Consider This from NPR - U.S. foreign aid changed in 2025 – and it was felt around the world

Episode Date: December 26, 2025

On the night of his inauguration, President Trump signed an executive order that froze almost all international assistance.What followed was the termination of billions of dollars in aid programs — and the dismantling of the U-S Agency for International Development. Now, the future of U.S. foreign assistance looks very different.NPR global health correspondents Fatma Tanis and Gabrielle Emanuel have been following this all year and break down the impact of this move both on the ground and for the U.S.For sponsor-free episodes of Consider This, sign up for Consider This+ via Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org. Email us at [e-mail] episode was produced by Mallory Yu, with additional reporting by Jonathan Lambert. It was edited by Patrick Jarenwattananon and Rebecca Davis. Our executive producer is Sami Yenigun.Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoicesNPR Privacy Policy

On the night of his inauguration, President Trump signed an executive order that froze almost all international assistance for 90 days. Shortly after that, the State Department has issued an expansion on President Trump's executive action Monday to freeze foreign assistance for 90 days. In a memo, Secretary of State Marco Rubio ordered a pause on foreign aid spending and a stop work order for any existing humanitarian and development projects. What followed was the termination of billions of dollars in aid. which funded everything from infrastructure building to vaccination programs to getting supplies into sensitive conflict zones. Experts like Abby Maxman, President of Oxfam America, warned at the time that this move could have a destabilizing effect in countries where that AIDS critical. It's having seismic impacts for the entire global aid system. And really, frankly, it's a cruel decision that has life or death consequences for millions of people around the world.

One small U.S. foreign aid program working to eliminate so-called neglected tropical diseases was shut down this year. Those diseases affect more than a billion people worldwide and can be debilitating. Mamadu, Kui Bali, coordinate several disease elimination programs for the Mali Ministry of Health. It was like a thunderbolt. This lack of financing has stopped our activities. He says the country has used its own money to fill the financial. void, but it just isn't enough. These are diseases that make someone completely invalid.

They have a very heavy impact on the development of the country. There could be a return of these diseases if we're not careful. Over in southwest Uganda, locals note that refugees are spending less on food. That's because the U.S. has not renewed its contributions to the U.N.'s World Food Program that helped them buy groceries. Economist Dean Carlin works on anti-poverty programs. in the region. Because of the cutbacks in aid, there was less economic activity going on. The markets were not as thriving, and they could actually see that difference. As the Trump administration

ends its first year, some foreign aid money is flowing again, but much less than before. And the future of U.S. foreign assistance now looks very different. Consider this, the complete overhaul in foreign aid policy is affecting people on the ground who need assistance now. And it may come to affect the reputation of the United States worldwide. From NPR, I'm Juana Summers. This message comes from NPR sponsor, SAP Concur. Latora Jackson, senior manager of finance projects at Atracure, shares how SAP Concur solutions helped them automate outdated procedures so employees could focus on purposeful work.

Literally, employees would receive a mailed invoice from our suppliers, put it in an approval folder, and walk it around to about three different desks. The great thing with concur invoice, it provides automatic workflow. The AI technology for the invoice reading has made it seamless and almost touchless for our accounts payable team to be more efficient in what they're doing. We're now able to have team building and decision-making input from that team that we normally didn't have the time to receive before. So it was almost like a retraining of the brain on job functionality and opportunities that they have here at Atrecure.

Visit concur.com to learn more. It's Consider This from NPR. The cuts to foreign aid and the shutting down of USAID had widespread impact on countries and programs that relied on that assistance. NPR spot. Mattanis and Gabriela Emmanuel have been following this all year and spoke with my co-host, Mary Louise Kelly, about it. Gabriela, just reaction. The Trump administration makes this move right out of the gate. Reaction globally was what? At the beginning, total shock. Some people we spoke to called this kind of a cataclysmic event. Okay, so fat met the Y question. Why did the Trump administration, A, feel they need to do it and B do it so quickly? Well, it became clear quickly that the Trump administration viewed foreign aid as a big, fat problem, that it was not aligned with the national interest. It cost too much money, even though, you know, foreign aid was about 1% of the overall federal budget. So they wanted to really take the whole thing apart and recreate it in a way that fits the America First foreign policy. USAID as the agency that led foreign aid was seen by Trump Republicans as a bastion of the left. And some of its programs that supported

gender equity or LGBTQ rights or climate solutions or even reproductive health, they were seen as part of this woke agenda that taxpayers should not be funding. And the president even accused the agency of waste, fraud, and abuse, even though the White House hasn't provided evidence of that so far. I spoke with Max Primarach. He's with the Heritage Foundation. It's the conservative think tank that was behind Project 2025. Primarac has held several senior roles at USAID in the past. Here's how you put it. We were spending money every year. It was never changing.

We weren't solving problems. We were not putting Africans in the lead. And it just through inertia, spending a lot of money without really seemingly to get the kinds of results that we wanted. Other global health experts disagree. You know, we talked to people who said USAID could have been certainly improved in many different ways. But they also said that, you know, burning it all down as the administration did was arbitrary and irresponsible. Well, and Gabriela, say more about the burning it all down and the consequences. You were starting to describe this as you were hearing from people chaos, words like cataclysmic.

What was the impact? Yeah, so we talked to people all over the world. One woman who her son had died because their U.S. funded hospital had closed, another whose baby had died because she could no longer get the treatment for severe malnutrition. When I went to Zambia about eight weeks after the foreign aid freeze went into effect, I met people who were on HIV medications and found that overnight their neighborhood clinics had shut down. These were clinics funded by the U.S. That had been part of this kind of massive decade-long effort that was started under

George W. Bush to control HIV AIDS. The U.S. put over $100 billion into this. It's credited with saving 26 million lives. And then suddenly the doors are locked, electricity turned off, and people could no longer get their daily meds. Okay. So just make this specific. Like, is there one human story you would tell that brings us home? Yes. So one mom I met Teresa Mwanza. She had a 10-year-old daughter. They were both HIV-positive. They got their daily medication from one of these local U.S. funded clinics in their neighborhood. and then one day her daughter went to get their medications. Here's Teresa Mawanza.

So she'll run to the clinic and then she'll come back home and say, oh, the clinic is closed. They're not there anymore. And what are we going to do? I was with them at their house. The little girl was confused about what was happening. And at that point, when I met the two of them, they had completely run out of their medications.

And the 10-year-old girl, the daughter, was already showing visible signs of the virus of HIV, returning because she wasn't on her meds. And this is not an isolated event. I met many others who this was happening to as well, people losing weight, developing these open sores, flu-like symptoms, all signs that HIV was progressing to AIDS. And I'll just add here that the scale is hard to overstate. One study out of the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation found that this is the first year, this century, that child deaths under age five went up instead. of down, and that is directly due to aid cuts.

You know, Fatma, it's so interesting because it wasn't that long ago that you would have found a largely bipartisan consensus that, in fact, foreign aid was in America's interest. It was a tool of power that America could project abroad as soft power, but making friends, building goodwill, spreading ideals about America and American democracy. I know this is hard to answer, but are you able to track? how this year's developments have changed the way people see the United States? It is hard to track, like you said, but in speaking to people when we were out there on the ground overseas, you could see that it had had some impact on the way people viewed the United States.

I saw that when I was in Uganda in August. And there was confusion about why the U.S., a global superpower, as people put it, would suddenly stop giving money. Some people thought it was a sign that the U.S. was struggling financially or that it wasn't as strong as it used to be. but it was also clear that years of aid had bought the U.S. some goodwill among people. Like Ocot Bosco, he's a refugee from South Sudan, who lost his job with an aid group because of the U.S. cuts. And he told me America's foreign aid money was not just a one-way street. It wasn't just the recipients like himself who benefited.

America benefits, but they don't know that they are benefiting. They benefit. They trust. People trust them so much. Bosco grew up in a camp for displaced people, and he told me he never forgot the food and medicine that he and his family got, that carried the USAID logo, the American flag, with the words from the American people on it. Okay, so we're at this moment now, Fatma, where the U.S. is spending less money on foreign aid, and they're also spending it differently. There's a new approach they've rolled out. What is it?

That's right. They rolled it out in September. And instead of working with nonprofits or aid groups like the old model, the U.S. is now prioritizing working directly with governments, creating opportunities for American businesses and also faith-based organizations. So the State Department recently announced one of its first major grants, $150 million to the American drone company zip line to expand their operations in Africa, delivering medicine, blood supplies, other health supplies. They also made agreements with Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda, where the U.S. will be investing hundreds of millions of dollars to those countries and those governments will be also putting in money as well. Here's how Primarac with the Heritage Foundation sees this new strategy. This administration is being a far better steward of American taxpayer monies than previous administrations were.

So it's recognizing we have a debt problem, recognizing that we have to be effective around the world with less and taking the steps to do so. Okay, so the argument there for this new approach. Gabriella, one more question to you, just before I let you all go, what happened to the little girl who couldn't get her HIV meds? So we have good news here, actually. The Zambian government heard our reporting. They went to the villages where we had profiled the community, and they re-interviewed them, saw the situation, and made sure that they could access their HIV meds. It's a small number of people, relatively speaking, but it was a good sign. And Pierre's Gabriela Emmanuel and Fautman, Tennis.

Thank you so much for your reporting. Thank you. This episode was produced by Mallory U with additional reporting by Jonathan Lambert. It was edited by Patrick Jaron Watanananan and Rebecca Davis. Our executive producer is Sammy Yenigan. And thanks to our Consider This Plus supporters, who make the journalism you hear on the show possible, supporters also hear every episode without messages from sponsors. Learn more at plus.npr.org.

It's Consider This from NPR. I'm Juana Summers. This message comes from WISE. the app for using money around the globe. When you manage your money with Wise, you'll always get the mid-market exchange rate with no hidden fees. Join millions of customers and visit Wise.com. T's and C's Apply.

Want to hear this podcast without sponsor breaks? Amazon Prime members can listen to consider this sponsor-free through Amazon music. Or you can also support NPR's vital journalism and get Consider This Plus at plus.npr.org. That's plus.npr.org. Thank you.