Clinton Jaws - Charlie Kirk: Piers Morgan vs Candace Owens - This Is Priceless

Episode Date: January 1, 2026

Charlie Kirk: Piers Morgan vs Candace Owens - This Is Priceless

Is she okay with you now continuing to talk about your theories or does she still want you to stop? I believe that thoroughly. Caddice you didn't say that. Apparently she did. I did say that on my entire show. You said there were people at turning point. Like I'm sorry. What is this?

This is like the people, the public is actually being abused. Okay. Let's not pretending that the victim is Rob McCoy. No, the public. Don't lie. Okay. Do you believe Erica Kirk has been lying about it? To his other-

I've never allowed to answer a single question that you say in entirety before you move on to the next question. You can't just keep talking at infinitesim. I'm allowed to ask you another question. What's going on? What's your theory? Why do you want to know why these planes

were tracking Charlie? Well, my theory. It's making you very wealthy. You're getting millions and millions of people coming in, which by the way, keep to normal. Candice, are your YouTube numbers up since you've been doing the Charlie Kirk investigations?

Answer it. Clinton Jaws. I know I'm not on here enough, and I know I'm going to get punished for it. Please like this video. It's the only thing I care about. You know what was great to see, it was great to see today, Pierce Morgan, rebounding. It was a comeback because I like the guy. I actually like both these people.

But he got destroyed with Nick Fuentes. Nick Fuentes destroyed him. I didn't like that part about it, but he completely lost. And it's good to see what? what he does today to Candace. It's the first time I've ever seen Candace, speechless. Let's watch.

It was great. I hope this video was only 10 minutes long and not 20. Let's see what I can do. Stop talking. How about that? This is where we're going to start. Candice had a meeting with Erica Kirk. You all know about it.

They sat down for four hours. Pierce asks, who else was in the meeting? She brings up a lawyer. It's interesting. So there were no lawyers, for example. example. No, no lawyers. But they did phone their lawyer because I asked the question. I was like, look, I'm open to being wrong, obviously. If there is something, which I think the media was kind of hinting at, that they had more, but they couldn't share it with the public. I said, I'm happy to

keep my mouth shut. And I want to feel good walking out of here that there is something there. There is some sort of a smoking gun. I won't tell anybody. This is just, this doesn't even make sense to me. And I will tell viewers just to be patient. And so they did call one of the lawyers working on his case. Why? And it was not convincing at all. He said, effectual, in effect, all we have is what the public has seen. She's the public. Do you really think a lawyer is going to tell her what they have? The lawyer doesn't even tell the victim family, being Erica Kirk. Candace Owens thinks she's above the public. I can't believe she said that. You know, I won't say nothing. I'm a podcaster with a big mouth. I won't say

anything. All we have is what the public has seen. Not true. And we won't know more because we're investigating and looking for more. And so we won't know more. Just made me go, why is everybody being so over the top and ridiculous and using the words like the evidence is overwhelming. It was Tyler Robinson when they don't have anything that's overwhelming. They don't have anything to show. But it's they've never, they didn't see it. They don't have a video of him taking the shot. Which I think was something that I assumed like, okay, there's all these cameras. Maybe they actually have that video. and they're waiting for a moment to release that to the public. They don't have that.

They're not releasing it to the public. Or at least... Do you believe that it is now most likely that Tyler Robinson killed Charlie Kirk? Just say Robinson or are the accused? Absolutely not. I haven't seen one piece of compelling evidence that Tyler Robinson scaled the rooftops like Spider-Man on a college campus that he didn't go to and fired one shot, a magic bullet shot, and killed Charlie Kirk.

was a perfect shot with a rifle. You know how long it took me? One hour. That's how long it took me. At police academy. I even got a fancy badge. One hour with a rifle. Anybody can shoot a rifle. Magic bullet. For some reason, Lance is being protected, which I find to be very strange. His own family thinks he's guilty of war. They'll get to it. Do you not think they're working on it? Lost over him. You know, we've caught the feds have lied a lot. It's just a fact. Turning Point USA, people have lied a lot. That is a fact. You've put up a lot of theories, but

a lot of them don't seem to have a clear conclusion from you about what you actually think happened. I mean, you've been all over this now ever since Charlie was killed. What do you believe happened to him? Who do you think killed him?

So I can't tell you definitively who pulled the trigger. I'm not going to lie to audiences and just put something out there that's not real. But, but What I can say is I feel convinced that the feds were involved. I can tell you that. I think the feds were involved in staging a cover up. I think Cash Patel knows what happened and didn't happen on that day.

I am convinced by me being told by people that are feds that he is not acting right and that he is not wanting to share any information. Just a couple of people are allowed to even see anything. A Fed told me that nobody's allowed to see it. Do you know how many files were private from me when I was a cop? They keep the file private for good reason. Do you want me to explain it? This video is going to be way too long if I do.

They can't even touch the Charlie Kirk file without the risk of being fired. The U.S. Marshals that were there when they were doing the quote unquote manhunt for 33 hours said that Cash Patel effectively sent them on a wild goose chase, which is what was signal to the public when he said, we got them and it was actually the wrong person. And so it caused people to stop looking because they were, convinced they had had the shooter.

They felt that that was in order to allow the real perpetrators of the crimes to get away. Makes sense now. That could just be the fog of the immediacy of these things. We've seen it at Brown University. Exactly of the same thing. They thought they had the killer. They thought they had the killer. It turned out to be the wrong person.

It doesn't mean there's any great conspiracy by the feds to cover anything up. And again, even if what you're saying is true, I don't know, maybe you're right. If what you're saying is true, what is it there covering up? This is not right. You've so far intimated or inferred something weird involving Egyptian planes. Weird. So, you know, what's that about? You've inferred perhaps Israeli involvement in some way.

Certainly inferred a lot of Turning Point USA involvement. That's a lot of people getting involved here in the murder of Charlie Kirk potentially. But what I'm really curious about is given you've been all over all this and you've been airing all these. theories. But which one is it? It can't be all of these things. Is it somebody, is it someone at Turning Point USA? I mean, who do you actually believe was behind this? Of course, it can be all of those things. And what's really ironic here is that there's a clip of Charlie in the last months leading up to his death where he speaks about a JFK assassination. Obviously for this to have been pulled off, there had to have been multiple people involved.

There had to have been people at turning point that were complicit in having this happen. Now, who knows what their motivations are? Complicit. maybe this point that were complicit in having this happen. It had to have been multiple people involved. There had to have been people at turning point that were complicit in having this happen. Now, who knows what their motivations are doesn't mean maybe this person's like, hey, I'm going to help you.

Hang on. Okay, let me stop you. Hang on. When you say obviously somebody at turning point, you are accusing right now people that worked with Charlie Kirk at the company he built, which is now run by his widow, you are directly accusing people in that company of being complicit in his murder. Right? I want to just be very clear of connecting that dot.

So I said that when there is a conspiracy, of course there are going to be multiple people involved. I want to get to the reality of what you're actually saying. So when you say that somebody at Turning Point USA, Charlie's company, was complicit in his murder, who? Who was? I believe that there were multiple people at Turning Point who are, as I have said many times, my exact words are,

They are engaged in a cover-up of what happened to Charlie on that day. No, but who was involved in his murder? I didn't say that they murdered Charlie. You said that people at Turning Point were complicit in his murder? No, my exact sentence that I said was that there were people at Turning Point who are engaged in a cover-up. I believe that thoroughly. Caddus, you didn't say that. Apparently you said literally.

I did say that on my entire show. You said there were people at Turning Point complicit in his murder. Okay. That's what you said. When you and I were discussing, that's why I said, let's go back. I was applying the logic of a conspiracy to JFK. I said, okay, if JFK, you have people that are complicit, of course, if you apply that logic, if there is a conspiracy,

there's going to be multiple people that are going to be complicit by the time in order for a large stage murder happen. You specifically said, you didn't say complicit in a cover-up. You said complicit in the murder. I can't even remember. Who at Turning Point was involved in his murder. Let me clarify for you. I believe that there are people at Turning Point who are engaged,

in covering up what happened on that day. But were any of them engaged in the planning of the murder of Charlie Kirk? I wouldn't know how it was planned. I cannot confidently make that statement. I can say confidently that I know they're engaged in the cover-up because I've been investigating what happened on that day and what transpired thereafter.

I've been clear. I've named those people on my show. I've said they are engaged in a cover-up, and I've listed the lies. So you don't have to try to make something out of what I didn't say. I tell you what I think it's already controversial. We don't need to get more controversial, okay? Candace believes that Turning Point is directly involved. Listen.

Absolutely did. You gave the names to Erica of two employees, current employees at Turning Point, who you believe were involved in the preparation for the murder of Charlie Kirk. Is that what you're saying? I told them that if I were in your shoes, these would be two employees that I would look further into. And what evidence do you have? Ryan Harpole.

Any prior knowledge of the murder? Because I don't have concrete evidence is the reason why I'm not naming them. So I've been responsible. I'm not saying. But you're telling the widow that these two people may have been involved in the murder. Why? You see the problem? Well, the evidence for it is people that they, there is not concrete evidence.

It's like you're trying to get me to say something that I never said and then asking me to defend it. I'm asking what evidence you've got. Yeah, what do you got? You're asking me privately, did I communicate to them that I think you should look further? That's called an investigation, peers, okay? So what you're doing is a strategy of like, if somebody is somebody is somebody, If somebody dies, you're saying to please, you can't ask any questions about anybody unless you have concrete evidence. We're at the stage of investigation.

I'm not saying that. Yes, you can. And let me give people in the public permission to do this. Follow your instinct. If you feel something is off, keep asking questions. No problem. Until you get concrete evidence. And when you have concrete evidence, you should name those people.

No problem. I don't have the concrete evidence. I find their inconsistencies. Why? But you have named other people. I'm trying to answer. You can't ask me questions. You can't ask you questions.

Let me finish it. Let me talk faster. I have communicated to them that their inconsistencies, make me uncomfortable. I have communicated to them that somebody else who was a third party gave me into information that I am not yet comfortable as I am betting it, giving it to the public because that's the responsibility to do. These are private citizens.

And that if I were in their shoes and had more access to information, I would go down that route. Okay. So do you believe Mikey McCoy had any prior knowledge of Charlie's murder? I can't say that he had prior knowledge of the murder unless I have something concrete. I can't say anything about prior knowledge. What I can say is what happened on that day. Mikey's behavior is weird on that day. I find it weird, like I said in the podcast yesterday,

that what has been communicated to the public is like he called Erica instantly, instantly. First thing you did was call in Erica instantly. And that's actually the call logs show that he didn't call Eric instantly. What are you suggesting about his wife instantly? And then he had three ways. It was a little longer later. Guilty.

Here's a problem. You have a massive. You have a massive platform, as you know. Millions and millions of people hang on your review word. When you devote. large part of an entire episode to the strange behavior of Charlie Kirk's chief of staff, you are putting a target on the guy's back. You're inferring here's something to do with this. Or something to do with some cover-up or whatever it is you're inferring. You know what you're

doing when you do that. When you saw Erica Kirk, did you say to her that you believe there's something suspicious about Michael McCoy? Was she able to explain to you why there isn't? or does she share your view that he is somehow complicit in this in some way? Well? Well, we actually dedicated more time to speaking about his father, who I think is, it's strange to me that that man called in South of the Pastor. Guys, if it doesn't make sense, then it's BS. That's all I'm saying.

I had never made that claim that Mikey McCoy planned Charlie Kirk's assassination. No, I think like a lot of the claims you're making is it's difficult to work out what you're actually claiming. You're throwing a lot of mud in the air, including people's names, which immediately then has millions of people chasing up. They're making money. On social media. I'm sorry they get caught lying. Like, I'm sorry. What is this?

This is like, the people, the public is actually being abused. Okay. Let's not pretending that the victim is Rob McCoy. No, the public is being abused because you're basically saying, stop noticing that people at Turning Point USA are lying. No, no. How dare? Can this and the public? No.

Yes, you are. How dear kids the public doesn't do it. When there's an empathic repudiation of what you're saying. If Mikey lies and Rob McCoy lies and Blake Neff lies and, yes, all of these people have lied on record after the assassination. And the public goes, hey, that's kind of a weird lie. You're like, how dare you put a target on their back by noticing that they're lying? I mean, what weird psychological operation is this? Don't lie.

Don't lie. Do you believe Erica Kirk has been lying about it? No, I have been explicit on my show when people were saying, why aren't you attacking Erica Kirk. I said, because Erica Kirk has not lied. If to the extent that she lies, I will call it out. And that is why I did call out when she lied. Okay. When she said, Charlie Kirk never received any text messages the night before saying that he was worried about that he was going to get murdered tomorrow. Okay. I instantly said, well, here we have it. That's a lie. He definitively did receive, send out text messages to both Dan Flood and Andrew Colba.

And we met in person, she clarified that, okay, yes, that's real. And we didn't know until you said it because he was using a different app and she was checking his eye messages. Well, she's a liar over that? Those aren't lies. It's not even suspicious. But she wants you to think it is. To me, if you lie, you're going to make an enemy of me.

Just don't lie. How about that basic requirement to say to people, don't lie about what happened on that day. Don't lie about what you did on that day. Because that's the first clue to investigators that that person should be looked at further. Again, this is common sense. Okay, let's move to something else, Blake Neff said.

He said, Candace has made other stranger allegations involving French paratroopers in maroon shirts, Egyptian Air Force planes flying out of Provo, Utah, a potential underground assassins traveling through unseen tunnels. At one point in November, she started wildly throwing suspicion on members of Utah Valley soccer team for wearing hoodies. I could go on. There's always something new coming up. None of it ever pans out because from a start, there's been nothing there. What do you say to that? I'm going to talk about soccer.

He's lying. And that's the reason why Blake Neff is a suspicious character. I mean, him saying that I pointed to a soccer UVU person is complete fiction. I never had discussed that person on my show. Somebody was asking for a clearer photo of the person on X. And I shared it. No suspicion. Never said this person anything to do with anything.

I never covered him as a suspect on my show of anything at all, didn't ask for more information on this person. That kid instantly responded and said, oh, those are our school colors. And that was it. And turning point tried to turn. into this is the bar you're a liar well then Tucker Carlson's a liar that your friend Trump he's a liar why did you always like him until now your husband's a liar telling you that those earrings look great on you that's a fact why are you saying she said that there was a military Egyptian plane on the ground that day there was then fact there were there were two

so why are you pretending that that's like a weird thing to notice and that is why people have been flagged about these planes to his other I've never allowed to answer a single question that you say in entirety before you move on to the next question. You can't just keep talking at infinitum. I'm allowed to ask you another question. No, it's called answering. You just read an entire statement of multiple points of place. It's called filibustering. I got to the second point and you're like, let me ask you a question. I want to ask you. Here's you already asked me a question. I'm trying to answer the question that you asked. No, I want to ask you a follow-up specifically about the Egyptian planes given you've now addressed it. You guys get this about the Egyptian planes?

So good. So good. I am going to be publishing the full document because there's not even just two planes, there's actually four planes. 17. And I have been flying in and I should be more thorough because I realize that the spreadsheet I'm tracking Erica Cook. Not that let's let me, can I just please without you cutting me off? Sure. Like answer one thing.

Okay. Thank you. These Egyptian planes, more broadly speaking, now that we have gone deeper onto the planes recognizing that the reaction to them is not normal. What we can say is that the Egyptian planes are tied to Israel. They've been flying in that of Israel with their transponder off for years. But regarding the Turning Point USA picture, more broadly speaking, Turning Point USA, faith.

Okay? Obviously, Erica has been involved in a lot of the church stuff. It's not specifically tracking just Erica. It's turning point faith events, broadly speaking. I gave that information as well. I told Justin Strife and Erica, I'm happy to give you this like color-coded spreadsheet. There's no question. There's a correlation here between Turning Point USA faith in particular,

which, by the way, from the beginning of this, I've said something is wrong with this faith contingent, especially because Rob McCoy for a while was heading up that department, and he makes the skin crawl. And so, yeah, I have the evidence for that. Evidence. And we're going to actually publish it on our website. So there can be no question, which I should have done from the very beginning.

Let me ask you. Showing that these planes were tracking Charlie, various times where Erica is, various times there where Rob McCoy is. But the consistent thread here is faith, faith events, like kingdom to the capital. You get it. Assuming you're right. You get it. I don't know.

What? What do you mean? Eric. You know, I asked about this, said on CBS, if you want to go through my flight log, go right ahead. It's very boring. You, Candice, say I was here on this date. I have a photo on my phone to prove I was actually in hospital having contractions.

So that's one thing. She's directly repudiated. But let's assume for a moment you're right. And that all these Egyptian planes were flying around tracking Charlie Codick and Turning Point, Faith and Erica Cogartner. Why? What is your theory? I don't know. I don't know.

What's your theory, though? You must have an idea. is that we should investigate everything strange that happened on that day so we can figure out what happened. Why isn't anybody talking about Israel when it comes to the Reiner family? But are you suggesting... Are you suggesting Egypt?

Why are we pretending that we don't know why we ask questions? Like, you're a journalist. You know what this is. You're like, what's going on? What's your theory? Why do you want to know why these planes were tracking Charlie? Well, my theory is that we are being sold absolute Fed slop.

The media is doing their Operation Mockingbird Part 2 scenario by telling us, well, unless you absolutely have a conclusion, you can't even ask the question. Yes, we very well, Dan, can't. Keep asking consistent questions until we get a clarified explanation for what happened on that day. And right now, we have nothing. Before the courts. And that is the reason why people are watching my show, because I'm the only one not treating them like their absolute idiots who don't have two eyes, who believe in magic bully theories and who understand that Egyptian planes should not have been tracking Charlie, even three times this year, would be an anomaly. Okay, they've been tracking him. We don't know where it's

going to end, but we are going to keep asking questions until we get clear answers. Candice, it may be that the person in the media spewing bullshit to the public is you. No, nice try. It's not. It's you by saying, why are you asking questions? Don't you worry about Mikey's feelings? Everyone knows what this is. And like I said, because we have the example, the concrete example of after JFK's assassination, the media members quite literally being put on the payroll of the CIA. We have a historical example. that we can look at and go, we're not doing that again. Doesn't matter how many times you keep telling the public that I'm spewing bullshit,

it is only because there has not been anything that has come out of this investigation that makes any sense that the public is not listening to, I am sorry to say this, Pierce, people like you. Pierce, right here, you're doing it for money. Listen. And people have, as you know, you've been widely attacked now by a lot of people who say that you're just a ghoul, a vulture. You're doing misdiliberately.

You're inventing things or just flying. Louispriscus gross to make money. I do think you are the wrong person to give an assessment, given like, you know, your history, celebrity. Can you not interrupt me? I do think it's pretty rich. It's pretty rich coming from you is all I'm going to say. That's me putting it very nicely given your background, your career.

And everybody knows that Charlie Clark was not shot by Tyler Robinson on a rooftop. I am sorry. Everybody knows that, guys. And that's probably why I don't get views on these videos. videos. I know that it was Robinson, the accused. For a fact, I'd sell my health. I'd bet my my house on it. Was she bet her everything that she had that he didn't do it? Of course not. Doing it for clicks. I don't know whether any of the things you're saying are true or not. I just do know you're saying a huge amount of stuff. It's making you very wealthy. You're getting

millions and millions of people coming in, which, by the way, what is this idea that's making me very well? Can you actually explain that slowly? Yes, I'm going to explain it to you slowly, because I had a huge run in, for example. This is just like a talking point. No, no, no. I'm explaining exactly what I mean. No, it makes sense. You're suggesting that I'm making money. Did I sign a new advertiser? Are we meeting more, are we reading more ads? Do we put this somewhere else? The more views you get on YouTube? The more money you make. Did I sell a T-shirt? Okay, but come on. Pierce, money on YouTube? Are you kidding me? I was already in a top 10. podcast globally before Charlie Cooper was assassinated.

Before he's assassinated, top 10, after he's assassinated, top number one. And if you think that I would want my friend to be assassinated so I could go from being in the top five to being number one, you're out of your mind. I'm telling you. I'm telling you. I'm telling you. It's not what he said. Nobody, everyone who is saying that I'm making more money cannot say how I'm making more money because it's just not true.

YouTube ads. You're like, oh, she got a bump in viewership talking about telling you all your YouTube numbers. Everyone in the world because it was a public. YouTube bats. with sponsorships. When the sponsors know that your videos are going to go through the roof, they will pay you more, a lot more. She has an increase of over 120% after his death on her YouTube.

Assassination. And then it went up in the weeks following and it went back to normal. Candice, are your YouTube numbers up since you've been doing the Charlie Kirk investigations? Answer it. What I am saying to you is that this is the exact same argument you guys had about Brigitte. So it can't, and then the same exact same argument you had. You were lying about Brigitte. You know that.

lively thing. Okay, but like, what about the big lively thing? So you can't keep saying that, oh, she's always in the top 10 because she's talking about something. Or I'm just, this is my podcast and it's me. It's just me. People enjoy my podcast because I don't treat them like they're idiots. I don't treat that. I have not sold a t-shirt, nothing with his name on it. Oh, yeah. Candace. You're losing money. She's losing money. The reason I told the Alex Jones story is, all right, which of your theories when you were with Erica did she think was convincing? We didn't, what, what do you mean by that? Well, did she think? that Israel was involved? Did she think that there were French paratroopers involved?

Did she think the Egyptian planes were complicit? Did she believe that Turning Point employees were involved? Which of the many theories you fly? Did she think is actually got any merit to it? I think you're characterizing it like I sat down and tried to convince her of my theories. That's not, that wasn't the nature of the meeting that we had. I shared information with her and told her, you know, what the feds were ignoring and these are the things I'm looking into. Obviously, explained to her about the Egyptian planes and this bizarre connection to, you know,

turning point faith events and tours. And, yeah, I mean, it was kind of like sharing the information with her. So there was nothing that... But again, here's my problem, Candace, with the whole thing, is it... Everything is like, you're just asking questions, you're sharing information, you're doing...

But when I actually ask you to be specific, about who do you think did what? That's where it all hits a shuddering halt. You don't know, do you? You don't actually know anything. Of course, if I actually knew who shot Charlie Kirk, I would be instantly publicizing it. I'd say, I figured it out.

I figured it out. That's not how an investigation works. Pierce just doesn't work. But she knows for a fact. It wasn't the accused. Like that, okay? You have to follow the clues until you arrive at the conclusion. Of course, I cannot confidently state that it was.

was, you know, John Smith who shot Charlie Kirk from the left side. I don't know that yet. I don't know that information yet. And when I do know it, I will publicize it without question. I just am pointing out the inconsistencies, the lies. He was not shot with 30 out six and did not have a man of steel net. And that's completely made up. Well, actually, that's going to be my show today. I do now factually know that that man of steel thing was made up and that never came from the surgeon's mouth. So again, we have another lie. We have another lie coming out of turning point. USA. Okay, pre the meeting with Erica, you repeatedly questioned why we weren't being told where Charlie Kirk is buried, or even if he has been buried yet. Did you get those answers? That's, you have the wrong commentator who questioned that. I think that was Milo,

Yanapolis. Oh, you didn't talk about that. You've never questioned, you've never asked where Charlie's buried? Nope, I just communicated to the people, that he had a Catholic funeral mass, which, because people were saying I was lying about him going to a Catholic church, which was another random attack that I had to endure. So I never said that people don't know where Charlie Kirk's buried. That's just the wrong commentary, wrong commentator. Do you know where he's being buried? I actually genuinely never got to that question with Erica, but I do know where he's...

I think the implication that Milo made, again, you'd have to ask him was that he's not buried. I do know where there is a spot for him to be buried or to be held in a mausoleum. But I never... That's just... Yeah, you have the wrong person on that. Erica was emphatic in the CBS thing that she wanted you to stop with the conspiracy theories. Maybe you've got it all right. All of this stuff is true and it's all involving the Israeli.

She says stop a bunch of times. Israelis and Egypt and Turning Point in a mass conspiracy with his young kid, Tyler Robinson brought in and they're all involved in this dramatic murder of Charlie Kerr. Maybe you're, let's just assume for a moment, you're 100% right. But she did tell you publicly before you met to stop. What's clear is you're not going to stop. So is she okay with you now continuing to talk about your theories or does she still want you to stop?

Well, she didn't ask me to stop. If that's the question that you're asking is throughout that meeting, did she say, can you stop? Obviously. So your response to that is what? I'm telling you that then we had a conversation and I was not asked throughout that conversation to stop. And to the contrary, I shared information that I had and I got information from them.

Right. That helps me to further focus. You will carry on with the theories. Until I feel confident of who killed Charlie Kirk, I will not stop investigating this. She has to say it in person, guys. Not over the phone in person. And Erica is okay with you doing that? I just, I don't know how many other ways to answer your question,

other than saying she did not ask me or request for me to stop in person. And we spoke about that moment, she felt that Barry Weiss was being Barry Weiss. And she made no request of you whatsoever, Erica Kirk, in four and a half hours. Request in what sense? About how she would like you to conduct yourself about the murder of her husband going forward? No. Nothing at all.

No, she didn't make a request for me to conduct myself in any way going forward. And she expressed no concern about any of the theories. I think she probably body language. I don't know if that would be a thing that she would have done. But no, she did not ask me to conduct myself in any way. That seems to just be coming from the media of how I should conduct myself. Am I right in thinking that your mind has taken you to a place

where you genuinely believe that Israel, Egypt, turning point employees. Her hairdresser. and Tyler Robinson and potentially others, but they were all involved in the murder of Charlie Kitt. Robinson's hairdresser. Well, to be fair, I think we're all putting Egypt in parentheses because we kind of don't think that we have exactly a strong Egyptian lobby here in the United States.

And there is a lot of historical precedent with all the other ones. Israel kind of using Egyptian planes or using the Egyptian narrative when they want to accomplish things. So, I mean, I just pointed out that this is an Egyptian plane. But Israel, I got tons of questions about, yeah. I think Israel is a very good place to start when BB Net and Yahoo is just denying and just way too involved in the beginning. That was weird. Everyone felt it was weird and they were right to feel that it was weird. What about Nova Scotia? And when BB admits that he called him two weeks before him by him to Israel, like what's that about? People are being, it also because it's the, it just happens to be that from the very beginning, Zionists don't want us investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination.

You can have to Google Zionist. Just I would say the usual suspects. You are correct that I have. have and sent information and has not been denied by the L.A. Palace, the White House, or the Pentagon, that the French Foreign Legion was on the ground that day. Again, something that I flagged to Turning Point USA as Justin Strife, that for whatever reason, the feds don't want this information. It's too long. It's strange or don't seem to be interested or maybe they're pretending to investigate and it. Yeah, but the French Foreign Legion is like a bandit of, you know. My guess, Candace, for what it's worth, is it'll turn out. None of that is true.

and that it was Tyler Robinson who for his own politically motivated reasons hence brandishing the bullet casings with words like anti-fascist slogans and so on that's why he did it that's right Pierce case closed

bye bye