Consider This from NPR - The Cozy Relationship Between Boeing and the Federal Government

Episode Date: January 18, 2024

These days when you think of Boeing, the words that come to mind might be: door plug, 737-max, grounded. But before this month's safety debacle and the Ethiopian and Lion Air crashes five years ago, Boeing was synonymous with industry and innovation, and the company enjoyed a special relationship with the U.S. government and U.S. presidents.Former President Barack Obama joked he was Boeing's top salesman, and former President Donald Trump praised the company at a visit during his presidency.Now that special relationship between Boeing and the U.S. government is under renewed scrutiny.NPR's Mary Louise Kelly talks to transportation correspondent Joel Rose about that relationship and what this latest incident could mean for the company and its oversight.Email us at [e-mail] more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

The president has lots of jobs. Commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces, head of the executive branch of the government. When he was president, Barack Obama joked about another job. I'm expecting a gold watch from Boeing at the end of my presidency because I know that I'm on the list of top salesmen at Boeing. Boeing is a huge part of the American economy. It claims to be the country's biggest exporter. And then there are its suppliers, as Obama alluded to at the same meeting of his export council where he made that salesman crack. Small businesses are up and down the supply chain. And when we sell a bunch of airplanes, a lot of small businesses and medium-sized businesses are benefiting from that as well.

And so American presidents have, for years, been cheerleaders for Boeing. Here's Donald Trump at a Boeing plant in South Carolina in 2017. May God bless the United States of America and God bless Boeing. The special relationship between the U.S. government and Boeing came under scrutiny after two crashes involving the 737 MAX plane back in 2018 and 2019. We must re-examine the current system that allowed for a much too cozy relationship between regulators and companies, including Boeing. That is then-Senator Tom Udall, a Democrat from New Mexico, at a hearing in 2020. He's talking about the system that delegated some of the Federal Aviation Administration's oversight responsibilities over Boeing to Boeing employees. This continues to be a case study of the complete and total failure of self-regulation.

And I think this will go down as one of the big mistakes in history in this area. Now, Boeing is under the microscope again after a panel blew off one of its planes in midair. The FAA grounded 171 planes and opened an investigation into the company's production lines. Consider this. Congress and the FAA took steps to prevent another disaster like the 737 MAX crashes of five years ago. As Boeing faces another safety crisis, we'll take a look at what happened back then and what has changed since. From NPR, I'm Mary Louise Kelly. It's Thursday, January 18th. It's Consider This from NPR. An in-air safety debacle.

Planes grounded by the FAA. Questions about safety and oversight. The latest crisis at Boeing feels a lot like the one that hit the company five years ago. Not much has changed since then. A new CEO, new rules on FAA oversight, new skepticism of a company that has historically been a symbol of American industry and innovation. To walk us through what the last Boeing crisis can tell us about the current one, we're going to hear from Joel Rose, who covers transportation for NPR. Hey, Joel. Hey, Mary Louise. So, you know, normally the U.S. government would resist

putting a finger on the scale in favor of any one private company, as we just heard there. That has not been the case with Boeing. Why? Well, it is such a major piece of the U.S. economy, both as a military contractor and in commercial aviation. It is a huge employer. The U.S. government even has a special bank called the Export-Import Bank that extends financing for overseas buyers. Jokingly, it is called

Boeing's Bank because the company is such a big beneficiary. So the U.S. wants airlines in other countries to buy Boeing's planes. And right now, that is the MAX series. Boeing 737 MAX is the company's biggest seller ever, the key to its financial future. In theory, all of this is not supposed to affect how regulators treat Boeing. In the real world, the company has a lot of power. I talked to Jim Hall. He's the former chair of the National Transportation Safety Board, and he says Boeing acts like it is too big to fail. It's not complicated. There's a great deal of influence exercised through fundraising to members of Congress. There's a great coziness or familiarity between all of the parties. And so who's the bad cop?

No one wants to be the bad cop, Hall says, and Boeing's leaders know that. Okay, but people did start to look at this relationship differently a few years ago. Take us back to this moment, 2019. Actually, 2018 and 2019, there are two crashes of Boeing jets under very similar circumstances. They both involve the same plane, the 737 MAX 8. Hundreds of people were killed. After the first crash in Indonesia, Boeing maintained that the pilots were mostly to blame. And then about five months later, there was a second crash, Ethiopian Air, in 2019, which was nearly identical to the first. At that point, regulators in other countries mostly grounded the Boeing MAX 8 immediately. The Federal Aviation Administration, though, was basically the last to take that action.

The last to take action. Okay. And so investigators started digging into what happened, what they find. They found systemic problems at Boeing, both with the design of the airplane and with pilot training. And there were some dramatic moments when Boeing CEO Dennis Mullenberg testified before Congress back in 2019. We can and must do better. We've been challenged and changed by these accidents.

Mullenberg was surrounded at that hearing by family members holding up photos of the crash victims. There was one mother there by the name of Nadia Milleron. Mullenberg was surrounded at that hearing by family members holding up photos of the crash victims. There was one mother there by the name of Nadia Milleron. She lost her daughter, Samia Stumo, in the second crash. Our daughter got on the plane completely trusting, and she never dreamed that there would be any problem with the plane itself. That was Milleron speaking with NPR's Morning Edition the week of the hearing. Milleron actually confronted Mullenberg, the Boeing CEO, after the hearing.

I asked him to resign because I said that he made decisions which killed people, and then he refused to acknowledge it. The plane was rushed into production. There are many aspects of this plane that are not safe, and that is what I want the American public to know and the flying public to know, because they have to protect themselves. And Mullenberg was pushed out as CEO of Boeing just a few months after that. Okay, so Joel, this all lands us to the question of Boeing and how it is regulated or not regulated. And this curious fact that the FAA actually

turned over some of its oversight responsibilities to Boeing employees, how did that system come to be? Yeah, this has been the norm for quite a while. The FAA has delegated some of its oversight authority to manufacturers going back all the way to the 1950s. The FAA has come to rely more and more on Boeing, though, over time as the planes have gotten more complex and the supply chains have as well. Peter Robison is an investigative reporter for Bloomberg News and wrote a book about Boeing called Flying Blind. He spoke to NPR's Here and Now earlier this month. And here's a bit of that interview. What I traced was a distortion in the relationship where the regulator came to feel almost that it worked for Boeing. The managers worked very closely with Boeing to speed production of planes,

and the managers at the FAA really came to treat Boeing as its customer rather than the flying public as the people it was serving. Robison says he saw this accelerating in the early 2000s as regulators were pushed to hand off more work to Boeing. Because they trusted Boeing and these engineers knew the planes best and also because it was cheaper for the FAA. And around the same time, a lot of Boeing watchers say the culture at the company was shifting too,

to be more focused on the bottom line and less focused on safety. Okay. So that's the system as it was. Then you had these two awful crashes, these two big 737 MAX disasters. What changed? going to be a bigger priority. The MAX 8 planes were grounded for almost two years before they finally start flying again. And Boeing seemed to be slowly recovering from these crashes. Yeah. And now we find ourselves at the start of 2024, and there's this latest dangerous incident on a Boeing MAX plane, this time the 737 MAX 9. Was this also a failure in design, in regulation? Well, there's a lot about this incident that is different. We're talking about an Alaska Airlines flight earlier this month where a panel known as a door plug blew out in midair. The investigation

is still ongoing into what caused this, but so far it appears to be a problem in the manufacturing process, not a design flaw. And also, of course, no one died in this incident. But Boeing's critics would say there is a troubling similarity, which is that the company once again seems to be putting the bottom line ahead of safety by rushing these planes off the factory floor at the rate of more than one per day. This time, I will say Boeing has moved a lot faster to acknowledge the mistake. Here's CEO David Calhoun speaking at an all-hands meeting last week at a factory outside of Seattle. We're going to approach this, number one, acknowledging our mistake. We are going to

approach it with 100% and complete transparency every step of the way and to make sure that this event can never happen again. One other key difference I want to note is the reaction of the FAA. This time, they grounded the similar MAX 9 planes very quickly, and they seem to be in no rush to recertify them to fly again. Okay, so everybody's trying to handle this differently, handle it better, but it does prompt the big question, are all those changes in FAA oversight and regulation that Congress passed back in 2020? Are they working? Is it enough? The FAA says it is looking at bigger changes now in the wake of this latest incident. The head of the FAA, Mike Whitaker, said last week that the agency will consider whether to

bring in a third party to oversee safety at Boeing, which would be a huge shift. I mean, the bottom line is the FAA is in a very difficult spot. They cannot inspect every bolt on every plane. But business as usual does not seem to be a good option either. We are talking about possibly reinventing how the agency regulates one of the biggest players, not just in the aviation industry, but, you know, the entire U.S. economy. Thank you, Joel. You're welcome. And Pierce Joel Rose.

This episode was produced by Connor Donovan. It was edited by Catherine Laidlaw and Courtney Dourning. Our executive producer is Sammy Yennekin. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Mary Louise Kelly.