Consider This from NPR - A veteran political reporter shares the lessons she learned hearing from swing voters

Episode Date: August 22, 2026

As a political correspondent, NPR's Ashley Lopez regularly speaks to voters about their worries, and their dreams. But finding swing voters in swing states — the people who can decide elections ��� can be a difficult assignment. For this week’s Reporter’s Notebook, Lopez talks about her larger takeaways from working on NPR’s Swing Voter Project. This episode was produced by Kai McNamee.It was edited by Ben Swasey and Adam Raney.Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorning.Support public media with NPR+ and enjoy perks for over 25 podcasts like this one. This show’s perks include bonus episodes and sponsor-free listening. Learn more at plus.npr.org.See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for sponsorship and to manage your podcast sponsorship preferences.NPR Privacy Policy

It's consider this, where every day we go deep on one big news story. Since January, NPR political correspondent Ashley Lopez has been listening in on focus groups of swing voters, who voted for Joe Biden for president in the 2020 election and then voted for Donald Trump in 2024. Here's Ashley reporting for Morning Edition in May about a group of 12 North Carolina swing voters. What most of these voters expressed was a deep frustration that Trump is out of touch when it comes to the economy. Because he's laser focused on just the war. He's not thinking that $100 in groceries and only gets me two bags of food. Doesn't even last me a week.

That's Vicky. She, like all participants, took part in these focus groups under the condition that her last name wouldn't be used. Vicky's frustration was shared by a lot of these voters. In fact, nine of the 12 said they feel more economically anxious than they did before Trump took office again. Consider this. hearing directly from swing voters can tell a veteran political reporter volumes about the mood of the electorate. Coming up, we hear from NPR's Ashley Lopez about what surprised her most about swing voters' opinions of President Trump as they consider how they'll vote in the midterms. From NPR, I'm Danielle Kurtzleben.

It's consider this from NPR. As a political correspondent, Ashley Lopez regularly speaks to voters about their worries and their dreams. But finding swing voters in swing states, the people who can decide elections, can be a difficult assignment. For this week's reporter's notebook, I wanted to hear about the larger takeaways from NPR's swing voter project. I started by asking Ashley what got her most excited about the project. Well, mostly that this group of voters, this very small sliver of the electorate, I should say, which are swing voters in battleground states, are some of the most powerful voters in America. These people have a real outsized influence, particularly in presidential elections.

The other thing that is really helpful about this is that we work with a messaging firm and a marketing research firm in Gages and Nelson Recruiting. And they do the hard work of finding these people. It is really hard as a journalist to track down like this very small sliver of people that exist in the electorate. And every month, 12 or so of them appear on a screen in front of me and I get to hear from them. And it's like very, very useful. Right.

When I hear your stories about this, I think like, man, Ashley got a room full of unicorns in front of her. Because you and I, we go out to a political event. It is rare. And it's a rare find and a great find when you can find someone who voted for this party and then for that party. And we'll tell you about it. Yeah. And it's a room of 12 people who, I mean, they are people who. are for the most part, not super political, not super engaged. They're low information voters. Not

all of them are likely to vote, even these midterms. Like, they tend to only pay attention every four years. Those are not the people we come across out rallies. It is usually the diehards, the people who are already plugged in, the people who already care. It is a very different group of people here. But it's, they are, they make up the median voter in a lot of ways. So it's, it's endlessly useful as a political reporter to hear what these folks have to say. Right. I mean, How has listening to them changed or influenced your thinking on politics? I mean, in this particular year. I think it's particularly important to hear to people who do not listen to all of the news the way I do.

I'm surrounded. I mean, I'm in a newsroom. I'm surrounded by news junkies and nerds, people who know what's going on. Most of America doesn't. Yeah. And it's really useful as a political reporter to be like, oh, this is what breaks through. This is what people care about. I mean, telling people what is important from your perspective, from the perspective of like,

what is important for a democracy, blah, blah, blah, is one thing. But like, I think another important tool for journalists to keep in mind is like, what do people already care about? Because if you're giving them information that they're not all that invested in, it's fine. Sometimes people need to eat their broccoli newswise. But things that they do care about, I think, are more salient. I think as journalists are sometimes more interesting stories to tell because otherwise you're just like living in your own head and like in your own priorities. I'm curious hearing you talk about that. Can you give an example of something, that really is breaking through with these voters and maybe an example of something you expected

to break through that people just haven't really heard about or aren't thinking about. So definitely the mismanagement of the economy, particularly gas prices. I'm not surprised by that, but I am surprised at like how much people blame Trump for this because for a long time, especially the first year Trump won, it was very unlikely to hear a voter say the economic problems we're facing are not Joe Biden's fault. But then, the war in Iran happened. And it was really interesting to see that switch over and everyone be like, okay, this is officially Trump's economy now and to see how angry voters are. A lot of voters also said that they felt lied to by Trump because he said that he was during his campaign that he would

not be starting new war. So that was one that another one I'm surprised by. And I'm surprised that they're tying those decisions to the state of the economy. Another example of something that I'm surprised isn't breaking through as much is corruption. You know, for so long as reporters, we heard that a thing that voters really care about is like how their taxpayer money is spent, how their elected officials, the people they put in office, how they're behaving and how they're what kind of custodian they are of this like power and money. And we learned recently, right, that like Donald Trump made like about $2 billion since taking office again. Yeah, last year. Yeah. And that is a staggering amount of money, sort of unheard of, you know, a president making while in office.

And I was surprised by folks being like, yeah, you know, I don't really care about this. Some folks said that, you know, I knew this about him. I made peace with this about Trump. He's a businessman before I voted for him. This is a story that I think otherwise, if it was anyone else, would have mattered a lot more than it does to folks right now. I mean, another big theme of your work in general is just people's broader displeasure with the political system. Why is that a draw for you? Well, for one, because these are all choices. I do a lot of stories in the reform space of politics. And I also like look at the way other countries structure their democracies and also how much they change like the electoral systems they use. And in America, like people are frustrated with things that are like fixable. It doesn't have to be this way. Now that's hard and the like the structures in place also make reform hard. But yeah, my bigger analysis of like what ails America is like a lack of imagination. Yeah. Yeah. It's just like everyone. has sort of accepted that things are never not going to be this way and cannot be anything but this way. And it's just not true.

It's just not true. Do you feel like the displeasure has changed over time, though? Yeah, I think right now it's much more economic. People are much more pessimistic about their upward mobility in America, which was not true when, like, we were growing up. I feel like the myth of America is like, you can be whatever you want, you can be a billionaire at the end of all this. That is not a thing I'm hearing reflected from people anymore. Yeah. I think, yeah, the view of the economy being the way it is and people being stuck in either, you know, a situation where they're taking on more debt constantly or people just feeling like, you know, really anxious about what the future of their job is, like people not knowing if their job's going to be around.

That's another particular sort of AI-based fear. But, yeah, I would say I don't think people think broadly about electoral. structure is the way I do. Why not? You know, it's a it's a very, like, esoteric thing to be, like, obsessed about. But I think they do notice that their experience of the economy as it is as a structure. Yeah. I see that changing.

Yeah. All right. Final question and a personal question. You're from Miami. You've lived in Texas. Two states that loom very large in American politics, also just large states. How does your experience in those two states shape your. reporting. This is going to sound like a downer, but I am who I am. It is what it is.

But mostly what I observed in Texas is something I'm observing in Florida now, which is one party being shut out of power for a long time. And what that does to the voters in that party is really interesting. They're very similar in the way I think people talk about politics in both states, which is like, you know, it's a big state that has all these like people of different demographic backgrounds there, but a lot of them are sort of shut out of politics, mostly because there has been unified power. And both states have done a lot to make it harder to vote. They also, both states have a lot of like, almost like policing around elections too that makes people new to politics a little nervous about voting. So, and that is because when you have a

long scope of unified political power. It's a really hard cycle to break. I don't know. It's, there's probably some things to take away that are cheerier, but I do think like at a two-party system, you know, when you have these kinds of structures, you can have a, it's very common to have a situation like Texas and Florida where you're just one party sort of locked in to power for a long time. And it has an interesting effect on voters. I think an optimism about change is a little harder to find in places like that. That is NPR's Ashley Lopez. Thank you for talking to me, Ashley. Thank you, Danielle. This episode was produced by Kai McNamee. It was edited by Adam Rainey and Ben Swayze. Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorney.

It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Danielle Kurtzleben.