ColdFusion - How General Motors Killed the First Modern Electric Car
Episode Date: April 17, 2026About ColdFusion ColdFusion is an Australian based online media company independently run by Dagogo Altraide since 2009. Topics cover anything in science, technology, history and business in a calm a...nd relaxed environment. » ColdFusion Discord: https://discord.gg/coldfusion » Twitter | @ColdFusion_TV » Instagram | coldfusiontv » Facebook | https://www.facebook.com/ColdFusioncollective » Podcast I Co-host: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6jKUaNXSnuW52CxexLcOJg » Podcast Version of Videos: https://open.spotify.com/show/3dj6YGjgK3eA4Ti6G2Il8H https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/coldfusion/id1467404358 ColdFusion Music Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGkpFfEMF0eMJlh9xXj2lMw ColdFusion Merch: INTERNATIONAL: https://store.coldfusioncollective.com/ AUSTRALIA: https://shop.coldfusioncollective.com/ If you enjoy my content, please consider subscribing! I'm also on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ColdFusion_TV Bitcoin address: 13SjyCXPB9o3iN4LitYQ2wYKeqYTShPub8 --- "New Thinking" written by Dagogo Altraide --- This book was rated the 9th best technology history book by book authority. In the book you’ll learn the stories of those who invented the things we use everyday and how it all fits together to form our modern world. Get the book on Amazon: http://bit.ly/NewThinkingbook Get the book on Google Play: http://bit.ly/NewThinkingGooglePlay https://newthinkingbook.squarespace.com/about/ Sources: **coming soon** My Music Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGkpFfEMF0eMJlh9xXj2lMw //Soundtrack// last track: Burn Water - Chosen **coming soon** » Music I produce | http://burnwater.bandcamp.com or » http://www.soundcloud.com/burnwater » https://www.patreon.com/ColdFusion_TV » Collection of music used in videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YOrJJKW31OA Producer: Dagogo Altraide Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Hi, welcome to another episode of Cold Fusion.
Today, electric vehicles have become a common site on roads around the world.
Although EVs are still financially out of reach for most households,
budget options by major manufacturers are beginning to appear at dealerships.
There's no doubt that the 2020s are going to be the decade that they go mainstream.
In fact, over 50 countries have banned the sale of new petrol-fueled cars in the coming decades.
With that being said, there's a lesser-est-end country.
known story here, a fascinating hidden history. What many don't realize is that the electric
vehicle revolution has been attempted before, and it almost happened. In the mid-1990s, General Motors
released what is widely considered the first true commercial electric car, the EV-1. The EV-1 was a critical
and commercial success, a shining example of what an electric car could be, but suddenly, this
industry-altering product mysteriously disappeared from
the market. The customers were happy and wanted to keep their cars, but General Motors took
all the EV-1s and shipped them off into the desert to be crushed. So what on earth happened?
Let's explore this twisting and bizarre story of the first modern EV and what stopped the
electric revolution before it had a chance to properly begin. It's hard to believe, but there was
a long time ago when EVs dominated city streets. Astonishingly, electric-powered wagons predated
gasoline-powered cars. The first of these came in 1884. It was a patent by Thomas Parker.
Although it was a great start, it was more of a hybrid steam-powered car than a truly electric one.
But in 1888, German innovator Andreas Flocken manufactured what historians regard as the first
true EV. Not long after, Carl Benz invented the motor wagon, which was the basis for the automotive
industry of the next century. But even with the competition of gas-powered options, the public still
preferred electric. Why? Because they ran smoothly and they were quiet. Meanwhile, gas-powered vehicles
were loud, produced smoke and needed a lot of muscle to start because you had to use a hand crank.
In 1894, the first American EV company was founded, Morris and Salam electric carriage and wagon
company, and by 1897, electric taxis had hit the street and the floodgates were open.
The industry was flooded with EV innovation over the next 10 years.
There was a 12-seater electric carriage that could travel up to 20 miles per hour,
and another electric car could do 25 miles on a single charge.
How about a massive 5-ton electric truck?
It was manufactured by Baker,
a company with 17 different other electric models in its lineup by 1907.
The 1910s brought style and class to the EV industry,
with a large number of upper-class models being released.
For a time, electric vehicles ruled the roads.
It looked like the next century would be filled with clean, whisper-quiet transport.
But it wasn't to last.
In the mid-1910s, things began to change.
The invention of the muffler and electric starter reduced the petrol cars engine noise
and need for a hand-crank, respectively.
Road infrastructure was also improving, eventually requiring vehicles to travel at higher speeds.
There was also a decade of massive crude oil deposit discoveries globally,
pushing petrol prices down and reducing operating costs for gasoline-powered vehicles.
At this point, EVs just couldn't keep up.
The EV industry basically went silent.
There was a small revival in the 60s and 70s when environmental concerns were front of mind,
but there wasn't anything of real note until the 1990s.
In the early 1990s, the Los Angeles city population had reached 3.5 million people.
Collectively, this population owned an incredible amount of cars.
Subsequently, pollution had risen to dangerous levels.
Pollution was measured to be higher in LA than all other states combined.
This was a massive public health issue, so state politicians and environmental departments
started directing their attention at the millions of gas-guzzling vehicles on the roads.
Policymakers pushed for lower emission, clean-burning vehicles, which some car manufacturers
were happy to explore.
It would only be a matter of time before California became the front line for the 1990s.
electric car revolution.
Chrysler entered the market with the TE van.
It could carry five passengers with a top speed of 70 miles per hour.
However, this wasn't enough to impress consumers, and they only produced 56 examples due to the low interest.
Another company, Serbring Vanguard, released the Kuwait, a two-seater miniccar.
And another early 90s EV company, called Soul Electrica, released the Soul Electrica Force,
a converted Suzuki Coulthus.
There was a lot of activity going on.
and it must have been exciting to see such rapid innovation back then,
much like as happening today in the EV market.
The most integral car of the time was produced by General Motors.
It was called The Impact, and it was unveiled at the 1990 LA Auto Show.
It was a sleek, modern-looking electric vehicle
that could reach impressive speeds of 180 miles per hour.
The impact was built off the back of the Sunracer concept car,
which gained attention after winning the 1987 World Solar Challenge,
a trans-Australia race for solar-powered vehicles.
Although GM had intended to produce 5,000 commercially viable cars,
the impact never made it to showroom floors,
but it did pave the way for the first real contender for the mainstream EV market.
Hello, I'm Bob Purcell, Executive Director of General Motors Advanced Technology Vehicles.
I am excited to have this opportunity to welcome you to be part of the team
that is about to make automotive history.
In 1996, General Motors built upon the lessons learnt from the impact to produce the EV-1.
Electric car is here.
Powered by lead acid batteries and boasting a range of 70 to 100 miles, there were 660 cars made in a trial run.
The arrangement was to lease them to the public, but with a specific clause that disallowed the option from ever owning the car outright.
This strange arrangement was a foreshadowing of what was to come.
Today is the first day GM's electric vehicle will be made available for lease to the general public on the West Coast.
Celebrations are being held today at Saturn retailers in Los Angeles, San Diego, Phoenix, and Tucson where the EV-1s are in stock.
But this car isn't for everyone.
In fact, GM expects that most of its customers will earn over $150,000 a year and not mind paying up to $650 a month to lease a car that is kinder to the environment.
The General Motors EV1 was a massive hit.
It was praised for its speed, high-tech accessories, and received the level of hype that would only be later seen by Tesla.
It was all looking good for electric vehicles, and General Motors, a trusted brand in the industry, was on board.
Momentum was building.
Well, it's actually very quiet, very refined, very quick and very drivable.
In essence, a jolly good little car.
Make no mistake, the days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered.
It wasn't long before GM's work in the EV space caught the attention of the California Air Resources Board,
who were still concerned about pollution levels.
The board saw advancements being made as an opportunity to push for more significant emission reductions.
A mandate was passed by legislators.
It stipulated that if automakers wanted to sell their cars in California,
a percentage of the vehicles needed to produce zero emissions.
The number of these zero emission vehicles would start at 2% and would rise yearly until petrol-fueled cars were completely phased out.
Initially, manufacturers were eager to comply with the mandates, as they saw the success of GM's EV1.
Thus, more and more EVs appeared on the market.
Most brands, such as Toyota, opted to convert their existing models into electric, for example, releasing the RAV-4 EV.
Honda unveiled its EV-plus model, Nissan started selling the online.
started selling the Ultra EV, and Chevrolet put out the S-10 electric pickup, which Ford responded
to with their Ranger EV. Although the manufacturer and the sales of these models were limited,
there was a notable shift in how the media and public spoke about EVs.
I never thought I'd really get excited about a car, because I usually only just care about
mileage and things, and does it pollute and that kind of thing. But this one, I got to admit,
I bought it originally because of the environmental considerations, and now I'm really excited
about it because it's a great car. It's fun.
Of course, there was still much skepticism, as is always the case with impending large-scale
change. There was a lack of faith in their towing capacity, fears of depending on unknown
technology, and the uncertainty over the ability of charging stations. Some of the same
conversations are going on today.
EV1 is aimed at a very small and select audience of techies and environmentalists who want
no more from their cars but a 100-mile range between charges, but they do want to make a statement.
GM is to be commended for being the first on the block, but surely the EV-1 is not yet ready for mass consumption.
This growing skepticism led to a backlash against the shift and the Californian government faced pressures to remove the mandate.
A protest movement grew with consumer groups like the Californians against utility company abuse forming.
These groups, backed by local businesses, lobbied against the mandate and against the installation of charging stations claiming it was a waste of taxpayer dollars.
this caught the attention of EV enthusiasts. For them, something smelt fishy. Why would anyone
vehemently oppose such minor issues such as charging stations? An investigation would soon be launched.
It didn't take long to discover that these anti-EV groups were not grassroots movements by concerned
citizens. There were well-organized, intentional campaigns backed by the oil and automotive industry.
It didn't stop at local council meetings either. Major oil companies like
Mobile took out ads in significant newspaper publications, contesting the effectiveness of
EVs in an environmental sense.
Arguments were made that the environmental cost of electricity through coal plans was more
significant than the straightforward burning of petrol and that EVs were just heavy polluters
only with more steps.
While the specific arguments that they made were eventually debunked, the damage had already
been done.
Auto manufacturers began to get nervous and they joined the pushback.
The California phase-out mandates were,
were now opposed not just by oil companies but the car manufacturers themselves,
and now the California authorities were forced to negotiate terms with the automakers.
An agreement was made and the mandate was altered. A change was implemented that stated that car
manufacturers were only required to produce EVs based on customer demand. It was now up to the
automakers to build the large numbers of EVs that the public were calling for or persuade them against
them. Those within General Motors Electric Division claimed to have spent more than one billion
billion dollars on marketing the EV-1 over the four years between 1996 and 2000.
It built a solid portfolio of interest among the public, but GM executives claimed that the numbers
were never high enough. It was later uncovered that there was an extensive waiting list,
about 4,000 people long, but it's alleged that internally, General Motors was doing everything
in their power to dissuade the public from signing onto an EV. By the time their convincing was done,
only 50 people on the waiting list remained.
These numbers, however doctored they may have been, were enough to prove to the Californian authorities that there had been relatively little interest in EVs in California.
In 2001, General Motors shut down the EV-1 assembly line and let go of all the staff on the EV-T team.
Other companies followed, with many Asian manufacturers like Toyota, focusing on hybrid technology instead.
US companies took things a step further, filing legal action against the state of California over the mandate.
In October of 2001, newly appointed President George W. Bush officially backed the automotive industry in the fight to remove California's EV mandate.
President Bush supported the removal of all mandates, as did his chief of staff, Andrew H. Carr Jr.
It should be recognised that Mr. Carr Jr. was once the chief lobbyist for GM and led the Auto Industry Trade Association in opposing the mandates when they first came into effect.
Unfortunately, under the weight of lobbying manufacturers, the industry.
history leaders and politicians.
California buckled.
And in April of 2003, California's revolutionary electric car mandate,
designed to reduce pollution and improve the health of citizens, was dissolved.
This was the final nail in the coffin for the EV-1.
There was no hope of a return.
Environmentally friendly car is fueling a passionate debate.
General Motors wants to take the EV-1 out of commission,
but some very dedicated drivers are resisting.
are resisting.
We have a little term for driving an EV-1.
It's called Rocket Ride.
And we are not going to just stand here.
We're going to keep demanding that they build these cars again.
Anybody else feel that way?
They're perfectly functional cars that are being taken off the road.
Every single person who's driven the car wants one.
I can't even tell you the price of gas.
I don't know what the gallon of gas.
I can care less. It doesn't affect me.
Protests were held across California,
and the EV-1 owners even organized a mock funeral to protest the decision.
It was all to no avail in one of the strangest choices ever made by an automaker.
When the EV-1 leases ended, the company refused to renew the agreements and rejected offers for the customers to buy their cars outright, despite this being what the customers wanted.
GM would inevitably reclaim their vehicles, and this was thought to be the end of the story.
It was later discovered that nearly all the EV-1s produced were reclaimed by GM, shipped out of state and destroyed in the desert.
EV enthusiasts and previous leaseholders even raised enough money to purchase every existing EV1 from GM, but the company denied the offer.
Honda and Toyota followed in GM's footsteps, destroying large amounts of fully functioning relatively new in-demand EVs.
Cars that could have been the early stepping stones for the future of the automotive industry were now being shredded and destined for landfill.
Once again, the EV dream was over.
The biggest question still remained, why was this happening?
Why did a manufacturer, like General Motors, who had spent nearly a decade and over a billion dollars working towards an electric revolution, turn against the cause?
Well, one explanation is that General Motors never believed that the EV would be a profitable venture, and planned for it to fail in the beginning.
They only went along because of the mandates.
What's alleged is that despite the public demand, the automakers ran the numbers, and they saw long-term-term,
profit losses that came with EVs, and this is particularly compared to combustion engines.
Regular cars require expensive maintenance and parts replacements.
Servicing and repairs account for a large percentage of profits for car manufacturers.
When they saw that EVs require very little ongoing maintenance, they saw this as a threat to their
profits.
If you say, how about an electric car, you know, it's a totally different game.
What, there's less maintenance on electric car?
There's almost no maintenance because there's no internal combustion engine.
So there's no carburetor, there's no tune-ups, there's no air filters to change, there's not even a transmission.
So the electric car really challenges the whole fundamental business structure for the car companies.
And unfortunately, the electric car has another problem.
It doesn't use any oil.
So the electric car instantly goes after two bedrock industries in the country, and that makes it a very difficult cell.
This self-sabotage within GM has now become apparent and dates back to the country.
to the beginning of the saga. Remember the impact, that electric concept car that could travel
180 miles per hour? Well GM ran a program that they called Preview, which saw the company lend
50 of these EVs to hand-picked drivers for a period of one or two weeks. The drivers would then log
their experience. The program supervisor, Sean McInamara, claimed to expect less than 100 people
would volunteer for the program, but they ultimately received more than 10,000 applications. The response from the
drivers was overwhelmingly positive. But regardless, General Motors executives labelled the program of
failure, and they used this as evidence against the mandates and regulations and the EV transition
in general. In 1995, the American Automobile Manufacturers Association, which consisted of
representatives from Ford, Chrysler, and GM, hired a PR firm to campaign against California's
EV mandate. Uncovered documents show that the automakers oppose the mandate.
despite acknowledging a growing demand for EVs.
A lot of activists also believed that oil companies were to blame,
acting out of fear of losing their product relevance in an increasingly electric world.
Their heavy involvement in the early protesting in the California mandates
showed a particular interest in that subject.
Following the closure of the EV-1 production line,
Chevron subsidiary Texaco even purchased the battery manufacturer
that GM had bought to supply the state-of-the-art batteries in the EV-1.
And then there's political interference.
When the automakers faced the state of California during the court case, there was evidence
of direct interference.
It also didn't help that, as mentioned, the president's chief of staff was the head of the same
industry group that hired a PR firm to campaign against the mandates.
While it's likely that it's not just one of these theories, but a combination of them
that ended the electric car, it's clear that regardless of who had the most responsibility,
the reason behind it was consistent.
Profit.
Learning the history of electric vehicles is a sobering lesson in how we repeat history.
The good news is that today the outcome looks completely different.
EV technology has drastically improved and the choices are growing every month.
And many options are even starting to be better than their petrol counterparts.
As more car manufacturers are involved in the electric space and prices begin to drop,
it looks like we're finally here.
But you can't help but think in knowing all of this, that it shouldn't have taken this long.
You also can't help but wonder what could have been if the EV1 didn't get destroyed.
It could have been the very early testbed for future improvements.
If that would have been the case, we could have been at least a decade ahead in terms of innovation.
But alas, I guess that's just how the story goes.
So the next time you see an electric car on the road, think of the EV1.
So anyway, that's about it from me.
My name is Dagogogo and you've been watching Cold Fusion.
But have a look on the channel and browse through some of the topics here.
There's a little something for everyone.
So thanks for watching and I'll see you again soon for the next episode.
Cheers guys.
Have a good one.
