Consider This from NPR - Restrictions On Drag Shows Have A History In The U.S.
Episode Date: March 6, 2023Tennessee passed a bill last week restricting drag shows. The law specifically bans "adult cabaret performances" in public or in the presence of children.In more than a dozen states, Republican lawmak...ers have been pushing similar bills.Historian Jules Gill-Peterson of Johns Hopkins University says laws that target drag have a long history in the U.S, and LGBTQ people have fought back before.In participating regions, you'll also hear a local news segment to help you make sense of what's going on in your community.Email us at considerthis@npr.org.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy
Transcript
Discussion (0)
There's a similar story playing out in more than a dozen Republican-controlled state houses across the country.
You can see it in Kentucky.
There has been an onslaught of attack on the innocence of our children, and that is why I wrote this bill.
That's Republican State Senator Lindsay Titchener.
The attacks she's talking about? I have some examples of what we are trying to stop and
prevent from coming to the state of Kentucky. Drag Queen Christmas. Drag shows. Titchener's
bill would ban them from public property or anywhere they could be viewed by children. It advanced out of
committee last week as opponents chanted shame. Another bill in Idaho would allow parents of
children who've witnessed live shows featuring, quote, sexual conduct to sue for $10,000.
Critics say the language explicitly targets drag shows. Here's Republican State Representative Jaron Crane.
Do you think it would be reasonable that a parent or a child would have the ability to go to a park
and not have to see these shows, whoever's performing them?
That bill passed out of committee last week, too. And last Thursday?
Eyes 26, is adopted.
Without objection, motion reconsidered, stood by table.
Tennessee became the first state to pass one of these laws.
Republican Governor Bill Lee signed a bill that bans adult cabaret shows in public spaces.
Civil rights groups say the consequences of this legislation go way beyond drag shows.
Here's Henry Seaton with the ACLU talking about the Tennessee law which targets, quote,
male or female impersonators.
That can easily be a trans person. You know, there's the phenomenon of walking while trans,
where specifically like trans women of color, while just existing, oftentimes get the police called on them just for, like, being trans.
And in the same sitting where Governor Lee signed that drag show bill, he signed another one.
It banned gender-affirming care for minors in Tennessee. In fact, many of the proposed state laws restricting drag shows are accompanied by
similar restrictions on health care for trans children and teenagers.
Drag performers in some of these states say they're not backing down. After all,
this is not the first time laws in the U.S. have targeted drag or cross-dressing.
Drag queen Marissa Cage in Texas talked to NPR last year.
They're not going to bring us down. We are such a strong community and we've seen it
throughout the years and throughout history. We're going to live our life.
Consider this. Since long before the Stonewall riots of 1969, authorities in the U.S. have tried
to punish gender nonconformity, and queer people have fought back.
After the break, how the past can help us understand the present.
From NPR, I'm Ari Shapiro. It's Monday, March 6th.
This message comes from WISE, the app for doing things in other currencies.
Send, spend, or receive money internationally, and always get the real-time, mid-market exchange rate with no hidden fees.
Download the WISE app today, or visit WISE.com. T's and C's apply.
It's Consider This from NPR.
So, to understand this political moment, with Republicans in more than a dozen states pushing bills that would restrict drag shows, it helps to look to America's past.
There is a long history of laws targeting drag. I spoke with historian Jules Gil-Peterson of Johns Hopkins University to understand the context behind the current wave of bills.
To start in the present day, how do the Tennessee law and other bills like it aim to restrict drag?
The Tennessee law is a very narrowly conceived law. It really is almost like a zoning statute. It declares where drag performance is allowed to take place, how far it has to be from schools, places of worship, things like that, and who's allowed to be in the audience.
Specifically, by equating drag with sexual performances such as stripping or exotic dancing,
it really prohibits, you know, children from being present in the audience. It's the first one to
pass. And a lot of the other legislation in other states have much more expansive definitions of drag
and sort of a definition of drag that essentially means being transgender in public, which is
to say, you know, someone who, according to the law, dresses or wears makeup or acts in
any way that supposedly reflects a gender identity different from the gender that they
were assigned at birth.
These other bills, I think, really raise a lot of alarm in the sense that they really sort of start to get to the point
where imagining just walking down the street in public as a trans person technically might be breaking the law.
And we as a country have, in a way, been here before.
So tell us about the history of these kinds of laws.
It's far from the first time that
dressing in a way that doesn't conform to gender norms has been banned in the U.S.
That's right. We actually have almost 150 years worth of laws in this kind of zone. So in 1863,
San Francisco was actually the very first place to enact what it called a sort of cross-dressing
or masquerade ordinance, which prohibited someone from being out in public if they were wearing clothing that was different from their sort of
legal sex or assigned sex. And those kinds of laws really took off in the late 19th century as a way
of enforcing racial segregation, of confining LGBT people to certain neighborhoods, and really,
you know, empowering the police to harass and
target people based on their appearance. And they were really used for many, many decades,
well into the 20th century. So we're talking about a really long history here.
I'm curious what this could mean for, I don't know, for example, Pride Month in Nashville in
June, when this law will be in effect, if there's a drag queen on a float and children in the
audience, like, is the effort going to queen on a float and children in the audience,
like, is the effort going to be to cover up and conceal or is the effort going to be to throw bricks? Not encouraging violence, just making a reference to Stonewall.
Exactly. I think this is the big question. On the one hand, this all feels very familiar,
but on the other hand, we are in uncharted territory. The notion that the police might
arrive at Pride and start arresting drag queens or frankly anyone
right who could be just sort of dressed in a costume because there could be children in the
crowd is really you know kind of an incredible thing to imagine happening but I think this is
the sort of uncertainty of how these laws are written but certainly some of the other laws
being considered in other states definitely would.
And so the question is, what is going to be the newfound danger that folks are going to face at a popular family-friendly event like Pride? And so as a historian, what lessons do you draw
from your research that you think may be applicable to this next phase of life for LGBTQ people in America.
Yeah, I think the return of these kinds of anti-drag bills in their updated form, you know,
is really painful for a lot of LGBT people. There are plenty of people alive today who remember
what it was like to live under these laws. And so in that sense, it's a really discouraging moment.
But at the same time, that means that there's a lot of expertise and know-how in the community about how to deal with these laws, but also how to successfully oppose them. They have been repealed before. And to me, that, you know, reminds us that no matter what kinds of legislation are being passed today and how cruel or devastating the impact is, these aren't foregone conclusions. And so even if there isn't
an inevitable progress for LGBT people in this country, by the same token, we're not necessarily
locked into the terrain that these news laws prescribe. They could always be opposed and
they could always be overturned.
Johns Hopkins historian Jules Gil-Peterson.
I mentioned at the top of this episode that these bills may have impacts beyond drag performances.
One possible example? High school theater programs.
NPR's Elizabeth Blair explains.
Some of the most popular musicals performed by high school students have characters who either cross-dress or perform in drag, like Angel in Rent.
Other times, out of necessity, boys play girls and vice versa.
For example, girls often end up playing boys in newsies. Non-traditional casting happens routinely,
but for teachers, it takes just one parent to make it an issue. I had a parent who complained
about me a few years ago during James and the Giant Peach, of all things. Jennifer Guffin teaches
theater at Shades Valley High School in Birmingham, Alabama.
She says some of the boys in the show played little old ladies. And the parent was very upset
that I was going to have her son cross-dressing. And she called the board and complained about me,
and I had to have multiple meetings about it to explain, like, this is not a drag show. This is,
like, I'm putting you in a costume for 30 seconds so that you can sing in a silly little part.
The B bills might not
be directed at high school theater, but they're having a chilling effect on teachers, says Jennifer
Katona, executive director of the Educational Theater Association. Teachers are really feeling
that their classrooms or their theater spaces are true safe havens for our students, particularly
our trans students and our LGBQTIA students, yet much of
the atmospheres that they're teaching and working in are not supporting them in those ways. In
choosing what to perform, teachers often look at what shows students already like, and teens have
long gravitated towards material that pushes boundaries, like Ride the Cyclone, a musical
that was written years ago but recently became
a viral sensation among teens on TikTok. Why be left with no family and no friends?
Ride the Cyclone is a dark comedy in which a group of teens die in a roller coaster accident.
Each character takes a turn singing about who they are or how they'd like to be remembered.
It's so popular among teens that the creators are in the process of writing a version that
high schools could perform. But with the drag show bills, that could be a problem, says co-creator Jacob Richmond.
There's a whole drag number that we're trying to figure out how to do in a way that you could do
in a high school setting. That drag number is by a young gay man who works at a Taco Bell.
He loves Jean Genet and film noir and fantasizes about being
a sex worker. It's basically just kind of this is who I am inside as well. And the idea that the imagination is just as much as a part of us as
our daily jobs or what other people define us as. Richmond says the success of Ride the Cyclone on
TikTok points out a disconnect in the drag show bills. They might prevent young people from seeing
drag performers on stage, but they won't stop teens from finding them online.
NPR's Elizabeth Blair.
At the top of this episode,
you heard reporting from NPR's Lily Quiroz in Texas
and from Mariana Bacchia with member station WPLN in Nashville.
It's Consider This from NPR.
I'm Ari Shapiro.