Candace - Liar, Liar, TPUSA On Fire? More Exclusive Footage From 9/10. | Ep 377

Episode Date: August 19, 2026

Joe Rogan discusses the Tyler Robinson case on his show, a former CIA officer questions why the FBI is involved in the case, and I sentence TPUSA to more truth. 00:00 - Start. 01:26 - Discussing the cameras from 9/10. 21:20 - Exclusive footage. 30:02 - Former CIA officer questions FBI involvement. 34:33 - Joe Rogan discusses the case on his show. 39:45 - WearForbidden's new hilarious video. 45:11 - Comments. PreBorn!​​ ​ To donate, dial #250 and say they keyword “BABY" or by visiting https://preborn.com/candace The Wellness Company​ Try the new 45-capsule RX Parasite Cleanse with two full cycles, now $250 less. USA compounded and doctor prescribed. Visit https://twc.health/CANDACE and use code CANDACE for $52 off plus free shipping. USA residents only 🇺🇸 Paleovalley​ Get 20% off your order with promo code CANDACE at http://www.paleovalley.com American Financing​​​​​​​​​​​​​ NMLS 182334, http://www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org. APR for rates in the 5s start at 6.327% for well qualified borrowers. Call 800-795-1210 for details about credit costs and terms. Visit http://www.AmericanFinancing.net/Owens. Average savings based on borrowers who save over $199.99. Candace Clips Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@ClipsCandaceOwens Candace Official Website: https://candaceowens.com Candace Merch: https://shop.candaceowens.com Candace on Apple Podcasts: https://t.co/Pp5VZiLXbq Candace on Spotify: https://t.co/16pMuADXuT Candace on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/RealCandaceO Candace en Español: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensEnEspanol Candace Owens em Português: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensemPortugues Candace Owens en Français: https://www.youtube.com/@CandaceOwensEnFrançais Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

All right, you guys, happy Tuesday to everyone, accept the people who think that we need positive evidence to share our opinions and cannot comprehend why that's patently ridiculous. Like, I think granola is delicious when I'm pregnant. Where's your positive evidence for that? We can just say what we think, put ideas together. And I stated yesterday, there must be a sentence handed down from the Court of Candice for Turning Point USA's misdemeanor offense. they ran a foul of CO code 92784, colluding with debate bro slabs to attack me, violating my personal space, ignoring the rules, having the permanent creep Stephen Crowder sneak his CEO into my home to join Stephen's show from my children's playroom without my

consent, without my knowledge. None of that can be tolerated under the current law that we have on the book. And we all know what their punishment is. It's what the punishment always is. I am the magistrate. Therefore, the judge and the jury. They have been sentenced to what they hate the most. More truth. Welcome back to Candace.

Get ready because it's another big one. It is explosive. We have something to share if it's never been seen. Our favorite. But first, we have to jog your memory of whence we came. And I want you to lock it in really pay attention to the details. They matter. So I'm going to ask you the question, what was the original moment that made people suspicious of what happened on September 10th?

What was the first thing that you saw online that made your eyebrow raise, so to speak? I would offer that it was when Terrell Farnsworth, Turning Point USA's audio and visual lead, he runs visual impulse, was seen taking down the cameras, particularly actually taking down one camera. camera, the camera behind Charlie's head. And this turned out was less than four minutes after Charlie was hit. We know he went up and he recorded himself. He announced that Charlie was dead. He went down and he began removing that camera in particular. Before anybody knew who he was, people I knew who he was. But the rest of the world just went, what's going on? Why are we violating a crime scene? Why is somebody moving a chair that Charlie was just sitting in to stand up and take that camera down. And I actually should be honest, unlike the rest of the world, I was not immediately

suspicious because I knew Terrell. You'll recall this, right? I reached out to him, I've known him for years, and I said, what's up? I assumed that there had to be some sort of a reasonable explanation. That conversation took place, remind you, on September 18th. We reached out to Terrell, got him on the phone, was expecting something simple, and instead, it was the phone call itself. It was the phone call itself. that made me feel suspicious. I went to my team. Something is wrong. I've gone over at this moment to you guys so many times.

It's because Terrell was nervous. He was offering me various increasingly bizarre reasons as to why he could not show me the back footage. People thought maybe the back footage caught the person from a crowd that was shot Charlie. And I just said, okay, let me see it. And he said he didn't want to share it because he didn't want Erica to see Charlie get hit.

in 4K. And I said, okay, well, it doesn't need to be shared. You can just tell me, and I'll tell audiences that I saw it and everything's okay. And the craziest part of all was him telling me, again, you'll recall, because I said this to you, right? When it happened, specifically that he did not know how to send the file to me. I said, to send it to me. I'll watch it. Obviously, I won't share it.

And he said, I don't know how to send the file. And I said, Harold, you run an AV company. What do you mean you don't know how to send a file? And then he admitted that he did know how to send a file, but he didn't want to do it for fear that Google might hack him. Go back, watch the episodes. That's what he said. I've got proof that Google might hack him.

What? But you see, it turns out that now we know that Terrell lied to me. Terrell's a liar. I sensed it then, yes, I had an immediate intuition that Terrell was lying to me. that he maybe did know how to send a file, but he wasn't actually fearful that Google might hack him. They keep telling us our intuition means nothing, right?

But guess what? My intuition and vibe in that matter has been proven correct. It was confirmed when the preliminary hearing took place actually. You may have missed it. I'll sew that down for you. The lead investigator on the case,

SBI agent David Hull, explained on the stand. Actually, on September 10th. So that would be eight days before I spoke to Terrell. Actually, on the very day of the assassination, Terrell apparently did know how to send footage, and he chose to do that via a Google link. He used the very company that he would then tell me eight days later he was afraid was going to hack him. That makes Terrell a liar. He lied to me. I don't like when people lied to me. And like I said, there is entirely no dispute that he lied to me

about his fear of a Google hack because he actually signed and submitted an 1102 statement to that effect. He was entered in and discussed during the hearing. We can show you this statement from Terrell. And it tells us, and I'm going to read the first part first, and on September 10th, I, Terrell, the first person here, was present at the Turning Point USA

Utah Valley University event. Myself and my team were there to provide audio video equipment set up management and support, as we had done for Mr. Charlie Kirk for years. Our camera setup consisted of three angles, an angle directly on Charlie, an angle on the individual asking questions, and a wider angle behind Charlie that showed the audience and the crowd reaction. Okay, so a wider angle behind Charlie that showed the audience and the crowd reaction. That day on September 10th, I provided SBI with four videos through a Google Drive.

And then you see the link. And he tells you what those videos are labeled. Okay. And then he says these videos were taken by me and my team at the UVU event on September 10, 2005. These videos, as they were provided to SBI, are a true and correct representation of what took place at. UVU. Okay. Now let's understand that first portion first. He says that there are four videos that he sent to them. He says that there are three cameras. I want to remember which cameras we saw around Charlie, generally speaking. Now, there is one moving camera that I want to point out,

which may potentially be the fourth camera, which was operated by a guy that seemed to be floating from side to side. I'm going to show you that. I'm again, assuming this might have been a contractor, and maybe Terrell got that footage from him and he was going from side to side. You remember him? But the more pertinent ones are the three static cameras that he is representing in his statement, that he was operating. Here is the diagram of those static cameras, the three shots. Now, we have one to the front left side of Charlie that is being operated by Robert Golow. In theory, I would say that it is actually the camera that is circled in blue right there. The yellow one is operated by Robert Golo.

That's the one that he is going to be facing the person that's asking questions. The one that is in blue is the one that I would say would carry the most critical graphic up-close evidence of Charlie Kirk being shot, right? That's the one that was being operated by Jordan Wilson. In other words, if I were trying to gather evidence very quickly within minutes of of Charlie Kirk being shot, I'd go blue. That's an opinion. I'm saying, were I in control of the AB department and I was trying to be useful to police,

I'd probably grab that footage as critical evidence. And then I would grab that footage of what's circled in yellow, which we just discussed, that is, as he described, pointing to the person that's asking questions. We know that that has some rotating capability. I'd probably grab that one second, right, if you're trying to help detectives secure the best footage

to scan the crowd, since that is the crowd footage, as he demonstrated, potentially to find a shooter in the crowd, I'd go, okay, number two. One, two, I'm trying to be useful. But that third camera, to me, if I'm running this event, is instantly the most irrelevant because A, it's facing downward. B, it's behind Charlie.

and traditionally, in case you're wondering or need reminding, all it showed was a view of what was happening below and around Charlie's feet and captured some audience, right? But not more than the yellow camera's going to capture. The red camera, if you weren't to capture the audience, you go with the yellow. And the reason why I'm saying traditionally that is what it showed is because there was a massive discovery from YouTuber Nissy when she realized that Terrell Farnsworth, when he finally did show me the completely non-graphic footage from behind Charlie's head,

had presented to me what appeared to her to be a zoomed-in shot from that camera. This is important that we go back and we revisit what it is that Nissy caught about that camera. Take a listen. In this footage that Terrell has selectively shared with Candice, we have. can't see the ground where Charlie had been sitting. You're probably thinking, okay, so what? Well, I'll tell you what. Actually, I'll show you what. On February 28, 2025, the American comeback tour did a stop at Florida State University, and here is the back camera shot. On March 3rd, 2025, the American comeback tour did a stop at the University of Southern California, and here is the

back camera shot. Here's San Francisco. Here's San Diego, Long Beach, Boise, Idaho, Washington State. Do you notice a pattern? The camera is a wide-angle camera and was always used as such. However, in the footage that Terrell has selectively shared with Candace, you cannot see the ground. So either that day at UVU, they had changed things up and they had zoomed in the camera so that you couldn't see the area around Charlie or Terrell had zoomed in. after the fact, and he was showing a cropped version of the footage to Candice.

Why did Terrell do that? Now, we've already demonstrated from Terrell's 1102 statement that he's willing to lie to me, so I don't think we can go directly to him and ask that question. We're going to have to continue to prod this narrative on our own to join Nissy. She raises an important question. Did Terrell do this after the fact? When did he do this? Because what we learn is compelling from Agent Hull that on September 10th,

Teryl did not give them the SD cards. So we see him, we're going to show you, him race to take down that camera to then take the SD card out of that camera. And our assumption was that he handed that over to the SBI that was in charge of the investigation. But Hull is going to testify that no, Terrell gave them a flash drive.

This means that Teryl inserted that SD card into a computer and then copied the footage onto a flash drive and similarly created Google links, even though days later he would be concerned that Google might hack him. Initially, he gave them Google links, but not the original SD card. Why? Why not hand the direct SD card over to the SBI's lead investigator? I mean, did Terrell think that they were not equipped with knowledge of how to use an SD card?

Even I am, and I'm terrible at technology. But let's listen to Agent Hull's testimony, because actually, kind of absurd to consider that. Agent Hold any more video? Did you collect it? Either you or another agent with the SBA? Yes, we were able to collect video. TPSA had a videographer,

a visual impulse, who was taking coverage of the event, and they provided video to us that they had captured on September 10th of 2025. And do you know who or how that video was collected from visual impulse? Yeah, Mr. Farnsworth originally provided, I believe, a flash drive to Lieutenant O'Brien with one of the local agencies.

And a short time after that on September 10th, he provided downloadable versions, electronic versions to Agent Mortensen. And an 1102 was collected from him on May 6th of 26. Not the SD card, though. So when the footage began going viral, the client. of Terrell taking down that camera in particular. People online, I think, rightfully speculated that there must have been something really important

about that back footage behind Charlie's head specifically. And then people were gaslit. We were told, no, there was nothing unique about that camera. There was nothing unique about that footage in particular. Terrell actually grabbed all of the footage, and he did so because people were stealing and people are evil, which we then said our common sense went, that doesn't really make sense,

because if he was worried about people stealing, wouldn't he be concerned with the camera? It was just the SD card that he took out. It was Andrew Colvette, who offered that excuse, by the way, to Tucker Carlson. Again, I'd like to remind you here is what he said. So Charlie was very well aware of the existence of evil, obviously. So we're us on his team. You know, there's a, by the way, just one other conspiracy theory,

I just want to snuff out here. one of our dear friends that literally from the very beginning started with us and loved Charlie like a brother, he grabbed the SD cards out of the camera afterwards. And there's all these conspiracy videos about why did he grab the SD cards? Well, first of all, they're in the possession of the FBI. Okay. It's not like he took them and like ran off with them. Second of all, I asked him personally. I said, why did you do that? And he looked at me and this was his answer. He said, because I know people can be evil. And he did not want that footage being grabbed by somebody.

There was videos of people after the incident going and stealing hats off the table. I mean, so I'm so grateful he did that. And that that was his instinct. He's like, I'm depressed to know that that was why I did that. But I knew that I had to protect that footage because I wanted, I mean, you know, you're recording in like 4K, you know. And so I'm so glad he did that. It's beautiful.

It's really beautiful. I'd like to, he just, he said, because I know people can be evil. Let me try that again. Because I know people can be evil. Okay, one more time. I just want to give with as much passion as Andrew did. I took the SD cards because I know people can be evil. Beautiful, beautiful. Really, the Academy Award goes to you, Andrew, but you said cards. And what we noticed was that it was card. It was that one first. It struck me and others as odd. But here is Andrew reinforcing the narrative that this is a conspiracy theory. There was nothing special about that particular footage behind Terrell's head. He was actually worried about all of it. But actually, if you keep reading Terrell's 1102 statement, it flies in the face of what Andrew has said.

There was something unique about the footage behind Charlie's head. There had to be something particular about that footage, which moved Terrell or maybe someone in the SBI, but it's not clear, to create a clip out of only the footage behind Charlie's head, I mean, behind Charlie's head. Just that back footage. We're going to read the rest of the statement, okay? Terrell writes in the statement, and we can pull up that statement if you guys have it. It reads, regarding the clip, which has been labeled 80704, turning point footage of the crowd, and behind Charlie, I have reviewed, and from what I can see, it is a true and correct representation of a portion of the larger files previously sent to SBI. So let me slow that down

for you because it's very important. What we are learning is that they had four videos. Go pull that back up, please, and you can split this. They had four videos in total, and you can bring me in on this, just so I can explain this. And of those four videos, they're telling us the length of each of those videos here. One is 26 minutes, another one is 26 minutes, another 26 minutes, and a fourth one is 23 minutes. So that, I'm guessing, assuming represents, because this, Charlie got hit very quickly into the event, that this represents the full length of all of that footage of the cameras that I showed you. Despite having all of that footage, they decided to clip from the camera behind Charlie's head a special clip. And that is what Terrell is saying, you know,

to, I believe this is a true representation of the footage that was recorded. Why did they need to clip out from the full footage of that camera just a little three-minute clip? That's the question. Okay? So what we can discern from this is that for whatever reason, of all the camera footage that was provided across four cameras, only one of the four cameras that had footage, they felt they needed to turn into a clip.

Like I said, we're not sure if Terrell clipped it or if it was SBI that clipped it. We do know that Terrell was the first to touch that footage. And we do know that the footage wound up clipped. And Terrell is testifying in a statement that from what he can see, it appears to be a true and correct representation of the portion of the larger files. Now, the way that he is phrasing that is interesting, a true and correct representation, because it would still be true and correct it would still be a true and correct representation if it was zoomed in.

We learned that during the whole back and forth regarding 12.1 and 12.4 in the courtroom when they were debating, they got to see zoomed in footage, but they were like, this is still a true representation of what happened. We're just zooming in and making some circles. So Terrell is basically saying it's still a true representation. It's plausible that the only reason they would have to clip that out is because it was zoomed in. You would have to create a new clip if you were zooming it in. You couldn't just run that in the entire content.

So again, I want to underscore what I'm saying to you here. Okay? You would have to clip the footage in order to zoom it. I am making the case based on Terrell's 1102, but the footage behind Charlie's head was specifically clipped. And I'm also going to make the case that contrary to what Andrew Colvert is saying, there was something special about that footage behind Charlie's head. And Terrell beeline to it.

in particular. And he was nervous about that footage in particular because he did not instantly grab all of the SD cards. He grabbed that one and he did it nervously. That's what people saw. He was looking around to see who was watching him as he took only the SD card from that camera before he disappears behind the tent. Let's watch that together. Here he is. Here he is. He's taking down the camera altogether. If you're worried about theft, take the whole camera. It's pretty small. It's in your hand. He doesn't do that. He takes it apart.

And he takes the SD card out. And he looks around. He wants to see who's looking at him. And then he looks down at it and he walks around. And we had wondered, what did Terrell do when he walked around? He hasn't addressed any other camera there, just that one. Well, you don't have to wonder what he did anymore because today I can and tell you what Terrell did,

because I've actually known what Terrell did since October. As I was wondering, who could be trusted at Turning Point USA? And like I said to you instantly, there was a network of government employees that were fighting to get the truth out and wondering who they could trust as well. And now appears to be the moment to not tell you what Terrell did,

but to rather show you and let you draw your own conclusions about whether Terrell appeared concerned about anything other than that particular footage. Okay? Here is what Terrell did thereafter, seen for the first time. Terrell is there. He looks around again, nervously, and he puts the SD card in his pocket,

and he zips up. He doesn't run to the other. cameras and try to grab the SD card. Instead, what he does is he whips out his phone and he begins texting with someone. And that's what he does. He's texting with someone to say what? Who's he texting? What's he saying? If he's just out there fighting evil and worried about securing the footage, why didn't he grab the other SD card or three of them in a row? Who was he in communication with after he grabs that? Because I got to tell you something, Andrew.

Weren't me, and I was amongst my peers sitting on a jury. I would not accept your narrative that he looks like he's worried about people stealing. Not about the hats, not about the other footage. not about the cameras. It looks to me like, and again, this is my opinion, it looks to me like he's completing a task and checking in with someone to say that a task is completed. Maybe, I don't know, I'm open to everything,

maybe there was some police officer who told him to take that footage in particular. I'm told that didn't happen. And I will say this, that when someone demonstrates that they are capable of lying to you, you have a right to take note. And Terrell lied to me. He lied to me about his fears regarding Google.

It is therefore my opinion on the basis of everything that we are observing with our eyes, everything that I am observing with my two eyes, his mannerisms, the beeline to that footage so quickly within four or five minutes, as if that had to be secured.

The 1102 statement, where we know that that footage in particular was clipped. I'm speculating because it was zoomed in. The questions that Kathy Nestor asked thereafter, things that she asserted about they don't know whether or not that footage was edited, your claim that the FBI has it, why? It's a Utah case.

Why would the FBI have the SD cards? When I observe everything with my eyes, again, I don't think they're going to call me for jury duty in Utah, but it demonstrates to me that that footage was prioritized. So now the question is why. It was zoomed in, and if Nisi is correct, and this was unusual and knew that that footage would be zoomed in, then the only thing that would be accomplished by that sort of a crop and a zoom in

would be not showing us what happened below Charlie. but I need that footage. I'm being sued by Brian Hartpole. I'm going to need that footage. I'm going to trace that footage and to be able to understand the custody of that footage and whether or not, as Kathy Nestor is asking,

it was edited before it was given via Google Link or via a flash drive to the SBI. And I'm genuinely asking, questions here. But why did Terrell tell me that he spoke with Erica about that footage specifically? Again, he was lying a lot on that phone call, so I can't assert that he was telling the truth, but I do know and I have proof that that's what he told me. And why did Turning Point USA gaslight us about the significance of the footage? Now we can read the case and see that there

was something about that footage that required something different and the other cameras and the other videos that were running. It's significant enough for the SBI to create a specialized clip from it or Terrell decree a specialized clip from it. Why continually gaslight the public into believing otherwise, pretending there's nothing interesting there? Terrell just violated a crime scene to secure it because he was worried about evil. Because people can be evil. Is the SD card still in his right pant pocket, Andrew? Terrell, anybody? You say it was given to the FBI? Okay, well, why? To state crime? The FBI under the law is allowed to assist, but they don't have jurisdiction over the crime,

over the state. In all practicality, the FBI should have been handed the SD card. And then if they wanted to, they could have handed it off to the FBI, but that should have been the flash drive copy. Anyway, I'm going to continue to think while it's still legal to do so. And I'm certain the internet will join me in that exercise. We'll be right back after a brief break.

All right, you guys, I want to pass along a heartfelt thank you for my friends over at Preborn. Their president, Dan Steiner, asked me to share just how grateful they are for faithful supporters like you. So far this year, because of generous partners, more than 50,000 babies have been rescued from abortion. That means 50,000 lives change in generations have been impacted. Every tax deductible gift is used to rescue babies and share the whole. hope of Jesus Christ with their mothers. In fact, this year alone, more than 8,000 women have made the decision to follow Christ, all because someone like you helped provide a free ultrasound. It costs just $28 to provide one life-saving ultrasound, and $15,000 can place an ultrasound machine

in a pregnancy clinic where it can save countless lives for years to come. Your generosity is saving lives for both earth and eternity. And today, there are still mothers waiting for that same life-changing moment. If you'd like to give, dial £2.50 and save the keyword baby. That's pound 250 baby or visit preborn.com slash candace. Again, that's preborn.com slash candice. I also want to remind you guys about the wellness company because Americans love sushi. Over the last two decades, raw fish consumption has exploded. Sushi bars are literally everywhere, grocery stores, gas stations, sell it, and millions of people now eat raw fish weekly. But there is a hidden risk that most people never think about. Parasites. Salmon is one of the most

popular fish worldwide, but it naturally contains more than 70 parasites. Most are tiny and nearly impossible to see and they're making their way into the human body. Once inside, parasites can hide for years while frequently laying eggs before any symptoms appear. Dr. Peter McCullough recommends doing a parasite cleanse at least once a year as a preventative measure. The wellness company offers a hard to access RX parasite cleanse, USA compounded ivermectin and membenazole. Ivermectin paralyzes the parasite's nervous system, while membenzol starves them. Each capsule contains 25 milligrams of Iro-mectin and 250 milligrams of Mimbenazol. Lab tested for quality.

You can now get a more budget-friendly 45 capsule option that costs $250 less, giving you two 21-day parasite cleanse cycles. Same formula as the original, just a smaller quantity. So head over to twc.health slash candace and use code canis at checkout to save $52 off plus free shipping. Again, that's twc.health slash candis. It's for USA residents only.

So many things that I know. And I think the biggest thing is don't send a slob to my house. I don't do that. Please don't do that again. Especially when I am pregnant with a boy. It's deeply upsetting to me and it's unnecessary. Andrew, Erica, in particular, you guys are really starting to partner with people

who are interested in trying to psychologically go after me and my family tormentos publishing things about my children's cars and the vehicles that they travel in. I think you should stop doing that. If I could just put something in the suggestion box, just call off the dogs or don't, and we can keep having fun. Anyway, speaking of this totally inappropriate chain of custody, the FBI jumping on the case like cowboys, that's not how this works, actually. They are supposed to be used because your tax dollars pay for these things. things when there is a case that obviously violates federal law. If it's happening on federal property, you don't get to have cowboy cash Patel just go,

I'm just going to come and bring everybody with me and take over the whole case and evidence. Yes, the State Bureau of Investigations, as you saw, can reach out to the FBI and help ask them to assist with certain testing and things of that nature. But the custody goes, FBI and then FBI. So why the FBI interjected so quickly is in and of itself. kind of a conspiracy. There was a man named John Kiriku, who is a former CIA officer who had a conscience back in 2007

during the quote-unquote war on terror. He became a terror. He became a government whistleblower about how some of the terrorists were being tortured. Anyway, John Kiraku went on to the Danny Jones podcast, and here is what he had to say about the FBI's involvement

in the Charlie Kirk case. Why is the FBI involved in this? Charlie Kirk was killed in Utah by a kid from Utah who left his house in Utah, drove to the university in Utah and allegedly shot Charlie Kirk. Nobody ever crossed a state line. There's literally nothing in this case that would make it federal unless there was a conspiracy in which kids. case, it would be a federal case and the FBI would be involved. So Cash Patel was asked this early on

and he said, we're just offering the FBI's expertise to the Utah state police. Like, really? Is that just what it is? Because offering your expertise means sticking stuff in a FedEx and sending it to Utah so they can do with it what they want. Or maybe you put one FBI, you know, lab person at their disposal. You don't have the FBI director fly out there with a with a plain load of FBI agents. It's not a federal case. I don't understand. He is correct. This is unusual. And you have a right to feel that this is very suspicious. You have a right to ask questions as I demonstrated in my back forth with Andrew Wilson. You have a right to look at this and go, hey, it's very strange that Cash Patel apparently shut down Joe Kent, who wanted to investigate whether or not there are foreign ties.

If there are no foreign ties, then why would you have an issue with people investigating those non-existent foreign ties? And then people say, hey, I think there's foreign ties. You gaslight them and say you have no positive evidence. How could we have positive evidence? When the department that's supposed to find that positive evidence is told, don't do that. And then we had turning point USA who was upset with the person who wanted to investigate those ties, but not upset with Cash Patel. going to events with Cash Patel

dressed up, your buddy buddy, people are starting to notice that all of this does feel and look like a conspiracy. For the players on a ball, we don't know. But as I said, as they were intentionally trying to trip me into a lawsuit so you can see they're all salivating

for me to be sued. To turnipzig to sue her, turning point you, sue her, take her money, take her money, shut her down, bankrupt her. Charlie Kirk got killed and she cared. and she won't let it go. Bankrupt her, bankrupt her. Okay. Well, guess what?

People are taking notice of that being odd as well. You're going after the people who are investigating it and you're becoming increasingly more vicious in how you do it. You are spending a lot of money to do it. You are lying on record getting caught in lies and then gaslighting us by saying, you don't have a right to recognize those lies.

You recognize those lies. You have no right to recognize those lies. It's demonic for you to notice them. It's not working. And this is, this has gone mainstream, obviously. And it is being discussed on the biggest platforms in the world, whether that's Sean Ryan or more recently Joe Rogan, who had a laugh alongside his guests, Mark Norman, Shane Gillis, and Ari Schaefer, as they were discussing the Tyler Robinson case. And the odd and increasingly odd public relations campaign that is surrounding. Erica Kirk, take a listen.

I get it. Waring that mask for a little bit, though, genuinely, both Duncan and I both gain respect for the furries. Yeah, but then they shoot the president. Nah, I don't know if they did. Wasn't that guy a furry? No, he loved a furry.

Oh, he loved a furry. Yeah, but I'm not even sure if that's true. The more time goes on, the more I'm leaning towards Candace Owens. I don't think any story that you hear in the news is accurate. I think there's always... None.

Or spin on it, at least. There's always some spin. But the public believes it. Whatever the spin is, whatever the spin is about Tyler Robinson, there's some bullshit to it. I don't know how much of his bullshit, but there's some bullshund. One of the more recent bullshit is they found a photo that they were saying was Tyler Robinson, but then people noticed that the, because he was real thin, people notice that the cars in the background, the proportions were distorted.

And then they realized that what they had done was taking a guy who's like much wider than Tyler Robinson and shrunk in the perspective. Really? Yep. Yep, and then when you see him for what he really looks like, like, oh, there's no way that's that guy. That guy's big. And then you're like, well, it's mostly true. Like, no, you're not shifting it.

No, no, they change, like, you look at the hood of the cars behind them. They're all like that narrow. Who is that guy? What guy? Tyler Robinson. He was the guy who supposedly shot Charlie Kirk. Kirk, yeah. Not the president.

Have you ever seen Drewski's America Kirk? Yeah, I didn't. Where are people threatening him? They were going to sue him for that? I don't know. It was funny, though. He's so funny. He's the best thing that ever happened in a camera.

When he came out. He starts doing cartwheels and shit with white face on. He's killing her that guy. Every video kills this. When he goes to the NASCAR? Yeah, he's funny. Funny dude. Funny dude.

People that got upset with that shot up. I know. You don't think it's weird. The lady comes out to sparkers behind her. You're out of your fucking mind. That's insane. I know. You don't think someone can make fun of that.

She walks out like Randy Orton. He's like, Gohberg coming out of the shark. He's going out like a f***er. The queen wore black for 80 years. You're going to the whole thing is crazy. In an interview, she dresses like, like, Sealed Team 6. She's all blacked out with, like, a black hat and everything. She's serious, bro.

She's serious, very serious. She's serious. She's serious. You just have to love guy chat. That's exactly how everyone is speaking behind the scenes, and you just have to love Joe Rogan for having the courage to just have a boy's chat publicly, which everyone's relating to and laughing to, except for Turning Point USA because this has been their PR strategy,

this bizarre strategy to go after the comedians for noticing, to go after people for noticing, for trying to entrap them into lawsuits by sending D-list debater bros who know nothing about the case for trying to investigate the case. I mean, it's backward. The best thing that they could have done would have been to say and do nothing for at least a year rather than partnering with Charlie's enemy,

saying that his friends were enemies and that his enemies were friends. None of this is making any sense, and we have now reached peak comedy with people now just leaning into it and mocking it, and somehow they continue to go after me as if I were not here, this conspiracy would somehow stop.

I'd like to remind everybody, I was the last to comment publicly about the strange behavior of Erica Kirk, And I only weighed in, beginning in December, when she went on to a press tour and explicitly shared something that was untrue. That the night before Charlie was not sending messages saying that he feared for his life. So we are to believe that Charlie did not share his fear with his wife at all. The night before, when she says he was just so excited to do what he's always done, so excited to go to UVU, he couldn't sleep. Maybe he couldn't sleep because he thought he was going to be killed.

that makes more sense to me I've never known Charlie to not sleep over a tour stop of a place that he's already been I just it just this is not a thing but maybe he down the line just became so excited about going to tour stops that he couldn't sleep and was eating in the middle of the night

it's not adding up anyway another video I want to show you yesterday I was telling you about this account at where forbidden if they are just brilliant. I mean, talk about somebody who has the creative force within them. They have dropped a new Erica Kirk video, and it might be my favorite. I don't know.

It's hard to tell. Take a listen. Erica? What are you doing out here? Shabbat Shalom. I choose you pickle pop. Positive evidence. Oh, you've got to be kidding me.

Positive evidence. Picklebuff, attack. Positive evidence, positive evidence. Picklepuff, do something. Positive evidence. This was a terrible investment. Positive evidence. Who's that Pokemon?

Shapiro. It's just absolutely brilliant stuff. Brilliant, brilliant, brilliant stuff. The comedy that is coming out right now, again, like I said, we have reached critical mass with this with this. So sending out these influencers and wasting money. It doesn't work. Just sit down, have a full conversation. I mean, it's just so easy. Like I said, there obviously, not just could be, there are likely a ton of things that we

have gotten wrong as we have pursued this investigation. And I'm saying when I say we am referring to all of the investigators, independent investigators, whether that be Nissy, Baron Coleman, Ian Carroll, you know, Coach Collin. Sure, I'm sure we have made some errors, but we did not make them knowingly and we wish to correct them if we did make them. The best way to solve this is to just sit down and be honest. You know, I actually taught a great lesson yesterday or last week in my debate when we turned Andrew Wilson by the end of it into a conspiracy theorist who thought that I was receiving text messages on my phone to remind me of what the charges were and then thought that I must have been receiving them through signal or through telegram. What did I do? At first thing I said,

here's my phone. If there's no conspiracy, there's no conspiracy. Transparency is the best way to debunk any and every conspiracy, if that's what you call them, alternative theories. I demonstrated that. You have nothing to hide. You have nothing to hide. So I don't understand why turning point won't engage in that by just sitting down and having Erica answer every possible question about what happened on that day, Andrew Colette, Blake Neff. Here's my phone. Here you go. This is what happened. here's where I was. We're not getting that. And the longer that it takes, and then when you choose to finally spread, share some daylight, you pick Andrew Wilson and you give him a text message never before seen. By the way, it's still never before seen because we haven't seen it. He's teasing it.

I can't wait. Not a little trap. I can't wait for that text message to be publicized. I'm so glad just even knowing that it exists that it was in Andrew's hand. That's already helpful for me. And we will take a brief break and I will come back and respond to some of your questions and comments. All right, you guys, I have to tell you about paleo valley beef sticks because my husband recently got back from his Catholic pilgrimage in Spain. And apparently they were an absolute hit, the unofficial snack of the trip. He packed them for himself, was handing them out along the way. And before long, everybody was asking for one. It sort of became this running joke while they were all walking.

Everybody was coming up to him saying, do you have another one? Honestly, I'm not surprised because they're one of those snacks that don't make you choose between healthy and delicious. Paleo Valley uses 100% grass-bedding grass-finished beef sourced from American family farms. But let's be honest, the reason that we keep buying them is because of the flavor. The original is the classic, but the jalapeno is my favorite because it has just the right amount of kick. And the terriacchi has the perfect amount of sweetness. They are savory, satisfying, and actually tastes like real food. I always keep a few of them in my bag, my car, and even in my carry-on because someone in my family is always hungry.

Clearly my husband is doing the same. So if you're looking for a clean, convenient protein snack but taste as good as it sounds, check out Paleo Valley beef sticks. Once you try them, you'll probably start keeping a stash in your bag as well. Right now, you can get 20% off your first order at paleovali.com.

Be sure to use code Candace at checkout. That's paleovalley.com using promo code Candace at checkout. I also want to remind you guys about American financing because everyday expenses keep climbing and high credit card interest is not making life any easier. If your budget is feeling squeezed lately, there's a smarter way to take back control. Your homeowner, your home equity is your best financial tool.

American finance can help you consolidate high-interest credit card debt so that you have some breathing room. Timing matters now more than ever, with a strong chance of an interest rate hike this September, waiting could cost you thousands. With the rates in the fives, there is no better time to find out how much you could be saving. Ditch those 20% interest rates by consolidating. You can slash your monthly obligations.

In fact, American financing borrowers save an average. average of $800 a month. Imagine that kind of cash flow could do for your family. There are zero upfront fees and you may even delay up the two mortgage payments. So lock in your lower rate before September, fall 800-795-1210. Again, that's 800-795-1210 or visit Americanfinancing.net. Atwens, again, that's Americanfinancing.net slash owens. Okay, top comment from yesterday's episode, top comments. There's three of them. Kay writes, somebody's comment said, If you play the Andrew Wilson debate at 1.75 speed, bro's foot turns into a fan. I actually have to do that. That is hilarious.

Nikki writes, paying someone $100,000 an hour to be humiliated is a rather expensive fetish. Indeed, it is. Trillion writes this debate is positive evidence that Turning Point USA has terrible PR. Overwhelmingly, I am overwhelmed that it is positive evidence that their PR strategy has just been an open-and-shut disaster. From start-to-fit-ish, it's unbelievable. They cannot stop blundering. Comments from today's episode, the one you feed, writes, Candace, please make sure that they did not do a BB and leave a bug in your house. First off, the zone that they were in is not a place that we are regularly other than when we actually film the show. And secondly,

of course, George has already had the house swept for bugs. That was like the first thing he did, especially when we learned the Stephen Creeper and crew were here. Alicia Switzer writes, Ian Carroll did a great reaction video six hours and it was great. Kudos to him for calling the BS as we all saw it and stopping to call it out. I can't wait to get my new second favorite shirt. Stay amazing. We will continue supporting you. Much love from Missouri.

I actually saw just clips of him and I've shared some of them and they're hilarious and I do want to when I have time this weekend watch his reaction video because so many people have said that it was absolutely amazing. So shout out to Ian Carroll for that. And yes, you can support us. We do have, this is my second favorite shirt available on the website, merch. We go to canis-oens.com, as we have learned, if you are going to commit a crime, please wear your second favorite shirt. So please wear this shirt in particular. Buy it, wear it, do crime, but be smart. Don't wear your favorite shirt because it's just not a good idea.

And of course, it is in Maroon. And we also have the shirts and the mugs from our debate. classic, I can explain to you, but I can't understand it for you. Amazingly, he is still asking questions. He does not comprehend, he does not comprehend hearsay. And the Crucible account is now getting fact checks, what do you call community notes on X? Because they're like, right here it says that they spoke to the mom. Look at this warrant, the probative cause, the probable cause warrant. And Twitter just had to come in and explain to him, no, this is not. This is not. a direct quotation from the mom. This is an officer that is signing a probable cause warrant.

He can't just, he's had days and he still cannot comprehend this. So we are really hoping that Andrew Wilson will be able to understand it. We are done explaining it. It is now on him and coming upon Andrew Wilson to do his best to sit down and understand why we are saying he is a hypocrite for allowing the courts to do what he says that we can't, which is to take a look at evidence and to infer upon it. He just doesn't get it, man. It's just not all there. James Gray writes, the fact that a woman hating man paid 300K to be dogwalked by a woman is insane. Congrats, Candace. You are a gentle woman and a scholar. Thank you. Thank you so much. Like I said, I am very proud of myself because I knew that it was turning points horse, even just them saying,

we have nothing to do with him. And then his opening statement, it just is incredible. It's like there's just not a brain cell split between Erica and Andrew Colbett. and Blake Neff. Like, obviously it's not a good idea. Like, give yourselves some plausible debility. T.J. Paluso writes, because I know people can be evil. I would like everybody as a homework assignment

to practice that in the mirror. I just, the way he did it was, it was compelling. Good performance. Didn't give me Denzel Washington, but I think that he put in a good effort. And I think my third one was good, like a little bit off to the side. Because people can be evil.

That's good. I'm warming up there. Black as Panther writes, reason Turning Point USA wanted Andrew to debate was to attempt to absolve Israel from any possible implications surrounding the case. Yeah, that was the obvious focus. Israel and Erica, which then puts a spotlight

in Israel and Erica because you don't want to debate the case, but you just want to say, but it's not Israel and Erica. Why can't they comprehend that? Why is everyone's social IQ so low as to not realize that if you keep pushing the, it's not Israel, though, right? It's not Israel. Then people go, maybe it's Israel.

It's weird. Why would he come in here wanting to talk about Israel? His opening statement, he starts talking about Israel. Why? This is just a weird thing for you to do. Look, if he had proven the debate claim, his debate claim that there was overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson did this, he would naturally then absolve Israel from any guilt. Well, he didn't want to do that. He wanted to absolve Israel from any guilt without having to prove his statement. Weird focus. Zammett writes, a burden bestowed on Candace Owens is a blessing to us all. That's very funny. Okay, I'll tell you one thing. It's just I don't like having to give out these punishments and sentencing people to more truth, but this is just the way things work in the court of law here in my court, my house, where I am the magistrate and I reign supreme.

You can't be doing that. You can't just be bringing people with just no. type of values, no type of decorum, people whose wives act like a Jerry Springer episode waiting to happen, like make you beg to bring Mori back on air. You just, it can't be like this turning point. You're scraping too hard at the bottom of that barrel right now. Anna writes, if the text said that he feared the left was going to take him out,

why would Joe Kent, why wouldn't Joe Kent need that message make it make sense? These people endlessly contradict themselves, keep going max, because they were relying on us to have a short memory. Of course, if he was handing messages over as he was, of people that Charlie felt threatened by or anything that could be significant, that would have been the first message that was handed over. And certainly they would have expressed it publicly that Charlie was fearful if the left was going to kill him the night before

and said they denied it for four months and then had Erica deny it on Glenn Beck or rather stayed mum on it for four months and then had Erica deny it on Glenn Beck. And then when it backfired, they were like, oh, no, there's messages, but like it says the left. Suspicious timeline, in my opinion. A lot to have an opinion.

Joey D. April writes, debate gate is worthy of its own spot in the official Kedis timeline. I'm going to put random things in the timeline now because I just know how angry they are about the timeline. Like, they're all just like, why is it in your timeline? How could you put this in your timeline?

I'm just going to be like, Candace went to Whole Foods, no evidence needed. Candice went to the farmer's market. Like, just put, we're going to start putting, just random little tricky stuff in the timeline and see who has a heart attack about it on X. It's my timeline. It's my timeline. So weird, strange reason to question me about my timeline, which I take great pride in. And I saw some people commenting going, Candace, I didn't even think this is like another level.

I had mentioned that I even organized my fridge. and that it says like, you know, sauces. I use my little maker and it says sauces and dairy and things in those side compartments. And then we have little turntable trays inside of the fridge. Yeah, go max. Organize. Get to the container store and do that.

Shout out to the suburban moms who just need it. When you have a lot of kids, you've got to be organized like this. Like, I organize their clothes. It's just so freeing. It feels so good to be organized. So I will be darned if anybody thinks that They're going to come from my timeline. I'm not going to stand up for myself.

Me and Ashley worked hard on that timeline, right, Ashley? Yes, we did. And we were pretty fired up. She almost came in from, things almost got physical when he addressed the timeline. But I kept my composure. Like I was, I was ready to knock him out. I'm going to be honest with you. I didn't do that.

Golf Mamie writes, Cadence, Cadence, thinking I meant to write, Candice. Golf Mommy, spelled M-A-M-I. Side note, I was listening to Kanye this weekend and came across the song stars. And I was expecting to hear, all right, you guys, my heart raced, L.O.L. You have good taste in music. Thank you very much. That is our intro. I wish he had made that a full song. It really is just an intro, which is unfortunate. But yes, I absolutely love Ye. I love just who he was and how hard he fought for himself. You know, I love the song Power, the different phases of his life and recognizing how much you have to fight for custody of your own soul once you make it. And that is

why I love the song Power so much, because I feel like I've gotten to a place where the they expect you to sell your soul, and I don't want to do that. Not to the highest bidder, not to anyone. And that has been the reason why I am focused on this case, because Charlie was my friend, and what has happened here is unacceptable, and what turning point has become is unacceptable. In my opinion. Anyway, you guys, we will see you tomorrow.