Chit Chat Stocks - Yelp: A Forgotten Small-Cap Stock I’m Buying Today (Ticker: YELP)
Episode Date: October 15, 2025On this episode of Chit Chat Stocks, Ryan goes through a research report on a small-cap stock trading at under 10x earnings hiding in plain sight: Yelp (ticker: YELP). We discuss: (00:00) Introductio...n (01:48) History (09:24) Business model (18:00) Competition Landscape: (24:23) Competitive advantage (31:30) Financial Performance (32:28) User Growth Trends and Insights (37:39) Advertising Dynamics: Services vs. Retail (40:35) Financial Performance and Margin Expansion (50:54) Management Trust and Compensation Concerns (55:26) Why Ryan is buying the stock ***************************************************** JOIN OUR EMAIL NEWSLETTER AND CHAT COMMUNITY: https://chitchatstocks.substack.com/ ********************************************************************* Chit Chat Stocks is presented by Interactive Brokers. Get professional pricing, global access, and premier technology with the best brokerage for investors today: https://www.interactivebrokers.com/ Interactive Brokers is a member of SIPC. ********************************************************************* Fiscal.ai is building the future of financial data. With custom charts, AI-generated research reports, and endless analytical tools, you can get up to speed on any stock around the globe. All for a reasonable price. Use our LINK and get 15% off any premium plan: https://fiscal.ai/chitchat ********************************************************************* Portseido is your best portfolio tracking & reporting solution that helps you track all investments in one place. We personally use the software to track our portfolio returns across brokerage accounts. Try it for free today: https://portseido.com/?fpr=ryan63 ********************************************************************* Disclosure: Chit Chat Stocks hosts and guests are not financial advisors, and nothing they say on this show is formal advice or a recommendation. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Welcome to Chit Chat Stocks. On this show, hosts Ryan Henderson and Brett Schaefer analyze
businesses and riff on the world of investing. As a quick reminder, Chit Chat Stocks is a
CCM Media Group podcast. Anything discussed on Chit Chat Stocks by Ryan, Brett, or any
other podcast guest is not formal advice or recommendation. Now, please enjoy this episode.
Welcome to the Chit Chat Stocks podcast, the podcast to help you find your next great investment.
Today, we have a stock research report episode for you.
Research by Ryan.
The company is Yelp, a company you, as a listener, at least in the United States, probably know of.
A potentially forgotten internet asset trading at less than 10 times earnings.
We're going to explore its business model history and whether Ryan is considering adding shares to
his portfolio. I'm excited for this one because it is a company that whenever you hear about this
stock, I just go, eh, it's getting killed by Google. That's what I think. And then I just
completely disregard that. But if you look at the financials, they're actually doing sneakily well.
We're going to get to all that. But before we do anything else, before you do anything else,
the listener consider giving this podcast a five-star review wherever you are listening
spotify apple podcast wherever it's the best way to support the show now let's get to the episode
ryan we're going to start with the history because this is a fascinating silicon valley style story
what is the history of yelp and how do we get to where we are today yeah i'm going to go through
the yelp story but before i do and i usually don't do this during our episodes but people that listen
to the show regularly, know that we use fiscal AI all the time. I was able to, I think this is
the first time I've ever done this, where I was able to literally do every component of the
research process through fiscal AI because it had all the segment KPI data. It had all the
transcripts, conference calls, events, 10K, everything was on there. And maybe for the
first time ever i could not find any other research reports on yelp so i wasn't able to
borrow anyone else's conviction i had to uh build this one entirely on my own and it'd be a good
sign of an opportunity no one's looking at this yeah i always kind of it's a little tougher when
you can't get up to speed on an idea quickly by looking at someone else's research report
But it sometimes allows you to build much stronger conviction and identify an idea that other people may have skipped over.
So when most people hear the name Yelp, I imagine they think of some Web 2.0 company or a website from the early days of the internet.
And that is partly correct.
So it was founded in 2004, I believe.
However, Yelp has evolved over the years and today is bigger than it has ever been.
So it has more users, pretty much has more users than it's ever had.
There's kind of some gray area in that number.
It has more revenue than it has ever had.
It has more profits than it has ever had.
And simultaneously, it has the cheapest valuation that it's ever had.
And by a long shot, it's just been a story of multiple compression over the last decade.
The digital world is a lot different today than when Yelp was founded, but the core drivers of
Yelp's business actually haven't really changed too much. So it's worth going back in time and
seeing why Yelp was founded in the first place. So in 2004, two developers named Jeremy Stoppelman
and Russell Simmons were working at a business incubator run by Max Levchin. That might be a
familiar name for some people i believe he's the ceo of a firm today that's correct yeah i was
going to say the same thing founder of a firm and i think still running it as of this recording
yeah and stoppelman had been the vp uh and stoppelman i'm going back to that one of the
co-founders of yelp he had been the vp of engineering at x.com this was prior to twitter
becoming x.com. This was the original x.com, which as people that know their business history,
you know that x.com eventually was renamed slash merged into PayPal, which is where Stoppelman met
Max Levchin. So Stoppelman is technically one of the members of the PayPal mafia, probably one of
the least known members, I would argue, but nonetheless, he was critical in sort of the
early days of PayPal and x.com. Anyways, as the story goes, Stoppelman got sick.
This is kind of the Genesis story. He got sick, needed to find a doctor. He wasn't familiar with
the Silicon Valley, San Francisco area. So he tried to look for crowdsource referrals online
and could not find any good ones. And that was apparently the inspiration for wanting to build
what is now known as yelp so like i said he was working at uh max levchin's business incubator
he pitched the idea to levchin levchin apparently said uh i don't really think it's a good idea but
you two are two very good developers and you seem very into it so i'll give you a million dollars
which i it's kind of a sound philosophy honestly like if even though you don't see the vision if
you think really highly of the founders and you have the money to spare and you know that they're
going to work hard to build it and build it out it makes sense as an investment i'd be surprised if
i imagine that's how a lot of vc investing is done in sort of the early seed rounds anyways
to kickstart the platform they purchased a database of over 20 million local businesses
apparently this database was a little spotty but it gave them sort of a
a jumpstart for actually building the platform and then they tried to aggregate your reviews
the first iterations were based around it was a flop they tried to have like email invites
to review on yelp and it it really didn't take off like maybe they got a couple but they were
having a hard time getting people to give reviews and then there was one button that said like want
to review this business or whatever on Yelp. And they noticed when they looked at the data that
that was the one that kept getting clicked. So there was a lot of engagement from people that
were not being invited, but just general visitors to the site that wanted to review a certain
business. That is what basically allowed them to build on even what is now Yelp today. So
the story from there was pretty simple. Any customers could review a business.
This created one of the early internet network effects, right? Because then you've got businesses
on there, tons of businesses, tons of customers, tons of reviews, creates more and more value for
future customers because they have this massive repository of reviews. And from there, it was just
a big success. In 2009, Google tried to acquire them for $500 million. Ultimately, the negotiations
failed. Apparently, Steve Jobs called Stoppelman and told him he shouldn't accept the Google
acquisition, which doesn't make sense. Sometimes Jobs is a little creepy
with the phone calls. He did the same thing to Danielek, a little threatening style.
And what's an interesting part of this, when Google brought in Yelp, there are allegations
that they essentially looked at the product
and then decided to copy a lot of the features for Google Maps.
And that's where that direct competition started to play.
Yeah, and you see that today.
I mean, there's still obviously direct competition.
But if we continue on in the story,
the negotiations failed.
Google did not acquire them.
Yelp decided to go public in 2012
and they got a $900 million valuation.
Within two years of their IPO, they had a $7 billion market cap.
Fast forward a decade, so that was 2014.
Today, 2025, they have six times more revenue and just a $1.9 billion market cap.
So it has been a rough decade for Yelp shareholders.
But I think we've – despite good financial performance, I should also add that.
They have turned – we're going to talk about the sort of turning on the profit machine and growing revenue at a double-digit annual rate for a decade.
So despite all that, bad returns for shareholders from the high, even from IPO, but potentially it's an interesting time to visit this because I think the business model is shifting a bit.
Okay, let's look at the business today.
how has it evolved? Where are they making money? What drives Yelp in 2025?
Yeah, the business model, how the business model actually works is very straightforward. This is
not one of those complex businesses where it's going to take a ton of time to describe how it
works. They run ads. So there are nearly 8 million claimed businesses on the platform,
and users have submitted more than 300 million cumulative reviews for those businesses.
This is the most important thing to understand about the company.
The massive repository of real consumer reviews for local businesses
is very difficult to replicate.
And it is why people constantly come back to Yelp today.
I mean, that's...
The only person that could...
Sorry, only company that could replicate it easily is Google.
and that's their main competition i'd say although we're getting into the evolving of the business
model later and how they're competing with some other players this might be something they don't
talk about but are they licensing to kind of google's ai competitors such as open ai or
perplexity is that could that be a part of the business model because i could see yelp similar
to reddit being a huge asset for these ai tools yeah they said that they are on a 10 million arr
rate for uh data licensing keep in mind they have i think it's like 1.4 billion in total revenue
i should actually probably know that figure but we'll get to that later yeah i've got all the
segment revenue but i think it's around 1.4 billion so it's really a small piece of the pie
right now and i imagine it'll stay that way would be my guess i mean it could maybe it gets to 100
million arr at some point margin though rent yeah i mean pretty much zero cost but
it's not gonna it's not gonna be as big on the top line uh as the advertising business that
Yelp has. And I just double-checked. Yes, 1.4, 1.5 billion in the last 12-month revenue. So
yeah, 10 million in ARR, still kind of a drop in the bucket for them.
But the primary way that Yelp monetizes its platform is through cost-per-click ads. So
Yelp allows businesses to promote themselves in various spots throughout the app and website.
That includes sponsored search results, ads on competitors' Yelp pages, as well as other areas throughout the user experience.
The majority of these ads are performance-based.
So they have a digital auction system that prices on a CPC basis, and businesses pay a fee when a consumer clicks on their ads.
If you want me to go more into depth on that, I'm not going to go too much into it.
there are a lot of tweaks that they've built out over the years to the algorithm so they create
sort of dynamic pricing based on how many people are searching for that uh that type of service at
that time so you know it's very demand-based and the cpc changes based on the different uh services
as well the different business types but you can see why google wanted to buy them this is the
internet yeah this is meta instagram facebook google they all run basically the cpc model for
the most part uh the other way that they that makes up 95 of their revenue but they can also
offer this is kind of a funny way to monetize in my opinion but they offer upgrade packages
for business pages so some of this is like you can be verified like you get a little badge you
kind of like Twitter does. And that's part of the upgrade package. The other part is you have to pay
in the upgrade package, it prohibits competitors from advertising on your page. So if you want
competitors to not advertise on your page, you can pay for the upgrade package. That's only like
5% of revenue at the most. I think it's probably less actually. But really the big one here is
Advertising. Advertising accounts for 95% of Yelp's revenue. And when you think of Yelp, at least when I was starting this research, when I think Yelp, I think restaurants. I think retail places, right? That is not the biggest part of Yelp's business anymore.
So today, 32% of Yelp's revenue comes from restaurants and retail businesses advertising.
64% comes from services businesses advertising.
And Brett's sharing a chart here that's fiscal data that tracks it.
So thank you, Fiscal AI.
When I'm talking about services businesses, I'm talking about things like home services.
So plumbers, electricians, landscapers, auto services, so mechanics, auto repair shops, that kind of stuff, professional services even, so lawyers, accountants, real estate agents.
Think of those services professions, not the falafel place next door.
You might leave a review.
There's probably more reviews for the restaurants and retail, but the advertising is much more valuable to those professional services type customers.
And then within services, the two biggest are home services and auto. So those are kind of – when you think about who is the audience that's driving Yelp, who's the customer base that's driving Yelp, you got to think plumbers, electricians, auto repair shops, mechanics, that kind of demographic.
And the reason this is so important is because A, it's not as competitive as restaurants and retail. The restaurant and retail category is so competitive. We'll talk about that more in a bit. But B, it's a much higher ticket industry.
So services professionals are willing to pay a higher cost per click than a restaurant would because instead of a $30 meal, they're maybe landing a $1,000 job or a $2,000 job, right?
So you can see this in the numbers.
Yelp's spend per customer type, last quarter, the average spend per services business was $926.
The average spend per restaurant and retail business was $440.
So services professionals pay two times more on average than the restaurant and retail side of things.
This is the direction they are heading.
It's what management emphasizes on the calls.
It is where they've made some acquisitions to kind of build out their product strategy.
It's been focused on the services side of things.
The retail, it's great.
It's nice to have.
they can sell that data to llms and stuff like that but they aren't i think they've basically
got it on autopilot at this point is how i would describe it maybe they i mean they're probably
still you know they've got some developers focused on it but when we zoom out 10 years
or look out 10 years my guess is that the vast majority of advertising revenue will come from
services professionals. Before we move on, we want to talk about our friends at Interactive
Brokers. Interactive Brokers is our favorite brokerage platform. They make it easy to buy
stocks, ETFs, options, futures, currencies, bonds, and more, all from a single unified platform.
And Interactive Brokers allows you to maximize your returns by minimizing your costs. They offer
zero commissions on US stocks and low commissions on international securities. They aren't cutting
corners either. Interactive Brokers, one of a kind smart routing technology, gets you the lowest
price possible in 36 countries and 28 different currencies. Interactive Brokers is our home for
stock trading and we wouldn't go anywhere else. If you're getting serious about investing, it's time
to upgrade to a broker that you can trust. Head on over to IBKR.com. Restrictions apply.
Interactive Brokers is a member of SIPC. Okay, let's talk about competition. They're talking
about, or excuse me, they've changed their business model to more of the services side of things.
And that has actually changed the competition a bit from, as maybe listeners were thinking,
Google and Apple Maps and maybe majority Google and just Google Search, Google Reviews,
all of that stuff competing with, say, restaurant reviews to, as we're going to get into it,
I didn't even think about it, competing with the likes of Angie and other services like that.
Take us through the competition. When you researched this company, how did you look at
the competitive space? What are your thoughts? And do they have any competitive advantages?
Yeah. When you think of the original Yelp value proposition, so let's go back to that first
example, the local falafel place, writing a good or bad review for that local restaurant.
That market has become very, very crowded. And frankly, Yelp is losing. So nowadays,
people are going straight to Google or Apple Maps and looking up food near me and just going
through the business pages that way. Or they are finding reviews through social media. Think
Instagram, TikTok, Reddit. And actually, I'll say anecdotally, I see my friends do that a lot.
They'll find businesses on either some sort of an Instagram video that recommends like top 10,
or they'll just look up the name of the restaurant and they can get reviews that way as well.
And then the other one is browsing reservation services even. So like OpenTable or Resi,
They'll go through there.
And then the last one, and the one that's become really sort of a bit of a headwind lately, has been the food delivery services like DoorDash and Uber Eats.
So a lot of people are just not going through Yelp anymore when they order food or they want to go to just a pure retail concept.
That space is really crowded.
I imagine Yelp is going to lose business there over time.
On the services side, Yelp still competes against the internet giants to some degree. So Apple and Google Maps, depending on what sort of business you're looking up. Like if you're just looking up an auto repair shop, there's probably some competition with Apple and Google Maps there, but not nearly as much as they compete with them on the restaurant and retail side.
So getting localized content, localized reviews on contractors or service professionals is a lot
harder on social media for the most part. So Yelp's primary competition looks like it comes
from other marketplaces. So yes, obviously Apple, Google Maps, still a threat there.
But the big ones that they're kind of taking share from are Angie. That's really the
big one. And then Thumbtack, which is more VC backed, growing pretty quickly, apparently.
I think it's estimated about $400 million in revenue, growing like 20% something year over
year. So nothing too crazy, but Thumbtack and Angie, I think are the two big ones there.
On this side of the business, Yelp strategy seems to be working. So I've got a chart here.
it's just yelp's services advertising revenue versus angie's and three years ago and she was
doing almost two billion dollars in revenue yelp services was doing like half a billion 670 million
to be exact i don't want to throw out too many numbers but today it's almost equal so angie's
doing just a billion roughly in revenue and yelp services is doing 925 million so
So for anyone just listening, just picture two charts converging as they go to the right.
Basically, Angie's losing revenue.
Yelp is gaining.
It's a classic market share taker situation for Yelp.
I think – I don't see any reason why this wouldn't continue.
And the more reviews that they build out for this professional services side, the more valuable it becomes, right?
There's still a network effect there to some degree.
And so I think they continue to drive value for users with reviews, but really drive value for the services professionals as well.
So I tried this out the other day.
I was trying to look for an oil change, and I went to Yelp, saw a business for an oil change, and there's like a request a quote button, for example.
I request a quote. And then if you're a business, you can subscribe to anytime someone requests
like an oil change quote. If you're a competitor, you can send them an email and give a quote as
well. So I got like four emails right away with competing offers on the lowest cost oil change.
I just filled in my car info, stuff like that. And all of a sudden it's lead gen for these auto
auto shops as well. So there's a lot of value that they're driving specifically with services
professionals. And I would guess that they can do well purely just eating Angie's lunch, basically.
Makes sense. I just did a check right now. I, you know, starting on Google, as I assume a lot
of these do, I looked up good auto repair shops near me. There's some sponsored listings, some
Google Maps stuff. But then the first one is 10 auto repair shops in basically the town I live in
on Yelp. So I guess they've worked with that strategy. It's done well. My question is,
and maybe they talk about this, are they still beholden to the Google ecosystem? And
what do you think about the changing landscape of people maybe using OpenAI or Gemini? I guess
still a google product but a different type and how that could affect this business do you think
there's a risk it eventually goes the same way as the restaurant side of things or is this an
entirely different market sector well it helps that they have a direct relationship with their
customers in some capacity so there's 30 million unique app users that log on to the yelp app
and can start their search that way the majority of searches are still from either desktop or
mobile web so yes they are still beholden to gold to google and other ai players but
that's been the case for 20 years and they've been able to drive value for service professionals
over the, especially over the last five to 10 years, despite Google being the number one driver
of demand for them. So I think they've gotten good at playing this SEO game. I mean, you saw it,
for example, you just looked up, what was it? Oil changes near me, something like that. And
you got Yelp. Yelp knows how to surface to the top of those searches. So it is still a risk.
obviously they don't own their entire customer base like at least not as much as like an airbnb
does for example airbnb i think the majority of their bookings come directly from the app that's
that's not the case for yelp but it's it's led i think it's alleviated that risk a bit by having
basically 30 million unique users that use the yelp app you know one thing i was thinking of
is you have google maps the uber eats door dashes you have the social media ones um with services a
little different you might have google reviews as well but maybe less social media and you
obviously don't have uber eats or door dash since that's restaurant only
with all of maybe i'd call it um it's not necessarily fake reviews but almost paid
reviews or getting friends and family to review you even though you that they're not you know
an objective customer i feel like getting you know burned by these type of things before like
oh google maps high reviews but it's a terrible product or what have you or people just get paid
for social media influencers to review stuff and you can't really trust that that much as well at
least from my opinion i feel like going to yelp can be maybe more of a trusted source is that how
they try to play and that's is that what your thing is they're positioning in the market um
after researching them yeah i mean this kind of comes back to a topic we talk about all the time
on the show, which is focus matters for companies, Google's not going to do that much to manage the
review system for businesses on Google Maps or whatever. Yelp, it's critical for their business.
So they have a whole bunch of AI automation detection systems that they've put in place
over the last 15 years to verify that reviewers are who they say they are, that it's credible,
that they have been a customer before that the review itself is helpful so i tried to like write
a review and they make sure that you have like certain criteria in each review and there's always
going to be review faking to some degree i think you there's only so much you can do to avoid that
But Yelp's, in my personal experience, seems to be some of the most credible and most reliable reviews of the different aggregators.
Do you think Yelp has a competitive advantage?
If so, why?
If no, why not?
And how could it change over the next five years?
Yeah, it's tough.
I would not call this a wide moat business.
I can say that confidently.
But they do have a competitive advantage relative to some of the startups because they have a massive repository of reviews and there's some name notoriety and it's almost like leverage.
It's the only leverage that customers have that they can write a Yelp review if the experience isn't great type of thing.
And so there's, there's some value in the name and there's some value in the repository of reviews. The thing that I think is unique specifically within the services professional side, when you, when you look at like a restaurant or a retail shop, they all have their own website.
They have their own landing page.
So Google can dominate there.
With services professionals, they don't always have that.
They need someone that's almost like a do it for me or give me just the building blocks to list my services on Yelp directly as opposed to a specific website.
So it can be almost a content management system for some of these services professionals, as well as a lead generator for them.
So that I think is a big differentiator is it doesn't take much to list your business page.
Obviously, you can do that on Google Maps as well.
But I think when it comes to Google, most people are looking for a website, whereas Yelp, you don't need one.
but no i i wouldn't say this is a super wide competitive advantage but within the services
category i think it i think it's a growing one and could they expand it over the next five years
and if so what metrics are you tracking just cumulative reviews number of listings do they
get out of any kpis investors can look at yeah the biggest things to know whether the moat is
growing within services are services advertising locations. So basically the number of advertisers
in the services division or services like reporting segment, and then users. Those are
the two KPIs you can track. And obviously like if advertising revenue is growing within the
services side, that is a function that it's a result of the marketplace working. So that is
the number to track. Ultimately, you're not going to have a whole bunch of advertising revenue
growth on the services side if it's not working because it's cost per click. So if it's not
resulting in customers, the spend will diminish. But if you're seeing user growth and services
advertiser growth, that is a sign that that network effect within that specific segment is
expanding. Let's talk about financials and users. Are they growing? What does the growth look like?
And what do you think about their future growth prospects from both earnings revenue,
as well as more people utilizing Yelp services? It seems like a simple question. Is Yelp growing?
But it's not that simple of an answer. So there are some businesses where it's so easy to know
whether a company is going to grow in the future. For example, will Costco grow revenue over the
next five years, I think everyone would say with almost 100% certainty, yes, revenue sales across
all of corporate Costco or the entire Costco store base will grow. For Yelp, it's not so simple.
Their total annual users sank dramatically in 2020. So when COVID hit, the people that were
visiting Yelp dropped like 25%. Surprisingly, it hasn't really recovered since. Now, there were
some changes in how they report. So they wanted to make sure that the number was more accurate,
which kind of hurt them on a reporting basis. So like December 2021, or I guess 2021 figures
overall, they had 135 million unique users. 2022, they had 125 million. So it looks like
they're declining, but that was actually an adjustment in the reporting method.
So over the last two to three years, users to the site, and I'm talking about the customer base
here, or sorry, the user base, not the customer base. So I'm talking about individuals,
has been growing, which is nice. And I got some third-party data from one of the third-party
data providers, Apptopia, which someone reached out to me from the Apptopia team and they sent
me some data. So thank you for doing that. And monthly active users across the app is growing.
It's heading in the right direction. I think it was like six to 7% annual growth.
So on that side of the equation, if you look out seven years, it doesn't look like it's growing.
If you look out 12 months, 24 months, things look pretty good. And
i guess i'd call it a wash it's like is the user base growing i'd say it's basically flat
and my projections would be maybe it grows one to two percent a year over the next decade but
you're not going to see i would be very very surprised if you saw a huge jump in users
because look this has been an internet asset for 20 years i think you have a pretty good sense of
the size and the draw from customers.
Are they going to usage of the actual mobile app?
Because I would feel like you mentioned that Airbnb asset that they have where people begin
their search within the mobile app.
If you can get more and more people to join the mobile app, I'd say, and use it obviously
as a monthly active user, that would help expand the competitive advantage and reduce
that Google risk over the long term.
Yeah. So there's two different segments that they report. There's mobile web users and then mobile app users. There's about 30 million mobile app users and 40 million mobile web users. Obviously, I think you'd rather have that journey begin on the mobile app, but it doesn't hurt to have both. So 30 million is about what they report.
Ryan, I'm seeing on your data here, you might have mixed it up. 40 million desktop users, 60 something million.
Yeah, mix them up. So 63, 64 million mobile web users, 30 million mobile app users. Desktop is the one that was at like 40 million.
but it's first of all in general i'd say it's better that the journey is starting on mobile
because it's less dominated by google although it is still mobile web for the time being remains
dominated by google but it it's easier to get them onto the app that way also and they they
this is goes back to the reporting change that they had there was apparently a lot of people
that had like they had the mobile app or there were like engagement farms or bots and stuff that
they were detecting and they they got to the point where i was making sure that it was true
engagement on the mobile app is the number that they are actually reporting so it's engaged users
on the mobile app so this is kind of the bare minimum i'd say in terms of maybe people that
visiting the site like it's a true authentic figure as opposed to some companies that maybe
don't go through the effort to to find the actual number of people that are uh people as opposed to
bots i should say but yes more and more towards mobile is great that that is i think the goal
but it's basically been flat so far so i don't know i'll say i'd say we'll see like it was at
31 million in 2020 today it's at almost 29 million so mobile app users haven't made that
great of progress but some of that has been the reporting like i said i the alt data that i was
seeing is that seven percent mau growth on the mobile app over the last 12 months so
this is where i said it's a simple question hardly a simple answer it's hard to know
whether the user side of things is growing the advertiser side it's very easy to tell it is
growing and well advertising revenue is growing but there's an interesting dynamic that's going
on here so if you look at retail and restaurant locations the number of advertisers has just
continuously dropped over the last five years services advertisers has continuously grown over
the last five years. And actually last quarter for the first time ever, there were more services
businesses advertising on Yelp than there were restaurant and retail. But keep in mind, the
services are also paying twice as much on average as the restaurant and retail. So at this point,
it is a much larger business for them. I think over time, it's kind of like good company,
bad company situation where over time, as long as the services side continues to grow,
it should eventually start to offset any declines from the restaurant and retail.
Does that make sense?
100%. Okay. Let's move on to the financials. The profit margin chart you're going to talk
about here is, let's say, optimistic. But as you're going to go through, they may have even
more potential to expand these margins and their goals. Well, maybe an activist, let's say,
could just be helpful here to get them to accelerate as you're about to talk about,
oh, we're going to drop our SPC as a percentage of revenue by two percentage points by 2027.
The goals might be a little bit tepid, but go through the financials, the profit margins,
which I would think is the biggest part of the story here as a lower growth business.
And how are you thinking about it with building a financial model?
This episode is presented by our brand new partner, Port Sido.
Do you know what your actual investment returns are?
Well, if you're like me, then the answer is probably no.
And that means you need to try Port Sido.
Port Sido is the ultimate portfolio performance tracker.
With Port Sido, you can easily aggregate your various brokerage accounts and instantly see your actual investment returns.
That includes all your investments too.
stocks, ETFs, even crypto, if that's your thing, you no longer have to guess what your returns are.
With Port Sido, you can find out in minutes whether or not you are actually beating the
market. And that includes a dividend tracking dashboard and even tracking of short positions.
I have been looking for a tool like this for a long time because I was sick and tired of
tracking it manually and Port Sido has finally built it. If you want to find out what your
real returns are, check out Port Sido. The link will be in our show notes.
All right, folks, before we move on, we need to tell you where we get our financial data.
Fiscal.ai. Fiscal.ai is the complete stock research platform for fundamental investors.
I use the platform pretty much every single day. You'll see the charts on our podcast and you'll
see it in our newsletter. This is our one-stop shop for stock research. They've got up to 20
years of financial data on all companies globally, including company-specific segment and KPI data.
That means Amazon AWS revenue, SoFi's total members, Google's paid clicks growth, and literally millions of more data points.
They've also got earnings call transcripts, ownership data, company-specific research reports, and much more.
If you want complete financial data at your fingertips, then you need to check out Fiscal.ai.
And if you use our link, fiscal.ai slash chitchat, you will get 15% off any paid plan.
Again, that is fiscal.ai slash chitchat.
The link will be in the show notes.
Yeah, Brett mentioned it.
This, for people that are listening, if you're thinking of an operating margin chart, this
is one of those beautiful operating margin charts that you want to see, where seven years
ago, operating margins were 2%.
Today, they're 13%, and it's just gradually grown.
So management seems to have managed their expense base well while still growing revenue in the process.
But I'm going to read a quote from the 10K here.
It says – this was a part of their profitable growth segment that they wrote out.
It says, operating on a distributed basis has allowed us to reduce our real estate footprint, which we expect to continue to benefit margin going forward.
As we reduced our reliance on the Bay Area for our hiring needs, we also made significant changes to our compensation mix throughout our organization to emphasize cash over stock.
As a result, we continue to expect our stock-based compensation expense as a percentage of revenue to decrease to less than 8% by the end of 2025.
We also now plan to reduce that to less than 6% by the end of 2027.
Second part here, we remain disciplined in our allocation of resources.
We plan to hold headcount approximately flat in 2025. We also plan to expand the use of AI in our business operations to drive efficiencies, reflecting our commitment to driving leverage in the business through our product-led strategy.
that is music to my ears if i'm a shareholder i mean that is what you want unless you have
a business where there's like a massive opportunity and runway in front of them
and they they are in that investment stage where you need to be laying out expenses today to
attract revenue in the future this is the situation you want you can get revenue growth
and hopefully zero operating expense growth it sounds like they're moving devs out of the bay
area or hiring devs more so out of the bay area they're allowing them to work remote they're
using ai as much as they can in the business and they're moving to cash compensation over stock
that especially especially at their current valuation is fantastic you don't want to be
giving away stock right now. And I'll say why in a second here, but the valuation is very attractive.
So as much as you can reduce that SBC, I think they could probably accelerate that even more,
which we'll talk about in a little bit. But yes, I think you should expect gap operating margins
to expand more and more over the coming years. And the good thing here is that they are using
virtually all of their cashflow to buy back shares. So I'm going to go over some of the
valuation work real quick. I'm sharing a shares outstanding chart for the listeners. I'm not sure
our recording studio seems to have changed their formatting. I'm not sure why they shared screens
are so much smaller. We'll try to fix that on future episodes if people can't see that.
But you can look at the shares outstanding chart, even with a slight bump during 2019 or 2020.
We go from 2017 through the last 12 months, shares outstanding have declined at about
a 4% annual rate.
And it looks like they've accelerated in recent quarters.
So pretty good.
And that's, hey, if you're taking that cash flow to buy back stock and you still are reducing
your shares outstanding while paying a large amount as SBC, and the plan for that is to
come down while the valuation as you're going to get into is trading at less than 10 times
earnings.
We could go from a 4% annual share count reduction to 6%, 8%, even 10%.
Yeah, over the last 12 months, they've reduced by 5.7%.
So it is accelerating.
Part of that is cash flow is growing and they're paying more towards buybacks.
But the other part is valuation continues to come down.
So you should expect, I think the buyback yield is at like, let me check this.
Keep in mind, buyback yield does not encapsulate stock-based compensation.
But the buyback yield is at 13.5% right now, which is worth –
So net 5% with that 8% SPC.
Yeah.
I don't think it works out exactly that way, but about 5% to 6% would be my guess.
But let's go back to some assumptions here.
Ultimately, you can do whatever valuation work you want, and I'm sure there are people
at small cap investment shops looking at this thing that are going to be much more precise
than I am. But whether or not Yelp ends up being a successful investment is going to come down to
the success of the services business. If that business grows, because keep in mind, they're
a higher paying customer and it's a decent sized market for them to go after, the stock is going
to be cheap any way you slice it. But if that business declines and the restaurant and retail
business declines, then we've got a totally different story. But here's sort of how I think
about things. These are the questions that if you're seriously looking to Yelp, I think you
need to ask yourself, how many advertising locations will there be in the future? How
many users will there be in the future? And what will the cost per click be?
those are here's my answers i think you're going to see declines in restaurant and retail
advertisers you're already seeing that so it should continue but eventually that'll be offset
by services advertiser growth second answer how many users will there be in the future
I think users will continue to grow gradually, especially as they keep building out this bigger and bigger repository of reviews for services professionals specifically.
Maybe it declines like total users.
Maybe it continues to like if you just look at the top level figure, it might decline because of the restaurant and retail pressure and people that are going to DoorDash instead of going to Yelp kind of thing.
But users going for services professionals listings, like users that are looking for that specific service, I suspect that will grow.
My estimate is two and a half percent a year, but honestly, the answer is I don't know.
I suspect it will be flat to slight growth.
The last question is what will the cost per click look like?
As advertisers shift more towards services, I think the cost per click is going to continue. It has grown by 8% a year over the last five years. I think 7% to 8% is going to continue because I would gladly pay $100 a month if I'm a, let's say, I don't know, carpenter or a plumber or something.
I'll gladly pay $100 a month for new leads
because I'm going to be collecting thousands in those leads.
It's a way higher ticket, way more value.
So I suspect that cost per click is going to continue to rise.
And then my last projection is I think they can go
from 13% operating margins today to 18% by 2030.
It might be a little aggressive,
but directionally, I think it's going to be right.
Well, I'm seeing on looked up fiscal
while you were talking here,
90% gross margins. This is a question I'm going to ask you, but this is what I would ask management
if I was an activist or a big shareholder, they got to talk to them. Why can't this be a 40%
operating margin business? What's stopping them? Yeah, I think that's a fair question.
I think they just have plans to get there much slower than what shareholders would probably want.
But let's just play off my assumptions here. So the assumptions I had is basically the financial equivalent of their services business is successful. If that happens, I think they'll be generating more than $400 million in operating income in 2030.
Right now, they have a $1.6 billion enterprise value. So that'd be four times 2030 operating income, but that doesn't even factor in the buyback. They trade at a current, so enterprise value, $1.6 billion divided by last 12 months earnings before interest and taxes is 8.9 times.
so if they are successful with the services business expansion it's it's going to be a
huge success and when you factor in the buyback either one of two things is going to happen
either they are going to be one of the best share cannibals of the next decade like let's say the
stock price didn't change and the services business grew they're just going to swallow up
shares and maybe be like one of those phenomenal share cannibals or they're going to get a
re-rating in the stock. One of two things has to happen in that situation. If the services
business is successful, is as successful as I think it'll be. Okay. No follow-ups. What's next?
Well, management. Okay. All right. No more on valuation?
No, no. I don't want to pour over numbers too much on this podcast. It is cheap. It's less
than nine times operating income trailing, and they are expanding margins rapidly.
All right, there we go. So let's talk management. The question we like to ask before making an
investment in a company, especially if our time horizon typically is three to five years
for most of the type of investments we're making, if not longer, we like to ask, do I trust the
management team to take care of shareholders? Not just shareholders. You got to care about
everyone within their ecosystem all the stakeholders but who runs yelp and ryan after researching
do you trust them so jeremy stoppelman is still the ceo the co-founder from 20 years ago 21 years
ago is still the ceo today i think he's done a good job navigating the business towards services
and he seems to finally be coming to the realization that yelp can simultaneously
increase profit margins and still grow revenue at the same time. So that is good. He seems to
have found religion on that front. However, as I was reading the proxy, I just found myself
getting more and more annoyed. And I'll go through why. So like most companies you look at,
Yelp's management team has a base salary, annual cash incentives, and then performance-based
stock bonuses. So restricted stock units, the performance-based restricted stock units come
down to two factors, one revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets, which I don't love adjusted
EBITDA targets, but whatever. This is very common with a lot of businesses, especially tech
businesses. So revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets. The second one is relative performance
versus their peer group on a trailing three-year basis now i really don't love relative return
based compensation hurdles however i was thinking okay well their stock has sucked so it's not like
they're getting paid out for it i was wrong their stock which is flat over the last 10 years it's
flat and over the last three years it was down eight percent last i checked somehow despite the
stock going down over the last three years they earned 50 of their target compensation for their
relative return well when your competitor is angie their peer group sucked i looked at them
it's horrible and i apparently it's based on industry which makes sense i guess if you're
doing a peer group relative return although i don't think you need that in the first place
and then market cap thresholds why does there need to be a market cap threshold for your relative
return i as an investor i'm not deciding between you and angie i'm deciding between you and google
and relative return just ban ban it's it's it's a it doesn't kill an investment but it is
frustrating to see. And this, as you're going through, looks like a very frustrating proxy
statement. Yeah. And as a company does well, like say they're in your peer group and they perform
well, so their market cap rises, you can just kick them out of your peer group. Oh, I don't
have to worry about them anymore. I can still hit my return hurdles. Thank God we could remove them.
So that part was disappointing. But here's what really, really upset me.
why is the co-founder and ceo who owns 6.3 percent of the company taking an extra 10 million dollars
in annual compensation in stock it's a good way to raise margin right there that could raise it by
half a percentage point maybe if we got rid of that yeah that is so dumb like he could just
reap the benefits from the share price increasing he owns 6.3 percent of the company if you need
cash pay a small dividend i put here the greatest trick that mckinsey ever pulled
was convincing the world that compensation consultants are good for shareholders
this is i don't even know if mckinsey is the consultant here but well it's just so yeah that
industry yeah well it is what it is if anyone uh it gets frustrated when researching companies
that seem like interesting investments
and then look at the proxy statement
and it makes you hesitant.
There's a book out there called
When McKinsey Comes to Town, I believe.
I'd recommend reading that.
It's a nice...
Well, you also get frustrated reading it,
but maybe it'll make you sleep better at night
knowing that you don't act as sometimes they did.
Back to Yelp, though.
do you think Yelp can beat the market?
Are you thinking of buying shares?
Is this a watch list stock, psychological short, psychological long?
What are you going to be buying shares?
What are your final thoughts here, Ryan?
Okay, despite the disappointments with the proxy statement,
I am still very compelled by the valuation.
I think I'm going to buy some shares.
It's going to be a starter position.
And the two metrics I'm tracking to raise my – the thing I am monitoring to potentially raise my position sizing is am I right about the services business?
Because if they have a unique method of approaching a valuable customer group, this could be a much bigger business and you're going to get the benefit of revenue growth plus operating margin expansion plus either multiple re-rating or huge stock buybacks, which is a recipe for great returns.
right and keep that going to help um not only with that upside but with the downside protection
as well i mean right now like is this the best business in the world no but you're at 14 times
pe ev to ebitda 7 ev to gross profit 1.3 so those operating margins keep expanding you know that
gross profit number is going to matter more and more and can just you know show up in the earnings
you probably do okay even if as you mentioned here the services business starts stagnating
going backwards with the stock fall maybe 20 percent from here yeah but it looks like
people are pricing in that this business is dying yeah if this was the best business in the world
it wouldn't trade it eight times earnings or nine times earnings so a sprouts farmers market traded
at eight times earnings no that's not but that's one that yeah it was a turnaround it improved too
right so this as much as it's like still the same management team it it could it's sort of
a turnaround in a way because it's a different business like customer base so i do think in a
best case scenario you get the financial growth of services business growing but it could turn
into a really differentiated digital asset for where like that marketplace expands that network
effect expands and everything angie wanted to be yelp could be and they can you know i'm kind of
going galaxy brain here but you could start to layer on some bookings on the platform and kind
of layering in or integrating commerce into it beyond just advertising because you can already
do a lot in the app and i want to keep kind of exploring it but i think if they can really
really build out that marketplace you've got a phenomenal return here and in my head this is not
a never sell like right now in its current state this is not a never sell stock but if they expand
that marketplace with services professionals and users grow with it especially the users that
matter then it could turn into one where it becomes sort of more of a never sell yeah kind
of think about them as they're playing defense a little bit today they could go on offense in the
future. And you're kind of looking at it as a almost buy in third strategy where you put a
starter position today, they keep proving themselves six months from now, you might buy a
little more even if the stock is like 50% higher or something like that. But the business is showing
that potential that you're looking for here. And then you could even buy more in the future,
despite it, if their business prospects work out as you think they could, the stock will likely be
higher, but it might be de-risked. Yeah. I think that's a fair way to put it.
What other shows do we have coming up? Okay. Yeah. Thank you, Ryan. We have some
interviews with, and this is without any particular order, Michael Fritzell from
Asian Century Stocks talking investing in Asia and Fairfax, India. We have a John Rotanti episode
coming in November, a bit of an evergreen episode on investing checklist. We're going to have
Rahar Jhark returning to the show to talk. And he's one of the foremost experts, I think,
overlapping with tech AI and investing in the mega cap technology companies, one of the sharpest
investors of that. We're going to be talking big tech and kind of all the chaos surrounding AI.
And we're going to have Dave Ahern from Investing for Beginners talking new holdings slash new
banks. A lot of fun interviews. We're also going to be doing a, even though we'll do an official
post to help people put some questions in, we're going to be doing a long form AMA episode in place
of one of the live power hours since Ryan and I will both be off for one week. So look out for
that. But a lot of fun stuff coming down the line. And as always, we're going to be doing the
investing power hours every week. Thank you to the listeners for this one. Hope you got something
been out of this episode, learned a bit about Yelp's business and potentially do your own
research, obviously buy or sell whatever you want, but hopefully you got some insights on
the potential investment. As a disclosure, we are not financial advisors. Anything we say on this
show is not formal advice or recommendation. Ryan, I, or any podcast guests may hold securities
discussed in this podcast, may have held them in the past and may buy, sell, or hold them
in the future. Thank you everyone once again, and we'll see you next time.
Thanks for watching!
