Consider This from NPR - The Potential Impact Of The Decision To Overturn Roe v. Wade

Episode Date: May 3, 2022

The right to an abortion in the United States appears closer than ever to being eliminated, after a draft of a majority opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade was leaked. Should it stand, the court's ruling wouldn't ban abortion nationwide, but would leave the decision up to individual states. Many Republican-led states are ready to enact their own bans, should Roe v. Wade be overturned, which could leave tens of millions of people without access to abortions.NPR congressional correspondent Kelsey Snell, national political correspondent Mara Liasson, and national correspondent Sarah McCammon explain the far-reaching effects this draft could have on abortion-rights advocates, as well as its potential impact on the midterm elections later this year.In participating regions, you'll also hear a local news segment to help you make sense of what's going on in your community.Email us at [e-mail] more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

This message comes from Indiana University. Indiana University is committed to moving the world forward, working to tackle some of society's biggest challenges. Nine campuses, one purpose. Creating tomorrow, today. More at iu.edu. The right to an abortion in the United States appears closer than ever to being eliminated. Last night, shortly after 8 o'clock, Politico published a leaked draft of a majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito that would overturn Roe v. Wade. Abortion is health care! Abortion is health care!

As the news spread, a crowd started to form outside the Supreme Court. My body, my choice! My body, my choice! Juliet Maltz was among the first people to show up. She plopped herself cross-legged in front of the marble steps. She said she had to come. Because a week ago I had a pregnancy scare. Because a week ago I thought I might be pregnant,

and I didn't know what to do, and I'm not. But to hear this a moment later, I was terrified. Terrified for herself, she said, and for anyone who might soon be unable to end an unwanted pregnancy. The court's draft ruling, if it becomes final, would not ban abortion nationwide. It would leave that up to each state. Many Republican-led states are ready to enact their own bans. Morgan McFarland's voice quivered at that prospect. I have friends that aren't in blue states that are at risk right now,

and I don't think that they deserve to be at any greater risk than I do just because of where they live. They still live in the United States. Kira Thornton said she has been dreading this moment, but also preparing for it. I just got an IUD because I was scared that this was going to happen so that I could be protected for five more years. And I was right. Most of the hundreds of people who flocked to the court steps last night were abortion rights supporters. But abortion rights opponents also came. Katrina Fee was here with a group of classmates. I came out here because it is so important that the nation see that there are young people like me across America that are

so hopeful for the future of this country now that the court has potentially decided to overturn Roe. Why does she feel so strongly about this? I was a triplet. My parents' doctors suggested that I be aborted for convenience. Thank God my parents chose life. Herb Garrity leads an anti-abortion rights group and said that if the Supreme Court does overturn Roe, abortion opponents should start to focus in part on discouraging illegal abortions and on supporting mothers and their new babies. For so many pregnant people, they feel as though abortion is their only option, and there's nothing pro-choice about that. I hope that we can unite and work together to meet the needs of young families. Those needs need to be met in our communities. Anne Mesnicoq stood alone, quietly, nearby, thinking, she said, about her daughter and her disbelief

that a right women have held for 50 years in this country seems on the brink of being snatched away. You know, it's a terrible moment to have the Supreme Court take away a woman's right to choose. And if that draft becomes the law, it has huge impacts across the country. Consider this. The draft opinion is not law, but it could affect some 40 million people

of reproductive age, people who live in states that have already signaled their intention to restrict or ban abortion if Roe v. Wade is struck down. We'll take a close look at the reaction to the draft and its impact, including potentially major ramifications for the midterm elections later this year. From NPR News, I'm Adrian Florido. It's Tuesday, May 3rd. This message comes from WISE, the app for doing things in other currencies. Send, spend, or receive money internationally, and always get the real-time mid-market exchange rate with no hidden fees. Download the WISE app today or visit WISE.com. T's and C's apply.

It's Consider This from NPR. If the decision to overturn Roe is ultimately handed down from the court, the political implications could be monumental. Last night's leak has already triggered a political earthquake. We're joined now by NPR national political correspondent Mara Liason, NPR's Kelsey Snell on Capitol Hill, and NPR's Sarah McCammon, who covers abortion. Welcome to all of you. Hello. Happy to be here. Mara, let's start with you. Chief Justice John Roberts today confirmed that this draft decision

was authentic. He said it is not final. President Biden had a pretty strong reaction after the chief justice announced that. He called this draft decision radical before taking off in Air Force One today. If the rationale of the decision as released were to be sustained, a whole range of rights are in question. A whole range of rights. And the idea we're letting the states make those decisions, localities make those decisions, would be a fundamental shift in what we've done. What do you make of that reaction, Mara? Well, he talked about two things, what's at stake, meaning all these other things that would fall under the right to privacy, which that draft questioned, the right to marry, gay marriage,

the right to use contraception, That would also be in the balance. So the president was focusing on what's at stake other than just the right to abortion. And then he also talked about the remedy. He said it's up to voters to elect pro-abortion rights legislators at every level, Senate, House, also state legislatures. And this is the big question for Democrats. They've never been seized with the importance of the courts like conservatives have who have focused for 50 years on overturning Roe. Democrats haven't done that. And now the question is, does this ruling, assuming it becomes a ruling, have a boomerang effect? Will liberal voters feel like their rights are under threat? Will they be more energized to come out to vote? Or will this take a second or third place behind inflation, crime, and immigration as issues for the midterms?

We don't know that yet. Well, Kelsey, now that Democrats in Congress know that this draft opinion could become final in the coming months, do they have any plans to act on abortion protections? Well, the vast majority of them said they're outraged. They say these are the kinds of actions Democrats have warned voters could happen since way back during the 2016 presidential election when Republicans held up former President Obama's nominee to replace Justice Antonin Scalia after he died. You know, Democrats generally promise today to fight to protect Roe.

And Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer promised that there will be votes even if they fail. It's a different world now. And Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer promised that there will be votes even if they fail. It's a different world now. The tectonic plates of our politics on women's choice and on rights in general are changing. Every senator now under the real glare of Roe v. Wade being repealed by the courts is going to have to show which side they're on. But, you know, in reality, Democrats do not have the votes to pass federal abortion protections right now. And putting people on the record might be the best they can hope for. They would need either 60 votes to overcome a filibuster or a feasible plan to end the filibuster. I will note that Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia told reporters today that he still supports the filibuster.

Well, that's Democrats. I want to ask you about two Republican senators, though, Kelsey, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine. They have both supported abortion rights in the past. Right. And they both said the decision would be inconsistent with what they were told by justices during their confirmation processes. Collins specifically named justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh. Murkowski went further, and she told a group of reporters that a draft decision rocked her confidence in the court. A little bit later, she added this. It was not the direction that I believed that the court would take based on statements that have been made about Roe being settled and being precedent.

Now, you know, they both pointed to a narrow bill that they've supported and sponsored that talks about prohibiting states from imposing what they call an undue burden on the ability of a woman to obtain an abortion. But that would allow states to impose some restrictions still. And, you know, that plan might win their support. But two Republicans and 48 or 50 Democrats still does not equal the 60 votes they would need for the bill to pass. Sarah McCammon, I'd like to bring you in here. You're going to be reporting on this elsewhere in the program. But briefly, what are abortion rights advocates saying about this Supreme Court leak? Well, as you might expect, even though this was somewhat expected,

they're saying it's devastating, especially for people who already struggle to get access to abortion disproportionately, people of color, people in rural areas. But they are expressing some optimism that this could galvanize Democratic voters in the 2022 midterms, as well as in 2024. Meenie Tamaraju, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, believes that this is going to be a wake-up call, as she put it, that will turn out progressive voters even more than, for example, after the 2016 election, which did lead to a blue wave in 2018. We are seeing a ton of support and energy from our advocates, our donors, our voters, our volunteers to mobilize. Sometimes you need

that extra push. And unfortunately, as horrific as this is, this is probably it. And we're going to invest significantly to make it so. And on that note, a coalition of major reproductive rights groups, including NARAL, announced that they're spending $150 million this year toward voter mobilization efforts. They're targeting congressional races, of course, along with governor's races, given the increasing importance of state legislation. And what about abortion opponents, Sarah? They've been wanting to overturn Roe v. Wade for a long time. If the court does, in fact, follow through, where do they go from here? Well, they've been a little cautious in their response,

given that this is a leaked draft. But this has been a decades-long goal, if this holds. A coalition largely made up of conservative Catholics and evangelical Protestants have been working strategically toward this goal at every level of government for decades, trying to pass state laws that could soon ban most abortions in about half of U.S. states. I talked to Kristen Hawkins with Students for Life today. She says her group is working to pass more early abortion bans around six weeks or earlier. We need to be talking about a law that bans abortions when children's heart

begin to be detected or laws that protect life at conception. And her group and others are working toward the idea of a national abortion ban that, of course, would take a majority in Congress as well as the White House. But it is one of their longer term goals. Kelsey, is that something that Republicans in Congress are talking about? Republicans I talked to today, and I talked to many, they really didn't engage with the substance of the decision or discuss whether they would go further to pass federal abortion restrictions if they do take majorities in the House and the Senate. You know, instead, they mostly focused on the leaker. They called for an investigation and some called for eventual prosecution of the leaker.

I should point out, though, that polls have consistently shown that a majority of Americans oppose overturning Roe v. Wade. The latest Gallup data has 58 percent of Americans against overturning it. And an NPR poll last month gave Republicans a broad advantage in the midterms, but also indicated that voters feel Democrats would do a better job on the issue of abortion by 11 points. Mara, a quick final word goes to you. The Supreme Court prides itself on the idea that it's not a political body. So what are the implications of the court making such a major ruling and potentially breaking with public opinion on an issue that stirs up such strong feelings? Well, historically, the Supreme Court has been on the opposite side of majority public opinion many, many times. But what's happening now is that there's a much bigger debate that's

starting. A majority of the Supreme Court justices were appointed by presidents who became president despite losing the popular vote. And the senators who confirmed some of those justices represented a minority of Americans. So we're moving from a system where the founders wanted minority party rights to be protected to a system that is looking a lot more like minority rule, whether it's extreme gerrymandering or the

Senate structure or the Electoral College. And the big question is, does the majority of Americans want this to continue or not? That was NPR National Political Correspondent Mara Liason, National Correspondent Sarah McCammon, and Congressional Correspondent Kelsey Snow. It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Adrian Florido.