brigitte and Emmanuel and glossy magazine covers saturated the public space. The aim was to subliminally instill in the minds a storytelling designed by the cream of the Parisian specialists of public image. This pulpy narrative told the story of Emmanuel Macron, a precocious and virtuoso student at Lycée La Providence in Amiens. The press compared him to Mozart, who won over his teacher Brigitte, a dynamic, beautiful, and charismatic woman, end quote. So yeah, they sold this as a story of triumph over conformity, right? This age-defying love, perhaps, as we now know, an early nod to the written works of Macron's favorite author, André Guide, who, as we mentioned in a previous episode,

was a self-admitted pederast, raped Muslim boys, and he wrote about this openly. And despite this, he would wind up, or at least his book would wind up, in Emmanuel Macron's first presidential portrait. Incredibly creepy. On the 14th of April 2016, when Paris Match, the magazine, devoted its first cover to Brigitte, the readers were told that one day in her heart, everything secretly changes. She attends Milan Kundera's play entitled Jacques et son matre, in which one of the ninth

graders, Emmanuel Macron, is the hero. He's already got his eagle eye, they write. Oh yes, he's already got his eagle eye kind of honing in on Brigitte. That's what we're told. Here's, by the way, a little video of Emmanuel Macron performing when he was younger in a play. You can just take a look at this. We can let this run. What makes men so scared? The drinking of a dog. The shadow of a man. Wonderful, wonderful. Irresistible for an almost 40-year-old woman

who then had him join her theater workshop in the next school year. Now, we should pause here to consider how terrifying it is that the media as an entity has this kind of power to romanticize acts of sheer evil and then to gaslight and bully those who recognize it to be so. Those of us who say, no, there's something very wrong with this picture. Anyways, no less than 60 newspaper covers were dedicated to Brigitte within a period of just 26 months. Paris Match alone thus far to date has dedicated 13 covers to Brigitte. Now, I would refer to that as sort of a psychological strategy of oversaturation, right? If you give the public so much information, whether it's true or false, it becomes immediately implausible to the average person that there might be something hidden, right? Because you're like, well, there's so much information, it becomes sort of the media bystander effect. If so many people are covering the story, then the story must be

covered. It's already covered. There's nothing left for us to learn. So I'm going to now tell you the official legend that was established about Brigitte Macron in these early days by the media. It is as follows. First and foremost, they told the public that the age gap between them was that he was 17, an outright lie, and that Brigitte at the time was 36, also an outright lie. Now let's go through the timeline of Brigitte's prior life, which was asserted by this same media, okay? They tell us that in 1953, on April 13th, 1953, ironically the same date that the MKUltra program came into existence, Brigitte Trogno, maiden name Trogno, was born in Amiens. She was the youngest

daughter of a family of confectioners who prospered in northern France. Then they tell us that after a strict Catholic education with the Sacred Heart Sisters in 1974, when she was 21 years old, she married a man named André-Louise Osier, becoming then Brigitte Osier, married to a bank executive. Following in her husband's footsteps, Brigitte Osier began a career as a press officer at the Chamber of Commerce in Lille. And then they went on to have three children. One, firstborn, Sebastian, in 1975, a son. Then they had Lawrence, a daughter. That's the one that was the same age as Emmanuel Macron and attended school with him. They had her allegedly in 1977. And then came Tiffin. Tiffin, you will come to recognize, is really the only one of the children that speaks

out and defends Brigitte Macron, which is quite interesting. They had her, allegedly, in 1984. And then the story goes that after becoming this press officer and working there at the Chamber of Commerce, she decided to switch to teaching at some point in the mid-1980s, first in Strasbourg as a literature teacher at the Lucy Berger Protestant College, then, of course, at La Providence, the Jesuit college back in her native Amiens, because her and Emmanuel Macron are from the same place. So in 1991, she went back there. And of course, while she was there, she fell head over heels in love with the brilliant student Emmanuel Macron. Now, this entire story was being painted absent any pictures, right? And so as the press was selling this, they tried to get readers to imagine that Brigitte was

just irresistibly sexy and hot, right? Like she was this sort of 1980s pinup doll, just unbelievably like a Claudia Schiffer type. This was the image they were trying to paint in their head. Like she's older now, but if you had seen her when Emmanuel Macron saw her, she was like a pinup and she was wearing short skirts. They talked about how she used to wear skirts and how all the boys were just drooling over her. All of these boys who happened to be going through puberty at the school, fantasizing about this hot Claudia Schiffer-type teacher. And, of course, the brilliant virtuoso Emmanuel Macron

and her then began this sort of clandestine affair. Years later, in 2006, recognizing that she was hopelessly in love with Emmanuel Macron, she made a huge decision to break up her family by divorcing her husband, André-Louis, the banker, and marrying her former student, Emmanuel Macron, just a year later in 2007. Okay. Again, that's the legend that was established by the media. Now, to control the public image of Brigitte, the couple brought in, well, a woman known as Michelle Marchand.

She goes by Mimi for short. That's the woman I'm showing you right here on the left-hand side, walking next to Brigitte. And she is known as the pope of celebrity press, the pope-ess of the celebrity press. You do not cross Mimi. I'm talking about this all week pr firms people that they're at the top she will break you down if she needs to you can see all

sorts of trials she's been involved in she has been accused of using tactics of blackmail and coercion we'll get into that in a little bit and her task was to essentially flood the public with these hyper selected photos of the wannabe presidential couple looking airbrushed and fabulous. You know, just sell this idea that nothing weird happened in the past. And so Mimi was able to enjoy essentially near exclusivity on Brigitte's image through her photo agency, which is known as Best Image, you will find as you get deeper in the series, you yourself are going to fall down this hole and you're going to start looking for photos and trying to verify things about Brigitte's past. And you're going to see in the corner that a lot of these photos say Best Image. Yes, that is Mimi Marchand's photo image business. It means Mimi was in control of this image. Now, as far as the conversations that were being had

between Mimi and Brigitte, there was one person acting as an intermediary. And that person's name is Xavier Niel. He is a billionaire, you should know, one of the wealthiest men in France. And I should mention that he is also the son-in-law of Bernard Arnault, the CEO and the chairman of LVMH. Yes, that LVMH,

Louis Vuitton, Moet, and Hennessy. In January of last year, Bernard Arnault overtook Elon Musk to become the richest man in the world. Bernard Arnault's children, two of them, were actually taught by Brigitte in school. And you should know, two of his children were taught by Brigitte in school. Later, Brigitte developed a close relationship with Arnault's eldest daughter, who she didn't teach, Delphine, who would go on to become Brigitte's clothing provider through, obviously, Louis Vuitton's artistic director and stylist, okay? Just to follow that, Bernardo Henault has a daughter, and she gets involved in styling and dressing Brigitte Macron, the first lady, and she does this, obviously, through Louis Vuitton and taps their artistic director to be the stylist. That artistic director's name is Nicolas Ghesquière. Now, why am I telling you about that? Who cares what Brigitte is wearing? Well, you should just know as another fun fact

that this man is the main promoter of transgenderism and androgyny in the fashion world. He's huge, okay? Not only has he been, and this is directly according to Out Magazine, deliberately hiring trans models and choosing them to open for Louis Vuitton's fashion show, like when he picked a 23-year-old transgendered individual named Crow Kian to open for their 2018 show in which they premiered their spring-summer collection. um but guess guess kier also has taken it upon himself to launch the careers of a ton of transgender models all throughout the fashion industry like one person named teddy keen levon was thanked uh nicholas profusely who at the age of 23 became a household name after being discovered by nicholas guess kier um at the age of 21 he was discovered by the age of 23 he was thanking him uh and so this is just the person that's dressing Brigitte I digress so what okay Brigitte's stylist specializes in

transgenderism in the fashion world as a creative director for LVMH coincidence you could say right fine okay the point here is also to demonstrate the kind of power that surrounds Brigitte because when we consider how it might be plausible for a story this big to have been intentionally covered up by the mainstream media, yeah, well, it's kind of important to know who is the surrounding cast and how powerful these people could be. The other point is that Xavier Neal, going back to him, that's Bernard Arnault's son-in-law,

who was the go-between between the wannabe presidential couple and Mimi Marchand, our Pope press lady, Xavier and Neil, Xavier, Neil, and Mimi met through a shared lawyer because both of them have a bit of a checkered past, okay? Xavier, in the 1980s, helped develop a chat service that was dedicated to cyber sex and it became incredibly lucrative for him and then he became part owner of a chain of peep shows and one of them was later found to be a front for a prostitution ring and in 2004 he was arrested on charges of aggravated pimping i should be clear here that those charges were later dismissed. But I do also here want to quote Xavier Poussard's book.

He says this, a lot has been written about Xavier Neal, the father of the free box and the two-euro cell phone subscription plan. Essentially, this is like, just to make it clear for English listeners, it's almost like Verizon bundle. This is how he became extraordinarily wealthy. Today, he is a full member of the global hyperclass connected to all the Silicon Valley big shots and propelled by Henry Kravis to the board of directors of the powerful American investment fund, KKR. However, the role of its storage service, DL Free, in hosting child pornography is still too little unknown. And Free has even been described by the Canadian Center for Child Protective Services as the largest source of child sexual abuse images. Okay. Now, you can go down that line. You can look up what the Canadian Child for Child Protection Project Arachnid is and why they started going after this, and that's connections to Xavier Neal, but that's not what we're here to talk about. I'm here to tell you

about how he met Mimi Marchand through a shared lawyer because she was serving time, Mimi Marchand, after being accused of various things. She had racked up a string of suspended prison sentences in the 1980s and spent two years behind bars awaiting trial over her involvement with her gangster boyfriend, who is identified in her biography as Hafid, even though eventually she was not convicted. And then eventually Xavier Neal gave her money to save Best Image. Then in 1998, she was handed another three-year suspended sentence over another former boyfriend and a whole drug dealing operation. And through that, Xavier helped her out financially, of course, in 2024, when he saved her photo agency again, Best Image. and in turn, for him having saved Best Image or helped her out,

I am sure that she looks after the images of him and his associates in the public, okay? So just how central was this woman, Mimi, in creating this image of Brigitte to the public, okay? This woman who is known to be a little bit of a gangster behind the scenes. Like I said, you can look into her yourself, Mimi Marchand. In fact, I think the New York Times just did a takedown piece of her and all of her involvement. Well, just over a year after Macron was inaugurated the president of France, Mimi had this picture of herself taken in the presidential office,

making a V for victory sign with her hands. Yeah, because they were indeed victorious in having fooled the public about Brigitte. That's what I would imagine that's all about. But then something really interesting happened, okay? Very interesting happened. Brigitte and Emmanuel, shortly after that photo was taken, made the decision to sort of carefully pull away from Mimi Marchand, their PR fixer woman, because she was involved in another scandal. And you guys, I'm telling you, it just seems to be a lot of oopsies around this couple. It's weird, okay? So Mimi also shares another friend with Brigitte. They have a mutual friend in a billionaire that is named Marc Ladry de Lacharier.

Okay. Marc is so close to Brigitte, to be very clear, so close to Brigitte Macron, and he enjoys being photographed out with Brigitte Macron, so close that they decided to attend the production of a show together, a show called Starmania. And you're going, wow,

why do I remember Candace talking about Starmania on the last episode? Oh, because that was the show that they attended together that was produced by Thomas Jolly, where Brigitte then handpicked Thomas Jolly to do the Olympics. So Mark LeDry was with her, okay,

at that premiere when they were like, this is the right guy to throw on these Olympics, or the Olympic show, which had, obviously, transgendered individuals or drag queens that were strutting. There was a lot going on that offends my Christian senses, and I would call it satanic. Anyways, you're probably wondering why Mimi's mutual friend with Brigitte caused a problem for the presidential couple in which suddenly they said, we've got to back away from Mimi. Well, Mark, that guy Mark LeDry, another billionaire,

happens to have a really troubled son named Jeremy. And shortly after Mimi took that picture in the presidential office, it was revealed that Mimi did her friend Mark a solid by keeping Jeremy's name and his face out of the press because she runs the press. She's like a press gangster, so to speak. Jeremy, his son, was the former manager of a children's entertainment company who was twice convicted, once in 2008 and once in 2015.

And you're never going to guess what it was for. Child pornography cases. And then again, beyond this time and recently, in 2004 and 24, the mother of his children summoned police to their place in Marrakesh out of fear after she went through his computer. And they have very young children. The ages at that time were three and one, I believe, after discovering even more images on his computers. Investigators collected 4,000 images of children on his computer, naked children that were being raped. For that, he has, by the way, gotten another slap on the wrist. What I was able to determine online, and again, obviously French is not my first language,

is that he's been sentenced to just eight months for that, and that that sentence has been suspended, meaning it won't happen until down the line that's the last i could find on it i'm happy to correct that if that information is wrong so that's three child pornography convictions for mark and mimi helped cover up the one in 2015 and and so anyways covering up jeremy's tracks and that conviction was a bad look for the newly presidential couple and so they began to pull away from her but But Mimi's kind of one of these people we were talking about yesterday, these PR agents that you just don't cross. OK. And she didn't like that. She didn't like that people were starting to say that she was became even more clear that she was persona non grata in the presidential inner circle. And she was no longer invited to attend the Thursday meetings at the Elysee. And so what does a PR person do when they feel burned?

You know, they drop a bomb in the press. And it looks like she indeed dropped a bomb, an explosion in the press about Brigitte Macron in the magazine called Closer. OK. Brigitte had somehow been spotted at the entrance to the American hospital in Paris, reportedly for undergoing cosmetic surgery under general anesthesia. And the first lady was furious about this publication. She publicly condemned Closer magazine for her favorite invasion of privacy. Understandable if you're at the hospital getting some work done. Her reaction, though, seemed like an overreaction, especially to journalist Xavier Poussard, it just struck him as odd because a year earlier, another magazine called The Express had similarly outed her for going under the knife

with a doctor named Dr. Sidney Ohana. And yet she didn't care. She didn't face any, that doctor and The Express did not face any public condemnation. Brigitte was not mad at them. So Xavier's going, what particularly about this publication and Closer made her freak out, made her go so far as to set for the first time a precedent in which the first lady came out and publicly condemned the press? So he began pouring over that article in Closer, trying to understand what did I miss? What did I miss? What's in here that set her off? And he found it. You see, while Closer had not named the surgeon,

they didn't at all name the surgeon who worked on Brigitte, they did this sort of petty thing where they left a massive undeniable clue as to who the surgeon was. In the magazine, they described the surgeon as a quote, eminent and media savvy plastic surgeon who would keenly quote Victor Hugo, his favorite expression, woman's flesh, ideal clay. Well, there was only one surgeon who had

been featured in the press with that quotation just a year earlier in Paris Match, and his name was Dr. Patrick Buey. He's a plastic surgeon at the American Hospital in Paris, who in that Paris match feature, which was entitled Operation Young Again, replied to a question that he was asked, and he said, woman's flesh, ideal clay. Now, why was this a bombshell enclosure or rather a threat that was made, a shot that was fired, if you will, to Brigitte Macron. Because in France, Patrick Bui is known most eminently for one thing, feminization surgery. He is the king of transgendered feminization surgery. To soften the face features, if you are a man trying to become a woman, it will soften your

face features with feminization surgery. And if there was any question that was remaining in anyone's minds as to whether or not he was indeed being used by Brigitte Macron, they needed to just wait until 2023 because here's a picture of them together. Yep. Years later, in 2023, Emmanuel Macron decided to award Dr. Patrick Bui with the French Legion of Honor, a high distinction in the French Republic. Imagine the Medal of Freedom in America. He's being awarded that. We're going to pause there because that is a lot of information for you to digest,

information for you to unpack, and information for you to research. Again, we are at the very tip of the iceberg when it comes to this couple and the connections and the power that they have and how they were able to execute this farce in the public. What we will show you in the next episode is how the storyline begins falling apart. And we can bring up that timeline again, how this perfectly curated idea of Brigitte's background, absent any pictures, people started to go, wait a second, something's not right here. And it sort of begins with just a couple of pictures that are released of Brigitte Macron in those years when she was allegedly a pinup doll. And she didn't look anything like a pinup doll. And she wasn't wearing short skirts. She was

wearing baggy suits and no, it didn't seem like someone in which teenagers would be falling over themselves. Here she is right here. There she is in her teaching days. That's the hot pinup Claudia Schiffer-esque and people began to go, wait a second, are we just being sold a bunch of lies? And the answer, of course, is going to be yes. But I want to first get into showing you the letter that we received yesterday from Brigitte Macron and Emmanuel Macron. But first, I am, before we read that letter in its entirety, going to throw it to one of our sponsors, Good Ranchers, who has stood by us from the very beginning. I absolutely love Good Ranchers. I don't know if you know this, but over 85% of the

grass-fed beef in stores is imported, and that is because the country of origin labeling law was repealed in 2015. So now meat can be packaged here in the U.S. and earn a product of the USA label, even if it was born, raised, and harvested overseas. The truth is, much of the meat on the grocery store shelves is filled with things that you don't want, antibiotics, hormones, questionable origins, and even harmful seed oils. But goodranchers.com is changing the way to buy meat.

Their meat is born, raised, and harvested right here in the USA, so you know exactly where it comes from. It's free from hidden additives, no antibiotics ever, no added hormones, and no seed oils. You can also check out the exclusive Candice Owens box with my handpicked selections. Support my show and you can directly support American ranchers by going to goodranchers.com slash Candice to shop today. And right now, Good Ranchers is running their new year and new meat promotion so you and your family can easily get the quality that you deserve. Subscribe to any of their boxes and get free ground beef, chicken breasts, or

salmon in every order for a year. Plus, you'll get $25 off when you use my code Candice at checkout. That's high quality, clean protein in every order delivered to your door for free for an entire year. So visit goodgranchers.com today and don't forget to use my code Candice and you'll clean your free meat and $25 off. All right, guys. So the letter, crazy. We are really just, I don't even know what to say here. I don't know what to say. So obviously, for those of you who have not checked out the past episodes, you should. We will, here on YouTube, we will put them all together so that you can see it as a series of everything that's happened with Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron. They sent us a letter, and essentially in that letter, they did not address the substance of the claim that Brigitte

Macron was a woman, but began to pick apart at other things that we had said and said, this could be defamation because of this, this could be defamation because of that. We responded to them and basically said, look, we're not in the business of lying. We believe, I believe rather, Candace believes that Brigitte McCrone was born a biological male. We're not doing this for funsies, obviously. Okay. And we're going to give you an opportunity to answer these questions. Yes or no. Very simple questions. We went over in the first episode, questions like, did the first lady, Brigitte McCrone, give birth to three children? Yes or no? Was she born a biological male? Who is the person in this photo? Et cetera, et cetera.

And they did not answer us at all. We gave them, I think, what would amount to 10 days, more than 10 days, perhaps, to respond before we launched the first installment of our series. We got no such luck. Then after the first installment, the introductory episode last night, we received an email from their legal team here in the United States. And I kid you not, I'm just going to read it to you in its entirety because I've realized that they're trying to assert the claim that we picked and chose what we read to you. Yeah, it was a 100-page letter. We didn't have three hours, and none of it answered our question as to whether or not Brigitte McCrone was a man. We get that you're trying to pretend that mistakes about colorization

could amount to defamation. We know your game. So let's jump into this letter that we received, and I'll explain to you what they're referencing and what we said back to them in our letter. So you can see it starts with letting us know that this is regarding, for instance, in the corner, they're confidential, not for publication or attribution. I really fail at that. Then they say it's regarding false and defamatory statements about President Emmanuel Macron and Brigitte Macron. They say, we write again on behalf of our clients, President and Mrs. Macron. That's the last time I think you're going to hear really about Brigitte. We were disappointed in your January 16, 2025 response to our December 3, 2024 letter. Despite our warnings and with full knowledge of their falsity, your client has doubled down on her defamatory

allegations. We're going to get to those. And indeed, expanded the scope of her defamation. We had wanted to spare Ms. Owens the scope of her defamation. We had wanted to spare Ms. Owens the embarrassment of openly confronting her false claims, but instead of doing the right and responsible thing, it seems she relishes in the public attention. So basically, they wrote me the first legal threat to spare me, you guys. They were just like, we want to help you and let you know that some things you said were wrong. And so this letter is a warning to you. How kind of this couple truly to find this in their heart. Let's keep reading. Since our letter, Ms. Owens has published several ex-posts and additional broadcasts, podcasts, pardon, further defaming

the McCrones. To the extent that the McCrones claims suffered from any of the legal deficiencies you pointed out in your letter, which they did not, Ms. Owens has eliminated any doubts about such claims and strengthened them with her new statements, most egregiously. On January 13th, 2025, Ms. Owens falsely implied that the McCrones were responsible for the death of a journalist investigating them. Okay, let's pause there because you guys watched the first episode. They're just lying here, right? There's just, I literally told you that every journalist that tries to touch this story, something happens to, okay? And it is a fact that Isabella Ferreira was working on the story, had messaged, according to her friends, saying that she had a bombshell about Emmanuel Macron in a brief sheet. The French press has reported on

this. And then she was found dead floating in a river, okay? Or a pond, whatever it was. And they, the public said that she had drowned, and her friends said that she was not suicidal. And the public, the press said that she had maybe taken some pills. I don't remember. The point is, is nowhere in the first episode did we say that Brigitte Macron and Emmanuel Macron assassinated this girl. We told you what happened, okay? Let's keep reading here. That incendiary implication is factually false, offensive, and incredibly damaging. Ms. Owens repeated this false claim on January 31st, 2025 and bolstered the implication, because they're not saying I said it, they're saying

you implied it, by stating that she, meaning me, did up on security after getting the letter from McCrone and the cause, and cause of things that we know about their network and things that are happening. Like I said, every journalist that tries to get this out. Yes, that is not a lie. That is the truth. We have upped our security because and we were responding to the chat, people saying, get yourself some good security. And of course, when you have people walking around your property and you have young children and you understand the extent of the stakes that are in this, getting an upping on your security, that is my right. OK, you don't get to tell me that I can't tell the public the truth

about that. Let's keep reading to see what they're upset about. Another outright lie, Ms. Owens has repeatedly stated that the McCrones admitted Mrs. McCrone statutorily raped President McCrone in our December 3rd letter. That is a complete fabrication as no such admission was made within our December 3rd letter or anywhere else. No, to the contrary, we showed exactly what you said, where you admitted that Emmanuel Macron was 15 and you admitted that Brigitte was 39. And we said to the public that is therefore an admission that it is statutory rape because the laws at that time stated that there could be no consent if the adult had authority over the child. And given the fact that that was a teacher and Emmanuel Macron was 15 years old and not of the age of consent, wrote that this is statutory rape. We said that you admitted to it, whether knowingly or not, by saying what I believe to be the

first time asserting in writing that their ages were 39 and 15. And to be clear, we are asserting that their ages were actually, in fact, 39 and 14, because 14 years old undeniably was the age in which Emmanuel Macron participated in that play. Let's keep reading. Your client's recklessness in making these false and damaging assertions is staggering. It goes on. You spend most of your letter discussing actual malice, but the well-documented evidence of actual malice here is overwhelming, and your client has only added to that record with her public statements after receiving our letter. As we laid out in our December 3rd, 2024 letter, Ms. Owens relies on facially unreliable sources to perpetuate an

inherently improbable conspiracy theory, despite the evidence refuting its truth. Ms. Owens claims she's a journalist, but repeatedly disregards journalistic standards in her reporting. She also continues to profit from these lies and blocking out a business name and even recently stated that she would start reselling the Man of the Year t-shirt, mocking Mrs. McCrone. And just as Ms. Owens claims that she does not have to credit the McCrones, a court similarly will not be obligated to credit her claims in the face of overwhelming evidence to disproving them. So they're saying literally a lot of nothing here other than it's an improbable conspiracy theory. All they have to do is write, Brigitte Macron was born a biological female. We are telling you that is a fact. They won't do that.

Brigitte Macron gave birth to three children. Their names are Laurence, Sebastian, and Tiffon. We are asserting that as a fact. Please correct the record. In our letter to them, we said we are happy to correct the record. We are happy to tell the truth. We even offered to fly to France to conduct the interview so that Brigitte could respond on record herself. We said anytime, any date, you let us know from here until, I think we gave them until March something. We will get on a plane and we will fly to you because we don't want to lie about this. And we're asking you to answer these. And if you don't want me to come and you don't want to invite me in the Elysee Palace, then please just answer these 21 questions so that we can include it in our reporting. They are declining to do so and instead saying it's an improbable conspiracy theory. That's it. That's what they're saying.

Okay, let's keep going because the letter's almost over. This is all it says. Since receiving our letter, Ms. Owens has supplied us with even more evidence. Okay, let's keep going because the letter's almost over. This is all it says. Since receiving our letter, Ms. Owens has supplied us with even more evidence. Okay, sorry, actually, we just went over that. Oh, no, that's right. Since receiving our letter, Ms. Owens has supplied us

with even more evidence of her reckless disregard of the truth, actual malice, and intent to further injure the McCrones. Ms. Owens received overwhelming written notice

of the evidence contradicting her claims in our December 3rd, 2024 letter. And yet she continues to double down and expand her lies. She has refused to retract any of the defamatory claims outlined in our letter. Ms. Owens also quoted from portions of our letter, but refused to present her audience with much of the substantive evidence refuting her claims. All of this is blatantly obvious attempt to further defame and injure the McCrones and hide the truth from the audience. She has repeatedly lied to about these issues. So essentially what they are saying is we sent you 100 page letter and we went over everything that could potentially be defamatory.

Like I said to you, ignoring the substance is Brigitte a man? Yes or no. A biological male? Yes or no. Was she born a biological male? Yes or no. And starting to nitpick colorizations of photos. And they're actually going to list the two things again, so I don't need to be redundant here. They're going to list parts of a letter that were in

their initial letter that we did not present to the public, which is why we're showing you this entire letter, because it's ridiculous. You're going to see exactly their pattern of not addressing the substance and always going to nitpick things that they say are defamatory. So let's keep going with this letter. It goes, Ms. Owens mistakenly believes that her false statements about the McCrones are protected by her freedom of speech and religion, or at least thinks that it will be useful to her cause to throw those terms around. Defamation is not entitled to First Amendment protection because, quote, there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact. And then they list a lawsuit, some jurisprudence there.

Thus, Ms. Owens cannot publish, here it comes, guys, an accusation that she knows has no evidence behind it as a fact to fit her desired storyline and then cloak herself in the First Amendment. A defamation claim premised in part, here we go, on Ms. Owens's false claims that the McCrones are involved with a satanic cult does not implicate any religious belief where no such group even exists. So they're saying here, and this I did, guilty as charged, they did a whole segment in their first letter about me saying, speaking about satanic and cults, guilty as charged, they did a whole segment in their first letter about me saying, speaking about satanic and cults, implying that they were in a satanic cult,

and they're saying that that is defamation. To talk about satan, talk about satanic cults, is a form of defamation. And they're asking me to correct the record, and I'm saying I'm not doing that because as a Christian, okay, I know that satanic cults do actually exist, and for them to allege that I said that they couldn't exist, that they don't exist is as completely insane and a violation of my right to practice my religion. So I'm not, I'm going to hold the line on that. I'm going to go hold the line,

which I did tell you guys on speaking about my viewpoint and the viewpoint shared by many that the Olympic ceremony was satanic. That is, even the main participants, Barbara Butch, OK, the lesbian who was at the center of that, laughed about the New Testament in her Instagram story and then pulled it down. You don't get the right to tell me that you're going to sue me for defamation because I'm talking about Satanism in a context that makes you uncomfortable since you handpicked Thomas Jolly to put on this performance? My answer is no. So let's keep reading your letter and get to the other points

that you feel that I've taken away, okay? Likewise, the remaining false claims made by Ms. Owens are not based on her religious beliefs just because she uses religious rhetoric to gain followers. Yeah, that's what I'm doing every mass. Every Sunday, I'm just trying to gain followers. Your equally ridiculous explanation to excuse Ms. Owens's false statement from legal liability that the statements are supposedly rhetorical hyperbole also failed. So my my on this next portion, my lawyer wrote back to them because they said another defamatory claim was me saying Emmanuel Macron was a psycho. And they're alleging that that is defamation. Again, none of this is about the substance of the claim that Brigitte's a man. But we're going to give you what their response to is that.

First, if Ms. Owens sincerely believes that what she says, which she repeatedly claims, the statements are not rhetorical hyperbole, statements that consist of rhetorical hyperbole, a vigorous epithet, or loose figurative or hyperbolic language are protected because they cannot reasonably be interpreted as stating actual facts about an individual. Ms. Owens cannot simultaneously take the position that she believes the truth of her defamatory assertions and that those statements are exaggerations that no reasonable person would take seriously as statements of purported fact. If anything, this nonsensical argument in your letter only further demonstrates that Ms. Owens deliberately distorts the truth for shock value to our audience, a further admission of her malice and financial incentive to defame the McCrones.

Moreover, the context of her statements flatly disproves any notion that Ms. Owens was not seriously maintaining an assertion of actual fact. To the contrary, Ms. Owens repeatedly asserts that she is providing facts and recently noted a trove of evidence of her false claims. Ms. Owens stated this clearly and eliminated any doubt that she was engaging in rhetorical hyperbole when she claimed on January 10th, 2024, that she is exposing what she deems to be the truth. Previously, she made the defamatory assertion that President Macron is a psychopath while citing research supposedly supporting her allegation and claims that Mrs. Macron's purported sexual abuse of President Macron turned him into a psychopath, with her claiming to expose the truth that is supported by research, no reasonable listener could possibly believe that Ms. Owens was engaging in rhetorical hyperbole,

not meant to be taken seriously. So I'm showing you this full letter because it's important for you to understand this is the exact strategy that they have gone after reporters, okay, in France. When you see suddenly the mainstream media goes, she won a defamation claim. It's never about whether or not Brigitte Macron is a man. She's never won that ever. It's always about this person identified the wrong person in the photo. She's saying that Emmanuel Macron was a psychopath? Does she have the credentials? Is she able to, as a non-PhD in psychiatry, to assert that he's a psychopath? I'm going to go to court and find out. And then when they win and they get like a, you know, a civil harassment charge, their media, who I just explained to you in this episode how they control that media,

rushes to print that she won a defamation suit. Have you heard them once, throughout this entire letter, simply assert that Brigitte Macron was, in fact, born a female? Have you heard them assert that Brigitte Macron did not, the current first lady, transition? No. It's petty little claims. And this is just the end of the letter here. I'm not hiding anything from you. Let's keep going. And yes and this is just the end of the letter here that i'm not hiding anything from you let's keep going and yes it is true both of these things were in their first letter about him being a psychopath and about satanic cults they wrote that your claim that macron that the macrons have not been damaged by your client's false statements

is further belied by the second sentence of your january 16th letter in your words canis is an international sensation. Oh, thank you, lawyer. Thank you. I got a good lawyer. He's so kind. Her false claims have reached an international audience. The views, the likes, the comments, the downloads, the shares of her false statements provide conclusive proof that Ms. Owens's fabrications are believed and repeated. It is self-evident that Ms. Owens's proliferation of these false claims has resulted in impairment of reputation and standing in the community, personal humiliation, mental anguish, and suffering. Suffering so much so, ladies and gentlemen, that they won't just simply answer the basic question

that we are asking. Are you Brigitte McCrone? Were you Brigitte McC were you Brigitte Macron born a biological female circle yes or no please stop with these letters please anyways it wraps up by them demanding this rather bizarre demand lastly your letter to not acknowledge our legal hold demand for your convenience to repeat it here till these issues are resolved please ensure that your principles and all of your sources are preserving and retaining emails and text messages, audio, visual recordings. Yeah. Okay. Dummy. It's all here on YouTube. Okay. Oh, what do you think we're hiding? We've already asserted what we think. I've said it a thousand times. I believe Brigitte McCrone was born a biological male. Okay. And then transitioned into a female. That's, that is my belief. I don't know how many times I can say it. What do you think you're going to

find in my messages? Like what? What's your smoking gun here? You got it. You got it, dude. We're acknowledging it publicly. We will keep all of our YouTube files. We will keep all the video files. We'll keep our text messages, our logs, our tweets. Our tweets, so you can show that I meant what I said, what I said, and then you can explain why it is you can't just answer the questions. Again, this is just an intimidation tactic. They obviously have not answered any of our questions to put an end to this, which completely removes them from this claim that they're being so mentally anguished, but they can't just simply assert the truth, dancing around things that nobody cares about. Nobody cares. She called Emmanuel Macron a psycho. That is just,

that hurts. But he didn't care, obviously, when the Algerian press referred to him as a homosexual psychopath. They weren't sued. He's coming after Candace. A lot of people have asserted that Emmanuel Macron is a psychopath and have not been sued. But he wants us to know he's really serious. He's coming to Tennessee. I think, do it. Stop wasting your time with these letters. Go file the lawsuit. Okay. The entire world wants to know the answer to the question. And I believe I already know the answer to the question. Like I said, we are peeling back the layers of this onion very slowly,

helping people to understand who is in your circle, how we were able to pull this off, how you were able to gaslight the entire world. What you're doing right now, okay? Because this is what you do. We're going to reveal your legal strategy of not addressing the elephant in the room as you complain about things around it. Oh gosh, well, she said psycho. She said, oh, he's a psycho. How could she say that? He's so

hurt. He's anguished. You're pathetic, Emmanuel, okay? You're absolutely pathetic. This letter is pathetic. So when you send me back a letter and then quote me saying what is pathetic, just know I'm going to stand by that too, okay? I believe in satanism i don't think it's a figment of anybody's imagination first and foremost so good luck with that in the american court especially in the south where people still have faith you know and uh good luck trying to prove that you're not a psycho when uh tons of people have purported in the press that you are psychopathic and that they saw that during COVID. Tons of people wrote about that, about your mental condition. And you will never, ever, ever get me to transform my opinion that you were groomed by the person you eventually married in 2007, Brigitte Macron.

I believe she's a man. How many more times can I say it? How many more ways can I say it? Should I say it in French? Parlez-vous français? Should I learn a little bit of French to say it in another way? This is just getting ridiculous, okay? The entire public is now paying attention, Emmanuel and Brigitte. And I know you're staying up late to watch this at the Elysee Palace, probably all in a room. You're probably standing next to your next PR

agent now that you've sunk Mimi because things were becoming apparent about her history. I know that you're worried about this, not because of somebody calling you a psycho. How thin-skinned could a G7 leader get, okay? But you're worried about the substance, and we're going to get to the substance, and the entire world is going to watch us do it. So I conclude this, Mr. and Mr. Macron, by thanking you for promoting this series in the only way that you know how, by crying like little babies publicly and thinking that I'm going to keep this private or secret. I believe in radical transparency. I tell my followers everything because I view them as friends. I don't even view

them as fans. I view them as people who, like me, are concerned citizens who have a right to know who the hell is running our countries. It's that simple. And I'm very concerned about who is running your country. I'm very concerned about it. I'm very concerned about their ties to the American media. And I'm very concerned that most people in the world are just hearing about this story, which is demented, okay? And it gets more demented every episode. So we're not going to stop.

And whoever it is behind the DDoS attacks, you're not going to be able to stop this. For those of you that are watching, we ask you to support our work as independent journalists, obviously. The best way for you to do that is to go to CandaceOwens.com. You can give a gift. You can buy some merch to support us. I know overseas sometimes that can be a lot with the fees that they include on shipping, but you can just give a gift and support us that way. Or you can sign up for all of our offerings on CandaceOwens.com. I would deeply appreciate it. We are aware that everything that we do, we take tremendous risk, but we feel that it is necessary risk to protect children. And

that's what this is about at the end of the day, protecting children from people that we believe are predatory. And I believe that Brigitte Macron was a predator. Make no mistake. I believe she is a predator. I believe that she's manipulating the press and manipulating the courtrooms. It's predatory. Manipulating journalists, trying to shut down speech, all of it's predatory. So that is our conclusion, you guys. Thank you so much for tuning in to episode one.