Chit Chat Stocks - $NVDA Is King Again; A Credit Card Mega Merger; Underrated Network Effects; A Rivian Bankruptcy?
Episode Date: February 25, 2024The Investing Power Hour is live-streamed every Thursday on the Chit Chat Stocks YouTube channel. This week we discussed: - $NVDA crushing earnings again: Is this the top? - Capital One wants to b...uy Discover Financial - What are the best and underrated network effect companies? - Will Rivian file for bankruptcy? ***************************************************** Subscribe to our YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@ChitChatStocks Follow us on Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/chitchatstocks Follow us on Substack: https://chitchatstocks.substack.com/ ********************************************************************* Public.com just launched options trading, and they’re doing something no other brokerage has done before: sharing 50% of their options revenue directly with you. That means instead of paying to place options trades, you get something back on every single trade. -Earn $0.18 rebate per contract traded -No commission fees -No per-contract fees By sharing 50% of their options revenue, Public has created a more transparent options trading experience. You’ll know exactly how much they make from each trade because they literally give you half of it. Activate options trading at Public.com/chitchatstocks by March 31 to lock in your lifetime rebate. Options are not suitable for all investors and carry significant risk. Certain complex options strategies carry additional risk. Options can be risky and are not suitable for all investors. See the Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options to learn more. For each options transaction, Public Investing shares 50% of their order flow revenue as a rebate to help reduce your trading costs. This rebate will be displayed as a negative number in the “Additional Fees” column of your Trade Confirmation Statement and will be immediately reflected in the total dollars paid or received for the transaction. Order flow rebates are only issued for options trades and not for transactions involving other assets, including equities. For more information, refer to the Fee Schedule. All investing involves the risk of loss, including loss of principal. Brokerage services for US-listed, registered securities, options and bonds in a self-directed account are offered by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA & SIPC. See public.com/#disclosures-main for more information. ********************************************************************* FinChat.io is The Complete Stock Research Platform for fundamental investors. With its beautiful design and institutional-quality data, FinChat is incredibly powerful and easy to use. Use our LINK and get 25% off any premium plan: https://finchat.io/chitchat/?lmref=J3bklw ********************************************************************* Disclosure: Chit Chat Stocks hosts and guests are not financial advisors, and nothing they say on this show is formal advice or a recommendation. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to Chit Chat Stocks. On this show, hosts Ryan Henderson and Brett Schaefer analyze
businesses and riff on the world of investing. As a quick reminder, Chit Chat Stocks is a
CCM Media Group podcast. Anything discussed on Chit Chat Stocks by Ryan, Brett, or any
other podcast guest is not formal advice or recommendation. Now, please enjoy this episode.
Welcome in to Chit Chat Stocks. My name is Brett Schaefer, and as always,
joined by my good friend, Ryan Henderson. We are live on YouTube for the Investing Power Hour,
number 99. So next week, we've got to do something special to commemorate number 100.
But Ryan, we're going to get started today.
And it has been a fun week.
I think my first question for you, besides welcome to the show, as always,
NVIDIA approaching a market cap of $2 trillion.
Are you calling the top?
Is NVIDIA finally overvalued?
Yes, and I will give you a very definitive answer
after I quickly talk about our friends at Public.
You might know public.com
as the all-in-one investing platform.
Now they've launched options trading
and with it, they're doing something
no brokerage has ever done before.
Public is sharing 50% of their options trading revenue
directly with you, the customer.
So whenever you trade options on Public,
you get something back.
And of course, there are no commissions
or per contract fees either.
By sharing 50% of their options revenue,
you'll know exactly how much they take
from your options trade
because public is literally giving you half of it.
In other words, it's a more transparent approach
to options with no fees
and you get something back on every single trade.
So go to public.com and activate options trading
by March 31st to lock in your lifetime rebate.
This is paid for by public investing.
You must activate options account
by March 31st for revenue share.
Options are not suitable for all investors
and carry significant risk.
Full disclosures are in the podcast description,
US members only.
Is NVIDIA overvalued?
Wait, one tease before.
I see we are live on YouTube.
This will be fixed for the people listening after or watching on YouTube after.
But for some reason, the new streaming software we are using to record everything just puts the title as the previous episode, which I'm not exactly sure.
I think I'll try to change that midstream for anyone.
This is Investing Power Hour number 99.
You are not watching a replay.
But Ryan, continue as I try to change that and then tweet out the links to everything.
i have absolutely no idea whether nvidia is overvalued my gut says yes but my gut said that
a trillion dollars in market cap ago so what you know what does that matter the the thing i find
interesting is like this is probably the biggest business i don't care about the not that not that
I don't care, but I don't think I have much of an advantage in terms of informationally.
I don't think I know the business very well.
I don't know the industry that well.
And so it's one where it could be worth $10 trillion, and I still don't understand necessarily whether or not it has some major lasting competitive advantage where it's totally impregnable.
impregnable. It can't be stopped. And there's no competitor that could get to what they've done.
I really don't know it well enough. So yeah, I think my gut reaction, any time a stock,
what, five Xs in a matter of a year, is it has to be overvalued. But
so far, I've been wrong all along the way. I haven't been shorting it or anything like that.
But this report was pretty remarkable. I'll pull up a graphic. I'll let you talk for a second here,
but i want to pull up a graphic that i made i'm getting good with canva so i'm i'm really proud
of these little graphics and i'll show it here in a second but what do you think of the quarter
well my psychological long is doing quite well no kidding kidding but pretty impressive stuff
and it's hard like i've had i guess some takes like everyone has or a lot of people have had
that nvidia is possibly over earning given the margin expansion they've had but it's impossible
to tell how much longer they can ride this boom i don't think anyone has any good predictions here
the uncertainty is just huge and it has turned into as tesla was with obviously a little maybe
not as good fundamentals and during that time period uh into a bit of a trading sardine where
the popularity among individual investors is enormous. The popularity among options trading
is enormous. And that is going to lead to more volatility, almost assuredly. But
is NVIDIA going to continue growing these earnings as Ryan was showing? I don't think
there's any good reason just because we don't know how big this current AI boom is going to be.
And whether they have the moat that can retain the market share they have with these AI services versus the competitors like Intel, AMD, perhaps Sam Altman's venture, stuff like that.
There's so many variables out there that I think anyone that tells you, hey, you know, it's time to get long NVIDIA or it's time to get short NVIDIA at this price.
I think you're kind of flipping a coin.
Yeah, 100%. The growth rate is staggering. And obviously, the growth rate has to slow down. But I think you raise a good point, which is like, maybe we were totally wrong.
My prediction was that we were in an AI bubble or hype cycle, and maybe there were some long-term implications for it, but if this proves not to be a bubble and that every company is spending on these AI models because they really increase the value of their service, then NVIDIA is probably early innings here.
but they grew revenue 265% year over year, $22 billion, I think, in revenue for the quarter.
It's pretty staggering. You can just see the massive acceleration over the last year.
Like I said, my gut tells me this is not going to be an outperforming stock over the coming years.
it is bigger than amazon officially it is bigger than the entire chinese stock market combined
uh it's probably bigger than a lot of things but art crimes though the gdp comparisons
let's go guys not not the same i would say if we're going to capitalize gdp numbers maybe
but those comparisons are always flawed but i thought it was interesting the chinese stock
market totally bonded bonded out here's a good question what performs better i think it's either
the hong kong or the shanghai index either or what performs better over the next decade nvidia
or one of those indices that's interesting i'm not particularly optimistic about either the
The – what's also interesting is that NVIDIA, I believe, had a huge slowdown in their China revenue because there was government restrictions from the US around them selling that much there.
So they're kind of at odds with one another right now.
the maybe the chinese the the hong kong stock exchange or the stocks traded on it the stock
market in general will be slow because they don't have as much access to nvidia's chips so they
can't innovate as fast or something i don't know the well i would probably pick i'd probably pick
the china's frankly i'd pick the chinese stock market i think just purely betting on like if
we just ignore the regime uh or the government they're purely like mean reversion which i've
been wrong on for the longest time but everyone seems to be bullish on chinese equities it seems
like yeah and yet the prices still keep going down yeah i agree with you i like neither
it's an interesting question though one more though on the old nvidia is does this company
at some point actually let me change it from just a comparison to apple
does nvidia at any day in 2024 have the largest market cap of any company in the world is
currently number three only two ahead apple and microsoft with about a trillion dollars i believe
give or take i think it's possible it's certainly possible that would be quite insane
and i want to take a yeah i want to take a second to give a shout out to beth kindig
who i don't know if she could have foreseen this ai
bubble whatever you want to call it coming but in 2021 she wrote that in five years nvidia will have
a bigger market cap than apple and everyone called her absolutely crazy there's a chance
there is a chance that that looks right because she's got till what 2026 to make that happen
i think if it does happen it will be helped by apple's stock price coming down actually
as opposed to just nvidia soaring yeah it's apple stock has struggled a little bit this year that
is correct i think i read something on that i don't follow it too closely all right we got
some questions people are joining in for anyone that is a first-time listener or is unaware we
do these live on thursdays at about 12 30 p.m eastern time so if you want to join have any
questions for us. We can talk anything in the investing world. We might say we don't know
anything about your question, but you can ask away and maybe get us to do a certain topic.
But we have some questions in here. Thank you for everyone joining. Do you guys have any takes
on Blackstone, KKR, private equity companies? I think my only take on that is that higher
interest rates for longer don't know whether that's going to happen but i'd say under that
scenario i think these companies struggle more than people are expecting uh other than that
what's the rationale there well it's just the higher cost yeah yeah exactly to perform these
deals they were in regardless of how well they executed they were in an ideal interest rate
environment over the last say post gfc do i think that changes their funding inflows no and that's
what's going to matter at the end of the day as long as they don't act incredibly stupid
um i remember we talked about kkr once and they had some decent exposure to china
with something like bite dance stuff like that which i would be a little bit concerned about
but on the whole that's the only thing that i'd factor in i don't i don't like those type of
companies where i invest in asset managers just not my cup of tea right it's like gatherers more
so than anything else yeah yeah it's yeah it's i've been blown away by their ability to collect
assets over the last year or not over the last year certainly over the last year but over the
last decade i mean they are perhaps it's because they don't have to mark their book down as much
So a lot of attracting capital is selling past performance. So if you don't have to mark it down, you can potentially say like, oh, well, we've actually performed better than the index right now in these tough times. So here's another reason for you to add capital.
So I do think – and I'm not totally sure how all these deals work out, but I think they could probably shift more to – because there's usually a lot of levered buyouts here.
And I assume they could kind of reduce the leverage that they use in some of these buyouts and shift it more towards funding from investors would be my guess with interest rates rising.
But yeah, no doubt the interest rates will probably hurt them a little bit or at least slow them down.
I think these businesses will just continue to collect capital and collect fees.
The one thing I've learned probably over the last, I don't know, five years, really probably last three years since we started trying to manage money on our own.
these endowments have unlimited capital to give to allocators like a kkr and like a blackstone
so it wouldn't be surprised me it would not surprise me if they continue to grow
i agree okay other questions will you be following the booking report this afternoon yes
i'm interested in that in relation um i saw there's a great write-up update from our friend
at the tsoh investing research service on airbnb and i think if you follow booking you should be
looking at airbnb if you follow airbnb which we do we don't own it um but it's one of my watch
lists you need to be following booking as well because there are i wouldn't probably a duopoly
at this point don't want to put too much hate on nvidia but or excuse me expedia that was a funny
that was a that was a funny slip that i don't think nvidia is getting into to otas other question
that i think is more interesting so i love this honest comment from mark says hey chaps loving
the show as ever thank you uh bad week for teledoc has my position down 89 i have a buy and hold
forever strategy but this is really testing it sensible decision is to cut losses right
okay interesting question and i follow the stock price and the earnings headlines i think it's a
fun one to look at kind of the covid boom stocks zoom roku teledoc all those block slash square
and this is an interesting one i i you know i appreciate the comment because
not any investor out there like there's not a single investor that's not going to have a big
dog every once in a while buffett invested in ibm for example that was a you know not the end of the
world of a mistake but you know a bad mistake even the best out there are going to have bad
investments and i think this commenter is following the david gardner style and it says hey look should
i cut my losses and you know just go for something else with that sort of style now david gardner
takes it to the extreme it says i'm never going to sell stuff but i think in reality
when you're an individual investor it probably works to just take the the tax write-off
if you're not interested in the company anymore just kind of look at those each year
i forget what the exact number is you get every year for the the uh offsets but i'm explaining
this poorly, but in a vacuum, it shouldn't really matter because if you have a position
that you have your basket of portfolio and you kind of let them ride, some will turn
into huge positions if they do quite well, but the losers will basically become irrelevant
over time and it's really no different from selling.
But with especially people in the United States, you can get that tax write-off.
So if you have those, I'd recommend doing that if you don't want to own it anymore.
But if you're going to really run the David Gardner strategy, maybe psychologically, kind
that never sells stuff could fit because when you go through that the losses are going to be there
basically either way it doesn't truly matter that much at this point if and if teledoc goes down
another 50 right as long as the biggest mistake we've done it before is averaging we still do it
so much is to average down so much into into a big loser whose uh business is not doing well
Yeah, I don't really have a take on Teladoc just because I haven't followed it closely
at all.
My only advice would be, as much as you can, try to ignore your returns to date.
Don't worry about your cost basis.
Just worry about Teladoc as an opportunity against the rest of the stocks in your portfolio
or the rest of the stocks in your kind of wheelhouse
and just say, do I want to invest in Teladoc today
versus the rest of the investments I like?
If it's not screaming at you when it's down 90%,
my gut would say find something else
and probably not average down here.
But yeah, like I said, don't follow it very closely.
And Tyler mentions here,
Gardner sizes appropriately for a never-sell strategy.
Yeah, if you're going to do that,
you got you're gonna have home runs in 10 years hopefully that are not four run home runs but
potentially 50 run home runs uh if things really work out but you're also gonna people aren't
gonna talk about the ones that are big misses right strikeouts where they could go to zero so
you know it definitely size appropriately not everyone's gonna end up like an nvidia
in fact most of them will not so definitely i think probably start small with positions like
that yep i agree all right but we got some other comments a little more sorry do you want to talk
a little more about booking or no the earnings are out that's a sour a little bit yeah i'd
recommend reading listening to ryan's uh show that he did or well we did together but he was
the one that led that episode. I'd say let's wait for the earnings to come out before we
give a full discussion, but I'm definitely looking forward to that one today. I'm looking
forward to Carvanha's good old psychological short. I'm sorry, I won't have that joke too
many times. It's a little bit of an inside joke for the FinTwit crowd, but I'm very interested
in reading that one because that one has been an enigma and just a wild company that is
extremely aggressive. We have some other comments I might want to hit later,
But the one topic I wanted to discuss this week, and you have some good notes on this,
so I'll let you start out, is the big news.
I think it was, was it Monday or Sunday, came across the line as Capital One merging with
Discover Financial, going to be a huge merger for over $35 billion.
But Ryan, I'll let you lead into it.
What are the details here?
What are your thoughts?
Yeah, I can't remember which day it was announced.
But I just kind of went through my notes on Discover because we recently visited them as a potential investment.
We did a not-so-deep dive, I want to say, about five or six months ago maybe.
But yeah, Capital One is agreeing – they have agreed to buy Discover Financial Services for more than $35 billion.
I believe this is an all-stock deal.
I actually did not look specifically enough at the terms.
But I just want to go through each of these businesses.
Maybe they're not that well-followed.
And kind of think about some of the synergies and potential implications here.
So what does Capital One do?
Capital One is the ninth largest bank in the country.
And from what I understand, they're more of a traditional bank and they have the physical branches.
And then they're just a major credit card issuer.
So they collect deposits primarily from consumers.
They lend out mostly through credit card – standard credit card programs where for anyone that doesn't know,
it's just you're earning on carried balances. So as the bank, you're collecting interest on
carried balances, but for the most part, you're not really going to be, hopefully most of your
credit card holders are not often having carried balances because then these can be really
rewarding programs, but they have to be managed properly because it can get out of hand if you
don't have the right parameters around it. So anyway, that's Capital One, credit card issuer,
ninth largest bank in the country discover financial is a bit different they have two
separate but complementary segments to their business one is digital banking and the second
is payment services so i'll go through each of these real quick these are from my notes from
the previous show it says discover is a digital only bank with 115 billion dollars in total
deposits that might have gone up since we last looked at it or gone down it says the deposits
come primarily 65% in the form of consumer deposits. And they also have like brokered
and borrowings. And then they take those deposits and lend them out at higher rates,
pocket the difference. The way Discover does that, that's what typical banks do, right?
That's the banking model. Discover does that primarily through credit cards, also like Capital
One. Credit cards account for 80% of Discover's loan volume. And then the second part here,
When we did the show, we talked about Discover Financial. We didn't really give that much value or I didn't give that much time to the payments network side of things. So beyond banking, Discover also operates its own payments network, similar to that of Visa, MasterCard, American Express. I think that's really the only other three. This means they process and settle transactions made across their various networks.
The way you can think about a network, because I've been hung up on this probably for most of my investing life, is they help banks communicate with one another.
So you're being kind of the arbiter or the middleman between a consumer bank and a merchant bank because there are millions of banks around the globe and you have to process and settle each transaction from the consumer to the merchant and it's really hard for banks to do that on their own.
So you have to go through a network. There's basically been four networks that have been developed over time, Visa, MasterCard, American Express, and then Discover.
So, in total, Discover has about the same coverage as Visa and MasterCard in the US in terms of not process transactions, but total locations. It's pretty good coverage in the United States. However, internationally, they're nowhere near it. So, it's the fourth largest payments network.
Why would Capital One want to buy Discover? I know I'm going long here, so I'll try to make this quick. Here's a snippet from the Wall Street Journal. It says, buying Discover would allow it to process card transactions on a payment network that isn't controlled by Visa or MasterCard. That could give it a new revenue stream and result in cost savings.
They could also potentially have some synergies with the credit card programs.
They could start to rebrand some of the cards.
But they said they're going to keep most of the Discover branded cards, Discover.
So I don't think that much will change, but it could potentially take some of the money that they're constantly paying Visa and MasterCard away and make it their own revenue line and juice it as well.
because they have so many credit cards of their own.
So they're taking this small payments network from Discover
and amplifying it because they have all these merchant relations
or these banking relations,
and they could potentially expand the coverage as well
to all of Capital One's partners.
The buyout was a 27% premium to the closing price.
So congrats to Discover shareholders.
I should also mention that there was some executive turmoil at Discover,
So it might have been, I don't want to say like a bailout, but they might have been eager to sell.
Discover might have been looking for a buyer.
We did get a comment though that said Buffett is a big Capital One investor.
There's a secret position that he's been investing in.
What are the odds that Buffett had anything to do with this?
What are your thoughts?
Possibly, but I don't.
I wouldn't.
Is that really the interesting question, though?
Because it's just kind of, yeah, maybe.
But, yeah.
He probably got the call.
I'm sure if he's a large enough shareholder of this company.
Yeah.
I'd be very surprised if the secret position was Discover
because you can't – he'd be tampering with –
that would be a bad thing.
Who do you think wins here?
Who do you think loses?
Do you think this has any bearings on Visa and MasterCard?
Well, if I remember looking at Capital One in their investor presentation, because I
knew we were covering this, I read the merger presentation.
It seems like if everything falls away from Visa and MasterCard and goes onto the Discover
network and they essentially build a second American Express without different brands,
but essentially build an American Express with a vertically integrated network.
It would be a decent hit in the United States,
but for Visa and MasterCard internationally,
I don't really think it's much to sniff at.
These are companies that we're interested in.
We've talked about covering Capital One,
and maybe that's a next one to cover for a stock report going forward.
I can maybe do that after we do Elf Beauty,
which we're recording tomorrow, coming out next week.
we've covered discover covered all the other payments companies my big takeaway is that
when reading all this is that american express visa and mastercard had ideal positions in
competitively just within the marketplace throughout the entire call they were talking
about look it's almost impossible today to build a new payments network at least in the united
states maybe it could be possible in a smaller market and you have to go to all these merchants
it takes years and years and years discover has been the fourth player they basically have big
acceptance but they haven't made much money on it because they haven't gotten to the scale and
there's capital one is essentially saying we're going to merge with this company and spend what
we're going to spend 35 billion dollars yeah they're getting this asset that's already been
built. But in order to properly compete with American Express, Visa, and MasterCard, and then
you'd also say someone like Chase with the big credit card business that they have,
we're going to need to spend a ton of money. We probably aren't going to win because Visa and
MasterCard, yeah, this could be a moat test, but how much confidence do you have in them
really seeing any market share losses. I think it also, again, shows to me that American Express
has been ahead of the game and people have underrated that in recent years because
essentially they're saying American Express is in the ideal position and now we need to
merge these two companies to hopefully get there over time. But the concern for me is that
these brands are not good
they're fine
Capital Ones is okay, Discover's is not good
the stock's still done well
despite that but
maybe
at 5, 7, 6, 7 times
earnings this works but
well
I would say at the worst case
they may have gotten Discover
at sort of a decent bargain
they
because I remember looking at Discover thinking
they're potentially under earning here if they got back to kind of expanded net interest margins
and they were in a good spot they'd be okay i i don't think it's a bad purchase necessarily
i don't know if i buy all the synergies like i think that like you said they're trying to
build a second american express but they don't necessarily have the american express brand at
least in the eyes of consumers i'd be surprised that this really made a dent in any of the
competitors businesses especially visa and mastercard at this point it's just not big enough
to affect them really the transaction volume i'd be very surprised if visa or mastercard sold off
on this i think that's probably a wonderful opportunity i mean yeah well they have pretty
extreme valuations anyways i don't think so i remember looking i don't think they did yeah well
everything's up today but no nothing happened i saw some people giving a hot take that like
mastercard and visa could be affected if they take all the money off of the the networks and
i don't okay here's a few things one people usually have multiple credit cards i'm guessing
two or three perhaps more if you try to be really efficient with it or inefficient and you're bad
with it but you know people try to get the points the sign-on bonuses stuff like that
and even though discover is accepted everywhere in the united states similar to american express
people are always going to want to have a visa or mastercard option in their wallet because they
they are confident that that's accepted at a hundred percent of places but there's a lack
of confidence from the other two and i don't like okay if capital one goes off a visa and
mastercard and goes to discover's network i think now i'm curious if you disagree with me here
that hurts the capital one brand okay if you're a consumer looking if you're a consumer looking
to get a capital one card yeah potentially just lower acceptance internationally that's kind of
tarnishes it a bit but maybe they can work to revamp that first or help expand its coverage
but it's perception it's still under the capital one brand though
do you but if you have like okay we have our we have our discover card from capital one
if i'm a customer maybe it's misguided but i think everyone thinks like this
i'm saying okay i have my just capital one card it's on discover i might need to have a visa card
in my wallet too as a backup yeah potentially maybe maybe that's not a big deal maybe you
could just get rid of you could just call the discover network nothing and you could just have
it like an american express card where all you see is capital one and yeah you know when you
look at an american express card i believe it doesn't say anything about the network that it's
on it just says american express you could just have capital one be similar where they don't even
have to think about the other payments network. Now, there are some questions here about whether
or not the merger would go through. This to me really does not make any sense. Why would
we have to block this? Why is it in the consumer's advantage to block this?
First of all, there's a million online banks to choose from, not a million, but there's a lot of
banks you can choose from there's a ton of credit card providers you can choose from
so who are you protecting by capital one consolidating this you're protecting visa
and mastercard basically which there is consistently litigation regulation whatever
trying to get passed to prevent visa and mastercard from continuing to expand their take rate
why would you want to protect them i i think well i think this should get passed i don't
I don't know if it will, but I don't see how it hurts consumers.
I think they could make an argument that it creates a competitive advantage versus bank issuers.
But in reality, I don't think that's the case because there are so many bank issuers of credit cards out there.
You have the large ones, you have your local ones, you have the partners with the travel companies.
they all basically use Visa or MasterCard
unless you're American Express
and you use yourself
yeah it doesn't seem like
there's any anti-competitive
stuff going on here but
it is vertical integration
technically
so maybe there
would be concerns if Visa bought
Capital One
yeah that would be a concern
that's an obvious one but
i think there's a certain senator in the united states i know we have a lot of international
listeners too that just tweets about every merger like it's evil so i i don't think we should take
that seriously because she just seems to be yelling an old i guess it's not the old man
yelling at cloud old lady yelling at cloud type deal yeah it seems unlikely that it would get
blocked if anything this is probably better because maybe it'll force mastercard and visa
to kind of be careful about increasing that take rate but seems unlikely so anyways yeah let's uh
yeah for any listeners we were debating uh internally which just basically means the two
of us whether we should do an episode on capital one in the merger and we're kind of like maybe
people listen if you really want to listen to one on that where we kind of do a full hour long
analysis on the company and the merge the merger instead of kind of these off the cuff things
let us know and we'll do one but right now it's it's on the table and you can reach out to us
chit chat money podcast at gmail.com or reach out to us on twitter we are pretty responsive yeah
yeah yep so and we do get a lot of emails so appreciate everyone that does that i know tyler
email this a couple times so uh always appreciate getting that email another question here did you
see match groups press release uh this was kind of hilarious yeah well hey we're if we're talking
about ai demand this could either get you bullish on ai or nvidia or bearish because you could say
well are these companies going to be doing this in five years explain what they did and kind of
the unique it was not really funny it's funny because people make fun of them but yeah so
take us take us through it yeah so match group just announced this new press release and if
you click into it it basically says this did not need to be a press release it basically says they
acquired a thousand chat gpt enterprise accounts they they're they're paying for a new service
that's that was the press release essentially uh the kind of ironic thing is first of all
those usually don't require a press release maybe well it was written by chat gpt ryan
so maybe you get it funny i guess uh maybe it was required like maybe it was a term in the
partnership if you want to call it a partnership maybe they just said like hey we'll give you a
discount if you just drop a press release and whatever in that case maybe it's the right thing
to do however match group also bragged on their last conference call about launching dark mode
which it's starting to feel like they're just like announcing they think there's more product
innovation than what's really going on uh i love yeah i love those type of companies that will
press release everything the wicks wicks was like serial press releasers oh yeah they're the kings
of that stocks actually done well though recently earnings are strong earnings are strong uh 140
no big deal stock all right yeah wicks 140 really that is a good report i actually read it i read it
i get their emails solid report accelerating growth it's a great core business i think
you've got it's pretty sticky because as long as your business itself is not
as long as you want to keep your website up it's kind of a pain to switch
so as long as websites on the internet continue to grow i think their influence and their market
share among content management systems will also grow so okay it's really just chipping away at
wordpress yeah they got a good tailwind tough thing is though management not too good at managing
capital and they are operating in a country that is at war so it's also a tough one uh add some
risks there yeah back on match group clearly people are making fun of this release as they
should do you think it's a legitimate red flag i kind of think it's it's fine they're gonna do
these things probably what you gotta expect not a thesis changer though unless it shows up in the
op-ex and they say well we actually had to spend 50 million dollars more for these innovative ai
licenses yeah then that's really concerning the i don't think it's a red flag i don't think it's a
real red flag it's frustrating that they seem to have their eye off the ball a bit like i don't
mind gary swidler i think he does a pretty good job as cfo but i just i don't know i worry about
the rest of the team we'll see we'll see well tinder ceo the tinder ceo is important she just
got the position i would love for them to give her more air time talk about that see what they're
doing there yeah there is a world in which five years from now we look back at this and i think
this is you could say like holy smokes you were getting match group at 10 times cash flow that's
insane because maybe tinder re-accelerates there's more adoption to be had abroad there's it's not
nearly as close to saturation as people thought hinge grows even faster it's got a higher value
user base people are willing to pay more and then all of a sudden you've got like these two pillars
driving this kind of wonderful business and it's a great network effect but i could also see tinder
potentially going the way of match.com which that seems to be the bear case right now is that is
this slowly turning into a legacy app i really hope not but i don't know i you can kind of see
this is one where i can clearly make the case either way
yeah well i own it for better or worse we'll see we're gonna ride uh i think i'm gonna ride
through it for the next year or so at least uh but obviously update every quarter i've grabbed
the run we're over halfway through so why don't you pull up a nice chart and talk about our good
friends your humble employer finchat.io i'm gonna ask you to pull up the chart because i don't if
okay for anyone that knows i you maybe hear this on occasion but i sometimes have to click around
to move tabs around and then it kind of sounds annoying so i don't want to do that but if brett's
going to pull up a chart. That would be great so that we could see the FinChat dashboard,
see what the platform is like. FinChat is the complete fundamental research terminal
for investors. You get really intuitive and good looking charts. So if you're someone that likes
to share charts, I really think the platform is awesome because they have like here, Brett is
pulling something up right now and he can pick paying users for Match Group and it's just
really seamless. They do have segments and KPIs, so company-specific data like users,
like AWS revenue, like how many cigarettes did Altria sell last quarter and the last 12 quarters.
It's a very specific granular data that really no other platform has, and they've got it on over
1,500 stocks. And if you want KPI data for a specific business, just give me a shout and I
will pass it along to the data team. And they usually get those up pretty quick. But yeah,
very easy, wonderful platform, very intuitive. And I think it looks pretty sleek. Some invest
kind of investment management platforms like anywhere that you're doing your research,
that can be intimidating, a bit of an intimidating interface. I think it's a little easier.
So if you want to check it out, FinChat.io, if you're interested in any paid plans, FinChat.io slash chitchat will get you 25% off.
That's FinChat.io slash chitchat.
I'll leave it there.
Actually, I have a question for you.
How have you been enjoying the platform?
It's good.
It's good.
Helpful.
A lot of stuff on the old Twitter X machine.
It's helpful for research.
gonna have for sharing quite a bit gonna have quite a few in the elf beauty episode that we're
recording tomorrow stocks up 600 in two years it's quite the comeback story for them after being
after going nowhere it was a dog about five yeah interesting because they're just selling cheap
cosmetics to gen z and millennial women but they they got tiktok right so
it worked.
That seems to be a huge part of the business.
That seems to be the takeaway that I have,
but do you want to talk Rivian?
Yeah.
What happened to Ryan?
This could be,
yeah,
this could be ugly.
I think I was talking with Travis.
Can I ever say his last name?
Right.
I think it's how you say that.
Molly fool analyst been on the show before does asymmetric investing.
Nice little YouTube channel over there.
And he was worried. I was talking to him about it because I didn't really follow the company that well, but they were already taking, you know, they're at just over 10,000 in production per quarter, and they're already taking some of their initial truck production off the line and going for the SUV for their second product.
and I was a little concerned about that.
It turns out this might have been a real concern.
I should say I've never had a position either way in Rivian,
but the stock is collapsing today.
It's down 30%.
Deliveries are stagnating.
We see Q2 2023, 12.6 thousand.
Q3, 15.5.
Q4, 13.9, or basically 14,000 deliveries.
And they're projecting minimal growth
to just 57,000 for all of 2024. Gross profit per unit is going in the wrong direction. And we're
seeing gross margin at a time when they should be inflecting really high to break even as they
ran production. It went from negative 36% in Q3 2023 to negative 46%. Last quarter, they are on
a 1.5 billion dollar quarterly free cash flow burn and they only have about nine billion dollars
in cash left so maybe one to two years at this current state things look pretty bad stocks
definitely down i think the market cap is about 10 billion dollars right now so technically
that enterprise value is quite low if but no that's not how you should value this company
my question bankruptcy watch yeah next three years does rivian
automotive or this current corporate structure file for bankruptcy do they have any debt right
now uh i can check real quick it's got to be net cash right with all the money they raised i would
assume they have a net cash position the i think bankruptcy is certainly potential here i mean it
just goes to show how hard and rivian is one of the more successful recent automotive businesses
to have been launched at least relative to some of the other uh
spacks if we want to call them that what was the big one uh to answer your question 4.4 billion
in long-term debt, so
what, $5 billion
net cash, give or take?
Yeah, wow.
I think bankruptcy
is potential. It just goes to
show how hard it is to scale an automotive business.
Props to Tesla
in this regard.
Yeah.
They did it a little
as I'd argue.
A little
not scammy.
Not dangerous.
They took bigger risks.
I think a lot of risk in a lot of ways. Let's say that. That's probably a good way to put it.
And I really think they were probably one of the biggest beneficiaries of low rates.
And they had – because you look at them at this point and they're fine.
They have gotten to a point where their production is scaled enough that they can survive for a while.
But you go back to 2018, 2019, if they weren't able to raise so much money, which maybe that's more good – that's like props to Elon on his ability to tell a good story.
I don't think they'd be where they are today, not even close.
Here's the question though.
Is this Rivian report – is it positive for Tesla or negative?
because we're clearly seeing
deterioration in demand in the EV market.
It's been a big trend over the last few quarters.
However, we might see it crowding out.
It's probably bittersweet for them
because they're definitely facing the same issues at the moment,
but the question is, is the long-term growth there?
I'm not sure.
i'd say assuming that like rivian this quarter specifically it's maybe a bit of a red flag but
because tesla's struggle and demand coincided with this struggle and demand so it's like
pretty much a sign across the board but if rivian goes bankrupt it's i mean it's
advantage tesla for them yeah yeah i mean but in a vacuum that's good for them but yeah
the mac it's a talent on them i think the the entire sector operating environment right now
yeah well you know what i kind of come back to with tesla and maybe it's just the fact
that i live in washington and they're like extremely common here because of all the tech
employees it feels like there is less appeal the more popular they become for me like
is there any chance that's happening
right now you know
there's so many Teslas on the road that there
isn't that much attraction to getting
a new one now if they could just be the low cost
provider the low
price I think they're probably
going to win no matter what but
I think it's kind of
I've lost my love for the brand
potentially
yeah no they're the true AI company Ryan
don't you understand Optimus
is coming I think the Cybertruck
give a little time but i'm increasing conviction on that given the reports from users i don't know
why i call everyone users these days but it seems like because it's yeah it's kind of it's yeah the
drivers it seems like that product's kind of a bust um and it's not actually workable like you
got this yeah stainless steel rusting who could have guessed i don't know any engineer that's
taking sophomore year classes um this reminds me though or brings up venom maybe a month
i don't know how maybe time's going slowly vision pro what do you think bust or no i'm leaning
towards way flat i think it's i think it's almost huge now huge yeah i think it's i agree with you
i don't know what is going on in silicon valley that they think people want this
it isn't there no one wants this meta apple whoever else has some vr goggles it's time
like i've never had even an inkling to want or to go to a store and buy one of these
yeah haven't even thought about it what's apple's user base billion if they gave it to me for free
i don't know if i'd use it exactly i think it's a good why am i going to go to the store and spend
three thousand dollars to get it yeah let's say does apple have a billion users maybe
what would you say there's 10 million kind of diehards out there that's probably a good estimate
a lot of bros on the west coast could be more yeah maybe let's say conservative 10 million
there was what probably inventory for 500 000 units i think on opening you know kind of
as we go through this year so you even have those fanboys they're all not all a lot of them are
returning it so these are the core fans like i think as someone who's these are the people that
show up to the events yeah like the smartphone was so good because it's so useful it basically
nowadays you have to have it to operate in society plane tickets paying for things finding uh dates
listening to music even in the early days you have to have a smartphone you don't have to have
these so they it's like i don't know i think it wasn't yeah i totally agree the and we talked
about like paying for plane tickets basically needing the iphone today you didn't need it but
it was still really useful in the early days to have all the different functionality that you're
using elsewhere consolidated into one place right the phone the texting the emails the which steve
ballmer said no one will ever use because you can't send an email from an iphone it's kind of
hilarious entertainment there was entertainment gaming was very popular in the early days it was
basically you know they could tack on a nintendo ds to something that's also usable it i thought
was really kind of uh the adoption was clear from the early days as opposed to i don't see the use
case here when they say that you're getting major headaches your neck hurts and that your eyes are
like you just stared at a screen for eight hours after 15 minutes i don't i you know it's classic
it's been the last 30 years of just wait next gen next generation they'll fix these issues i don't
know if they're fixable guys and if it takes a trillion dollars in r&d and capex well then
great as a consumer that's wonderful but the stock you know stock returns are going to be poor
yeah and this is nothing against i like mark zuckerberg i've had some negative takes over
the years and maybe this is the all-time high speaking but i think first of all that that new
meme of him it's quite hilarious but i think he's done a pretty good job guiding that company
i think this is a misguided bet but he's done such a good job with a family of apps that
yeah i kind of shrugged my shoulders and it seems like he's for them it's worth the bet
for apple i don't see why it's worth the bet never bet against meta is we have a comment here
or never bet against zuck long meta that could be true but i would you should remember
what was that crypto coin they were trying to pump in like 2018
oh it's not lima it's not that's the city in peru it's it was something like that it started with
an l you can't remember it i mean i bet it i bet against them on that and it was a collection of
companies right no no well ryan we're forgetting 2018 speak it was a protocol and companies were
joining and it was going to be the it's not mad they were called that at the time do you remember
this coin facebook's cryptocurrency i'm gonna look it up facebook's maybe there was also one
that was like three different businesses trying to launch something and it was pretty high it was
like chase or jp morgan yeah maybe luna that might have been different it was libra is libra
It was a permissioned blockchain-based stablecoin payment system proposed by Facebook.
Now it's called Diem, D-I-E-M, and it was a total flop.
So stock can work, but you can also say that not everything a company does is smart.
Expected to work, yeah.
Okay. I posted a list this week of eight businesses with big network effects. There were some comments, too, on companies that I was missing. But my question to you, who do you think has done the best job, in this case, screwing up their network effect?
uh okay that's harder than i thought i thought you're gonna paypal's out there for me
to be honest i would say like here's the thing venmo's network effect is still strong
for anyone that doesn't know it's a subsidiary i mean the paypal is the transfers they have
worked as hard as possible to throw at venmo it's they have done nothing it's
but they haven't done it slow but i use it all the time great network effect but i think the core
like the money transfer paypal sending money to other people that was a wonderful network effect
and their simple unwillingness to drop take rates
has just attracted competitors unlike anything like you've seen the money transfer business has
really just that industry has erupted over the last decade because people are trying to get
into it because paypal frankly takes a ridiculous fee so i don't know maybe that's me griping as a
customer but it seems like that is a clear network effect that has they have invited competition i
don't know if they screwed it up but they invited competition they definitely saw a lot of self
inflicted wounds there another one used to be the owner of paypal ebay oh yeah that was a big
network effect too i like how you put etsy in these eight ones why does etsy always get tossed
in there i don't think it's like we got the best companies in the world and then etsy
it makes sense it makes sense though it's developing potentially i think that is a
business that you've got unique selection now part of the problem is they've strayed a little
bit away from the unique selection but they've just really grown their active sellers because
i think it's a like it's a differentiated marketplace where you can get unique items
and that to me makes it feel like more of a sustainable network effect but they just can't
really tamper with that they don't want to start getting like commoditized stuff u-haul that's
another network effect that i didn't talk about someone just commented that he says u-haul while
not screwing up their network can be way more aggressive in their pricing for rentals no one
moves and thinks i'm gonna get a penske to move yeah potentially people do go to u-haul first that
is kind of the known brand but i think i don't think it people look up like moving trucks yeah
near me i mean yeah i can see an easy google advertisement on that where you see that u-haul
is really expensive you go wait wait wait let me look up an alternative and that's easy google
like but you all they are the most that think about the sponsor how much that sponsor listing
is for you all alternative that's that's got to be quite a nice advertisement there yeah the
it is the known brand and because you have to have those nodes in so many different cities
it i think is valuable in that way where you can pick up your u-haul in seattle but you can drop
it off anywhere when you move that's big but uh i guess i don't know the industry well enough i'd
be surprised if there were other moving businesses that weren't similar in terms of places you could
drop them off and having that kind of different node model okay yeah etsy is an underrated network
effect i think the marketplaces people got marketplace happy a couple years ago i think
maybe that pandemic had something to do with it etsy's is fairly strong although their gmv i just
looked it up kpis on old finch out there has uh has stagnated since 2021 maybe they'll fix that
maybe that was just the code would bump and they're actually you know kind of the underlying
growth is growing but it is kind of funny that they had an actual surge in gmv from masks
yeah but that's what's potentially hurting them as we comp that period yeah it is interesting
remember when things like thread up poshmark were getting pitched as the next network effects like
just wait they're building the marketplace man what's your i was a believer in poshmark for a
while hey they got bought out you would have been right technically uh yeah i was i was a believer
when they were like net cash yeah they were trading trading below net cash or something like that
what's the most we'll wrap up here soon what's the most underrated network effect you had a lot of
you know responses there i'm assuming that's tough well uh upslope capital mentioned some
of the financials businesses like the exchanges the cme was one anywhere where you need i think
especially with the bond exchanges like you need someone on the other side and so the places that
have the most uh the most buyers are going to be such high value so market access people don't
really yeah market access that's one people don't really talk about those ones i like those
what if i what if i propose that visa and mastercard are the most underrated
network effect just because it's way way better than people think
whatever i guess the but it's like uh yeah it is like when someone says tiger woods is underrated
that is an impregnable network effect probably the most
unstoppable network effect because you've had everyone try to stop it right like like the
governments have tried to build their own yeah china and india consolidation from like capital
one here i'd be very surprised if anything disrupts them so yeah i guess you could say
it's underrated but i think when people think network effect fees and master car probably the
first two that come to mind yeah okay let's get some comments and then we'll wrap things up
okay we had the u-haul one railroads and cell towers were the original networks i guess that's
Yeah, Fits.
Carvana.
I'll say TBD on that one.
How is that a network effect?
I think buyers and sellers in the marketplace.
Right, right, okay.
We got ICE.
It's not the government agency.
The exchange.
Moody's, FICO.
FICO's a good one, although I think...
Yeah, there's a lot of...
Network effect is not the first...
That is not the first competitive advantage that comes to mind for me when I look at, like, Moody's and FICO.
Yeah.
I think that's more brand slash social proof slash reputation.
Yeah.
All right.
Well, I think that's a great place to wrap up.
Thank you for everyone that joined.
As a reminder, we do these live on YouTube, 12.30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
But you can listen to it on your podcast player of choice.
If you liked this episode, and if you're listening now, I think you liked it because
you're an hour in at this point, give us a five-star review on either Apple Podcasts or
Spotify or follow the show on YouTube. It is the best way to say thank you and support these free
episodes. Also, subscribe to our newsletter called Chit Chat Stocks and get all sorts of updates
on the show. We've had recently on the newsletter follow-up questions with our friend Lou Whiteman
on the show on Boeing that came out yesterday or earlier this week, if you're on the podcast.
Now, let me hit the disclosure. We are not financial advisors. Anything we say on this
show is not formal advice or recommendation. Ryan, I, or any podcast guests may hold securities
discussed in this podcast. We may have held them in the past and we may buy, sell, or hold any of
these stocks in the future. Thank you everyone for tuning in and we'll see you next week.
