Chief Change Officer - #427 Waverly Deutsch: Love and Logic—Building Businesses That Actually Work—Part Three
Episode Date: July 9, 2025Waverly Deutsch doesn’t just coach entrepreneurs—she translates English to English, reframes stories with strategy, and helps even the most logic-trained professionals tap into their conv...iction. In this three-part series, we walk through her unusual path from consulting to Chicago Booth to founding WyseHeart, her pitch strategy firm.Each episode reveals a new dimension of her journey: the personal (Part 1), the academic and instructional (Part 2), and the entrepreneurial, including her bold take on how to co-exist with AI (Part 3). Across every chapter, Waverly models what it means to coach with both love and logic—bringing clear frameworks to messy human dreams.Key Highlights of Our Interview:What Investors Actually Want“Good ideas are everywhere. I invest in people who know how to execute.”Lessons from both sides of the table: raising capital and writing checks.You Are Not Your Company“When a startup fails, it doesn’t mean you failed.”Helping founders detach identity from outcome.The Metrics That Really Matter“Sometimes traction isn’t revenue—it’s retention, referrals, or even the right kind of no.”How she helps founders track the right signals.Managing the Urge to Please“Women, especially, are taught to be agreeable. That doesn’t work in fundraising.”Teaching confidence without arrogance.Love and Logic, Always“Lead with empathy. Decide with data. And know which one to use when.”Her golden rule for founders—and herself._______________________________Connect with us:Host: Vince Chan | Guest: Waverly Deutsch --Chief Change Officer--Change Ambitiously. Outgrow Yourself.Open a World of Expansive Human Intelligencefor Transformation Gurus, Black Sheep,Unsung Visionaries & Bold Hearts.EdTech Leadership Awards 2025 Finalist.20 Million+ All-Time Downloads.80+ Countries Reached Daily.Global Top 1% Podcast.Top 5 US Business.Top 1 US Careers.>>>200,000+ are outgrowing. Act Today.<<<See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Agent Nate Russo returns in Oracle III, Murder at the Grandview,
the latest installment of the gripping Audible original series.
When a reunion at an abandoned island hotel turns deadly,
Russo must untangle accident from murder.
But beware, something sinister lurks in the Grandview shadows.
Joshua Jackson delivers a bone-chilling performance
in the supernatural thriller that will keep you on the edge of your seat.
Don't let your fears take hold of you as you dive into this addictive series.
Love thrillers with a paranormal twist? The entire Oracle trilogy is available on Audible.
Listen now on Audible. Hi, everyone.
Welcome to our show, Chief Change Officer.
I'm Vince Chen, your ambitious human host. Our show is a modernist community for change progressives in organizational and human transformation from around the world.
If you've been following closely our special three-part love and logic series.
You know this episode is the final session,
the finale of our trilogy, so to speak.
Today, we'll come full circle
and refocus on Waverly herself.
She spent 22 years teaching at Chicago Booth,
where one of her signature courses was building new ventures.
Now she is building her own venture called Wiseheart.
In this episode, you'll hear her pitch.
As you listen to our conversation,
put on your entrepreneur coach hat and ask yourself,
how compelling is her pitch?
She'll discuss the why behind her actions,
what wise heart is exactly, who the target customers are,
and how she plans to help these people.
Lastly, where the name Wiseheart originated.
If you're just joining this series, I strongly encourage you to check out the previous two parts.
We started the series by focusing on Waverly's personal journey, the love and logic behind her career path and experiences.
Then in part 2, we explored a significant chapter of her career, 22 years at Chicago
Blue.
There, she taught and coached a well-defined group of highly logical talents who were passionate
about innovation, change, and entrepreneurship.
From that structured environment, we transitioned to discussing her current role as a coach
for a broader and more diverse group of entrepreneurs.
We also touched on the topic of AI human coaching, where AI serves as the powerhouse of logic.
While AI can create flawless pitch decks and resumes, Waverly emphasizes that
building a business is about fostering human relationships.
AI might set the stage,
AI might set the stage, but it's the human touch
that builds real connections with investors and employers.
Let our finale begin. Let's dive into your newest venture, Wiseheart.
I'm really curious about how you plan to continue supporting entrepreneurs with this new initiative.
Over the years, you've coached and judged so many entrepreneurs.
So for a moment, let's switch gears.
I'll put on my coach's hat and step into the shoes of a new venture challenge judge.
Imagine you're now pitching wise heart to me.
So tell me, what exactly is Wiseheart?
What's the core mission there?
Whose problem are you trying to tackle?
I'd like to learn more about the specific characteristics of the people you're trying to help.
More importantly, how are you going about addressing the challenges?
Often, I think that the best pitches talk a little bit about momentum and traction and a little bit about the
reason for the existence of the business.
As a wise heart advisor, I am an operating partner with OCA Ventures, a venture capitalist in Chicago. I'm an advisor to Pace Healthcare Ventures, a venture capitalist in Chicago.
I'm working with anywhere from half a dozen to a dozen entrepreneurs actively in everything
from building their business strategies and processes to raising money.
That's what I'm doing with Wiseheart.
Wiseheart was started not because I wanted to build a scalable company and sell it for a hundred million dollars.
Wiseheart was started because I was retiring.
And what that means to me, what retirement means to me is that you no
longer have to work
in order to cover your basic necessities,
to keep your benefits, to have a steady paycheck,
but the work you do because you want to do it.
And some of that work might be remunerated, paid for,
and some of that work might be volunteer,
and some of it might be purely recreational.
And your job in retirement is to figure out the balance that you're looking
for across those three dimensions.
So that's my definition of retirement.
I knew I was going to continue to support entrepreneurs.
I knew I was going to continue to work with venture capitalists.
I'm passionate about that work.
I love it.
Highly personally rewarding.
And though I feel like I may be working more hours than I worked as a professor at Booth,
particularly when I was focused on the EMBA program where the work came in spurts, right?
As you know, their classes are very intensive for short periods of time.
And I'm making a tiny fraction of what I was making as a fully employed professor.
I'm having more fun than I've ever had.
So Wiseheart was a place to put all of that work,
an LLC for tax purposes where I could get paid.
It was never intended to be a business
that makes me millions of dollars.
Why Wiseheart?
Because I love working with entrepreneurs.
I love working with innovators. I love working with entrepreneurs. I love working with innovators.
I love working with investors.
Who is my target customer?
My target customer is entrepreneurs
who have a really great business
who are struggling to bring it to market.
That means that I might have a session with you
and turn you down as a client because I don't think that either the business or you or the market is compelling.
And as an independent consultant, I have the ability to do that, to say no to customers. And I have done that.
I said, this is not a business that I think I can add value to because I don't believe in it. Wiseheart is for early stage companies
and investors who invest in early stage companies.
Not interested in taking on corporate innovation clients,
not interested in helping a very large growth company
get their Series D, that is not my skillset,
that is not my passion.
But my passion is to help entrepreneurs who have really great business concepts and really
great business capabilities, bring their products and services to market in the best way possible.
I also want Wiseheart to be more accessible to entrepreneurs for whom the rest of the ecosystem is less accessible.
So let's talk for a minute about women entrepreneurs.
There's a big statistic that everybody likes to use that women entrepreneurs get 2% of VC dollars.
And that's a little bit misleading because the truth of the matter is that women only
teams of entrepreneurs get 2% of venture capital dollars mixed gendered teams get
another anywhere from depending on the year 13 to 18 to 18% of venture capital
dollars. But that still means that 80 to 85% of venture capital dollars are going to all
male teams, all male founding teams. So there's a lot of
room there for improving the way the venture capital world sees
opportunity with female entrepreneurs and funds
opportunity with female entrepreneurs. I would like to
spend more of my time with female entrepreneurs and I do.
At Booth, I spent more of my time with female entrepreneurs and I do. At Booth, I spent more of my time with male entrepreneurs simply because the
population of Booth is more male than it is female.
Now I can choose.
I can spend more of my time with female entrepreneurs than male entrepreneurs.
By the way, guys, if you're listening, I have lots of male clients.
I do not turn down male clients, but I can make myself available to women, minorities,
minority entrepreneurs, people of color, people from rural areas, people who come from less
affluent backgrounds.
These are all people who struggle more in the process of building businesses that require
outside funding.
I would like Wiseheart to serve more
of those kinds of entrepreneurs.
So I am talking with venture funds
that focus on women entrepreneurs,
that focus on people of color.
I am working with StartOut,
one of the biggest entrepreneurship
not-for-profit organizations supporting
LGBTQ plus entrepreneurs.
I want in Wiseheart to be able to dedicate my time
to the people who don't always have access
to someone like me.
If I teach again, it will likely be at a community college
where those people are unlikely to ever experience
a professor like me.
I want Wiseheart to be part
Renumerative and part giving back.
And that's the goal of Wiseheart.
And by the way, my tagline is
Tough love for entrepreneurs.
So I'm not pulling my punches here.
I'm giving the same kind of coaching
to the entrepreneurs that I work with
as an independent that I always
did to you and your colleagues at Booth.
Absolutely. I remember your tagline, tough love for entrepreneurs. I also recall that
a few years back, you published an article about LGBTQ entrepreneurs in the Chicago Booth Review. I read the article myself, and
it highlighted how underrepresented this group is in the entrepreneurial community.
From what I remember, you discussed challenges like funding and general support. It wouldn't surprise me if you planned to focus more
on supporting them going forward.
Yes, in fact, I just accepted a speaking engagement
to talk a little bit about LGBTQ entrepreneurs
in today's world with the Association
for Enterprise Opportunity.
They're doing an event for Pride Month.
I am hoping to work with StartOut to refresh the report that we did in 2016 on
the state of LGBTQ entrepreneurship in the U.S.
Because I think that data is now almost 10 years old.
That data is now almost 10 years old. And one of the biggest challenges in thinking about the availability of resources
to LGBTQ entrepreneurs is that nobody collects the data, right?
That's something where you have to self-identify.
You don't find it in the census.
You don't, you can't use AI to screen for names that indicate being a member of the LGBTQ
community the way you do for gender research or even BIPOC research where you can triangulate
and create a data set that is likely to be made up of people with non-Caucasian heritage. You can't
do that. This is a community that has to self-identify.
So you can't say to venture capitalists, how many LGBTQ entrepreneurs do you have in among your
portfolio companies? Because they say, how would we know? Unless that entrepreneur has had a direct
conversation with them, unless they have self-identified with their investor, it's very difficult to get data.
There's a wonderful group out of Chicago called Blend
that is working on diversity
in the venture capital community in Chicago.
And when they were doing their research,
I said, why aren't you asking about LGBTQ entrepreneurs?
They said, isn't that intrusive?
So we think it's not intrusive to ask about gender. we think it's not intrusive to ask about gender.
We think it's not intrusive to ask someone about their marital status
or if they have kids, but we think it's intrusive to ask if they identify as LGBTQ.
Why?
Because there's still a risk in identifying that way.
So I said, rather than asking,
are you an LGBTQ plus founder?
You can ask, do you choose to publicly identify
as an LGBTQ plus founder, right?
You can ask your venture capitalists,
how many self-identified LGBTQ capital entrepreneurs
have you funded in your portfolio?
We have to rely on self-identification to even collect data in that space.
That makes it much harder to know what's happening with their access to resources,
with their support, with their outcomes.
It's just a very difficult community to support for that reason because in the US
and in many cultures around the world, it's still a risk to
come out as LGBTQ. We've seen a huge rise of anti-LGBTQ backlash in this country.
Cargit, which has annually done a beautiful collection of products for Pride, gave into the
protests about recognizing Pride Month and pulled that line of products.
So there are ramifications in this country to being LGBTQ and in many places around the world.
So it's a difficult group of entrepreneurs to support.
So you're right.
In Pride Month, we should acknowledge that's an area of my personal passion and interest
and I hope that Wiseheart can make a tiny difference with some of the individuals in that community.
Yeah, who knows what the future holds, especially with the election coming up.
You mentioned the ongoing issues with LGBTQ identities being illegal in many
places. It's a complex landscape.
I also want to touch on ageism and other critical,
but often overlooked, diversity issue.
You are a baby boomer with extensive experience
across various technological and economic cycles.
Speaking of age, many of our listeners,
whether Gen X like myself or Baby Boomers like you,
might have retired or been laid off for various reasons.
Yet, despite their valuable experience,
they face entrenched ageism in the workplace
and in entrepreneurship.
As we discuss how to balance the heart and the head,
love and logic, When making career decisions involving moving from corporate
roles to entrepreneurship to taking risks, the challenges can be very daunting
for more mature individuals. So my question for you is, if an entrepreneur
from Gen X or the Baby Boomer generation approaches
you, wanting to do something meaningful to create a legacy?
They have ideas that could solve problems in industry, they've known for decades,
but they may not be as tech savvy as a lot of people perceive them that way.
Or the pitch is not modern or sexy.
How would you advise them?
How would you help them balance the passion for their project
with the logical aspects of launching a new venture at lay age?
That's a great question. And you're 100% right.
I'm seeing that in the market right now.
Right now in this country, we're going through a very strange
time when the markets are at an all time high, the public markets
are at an all time high.
And yet the tech companies are
announcing layoffs constantly and valuations for privately held tech companies have fallen off
tremendously. It's a very strange economy and you're 100% right that economic situations make a
huge difference in the landscape for entrepreneurs of all kinds. And I think I can't answer this question without
acknowledging the incredible privilege that I've had in my life.
People hear about the struggles I've gone through and the hard work
I've put in and I honor that but I was born white to a middle-class
household where I got excellent education and excellent opportunities
and I've been very fortunate to have the kind of career, 22 years at a university where
I've been able to accumulate a retirement nest egg, I am still able to get health insurance
through the university, albeit I have to pay for it.
I am incredibly fortunate and incredible.
My privilege has been part of my journey.
And I think it's really important to acknowledge that a lot of entrepreneurs
come from very different places and they don't have that.
And so when I look at folks of my generation who do not have nest eggs for the future,
who are being subject to layoffs, why?
Because when you are senior in your career, you're more expensive.
So if I lay off someone who is making $200,000 as a director in marketing, I could take that
$200,000
and hire three young people out of college.
Age is a factor in these decisions.
Seniority is a factor in these decisions.
And now you have these incredibly talented,
experienced people in their 50s, in their 60s,
who wanna keep working, who have a lot to add, but who are also
now pretty expensive people for a full-time job. And they're saying, what
do I do? What do I do with all of this experience? What do I do with all of this
energy? I don't want to take a job that is a $75,000 a year job because I'm
forced to it. I want to do something different and people have different levels of
choice at different times.
So one of the things that I'm noticing in that community and one of the things
that I'm talking with that community about is you have been exited from these
companies because they need to reduce costs because you're expensive
and yet they still see the value of your wisdom and experience.
Many of these people are laid off without a
lot to transition plans.
And I think a lot of companies have made that mistake.
So I see a friend of mine who is a financial expert laid off from her CFO job, now consulting as an interim CFO for various companies in the industry that she came out of.
Same thing with sales executives being brought in.
What I would say to those people is, you may have to do work that you outgrew in your career.
You may as a CFO have to go back to work you did as an accountant
or a controller to establish your value to a young company
that's growing that needs financial knowledge.
You may not be able to be a strategic CFO.
You may have to actually go back to some of the work that got you to where you are. If you want to consult in building a go-to-market or a sales organization, you might have to write marketing collateral. You might have to get on sales calls. You might have to do the kind of work you did when you were coming up to establish your value as someone that now charges consulting
rates instead of full-time salary rates.
If you're able to do that, there's a lot of room out there to find consulting work, to
find engagements that could lead you to your next job.
But your dream of I'm going to go from my $200,000 job to a bigger better $250,000 job when you're in your 60s in this
market, that's a difficult one.
You may have to let go of that.
It's not just about stripping your
mindset or
upgrading your skill,
learning new technologies
and branching out.
The market itself
is transforming.
I see
a future where
new types of jobs
and careers emerge. Roles we haven't even imagined.
The names or labels for these positions might not even exist today. But give it a year,
two or three years max. Thanks to advancement in AI and other technologies, we're going to see work processes and roles
evolve in ways we can't yet imagine.
I view this shifting career landscape not just as a transition, but as an ocean of growth opportunities for everyone, whether they are in 40s, 50s,
or even 60s. Health is, of course, a vital consideration. As long as we're healthy, See, those of us with sound minds and cross-generation experience, particularly in people skills and
relationship building, will find immense value.
These skills are crucial even for AI-focused tech companies like OpenAI.
They're looking for individuals who can bridge the human technology
gap, making these seemingly complex, more approachable, and human relevant.
Absolutely, you mentioned re-skilling and up-skilling. I can't tell you how many people
I know who are signing up on Coursera for a prompt engineering class to learn how to better leverage generative AI.
People are going to need to use the contemporary tools to deliver the value
that they bring as experienced professionals.
Definitely engage with the newer technologies because you can't walk into a
growth company populated by a bunch of 20 and 30 somethings and not understand the impact
of generative AI or not understand the impact of social media marketing or not know what
TikTok is, you have to be able to communicate in the language of today's
companies if you want to build a new career after your corporate career.
So we are at the end of our interview, Waverly.
This is the first time in my podcast that I create a three-part series
on a single topic and a single guest.
You are the first person.
How do you find this experience yourself?
I just want to say I love how this conversation
range from career and heart and head into AI,
continuing with the heart and head metaphor, because AI is all head, so you got to bring the heart, to diversity issues, which are very much
heart and head. Diversity is not only the right thing to do, but there's a lot of evidence out
there that it creates better business results, that focusing on diversity
actually improves your business results.
So I think I love the wide ranging conversational topics that you brought up, Mintz.
Today, it was a really excellent conversation.
Oh, I almost forgot.
That's one important question I haven't asked you yet.
I kind of guessed the reason, but I'd like you to share with us in the show. The name of your firm, Wise Heart. Any thought process behind it? Could
you share your little secret with us?
So I'm working with a great agency on the book, and I was creating the LLC as a place
to put revenues from the book, consulting revenues, things like that.
And I was working on what to name it.
And I, of course, being very head oriented was thinking of things like
Sepentia, which is Latin for wisdom.
And the agency was like, no, nobody knows what that means.
They both know what you're doing.
It makes no sense.
And I'm like, OK, so I want to think about wisdom
because I am in the latter portions of my life
and I have gained a lot of wisdom over my years.
And I think that's one of the things I bring in.
And they said, you know what?
You talk about tough love
because what you're bringing is also the love.
And that's where the combination wise heart came in. And you commented
earlier that I spell it with a Y. The reason for that is quite simple. I could get the URL I could
be wiseheart.com. If you spell it with an I you can't get the URL I wanted the URL.
So Waverly thank you so much. We got so much good insights from you today.
So I'll definitely invite you back for another session.
Thank you so much for your time.
Vance, it's been my sincere pleasure.
A special thanks to Waverly for sharing two hours
of her valuable time for such amazing
and candid conversation.
That's a wrap on our three-part series on Love and Logic.
For those who appreciate Waverly's insights and teachings,
be sure to explore the other two episodes of this series if you enjoy this finale.
Thank you so much for joining us today. If you like what you heard, don't forget, subscribe to our show,
leave us top-rated reviews, check out our website,
and follow me on social media.
I'm Vince Chen, your ambitious human host.
Until next time, take care.