Chewing the Fat with Jeff Fisher - Ep 111 | Cleaning Robbers, AI Driving & What Is God's Name? | Guest: Quentin Brogdon
Episode Date: May 28, 2019In a world where theft is a growing trend, one type of robber has Jeffy wanting them to come to his house next. Attorney Quentin Brogdon joins the show to talk about the future of AI driving and one m...an claims to know God's name! Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hopefully, this is something that's going to happen around the country.
It started in Massachusetts.
A father came home to a sparkling, clean house.
He said he knew something was wrong when he and his son returned to their home.
The five-year-old noticed the back door was ajar.
He was worried someone was still inside.
But instead, an intruder who left the smell of cleaning supplies still in the air
and cleaned every room
except the kitchen
immaculately clean.
If this person would like to break into my home,
call me.
8-8-903-33.
Or you can direct message me on Twitter
at Jeffrey JFR.
You can even message me on Facebook,
Jeff Fisher Radio,
and let me know when you're going to be in the neighborhood.
And I'll leave the doors unlocked for you.
Just come on in and clean away.
Invicted and is now in prison is complaining.
He's complaining that earlier this month,
he'd been forced to shove toilet paper in his ears
to mask the din of prison
and had nothing but an indoor exercise bike
to maintain his physique.
You know him as El Chapo.
He goes by
Joaquin Achivaldo
Guzman Loera
is complaining
and he wants some outdoor activity
created for him in prison
the judge
said hey
El Chapo
or probably called it by his real name
the judge said hey
Joaquin Achivaldo
Guzman Loera
I think you're just whining about it
and you're probably just trying to use this
as an elaborate ruse to escape
this prison.
So,
so,
tough.
Live with what you've got.
Okay, I thought
we were supposed to be, you know,
caring people over prisoners.
Yeah, but we don't care about
Joaquina Chibado Gousman,
no way that.
Now, he's only,
he's only successfully planned
and executed escapes from
two high security penal,
penal institutions.
So, I mean, that's it.
You think, you think he'd do it a third time?
Yes.
I think so too.
Really, I had to shove toilet paper.
I need earplugs and...
Well, I feel like we can afford earplugs.
You don't know.
You might be able to dig a tunnel with earplugs or something.
Earplugs are pretty tough, aren't they?
No.
Under like foam?
Well, those type, but those aren't good enough for...
Pluacin, Achivaldo, Guzman.
Yeah, they're not good enough for El Chapo.
You've got to have, you know, you got to have professionally made earplugs.
plugs.
Like the ones that you have?
Yeah.
Yeah.
So they could, you know, mask the din of prison.
I don't know if our man...
Joaquin Achivalal-Gusman Loera.
Realizes, but part of being in prison is hearing the din of prison.
That's part of the deal.
Thank you.
And on top of which, like, I know I've seen pictures of...
Joaquin Achivalogus man Loewera
And you know
I know that we found him in a hotel room
With one of his hookers
I mean it might have been his wife
But you know whatever one of his hookers
We all know he married a hooker
And he's got like four or five wives
Right they all know where they he hid money
In different houses with each wife
With each wife
What else are you supposed to do with your money, Jeffrey?
Thank you
Thank you
But I never thought of
El Chapo I'm sorry
Joaquin Achia
Lucas Manlovera.
As a physique to maintain.
He doesn't look like the type of guy that maintains his physique.
Are you sure?
I could be wrong.
I could be wrong.
Because his nickname El Chapo means shorty.
So to get over that, I guess maybe he cares about his physique.
Yeah, he's 5-6, 201 pounds.
He needs to keep that up.
I mean, I don't want to mess with the man.
And I tend to agree with this.
judge right um and he's 62 how much weight can you gain a 62 oh a lot really oh yeah your first
62 how many how many pounds did you gain because you're by the third 62 right now right that's correct
and yeah the first 62 man goes by so fast and you realize holy cow i'm 65 and i've gained another
hundred and one pounds so at 62 were you 201 pounds or more i was more than 2001 pounds in fact
I was almost born more than 201 pounds.
Oh, so by the age of three, you're already at 200?
200 pounds is like, nothing.
Please.
If I were to, if I were, if I had any point in my life right now,
weighed in at 201 pounds, you would say, is he sick?
Yeah, I can see that.
Is he sick?
Does he have some sort of disease?
And last week I told you that.
When you were filling in for Glenn, I told you.
you that you look at you lie some way because that TV was in your favor good well I have I mean I've
lost about 25 almost 30 pounds and you know it's coming in good but that's still uh I got news for you
and ain't close to 201 pounds that just is not happening in Florida a new bill aimed at the
production and sale of childlike sex dolls has been signed into law it takes a
effect October 1st.
It makes it illegal to possess, give away, sell, or displaying a childlike sex doll.
Guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty.
Boy, you aren't kidding.
This is a strange one for me because you want to say, yeah, yeah, good, good.
you know you want to say you don't want this
but when you start talking about
careful
it's a fine line baby
careful
let me say good for the governor of Florida
good for the governor of Florida
that's good
good for the governor of Florida
yeah good for the governor
of Florida
speaking of states that
you know, you look at and go, wow, that's weird.
Not that Florida is that.
But California is.
And I don't know if we talked about this last week or not,
but Beverly Hills banned the sale of tobacco products.
Amazing.
Coming from where the birth of Hollywood.
I mean, that's it, man, Beverly Hills, California.
People are living in Beverly Hills, smoking in movies, smoking in shows.
And they are banning tobacco products within the city limits.
Not 100% though.
Well, look, we don't want people out in the streets smoking those nasty cigarettes.
But we've got high-end cigar lounges where some of our big stars hang out.
And we've got them.
It's legal there.
We're not going to shut them down.
Oh.
One more quick one.
Um, yeah, they're not going to close these places down.
Uh, you know, Schwarzenegger.
All the other hoity toys that smoke cigars,
and I'm sure that the other hoity toys that smoke cigarettes will be smoking in the cigar bars,
there's cigarettes.
We can't shut these places down.
Sorry.
Look, the band's going to, I mean, at gas stations, those are low-lives.
Convenience to pharmacies and grocery stores.
You know, where the workers go for us to do stuff,
filling up our cars and, you know, picking up our little convenience store items
and picking up our prescriptions and going to the grocery store for our food.
We don't want those people smoking in public.
But while they're doing that for us, we're going to be at the cigar bar doing what we do best.
Keep doing this bin.
I'm going to want to start smoking again.
Congratulations to McKenzie Bezos, too.
She is wonderful, and she's done a wonderful thing.
Now that she's worth about $35 billion.
And I love the stories now are, uh, McKenzie.
Bezos, the author, shut up.
Author?
Yeah, she's authored a couple of bestselling books.
She's when?
She did that.
I don't know.
She threw them up on Amazon and people went, oh, that's Jeff's wife.
We're going to buy those.
I mean, I don't want to throw, I don't want to say that she's not worthy of being an author.
In fact, we ought to look up to see what book she's written because I don't remember.
McKenzie Phillips off.
Here's another theory.
I don't know.
The husband owned Amazon.
son, can he fudge those numbers?
Be like, oh, honey, you made the list, baby.
You made the list.
Oh, my gosh.
Look at that.
You made the list, baby.
Congratulations.
Okay, so she's books by McKenzie Bezos.
Traps.
And the testing of Luther Albright.
She was close.
She should put Tramp.
And that would have been, you know, about her.
I mean, are you kidding me?
These two books, they're calling them bestselling authors?
Okay, well, let's look at Tram.
What's traps?
Trabs.
You can get it for 469, though.
Oh, it's on the discount.
You can get a hardcover, 469.
Conditioned like new.
So you can't even buy it from the printer?
Reclusive movie star, Jessica Lessing,
is finally coming out of hiding to confront her father-a-com
and has been selling her out of,
out to the paparazzi for years.
On her four-day road trip to Las Vegas,
she encounters three unexpected allies,
Vivian, a teenager with newborn twins,
Lynn, a dog shelter owner living in isolation on a ranch in rural Nevada, and Dana, a fearless
ex-military bodyguard, wrestling with secrets of her own.
As their fates collide, oh, wait, read more, hold on.
As their fates collide, each woman will find a chance at redemption that she never would have thought possible.
Mackenzie Bezos taught pros, tough characters, and nuanced insights.
Give this novel a complexity of that few thrillers can match.
Have we seen the thriller on TV or movies yet?
At least I'm some prime original.
No, we have not.
Anyway, author of McKenzie Bezos.
Stop it.
All right, so she's signed a giving pledge, and good for her.
A commitment to donate more than half of her almost $37 billion in assets to charity.
I'd like to introduce myself to McKenzie.
My name is Charity.
And if you're willing to donate to me.
name or is that oh that's my name that's my name oh your name you can call me look a lot of people
call me jeffy but your real name legal legal legal legal yeah charity charity yeah so just charity oh like
chair yeah it's like chair madonna okay okay you know that's me charity and uh if you know McKenzie
look if you're looking at a place to you know drop a few bucks I'm here for you I mean I am
the charity you're saying you're going to give to can you reread what she's going to do it she's
She signed a pledge to give?
She did.
She joined the philanthropic effort known as the giving pledge in which participants.
Yeah, so she's not going to give it.
Just let you know.
That means she's not going to give it.
No, participants promise to give away more than half their wealth during their lifetime.
You know what?
Or in their will.
I'm going to say this, Jeffrey.
Me and you should do it too.
Signed the pledge.
Signed a pledge.
So we make it on the list?
Make it on the list.
Because that pledge, you know, we'll do an official announcement.
and our PR team will send it out
because I feel like she has moved me to also pledge
we have to do that we're doing that that's part
the chewing the fat program
is going to be signing the giving pledge
there is we have to make it like signing giving pledge
we'll give half of our what is it we have to give half of our wealth
half of our wealth and it'll be either now or when we die
or you have to do it when you're alive or your will
Oh, my will. I'll make sure I tell my will lawyer that's named Will to put this on the will.
Because I mean, we have Warren Buffett and Bill Gates's signed.
We need to give. How much are they given? How much are they given?
Half of their wealth, right?
Okay, so me and you.
I think Zuckerberg, I think Buffett and Gates signed the pledge saying they were going to do it all, right?
Well, that's fine. They could do it all. But between me and you, you give your half, I give my half, that's a whole. Boom.
What I like about it is that, you know, hey, Jeff pray.
his ex-wife on Tuesday for her giving pledge commitment.
Side note, Jeff Bezos has not signed the giving pledge.
Absolutely not.
No way.
Absolutely not.
Jeff, I love my wife for that.
Good for her.
Oh, he said that?
Yeah, no, he gave her, he said he was all in love with his wife's giving pledge commitment.
Yeah, because it's a fake giving pledge.
She's not going to really do it.
It's going to be amazing and thoughtful and effective.
and I'm proud of her.
Their letter is so beautiful.
Go get him, Mackenzie.
That check is going to bounce so hard.
Please,
McKenzie,
charity,
me.
That's me.
It just write the check to me.
You don't have to be half.
You've got, what,
37 billion.
You're one of the richest females.
I'll take a billion.
Just, you know, whatever.
Just a couple million.
Just to make yourself feel good.
Okay, that's fine.
Just to make yourself feel good.
And then I promise,
that I will sign the pledge.
In fact, I'll sign the pledge prior to you giving me money.
Oh, that's a good one.
And so that you know that your money is being put to good use.
So the money that I make from your money will also be going to the giving pledge and we'll, you know,
just pay it forward.
It's a good way for you to pay it forward.
We're doing that.
We are doing that and we are letting her know that we're doing that because I want some
money from her.
And Jeff Bezos, you know, still the richest man in the world, by the way.
He has not signed it.
He's all happy.
I'll let those guys do it, but, you know, I'm not, I'm not signing that.
You never know how many girlfriends I might have until I die.
All right, let's go over to the break room, see what's happening in the break room.
I need to drink a Coca-Cola zero sugar as it is anyway.
Oh, my gosh.
That's so good.
So, last week, we told you about the story where the United States Postal Service is starting to have their delivery vehicles done without.
drivers. They're going to do it autonomous. They're going to drive. They're going to start
doing it from Phoenix to Dallas. And there were several stories printed that were,
well, not necessarily against it, but like, what are you guys doing? Now, in the story,
it talked about the Postal Service saying that they were going to have several people
as part of the experiment in the beginning to, you know, do the ride along. But as we're finding out,
we are moving fast.
I mean,
we're seeing stories
where robots are delivering things to us
on a daily basis.
Drones are,
we've already okayed drones in some cities
and it'll be coming to a city near you soon
to deliver things.
And our roadways are starting to become
less safe with robot driving cars.
But is it the robot that's less safe
or is it because the humans are still driving?
I would almost argue that it's the humans that are causing the problem and not the robots.
But that having been said it, no, I don't own stock in Tesla.
That having been said, or I should run the Postal Service, though, and we've been down that road before.
Quentin Bogdan, attorney-in-law.
Do you have your shingle hanging outside the office, which is Esquire?
No, I don't use the term Esquire, Jeff.
Thanks for having me on today.
You're welcome.
Quentin, joining us in the break.
room today. You have a couple of, take us where your thoughts are in the, the autonomous vehicle
on the road today, where we're at. I mean, are we already facing huge lawsuits? I mean,
you brought up a couple things off the air and I thought, well, is that really what we're talking
about? Airbags. But it is, really, because these are systems in our automobiles that are working
out of our control. Right. That's right, Jeff. The automation of our autoers. We're not. The automation of our
automobiles has been going on a lot longer than most of us realize. We've had anti-lock brakes in the 70s,
electronic stability control. It would selectively apply the brakes to your wheels, keep control of your
car if you're about to roll over, driving through water, automated parallel parking, forward collision
avoidance systems. And our cars already are basically miniature computers. We've gotten to that
point already. But now in the last five to ten years, we're in the full-blown age of
autonomous vehicles, what many refer to as AVs, autonomous vehicles. And that age isn't coming here
one day. It's here now. And we've already started to see some crashes of these vehicles. And the
NTSB and others have done investigations. There have been studies of them. And we're starting to see
certain trends. And you're right. A lot of it is the human driver, specifically how the human
driver interacts with this new technology. It's still an open question whether the design
designers and manufacturers of these systems are up to the challenge of keeping the human driver
vigilant and engaged because today the systems aren't completely autonomous.
And so, for instance, in a Tesla, Tesla's position is in the fine print, some would argue.
Stay alert.
Stay alert.
Right.
We're here to help.
It will beep at you.
But cynics and critics point out the system is marketed as autopilot.
Sure is.
And to be fair, if I were in it.
I would think that it is.
You know, I want it to be.
That's right.
I want to push home and not worry about it anymore.
So part of it is human drivers and anybody who sat in a hospital and heard the alarms beeping at the nurses
and seeing the nurses walk by them and ignore them knows just because your Tesla or a car is beeping
at you put your hands back on the wheels doesn't mean that human beings won't start tuning that out as white noise.
Right.
So that's an issue.
Right, we do that.
But we know these crash because they don't always see well and they don't always think well, these autonomous vehicles.
They use a series of sensors.
They use GPS, which some people think that alone can steer these cars.
It cannot.
It's only accurate to within one to two feet.
So they need LIDAR, light waves.
They need sonar, sound waves, and they need ultrasound.
I had that right.
So all of those things paint a three-dimensional picture.
for the AV.
The problem is if it's raining,
the LIDAR,
which sends out about a million and a half pulses per second,
may not be able to cut through that rain, sleet, or snow.
It's also painting the lines in the road.
The LIDAR is, and if a road's under construction,
how many of us have seen roads where the lines weren't yet repainted?
Those kinds of things throw off the seeing of the systems.
As far as the thinking of the systems,
their program that early ones were programmed,
all the other drivers are going to follow the traffic rules.
What could be wrong with that assumption?
See, that's where my problem is.
When I'm talking about human drivers,
I'm really not even talking about the lackadaisicalness.
That's a good word you can use that again.
The lackadaisicalness of the driver of the A.V.
I'm talking about me driving my car thinking,
I'll just get over, they'll wait.
Excellent point.
You're making that move out of nowhere.
and you either slam on the brakes, you just swerve to the left, where the AV car doesn't really know what's going on, right?
It has no idea.
Excellent, excellent point.
And that's something that's still in development.
So these things are really being beta tested on our roads.
And if your Apple phone's being beta tested and it crashes, you lose your phone, you may lose some data, but people don't die.
And that's why some at least were concerned about the Postal Service's plan to put big 18 wheelers using technology that we're still.
perfecting. Don't we have, now let me ask you this. How much are you involved in some of the,
in the beginning cases of how we're going to utilize this? Because I would think that, you know,
my argument to the, to the AVs on the highways would be keep them outside of the cities, right?
I mean, the highways, that's fine. Let it be on the highways. When they, you know, the warehouses,
or at least a landing strip zone can be out.
outside of the, all these metroplexes,
and that's where they stop, human takes over, right?
At least for now, right?
I mean, are we, have any thoughts of that,
or we just don't care because the profit line says,
let's deliver it to wherever we wanna deliver it to.
Because one of the hardest things,
and I'm sorry, I'm, one of the hardest things
that they're struggling with is that final delivery.
Sure.
You know, the postal service is gonna struggle with
that bill that needs to get
from their office to my mailbox.
You know, Amazon worries about that last, you know,
the iron that I bought coming from their warehouse to my house.
That last segment is the toughest segment to get to.
You hit the nail on the head, Jeff.
And that's why in this test run, for instance,
it's a long run.
Each round trips 2100 miles.
It's more than one human driver could do.
You'd have to do it with multiple human drivers,
and it's an open run from feet.
to Dallas. It goes through Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. So I think the thinking appears to be,
we're going to keep this on the highways focused for these long runs. But you raise another point,
which is important, is the financial incentive. Trucking is a $700 billion with a B dollar industry.
On top of which, I'm a fan of truckers, and I've talked to truckers many times on this broadcast and on this network.
And I say, you know, on behalf of them, screw these AV truckers, all right?
That's right.
And a third of the trucking industry's cost are drivers, and there are shortages of drivers
right now.
So there's a financial incentive.
And they're making it more and more difficult for the driver to actually be on the road.
That's right.
And I don't think that's any coincidence.
More regulations, more problems of all kinds for drivers who drive our merchandise and
mail around on our highways and byways.
We've got an aging workforce in the trucking industry, difficulty attracting new drivers.
So we just need to be sure that.
profit alone isn't dictating this and that we keep in incentivizations for safety. And I'm a
lawyer, so you won't be surprised to hear me say. There needs to be legal accountability if
companies take shortcuts and they try to race to the front and they put safety in the backseat
instead of in the front seat. So where are we at right now? I mean, we're talking about,
you're talking about somebody needs to be held accountable. All right. So who's going to insure it?
Is there going to be insurance?
Are you going to insure the car?
Are you insuring the driver?
Are you insuring the company?
Who's responsible for that automobile?
Who's responsible for the delivery of the products?
I mean, where are we at right now with that?
That's a great question, Jeff.
There are legal debates going on right now
about whether our existing legal system can handle this new technology.
And proponents of not throwing out the baby with the bathwater, if you will,
say technology has been accommodated by our legal system. We accommodated horses, carriages,
airplanes. We can get through this. And we don't need to federalize our whole tort system,
the system by which we compensate people who've been wrong. Insurance is a big question. Insurance
companies are having emergency meetings right now. What is this going to do to our profit?
They're not worried about you and I. They're worried about their bottom line. How much is this going to cost?
Are we going to see fewer accidents?
How many fewer accidents?
What should we charge for this?
Should we sell insurance to me, the driver, to the manufacturers, to the software developers?
What do we need to do?
All of that's getting worked out right now in real time.
And while it's being worked out, we're going to allow them on the roads just to test.
That's right.
States, including Texas, have raced to the forefront.
You know, Florida, California, Texas, and a few others have been at the forefront.
of they are welcome on our highways and byways and streets.
Arizona, there was a little bit of a backlash after that Uber, which had a human
attendant, by the way, ran into the woman who was walking her bicycle across the
front of it.
The human attendant was streaming video on her cell phone and wasn't watching and didn't
assume control of that Uber to keep it from killing the woman walking her bicycle in
front of it.
It's not, it doesn't have anything to do with Uber, really.
No. And proponents of AVs say people die all day, every day in car crashes because of human error.
90% of car crashes. More than 90% are caused by human error. So where we're trying to get with this is a new world where many, many fewer accidents, fewer lives lost, less carnage.
And let alone human error. I mean, you can have mechanical error and the whole thing screws up. I mean, we're back to that. We're back to, you know, we're full circle again to what causes it and we're going to be on the road.
And so how much money are you raking in on these cases right now?
What do you rake in in in for me?
Well, these cases, there have been a handful.
You're building new studios right now.
There have been a handful of these filed primarily against Tesla.
I have not filed one of the lawsuits involving an autonomous vehicle, but the systems are very similar.
Some of the same manufacturers that we see in automobile products litigation that many of us, including on handled.
Yes.
And so we-
Because they all want to be on to flip there.
They all want a piece of it.
I mean,
they're not,
it's not a mistake that they're billion-dollar companies.
No.
And the investments,
these companies,
including Toyota and others,
it's big even for Toyota to do a loan.
Toyota's joint venturing with other companies.
Why?
Because the costs are so big to do this.
They all are really.
I mean, General Motors is doing that.
And I know that Ford is.
I mean,
they're all making huge strides with other companies
trying to be on the forefront of this.
And it's,
I don't know that it's going to get ugly,
but it might get ugly.
I think so.
There's definitely a competition.
We just need to make sure safety doesn't get thrown to the wayside in that competition.
And we'll leave it at that today and more to come on chewing the fat.
But we're in the break room and we'll leave it at that.
Let's air on the side of safety.
Quentin, thank you so much for joining us on chewing the fat today.
I appreciate it.
Thanks, Jeff.
We haven't heard the last of this.
That's for sure.
You know, as long as we're still in the break room,
I just want to say that if you're listening today,
the 28th of May, 2019, it's National Hamburger Day.
First, let me ask my executive producer, Chris Cruz,
when the hamburgers will be here to celebrate National Hamburger Day.
In about 30 minutes.
Right now on this program, there is not a hamburger to celebrate.
30 minutes.
By the way, thank you for the promotion, executive producer.
I like it.
When I want something from you?
That's what your title is.
Don't get used to it.
A new study shows a difference in performance between men and women depending on the temperature.
Duh.
No kidding.
As the temp went up in the study, women did better on math and verbal tasks.
Men did worse.
The increase for women in math and verbal tasks was much larger than the study.
the pronounced, what's more pronounced than the decrease.
So women were a lot smarter and the men weren't as dumb.
So again, I think that proves that men outshine women.
But they, that's just me.
Now, according to them, the study was really strange to how they studied it because they
went from, I mean, really cold like 61 degrees up to 91 degrees.
No one's working in 91 degree weather.
When this building gets to be above 70, it's too hot.
I mean, you've got lights and everything going crazy.
I'm sorry.
If you're a female in this building, wear a sweater, put a blanket on, be warm.
You can always become cooler.
You can't always become warmer.
I'm sorry, you can get warmer.
Put a blanket on, put a sweater on.
You're warmer.
Okay, you're fine.
everything is good.
But if you're overheating, there's no way to cool down quick enough and good enough
without, you know, taking all your clothes off and putting a fan on and, you know,
splashing some cold water around and nobody really wants that.
Nobody really wants that.
So according to the studiers, the research said that, look, it's only, it's not about,
it's not about who's better, what's better.
It's just that if you care about productivity in your business,
the comfort of your workers should be taken into account.
And in the long run, it will take, you know,
it will affect the bottom line.
And he talks about, look, if workers are keeping blankets at their desks
or sweating through their shirts,
you may consider changing the temperature.
Here's my thought.
If people are keeping blankets and sweaters at their desk,
good.
If they have to use them, they can use them.
because we don't want to sweat.
No, sweating is
bad when you're working.
I was born sweating.
Sweating is bad when you're working.
Now, I don't know if I've ever told you this or not,
but I lived in Florida for a long time.
What?
I know.
I know.
I don't like to talk about it much, but.
I live in Tampa Bay.
What?
I know.
I lived in Tampa Bay for a long time.
I love Florida.
You crossed a bridge?
I love Florida.
Yeah, I crossed all the bridges.
There were several bridges.
Did you work anywhere?
I don't know if you know that.
I mean, there's the Gandy Bridge and the Howard Franklin Bridge and the Courtney Campbell Bridge.
And then, of course, the Skyway Bridge.
That's only the only bridges are, you know, Tampa Bay.
So anyway, this story makes me feel like, what?
I didn't know.
There's a hotel on Clearwater Beach, which is Tampa Bay, called the Amber Tides Motel.
The Amber Tides Motel.
We have to call this place.
We have to call this place because I looked it up.
I want to see exactly where it was on Clearwater Beach.
And when I bring up the map, it says permanently closed.
But they still are advertising.
They're still looking.
So we just want to call and see if they're open.
Because now this is a good way to get business.
Maybe they reopened and now there's a good way to get business.
They have an orgasm room that women are dying.
And I mean, they are struggling to get to the Amber Tides.
I know.
I know.
An orgasm room at the Amber Tides Motel.
Don't even, I mean, I know.
There were rumors and there are stories about that talk about this particular room at the Amber Tides Motel.
She said that she went to the room.
The lights were on.
I could feel the bed starting to tremble.
but it wasn't, this is like a penthouse story
is really what it is.
I started to feel things I've never felt before.
It was kind of like I was being softly caressed by thousand hands.
It was like my entire body became so sensitive to the touch.
It was like my entire body was being pleased.
It was so overwhelming.
The Amber Tides Motel on Clearwater Beach.
This is a good way to get people to come to your hotel
if you're struggling for business.
But are they open?
We need to call.
And it's listed here as a two-star.
So, I mean, that's above camping.
It's an older-style motel.
Amber Tides.
It's a motel, which, you know,
you're not going to have the monster,
you know, the monster chain motels
that are 20 stories high and more.
All right.
The number you have dialed is not in service.
Oh.
Are they done?
What are we?
Oh, no, hold on.
Hold on.
We got to talk.
Hold on.
This might be a deal.
different number then.
Hold on.
It's two star.
Clearwater Beach hotels.
Amber.
This place cannot.
We have to reopen this.
If this is true,
if this has got a haunted room,
an orgasm room,
it's going to be the chewing
the Fat Tides Motel very soon.
So I think we've been had.
The number is,
it's not open anymore,
and what they're trying to do
is raise the price of selling the Amber Ties
because it's closed now.
Because the link to their website takes me to Hotels in Clearwater, Hotels.com.
The phone number you heard is disconnected, nobody there.
So they must be trying to sell the Amber Tides.
And the only way to sell the Amhertides for good cash is to let people believe that it has the orgasm room.
And you can't tear it down on Clearwater Beach.
It's a must.
I mean, if it's true, it is a must.
All right, so over the weekend, you know, the big long three-day weekend for everybody,
and some were even longer than that.
There was one trending video, viral video, that I thought, this is really funny.
And I don't know if it's real.
Again, you know, we were just crushed with our Amber's, Amber Hotel, Amber Tides Motel at Clearwater.
so we'll just hope that this is actually real.
But a woman has recorded her father knowing God's first name.
And God's first name is Howard.
And I don't know if you heard that.
Can we get a pastor on to confirm this?
I think if you just listen to his explanation, we could.
But the video that this woman recorded is of her father,
who I don't know, could be a pastor.
explaining why God's name is Howard and how he got to it.
God.
God's name.
What is God's name?
Howard.
How do you know God's name is Howard?
Our father, who art in heaven, Howard be thy name.
I mean, I don't think you have to explain any more than that, do you?
I don't know his last name.
Is it Winsner?
So, Winsner must be there.
And Amy, we got it.
You can stop this now.
Just as a joke.
He needed it.
See, you didn't need to.
You didn't need to play the whole thing.
How do you know God's name is Howard?
Our father, who art in heaven, Howard be thy name.
That's all you need.
And he didn't know the last day.
It's all we needed.
It's all we needed.
I mean, we just do the punchlines here on chewing the fat.
Art in heaven.
Howard Belaan.
So good.
I still need a pastor
to confirm this.
Do you know if this man is not a pastor or not?
He looks more like Osama bin Laden.
No, no, no.
Saddam Hussein when he was younger.
He does look similar to Saddam Hussein.
He's got a little Saddam look.
He does.
So you can tell that perhaps
he doesn't care that much about God.
Well, he knows him by his first name.
How does he know what his first name is?
Bart in heaven, Howard Belaan.
I'll stop now.
