Cautionary Tales with Tim Harford - Office Hell: The Demise of the Playful Workspace (Classic)
Episode Date: August 8, 2025In the early 90s, cutting-edge advertising agency Chiat/Day announced a radical plan, aimed at giving the company a jolt of creative renewal. They would sweep away corner offices and cubicles and repl...ace them with zany open spaces, as well as innovative portable computers and phones. A brand new era of “hot-desking” had arrived. Problems quickly began. Disgruntled employees found themselves hauling temperamental, clunky laptops and armfuls of paperwork all over the office; some even had to use the trunks of their cars as filing cabinets. Soon, the unhappy nomads had had enough. Bad execution was to blame for the failure of this “playful” workspace. But Chiat/Day had made another mistake here, too – one that was more serious, more fundamental and altogether more common. For a full list of sources for this episode, go to timharford.com.See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
This is an IHeart podcast.
Run a business and not thinking about podcasting.
Think again.
More Americans listen to podcasts than ads supported streaming music from Spotify and Pandora.
And as the number one podcaster, IHearts twice as large as the next two combined.
Learn how podcasting can help your business.
Call 844-844-I-Hart.
Why are TSA rules so confusing?
You got a hood of you.
I'll take it all!
I'm Manny.
I'm Noah.
This is Devin.
And we're best friends and journalists with a new podcast called,
No Such Thing, where we get to the bottom of questions like that.
Why are you screaming?
I can't expect what to do.
Now, if the rule was the same, go off on me.
I deserve it.
You know, lock him up.
Listen to No Such Thing on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
No such thing.
Hello, Tim here, and we've got a classic episode of cautionary tales for you this week
while I'm on my summer holidays. Office hell, the demise of the playful workspace.
I hope you enjoy it, and if you do, maybe head over to Pushkin Plus,
because this Tuesday there'll be a brand new episode, another cautionary tale,
about a disastrous invention that shaped the office of today.
To subscribe, head to Pushkin Plus on the show page on Apple Podcasts,
or go to pushkin.fm slash plus.
As well as an exclusive show every month,
you also get all episodes ad-free.
Next week, here on the main feed,
we are back in action
with a brand new episode of Cautionary Tales
all about the worst poet in the world.
See you then.
By the end of the 1980s,
Shiat Day was the most fashionable advertising agency on the planet.
They'd commissioned a short film by the director of Blade Runner, Ridley Scott,
to launch the Apple Mac,
pioneered the idea of using Super Bowl spots to create news
and made an unforgettable series of adverts in which the Energizer Bunny
kept crashing through ads for other products.
But an ad agency always needs to keep things fresh.
And so, in 1993, the agency's boss, Jay Shiat, announced a radical.
plan. To give Shiat Day a jolt of creative renewal, Jay Shiat was going to sweep away
corner offices and cubicles and even desks. Armed with the best mobile technology that
1993 had to offer, Shiat Day employees would roam free in open spaces, winning sales and
creating great ads wherever they wished. What's more, these spaces would be playful,
zany and stylish.
Shiat hired the legendary architect, Frank Gehry, to work on the Los Angeles office,
which boasted a four-story sculpture of a pair of binoculars.
Carvaceous two-seater pods from fairground rides were installed with the hope that people would sit together in them and think creative thoughts.
The New York office was designed by Gaitano Pesche.
It had a mural of a vast, red pair of lips and a luminous, multicolored,
floor with pyroglyphs all over it.
Esche had a boyish sense of humour.
The floor in front of the men's room had an illustration of a man urinating.
His conference tables were made of a silicone resin that would amusingly grab and hold important
papers during important meetings.
Some of his chairs had, instead of feet, springs, and they would wobble and tip back.
Not so much fun if you happen to be wearing a skirt.
But hey, creativity, right?
From a distance, people loved the Shiat Day offices.
Design magazines raved about the futuristic spaces.
The agency even started charging to give paid tours of their offices.
The New York Times architecture critic called the Manhattan office
the apotheosis of the dream factory
and declared that the agency staff were happily at home inside the dream.
Time magazine added,
Thoroughly armed with a modern weaponry of the road warrior,
the telecommuters of Shiat Day are among the forerunners of employment in the information age.
That's not wrong.
Laptops and mobile phones, hot desks in zany offices,
Shiat Day really was ahead of its time.
But the closer you got to that cutting edge of workplace design,
the more likely you were to get hurt.
I'm Tim Harford, and you're listening to Cautionary Tales.
playful workspace seemed so brilliant.
Jay Shiat had been visionary in hiring Frank Gehry
a few years before he became the most famous architect on the planet.
Equally visionary was Shiat's idea that the office should be like a university campus.
The idea is you go to lectures, gather information,
but you do your work wherever you like, said Jay Shiat.
That idea is so influential.
that it's now a cliché.
Microsoft has a campus,
Pixar has a campus,
Google has a campus,
and many of the offices
which regard themselves as cool today
mimic Gaitano Pesche's bright colors,
different architectural zones,
and clusters of couches
interspersed with large tables.
Shiat Day's free-range office
really was ahead of its time.
But even before the full majesty
of the shiott day vision was unveiled,
problems started to emerge.
The agency had experimented
by removing a few people's desks
to see what would happen.
Unfortunately, when what happened,
happened, they didn't seem to care.
One of the guinea pigs
was an associate director called Monica Miller.
When they took her desk away,
she got hold of a little red wagon,
the classic children's toy.
She described to the journalist Warren Berger
how every morning
she'd pile the little red wagon high
with documents and files
then walk up and down
the hallways of shy at day
looking for a desk
left temporarily vacant
everyone thought it was so cute
she said
I'd be trudging down the hall
and they'd laugh and say
oh look here she comes with that little red wagon
it was like a bad dream
like a bad dream
well
the New York Times
did call it a dream factory.
The laugh would be on those mocking colleagues soon enough.
When they returned from their holiday break at the start of 1994,
the hot desking era had begun.
They were confronted with row upon row of lockers,
less college campus, more junior high school.
Jay Shiat had sneered dismissively that the lockers would be for people's
dog pictures or whatever.
But there wasn't room for much.
People started hauling armfuls of paperwork, along with their clunky laptops.
Monica Miller, of course, had her little red wagon.
Every day there'd be these frantic email messages like,
Has anybody seen my binder?
Does anyone know where my files are? she recalled.
It was a colossal headache.
Part of the problem was simply that Jay Shiat's cutting-edge idea
had been so badly executed.
Using a laptop and a portable phone seems mundane today.
But back in the early 1990s,
that sort of gear was expensive, temperamental and clunky.
Staff wouldn't take their phones or computers home.
Instead, they'd sign them out each morning
and return them to a concierge when they went home at night.
And to save money,
Shiat Day didn't buy enough
for all of the 150 staff.
who worked in the Manhattan office.
Instead, ill-tempered cues formed like breadlines each morning at the concierge desk.
Staff who lived near the office would show up at dawn, sign out a precious computer and phone,
hide them somewhere, and then go back to bed for a couple of hours.
Senior staff would enlist their assistants to rise early and secure their kit.
Damned if I was going to get up at six in the morning to get a phone,
recalled one, I had to put my foot down. I told my assistant, go in there at six in the
morning, get me a phone in a computer, and hide it till I get there. I'm not sure that's what
putting my foot down really means, but you get the gist. Rather than freeing people to work
anywhere and any time that suited them, Shiat Day's campus had staff queuing before daybreak
of basic equipment. In the Los Angeles office, people started using the trunks of their
cars as filing cabinets. They'd head out to the parking lot whenever they needed a new document.
Staff in the Manhattan office, of course, could only dream of using cars as filing cabinets.
The boss, Jay Shiat, seemed to be in denial about how much paper an advertising agency needed.
Paper was something he frowned on. He'd send emails around, reminding staff that Shiat Day was a
paperless office.
One creative director remembers Jay mocking the paper storyboards
and demanding the removal of posters showing the agency's latest ads.
But the truth was that paper was still an essential part of the creative flow.
That was doubly true at an organisation where people had to queue in the hope of scoring a laptop for the day.
Who would switch to digital in a world where they couldn't even be sure of getting a computer?
The execution of Shiat Day's new office was disastrously bad,
making false economies with clunky equipment.
But J. Shiat made another mistake,
one that was more serious, more fundamental,
and much, much more common.
But he wasn't the first, not by a long way.
A century ago, a French industrialist,
Henri Fruges commissioned a rising star in the field of architecture to design some radical
new homes for factory workers in Pesac near Bordeaux. The architect's name was Charles
Edouin-Generé Gris. Today, we know him as Le Corbusier. The Cobusier designed Cite
Fruges to Pesacac, a set of modern cubes stacked into family homes. The Cobusier, of course,
was the arch-modernist,
a man who dealt in minimalism and concrete.
His vision couldn't be more opposed to the spring-loaded chairs
or four-story sculptures of binoculars
that adorned the offices of Shiat Day.
One creative director of Shiat Day
described the experience of working in Gaitano Pesche's radical office
as like sitting inside of a migraine.
How he must have yearned for the peasant.
haired-down minimalism of Le Corbusier.
We are tired of decor.
What we need is a good visual laxative,
Lecobusier once explained.
Bare walls, total simplicity.
That is how to restore our visual sense.
And yet, the humble factory workers
didn't seem to see Le Corbusier's vision quite like that.
They hated it, and they refused to move in.
It was terrible.
said one, I felt as if I was being sent to prison.
If you focus on the design, this seems paradoxical.
Gary and Pesche and Jay Shiat were offering the workforce
a playfully riotous explosion of visual stimulation.
Henri Fugès and Le Coulouseier were offering the workforce bare walls
and total simplicity.
The design ideas were radically different.
The reaction was the same.
People hated it.
Cautionary tales will return after the break.
Imagine that you're on an airplane and all of a sudden you hear this.
Attention passengers.
The pilot is having an emergency and we need someone, anyone, to last.
think you could do it? It turns out that nearly 50% of men think that they could land the plane
with the help of air traffic control. And they're saying like, okay, pull this. Do this, pull that,
turn this. It's just, I can do my eyes close. I'm Manny. I'm Noah. This is Devin. And on our new show,
no such thing, we get to the bottom of questions like these. Join us as we talk to the leading
expert on overconfidence. Those who lack expertise, lack the expertise they need to
recognize that they lack expertise.
And then, as we try the whole thing out for real.
Wait, what?
Oh, that's the run right.
I'm looking at this thing.
Listen to no such thing on the IHeart Radio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
In 2010, two psychologists at the University of Exeter,
Alex Haslam and Craig Knight,
conducted an experiment to test the impact of different office spaces
on how much people got done and how they felt about it.
Haslam and Knight recruited experimental subjects
to spend an hour on administrative tasks such as checking documents
and randomly assigned these subjects to different kinds of office.
There were four office layouts in the experiment.
First was the minimalist office,
a clean and Spartan space
with a bare desk, swivel chair, pencil and paper.
Many people in Haslam and Knight's experiments
found the sheer tidiness of the minimalist office oppressive.
It just felt like a show space with nothing out of place,
commented one participant, adding,
you couldn't relax in it.
The second office layout was decorated.
Nothing radical.
No binocular sculptures or fair.
foreground pods, it was just the simple minimalist office with a few tasteful additions,
some potted plants, some large framed prints hanging on the wall.
The prints showed close-up photographs of plants, vaguely evoking a Georgia Oak Heath
painting. All simple enough, but people liked it. In the experiment, workers preferred the
decorated office space to the minimalist one, and they got more and better work done there, too.
But this experiment wasn't really about the effect of having some greenery or a few pictures on the wall.
What really interested Haslam and Knight wasn't pot plants.
It was power.
And so the final two office layouts used the same components as the decorated office.
Visually, they seemed much the same.
But there was an invisible distinction, something that made all the difference between a pleasant space
and a hellhole.
That invisible distinction was all about autonomy.
The most successful office space offered the same tasteful prints
and the same little shrubs, but it offered something else too.
Control over the space.
Participants were invited to spend some time arranging those decorations
however they saw fit,
or even having them removed to perfectly mimic the minimalist space
if that's what they wanted.
The researchers called this arrangement the empowered office.
The empowered office could be just like the minimalist office,
or exactly like the decorated office, or it could be something else.
The point was that the person working in the office had the choice.
The empowered office was a great success.
People got much more done there than either the minimalist or the decorated office
and they liked it more too.
And you can guess what Alex Haslam and Craig Knight did to produce a hated environment.
They simply said they were offering people control and then took the control away.
They invited people to arrange the prints and the plants,
but then at the last minute, a researcher returned and undid all that personalisation,
instead setting everything up as it was in the decorated office.
If they were questioned or challenged, they simply said that the previous arrangement
hadn't been suitable for the experiment.
The scientists called this condition the disempowered office.
People loathed it.
I wanted to hit you, one participant told the researchers later
after the experiment had been explained.
Several people felt physically unwell.
And remember, there was nothing actually wrong
with the physical design of the disempowered office.
it was exactly like the decorated office
which people had found perfectly pleasant.
What mattered was the sense of powerlessness,
of implicitly being told that you'd done it wrong,
that you weren't in charge, that you didn't matter.
The lesson, office design doesn't matter nearly as much
as letting people design their offices.
And this explains why the simple, clean homes that Henri Fruges commissioned for his workforce
met with much the same revulsion as the crazy, chaotic workspace that Jay Shiat commissioned for his.
It wasn't a response to the aesthetics themselves.
It was a response to being powerless, as those aesthetics were imposed by an over-confident employer.
As one of Jay Shiat's deputies recalled,
Jay didn't listen to anybody.
He just did it.
But this study doesn't tell us everything
about why Jay Shiat's experiment failed.
The scientists looked only at how office aesthetics
affected a worker's productivity on an administrative task.
And people didn't just do admin at Shiat Day.
They came up with creative ideas.
When Gaetano Pesche and Jay Shiat swept away the cubicle farms and the office doors,
they were trying to stimulate a certain kind of serendipitous, imaginative way of working together.
Pesche thought that office doors and cubicle walls were just barriers to that creative teamwork.
You don't need the office, he recalled in an interview with the Planet Money podcast.
His vision was different.
somewhere that would encourage collaborative chats.
It was an open space with a lot of corners, with a sofa, comfortable chair,
with a coffee shop, because I think people, when they meet, they like to have a drink.
You can see the logic.
A coffee shop is just the kind of place where you might serendipitously bump into a random colleague
and unexpectedly have a creative conversation.
But sometimes, you just want some peace and quiet.
You felt totally exposed, recalled one executive at Cheyette Day.
There would be six conversations going on around you.
I'd try to think, and I couldn't.
We were the laughing stock of the industry.
It was weird, you just had no idea where you should go.
There was a rush for the only enclosed spaces in the place.
The meeting rooms.
The rooms would quickly fill up with people
and then they'd say to everyone else,
get out, this is mine!
And what about when you wanted to talk to someone in particular
and you just couldn't find them?
When the journalist Warren Berger wrote an epic magazine feature
about the Shiat Day experiment,
he titled it, Lost in Space.
I can remember coming back from a presentation
and being unable to find it,
my creative department for two days, complained one creative director.
Another developed what he called the three-time-around rule.
If he walked around the entire office three times
and he still couldn't find the person he wanted,
he'd walk back to the concierge,
hand back his laptop and his phone, and go home.
And if someone needed me, they could find me on my virtual couch.
It's hard to bump into random colleagues
when everyone's given up and gone home
and that's a problem
because Shiat and Pesche weren't wrong
about the need for personal proximity
to spark creative conversations.
Back in the 1970s,
a management professor named Thomas Allen
measured how communication between workers
dropped off exponentially
as their desks were further and further away from each other.
Fifty yards apart, and it was like they were in different states.
Different floors or buildings, they might as well have been different planets.
Let's leave Jay Shiat's unhappy nomads behind for a while
and travel forward in time, five or six years, to another employer
with a strong aesthetic sensibility.
a clear sense that he was right about everything
and a creative, collaborative office space to design.
He needs no introduction,
because Steve Jobs is one of the most famous entrepreneurs in history.
He was the force behind the Apple Mac, the iPhone, those little round glasses.
But for our purposes, he was the force behind the headquarters of Pixar.
the animation studio that's produced films from Toy Story to Wally.
Steve Jobs was a man who hated ugliness
and demanded beauty everywhere he looked.
In Walter Isaacson's biography of Steve Jobs,
one of the saddest and most eloquent stories describes Jobs
semi-conscious after receiving a liver transplant,
ripping off his oxygen mask because it was ugly,
and demanding that the medical team bring him
him five alternative designs so that he could pick the best.
In happier times, he had much more to say about Pixar's headquarters.
The construction budget was almost unlimited, and the building, set in Emoryville near Oakland
and San Francisco, was crafted in an industrial style, full of exposed steel, wood and brick,
with jobs obsessing over every detail.
He poured over samples of steel from across the country
and selected a particular steel mill in Arkansas
which he judged to have the best colour and texture.
He insisted that the girders were bolted rather than welded
and the bolts were designed with circular caps to look like rivets,
even though rivets hadn't been much used for half a century.
Jobs commissioned a brick manufacturer from Washington State
and told them to precisely match the bricks
on the Hills Brothers Coffee Plant
across the bay on the San Francisco waterfront.
Then Jobs kept sending back samples
insisting they didn't match the exact colour palette he had in mind
until the manufacturer threatened to quit.
Steve Jobs was one of a kind.
But when it came to dictating
how his underling's office spaces should look,
you can draw a direct,
line from Henri Fugges and Le Corbusier through Cheyette, Gary and Peche to Steve Jobs
at Pixar.
And Steve Jobs didn't limit himself to the patina on the steels and the pallet of the bricks.
Like Jay Chiat and Gaitano Pesche, Jobs had become fascinated by the idea of random meetings,
sparking creative conversations.
Pixar's president, Ed Catmull, explained,
Steve had this firm belief that the right kind of building can do great things for a culture.
Steve wanted the building to support our work by enhancing our ability to collaborate.
Jobs hit upon a plan.
Pixar's headquarters should have just a single pair of large restrooms off the main lobby.
People would make new connections or revive old ones
because everybody would have to head to the lobby,
brought together by a shared human need to urinate.
It starts with the most benevolent aims, doesn't it?
One moment, you're trying to make a place that looks elegant and beautiful.
The next, you're trying to control people by manipulating their bladders.
The road to office hell is paved with precisely the right colour palette of good intentions.
Cautionary tales will return.
in a moment.
Imagine that you're on an airplane
and all of a sudden you hear this.
Attention passengers, the pilot is having an emergency
and we need someone, anyone, to land this plane.
Think you could do it?
It turns out that nearly 50% of men
think that they could land the plane
with the help of air traffic control.
And they're saying like, okay, pull this, and so this.
Do this, pull that, turn this.
It's just, I can do it my eyes close.
I'm Mani.
I'm Noah.
This is Devin.
And on our new show, no such thing, we get to the bottom of questions like these.
Join us as we talk to the leading expert on overconfidence.
Those who lack expertise lack the expertise they need to recognize that they lack expertise.
And then, as we try the whole thing out for real.
Wait, what?
Oh, that's the run right.
I'm looking at this thing.
Listen to no such thing on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Le Corbusier had demanded a visual laxative, with bare walls and total simplicity.
The eventual residents of Pesac did not agree.
They added old-fashioned shutters and windows.
They erected pitched roofs over the flat ones.
They put up flowery wallpaper over the wallpaper over the wall.
the uninterrupted monochrome walls and marked out little blocks of garden with wooden picket fences.
Their gardens were decorated with gnomes.
I can't imagine anything that Steve Jobs would have hated more than a garden gnome.
Like Pacek's residents, Jay Shiat's employees gradually began to chip away at the purity of his vision.
They figured out a system where you could sign up in a business.
advance to reserve a particular place.
Rather than queuing each morning for laptops and phones,
they'd store them overnight in their lockers.
Makeshift desks started to appear,
and before long, desktop computers too.
Shiat Day's dream factory, like Le Corbusier's Pesac,
was steadily being retrofitted by the people who had to live with it every day.
These 20th century cautionary tales feel to me like they have lessons to teach us
about work life in the 2020s.
On one hand, knowledge workers are finally equipped with genuinely portable computing technology,
the kind of thing that might actually make a functional workspace out of Gaitano Pesche's
cool sofas, hot desks, and nowhere to put your dog pictures.
On the other hand, this technology means we can.
easily work from home during the pandemic, and much of the office workforce has since been
in no rush to get back to the office. In the United States, for example, nearly half of all paid
working days in 2021 were worked from home, and that figure barely shifted as effective vaccines
were made available to everyone who wanted them. Instead of eagerly returning to their creative
office spaces to boldly strut from one collaborative huddle to another, people preferred to stay at
home.
Homeworking isn't always fun, writing emails on a laptop while perched on a bed or trying to stop
the kids from crying during a client meeting.
But many people noticed one thing that more than makes up for all these strains and sorrows.
At home, nobody complains if you leave your dog.
pictures on your desk. People got a taste of control over their own space, and they didn't want
to give it up. In surveys, one of the leading reasons that people give for working from home
is the autonomy. Alex Haslam and Craig Knight could have predicted that. It is no small thing
to be the undisputed boss of your own desk. But that's a problem for serendipity.
is fine for the meetings we plan, but it's hopeless at facilitating chance encounters with
colleagues we don't know so well. A large study at Microsoft during the first wave of the pandemic
found that virtual workers tended to connect only to people they'd already been close to. And when
we need to urinate, we're going to feel something very far from serendipitous to light
if we bump into a random co-worker outside our own bathroom door.
When Steve Jobs got an important idea in his head, it wasn't easy to dissuade him.
His plan to impose a single pair of serendipity-inducing mega-bathrooms on Pixar
seemed to be a very important idea indeed.
Proximity mattered, thought Jobs.
And he was right.
And what better way to ensure that different people from different departments
spent some time in close proximity
than by forcing them all to go through the atrium several times a day
at intervals governed by the call of nature?
He felt that very, very strongly, says Pam Kerwin,
Pixar's general manager.
So Jobs explained his idea to Pixar staff at an off-site meeting
and the staff didn't like it at all.
As Kerwin recalls,
one pregnant woman said she shouldn't be forced to walk for 10 minutes
just to go to the bathroom,
and that led to a big fight.
Some senior Pixar staff stood up for the pregnant woman.
Jobs was frustrated.
People just didn't understand the vision.
They didn't get it.
But then Jobs did something extraordinary and out of character.
He compromised.
The Steve Jobs building contains not one, but four pairs of bathrooms.
There is still plenty of opportunity for serendipity,
thanks to an atrium that focuses activity with the main doors of the building,
a cafe, a game area, the mailboxes, three theatres, conference rooms,
and screening rooms all spilling into it.
Pixar's bosses said that Jobs' basic incentives,
instincts had been correct.
I kept running into people I hadn't seen for months.
I've never seen a building that promoted collaboration and creativity as well as this one.
People encountered each other all day long, inadvertently.
You felt the energy in the building.
No doubt that's true.
But the serendipity at Pixar wasn't just down to Steve Jobs' ideas,
but to his willingness to let them go.
Junior staff were able to stand up to Steve Jobs, the owner, the legend,
the control freak's control freak, and get their own way about something that mattered to them.
That was more important than all the bolted steel and elegant brickwork Pixar's success could buy.
Inside Jobs' beautiful building, the Pixar staff ran Ryman.
The most famous example is a concealed room that can be reached only through a crawlway
in which was originally designed merely to provide access to the air conditioning valves.
Once a Pixar animator discovered the secret panel into the space,
he installed Christmas lights, lava lamps, animal print furnishings,
a cocktail table, a bar, and napkins printed up with the logo, The Love Lounge.
The animators who work here are free to, no, encouraged to,
decorate their workspaces in whatever style they wish,
explained the Pixar boss, Ed Catmull.
They spend their days inside pink dollhouses
whose ceilings are hung with miniature chandeliers,
tiki huts made of real bamboo,
and castles whose meticulously painted 15-foot-high styrofoam turrets
appeared to be carved from stone.
Steve Jobs, apparently, hated all that juvenile mess.
But he let it happen.
And the serendipity he craved became a daily feature of life at Pixar,
even if not precisely as set out in his original blueprint.
Steve Jobs wanted to create an office space
that would still be beautiful and functional in a century.
We'll have to wait a while to know whether he succeeded.
All we know is that Jay Shiat did not.
He sold his company to a bigger advertising conglomerate,
helped perhaps by all the attention that had been lavished on his radical office space.
Yet neither the Gehry offices in Los Angeles nor the riotous Gaetano Peshae offices in Manhattan
survived the merger for long.
The entire experiment had lasted just a few years.
Jay Shiat declared that it was the only thing I ever did in business
that I was satisfied with.
Very few of his colleagues seemed to agree.
And while the giant binocular sculpture remains in Los Angeles,
the interior designs are long gone.
In contrast, Le Corbusier's modernist homes for workers at Pesac did last a century.
Pesac is now viewed as something of an architectural destination.
It's full of people with money and modernist tastes.
People who love Le Corbusier's visual laxative,
even though they're very far from being the kind of people Pesac was designed for.
Long after Le Corbusier himself had died,
these new residents cleared away the picket fences and the pitched roofs and the garden gnomes
and restored the purity and simplicity of his original vision.
But I don't think it's a coincidence that that vision withered when it was imposed on workers
and blossom when people who loved it got to choose.
As the pandemic receded, and bosses started to worry that working from home was undermining workplace serendipity,
many decided to mandate a return to the office.
But maybe they should instead try harder to create the kind of office that workers will freely choose to come into.
Maybe the principle for a flourishing creative space is that if we build it, they will come.
provided we don't try too hard to control what happens there.
The Kubusier himself might have agreed.
When he was told about the garden gnomes of Pesak,
he said something that I wish all the tasteful, powerful people like Jay Shiat could understand.
You know, life is always right.
It is the architect who is wrong.
For a full list of our sources, please see the show notes at Tim Harford.com.
Cautionary Tales is written by me, Tim Harford, with Andrew Wright.
It's produced by Alice Fines, with support from Edith Russelo.
The sound design and original music is the work of Pascal Wise.
The show wouldn't have been possible without the work of Jacob Weisberg,
Ryan Dilley, Julia Barton, Greta Cohn, Littal Malad, John Schnars,
Carly Mugliore, Eric Sandler, Maggie Taylor, Nicole Murano and Morgan Ratner.
Cautionary Tales is a production of Pushkin Industries.
If you like the show, please remember to share, rate and review.
It helps us for, you know, mysterious reasons.
And if you want to hear the show ad-free, sign up for Pushkin Plus on the show page
in Apple Podcasts or at Pushkin.
www.fm slash plus.
Why are TSA rules so confusing?
at all. I'm Mani. I'm Noah.
This is Devin. And we're best friends and journalists with a new podcast called No Such Thing,
where we get to the bottom of questions like that. Why are you screaming? I can't expect
what to do. Now, if the rule was the same, go off on me. I deserve it. You know, lock him up.
Listen to No Such Thing on the IHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your
podcast. No such thing.
This is an IHeart podcast.
Thank you.