Consider This from NPR - Trump's Trials: 'The boss is not going to leave'

Episode Date: November 18, 2023

Today we're sharing an episode of a new NPR podcast called Trump's Trials, hosted by Scott Detrow with regular analysis from Domenico Montanaro. Each week they'll break down the latest courtroom drama, testimony, and legal maneuverings in the criminal and civil cases facing former President Trump — and talk about what it all means for American democracy. In this week's episode, Scott and Domenico spoke with NYU's Melissa Murray about leaked confidential videos of two former Trump lawyers — and what they could mean for the Georgia election interference case. Plus: a development in the January 6th case. Follow Trump's Trials on Apple Podcasts or Spotify for episodes available every Saturday.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

Hey, it's Scott Detrow. So former President Donald Trump is in serious legal trouble, and at the same time, he wants his old job back. This is a really big story, but with different trials in multiple states, with plea deals, with testimony, gag orders, everything else, it's also just really hard to follow. So we have created Trump's Trials, a new NPR podcast hosted by me, where we break down the big news from each of Trump's cases and talk about what it all means for democracy.

Each episode is about 15 minutes, and we are sharing the latest one with you here today. If you like it, you can search for Trump's Trials on your podcast app and follow the show for weekly episodes that post each Saturday. Thanks for listening, and we'll be back with our usual new episode of Consider This tomorrow. Leaked confidential videos of former Trump lawyers could shake up the Georgia election interference case. From NPR, this is Trump's Trials. I'm Scott Detrow. This is a persecution. Felony violations. For national security laws. We need one more indictment. Criminal conspiracy. To close out this election. He actually just stormed out of the

courtroom. Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Once a week, we talk through the latest developments in the legal trials of former President Donald Trump. We have updates on the New York civil trial and the January 6th federal election interference case that we'll get to in a moment. But this week, the main focus is that Georgia election interference case. Remember, this is the racketeering, a RICO case against Trump and many other co-defendants.

Four of those co-defendants have taken plea deals already. And now with these leaked videos, we've learned more about the conversations inside the White House between Election Day and Inauguration Day. A lot to discuss here. And as always, I am joined by my colleague and friend, senior political editor and correspondent, Domenico Montanaro. Hey, Domenico. Hey, Scott. All right. The 60 seconds or less recap of this week. What have you got for me? I set the timer here. I got it. Three, two, one, go. The big thing is it has to be this moment. He said the boss is not going to leave under any circumstances. We are just going to stay in power. And I said to him, well, it doesn't quite work that way, you realize. And

he said, we don't care. That's Jenna Ellis, one of Trump's former lawyers, recounting a conversation she had with then senior White House official Dan Scavino. As part of a plea deal, she agreed to cooperate with prosecutors. Her statement, part of which we just heard, appears it could really damage Trump. But this is something that can ultimately hurt the prosecution. Fulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis said that she was not happy that this was released. And in response, she filed for a protective order, which was granted. It's about 50 seconds, Domenico. You're such a pro. Got there. A lot to get into here. We'll also be joined by lawyer and law professor Melissa Murray.

Stick around. We'll be right back. We are once again joined by Melissa Murray. She's a lawyer and law professor at NYU and the co-author of the upcoming book, The Trump Indictments. Thanks for being here, Melissa. Hi, thanks so much for having me. So the most interesting developments this week happened in Georgia, where Trump, as a reminder, and several others are facing multiple charges tied to their efforts to overturn the 2020 election. Four of those defendants have taken plea deals already, and those plea deals require them to cooperate with the prosecution. And that's where the news

was. As part of that cooperation, the defendants sat down for lengthy interviews with prosecutors to tell them what they know. And this week, several of those interviews, including conversations with key Trump lawyers, Sidney Powell and and Jenna Ellis were leaked to ABC News. Domenico, what were the main headlines from these tapes? Well, seeing Jenna Ellis sort of flip on Trump was really notable and saying that she'd heard from one of Trump's aides, Dan Scavino, that the boss isn't going to leave office. Really kind of a fascinating thing to show sort of Trump's state of mind and how much he really wanted to stay in power. But Melissa, Trump's legal team was pretty quick to respond to that saying, who cares what this aide said in a sense, because for all the other things that happened, Trump did leave office. He didn't hold himself up in the White House. He didn't try to remain president. No, that's right.

And you can imagine what the response to this would be at trial. One, to discredit Jenna Ellis as someone who has a real incentive to play nice with the prosecution, but also someone who may not actually be that truthful herself. She was formerly a co-defendant. They will also, I think, note that this was a statement that Jenna Ellis heard from someone else, Dan Scavino. She did not hear this from Trump himself. So it doesn't actually go to provide clear evidence of Trump's own mindset with regard to staying in power or leaving peacefully. One thing I will note, it wasn't just Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis whose videos were leaked. There was also a very interesting

video leaked of Kenneth Chesbrough's proffer to the prosecution where he talked about his role in advancing this plot to put forth fake electors in battleground states like Georgia and also Arizona. And again, I think that actually does support the indictment's claim that this was a far-reaching and very intricate conspiracy to overturn the election that did not just focus on Georgia, but in these other battleground states that had been called for Joe Biden by very narrow margins. And Domenico, we learned where some of these videos came from, and it was kind of a flashback to many things that have happened over the Trump years of several different people with competing motives trying to work the press in addition to the political system and the legal system. Now, I was going to say, sometimes these things come from

places that people don't necessarily expect, right? I mean, you would think that evidence that comes forward, a video that seems to make it look bad for Trump would come from the prosecution, right? Well, not exactly in this case, because a lawyer for one of the co-defendants in this case, the Coffey County election supervisor, Misty Hampton, admitted that he was the one who actually leaked this video. Did that surprise you, Melissa? What did you think about that? Nothing surprises me anymore about what's going on with these 19 co-defendants. We should figure out how to say nothing surprises me anymore in Latin, and that can be the motto.

Yeah, because we've said it too many times in English. Or just press play for like the many times we've said that. But Fonny Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, responded here very unhappy, asked for a protective order in the case in response to this leak. What would that mean? Well, the fact that there has been a request for a protective order and Judge McAfee is going to respond to this. I mean, I think Fannie Willis is worried that the leaks of these proffers will be opportunities for witness tampering, for intimidation of witnesses. And obviously, those are things that should be avoided. We've already seen Jenna Ellis has been under fire from Trump's base for her faithlessness and again, for turning on

her former boss. So I think those are very real concerns and, you know, keeping this under wraps would help to mitigate that. And it certainly could be a problem for Trump's team if this is granted because it would make it harder for his team to prep. And I think that's going to be something that the judge actually has to take into consideration. That's exactly right. Before we shift to some of the other trials, anything else of all of this that jumped out to either of you? I mean, we find ourselves in this familiar situation of stuff playing out in the press. At Domenico, I'm also kind of reminded of a lot of the Trump legal, the Trump investigative stuff that happened when he was in office, where you see this really splashy headline. It seems like there's a shocking development and you read through it and you think like, well, it's interesting, but maybe it's not quite what it seemed, right? It's a hearsay

conversation with an aide who has a suspect track record. Well, I mean, I think that it's, there's a huge difference between an actual court and a court of public opinion and how these things can be framed and looked. But the thing that was interesting to me is it's again, you have Jenna Ellis, who was a lawyer who was close to Trump, who was involved in this process, who's flipped. And that's part of what you want to do in a RICO case is sort of make your way up the pyramid. And it really got personal and nasty when it comes to the Trump loyalists and Jenna Ellis, because Laura Loomer, who's close to Trump, failed Florida congressional candidate, conspiracy theorist, called Jenna Ellis a waste of space and a fake Christian.

Ellis responded back saying, oh, no mention of Trump Jr.'s divorce. I mean, this got really, really personal. It did devolve very quickly. I will say, for my part, the most interesting and honestly just really like alarming confession in this proffer was when Sidley Powell admitted that she didn't really know a lot about election law. And that actually was hilarious to me. I mean, girl, what? You've been talking about the election and election fraud for months. You gave a whole press conference about this and then come to find out you actually don't know anything about election law. It is amazing to me how the threat of jail time

sort of breaks the hypnosis and seems like a shot of truth serum for a lot of people. I mean, this is also the legal team, just to say when you point that out, that as far as we can tell, possibly mixed up the Four Seasons Hotel with Four Seasons Total Landscaping. Elite legal strike force. Exactly. You mentioned Donald Trump Jr. I'm just going to mention that we last week talked about how he, his brother, and former President Trump himself

all testified in that civil case. Trump Jr. was on the stand in that civil case again this week, this time testifying for the defense, and not surprisingly, turning it into a Trump infomercial talking about all the amazing resorts, all the amazing commodities, what an amazing business figure his father is.

Now I'm going to go down to Washington and we're going to talk a little bit about the federal January 6th case. Our national justice correspondent, Kerry Johnson, has been reporting on the case this week and the fact that Trump's legal team had requested to strike references to the violence at the Capitol on January 6th. But the judge in that case, Tanya Chutkan, rejected that motion late last night. Melissa, this is interesting here because Jack Smith, the special counsel, made a choice not to file insurrection or incitement charges tied to the violence of that day, right? That's right. But regardless, what happened on January 6th is a key part of his case.

No, I think that's right. So Jack Smith had a lot of different options for charging Donald Trump. The January 6th committee, you'll remember, had recommended that Trump be charged with insurrection and inciting the violence at the Capitol. But Smith declined to do that. And I think that was a very smart choice to keep the indictment narrow and very lean. But interestingly, it did charge Donald Trump with conspiracy to obstruct these official proceedings, the counting of the electoral votes. And notably, many of the January 6th rioters have also been charged with that crime.

And so I think a big part of why there are mentions of the insurrection at the Capitol and why the prosecution is at great pains to keep those mentions available for trial is because they want to make the connection that we have other defendants who have been successfully prosecuted for this crime, the January 6th rioters, and this individual is also someone who should also be successfully prosecuted on this charge, this conspiracy to obstruct official proceedings. So I think that's a big reason why. I also think it's why the Trump team does not want it in.

It's highly prejudicial to associate Donald Trump with the violence that so many Americans saw play out on their television screens on January 6th. They don't want any part of it. But unfortunately, it seems like it's going to be a very big part of it. And politically, really interesting that the Trump team is sort of pushing to get the D.C. proceedings on camera, because clearly Trump wants to be able to make a political case to people going forward. We also saw a whole bunch of media organizations join in because, of course, they want to put that on television. A little bit different incentive for that.

But clearly we're seeing Trump playing this two-sided thing where he has to talk in court and try to win in court, but also try to win in public opinion. He did waive his initial court appearance in Georgia where court hearings are televised. And I thought that was surprising when that happened this summer. But it seems like a different course here saying, no, we want all of this on television. Yeah. And I mean, the timing of all of this, when are all of these cases going to actually be? And we saw in Georgia, August 5th is one place where they're trying to ask for that time to be, which would be right in the middle of a campaign. And we talk about the collision between politics and the legal calendar. The Trump team was saying this is completely

politically motivated because it's right smack in the middle of when the general election would be happening. Right now, Trump's got a huge cushion in this primary, so he can deal with these legal obstacles. Very different when you're talking about how swing voters might view this in a general election. And I want to wrap this up with a big picture question for both of you. And Melissa, I'll start with you. What from this week is going to have an impact going forward here? What from this week will have an impact going forward? Well, I think we can't discount the proffers in the Georgia case.

I mean, we're getting a sense of why this multi-defendant RICO case was such a strategic choice for Fannie Willis. Like, we are seeing people plead up, and they're actually offering information that really does go to the heart of the crimes charged in the Georgia indictment. And I think as we get closer and closer to a trial date in Georgia, I think there will be more of this, perhaps even more guilty pleas that are entered. But, you know, what we saw in Washington, D.C. with Judge Chutkan, I think that's also really relevant. You know, whether

you like it or not, the events of January 6, 2021 are going to loom large across all of these cases. I mean, even the Mar-a-Lago documents case. I mean, the idea of a president who doesn't want to leave office is very consistent with the idea of a president who does not believe that he is obliged to turn over official records to the National Archives. So all of this sort of goes to a pattern of thinking that you are above the law, thinking that you are somehow exceptional and extraordinary. That's a really good point. It makes sense when you say it that way, but I hadn't thought about them tied together that way before. Domenico, what about you? What from what we talked about or what we saw this week is going to matter down the line? Well, I do think seeing more and more people potentially flip and move up that ladder, I think is really important when it comes to the pressure that's

only building in this case. We're seeing political pressure that's continuing to build. Obviously, the legal pressure as the trial dates start to come closer and closer and more and more attention is going to be paid not just to the presidential election, but then in turn also these trials. And it's been fascinating then politically to watch the Republicans who are trying to take on Trump really have kind of fingers in the ears on this and not want to push forward in sort of criticizing Trump. And even the new House speaker, Mike Johnson, this week, pushing to release January 6 tapes when everyone saw what happened on television. But again, this is another effort by Republicans to sort of insulate Trump.

That was NPR's senior political editor and correspondent, Domenico Montanaro, as well as NYU law professor, Melissa Murray. Thanks to both of you. You're welcome. Thank you. We will be back next week with another episode of Trump's Trials. And be sure to follow more of NPR's political coverage from Domenico and the rest of the NPR politics team in daily episodes of the NPR Politics Podcast. Thanks, as always, to our supporters who hear this show sponsor-free. If that's not you, it could be.

Sign up at plus.npr.org or subscribe on our show page at Apple Podcast. The show is produced by Tyler Bartlim and Mia Venkat and edited by Adam Rainey and Steve Drummond. Our technical director is Kwasi Lee. Our executive producers are Beth Donovan and Sammy Yenigan. Eric Maripoti is NPR's vice president of news programming. I'm Scott Detrow. Thanks for listening to Trump's Trials from NPR.