Consider This from NPR - Can Trump suspend habeas corpus?

Episode Date: May 23, 2025

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem got a pop quiz at a senate hearing this week. The question came from Democratic Senator Maggie Hassan, of New Hampshire.Hassan asked Noem to to explain habea...s corpus. For the record, habeas corpus is the legal principle, enshrined in the Constitution, that protects people from illegal detention. The reason that this bit of Latin is under discussion – is because the Trump administration says it's considering suspending habeas corpus. This core constitutional protection has been an obstacle to the President's mass deportation plan. Habeas corpus is a principle that's hundreds of years older than America itself.What would it mean if the President suspended it? And could he, under the Constitution? For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Transcript
Discussion (0)
Starting point is 00:00:00 Among the responsibilities of the Department of Homeland Security is running the civics tests that immigrants need to pass to become US citizens. And this week, the head of that department, Secretary Kristi Noem, got her own pop quiz on civics. Good morning, Madam Secretary. This was at a Senate hearing. And this question came from Democratic Senator Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire. So, Secretary Noem, what is habeas corpus? Well, habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country and suspend their right to... Let me stop you, ma'am.
Starting point is 00:00:37 ... suspend their right to... Habeas corpus, excuse me, that's incorrect. It is indeed incorrect. As Hassan goes on to lay out, habeas corpus is the legal principle enshrined in the Constitution that protects people from illegal detention. The reason that this bit of Latin is currently under discussion is because the Trump administration says it's considering suspending habeas corpus. Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said this to reporters earlier this
Starting point is 00:01:05 month. Well, the Constitution is clear and that of course is the supreme law of the land that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus can be suspended in a time of invasion. So to say that's an option we're actively looking at. Habeas corpus has been at the center of the legal fights over President Trump's mass deportation plan. Some of his actions have been temporarily blocked by courts over concerns that immigrants didn't have enough opportunity to challenge their deportation through habeas corpus petitions.
Starting point is 00:01:35 And Miller seemed to suggest that suspending habeas corpus was a way to get around the courts. Look, a lot of it depends on whether the courts do the right thing or not. Consider this. Habeas corpus is a principle that's hundreds of years older than America itself. What would it mean if the president suspended it? And could he under the Constitution?
Starting point is 00:02:03 From NPR, I'm Elsa Chang. I'm Tanya Mosley, co-host of Fresh Air. At a time of sound bites and short attention spans, our show is all about the deep dive. We do long-form interviews with people behind the best in film, books, TV, music, and journalism. Here our guests open up about their process and their lives in ways you've never heard before. Listen to the Fresh Air podcast from NPR and WHYY. Know that fizzy feeling you get
Starting point is 00:02:35 when you read something really good, watch the movie everyone's been talking about, or catch the show that the internet can't get over? At the Pop Culture Happy Hour podcast, we chase that feeling four times a week. We'll serve you recommendations and commentary on the buzziest movies, TV, music, and more. From low brow to high brow, to the stuff in between,
Starting point is 00:02:55 catch the Pop Culture Happy Hour podcast from NPR. ["The New York Times"] It's Consider This from NPR. Amanda Tyler wrote the book on habeas corpus, actually two books and a bunch of law review articles. She's a professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley, and we reached out to her to talk through habeas corpus and President Trump's plans. So I just want to start with the very basics here. Under the U.S. Constitution, what is habeas corpus and what does it protect against? Well, literally, habeas corpus is to undergo and receive the body. And what does that mean?
Starting point is 00:03:36 It means that in Anglo-American legal tradition, courts have the right and indeed the obligation when asked to look into the legal justification for someone being arrested and detained by the government. And so for centuries, that is the role that courts have played. They have worked to ensure that the executive, whether it's the King of England or the President of the United States, is not detaining somebody illegally.
Starting point is 00:04:10 Right. And in very plain terms, why should the average American care very much about habeas corpus? It would be hard to overstate the importance of habeas corpus in our constitutional tradition, because it goes to our very personal liberty, our freedom. And we have always had that security, except for in the very rare situations of suspension, that we could go to a court if we're being deprived of our liberty, unlawfully, and win redress, when release. Well, the White House deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller told reporters
Starting point is 00:04:51 that the Trump administration was considering suspending habeas corpus. How big of a deal is it? It is such a big deal. We've had suspensions only extremely rarely in American history in situations like the Civil War and the bombing of Pearl Harbor, and specifically what the Constitution requires is a rebellion or invasion and for the public safety to warrant suspension. And the effect of a suspension is effectively to shutter the courts. And that's why in a case that was argued to the Supreme Court
Starting point is 00:05:26 after 9-11, late Justice Souter once said, suspension is just about the most stupendously significant thing the government can do. Can you explain why the phrase habeas corpus is even coming up in the courts right now with respect to President Trump's immigration actions? The reason it's coming up and become so prominent is because all of the challenges to the president's actions in this immigration context and all of the removals that he's trying to undertake, particularly under his proclamation with respect to the Alien Enemies Act, they're all coming through habeas petitions brought by individuals who've been
Starting point is 00:06:05 arrested and are being detained and are at risk of being removed from the country expeditiously. In large measure, I should say, because the Supreme Court has, in an early emergency order a few weeks ago, said this is how they should proceed. Okay. You mentioned that there are some limited circumstances under which habeas corpus could be constitutionally suspended. Can you first talk about whether the president of the United States can unilaterally suspend habeas corpus? This is a really important question and the answer is a categorical no. The president
Starting point is 00:06:42 does not have the power to suspend habeas ahead of Congress. The founding generation, first and foremost, put the suspension clause in Article I of the Constitution, which is the legislative article. Congress. Right, that is the article that governs how Congress, its powers, how it's assembled, et cetera. So is there an example in US history
Starting point is 00:07:04 where a president tried to unilaterally suspend habeas corpus? Yes, I mean, the classic example here is Abraham Lincoln. And a lot of people point to his example as supporting the notion that the president has this power. But the story is a lot more complex, because as he was proclaiming suspensions on his own, courts were questioning his actions right and left.
Starting point is 00:07:28 And so the Lincoln administration actually went eventually to Congress and said, we really need legal cover. We need you to pass suspension legislation. And after Congress did so, he not only issued a new suspension, he specifically referenced the legislation that Congress had passed as justifying it. And in so doing, I think Lincoln all but conceded that he had
Starting point is 00:07:50 been acting unlawfully up until that point. Danielle Pletka Well, this current Supreme Court has been willing or seems to be willing to grant the president very broad powers. How do you see Stephen Miller's argument, the Trump administration's argument going before the current justices if President Trump does attempt to suspend habeas corpus with respect to his immigration actions? There are so many issues that will come up if the president were to do this. There's the first question of whether the president has the power to do this.
Starting point is 00:08:22 And this is a court that is populated with a number of justices who care very deeply about history and many of whom are originalists and so they're going to care a lot about what the founding generation thought. And there's just really overwhelming evidence that the president doesn't have this power. So I think that would be the probably the start and end. But if the court were to go further, it would also look at whether there is potentially an invasion or rebellion that justifies the suspension.
Starting point is 00:08:54 And the court may have to do that in any event, because by invoking the Alien Enemies Act, President Trump has declared that there is an invasion and that's the predicate for him having exercised that emergency power. And that issue is now percolating in the lower courts. And I think the case for the administration's position is very weak here. Amanda Tyler is a professor of law at the University of California, Berkeley, and the author of Habeas Corpus in W in wartime from the Tower of London to
Starting point is 00:09:25 Guantanamo Bay. Thank you very much for speaking with us. Thank you. This episode was produced by Connor Donovan. It was edited by Courtney Dorning. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan. And we want to take a moment to thank our Consider This Plus listeners who support the work of NPR journalists and help keep public radio strong. Supporters also hear every episode without messages from sponsors. Learn more at plus.npr.org. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Elsa Chang.

There aren't comments yet for this episode. Click on any sentence in the transcript to leave a comment.