Chit Chat Stocks - 6 Stocks For 2026
Episode Date: December 24, 2025On this episode of Chit Chat Stocks, we pick three stocks for 2026. These could be longs, shorts, stocks we already own, stocks on the top of our watchlists, or stocks we simply like for the upcoming ...calendar year. We discuss: (00:00) Introduction (06:18) Stock 1 (15:29) Stock 2 (25:34) Stock 3 (39:11) Stock 4 (47:56) Stock 5 (01:04:46) Stock 6 ***************************************************** Sign up for our stock research service, Emerging Moats: emergingmoats.com ********************************************************************* Chit Chat Stocks is presented by Interactive Brokers. Get professional pricing, global access, and premier technology with the best brokerage for investors today: https://www.interactivebrokers.com/ Interactive Brokers is a member of SIPC. ********************************************************************* Fiscal.ai is building the future of financial data. With custom charts, AI-generated research reports, and endless analytical tools, you can get up to speed on any stock around the globe. All for a reasonable price. Use our LINK and get 15% off any premium plan: https://fiscal.ai/chitchat ********************************************************************* Disclosure: Chit Chat Stocks hosts and guests are not financial advisors, and nothing they say on this show is formal advice or a recommendation. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to Chit Chat Stocks. On this show, hosts Ryan Henderson and Brett Schaefer analyze
businesses and riff on the world of investing. As a quick reminder, Chit Chat Stocks is a
CCM Media Group podcast. Anything discussed on Chit Chat Stocks by Ryan, Brett, or any
other podcast guest is not formal advice or recommendation. Now, please enjoy this episode.
Welcome into the Chit Chat Stocks podcast, a podcast to help you find your next great
investment. My name is Brett Schaefer, and as always, joined by Ryan Henderson. A little
behind the scenes, we're trying a new recording strategy. For anyone watching the video, I'm
actually using my phone for the camera. Hopefully, when we do the power hours, my video will be much
better now we don't need to go through all the details but let's just say we may have some
grievances against intel and their lack of capabilities 2025 for exactly listeners here
let me just say brett has had about a month of technical difficulties and we could not
figure out what the problem was lo and behold and and he went to argentina so there was a whole
bunch of questions raised primarily by me of the argentine uh internet speed no it is good old
intel's fault and exactly exactly but it's solved i have a new computer and we wouldn't have thought
it would have been the processing power on that it kind of was which is unfortunate but we have
it solved the film might even be a better filming technique we're talking today let's get into the
podcast. We're going through six stocks for 2026. Essentially, Ryan and I are picking three stocks
either that we own today on the watch list, potential short candidates. We have a mix and
a collective mix of all sorts of companies that we generally like for 2026. We'll go back and
forth. We'll choose some of these. I think we picked three stocks each. We're going to go
through about 10 minutes each to propose why it should either be on investors' radars, whether
we think it's going to be a buy at some point in 2026, whether we think it's a buy now.
It could be something that is not necessarily cheap today, but there could be some development
out there that we think could, okay, hey, it might dip 20% on the next earnings report.
If something like that happens, we might step in and make some purchases here.
I'll let Ryan talk, but first, some housekeeping items.
Again, as always, give us a review on Apple or Spotify or wherever and subscribe to the
show on YouTube.
I will tease that we have the Emerging Notes Stock Research Service.
Go subscribe to that in the show notes.
I will have my best buys for 2026.
Maybe some stocks that we talk about on this podcast, but some more on that newsletter.
That'll be coming out here shortly by around the first week of January, the last week of
December, depending on what the, just how it works out there.
And then lastly, this is very important for any listener of the podcast.
This is something you can do entirely for free.
We are doing a 2026 stock market competition along with our picks on this episode.
It's pretty easy.
All you're going to have to do is, again, sign up for the free tier of the Emerging
Moats Stock Research Service.
The link is directly in the show notes of this episode.
There is going to be a chat in the Substack app.
I think you have to download the app to use it.
Join the chat.
there will be a thread that I will start
that essentially allows anyone to
make a pick. You can make one pick on there.
I'll put any rules down. It's going to be
one stock starting January 1st.
Whoever can get the best stock
is going to win some
sort of prize.
We haven't decided yet
what it's going to be.
Chachat Stocks merch, maybe?
In any ways, you're at least
going to have bragging rights.
Potentially some other prizes down there. So go join.
It'll be fun. I think it'll spark some
really really fun discussion but we're going along in the intro here ryan maybe take through
any other rules i'm missing and we can have you go first what's your first stock on your six
stocks to buy for 2026 no i think you covered the intro well a little tease here for listeners
there is a short on this list as well which i don't think we've ever actually done an episode
where that was a top investment decision from us
and said so publicly.
So I'm going to tease it there, but I'll leave it at that.
My first company that we're going to be talking about today
is a stock I've been buying recently.
It is Airbnb.
Airbnb has nearly 10 million listings on its platform.
And I would somewhat controversially argue
that Airbnb is a monopoly, at least in the United States. A lot of people love to hate Airbnb and
there's, there seems to be a general trend among, I don't know if it's the investment community or
people. Maybe it's ages. It's like a boomer millennial thing. Yeah. Someone has a bad
Airbnb experience and then they become bearish about the stock. It's very common. It's like,
well you know you can't control the experience yes that that is the downsides potentially of a
marketplace like it is not a hotel but we're going to go through its growth versus the major hotel
chains and i think the evidence will become quite clear that it presents a better consumer value
proposition but they have truly carved out a market of their own in the united states uh and
the reason I would call them a monopoly is that roughly half of Airbnb's listings, I think more
in the United States, are exclusive to the Airbnb platform. If you go to booking holdings,
most of the listings on bookings are listed everywhere and not everywhere, but only 17%,
I think, according to a quick Gemini search, are exclusive on bookings. So they aren't listed on
many other platforms. So they have very unique supply. And ultimately, I think that's what's
going to drive the business in the long run. And I mentioned it, but they have carved out
a market in alternative accommodations here in the United States. And I can't see why the growing
demand for alternative accommodations that we've seen over the last decade would stop anytime soon.
So to put some numbers on it, and I put, this might be one of my favorite charts, honestly,
that I've ever made on fiscal, it is a comparison of Airbnb versus the three major hotel chains,
Marriott, Hyatt, and Hilton.
Brett's sharing the screen here, but it's in 2017, Airbnb was generating $2.6 billion
in revenue.
That was less than Marriott.
That was less than Hyatt.
That was less than Hilton.
All three of the major hotel chains were generating more revenue than Airbnb in 2017.
today airbnb is generating 11.1 billion i actually think it's higher that was the 2024 figure
which is almost more than all three of the hotel chains combined so they have this is like
streaming versus linear tv they have truly i think created a category of their own i help out a lot
I got a lot of GPV coming, coming to them as a, I mean, just think if you want to, it's not for everyone, but if you want to work and travel, Airbnbs are significantly better. Now, is it better for every vacation? No, but it is better for a growing amount of vacations and maybe they can incrementally make it better for almost every vacation over, over the next decade or two.
Yeah. I mean, if you look as a consumer, and I know some people might not agree with this, maybe they do it differently. Maybe they've got so many hotel points, they're stuck and they choose just their own hotel. But most people, especially people with families or people that are going somewhere with friends, they are checking Airbnb.
They're checking Airbnb to see if they can find an accommodation, depending on where they're going. And probably that has either completely replaced hotels in some cases, or they're at least comping it against hotels. And if it's a stay longer than a week, I would bet that you're almost exclusively looking on Airbnb or VRBO or booking holdings in other countries.
but in the United States, Airbnb has a very unique supply. So I really like the Airbnb model. I think
it's unique. I think there's a wide and expanding moat. More than 50% of the revenue also comes from
outside of North America and that figure should continue to climb. I don't think they necessarily
hit saturation here in the United States, but you're going to see much quicker listings growth
from their international markets europe asia south america as well new customers and then
the thing i like about this model is and brett maybe there's a particular on whether or not i'm
using this term correctly here but this is a really powerful network effect in my opinion
and maybe it's powerful marketplace whatever you want to call it i think in this case they actually
do have a network effect because you have to ask the question is every incremental host on the
platform does that make the experience better for every other one incremental host and two
incremental customer on the other side and i think that's true yeah i don't know if like
more hosts makes the platform better for other hosts but it certainly makes it better for
uh people looking for stays and every time someone else someone new looks for a stay
it's makes the platform better for hosts so yes it they have both sides of the marketplace
growing and both benefit each other that to me is very powerful right now they're generating 23
operating margins despite reinvesting a lot at the moment in some what i would call speculative
initiatives, frankly, but I see no reason why those operating margins can't grow over time.
For reference, Booking Holdings has 33% operating margins and Airbnb generates a much higher
percentage of their bookings directly through the app instead of paying for ads on Google.
So in theory, Airbnb should be able to have higher operating margins than booking as not just
matching their level as they scale. My projection is that they can grow booking volume by 12%
annually over the next five years. That might be aggressive. Maybe not. A lot of it hinges on the
international expansion. And it also sometimes depends on travel demand. Sometimes you see a
slowdown, but I think for the most part, I suspect 10 to 12% bookings growth is reasonable.
And then I would bet that, well, maybe I shouldn't say this. They have the potential for revenue growth to outpace bookings growth if they start to implement ads. And there's other things they can do as well that they can drive value beyond just booking fees.
but if they start to implement sponsored listings on the platform that's going to be just cherries
on top when it comes to my estimate so let's assume they don't because brian chesky has kind
of been on the fence about whether or not he would add sponsors sponsored listings to the platform
let's say they don't revenue grows by 12 a year operating margins hit 30 in five years maybe that
doesn't happen in five years you can kind of mess with the numbers as you'd like that would mean
they'd be generating 6.2 billion in annual operating income they've got a 72 billion
enterprise value today so that's just over 10 times 2030 earnings or operating income but keep
in mind they'd be printing cash over that time so they could either buy back shares they could
accumulate it on the balance sheet so the enterprise value would come down so i'm being
ultra conservative there. I'm usually looking for less than 10 times five year out earnings,
but for what I think is a very high quality business with an emerging moat. And in this case,
it's very easy to measure the emerging moat or listings growing. And they talk about it
frequently on conference calls. If listings are growing, the moat is widening. In my opinion,
I'm willing to pay a little extra and that's the case. And I'm very comfortable owning it here.
I do like you using the term emerging moats there, Ryan, because it is one that I'm going to be regularly covering in the emerging moats universe just on that newsletter.
I agree wholeheartedly here. It's one that the stocks run up a bit over the last, I think, two months or so.
And if it dips again, if we see some better pricing action, that's one that I would definitely be looking to adding to my position in 2026 or when I deposit more money into my account.
Now, let me use that too, unless you have anything else on Airbnb before we close out, Ryan.
No, I want to ask you if, because I know you're, I don't know if it's an actual long or a psychological long, but if-
Top five holding.
Okay.
Top five holding for me.
If Airbnb did not work out as an investment over the next five years, why do you think that'd be the case?
Expense management.
And three things come to mind immediately.
expense management which leads to like less just cash flow conversion true cash flow conversion
that they can turn to buybacks return to shareholders the share count actually hasn't
come down that much over the last few years even though they plowed money into the buyback kind of
like that the change where it's been a bit of a buyback to nowhere the second thing is a total
bust on these new services and experiences i think it's likely not going to be a total bust but i
could see it being underwhelming that's not what i'm too concerned about what i think i'm really
concerned about is what we'd maybe call tepid growth, where you outline 12% growth. I think
that's reasonable. I think that is something they can hit. But if it's 5%, we're probably not going
to get a very good return. And then in the short run, I think clearly if there's a travel recession,
this is a discretionary company and they will get hit more. So temporarily, that could impact
the business honestly over the long term i think the downside for this type of business since it
has such a wide moat is is is more of like it kind of maybe underperforms the market treads water
which really given the valuation today it makes me okay when i sell my business i want the best
tax and investment advice i want to help my kids and i want to give back to the community
Ooh, then it's the vacation of a lifetime.
I wonder if my head of office has a forever setting.
An IG Private Wealth Advisor creates the clarity you need
with plans that harmonize your business, your family, and your dreams.
Get financial advice that puts you at the center.
Find your advisor at IGPrivateWealth.com.
It's comfortable taking it as a larger position in the portfolio.
Yeah, I think those are all fair risks.
What is your number one stock?
I'm looking at it now.
It's an old flame of ours.
You want to go through it?
If you're a regular listener to Chit Chat Stocks,
then you know that we love investing in international stocks
and no brokerage compares to interactive brokers,
otherwise known as IBKR, when it comes to international trading.
You can easily trade assets worldwide using a multi-currency IBKR account
in 160 markets, 36 countries, and 28 currencies with low fees. Compare that to your existing
brokerage and its limited trading ability and high fees on foreign exchange. There truly is
no comparison. Trade stocks, options, futures, currencies, and bonds globally with IBKR's
unified brokerage platform. I wouldn't use any other brokerage for my investing needs. Switch
to IBKR and level up your international trading game today. If you're interested in checking them
out for yourself, head on over to IBKR.com. Interactive Brokers is a member of SIPC.
That's right. Sprouts Farmer's Market, one that I recently did a write-up on,
on the Emerging Moats newsletter. It's the first pick here. It is coming back onto my watch list,
and actually I did, as a full disclosure, make an investment into the stock. I think either in
November or earlier this month. It's not a large position, but I got back into it after many years
of having it on the launch list. And really, it's because the stock has fallen 55% in 2025 from high.
It's pretty much fallen straight down this year. Shares now trade back in EV to EBIT, which for
any listener that doesn't know that term, that's enterprise value, essentially close to market cap
and netting out cash and debt divided by their earnings before interest and taxes, which is
essentially operating income. And their EV to EBIT is down to 14. Now, the natural organics
attributes-based grocery store, it still has room to grow its revenue, I think, at a 10% plus rate
and earnings per share at a 15% plus rate over the next five years, if not 10. Now, we need to
dissect a few things to see how I get to those numbers, but we need to discuss their revenue
growth opportunity. They currently have 464 locations with its highest density regions in
Southern California, Arizona, Texas, and Florida. They still have room to expand their store count
there, but not as much as other areas around the country or places where they don't have any
locations at all. They've started moving slowly up the East Coast and then into the New York area.
They're planning to move into the Midwest soon. I think they maybe are moving into Chicago here
shortly. And they have a goal of hitting a rate of 10% annual unit count growth. They've fallen
short of that, but they think they're going to hit it in 2026, which I tend to just believe
because they have the real estate pipeline. It takes two to three years to actually find a
location and then get a store open. I think there is likely room for at least 1,000 of these
grocery stores around the country. I think it's probably more likely that saturation is closer
to 2,500 locations. You have to ask, okay, well, there's Costco, there's Amazon, there's Walmart,
there's the Kroger's of the world. Why do Sprouts succeed? Because it is differentiated from the
ultra cheap grocery chains, the basic goods places, which you would say is a Kroger or the
dozens of equivalents out there. And they also have enough of organic or healthy food focus
compared to Amazon, Costco, or Walmart, where you get that shopper. It's not going to be the
primary grocery store for everyone. It might be a secondary grocery store, similar to a Trader Joe's.
it is targeting around what they estimate is about 20% of the US population. That is one
wealthier, focused on health and focused on specific dietary needs. And what they want
is that at a reasonable price. Now, Sprout's comp store sales growth tells us that the rest
of the revenue story. In fact, if you pull up the quarterly comp store sales growth chart on
Fiscal.ai, I'd say, use the link in the show notes, we'll get you a discount on any subscription
there. It really tells the entire story of the stock since the pandemic. When new leadership
came in, Sprouts was able to right the ship on their comp store sales growth, both improving
this while improving EBIT margins. So previously, they were kind of doing heavy discounts.
A lot of stuff wasn't working, but the new leadership came in. They basically got the
current strategy that I outlined above, and they were able to hit their comp store sales growth
goal of around 3%, which is what they had outlined long-term. However, late last year,
so 2024 and early 2025, I think due to improved marketing, a little launching of this loyalty
program, better treasure hunt items, maybe they're doing well in some of these new areas,
their comp store sales growth accelerated from 3% to 4% up to 12%. And they said it was as high
13% in one month. That is going to lead to very, very strong stock outperformance. That's why the
stock went up about 10x in a couple of years and just absolutely took off in late 2024.
Now let's come back to Earth. They're lapping the numbers from last year, which is leading to low
guidance in Q4 2025 and the first half of 2026. Stock fell on the news, but I don't really think
it hurts the long-term trajectory of the brand. I think if you look at a two-year comp chart,
they're going to be doing like 7% in 2024, 7% this year, and maybe 3% in 2026. I think that's
totally fine, especially when it's going to be growing in line with inflation with a stable
EBIT margin. And I think there's reasons to believe they can keep building up this brand
and getting decent comp store sales figures of kind of that maybe 2% to 5%
over the long term. They can keep pushing the brand of organic attribute, which is like
vegetarian, paleo, keto, that type of stuff, and then healthy food at a reasonable price.
They have improved their local supply chains to make distribution fresher and unique by partnering
with local farmers, so that differentiates themselves from the Kroger's of the world.
And they've started to roll out a loyalty program to drive further growth. They are winning with
attribute-based diets. The new leadership team has done a lot of the quote-unquote
blocking and tackling, which is simple stuff to improve shrink, which is stuff people don't know.
and then just store efficiencies with things like self-checkout.
So, that all leads me to believe that they can do 10% plus revenue growth
through these unit count expansion,
plus an average of a 3% comp store sales growth annually.
Now, when it comes to margins,
if they keep growing comp store sales at the same level as their input costs,
they should have stable to growing EBIT margin
with increasing operating leverage on their overhead costs.
But if you go back to my original thought, I believe they can get 15% plus earnings per share
growth. And that comes from taking this maybe stable to slight margin, 10% plus revenue growth,
and adding in this hefty buyback program that not all net income is going to buybacks because they
need to keep reinvesting to open new stores. However, all excess cash flow is going to be
used to repurchase shares unless the stock ends up working really quickly from here and they
It's traded at an unreasonable price.
Again, last 12-month free cash flow is pushing $500 million on an $8 billion market cap.
Just do that yield.
It's pretty good.
If Sprouts Farmers Market keep taking down its share outstanding, we should be able to
see 15% plus shareholder returns simply from its earnings per share growth with no consideration
to multiple expansion.
I think it's probably fair.
They probably deserve to trade at 15 times at maturity.
right now I think they probably deserve to trade it 20 to 30 times
you know why am I watching this stock in 2026
well it's one I already own
and the other two stocks is one I'm short and one I'm on my watch list
but I think if
they see some
bad comp store sales for the first half of
2026 that could lead to some more
stock price deterioration if the guidance is slightly
weak to what they are thinking yeah maybe you know
that could hurt him uh in the near term and i'd want to maybe buy some more shares so it's high
on the watch list for now took another position and i definitely like the stock for this year at
least as i mentioned here the first half might be bad but i think once we get to the second half
things will be normalized outside of that abnormal 12 13 comp growth period
yeah i don't know what people were expecting i it seems if you think that you found a grocery
store that's going to maintain 12 comp store sales and grow their store base that should be
your whole portfolio especially at this price so right i mean costco does like six right and
they're just the best in class yeah it's i think it's a unique concept it's a simple enough business
to understand logistically it's complex to have a massive nationwide grocery chain but
i i could see how this easily works out for shareholders i think comp sales i agree should
i see no reason why they couldn't be three to five percent on when we annualize it over the
next decade if we're looking back i could see that happening the one area where i see them
may be underperforming is store count expansion but i'm okay with that i would much rather they
grow store count seven percent or six percent and they maintain quality as opposed to
growing so fast they fall forward over their skis which so far they've deferred to maintaining
store quality part of that's because of supply chain issues but i think i'm okay with it
Yeah, that's not the end of the world.
I mean, it's going to slow down earnings per share growth,
but I totally understand that sentiment.
Let's go to your second stock here.
It's one that you, let's say, slightly been pounding the table on.
It's considered an AI loser.
It's one that's turned into a bit of a battleground stock.
Ryan, why don't you introduce your second company here, Adobe.
Yeah, and one more thing on Sprouts Farmer's Market real quick.
it is the opposite of Airbnb. It's not consumer discretionary. Grocery spending is quite resilient
even in tough times. So even if you have a recession or a pullback, I think generally
you're still going to see people go into the grocery store. But my second stock, you mentioned
it, it shockingly has become a battleground stock because I would argue for the better part of the
last two decades it's been considered like a bulletproof compounder the company is adobe
right now the narrative around adobe reminds me or it feels like the narrative that was
surrounding alphabet in early 2025 maybe not as stark but there seems to be a collective belief
that Adobe will be disrupted by AI and it primarily comes from two angles. So the first one
is text-to-image or text-to-video models making the need for video and photo editing software
obsolete. Adobe's creative software suite, there's a lot to it if you buy the whole bundle,
but a big part of it is video photo editing and some of the workflows around that.
so and the second one i should say is startups and i shouldn't even call them startups anymore
but most notably figma and canva putting a dent in adobe's creative software mode that's those
are kind of the two risks one of them is an ai risk i would say adobe and fig or figma and canva
that's not really an ai risk per se because if the idea is that text to image and text to video
obsoletes the need for photo editing then figma and canva would be at risk as well but let's
address the first one basically ai obsoleting the need for video and photo editing i think this is
pretty unlikely you can create some cool stuff with mid journey i've had a mid journey subscription
for a while and mid journey for those that don't know is like you type it in it puts out the image
you want it's what uh if you're familiar with quarter the trans uh transcript audio platform
on mobile and i guess it's on web as well they uh they use mid journey for all their creatives
and they do a good job but it's for it's the first step i think it gets you 90 of the way there i
think it helps for inspiration and i think it is really useful but still the last mile lives on a
video or photo editing tool i i could not create the final product that i wanted on mid journey
maybe i'm bad at it but i still had to go use photo editing uh software so the last mile is
still still remains an issue that was this we had this conversation a year ago and it was like
ai is going to replace photo editing but the last mile is currently the problem we're a year forward
now and last mile is still the problem and i think it's hard to get there and you probably
witness this when you watch like an ai video if you're scrolling your feed and you see an ai video
on social media the moment you perceive like there's something off right like you can tell
it's AI somewhat quickly. If you want to go from making people believe that it was completely
manually created or edited, touched up and not just AI, it takes something beyond just the models
themselves. The other part is I don't see this changing for enterprise customers anytime soon,
which is the majority of Adobe's customer base. Just to be clear, Adobe's customer base,
enterprise adobe's revenue base enterprise
there is like if you're just a solo creator and you just need something spun up quickly
and it's not that controversial you're not in a marketing department whatever maybe you're an
admin at a high school or whatever and you want to post an animation for one of your players you
can spin that up with ai your job's not at risk for that if you're in the marketing department
an enterprise company, it's different. So I think they're going to be okay. And then not to mention
Adobe has partnered with most AI models. So you can use your preferred model within Firefly if
you're choosing to do that. And then you've got all the workflow tools right around it. And they
actually are seeing a lot of their customers adopt that. So they're kind of integrating it well,
in my opinion. And then as for the second threat, Figma and Canva, this is one where I don't really
know what to think because i'm a canva user i'm a figma user and i think they're both really good
tools uh so canva let's take this one first canva is an awesome tool it's great for small businesses
great for solopreneurs it seems like an easier tool to adopt for someone who's maybe not used
to it didn't go to marketing classes in college whatever isn't used to the adobe suite it's kind
of lower barriers to entry and that's kind of why they've won uh at least on the smaller business
side of things they are now a three and a half billion dollar revenue business so it's big um
however adobe is still crucial within enterprises i already mentioned this
they enterprises need the interoperability between tools and different departments and
a company often relies on multiple adobe products so you see this i saw this basic uh i don't know
if it was fake or not um but someone was saying his cfo came to him and was like i need you to
audit our subscriptions this year and survey survey the enter survey all the departments
what what software do they use all that stuff and he said no i'm not surveying it and he deleted
the spreadsheet canceled the cards and then he says the first ones that people come to me with
whoever comes complaining the quickest as soon as people complain i'll resubscribe and this might
have been fiction but i think it illustrates the point and if people don't mention it for three or
four months we don't need that software he said immediately when he canceled it the market
department marketing department came running for adobe the sales department came running for their
crm and then there was some hr software that no one talked about and they inevitably canceled
the subscription it could have been bs i like this was an anonymous account but it illustrates
the point the you when you are in a marketing department you live on this software you live
on adobe and you get used to it and there's huge switching costs especially with creative
software i think it's the same with autodesk you don't want to retrain on something else
as for figma figma has actually sort of one i shouldn't say one because adobe xd still gets
used but it's more of a point solution so people that don't know figma it's sort of a you user
experience user interface design tool where it really helps go from design to development
so apparently developers really love it it makes it the process much more seamless
and it's a good tool it's leader in the industry but it's smaller it's less than a billion dollars
in revenue and then i was thinking like canva was founded in 2013 figma was founded in 2012
what has happened since that point well over the last four years just the last four years
not the last decade the last decade adobe's doubled its revenue and more but over the last
four years adobe has added six billion dollars in new digital media revenue that's two they've
added two canvas in revenue in the last four years if these were true like substitutes they
wouldn't add an additional six billion dollars in revenue i know some people are going to say
oh they're mortgaging their moat they're raising their prices that would have that would have hit
them that for sure would have hit them if there wasn't high switching costs with these products
and canva was a true substitute they wouldn't have doubled their revenue over the last decade
so the i guess the problem i have and the problem i run into is i'm a big believer in canva i really
like the tool i'm a big believer in figma really like the tool i think they all have promise
but i think the switching costs for adobe are enormous and right now they traded an ev to ebit
of 17 times which is basically the lowest and i think since the great financial crisis i think
they had a lower multiple but i see a path for them to continue to grow revenue more than 10
a year i see a path for operating margins to continue to expand
it seems to me like it's kind of not necessarily a home run but it's a slam dunk and sort of a
one-foot hurdle here where you're going to get above market returns and it doesn't feel like
are taking a ton of risk to do it.
Okay, when I sell my business,
I want the best tax and investment advice.
I want to help my kids
and I want to give back to the community.
Ooh, then it's the vacation of a lifetime.
I wonder if my head of office has a forever setting.
An IG Private Wealth Advisor
creates the clarity you need
with plans that harmonize your business,
your family, and your dreams.
Get financial advice that puts you at the center.
Find your advisor at IGPrivateWealth.com.
say, an Autodesk or maybe even a Salesforce or what have you, all those other ones out
there in the enterprise software space that might be cheap.
Even when he talked about money.com, Adobe has that consistent history of share repurchases.
And I think given the lower share price today, you know, it's just the math works out.
It's going to be more attractive.
So that could help even if you don't get a multiple re-rating, it's even better over
the long term.
All right, folks, before we move on, we need to tell you where we get our data.
Fiscal.ai.
Fiscal.ai is the complete stock research platform for fundamental investors.
I use the platform pretty much every single day.
You'll see the charts in our podcast.
You'll see it in our newsletter.
This is our one-stop shop for stock research.
They've got up to 20 years of financial data on all companies globally, including the largest company-specific segment and KPI data set on the internet.
That includes metrics like Duolingo's daily active users, Oracle's backlog, Rocket Lab's revenue per launch, and literally millions more data points.
They've also got earnings call transcripts, ownership data, equity research reports, and much, much more.
If you want complete financial data at your fingertips, you need to check out Fiscal.ai.
And if you use our link, fiscal.ai slash chitchat, you will automatically get two weeks of Fiscal Pro for free, no card required.
If you want to upgrade, our link will also get you 15% off.
Again, that's fiscal.ai slash chitchat.
The link will be in our show notes.
If you regularly listen to Chitchat Stocks, then we know you love analyzing individual
companies.
We do too.
That is why I, Brett Schaefer, co-host of the show, decided to start writing the Emerging
Moats Stock Research Service.
Emerging Moats produces regular stock research reports on companies with emerging competitive
advantages, regular updates on stocks I own and on my watch list, and has full transparency to
my portfolio transactions and returns. I cover under-the-radar emerging moat companies with
prior research reports on Oscar Health, Kraken Robotics, The Real Brokerage, and much more.
Emails will be sent out on a weekly basis. Explore the service today and find your next
great stock by going to emergingmoats.com. The link will be in the show notes.
yeah at this point they're spending all of their free cash flow and then some on share repurchases
literally i think it's been like 110 roughly of their free cash flow has been allocated towards
buybacks over the last 12 months and it's happening at record low multiples so it's not
like they're just doing this blindly i actually think they're doing it i think it's a good use
capital and i could see a world where the cfo is looking at the management team's looking at
their business and thinking like we continue to add more customers we continue to add more seats
and our enterprise users are there i bet their churns like their full logo churn is probably
less than like two percent a year a max it's got to be like service now levels
and i bet they're wondering like what the hell are people thinking like let's just buy back and
i actually appreciate that so we'll i mean i could be wrong but let's let's move forward
we are going behind the timer here i'll go through mine my second stock here is a stock i've never
owned it's one i've found generally to be too expensive for my value investor brain but now
stock is only up 15 in the last five years and the business has been compounding away at a very
very nice rate i think it is now an interesting opportunity to potentially start a position in
2026 this dog is mercado libre people know the what would you call the amazon and paypal slash
venmo of latin america would that be the way to describe it it's amazon plus used to be the ebay
now it's to be the ebay it's a mix of both now they're moving into a lot of different things
First, I'll say what you think about the business is exactly what it is anecdotally.
It is the premier e-commerce player, at least in Argentina and a few other places I've been.
Nobody talks about a competitor, but a few other things I'll talk about because people understand why Amazon has a wide competitive advantage of white wings.
But I'll talk about why in Latin America specifically compared to the United States, maybe East Asia,
there are a few things that can give it an edge moat-wise compared to the other analogous
businesses. One is there's the difficulty of delivery infrastructure versus other areas like
the United States. Addresses are more difficult. Roads are more difficult. There is no UPS
generally. Trust me, I figured this out firsthand trying to get something delivered. It's much,
much more difficult. Second is the lack of big box retailers in person. You are not competing
with Costco. You're not competing with Walmart, for the most part. You're not competing with
Best Buy. They're much easier competitors to get a better value proposition versus.
And third is layering on the fintech. In Argentina, pretty much every single merchant uses a Mercado
Pago pay machine for merchants. And it is also a way to just send money without using
a debit or credit card, which feels to me like quite an entrenched business in this economy.
Look, I think MercadoLibre, without going into the details of what makes a vertically integrated
e-commerce business a wide moat, I think it is clearly a wide moat business today.
One, there are political concerns, such as what happened to their business in Venezuela a few
years ago they had to pull out of the market it was probably dumb to enter that market in the
first place when you knew that it was a crazy socialist government but there are they also
have that risk in other places i mean latin america has general political uncertainty you're
seeing a huge wave of more conservative business friendly governments in the country but five years
from now it could totally flip or not sorry in the region in multiple countries you also have
some competition from NewBank on the financial services side. That's a long-term concern,
I think, and probably their biggest competitor by a long shot within fintech. But with 600 million
people, I think there's room for multiple winners here. And they also serve slightly different
customer value propositions, where NewBank is more of a SoFi or an ally for someone,
and Mercado Pago is almost more merchant-related stuff.
It's more comprehensive fintech offerings.
It's more than just banking.
It's almost payments and that sort of thing.
Overall, though, it's a wide-moat stock,
and I think it still has a durable runway to grow.
And what do the recent numbers look like?
If you look at our three largest markets,
35% FX neutral growth in Brazil,
42% growth in Mexico,
97% growth in Argentina.
That's partly because of that currency stuff.
but still very, very strong growth. 65% growth in fintech, 49% FX neutral revenue growth in total
for MercadoLibre. Now in USD terms, which is what I care about, still 39%. So not bad. And right now,
MercadoLibre trades at a market cap of $100 billion, EV to gross profit of eight, EV to EBIT
of 30, while likely severely under-earning versus their long-term potential. There are still some
things research-wise I need to hammer out for them. One, the loan book, lending business in
general. Two, is the long-term plan for management. It's not a stock I've taken a deep dive in yet,
although it's on the list for the schedule for Q1 2026 for emerging moats research.
But I like the tailwinds of the business. General e-com penetration in Latin America,
I think there's a long runway to grow there. You have the recovery of the Argentina economy,
one of their largest markets. This is more of a wildcard situation, but the potential
for regime change in Venezuela and the overall capitalist turn in South America and Central
America. I mean, look, if I can get a good grip on what long-term margins will look like,
I think this could be a solid pick in 2026 and one I want to study more in the coming years.
In other words, we look at the numbers today, they're doing $26 billion in revenue. I think
they can probably get to $100 billion in revenue and maybe a 20% operating margin at scale.
So remember, fintech is going to have much better margins
than the e-commerce part of the business.
That's $20 billion in operating income
versus $100 billion market cap today.
I think that probably would deserve to trade
at a $500 billion market cap for 25 times earnings.
Can they get there in five years?
Maybe.
Maybe it takes seven, but however many years it takes,
I think you can get a 5X return
plus any excess cash flow generation return to shareholders.
Share dilution has generally not been that bad.
all in all it feels like a good buying opportunity for a stock that hasn't got anywhere for five
years but the business keeps compounding management is great and the moat keeps as we'll talk about
all the time keeps emerging and it keeps widening i think what i find encouraging and i read this
from our latin american correspondent ian bezak but you also just kind of confirmed it here
in your notes. So I read the stat that MercadoLibre is the only public company in the world
that has grown revenue by more than, I think it was more than 30% year over year for 22 consecutive
quarters. And they've done it for 27 consecutive quarters. So they have sustained a 30% growth
rate for the longest of any public company. And at first I think, all right, well, how long can
that really last something that ian alluded to people don't really appreciate how large the
reinvestment runway still is in latin america and in some of their more dominant countries and
i think you can probably attest to it now i would guess there's still a huge infrastructure
reinvestment runway for them that's fair i'm not a user of the service because you have to be a
uh you have to have some sort of local bank account but i think we can safely say the number
one choice is the one thing if you ask someone hey where can i get this oh mercado libre uh
well i have to ask you to buy it for me but that's a whole different story we've talked about that
with brian stoffel when we had him on to assess the stock i think earlier in 2025 if not recently
just look it up it'll be in our feed he talked about how he lives in more rural part of costa
Rica. MercadoLibre is really the only company that can get to him and has that information,
has this huge database of where people are, where the accounts are. It takes a lot to build up over
time. And then for one, the delivery infrastructure, yeah, they have a long runway to grow.
I mean, so does Amazon still, but if MercadoLibre is like 10, 15 years behind them, that gives them
still a huge reinvestment runway to move to the third-party services, kind of replicate a lot of
what made Amazon great in the United States. All right, let's talk my third stock for today.
This one will be a little quicker. My third top stock for 2026 is none other than Amazon. We just
mentioned them. Amazon was and is the worst performing big tech stock in 2025. And it's,
I think it's up 3% year to date. So it's really not that bad, but there's
Every other big tech stock, I'm not including Tesla, is up more than 10% year to date.
I've said this before, and I will say it again.
I think Amazon has the widest moat in the world.
And if you can find the right entry points, businesses like Amazon are incredibly easy to own.
They make life easy because when you read the conference calls, I remember thinking,
i thought this was google for a long time i was like every time i read the conference call i just
thought why don't i own this why don't i own this they're talking about like seven platforms with
billions of users but amazon they're talking about delivering 90 plus in less than one day
and no one's catching them they're talking about i believe it's if i'm not mistaken they're the
largest revenue business in the world now okay unless walmart still hasn't beat but i think
amazon finally surpassed them yeah they're about 700 billion dollars if they're not if they're
third or something like that look 700 billion dollars that's huge you just you you think about
the scale you think about all the levers they have to pull to improve their marketplace and improve
their uh profit margins and it just is a very very easy business to own and you are kind of
amazed when you read their conference calls usually uh that's been the case for me for a
long time i haven't been a shareholder but this year for the first time i became a shareholder
of amazon i'm going to go through i guess the three points and the three reasons why i am very
comfortable owning Amazon here. So number one, and this is important, probably the most important
part for me, the e-commerce moat is very much still intact. The infrastructure and logistics
advantage is the engine that powers Amazon across the board. In my opinion, it powers
their subscription revenue. It powers their third-party seller services. It powers their
advertising revenue and it also powers the e-commerce sales itself so their first party
sales and their third party sales like that everything minus aws feeds off of the infrastructure
advantage that amazon has built that still feels like it's getting wider every quarter they talk
about how they are still improving delivery speeds it's the first thing jassy brags about
every time like here's how much we were able to bring down delivery times
as long as they continue to do that and continue to widen that advantage
i am happy and i'm noticing it we are recording this right before christmas
i am a late gift buyer every year i make the mistake i don't buy things in advance enough
i can only buy from one platform and have it get here in time every other platform is still so far
behind as soon as i see the dang shop pay button i have to get off the website i have to go
somewhere else because i'm not going to wait and it's not nothing against shopify because they're
not the ones delivering this but i'm not going to wait two weeks for a package to be delivered
you trust amazon they have built up like a 10-year logistics advantage and no one's even close really
to catching up with them so that moat is still very much intact the second part is that the
higher margin businesses, and I'm counting for, when I say higher margin, I'm talking about
subscription revenues, advertising revenues, third-party seller services, and AWS, those four
segments. Those now account for 59% of the overall business or 59% of the overall revenue. And that
figure continues to grow. As long as that percentage continues to grow, I see no reason
why amazon can't hit 15 operating margins within five years the third one for me aws is still the
largest cloud provider and maintains a massive runway for growth cloud computing is extremely
sticky especially for larger enterprises and i think this year there's been such a shift to ai
workloads and so much talk about that and so much buzz, and you saw big years out of
Microsoft and Google Cloud, Azure and Google Cloud, I should say, that people seem to forget
that AWS is still the largest in the industry by a long shot.
There is still some runway for existing enterprise workloads to migrate to the cloud.
It's not as, you're not going to see as much of that as you did over the last decade.
I think I saw a rough stat that 75%, 70, 75% of existing enterprise workloads are run on the cloud.
But importantly, cloud is enabling new workloads to be built faster.
Fiscal AI is an example.
We, it would be such a nightmare.
It would have taken us 10 years longer probably to build our business.
10?
Okay. When I sell my business, I want the best tax and investment advice.
I want to help my kids, and I want to give back to the community.
Ooh, then it's the vacation of a lifetime.
I wonder if my head of office has a forever setting.
An IG Private Wealth Advisor creates the clarity you need with plans that harmonize your business, your family, and your dreams.
Get financial advice that puts you at the center.
Find your advisor at IGPrivateWealth.com.
you're making it wouldn't have taken 10 years longer the value purpose is not that it's better
there's a reason everyone's switching but let's not get over our skis here
i i honestly believe it or maybe we wouldn't even have pursued the opportunity if cloud
computing wasn't available you have businesses being built now because cloud computing and ai
workloads are making it possible. I think they will, AWS specifically, I think can sustain a 10%
plus annual revenue growth rate over the next decade. The one boogeyman with Amazon, and it
seems like this is what investors are fixated on, and probably rightfully so, is the accounting
treatment for depreciation of GPUs. Right now, they are seeing the widest divergence between
operating income and free cash flow in their history due to primarily the build out of their
AI data centers. So if you look at operating income, 76 billion over the last 12 months,
free cash flow is 11 billion it's it's a huge spread now a lot of that is dependent
on or i should say future gap operating margins are dependent on whether or not the useful lives
of gpus are legitimate if the useful lives of gpus are overstated right now
they probably will not be hitting 15 operating margins in five years if they are what they say
they are i see no reason why they can't hit that 15 threshold so i personally am of the belief
that these
i'm willing to take it at face value i'm willing to believe that the
gpus are have a useful life that the accounting departments say they do i could be wrong on that
but i'm willing to take it at face value to put it all together
i think they could generate 11 annual revenue growth over the next five years
that would put them at 1.2 trillion dollars in revenue which is kind of a wild figure to say
out loud but i don't see what's stopping them from getting there 15 operating margins on that
would give them 186 billion actually in operating income i had 185 here but it's 186 enterprise
value right now is two and a half trillion so ev to five year out earnings 13 times it's a little
expensive but i again i'm not including the cash build-up or repurchases which would probably be
more like maybe there's a slight share reduction but i think more likely it's reinvestment which
would hopefully power i think i think the sharegrounds could arise yeah i think you're
right but what what what do you suspect they do with the cash on hand waste it like they usually
do the one thing i'll add here i would not all right if you go back over the last 20 years i
think they've built some pretty valuable businesses with the cash they've alexa fire phone the largest
cloud computer business in the world um various other things project kuiper which seems to be
going nowhere look yeah they could for all five of those they have an aws yeah yeah that's fine
look the in 2026 they could generate the most operating income of any business in the in the
world maybe excluding i don't know what saturday romco does but of the mag 7 they could be number
one if they wanted to and they don't they just simply don't they're getting a little better
with these layoffs, a little bit more expense discipline, but they could do $750 billion
in revenue, eventually a trillion in revenue with a 20% operating margin if they wanted to.
But, and I agree the stock's cheap here, but I think my biggest risk is that they just waste
money on the dumbest things. It's dumber than Meta's stuff. Meta just is public with it.
And expecting, I guess, the one thing that, again,
makes me nervous on Amazon is just doing the same thing
or having different expectations when something's happening
over and over and over again is the definition of insanity.
Whatever that saying is, I think people have heard that one before.
Why would I expect Amazon to change?
That's one thing that I think is a big risk for the stock
because I agree that your numbers make complete sense.
15% operating margin, I think it'd be higher.
$1.2 trillion in revenue,
yeah, it's probably reasonable
given the international exposure as well,
how the e-commerce business can keep compounding,
AWS can keep compounding,
subscriptions can keep compounding.
But that consolidated operating margin,
what's it going to be?
I'm just not sure.
yeah the one i guess i i know you don't love the call it moon shots that they have
some of them i don't even think are moon shots but they're they're wasteful areas
when you look at the cap x the vast majority of the cap x is going towards
things that are widening their modes expansion of aws expansion of their fulfillment advantage
Some of the operating expenses, I would bet most of the operating expenses are going towards those moat whiteners as well. But yes, a small piece of their reinvestments are going towards these.
Okay, then why is an operating margin 20% right now?
You have it here.
What was the percentage again for the listeners?
59% of revenue is coming from AWS advertising subscriptions
and third-party seller services,
which should lead to, from that,
those combined should have 25% operating,
same in level margins.
Where's the spend?
Where's it going?
towards developer salaries for some of these projects that's i know but that's
those four segments are 59 of revenue and should are we going to timestamp this for let's say 10
years from now project kuiper was very useful for them as a business and it was a worthwhile
endeavor sure yeah i i they're they're just their their track record of moonshots is way worse than
people giving credit for just because aws was so good compared to maybe meta is just as bad
but compared to everyone else maybe especially alphabet it's just track records poor
maybe but i think the world will continue to value them on what they are capable of earning
They're not right now.
Ah.
Well, if they were measuring them on free cash flow,
it would be a very different valuation.
I just have made the prediction that they have finished
with the largest market cap in the world two years in a row.
And I've just been disappointed on the margin expansion.
I just, I'm not, I'm going to lower my expectations.
Yeah.
This is not the one I'm the most excited about of the list.
And actually, there's some others that weren't on this list that I'm more excited about. But I do believe it's the widest moat in the world. That seems to be reinforced in my brain every holiday season. And if I'm able to make the numbers work on what I think is the widest moat, I feel like I should own some. I'm not going to make a huge chunk of my portfolio. I have the same frustrations. And I have heard anecdotally that it's day two at Amazon.
They say that because they were given, these employees were given daycare for $200,000, $400,000 salaries to do basically three hours of work a day on jobs that were three times duplicated.
I'm sorry, that era's over.
The company was run at 0% margin, and it was wasteful spend, hundreds of billions of dollars cumulatively.
I'm sorry, that was a gift, and now it's done.
shareholders are going to matter.
I don't think that means it's day two.
But they've been at the forefront
of getting people back into the office,
early layoffs.
Oh no, we got to go back to the office.
Oh no.
No, but you're saying that they are worse
than the other big tech companies.
Look at the, on the income statement, yes.
Now they do a lot of lip service on layoffs,
but I just wonder, okay,
you're doing all these expense management things.
Why is it not showing up?
They went from 0% operating margins to 9% in the span of like two years.
Yeah, okay.
It should be higher.
I think.
Sure.
But I think if you were running the team's P&L,
I think they would have a fraction of the revenue that they do today.
They would have a fraction of the business success and customers.
Because it requires-
Yeah, I'm not Andy Jassy.
All right.
But it's been operating margin was at a decimal on fiscal.
It's all right.
Last 12 months, December 2024, 10.8%.
Now, last 12 months, last quarter, it's been 11.
We've seen four quarters of staying in operating margin expansion.
I think that's why the stock has not done well this year.
Now, if that reverses, because it did in December 2022 go from 2.4% to the end of 2024, 11%,
if that trajectory continues next year, then the stock probably does quite well.
But if I was an Amazon shareholder, which frankly I've never been, I would be frustrated
over the last year.
What's happening?
Why are all the high margin businesses growing and solid operating margin is going nowhere?
we'll see how 2026 plays out let's i know we've gone long on this one so let's finish with your
third one for the day what is it yeah this one should be pun intended not too long because it
is a short it is a stock that had been short for most of 2025 i think it's either april or may
cost basis is a little bit of a loss right now it is palantir technologies i wanted to include it
on this list to spice things up. Put a short in here. It's definitely a bit of a battleground
stock. First, let me discuss how I've developed a small shorting strategy and what I do to avoid
blowing up. First, I only short diversified portfolio. You're not going to make something
a huge percentage of your entire portfolio. And second, if a stock has a chance to turn
into a quote unquote meme stock, just a chance to 10x, if it has a tiny market gap, it's hyped
narrative, which is really a lot. It's kind of the pure, without swearing, ESCOs that you can find,
the bad companies. It was something like that, size is extremely small. But for Palantir,
market cap today is over $400 billion. I do not see it as a giant threat to 10x in a year.
So it's going to be a little bit bigger of a position. And it's one where I'm comfortable.
Now, is that a huge percentage of my entire portfolio? No, my short book is about 10%
of the size of my long book. But why am I short Palantir? Really comes down to a few reasons.
First, this is one that you can't just solely base a short position on, is valuation. But for this
one, it's pretty damn extreme. I've called it the most overvalued stock ever. Stock trades at over
100 times trailing sales, I think about 113 as of this writing. Look, this is going to be a massive
head went? Simple.
Especially with shareholder dilution
coming down the pipeline.
And frankly, what helps
is that right now they have a buyback to nowhere.
They've bought back stock
at these levels, which
goes to show
what's going on here.
Let's just go through some quick math. Let's say they 10x
revenue, plus
a little more, and their price to sales comes down
to 10. Let's say there is no
further shareholder dilution,
which is a bit delusional.
but let's say that it doesn't happen and let's say they convert just to paint a picture here
if they 10x sales from here they'll be the largest software company in the world by revenue which
they are not probably excluding microsoft but pure like pure play sass yeah yeah like look it's almost
to say like they'd have to be as big as microsoft office okay maybe yeah good goal 10 years maybe
five years you can do that. And let's say they convert 40% of revenue to net income,
which I think is unlikely. It's maybe less, it's maybe the most likely out of all these,
but still that's best in class margin. If all these happen, which aren't going to happen within
the next five years, the stock is going to trade at 25 times earnings. Expectations are massive and
extremely unlikely to be fulfilled. Now, second is the company will be entering a rough comparison
in 2026 after this AI super cycle of spending. Revenue growth, I mean, look, this business is
good. Revenue growth has accelerated. One, that it's a business that's taken advantage of the AI
deployment narrative. They won hundreds of contracts, large and small, with enterprises
and the U.S. government. U.S. commercial revenue is growing 100% year over year right now.
Their consolidated revenue has accelerated from, I'm sharing the chart here, it's a little small
on my screen, but September 23, about two years ago, they were growing revenue at 17%,
It slowly accelerated to 63% at the end of last quarter.
Next year, beginning in Q1, they're going to have to comp 40% year-over-year revenue
growth.
They are now doing $4 billion in annual sales in a niche category, software analytics.
And sure, they are going to keep growing, but there's only so much revenue available
to software analytics providers and with a lot of competition in the space.
This is not a plug-and-play solution.
It is for large custom deployments only.
So any small or mid-sized business, we always use Ryan's company and our sponsor, Fiscal AI, as an example.
You're not going to be doing a $1 million consulting thing to plug Palantir into your systems.
You'd have to be a much, much bigger business to have that happen.
So that small and mid-sized enterprises, they're not part of this addressable market.
and look, can someone who knows this business better than me
tell me they're going to keep compounding revenue
and they're going to sound smarter than me?
Of course.
I mean, there's people that know this business
way, way better than I do.
But I will say that the AI bubble is not going to last forever.
67% revenue growth is not going to last forever.
A decel is going to come and it maybe comes in 2026.
And if it does, the stock is overvalued
regardless of whether that occurs like three years from now.
where if they keep growing revenue at 60% for the next five years,
like the stock is still overvalued.
So I don't think you're going to lose much money if that occurs or anything.
And third is the fact the company has the opposite of what I'm looking for in management,
which is an erratic CEO, frankly, a crazy CEO that I do not trust.
They are massive diluters of stock, 4.4% annual growth in shares outstanding since 2021.
This is really not a man I would trust with my capital, and I'm highly skeptical.
he has talked about burning the shorts which is red flag and as somebody could easily pattern
match to a scammy person no evidence has come out like look it's all smoke and mirrors i guess at
this point but as buffett liked to say he was able to identify who the scammy scammy fraudulent ceos
were pretty actively in prospectively given they all had similar characteristics now fourth is i
think this is a nice hedge for my portfolio in case of a market downturn you know we talk about
being value investors over here but my portfolio is coupon air pong yeah coupon airbnb and remitly
these are stocks that maybe they've already started to fall but during a market downturn
they're going to fall they're probably going to be a little higher beta and stuff some stuff i
have i think is idiosyncratic but i think a short with palantir is a nice way that's not going to
have the same sort of like okay here's a good way to put it when palantir stock has been ripping
this year most of my longs also do fairly well so it's not like my portfolio totally gets blown
out of proportion long short when that happens and it's not sized that much in general now in
a downturn i think palantir is probably going to fall 80 if not 90 and i think that's going to be
I just think it's going to be a good investment over the next five years.
And if it doesn't fall or crash 80% within a year,
then I think it's a great funding short for the next decade.
Okay, when I sell my business, I want the best tax and investment advice.
I want to help my kids, and I want to give back to the community.
Ooh, then it's the vacation of a lifetime.
I wonder if my head of office has a forever setting.
An IG Private Wealth Advisor creates the clarity you need with plans that harmonize your business, your family, and your dreams.
Get financial advice that puts you at the center.
Find your advisor at IGPrivateWealth.com.
Yeah, this is probably the craziest valuation I have ever seen.
At this large of a price, yeah.
Yeah. I've heard that during the dot-com bubble, there were some that were more extreme, but 113 times sales on a business that does have a, does do a lot in revenue. It's not like that just happens to be the case that, you know, it's not like they just started generating revenue and it's a hundred times sales.
it's a well-established business and we're talking about a massive like
eventually you saw this with shopify in like 2022 eventually it becomes just impossible to fulfill
that valuation and if you're the management team you're almost stuck in a place of you have no
options you don't know what to do the what is probably best honestly for your business is to
talk it down to talk down the stock because buying back is a waste of cash right now sorry that that's
a bad decision but everyone's rsus are going to be underwater that are if they're given some now
probably most likely you're going to have low employee morale i mean i think the best thing
you can do is kind of set expectations if you keep talking it up it's going to be when stocks drop
80, 90 percent. It's like detrimental to the business. Usually it like it really hurts morale and everything actually happening at the business. So I agree. I mean, it is larger for context than Salesforce and Adobe combined on its market cap. And it has six percent of the revenue of those two businesses combined. And those businesses have great margins. So I say great, but like they could they could probably generate more money, too.
it's it is an extreme valuation any way you slice it how much does it cost you to afford the short
like how much are the uh premiums i haven't added that up but it's got to be less than what you could
earn and it's not expensive that's a nice thing about these versus like on illiquid stuff it's
not that much and yeah really if you're going to hold it in cash yeah i don't i haven't added
frankly i haven't added up and i haven't noticed uh the fees seem pretty small so what is i guess
what i use it to buy uh i use it to buy remitly so you know it might have been better just holding
cash i mean look think about it if on an absolute basis you can you can short it and then hold it
in the treasury etf or something like that you can earn four percent short-term treasury etf
because you get the cash from shorting.
What's the rationale for doing this
as opposed to put options?
Just don't want to deal with the timing?
Cleaner, timing,
stock could easily be flat next year or up.
Yeah.
And the good thing is that I think generally,
if Palantir, let's say, doubles
and the bubble goes into overdrive next year,
I think my portfolio would be okay
and a lot of stuff I'm long
will do just fine plus i have income coming into the portfolio so there's really many many layers
to not get totally blown up especially because i didn't make this 20 of my portfolio cost i think
it's one percent is this your largest short uh let's just check quick here i think it's
them, Tesla, and Apple.
It might take the Apple off, honestly.
I feel like it's going to be a good funding
short, but I also feel
like there's better opportunities out there.
Actually, Tesla's
number one.
They're about the same size.
Still very, very small
positions. You want to hear some other companies
that they're larger than? I'll close things out here
very, very quick. Palantir's
a larger market cap than ASML,
Bank of America,
AbbVie, Netflix, Costco, LVMH, Alibaba, Home Depot, Procter & Gamble, General Electric,
Cisco, Coca-Cola, Wells Fargo, Chevron, UnitedHealth, and Toyota.
Yeah, that's extreme.
All right, wrapping it up, the six stocks we covered today were Airbnb, Sprouts Farmers
Market, Adobe, MercadoLibre, Amazon, and a short on Palantir.
we will time stamp this revisit in december late december 2026 see how we did with that
brett you want to take us out i sure can let's do the disclosure and get out of here we are not
financial advisors and we say on this show is not formal advice or recommendation ryan i or any
podcast guests may hold securities discussed in this podcast may have held them in the past
and may buy sell or hold them in the future thank you everyone for tuning in and we'll see you next
time.
