Consider This from NPR - Are Trump's military picks based on merit or loyalty?
Episode Date: February 24, 2025On Friday, Donald Trump fired Chairman of the Joint Chief's of Staff CQ Brown, along with several other top Pentagon officials. Now, Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat from Rhode Island, has a question for... the man tapped to succeed him, Retired Air Force Lieutenant General Dan Caine.Quote — "will he have the ability to speak truth to power?" Senator Reed is the top democrat on the Armed Services Committee. The Trump administration says it wants a military built on meritocracy. Critics say it's building one governed by political loyalty.For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
Before he was even tapped by President Trump to lead the Department of Defense, Pete Hegseth
laid out how he thought the incoming administration should overhaul the armed forces.
There's a chance to course correct it, but it would take the new Trump administration
going after it really hard.
This was on the Sean Ryan Show podcast.
And at the top of Hegseth's list?
Well, first of all, you've got to fire, you all, you've got to fire the chairman and joint chief.
That would be General C.Q. Brown, who was the nation's highest-ranking military officer
until Friday night, when he was fired.
Hegseth had attacked Brown for promoting diversity initiatives in the armed services.
In his book War on Warriors, he questioned whether General Brown got the job because
he was black.
On Fox News, over the weekend, Secretary Heg Seth said he has quote, a lot of respect for
Brown but that Trump had the right to dismiss him.
There is civilian control of the military.
Nothing about this is unprecedented.
The president deserves to pick his key national security and military advisory team.
Other presidents have fired high-ranking generals, though none has fired a chairman of the Joint
Chiefs. They serve four-year terms, often across administrations, and though they do serve at the
pleasure of the president, they take an oath to the Constitution. Some Democrats say Trump's move undermines that. They want everyone in DOD to be holding to the president, not to the Constitution.
That's the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Jack Reed of Rhode Island, speaking there on ABC's This Week.
They want everyone there to do what they're told, regardless of the law.
And Senator Reed had this question for Brown's successor.
Will he have the ability to speak truth to power?
Consider this.
The Trump administration says it wants a military built on meritocracy.
Critics say it's building one governed by political loyalty.
From NPR, I'm Mary Louise Kelly.
It's Consider This from NPR.
So this weekend saw six senior officers ousted by the Trump administration, including
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Also included the top lawyers for the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force.
And Trump named his new pick for chairman, retired Air Force Lieutenant General Dan
Cain.
To get a sense of what this shakeup at the Pentagon will mean for the military, I spoke
with Frank Kendall until about a month ago. He was a top Pentagon official as Secretary of the
Air Force. Secretary, welcome to all things considered. Hello, Mary-Lise. Good to be with
you. Hey, so to be clear, your departure was part of the regular turnover when a new administration
takes over, right? No, that's correct. Okay. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as you well know, this is the highest ranking
officer in the US Armed Forces.
They are appointed to serve four-year terms.
They also serve at the pleasure of the President.
So just, it is within a President's powers to pick a new head of the Joint Chiefs, correct?
It is.
I've never seen it done before quite this way. Normally, Chiefs carry
over from one administration to another very smoothly without any interruption. As far as I
know, there was no reason not to do that in this case. You have concerns about General Brown being
fired. Just lay out for us what they are. Sure. First of all, General Brown is one of the, if not
the finest officer I've ever worked with.
One of the things that stands out about
the military services in the United States
is the apolitical nature of all of our officer corps.
And I've been through a lot of transitions
and I have seen in every case,
very smooth professional transitions where people,
they adapt to the policies of the new team in charge,
they follow orders as they should,
and they give good advice.
I wanna play a little bit of what,
this is Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth,
who went on Fox yesterday and spoke about CQ Brown.
Here's what he said.
I have a lot of respect for CQ Brown.
I got to know him over the course of a month.
He's an honorable man, not the right man for the moment.
Hegseth has in past shared his view that the Pentagon needs to be purged of, and I quote,
the woke stuff. And he said that doing so would start with firing CQ Brown, who I will
note is black. How do you think, Secretary, that this may fit into the stated overt efforts by the Trump
administration to scale back DEI? I don't really understand the connection,
quite frankly. I also don't understand the the obsessiveness about wokeness,
whatever that is. You know, it's perfectly within the purview of a new
secretary and president to change policies, and that's perfectly fine. And
I think all the officers who serve
would carry out those orders to be a lawful order,
it'd be no problem.
There isn't much there to actually remove.
There's a few hours of training a year.
And again, I don't know what they mean by wokeness.
I'm not sure what they mean by that at all.
The impact of what they've done is to politicize these positions to agree that I've
never seen before. These officers serve a politically they are loyal to whoever's in power,
they carry out their policies. And what been created by doing this is an environment in which
career officers suddenly have to worry about their political alignment.
And just to stay with the questions about wokeness, I hear you saying you don't even
understand what that means. I think the Trump administration would argue that means diversity
initiatives have been pursued at the expense of performance. In your long experience at the
Pentagon, did you see that? No, absolutely not. We did pay attention to disparities in the Department of the Air Force.
We had some studies that were done under the previous Trump administration that showed significant disparities,
but we never lowered any of our standards about
moving people into positions or promoting them or anything else that was competitively selected.
Do you know General Kaine, President Trump's pick for chairman? Is he
qualified? I do. I have no reason to say that he's not qualified, except for the fact that he does
not have the experience that is normally associated with that job. Normally, and by law, a person who
goes into the chairman's job, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, should have served as a four-star general in
another major command, either as a head of one of the military services or as a head of one of the
major component commands around the world. General Cain has not done that. I also want to ask about
the removal of some of the Defense Department's top military lawyers in this purge. This is not
generating headlines as big as removing the chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Why is it worth paying attention to?
I find that more troubling in a way than removing the other individuals that have been removed.
He seems to want to have JAG officers who will say yes to whatever operational people
want to do. Judge Advocate General's, which are the lawyers in uniform, basically. They're the people who administer the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the criminal
law that applies to people serving, and also interpret things like the laws of armed conflict,
or the laws that would restrict the use of the military against American civilians. So they have
a very important role to play. They're professionals. They're not political appointees at all. So to just reach down within the structure and
remove the legal authorities that would constrain the behavior of the military,
ensure that the military follows lawful orders, is very troubling to me.
Retired Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall, thank you for speaking with us.
Thank you, Mary Louise. Good to be with you. This episode was produced by Jason Fuller and
Connor Donovan. It was edited by Courtney Dornig and Nadia Lancy. Our audio engineer
is Ted Mebane. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan.
It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Mary Louise Kelly.