Consider This from NPR - Charlie Kirk's chair is empty. Can MAGA harness his movement?

Episode Date: September 15, 2025

With the assasination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk, there’s a great deal of speculation about who will fill his seat, literally and metaphorically.Vice President JD Vance hosted the Charlie Kirk Show on Monday. He talked with a variety of Trump administration heavyweights and conservative media figures, including White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and political commentator Tucker Carlson. The guests reflected on their personal and professional relationships with Kirk, and his many contributions to the second Trump presidency.NPR Senior Political Editor and Correspondent Domenico Montanaro and NPR Media Correspondent David Folkenflik share what they learned from the show about how Charlie Kirk’s legacy is being shaped in real time. For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org.Email us at [e-mail] episode was produced by Connor Donevan and Kira Wakeam, with audio engineering by Ted Mebane. It was edited by Megan Pratz, Emily Kopp and Sarah Handel. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Two days after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the Charlie Kirk show went on. And here we are, because Charlie would want us to be here. He would be upset if we weren't here. That's executive producer Andrew Colvitt near the top of the podcast and broadcast that served mostly as a commemoration of the conservative activist. And we, of course, have left his chair open and empty because nobody will ever fill it. Nobody could ever hope to. Later that night, Charlie Kirk's.

widow Erica Kirk stood at a podium on the show's set, next to the same black leather swivel chair still empty. I want to thank the staffers of this, his amazing Charlie Kirk show, who helped him broadcast from this studio, this chair. They were her first public remarks after his death. And even as she mourned her husband, Erica Kirk spoke to one of the questions that emerged almost immediately after his killing. What will become of the political movement he helped spearhead?

To everyone listening tonight across America, the movement my husband built will not die. It won't. I refuse to let that happen. It will not die. No one will ever forget my husband's name and I will make sure of it. His organization Turning Point USA will continue. So will his show, she said.

Which brings us to Monday's episode. hosted by someone else trying to harness the political energy Charlie Kirk helped inspire. Hey, everybody. J.D. Vance here, live from my office in the White House complex and filling in for somebody who cannot be filled in for, but I'm going to try to do my best. My dear friend, the great Charlie Kirk. Consider this. Charlie Kirk's chair is empty. Can Maga politicians keep his movement going without him? From NPR, I'm Ari Shapiro. It's consider this from NPR. Vice President Vance's appearance on the Charlie Kirk Show Monday wasn't just about Kirk's legacy. It was also an opportunity to air grievances against those Vancey's as responsible for Kirk's death.

We're trying to figure out how to prevent this festering violence. that you see on the far left from becoming even more and more mainstream. For more on the show and what it might portend, we're joined by NPR senior political editor and correspondent Domenico Montanaro and NPR media correspondent David Fulkenflick. Hello to you both. Hey there. Hey there. Domenico, to start with you, often in moments of morning, we hear leaders call for unity.

President Trump has not really been focusing on that message in the last few days. Did Vice President Vance today? Yes and no. I mean, Vance talked about how much he appreciated Democratic colleagues, senators and lawmakers who express their sympathy for Vance after Kirk's death because they know that he was close to Kirk, but then Vance closed with a message of action, pointing out that the administration would be going after those that they view as part of a malignant problem, as he called it, on the left, when it comes to violence.

There is no unity with people who scream at children over their parents' politics. There is no unity with someone who lies about what Charlie Kirk said in order to excuse his murder. There is no unity with someone who harasses an innocent family the day after the father of that family lost a dear friend. There is no unity with the people who celebrate Charlie Kirk's assassination. Now, Bance didn't acknowledge violence toward Democrats, like the murder of a Minnesota state senator and her husband earlier this year, or the 2020 plot to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer, the governor of Michigan, or, of course, January 6th. He also cited polling that he felt backed up his premise that acceptance of violence. is more prevalent on the left. You are the person who monitors polls for NPR. What are the numbers

actually show? Yeah, the numbers he cited were coming from UGov. It was a poll that was taken last week after Kirk's killing. It found 24% of respondents who identified as, quote, very liberal, considered it acceptable for a person to be happy about the death of a public figure they oppose. That's compared to 3% of those who were very conservative. And no doubt, I mean, I've found it disturbing that there's been some glee from some corners with progressives online, but we've seen differences in attitudes over the years depending on what's asked and how it's asked. For example, a public religion research institute poll from last year found that Republicans are far more likely to believe that true American patriots may have

to resort to violence to save the country. And the University of Chicago poll from just before the election last year found a negligible difference between Democrats and Republicans on whether they'd support use of force to either stop Trump from trying to get back to the White House or on the other side to help him. You know, so it cuts different ways, but the White House clearly using that first data point as a justification for saying that it's more rampant on the left. Turning to you, David, a lot of the vice president's guests assigned blame to the political left. How is that shaping the narrative that forms around Kirk's death and his legacy? Right. And that takes you beyond the eulogizing of him as a husband, a father, a friend, a political leader in the mega right and an advisor, obviously,

the Trump world. You know, in this point, you saw people taking the microphone, essentially, to define the reality, define the legacy, and set the tone of what they think should be next. I want to play a clip from you of White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. He talked on the show about channeling the anger about Kirk's murder towards rooting out what he called a domestic terror movement on the left. With God is my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy these networks and make America safe again for the American people. It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie's name.

Making him a kind of martyr for a kind of government-centered vengeance, if we are to take what this powerful White House official says literally, you know, journalism gives you the facts quickly or tries to as well as correctly or tries its best. Can't keep up with speculation, but particularly can't keep up with the digital age, where every opinion somebody might have is rocketed into the ether for salt to absorb. And currently, every framing now from the government comes at us in a variety of ways, including through Charlie Kirk's own show. Domenico, what message does it send when the vice president of the United States hosts the radio show and video podcast for Charlie Kirk from the White House? Yeah, I think it really speaks

to the importance of Kirk in Maga World, you know, not just as an outside operator who helped convince many young voters, young men in particular to become Trump voters, but also as an inside political player. Vance said he wouldn't be VP without him. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said Kirk organized his endorsement event with Trump and advocated on his behalf to be Health and Human Services Secretary. Vance credited Kirk with pushing for White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, for example, to remain as campaign manager when others were calling for her ouster. I think it also speaks to the concern Vance and others have about where the movement goes next. He said specifically he's worried about the quote unquote talent of who would be able to replace Kirk on these college.

campuses, for example. In other words, who is going to be that person to be able to go and be as effective as he was in this style of combative oppositional dialogue? And briefly, David, how would you answer that from a media perspective? Well, the thing that I think in terms of the thing about rhetoric and what's being conveyed anyway is the sense that these were folks who came to power in part because they said we are living in a cancel culture where broad, controversial, incendiary remarks, even those of the kinds of Kirk himself are causing people to be, you know, major lefty institutions in the media to go after them.

But right now, what you're hearing is them wanting to go after those who they see as critics of Charlie Kirk and what he represented and what they want to do. And PR's David Fulkenflick and Domenico Montanaro. Thank you both. You're so welcome. You bet. This episode was produced by Connor Donovan and Kira Joaquin with audio engineering by Ted Mebe. It was edited by Megan Pratt, Emily Kopp, and Sarah Handel.

Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Ari Shapiro. Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon Prime members can listen to Consider This sponsor-free through Amazon music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get Consider This Plus at plus.npr.npr.org. That's plus.npr.org.