Closing Bell - Closing Bell: 6/27/25
Episode Date: June 27, 2025From the open to the close, “Closing Bell” and “Closing Bell: Overtime” have you covered. From what’s driving market moves to how investors are reacting, Scott Wapner, Jon Fortt, Morgan B...rennan and Michael Santoli guide listeners through each trading session and bring to you some of the biggest names in business.
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Thanks so much. Welcome to Closing Bell. Scott Wabner live from Post9 here at the New York Stock Exchange on this very busy Friday.
Now this Maker-Baker begins with stocks hitting new highs but then take a look at that chart on the S&P 500.
A bit of a different story here on those trade headlines that Brian was just mentioning.
We'll have more on that in a moment and ask our experts over this final stretch including Ed Yardeni what all of it means he's going to join us in just a moment.
We'll show you the major averages here collectively across the board again a little bit of a different
story both the S&P and the NASDAQ did hit record levels earlier in the session.
It's a technology story but not just that industrials and financials have also been
around new highs today we'll track all of that individual stocks making news.
Nike certainly worth a mention today.
That stock is surging investors betting the worst now behind that company and
betting by 15% in the green today following the latest earnings report there.
We'll track it into the close does take us to our talk of the tape.
How high can this market really go when you still have those kinds of headlines
out there about trade,
about taxes, and about other things driving the market activity?
We'll ask our experts.
We do first want to go though to Megan Casella in Washington.
She has the very latest on those headlines, which have definitely impacted the market
over the last hour or so.
Megan.
Absolutely, Scott.
Potential now for the trade war to heat up again,
this time specifically with Canada.
The president posted just before about 2 p.m.
that because Canada is moving forward
with the digital services tax,
which will impact U.S. tech companies,
he says he will then be terminating all discussions
on trade with Canada effective immediately.
He goes on to say that he will be letting Canada know
the tariff that he will be letting Canada know the tariff
that they will be paying to do business with the U.S. within the next seven days. So more to come
on this front but really shaking up the U.S.'s relationship with its second largest trading partner.
And remember Scott, Canada does not face a July 9th deadline for reciprocal tariffs. It's currently
facing only the 25% tariff that's still in place over fentanyl concerns.
But all goods that are traded under the USMCA have been exempt from that tariff.
There are, though, still ongoing trade talks, especially over the sector-specific tariffs,
including on autos, on steel, and aluminum.
Canada has recently been threatening additional retaliation against all of those if a broader
deal wasn't reached soon.
So now, with this threat, the biggest questions from here are what the new
tariff against Canada will be, what it will cover, and whether Canada retaliates
since we already know they were threatening retaliation over what was in
place already.
And Scott, as you mentioned, we'll have Treasury Secretary Scott Vestent
joining CNBC in the next hour to discuss all of it.
Scott.
Always an important interview, Megan,
especially so now given this movement in the market
on those headlines you just brought us.
That's Megan Casella in Washington for us.
Now let's bring in Ed Yardeni.
He's the president of Yardeni Research.
Good to have you here.
Thank you, Scott.
Especially in this fast moving now market.
Well, this is a reminder of the risks that still remain.
What do you make of this?
Well, I think we're still very much in a bull market.
I think the weekend is upon us.
People are taking their profits
once we got to a record high this morning.
So I don't really think this is much to be concerned about.
I think the market's gonna go higher
because I think the economy
is gonna continue to prove resilient.
I mean, it has shown some weakness of late, but that's really old data.
It's data that's in response to all the uncertainties.
And I think a lot of the uncertainties have dissipated.
I mean, clearly trade isn't a done issue yet, but I think it will be by the end of the summer.
I mean, you're talking as if this headline never moved today,
that this is simply related to hitting a new high and nothing else.
I mean, the market would beg to differ.
Well, it just begs to differ one day.
That's okay.
I've been wrong on a daily basis.
You know what?
One of the reasons why we've been able to continue to move towards these new highs and
then ultimately reach it, we haven't had any trade headlines, right?
And here they are back in front of us again.
I would say that the correction that we had earlier this year
wasn't just all about trade.
It's also about, I remember DeepSeq back in January.
Do remember that.
And suddenly there was all this concern
that the tech companies were spending way too much money
on AI infrastructure.
And then they came out with their first quarter earnings,
which were great.
And they said they were gonna continue to spend
billions of dollars on the data centers.
And so we've got Nvidia at a record high just recently.
And so you put it all together and I think it's a,
it's a pretty solid economy, pretty solid stock market.
And you have no worries at all that whatever tariffs end up being in the end game of all
this, wreck what you say is a still good and resilient economy.
Because no, we can argue with the fact that the economy is pretty good and that it has
remained really resilient.
But there is that hanging out there.
Yeah, that's still hanging out there.
There's always a risk, clearly, in the market,
things to be concerned about.
Sometimes the market goes up best when everybody's worried.
And what's interesting is here we are,
basically at a record high in the market,
almost at a record high,
and a lot of the sentiment indicators
are still very wary, very cautious.
You're not seeing a lot of bullishness
in the sentiment indicators. So that's a good thing that suggests that people just
really haven't bought into this recovery from the correction. But if you look at
let's say you look at the momentum factor and the momentum ETFs that are
record high. Let's say you look at the high beta ETF, you know, lower quality,
higher risk names. Those have been flying high.
Isn't that a bit of a concern to you at all
of any sort of speculative nature behind this move?
Yeah, well look, I think the big concern here
is that it's as though the correction never happened, right?
We're right back, what, at the 21 forward PE
before the correction at the, before the correction, at the beginning
of the year we were at 22, so the valuation multiples have gone up. I think to me that's
an indication that there are a lot of investors that are coming around to my thinking that
the economy may be recession-proof. I know that's hanging out there with a concept,
but I've been hanging out with that concept
over the past three years when the Fed tightened,
the economy remained resilient.
And now the economy's remained resilient
with the tariff issue.
All right, so you're like John McEnroe over there.
You're just deftly volleying away anything
that I throw at you, no matter where I throw it.
I mean, you have no concerns?
Because it doesn't sound like you do,
other than the, oh, well, there's always something
to worry about, or oh, yeah,
there's still unresolved tariffs,
or oh, yeah, the tax bill still isn't done yet.
I mean, I could be wrong.
It's happened before.
I could be wrong about the economy.
I may be overstating the resilience of the economy.
It's certainly getting stress tested here, but I think it's already starting to show
signs that it's passing the Trump stress test.
And now, if I'm wrong about that, guess what?
I'll be wrong about the Fed, because I don't think the Fed has to do anything.
But the Fed could always save my forecast by lowering interest rates if necessary.
There's a lot of pressure building up on the Fed
to lower interest rates if things get any weaker.
But things aren't all that weak.
I mean, initial claims remain very low.
Continuing claims suggest-
A little bit elevated.
A little bit, continuing claims are elevated.
It's taking longer to get a job.
But the important thing is layoffs aren't occurring
and that's kind of the key to any business cycle.
But you have the safety, you just pointed the safety net the Fed put.
Yeah, exactly.
In a worst case scenario the Fed's going to come in and cut rates.
It's still there, yeah.
And not only that but we're probably going to get Trump's extension of his tax cuts or
maybe some additional tax cuts within that.
And the bond market seems to be okay with that at this point.
What about the dollar?
What do you think the message of the dollar is?
I'm not bearish on the dollar.
Everybody seems to be.
Well, everybody else is.
Everybody else is bearish on the dollar.
Scott, you know I have a little contrarian streak in me,
but I don't do just to be a contrarian.
I look at the US and I see the world's largest
capital markets.
I see that the bonds, the bond auctions are going
absolutely fine. Stock market, the bond auctions are going absolutely fine.
Stock market, the world's largest stock market.
So I am not bearish on the dollar.
But what's that about?
What's that chart telling us?
It's down 10% a year.
So we're starting to a year decade.
We're six months in decades.
If you're looking at the DXY, the DXY, I think most people think it's a trade-weighted index.
It's not.
It's a fixed-weight index.
The euro's about 57% of that.
So the euro's been very strong.
I think the euro's been strong because there's a perception and a hope that they're about
to enter a long period of deregulation of more fiscal excesses, which has worked for
us. Now we're kind of hoping it will stimulate their economies.
But I don't know about that.
I'm not quite sure that they're going to be able to deregulate us anywhere near what
we've done over the years.
I mean, the more that President Trump pounds on Fed Chair Powell, the dollar continues
to go lower.
You have any concerns whatsoever that if there is this so-called shadow Fed share appointed
much earlier than people think, which could undermine the credibility of the Fed, that
that's an issue for the markets?
Well, even if Trump had, let's say, Christopher Waller, who's a board governor, but he clearly has aspirations to replace Powell.
Even if he got Waller on there, there's still lots of other people on the FOMC and on the
board of governors that aren't necessarily going to go right along in lower interest
rates.
No, but you know, I mean, the Fed chair himself yields the, you know, if it's not an iron
fist, it's
short, darn close.
Yes and no.
I mean, I would argue we could have some real dissent at the board if in fact, Waller pushes
for what Trump is asking for.
All right.
We'll leave it there.
Ed, thanks for coming by here.
Thank you.
That's Ed Yardeni right here, Post Night.
We have a news alert now on the credit bureaus.
Diana Olek has the very latest for us.
Diana, what do we know here?
Well Scott, it was just a little under an hour ago that FHFA director Bill Pulte posted on X that he
was going to do a comprehensive review of the credit bureaus and that of course sent the stocks
of the bureaus like TransUnion, Equifax, Experience, Tanking. I reached out to Bill Pulte, who by the
way FHFA is housing, That's the Federal Housing Finance Authority.
And he actually said after the post in response to somebody else that it wasn't just housing.
He was looking at credit cards and car loans as well.
But he told me in following President Trump's executive orders to lower housing costs inconsistent
with the law, we are ensuring there is a truly competitive market with credit bureaus.
This includes not just the price, but also we want to ensure that the bureaus are acting as true competitors of each other, which was interesting. Then he followed
up and said, oh, one more thing. I'd encourage the companies to operate above board and not engage in
any improper collusion as we seek to help the American consumer. That was a little bit more of
a shot across the bow. We know he's been after the credit agencies because their prices have been higher.
He talked a lot about FICO in the past.
It's not really FICO.
That's the credit score.
And you can get that score for free.
It's that credit score that goes into those credit reports that when you're looking
to get a mortgage or a car loan, etc., you need to get your full credit report
and your full credit, you know, that to the mortgage lender.
And that's where prices have gone up slightly,
not incredibly, but they have gone up.
So this is all, I guess, part of trying to lower prices,
but it's probably gonna take a little more than that.
Back to you.
Okay, interesting news.
Diana, thanks for that.
That's Diana Olick down in D.C.
Let's get back to the market at large.
Tech seeing some serious strength today.
That sector hitting a new high, the NASDAQ as well.
Steve Kovac is here with more we know about
the mega caps but it's not just those stocks deep.
Yeah, it's it's a lot of tech and I'll echo what Ed was
saying just a few minutes ago Scott that it's like that deep
seek thing never really happened or at least a lot of
these AI names that sort of shrug it off you got lots of
MNA activity just optimism around the AI story and so much
more going on.
But not everyone is invited to the party.
I'll show you that in a second.
But look, we have NASDAQ hitting new records this week,
on pace to close this week up more than 3 percent.
Let me give you some highlights from the Mag 7.
You have Nvidia also hitting new highs,
following its annual shareholders meeting.
You had CEO Jensen Wong making
these huge promises regarding AI and even beyond that, robotics.
It's now on pace to close up more than 8% for the week.
Then you got Meta.
We have all these headlines over the last couple of weeks that it's on this huge artificial
intelligence hiring spree, spending enormous amounts of money.
Now it's up 25% for the year.
And then some of the lowlights out of the big tech names we got here Apple and Tesla still sitting out underperforming their peers for Apple it's the same thing we talk about all the time Scott still has the most exposure to tariffs and did not show off any major AI breakthroughs at WWDC it's down still nearly 20% on the year and then Tesla in a bit of a sales slump we saw the firing of that one VP yesterday and then the gains from the Robo taxi debut
earlier this week.
They pretty much got a race.
Tesla not as bad as it was earlier this year, but it's still down about 20% on the year.
Scott.
All right, Steve Kovac.
Thanks for that.
Let's bring in Evercore ISI's Mark Mahaney now for more on this big move in tech.
It's good to have you on this record setting day.
It's funny.
You have your top picks
of Alphabet, Amazon, and Uber.
We were just mentioning Meta there,
which has had a really great run here.
Why isn't that at the top of your list?
Because it just had a really great run.
I don't know, Scott, that.
I look for these DHQs,
these dislocated high quality companies,
and actually one of the Max seven stocks that's really under
performed here today is Google
it's still off eight eight
percent something like eighty
nine percent. They know here to
date and I think there's a
really interesting AI play that-
that is under appreciated
there's some major overhangs on
on Google related to the
government in the anti trust
case I get that and related to
chat GPT. I'm just struck by the
opportunity for that sentiment
to change it it does the risk
board on this is extremely
strong extremely positive and
then- Amazon would be a number
two pick- and then- Uber would
be a number three pick look I
like meta it's it's sort of
smaller by for me now twenty
five twenty six times earnings
I think that multiple spine it
is what there's a lot of
upside to the earnings so she's
the quality compound there you want real output in the earnings. I think that multiple is fine. I just want to get a lot of upside for the earnings. So it's just a quality compound there.
If you want real output in the portfolio,
I think Google's a better bet than that.
When you go to Google though,
some stocks underperform for a reason, right?
Your ifs, there are a lot of ifs there, right?
AI disruption, the DOJ, the lack of cost focus. How
much of that they have to get right so that your ifs aren't
too much of a worry. Yeah I know I laid out those three in a
recent report I actually think the company's done a better job
of managing expenses and I think actually they've got more credit
from investors for that so it's really the other two. I think
we're going to get a clearing event in August I mean I'm doing'm doing my best. We're doing our best to try to predict what Judge Meta is going to decide. And I don't think the worst case scenario is going to come to pass. The worst case scenario would be a forced sale of Chrome and then a banning on all search distribution payments. I don't think that's going to happen. If it doesn't happen, I think you've got a clearing event
for Google shares.
And then what Google then needs to do is prove
that they can monetize AI searches, GenAI searches,
AI overview searches, just as well as they can,
traditional searches.
They've been saying that publicly,
but they got to kind of show it in the numbers.
How do you do that?
You maintain this kind of 11 to 15% search revenue growth
that they've done for the last two
years you keep it up at the
same pace got and- I think the
bears are gonna come we lose
steam and you get a real chance
for a re rating here trading at
seventeen times earnings. I
mean you remove these two
overhangs this thing doesn't
stop at eighteen nineteen it
goes twenty twenty three twenty
five times or it's up where
that is. That's why the stock
I think the setup here so
attractive on. For Google here I That's why the stock, I think the setup here is so attractive for Google here.
I get the overhangs, but I think they could be removed
as early as a month from now in the case of the DOJ case.
Wow, I mean, I thought it was interesting
within the last week or so when Cotu management,
and I've referenced this a couple of times
on the various programs here,
excluded Google from its top 40 tech companies
when they're looking ahead to the next big things
for the next handful of years.
It left it off that list.
It was the only one of the biggies left off that list.
And here's one of the most astute technology investors
that we've known.
Did you notice that? And was that a statement of some sorts in your mind as well?
No, I have huge respect for Cotu.
I just, you know, I'll stick with my thesis on Google.
I think that the idea that they've been kind of left behind by J&E.I. is massively overstated.
I think they've been, you know, 10 years into AI and now it's the matter of getting that fire lit where it needed to get lit for Google and I think they've been you know 10 years in the AI and now is the matter of getting that
fire lit where it needed to get lit for Google and I think it has and I think they've been
accelerating their pace of product rollouts. As long as you can get search you can prove to people
that search is going to continue with that growth then you get these amplifier effects that are
really light on the stock. YouTube continues to gain share amongst all streaming assets. I think
Google Cloud is going to show acceleration
in the back half of the year.
And then you've got this wonderful option value
with Waymo that's going to get unlocked
and gets any sort of credit like Tesla does.
That just adds to the kind of the multiple rerating
potential for Google.
So that's my Google's thesis, Scott.
I'm going to stick with it.
I look to these DHQs, these dislocated high quality companies, Google's at the top of my list right now.
Yeah. Well, I mean, Amazon is too, right? I mean, it's your number one large cap long.
And they have their own huge AI aspirations with AWS, as we learned when we spoke to the
CEO exclusively a couple of weeks ago out in San Francisco. I mean, they don't want
to cede any any ground anybody. So yeah just like I
don't write Google's number one
pick Amazon's number two pick
for at first Amazon is going to
two overhangs on Amazon. Why
it's trading at twenty eight
times earnings versus cons like
Walmart that are trading ten
times. Ten terms higher in
terms of the multiple. You know
with the Amazon they got to
prove that they get to prove that they can get
through these tariff issues, and they may not be able to,
but I think they're just as well positioned,
and probably better positioned than any company out there,
maybe with the exception of Walmart, but those two,
I think their supply networks are sophisticated enough.
I think they've been diversifying away
from trouble markets for quite some time,
so I'm less worried about them on that side.
Bigger concern really is can AWS show this reacceleration
that investors wanna see?
Microsoft Azure has done a wonderful job
in the last six to 12 months,
showing that they're riding the JNI way.
AWS needs to show this too.
I think they'll be able to do that
in the back half of the year.
If I'm right on that,
you get a re-rating on Amazon, do well.
Had a big debate on halftime today
over the next six months,
which stock was gonna do better, Tesla or Uber?
Uber's in your universe, Tesla isn't,
and in the first six months of this year,
it's been no contest, obviously.
Uber is far outpaced, Tesla.
What happens if Tesla gets autonomous right?
Is that stock, what does that mean for Uber in the race for
autonomous? That would be a negative catalyst for Uber. What Uber needs, in order for Uber to work
from here, they need to get more Austins. They need to get more Atlantis. It's not just rolling
out with Waymo, although they've been pretty darn successful with the two rollouts, and that's
what's caused the unlock in stock here to date.
But if you get more of these rollouts with Waymo and you get other AED companies, there's
more than just, you know, it's not just Waymo's world and it's not just Tesla's world.
And by the way, of those two, Waymo is dramatically better in terms of what they've been able
to show in rollout so far.
But if you get Zeus in the market and then you get a couple of Chinese players,
not in the US, but in parts of the Middle East,
maybe in Europe.
And if you get more companies like Mobileye, Mobilewave,
if you get these companies out there showing
that you can get multiple AV vendors,
maybe not two or three, but maybe four, five or six,
that's better for Uber's economics,
better for it as a supply aggregator
because it is far and away the biggest demand
aggregate that's just on the
mobility part of the business
on the- on the- don't forget the
delivery side of the business
which is the world's- largest
delivery company. So I just
think that business is a lot
more insulated than- than people
fear and I think that we're
starting to remove these kind of
robo taxi roadkill overhangs. I
think there's a lot more room
for overstock I know it's up 50% here today date, but this thing trades at like 18, 19 times free cash flow. It should trade at 25 times free cash flow. They're growing their free cash flow 25 to 30%. I think as you get more of these Austins, you're going to see that rerating continue. So despite how much it's risen here today, I'll stick with Uber. It's our number three pick. All right, we'll leave it there.
Mark, thanks.
Good weekend to you.
We'll see you soon.
Now let's get to our panel.
JP Morgan's Mira Pandit and CNBC contributor,
Neuberger Berman, Shannon Secocia.
Great to have you both with us.
Mira, you first.
You heard Ed Yardeni as we talk about the market,
which has given back a lot of what it had earlier
on this trade headline that Megan brought us earlier.
He wasn't too concerned.
Ed wasn't, are you?
Look, we're seeing some of those market jitters come back
as soon as you see the first trade headline.
And the market environment has felt eerily
like the lead up to April 2nd.
Now I would not expect that in this lead up to July 8 or 9
that we're gonna see the same outcome this time again.
But we do wanna be a little bit cautious
that trade is not in the rear view.
It's still in front of us. But I would say, look, the path of least resistance for
this market is higher given the fact that fear is not an investment strategy. We know
that there will be impacts to tariffs to the economy and profits. And yet right now, the
economy and profits are still holding in months after the initial tariff announcements. And
so we do need to keep that in mind
that their strength has been there.
And when we think about where the risks lie,
we need to be balanced because right now
there are some downside risks, there are some upside risks
and we don't want to miss out on potential upside.
Shan, how do you see it given that, you know,
the market does look a little bit different
than it did earlier today.
And if nothing else, it's just a reminder of what's still out there.
Yeah and it seems like we always get these announcements on Friday doesn't it Scott?
So I think one of the challenges is that you know what we're really watching for and really
the tariff impact that's most notable is going to be that that bleed through to CPI, PPI
and CPI and we haven't seen that. But we have seen tariff revenue increasing.
I mean, it's up $60 billion over last year
in a year to date period.
And so you are going to see either companies
digesting some of that or spreading that out
or potentially passing that on to consumers.
And so over the course of the next couple of months,
we're gonna get those CPI numbers.
I think most notably though, Scott, everyone's really looking at what's happening with this
tax bill because there are aspects of that tax bill that are expected to be stimulative.
And so perhaps there's a little bit of look through some of this tariff noise today and
into the next week or so, and perhaps past that tariff deadline as we look to see what
the implementation of that tax bill is supposed to be and potentially catalyzing some more of that real deregulation that we were expecting
would be coming into play around this time.
I see earnings which are pretty soon kicked off with the banks in the next couple of weeks
or so.
Overall consensus expectations have remained high.
We're still at nine percent earnings growth for the year and that feels a little bit high.
I would have said a couple of weeks and months ago that that's way too high. We're still at 9% earnings growth for the year and that feels a little bit high. I would have said a couple of weeks and months ago that that's way too high. Now I think we're
probably in the realm of expecting mid single digits for the year. So perhaps expectations need
to come down a little bit, but not all that much. And it will be interesting to see the pass through
to the consumer, to the point about CPI, how much are companies absorbing this? How much are they
looking to pass things on?
That's my key question for earnings season.
And you see that reflected in a lot of the consumer names
right now, but there is some fear around demand.
And there is some fear around those upper income spenders
maybe perhaps not being able to post the same results
that they had.
You've seen some of the weaker consumer spending
and retail sales data.
So that's the area I'd like to focus on most
as we come into this earnings season.
Second to that is, is it another year
of Mag-7 outperformance when it comes to profits?
Because coming out of last earnings season,
you saw some upward revisions there,
whereas you saw some downward revisions
to the rest of the market.
So is that an area that does end up carrying us again?
Shanna, what about what Ed was talking about,
all else fails, You got the Fed.
You still have the Fed put.
And if things go wrong, the Fed's going to come in and cut rates, and that's going to
be a positive no matter what anyway.
Right.
And I think you have a number of different areas of the market that would potentially
benefit from that.
Now, the challenge always is that if you're looking at the Fed,
no, not necessarily, because if you're looking for the Fed to come in and save
the day, they're coming in and saving the day because of economic deterioration.
This Fed is loath to act too quickly and so they would only act and they would
only act aggressively doing more than probably more than three three
cuts if they felt that there was a an issue with the the labor market.
So I think that there is a put in place.
However, I do think there would be some offsets to the enthusiasm around rate cuts because
it would indicate that some of this demand has truly been destructed and that we're seeing
that flow through to the labor market. Yeah. But I mean, almost
anytime the Fed theoretically
comes in to cut rates, it's
because of some reason behind
it. They don't say don't
fight the Fed for no reason.
I mean, in 08, I'm not
equating this to then, but
08, 09, they cut rates.
Market went up.
COVID, they cut rates.
The market went up. COVID, they cut rates, market went up.
They're cutting rates now.
People think that, why fight it now?
Well, I think that the Fed also would acknowledge, Scott,
that they might be just a bit too restrictive right now.
So we're in a little bit of a different dynamic
because the Fed already started to cut rates,
and then they got a bit skittish based on tariffs,
and then they pulled back. And so and so again we're at a little bit
of a different inflection point. I think again though I think if you're looking
at the Fed to catalyze additional gains in the equity market we're probably
going to need a little bit more than that based on where we are from a
valuation perspective and based on the expectation that growth is going to
continue to accelerate. How do you see that, Mira?
I mean, is the Fed coming in just an unequivocal positive or is it more nuanced than that?
Two cuts might be bullish.
Anything more than that might be bearish because again, if they're seeing some weakness in
the labor market that forces them to cut more than they originally anticipated, that's going
to signal something negative to the markets, especially because what they've been saying
essentially since December is two cuts this year and yet those individual dots of the individual participants have migrated
higher. So all of a sudden to do a round turn relative to their expectations might have the
markets a little bit nervous. Yeah I wouldn't disagree with that. I wasn't even thinking about
more than two. Let's just get to two and see what happens. Mira, thanks. Shannon, thanks. Good weekend
to you both and we'll see you soon. We're just getting started here. Up next, Momentum names helping move the market higher.
We talked about the MTUM hitting a record high today.
We'll talk about the names within it that are driving the action.
We're live at the New York Stock Exchange.
You're watching Closing Bell on CNBC. All right, welcome back.
Momentum, that factor and those names getting a big boost today.
Pippa Stevens is here with more.
Pippa, tell us.
That's right, Scott.
So Momentum stocks are powering the market higher with the MTUM hitting a new record
today. It's now up 17% on the quarter tracking with the MTUM hitting a new record today.
It's now up 17% on the quarter tracking for its sixth positive quarter in the last seven.
Now, since the April low, Robinhood and Roblox have been the top performers with shares doubling
NRG, Vistra and GE, Vrnova rounding out the top five.
And those power stocks are in the green again today with President Trump reportedly planning
executive orders to boost energy supply to power artificial intelligence, that's according
to Reuters, which said that the orders would include making it easier for power generation
to connect to the grid.
Now, that is a major bottleneck for the industry with some grid operators having a years-long
backup for new projects to enter operation.
Now, GE, Renault, and NRG both hitting record highs today and then grid infrastructure names like
Schneider Electric, ABB, Hitachi, Siemens and Eaton are also all in the green.
Scott?
Yeah, one of the big themes of this year.
Pippa, thank you.
Pippa Stevens up next.
314's Warren Pies.
He breaks out his second half playbook for us.
Where he sees stocks heading now from here.
He'll tell us next.
Welcome back with stocks at record highs. What is the best way to play the
markets into the second half? Let's ask 314 Research's Warren Pies. It's good to
see you. What's the first thing that's Warren Pies. It's good to see you.
What's the first thing that comes to your mind?
I mean, I feel like the market doesn't have a care
in the world until it does,
but today even with a little bit of a pullback
off of a trade headline from the White House
doesn't seem to be doing all that much.
Yeah, thanks for having me.
I mean, it's easy to say that on a day like this,
but you know, we've built quite a wall of worry, I think. So we've been telling our
clients to stay bullish. You know, we look out at the second half and I think the first
half was really defined by a bunch of events. And you know, one week we're thinking about
tariffs and next week we're thinking about going to war with Iran potentially. And it's
really, I think, created
this wall of worry, all these events.
But when we zoom out and look at the market and ask ourselves, where have we come from
the beginning here?
We've basically consolidated.
When you take all that stuff away for a minute, earnings, forward earnings are at an all-time
high, which is unequivocally positive for the market.
And what we've had is a sentiment reset.
So we came into the year with the 6,800 target
on the S&P 500.
Our big concern was sentiment.
We thought we needed a 10% correction in the first half
to reset sentiment.
And we see that now.
Strategists have dialed down their targets.
And I think we're clear sailing at least
as much as you can be in these markets
for the second half.
Are better earnings than expected?
Is that what at the end of the day
will define the second half in the market?
And in some respects it has to, correct?
Yeah, I mean, I think that's a bet, right?
We've brought estimates down a bit.
I think there's some concern around tariffs
and how those tariffs flow into earnings.
And I think it's actually given us, oddly enough, kind of a lower bar
for the S&P to jump over. So yeah, I think earnings should be okay. I mean, our concern,
our biggest risk, and we listed all the risks in our H2 outlook for clients is really the
economy, which obviously indirectly is going to, you're not going to grow earnings if the
economy falls into recession. And so that's where we're focusing most of our attention, but for
now I think we're in the same kind of muddled through soft landing environment
and I think S&P earnings are gonna surprise the upside. So what does the
playbook look like then if we believe what you say and it actually comes to
fruition? Where do I get the most out of that? Yeah I mean I think we're gonna
stick with high quality stocks. So one of the things that we've noticed, if you're going to pick nits in the market right now,
breadth is kind of weak. So we've got the market at an all time high, the median stock
within the market is still like 13% off a 52 week high. We did a bunch of analysis on
that. That's odd historically, but what we found is that that's really happened a number
of times in this bull market because we have this mega cap led bull market. So if we're going to advance to this like another 10% in the
second half or something like that, you've got to get participation outside of just this very
narrow mega cap world. Now I don't think, I'm not talking small caps or mid caps, I'm just saying
within the S&P 500. So I like high quality still, I think we're going to broaden out a little bit. Still
going to be mega cap led. I do think oil is going to be weak in the second half. That should be a
tailwind in the market, but we want to stay away from some cyclical commodity bruising stocks.
And I think bonds are going to be okay. I think that the consensus was so concerned about bonds
coming into the year, and this is something you and I have talked about over the months.
And our view is that rates were going to fall.
I think that's a nice mix for assets in general.
Don't go crazy getting low on the quality spectrum, though.
It's interesting because people are doing just that.
Whether it's you or others who consistently come on the network and say, high quality,
stick to the better, the
biggest. If you look at the high beta stocks, the high beta ETF for example, and
lower quality names, they're doing incredibly well. What's the message or
the risk in that? Well a part of that is normal off of a market low. You know beta
is like the number one factor when you make, and we put in a pretty significant low. When we look back at this, it was a fast rebound,
but we were down almost 20%, basically a bear market. So traditionally, as much as it feels
weird, traditionally, this is what you would expect to see high beta lead. I think the
next stage of the bull market kind of by definition has to broaden away from that group though.
And so if you ask me how to rotate your portfolio I think some of these underperforming quality
names that have been kind of forgotten about in this crazy speculative run that's where
we're going to get the most bang for our buck.
The best risk adjusted second half return.
Because some say it's classic late cycle FOMO moment when you see that performance from lower quality
higher beta. Yeah I mean to me I would push back against that a little bit.
When we study cycles and factor performance actually low quality leads
off market lows and we had a market low. I think this is part of that wall of
worries that you have a pretty big consensus that doesn't recognize the
event that we just went through.
We went through a real important clearing event where we came in over optimistic.
Maybe some of the, I think more of what we saw around the peak in November where we had
small caps, people were trying to buy small caps and stuff like that after the election.
That looked like toppy behavior to me.
And now what we've had is a washout and no one wants to believe what's happening.
But in fact, I think this high beta leadership is a little bit like what you'd see off of a major market low.
And so that tells me that we're still as crazy as it sounds like maybe in mid innings for this ongoing bull market.
Wow. All right.
We'll leave it there.
Warren. Thanks. We'll see you soon.
Warren Pies coming up next.
We track the biggest movers into this Friday.
Close Kate Rogers standing by with that
Hi, Kate. I got one group of stock sitting out today's rally and a retailer upgraded after a turnaround this year
We'll have more after the break Well, that's the 15 from the bell back to Kate Rogers now for the stocks that she's
watching.
Tell us what you see
Hi again Scott's so crypto stocks have been a laggard in today's rally Coinbase The worst performer on the S&P today after Bitcoin also fell today trading platforms Robin Hood and eToro will also lower
Micro strategy though bucking that trend the Bitcoin proxy slightly higher on the day
crypto stocks are still largely higher for the month and
slightly higher on the day, crypto stocks are still largely higher for the month. And meantime, SA Lauder is moving higher after HSBC upgraded it to buy from hold and increased
its price target to 99 from 80.
HSBC, seeing earnings per share doubling by June of 2027, citing cost-cutting efforts,
they also cited a weaker dollar as benefiting the company because it exports some of its
products from the US.
Shares have struggled over the last year though, down around 28 percent, but they are off their
recent bottom.
HSBC says that rebound seems quote, credible.
Scott, back over to you.
Kate, Rogers, thank you very much.
Coming up, one firm turning cautious on Uber and Lyft.
We'll tell you who and why.
Plus don't miss an exclusive interview with Amazon CEO Andy Jassy.
That is Monday.
It is six o'clock Eastern time.
It is all mad money.
We are back on the bell right after this.
We're the closing bell market zone CNBC senior markets commentator Mike Santoli is here to
break down the crucial moments of the trading day.
Plus Gabrielle Fanrouge on the surge in Nike shares today and Kanakord turning cautious
on Uber and Lyft.
Deirdre Bost is going to bring us those details but Mike so we're following trade headlines.
We have the Treasury Secretary coming up and maybe the markets following both of those
things because we're still above closing record highs for both the NASDAQ and the S&P 500.
We are, just a real intraday shakeout from those headlines
about maybe re-escalation on the China trade story,
which I don't know that it changes the overall
atmospherics of what's going on with the market
making a run at these highs.
What it does suggest though, as we've been saying
for a while is, we've gone from pricing
in worst case scenario 10, 11 weeks ago to now pricing in generally better conditions,
which are substantiated by the fundamentals for the most part, but also assuming some
further progress on trade.
That's not going to be the thing that starts to reescalate.
You don't want to have the sense out there that the market has kind of gotten so far
away from the perceived
Trump put on trade that it's vulnerable.
But right now it looks like it's going to confirm finally this this new high four months
after the fact.
I'll come right back to you looking at Nike there on the right side of your screen.
Better better than 15 percent.
Gabrielle what's happening here?
Yeah.
Shares of Nike are soaring today after reported better than feared Q4 results.
Even though sales were down, investors got the clarity they were looking for from CEO
Elliot Hill.
On a call with Analyst, he assured investors that the largest financial impact from its
turnaround plan is now in the rearview mirror.
He said declines in both profits and sales will now start to moderate.
He also shared promising details about new product launches and its move back into wholesalers. Now this is definitely a turning point for Nike
but don't call it a comeback just yet. Sales and profits will still be down
through the first half of fiscal 2026 and it's unclear when Nike can get back
to growth. When asked about it on the call, Hill didn't share a timeline. He
said the company is gonna take it 90 days at a time and it believes a full
recovery will take time guys
All right still a prove it story Gabrielle. Thank you. How about uber and lift D? What is can accord saying today?
Well, they're under pressure today after a downgrade from can accord as you alluded to the firm cut its rating on the stocks
Both stocks to hold warning that the rise of rootaxis could rapidly erode their business models.
Tesla's software for strategy, they say could drive ride costs below a dollar a mile compared
to what Uber and Lyft are getting right now, which is $3 plus.
And Scott, here's a twist that brings me back to the mid 2010s.
Uber has reportedly in talks with its former CEO, Travis Kalanick, to help him fund a new
autonomous vehicle deal. That is the same Kalanick over at Uber 1.0, who said
robo taxis were existential to its future.
And of course, it was ousted back in 2017.
Deep, thank you, dear, to both on those two stocks today.
You know, what's interesting too, Mike, is that this has been both a high quality
and in some respects, a low quality move to new highs.
What do you make of that?
It's fascinating.
I mean, there has been this sort of parallel tracks.
The market has traveled for a while.
It was also the case in the fourth quarter.
One of the issues is high quality in this current market,
the way this index is constructed,
has tremendous overlap with the hottest technology themes
that you'd want to play.
So yeah, Nvidia's high quality, it's
got 50% profit margins, okay? It has massive free cash flow and therefore it
qualifies in that regard, but it's still adjacent to all those stocks that are
just running because they're part of having high leverage to those trades.
Also, because of the speed of the comeback off the low, you know, I heard
what Warren Paatt was saying,
well you do generally have this sort of pendulum effect
of the stuff that was lowest quality, beaten down,
the most leverage, does snap back the most.
So I think that you can go along that way
for a little while.
It hasn't really penalized an investor
to stay with high quality for a while.
A lot of times in an exuberant market,
it feels like you can fall behind
if you are owning just quality,
but it's not the same as defensive.
It's not the same as low volatility necessarily either.
So all of these distinctions are out there.
And it's fascinating, we're gonna close at the high, right?
So we're above 61.70, we're less than a percent
from where we were at the peak in February.
Since then, earnings are higher, oil, dollar, and yields are lower,
and you're closer to a Fed rate cut than you were then, whenever we eventually get one.
So all of that bundled together suggests that the market has, you know, a decent base on it in terms of why we're here.
The question from here on out is, are second quarter earnings estimates too low at 5% annual
growth. Probably. And will the
market reward that obviously
everything else in the mix in
terms of trade re escalation or
deals or whatever we're going to
have I think could create an
excuse for the market to cool
off and back off because we are
getting overbought again. Yeah.
A week away from the 4th of July
holiday obviously whether they get the tax bill to the finish line before again. Yeah, a week away from the 4th of July holiday, obviously,
whether they get the tax bill to the finish line before that.
There is a lot of questions about that.
The seasonal factors, July in general has been positive,
especially for the NASDAQ.
But we also just had an unusually strong April and May.
So who knows if that's been pulled forward
or if you can count on that.
Didn't we just have like the last 10 July's have been positive?
Yeah, they've been up.
Jeff DeGrap was pointing to that.
Although mid-July last year was a bit of a peak, so keep an eye on it.
Alright, new closing highs for the SNC 500 and the NASDAQ.
That kind of record-setting day here.
And that's how the bell takes you into the weekend.
The Treasury Secretary coming up in overtime.
