Chief Change Officer - Final Act: How Waverly Deutsch Elevates Underrepresented Entrepreneurs with Love and Logic
Episode Date: June 14, 2024This is Part 3 of a special three-part podcast series titled “Love and Logic.” This Pride Month, we’re celebrating the spirit of championing our true identities with a special three-part podcast... series titled “Love and Logic.” Waverly Deutsch, a proud member of the LGBTQ community and a staunch advocate for women entrepreneurs, navigates her multifaceted identity with aplomb— from a theater lover to PhD, from a STEM major to MBA professor, and from retiree to a baby boomer coaching venture builder. Waverly, often compared to “the Simon Cowell of the Chicago Booth New Venture Challenge,” is celebrated not just for her straightforward feedback but for coupling it with practical, transformative advice. It’s this combination of tough love and insightful guidance that has influenced her approach to coaching underrepresented entrepreneurs at WyseHeart Advisory. Episode Breakdown: 00:21—Finale of the “Love & Logic” Trilogy: What’s in store for the final act of our three-part series? 3:24 — Wyseheart’s Big Pitch: Watch Waverly pitch her unique venture—think of it as Chicago Booth-quality coaching with a twist, aimed at empowering underrepresented entrepreneurs. It’s diversity with a dash of love and a pinch of logic. 10:45 — “Why It Matters for LBGTQ Entrepreneurs to Come Out”: In 2016, Waverly shared her insights on why it’s crucial for LGBTQ entrepreneurs to be visible on Chicago Booth Review. Fast forward to today, and discover why these discussions are more vital than ever. 15:20 — Addressing an Overlooked Age-related Challenge: Dive into Waverly’s perspective on ageism, a critical yet often ignored diversity and economics issue in both the workplace and the entrepreneurial world. 25:30 — The Origin of ‘Wyseheart’: Ever wondered where the name ‘Wyseheart’ came from? Uncover the story behind this heartfelt moniker. Connect with Us: Host: Vince Chan | Guest: Waverly Deutsch Chief Change Officer: Make Change Ambitiously. A Modernist Community for Growth Progressives World's Number One Career Podcast Top 1: US, CA, MX, IE, HU, AT, CH, FI Top 10: GB, FR, SE, DE, TR, IT, ES Top 10: IN, JP, SG, AU 1.3 Million+ Streams 50+ Countries
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, everyone. Welcome to our show, Chief Change Officer. I'm your host, Vince Chan.
If you've been following closely our special three-part Love and Logic series, you know this episode is the final session, the finale of our trilogy, so to speak.
Today, we'll come full circle and refocus on Waverly herself.
She spent 22 years teaching at Chicago Booth,
where one of her signature courses was building new ventures.
Now, she is building her own venture called Wiseheart.
In this episode, you'll hear her pitch.
As you listen to our conversation, put on your entrepreneur coach hat and ask yourself,
how compelling is her pitch?
She'll discuss the why behind her actions,
what Wiseheart is exactly,
who the target customers are,
and how she plans to help these people.
Lastly, where the name Wiseheart originated.
If you're just joining this series,
I strongly encourage you to check out the previous two parts.
We started the series by focusing on Waverly's personal journey,
the love and logic behind her career path and experiences. Then in part two, we explored a significant chapter of her career,
22 years at Chicago Booth.
There, she taught and coached a well-defined group of highly logical talents who were passionate about innovation, change, and entrepreneurship.
From that structured environment, we transitioned to discussing her current role as a coach for a broader and more diverse group of entrepreneurs.
We also touched on the topic of AI human coaching, where AI serves as the powerhouse of logic.
While AI can create flawless pitch decks and resumes, Waverly emphasizes that building a is about fostering human relationships. AI might set the stage,
but it's the human touch that builds real connections
with investors and employers.
Let our finale begin.
Let's dive into your newest venture, Wiseheart. I'm really curious about how you plan
to continue supporting entrepreneurs with this new initiative. Over the years, you've coached and judged so many entrepreneurs.
So for a moment, let's switch gears.
I'll put on my coach's hat and step into the shoes of a new venture challenge judge.
Imagine you're now pitching Wiseheart to me.
So tell me, what exactly is Wiseheart?
What's the core mission there?
Whose problem are you trying to tackle?
I'd like to learn more about the specific characteristics of the people you're trying to help.
More importantly, how are you going about addressing their challenges? And just also, I think that the best pitches talk a little bit about momentum and traction and a little bit about the reason for the existence of the business. As a Wiseheart advisor, I am an operating partner with OCA Ventures, a venture capitalist in Chicago.
I'm an advisor to Pace Healthcare Ventures, a venture capitalist in Chicago. I'm an advisor to Pace Healthcare Ventures,
a venture capitalist in Chicago.
I'm working with anywhere from half a dozen
to a dozen entrepreneurs actively
in everything from building their business strategies
and processes to raising money.
That's what I'm doing with Wiseheart.
Wiseheart was started not because
I wanted to build a scalable company and sell it for $100 million. Wiseheart was started because
I was retiring. And what that means to me, what retirement means to me is that you no longer have
to work in order to cover your basic necessities, to keep your benefits,
to have a steady paycheck, but the work you do because you want to do it. And some of that work
might be remunerated, paid for, and some of that work might be volunteer, and some of it might be
purely recreational. And your job in retirement is to figure out the balance that you're looking
for across those three dimensions.
So that's my definition of retirement.
I knew I was going to continue to support entrepreneurs.
I knew I was going to continue to work with venture capitalists.
I'm passionate about that work.
I love it.
Highly personally rewarding.
And though I feel like I may be working more hours than I worked as a professor at Booth,
particularly when I was focused on the EMBA program where the work came in spurts, right?
As you know, their classes are very intensive for short periods of time.
And I'm making a tiny fraction of what I was making as a fully employed professor.
I'm having more fun than I've ever had. So Wiseheart was a place to put all of that work, an LLC for tax purposes where I could get paid.
It was never intended to be a business that makes me millions of dollars.
Why Wiseheart?
Because I love working with entrepreneurs.
I love working with innovators.
I love working with investors.
Who is my target customer?
My target customer is entrepreneurs who have a really great business who are struggling to bring it to market.
That means that I might have a session with you and turn you down as a client because I don't think that either the business or you or the
market is compelling. And as an independent consultant, I have the ability to do that,
to say no to customers. And I have done that. I said, this is not a business that I think I can
add value to because I don't believe in it. Wiseheart is for early stage companies and investors who invested
early stage companies, not interested in taking on corporate innovation clients, not interested
in helping a very large growth company get their series D. That is not my skill set. That is not
my passion. But my passion is to help entrepreneurs who have
really great business concepts and really great business capabilities bring their products and
services to market in the best way possible. I also want Wiseheart to be more accessible
to entrepreneurs for whom the rest of the ecosystem is less accessible.
So let's talk for a minute about women entrepreneurs.
There's a big statistic that everybody likes to use that women entrepreneurs get 2% of VC dollars.
And that's a little bit misleading because the truth of the matter is that women only teams of entrepreneurs get 2% of venture capital dollars.
Mixed-gendered teams get another anywhere from,
depending on the year, 13% to 18% of venture capital dollars.
But that still means that 80% to 85% of venture capital dollars
are going to all-male, all male founding teams.
So there's a lot of room there for improving the way the venture capital world
sees opportunity with female entrepreneurs and funds opportunity with female entrepreneurs.
I would like to spend more of my time with female entrepreneurs, and I do.
At Booth, I spent more of my time with male entrepreneurs simply because the population of Booth is more male than it is female.
Now I can choose.
I can spend more of my time with female entrepreneurs than male entrepreneurs.
By the way, guys, if you're listening, I have lots of male clients.
I do not turn down male clients, but I can make myself available to women, minorities, minority entrepreneurs, people of color, people from
rural areas, people who come from less affluent backgrounds. These are all people who struggle
more in the process of building businesses that require outside funding. I would like Wiseheart to serve more of those kinds of entrepreneurs.
So I am talking with venture funds that focus on women entrepreneurs, that focus on people of color.
I am working with Dardow, one of the biggest entrepreneurship, not-for-profit organizations
supporting LGBTQ plus entrepreneurs.
I want in Wiseheart to be able to dedicate my time to the people who don't always have access to someone like me.
If I teach again, it will likely be at a community college
where those people are unlikely to ever experience a professor like me.
I want Wiseheart to be part renumerative and part giving back. And that's the goal of Wiseheart. And by the way, my tagline is
tough love for entrepreneurs. So I'm not pulling my punches here. I'm giving the same kind of
coaching to the entrepreneurs that I work with as an independent that I always did to you and your colleagues at Booth.
Absolutely.
I remember your tagline, tough love for entrepreneurs.
I also recall that a few years back, you published an article about LGBTQ entrepreneurs in the Chicago Booth Review.
I read the article myself,
and it highlighted how underrepresented this group is in the entrepreneurial community.
From what I remember,
you discussed challenges like funding and general support.
It wouldn't surprise me if you planned to focus more
on supporting them going forward.
Yes. In fact, I just accepted a speaking engagement to talk a little bit about
LGBTQ entrepreneurs in today's world with the Association for Enterprise Opportunity.
They're doing an event for Pride Month. I am hoping to work with Startout
to refresh the report that we did in 2016
on the state of LGBTQ entrepreneurship in the US
because I think that data is now almost 10 years old.
And one of the biggest challenges
in thinking about the availability of resources to LGBTQ entrepreneurs is that nobody collects the data.
Right. That's something where you have to self-identify.
You don't find it in the census. a screen for names that indicate being a member of the LGBTQ community the way you do for gender
research or even BIPOC research where you can triangulate and create a data set that is likely
to be made up of people with non-Caucasian heritage. You can't do that. This is a community
that has to self-identify. So you can't say to venture capitalists, how many LGBTQ entrepreneurs do you have in among your portfolio companies? Because they say,
how would we know? Unless that entrepreneur has had a direct conversation with them,
unless they have self-identified with their investor, it's very difficult to get data.
There's a wonderful group out of Chicago called Blend
that is working on diversity in the venture capital community in Chicago.
And when they were doing their research,
I said, why aren't you asking about LGBTQ entrepreneurs?
They said, isn't that intrusive?
So we think it's not intrusive to ask about gender.
We think it's not intrusive to ask someone about their marital status or if they have kids.
But we think it's intrusive to ask if they identify as LGBTQ.
Why? Because there's still a risk in identifying that way. Are you an LGBTQ plus founder? You can ask, do you choose to publicly identify as an LGBTQ plus founder, right?
You can ask your venture capitalists, how many self-identified LGBTQ capital entrepreneurs have you funded in your portfolio?
We have to rely on self-identification to even collect data in that space. That makes it
much harder to know what's happening with their access to resources, with their support, with
their outcomes. It's just a very difficult community to support for that reason because
in the U.S. and in many cultures around the world, it's still a risk to come out as LGBTQ. We've seen a huge rise of anti-LGBTQ backlash in this country.
Cargit, which has annually done a beautiful collection of products for Pride,
gave in to the protests about recognizing Pride Month and pulled that line of products.
So there are ramifications in this country to being LGBTQ and in many places
around the world. So it's a difficult group of entrepreneurs to support. So you're right.
In Pride Month, we should acknowledge that's an area of my personal passion and interest,
and I hope that Wiseheart can make a tiny difference with some of the individuals in
that community. Yeah, who knows what the future holds,
especially with the election coming up.
You mentioned the ongoing issues
with LGBTQ identities being illegal in many places
is a complex landscape.
I also want to touch on ageism and other critical but often overlooked
diversity issues. You are a baby boomer with extensive experience across various technological technological and economic cycles. Speaking of age, many of our listeners,
whether Gen X like myself or baby boomers like you, might have retired or been laid off
for various reasons. Yet, despite their valuable experience, they face entrenched ageism in the workplace and in entrepreneurship.
As we discuss how to balance the heart and the head, love and logic.
When making career decisions involving moving from corporate roles to entrepreneurship to taking risks.
The challenges can be very daunting for more mature individuals. So my question for you is,
if an entrepreneur from Gen X or the baby boomer generation approaches you?
Wanting to do something meaningful to create a legacy.
They have ideas that could solve problems in industry they've known for decades,
but they may not be as tech savvy
as a lot of people perceive them that way.
Or the pitch is not modern or sexy?
How would you advise them?
How would you help them balance the passion for their project
with the logical aspects of launching a new venture at late age?
That's a great question, and you're 100% right.
I'm seeing that in the market right now.
Right now in this country, we're going through a very strange time when the markets are at an all-time high, the public markets are at an all-time high, and yet the tech companies are
announcing layoffs constantly and valuations for privately
held tech companies have fallen off tremendously. It's a very strange economy, and you're 100%
right that economic situations make a huge difference in the landscape for entrepreneurs
of all kinds. And I think I can't answer this question without acknowledging the incredible privilege that I've had in my life.
People hear about the struggles I've gone through and the hard work I've put in, and I honor that.
But I was born white to a middle class household where I got excellent education and excellent opportunities. And I've been very
fortunate to have the kind of career, 22 years at a university where I've been able to accumulate
a retirement nest egg. I am still able to get health insurance through the university,
albeit I have to pay for it. I am incredibly fortunate and incredible. My privilege has been
part of my journey. And I think it's really important to acknowledge that a lot of entrepreneurs
come from very different places and they don't have that. And so when I look at folks of my
generation who do not have nest eggs for the future, who are being subject to layoffs. Why?
Because when you are senior in your career, you're more expensive. So if I lay off someone who
is making $200,000 as a director in marketing, I could take that $200,000 and hire three young people out of college.
Age is a factor in these decisions.
Seniority is a factor in these decisions. And now you have these incredibly talented, experienced people in their 50s, in their
60s who want to keep working, who have a lot to add, but who are also now pretty expensive
people for a full-time job.
And they're saying, what do I do? What do I do with all of this experience? What do I do with
all of this energy? I don't want to take a job that is a $75,000 a year job because I'm forced
to it. I want to do something different. And people have different levels of choice at different times.
So one of the things that I'm noticing in that community, and one of the things that I'm talking
with that community about is, you have been exited from these companies because they need to reduce
costs, because you're expensive, and yet they still see the value of your wisdom and experience.
Many of these people are being hired by companies like the companies they came from as consultants.
There is generational knowledge capture that is lost
when people are laid off without a lot to transition plans. And
I think a lot of companies have made that mistake. So I see a friend of mine who is a financial
expert laid off from her CFO job now consulting as an interim CFO for various companies in the industry that she came out of.
Same thing with sales executives being brought in. What I would say to those people is
you may have to do work that you outgrew in your career. You may, as a CFO, have to go back to work you did as an
accountant or a controller to establish your value to a young company that's growing that needs
financial knowledge. You may not be able to be a strategic CFO. You may have to actually go back
to some of the work that got you to where you are. If you want to
consult in building a go-to-market or a sales organization, you might have to write marketing
collateral. You might have to get on sales calls. You might have to do the kind of work you did
when you were coming up to establish your value as someone that now charges consulting rates instead of full-time salary rates,
if you're able to do that, there's a lot of room out there to find consulting work,
to find engagements that could lead you to your next job. But your dream of I'm going to go from my $200,000 job to a bigger, better $250,000
job when you're in your 60s in this market, that's a difficult one. You may have to let go of that.
It's not just about tricking your mindset or upgrading your skill, learning new technologies and branching out.
The market itself is transforming. I see a future where new types of jobs and careers emerge. Roles we haven't even imagined.
The names or labels for these positions
might not even exist today.
But give it a year, two or three years max,
thanks to advancement in AI and other technologies,
we're going to see work processes and roles evolve in ways we can't yet imagine.
I view this shifting career landscape not just as a transition,
but as an origin of growth opportunities for everyone,
whether they are in their 40s, 50s, or even 60s.
Health is, of course, a vital consideration. As long as we are healthy, those of us with sound
minds and cross-generation experience, particularly in people skills and relationship building,
will find immense value.
These skills are crucial even for AI-focused tech companies
like OpenAI.
They're looking for individuals who
can bridge the human technology gap,
making these seemingly complex, more approachable, and human-relevant.
Absolutely. You mentioned reskilling and upskilling.
I can't tell you how many people I know who are signing up on Coursera
for a prompt engineering class to learn how to better leverage generative AI.
People are going to need to use the contemporary tools to deliver the value that they bring as
experienced professionals. Definitely engage with the newer technologies because you can't walk into a growth company populated by a bunch of 20
and 30 somethings and not understand the impact of generative AI or not understand the impact of
social media marketing or not know what TikTok is. You have to be able to communicate in the language of today's companies if you want to build a new career
after your corporate career. So we are at the end of our interview, hopefully. This is the first time
in my podcast that I create a three-part series on a single topic and a single guest. You are the first person.
How do you find this experience yourself? I just want to say I love how this conversation ranged
from career and heart and head into AI, continuing with the heart and head metaphor, because AI is all head, so
you've got to bring the heart, to diversity issues, which are very much heart and head.
Diversity is not only the right thing to do, but there's a lot of evidence out there that
it creates better business results, that focusing on diversity actually improves your business
results. So I think I love the wide ranging conversational topics that you brought up, Vince. Today, it was a really
excellent conversation. Oh, I almost forgot. That's one important question I haven't asked you yet.
I kind of guessed the reason, but I'd like you to share with us in the show. The name of your firm, Wiseheart, and thought process behind it.
Could you share your little secret with us? So I'm working with a great agency on the book,
and I was creating the LLC as a place to put revenues from the book, consulting revenues,
things like that. And I was working on what to name it. And I, of course, being very head oriented,
was thinking of things like sepentia,
which is Latin for wisdom.
And the agency was like, no, nobody knows what that means.
They both know what you're doing.
It makes no sense.
And I'm like, okay, so I want to think about wisdom
because I am in the latter portions
of my life and I have gained a lot of wisdom over my years and I think that's one of the things I
bring and and they said you know what you talk about tough love because what you're bringing
is also the love and that's where the combination wise heart came in. And you commented earlier that I spell it with a Y.
The reason for that is quite simple. I could get the URL. I could be wiseheart.com. If you spell
it with an I, you can't get the URL. I wanted the URL. So, Waverly, thank you so much. We got so
much good insights from you today. So, I definitely would invite you back for another session.
Thank you so much for your time.
Vance, it's been my sincere pleasure.
A special thanks to Waverly
for sharing two hours
of her valuable time
for such amazing
and candid conversation.
That's a wrap
on our three-part series
on love and logic.
For those who appreciate Waverly's insights and teachings,
be sure to explore the other two episodes of this series
if you enjoyed this finale.
And don't forget, there are 12 other guests featured in our show who have also embraced
tons of courage, love, and logic to own their true selves and navigate their diverse career paths.
If you like what you heard, please subscribe to our show.
Thanks again for listening. I'm your host, Vince Chan. Catch you next time.