Consider This from NPR - Is Trump's immigration bet working?

Episode Date: June 11, 2025

The White House's message on what's happening in Los Angeles is simple: this is what President Trump was elected to do.It is true that polls have found people trust the Republican Party more to handle immigration. A CBS poll taken last week found that 54% approve of Trump's deportation policies. Trump is making a big bet on how far Americans want him to go. He mobilized National Guard and active-duty troops that the mayor and governor say they don't need. The administration says its immigration efforts are focused on criminals. But California Governor Gavin Newsom highlighted other people swept up in workplace raids."A U.S. citizen, nine months pregnant, was arrested; a 4-year-old girl, taken; families separated; friends, quite literally, disappearing." Trump is doubling down in Los Angeles. We hear from a conservative immigration analyst who thinks it will work.For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Email us at [e-mail] more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

The White House message on what's happening in Los Angeles is simple. This is what President Trump was elected to do. President Trump promised to carry out the largest mass deportation campaign in American history and left-wing riots will not deter him in that effort. At his White House press secretary, Caroline Levitt, on Wednesday, it is true that polls have found people trust the Republican Party more to handle immigration. And a CBS poll taken last week found 54% approve of Trump's deportation policies. But Trump is making a big bet on how far Americans want him to go.

He mobilized National Guard and active-duty troops that the mayor and governor say they don't need. Here's California governor Gavin Newsom in a primetime address Tuesday. He deployed more than 700 active U.S. Marines. These are the men and women trained for foreign combat, not domestic law enforcement. We honor their service. We honor their bravery. But we do not want our streets militarized by our own armed forces." The administration says its immigration efforts are focused on criminals, and Press Secretary Levitt rattled off rap sheets of some quote

illegal monsters apprehended in Los Angeles. But Governor Newsom highlighted other people swept up in workplace raids. A U.S. citizen, nine months pregnant, was arrested. A four-year-old girl taken. Families separated. Friends quite literally disappearing. Newsome called the administration's actions unsafe and illegal. Donald Trump's government isn't protecting our communities. They're traumatizing our communities.

And that seems to be the entire point. Consider this. Trump is doubling down in Los Angeles. We'll hear from a conservative immigration analyst who thinks it'll work. From NPR, I'm Mary Louise Kelly. This message comes from WISE, the app for doing things and other currencies. For WP-R, I'm Mary Louise Kelly. T's and C's apply. Support for this podcast comes from Dignity Memorial. For many families, remembering loved ones means honoring the details that made them unique. Dignity Memorial is dedicated to professionalism and compassion in every detail of a life celebration.

Find a provider near you at DignityMemorial.com. This message comes from CBC podcasts with Understood, Who Broke the Internet? Arguing that the modern internet is not living up to its original promise, this four-part series dives into bots, algorithms, and more and offers a plan to fix it. Listen now. It's Consider This from NPR. For insight into the conservative strategy around immigration, we called Simon Hankinson. He's a senior research fellow in the Border Security and Immigration Center at the Heritage

Foundation. Your top-line assessment of the situation as it stands in L.A. And I'll ask that more colloquially. If I bumped into you tonight at a dinner party and asked, hey, I've been away, what's going on in LA? How would you answer? Well, business as usual. I think it was predictable that increased enforcement

or any enforcement of immigration law in the interior after four years of basically ignoring the law would have an impact on major cities and sooner or later there were going to be demonstrations. There was going to be something like the May 2020 riots, demonstrations, whatever you want to call them, public displays of unhappiness. And Los Angeles- You're talking about people in the streets after the George Floyd situation. Yes, exactly. I guess my question just to jump in, if I were again asking you what's happening in LA right now, is it going in your view, is it going well, is it going poorly,

anything surprising you? Unfortunately, I'm not surprised. I think the enforcement is going well on the whole, but in California, obviously, it's hit a bit of a political obstacle. What we're seeing is the city of Los Angeles and the state of California resisting federal efforts to enforce immigration law. And we're not talking about presidential directives here, executive orders, we're talking about immigration law passed by Congress, bipartisan law signed by presidents, Democrats, as well as Republican. Danielle Pletka So you've started to answer this, but I'll just put it too directly. To those who

argue, look, this is the Trump administration who is now claiming credit for averting a crisis, for tamping down violence, but this was perhaps a crisis of the administration's own making. There weren't any protests in LA until ICE agents went in. What do you say? Well, I guess if you take that line of reasoning, then what you're saying is the federal government cannot enforce immigration law. And if they do, the price is there'll be violence in the street. That's sort of an extortion really by a state, a nullification of federal law. And I do understand the president is, he's making a stand here because he can probably see that this will happen in other cities and other states. The president has taken some unusual steps in LA and I want to ask you specifically about sending active duty military over the objections of state and local leaders. In your view, is that justified? I think it's justified when you have a threat to federal property

and when you have local authorities that are unwilling to keep the peace and to protect lives. We saw in Portland in 2020 a federal building was taken over. We saw federal property damaged. We saw a lot of people injured and a couple billion dollars worth of property damage. There's already been some looting and some property damage in Los Angeles.

And I think that's something that the administration really wants to avoid this time. And I'll note that we're seeing reports of fewer clashes Tuesday night. A curfew has kicked in 200 plus people were arrested. That's LAPD statistics. Local law enforcement says we've got this, we can handle it. Well, maybe they say that now but what would they have said had there been no federal response whatsoever?

We saw in in 2020 and we've seen at other periods Local officials essentially letting these things burn out, you know Let's just let them burn some cars and trash some buildings and then we'll go in afterwards and this time it died down much quicker And I think the threat the real threat that there would be an active federal presence was what caused local authorities to crack down earlier than they would, for example, with the curfew that Mayor Bass put on. I mean, I guess if the goal is law and order, if the goal is avoiding ending chaos, I suppose we should note that protests have spread to cities across the country. We're seeing reports

from Seattle, from Dallas, from Chicago, from Boston. So what counts as victory here? I think tactically, victory is that the riots or the demonstrations rather, don't get out of control, that people are allowed to demonstrate peacefully, they're allowed to express their opinions, but that we don't have wide-scale looting, property damage, and, you know, the ruining of lives in generally poor and underprivileged or, you know, business parts of our major cities. That would be a tactical victory. The strategic victory would be that we once again go back to enforcing our immigration law and not ignoring it.

Simon Hankinson of the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation. Thanks so much for your time. Thank you, Mary Louise. This episode was produced by Gabriel Sanchez and Connor Donovan with engineering by Becky Brown. It was edited by Sarah Handel and Courtney Dornan. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Mary Louise Kelly. Support for NPR and the following message come from the Kauffman Foundation, providing

access to opportunities that help people achieve financial stability, upward mobility, and economic prosperity, regardless of race, gender, or geography. Kauffman.org. Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon Prime members can listen to Consider This sponsor free through Amazon Music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get Consider This Plus at plus.npr.org. That's plus.npr.org.